sample letter of recommendation for research fellowship

Sample Recommendation Letter for Fellowship Applicant

jackmac34/Pixabay

• Recommendation Letters
• Choosing a Graduate Program
• Tips & Advice
• Admissions Essays
• Medical School Admissions
• Homework Help
• Private School
• College Admissions
• College Life
• Business School
• Distance Learning

A good recommendation letter can help you stand out among other fellowship applicants. You will most likely need at least two letters of recommendation as part of the application process. The best recommendations will come from people who know you well and can offer specific information about you as a student, person, or employee.

The sample recommendation letter shown below has been reprinted (with permission) from EssayEdge.com, which did not write or edit this sample recommendation letter. However, it is a good example of how a business recommendation should be formatted for a fellowship application.

Sample Recommendation Letter for a Fellowship

To Whom It May Concern:

I am proud to recommend a beloved student, Kaya Stone, for your fellowship program . I was asked to write as one who has functioned in the capacity of an employer of Kaya, but I would first like to say a few words about him as a student.

Kaya is a highly intelligent, perceptive young man. He came to our institution committed to capitalizing on the opportunity of his third year of study in Israel, and he left with the satisfaction of having accomplished that goal. Kaya grew in learning, in character, in his depth of understanding. He seeks truth in each area of his life, whether in learning, discussing philosophy, or relating to his fellow students and his teachers. Because of his positive disposition, his reflective way of operating, and all of the character traits that make him so special, Kaya’ s questions never go unanswered, and his searches always bring him to exciting discoveries. As a student , Kaya is outstanding. As an educator, I have watched him grow, seen his talents and abilities not only in the classroom but outside its walls when interacting with all types of people as well.

During his time at our institution, Kaya, who as I’m sure you know is an excellent writer and publicist, also has done a good deal of work for the yeshiva. This has included the text for many public relations brochures and packets, letters to parents, potential donors, and alumni, and essentially any correspondence which I have requested that he compose. The feedback is always overwhelmingly positive, and he has done so much in that way for our yeshiva. Even today, while he studies elsewhere, he continues to do a great deal of this work for our institution, in addition to the recruiting and other services he performs for the yeshiva.

Always, in his work, Kaya is consistent, dedicated and passionate, enthusiastic, cheerful, and a pleasure to work with. He has incredible creative energies and a refreshing idealism tempered only enough to accomplish what needs to be done. I highly recommend him for any position of work, leadership, education, or any other capacity in which he can spread his excitement and share his talents with others. At our institution, we are expecting big things from Kaya in the way of educational and communal leadership in the years to come. And knowing Kaya, he will not disappoint, and probably will exceed our expectations.

Thank you once again for the opportunity to recommend such a special and impressive young man.

Sincerely Yours,

Steven Rudenstein Dean, Yeshiva Lorentzen Chainani

• Sample Recommendation Letters for College Applicants
• Sample Recommendation Letter From Teacher
• Sample Recommendation Letter for Graduate School
• College Recommendation Letter Do's and Don'ts
• A Guide to Writing Recommendation Letters
• Sample Business School Recommendation Letter
• Sample Letter of Recommendation - Business School Applicant
• Graduate School Recommendation Letter From Professor
• Getting the Best MBA Recommendation Letters
• Thanking a Professor for Writing a Recommendation Letter
• Letters of Recommendation for MBA Applicants
• Sample Graduate School Recommendation Letters
• Sample Recommendation Letter: Business Program Recommendation
• 4 Recommendation Letter Samples That Get It Right
• Who Should You Ask for a Recommendation Letter?
• Should You Get a Recommendation for Grad School from Your Therapist?

• AI Content Shield
• AI KW Research
• AI Assistant
• SEO Optimizer
• AI KW Clustering
• Customer reviews
• The NLO Revolution
• Press Center
• Help Center
• Content Resources
• Facebook Group

Professional Letters to Support a Fellowship Application

Table of Contents

A letter of recommendation is an integral part of any fellowship application. It provides the selection committee insight into an applicant’s character and qualifications. And this can be a deciding factor in whether or not the applicant is awarded the fellowship. Looking at a  sample letter of recommendation for fellowship program  can be very helpful in getting started with your letter.

Lucky for you, we’ve rounded up some great sample letters that you can refer to in this article. We’ll also share some of the key steps to writing a recommendation letter that’s both informative and enjoyable to read.

What Your Recommendation Letter Should Include

A letter of recommendation for a fellowship should be well-written and tailored to the kind of fellowships the candidate is applying to. It should highlight the candidate’s strengths and explain why they would make a good fit for the program.

Some of the main information you should include in your letter are:

• The candidate’s Name, contact information, and academic history.
• What the fellowship program is about, and the reason why they’re interested in it
• Description of the candidate’s educational and professional achievements.
• Details about the candidate’s qualifications.
• Reasons you think the candidate would be a good fit for the fellowship program.

How to Write a Recommendation Letter for a Fellowship Program

Writing a recommendation letter doesn’t have to be all that complicated. Here are some simple steps that you can follow:

• Start by introducing yourself and stating your position or relationship to the applicant. 
• Share what you know about their academic and professional accomplishments, as well as any other information that may be relevant.
• Highlight specific qualities or traits that make them a strong candidate for the fellowship program. 
• Provide detailed examples of how they have demonstrated these qualities in past experiences or projects.
• Finally, offer your endorsement and say why you believe they would be an excellent fit for the fellowship opportunity.

Professional Sample Letter of Recommendation for Fellowship Program

Dear [Name of Program Head],

I am writing to recommend [Name of Applicant] for the [Name of fellowship program]. I have known [Name of Applicant] for many years and can attest to his intelligence and dedication. He has always been a top student in everything he does, and I am confident he would excel in this program. 

[Name of Applicant] is an excellent communicator and possesses strong critical-thinking skills. He also has a great sense of humor, which makes him fun to be around. In addition to all these qualities, [Name of Applicant] is hardworking and responsible; I know he would take advantage of this opportunity fully. 

If you have any questions about [Name of Applicant]’s qualifications, please do not hesitate to contact me at your convenience. Thank you for your time and consideration. 

[Signature]

To Whom It May Concern, 

I am writing to recommend [Name of applicant] for [Name of fellowship program]. I have known [Name of applicant] for many years and have always been impressed by their intelligence and work ethic.

In addition to being an excellent student, [Name of applicant] is also highly well-rounded and has a wide range of interests. I can think of no one who will be better suited for this opportunity than [Name of applicant].

If you need more information, please do not hesitate to contact me at your earliest convenience. Thank you for your time and consideration. 

Sincerely, 

I am writing to recommend Kevin Smith for the XYZ Fellowship. I have worked with John extensively in a leadership capacity and can attest to his leadership strengths.

In our work together, he has consistently shown himself to be competent, innovative, and motivated. For example, during our last project together, John proved himself instrumental in developing an original solution that saved the team time and resources. 

I truly believe that John would excel as a fellow at XYZ organization, and I commend him for your consideration. If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at 555-555-1234. 

Thank you for your time and consideration!

Wrapping Up

A letter of recommendation plays a crucial role in a student’s success in applying for a competitive fellowship. They are one of the most influential elements in an application next to the student’s essays . As such, you shouldn’t take writing your recommendation letter lightly.

The letter should be professional and concise and speak to their qualifications and potential. Hopefully, you’ve gained some ideas on how to better write your letter through the  sample letter of recommendation for fellowship program  in this article.

Abir Ghenaiet

Abir is a data analyst and researcher. Among her interests are artificial intelligence, machine learning, and natural language processing. As a humanitarian and educator, she actively supports women in tech and promotes diversity.

Explore All Write A Good Reference Articles

Writing a character reference letter: an effective guide.

Writing a reference letter for someone’s character can be a huge responsibility.  Vouching for a person’s character is more than just…

• Write A Good Reference

A Guide to Writing an Effective Adoption Reference

An adoption reference letter is one of the vital requirements when it comes to home study documentation for adoption. The…

Essential Tips for Writing Better Visa Reference Letters

One of the most challenging aspects of global travel process is getting a well-written visa reference letter. You must be…

Guide on Writing Standard Textbook References

Academic writing draws on the knowledge and experience of multiple authors, not just one. It incorporates concepts and analysis from…

A Guide to Writing an Effective Employee Reference

When an employee leaves your company, providing them with a reference letter might help them land their next job. A…

The Key to Effective College Recommendation Letters

Writing a college reference letter is a prime example of how words have the power to affect someone’s life. Recommendation letters…

Writing Recommendation Letters

Information for referees.

A crucial part of each applicant’s application for fellowship programs is the quality of the supporting recommendation letters.  While each referee has their own style and approach to recommendation letters, the suggestions below synthesize guidance provided by fellowship foundations and faculty advisors who have successfully supported past fellowship recipients. 

What Fellowship Foundations look for in recommendation letters

Fellowship foundations have repeatedly emphasized that  fellowship  recommendation letters should be more than just general recommendation letters.  Individuals who write recommendation letters should pay close attention to  the applicant criteria and recommender guidelines found on each fellowship's website . 

Broadly speaking, fellowship letters should focus on:

• The applicant’s  intellectual and academic strengths  (If a referee knows an applicant well, it is also appropriate to comment on any personal knowledge you may have of an  applicant’s character )
• Specific examples of when the referee   has witnessed the applicant actively demonstrating their abilities  (this is much more important than the applicant’s score in a referee's class exams, although this is worth noting if the applicant was at the very top of their class)
• Why the applicant is  a good fit for the specific academic program  they have chosen to pursue (e.g., the MPhil in Biological Science in Pathology at Cambridge)
• How the applicant  meets the specific criteria for the fellowship  for which they are applying (recommendation writers are asked to pay particular attention to the  Applicant Criteria  and  Recommender Guidelines  found on specific fellowship websites)

Recommendation letter writers should mention how the referee knows the applicant (and for how long) and make certain to write a letter that  adheres to a specific fellowship’s word or character count limits , since some fellowships reject letters that do not adhere to their regulations.

What does not typically impress Fellowship Foundations in recommendation letters

• Generic short letters that do not indicate significant familiarity with the applicant
• Letters that summarize or repeat – without elaboration – information found elsewhere in the application, such as the applicant’s resume
• General praise of the applicant without specific examples
• Comments that focus on activities that are in the distant past
• Letters written by someone who lacks knowledge of the applicant’s accomplishments and goals

Avoiding biases in recommendation letters

• A large body of social science research indicates that even individuals with egalitarian beliefs can unintentionally discriminate in recommendation letters
• Common patterns of bias include describing women as warm (hardworking, collaborative, kind) and men as competent (brilliant, stellar, exceptional)
• Common bias patterns include writing shorter letters for women than men, and unintentionally communicating reservations about candidates in underrepresented groups with faint praise (smart, qualified, articulate, etc.)

Tips on formatting recommendation letters

• Letters should be addressed to the individual who chairs the fellowship committee (if known), or to the committee as a whole (students should provide referees with this information)
• Letters for major fellowships are typically on letterhead, and 1.5 - 2 pages, single spaced

Other considerations

• Referees are encouraged to ask the applicant who else is writing for them, so they can consider what else is being written (students should provide referees with this information)
• Referees are asked to consider other applicants for whom they are writing letters, so referees won’t repeat the same language for all applicants

Potential referees might wish to decline a request

• If the referee does not feel they can be emphatically positive about applicant
• If the referee recalls little more about an applicant than grade the applicant earned in a class
• If the referee does not believe s/he is an appropriate person to write a letter
• If the applicant approaches the referee in an unprofessional manner
• If the applicant does not provide ample time for the referee to craft a substantial letter

Letter of Recommendation for a Fellowship (Template)

Want to crush your interview.

Learn how to ace your interview with superior confidence.

A letter of recommendation for fellowship is a letter written to a fellowship committee on behalf of a candidate. The letter should highlight the candidate's strengths and why they would be a good fit for the fellowship. It is important to tailor the letter to the specific fellowship for which the candidate is applying.

A letter of recommendation for fellowship should include

• The candidate's name, contact information, and academic history.
• Details about the fellowship program and why the candidate is interested in it.
• A description of the candidate's academic and professional achievements.
• Details about the candidate's skills and qualifications.
• Why the candidate would be a good fit for the fellowship program.

A letter of recommendation for a fellowship should be well-written and tailored to the specific fellowship for which the candidate is applying. It should highlight the candidate's strengths and explain why they would be a good fit for the program. The letter should be professional and concise, and it should be signed by someone who knows the candidate well and can speak to their qualifications.

There are many different types of fellowships, and each one requires a different type of recommendation letter. However, most fellowship applications require letters from professors or other professionals who can speak to your academic or professional achievements.

The following are four sample letters of recommendation for a fellowship application. Each letter is tailored to a specific type of fellowship.

Letter for a research fellowship

Dear _________,

It is my great pleasure to recommend ____________ for a research fellowship at your esteemed institution. ____________ is an outstanding young scholar with an impressive record of academic achievement. His/Her work in the field of ____________ has already garnered his/her national recognition, and I do not doubt that she will continue to produce groundbreaking research during his/her fellowship.

I have had the privilege of working with ____________ for several years, and I can attest to his/her passion for her work and her dedication to excellence. He/She is an excellent student and a gifted researcher, and I am confident that she will make significant contributions to the field of ____________ during his/her fellowship.

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions about ____________'s qualifications or suitability for this fellowship. I am happy to provide additional information.

Thank you for your consideration.

(Your Name)

(Your Email)

Letter for a teaching fellowship

To Whom It May Concern,

I am writing to recommend __________ for the teaching fellowship she has applied for. I have had the pleasure of working with ____________ as his/her teacher during the past school year, and I can say without hesitation that he/she is an outstanding educator.

____________ has a true passion for teaching, and he/she is constantly seeking new ways to engage her students in learning. He/She has a gift for taking complex concepts and making them understandable for students of all ages. His/Her classroom is always lively and engaging, and his/her students are always eager to learn more.

__________would be an excellent addition to any teaching team, and I highly recommend her for the teaching fellowship he/she has applied for. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Letter for a grant writing fellowship

Dear (the person you are recommending),

I am very pleased to recommend (name of the person you are recommending) for the grant writing fellowship. (He/She) is an exceptional writer and has a true gift for crafting compelling proposals. I have worked with (him/her) on numerous proposals, and I can attest to (his/her) skills in this area.

Moreover, (name of the person you are recommending) is a motivated and hard-working individual who is always willing to go the extra mile. I am confident that (he/she) will be an asset to any organization that hires (him/her).

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to hearing from you soon.

Letter for a general fellowship

I am writing in regards to the general fellowship that I saw advertised online. I am extremely interested in the opportunity and would love to learn more about it.

I am a recent graduate of (university name) with a degree in (major). I have experience in (relevant experience) , and I believe that I would be a great candidate for the fellowship.

I am eager to learn more about the program and what is required of me. Can you please send me more information, including the application deadline? I look forward to hearing from you soon.

(Your name)

Final Thoughts

When writing a letter of recommendation for fellowship, it is important to highlight the applicant's qualifications and to express your confidence in their ability to succeed. 

You should also be sure to include any relevant information about your relationship with the applicant, such as how long you have known them and what you have observed of their work ethic and academic ability.

Recommendation Letter Templates

More recommendation letter resources.

• College Student
• Eagle Scout
• Graduate School
• Scholarship
• How to Ask for a Letter of Recommendation
• How to Ask Someone to be a Professional Reference

Letter Resources

• Letter of Recommendation
• Reference Letter
• Character Reference Letter
• Business Letter
• Letter of Interest
• Employment Verification Letter
• Termination Letter

About the author

Patrick Algrim is a Certified Professional Resume Writer (CPRW), NCDA Certified Career Counselor (CCC), and general career expert. Patrick has completed the NACE Coaching Certification Program (CCP). And has been published as a career expert on Forbes , Glassdoor , American Express , Reader's Digest , LiveCareer , Zety , Yahoo , Recruiter.com , SparkHire , SHRM.org , Process.st , FairyGodBoss , HRCI.org , St. Edwards University , NC State University , IBTimes.com , Thrive Global , TMCnet.com , Work It Daily , Workology , Career Guide , MyPerfectResume , College Career Life , The HR Digest , WorkWise , Career Cast , Elite Staffing , Women in HR , All About Careers , Upstart HR , The Street , Monster , The Ladders , Introvert Whisperer , and many more. Find him on LinkedIn .

Fact checked: Our small and dedicated team rigorously evaluates every article, guide, and reference to ensure the information is accurate and factual. Learn more .

Popular Resources

35+ Phone Interview Questions & Best Sample Answers

Phone interviews have become a core part of the process when attempting to find a secured placement for an open position. Companies receive massive responses from potential candidates for any..

12+ Best Questions To Ask A Recruiter

Concerning a job search, you might receive numerous offers from your recruiters. Before you choose one, you need to assess all the conditions, for which it is vital that you know everything associated with the offered position..

Answering "What Makes You Unique" In A Job Interview

Answering this question during a job interview requires more than knowing why you are unique as an individual. Yes, the true scientific answer is made up of two main components: your..

250+ Ice Breaker Questions for Life

An ice breaker question is a question that’s asked from one person to another person in order to act as a conversation starter. It brings a connection...

10 Best Answers to "What Motivates You?"

Open-ended questions like “What motivates you?” can elicit a deer-in-the-headlights reaction from job candidates if they are unprepared. It’s a broad question and can leave the interviewer..

Answering "How Did You Hear About This Position" In An Interview

A lot of interviewers ask this question - how did you hear about this position? This way they can judge you if you are a passive or an active job seeker..

8 Best Thank You Emails After an Interview (Samples, Free Templates)

Writing a thank you note after an interview says a lot about you as a potential employee. Most notably, it says that you care about the opportunities presented..

Writing a Resignation Letter (How To Write It, Samples)

Writing the perfect letter of resignation is more of an art than it is a science. And we’re going to cover how to master that art form in this full guide..

How to End a Letter (Example Salutations, Sign Off's)

Knowing how to end a business note or email is an important skill to develop. It helps portray a sense of confidence, respect and tone to your message..

Help us by spreading the word

• Internships
• All Resources
• Cover Letters
• Job Descriptions
• Interview Questions
• Most popular
• Trivia Questions
• Trivia Questions for Kids
• 555 Meaning
• 333 Angel Number Meaning
• Most Likely To Questions
• Good Pick Up Lines
• Cute Names to Call Your Boyfriend
• Funny Insults
• Paranoia Questions
• 777 Angel Number Meaning
• Bad Pick Up Lines
• Funny Names

© Copyright 2024, algrim.co - Terms & Conditions - Privacy Policy - Illustrations

• Enroll & Pay

Writing Recommendation Letters

Letters of recommendation are crucial to a student’s success in a prestigious fellowship competition. After the student’s own essays, they are the most influential part of an application. As such, your role as a letter writer is fundamental.

These tips are intended to help you tailor your letter for the scholarship competition at hand; they are based on feedback given directly from members of selection committees for the Rhodes, Marshall, Goldwater, Truman and others in workshops and conferences within the National Association of Fellowship Advisors  (of which KU is an institutional member).

If you have questions or need additional resources, please email the Office of Fellowships at  [email protected] .

Writing Recommendation Letter Tips

Address the criteria.

Each fellowship or scholarship has a specific set of criteria that they want the letters to address. Note that what may be useful in a recommendation for graduate school or a job is not always well regarded by scholarship committees. Most of these awards are interested in much more than what a student did in the classroom.

Familiarize yourself with the mission of the foundation, and find concrete examples of the way that the student meets their expectations.

For some awards, you may need to explicitly address a specific topic in your letter, such as leadership.

Some foundations provide very specific advice (Truman, Marshall, Rhodes), which we encourage you to read.

Be Vivid and Specific

It can help a student stand out for the selection committee if you can relate anecdotes about the student that provide a sense of the student’s character, as well as his or her achievements.  

Prestigious awards often include programs and events for all the recipients, so the committee is interested in the student’s personal qualities that will make them a part of the scholarship community.

It is usually not necessary for letter writers to go into detail about a student’s GPA or other awards, as this information is typically covered elsewhere in the application.

Make Careful Comparisons

It can be very helpful to rank the student in comparison to other groups of students – i.e., among the best undergraduates I’ve ever taught; as good as my graduate students.

However, we recommend that you be careful with comparisons to specific past winners, as several foundation representatives have expressed that this is frowned upon in their committees. One committee member mentioned that she tends to have one of two reactions: “That person was awful; there’s no way I want another one like that!” or “That person was so good; there’s no way this student can compare!” Neither helps the student. The Goldwater Scholarship is one exception to this rule, but if you are ever in doubt, we are happy to provide guidance.

Keep in mind that at the national level, committees see only outstanding students, so they are unmoved to learn, for example, that "Student X was in the top 15% of my class."

Dos and Don'ts

• State how long and in what capacity you’ve known the student.
• Make a declaration early in the letter of your general assessment of the student to frame the rest of your text.
• Take advantage of short paragraphs to create more “white space” on the page. (This may seem trivial, but committee members mention it very frequently!)
• Describe the student’s individual contributions to the classroom, a lab project, community service project, etc.
• Comment on the student’s potential for success in graduate school, in a tutorial setting (at Oxford or Cambridge), as an independent researcher, etc. as appropriate for the scholarship at hand.

Please don’t:

• Give a lengthy description of your course syllabus or your grading policy.
• Write very long letters. Some scholarships have strict limits of 750 or 1000 words. A two-page letter is typical.
• Overly emphasize that the student always came to class on time and did homework, etc. – committee members tend to think two things: Is the student so unremarkable that this is worth mentioning? And, are the rest of the students at your university slackers?
• Mention “grade inflation.” This seems to be a running joke with committee members, who apparently do not take claims of universities or departments “not participating in grade inflation” at all seriously.
• Write letters unless you know the student well and are comfortable doing so.
• Ask students to write their own letters. Students should provide you with the information you need and could perhaps give you a list of things they would like you to highlight, but it is against the  NAFA Code of Ethics  to have students draft their own letters of recommendation. Please contact us with questions. We are happy to advise you through the process of writing your letter.

Submitting Your Letter

Most applications are now submitted electronically, so in most cases we will only need a PDF of your letter on letterhead. The student or the fellowship advisor will contact you to let you know the details of submission.

Some programs (such as the Marshall Scholarship) require you to paste the text of your letter into a textbox in an online form, thus preventing any formatting. While some foundations require that you submit the letter yourself, others (such as Astronaut, Truman and Udall) have you submit the letter to the campus representative.

When students are still at the campus nomination stage of the process, we ask that you submit your letters via the KU campus online letter submission form.

Letter Confidentiality

The Office of Fellowships requires that students waive their right of access for all letters submitted on their behalf and will never share your letter with students. If you wish to share a letter you may do so, but we leave that decision to you. Our policy is in keeping with the wishes of the foundations, many of which will only accept confidential letters.

Keep in mind that letters submitted to the Office of Fellowships will be read by campus nomination committee members. At the campus nomination stage, you may consider your letter a draft to be read by KU colleagues; there is usually plenty of time to make revisions before the national deadline.

Writing Letters of Recommendation

You are here.

• Examples of what the applicant has done (e.g., if the student wrote a brilliant paper, mention its topic and why it stood out).
• Merits of the proposed research project, course of study, internship, etc.
• Positive impact the fellowship would have on the student's short- or long-term goals and overall educational trajectory.Place the student in a larger context: e.g., a letter could compare the present applicant to past applicants/winners. If possible, the student can be compared to graduate students or professionals. Quantitative remarks and percentages may be useful: "among the three best students I have taught." The strongest comparisons have the widest reach: "top 5% of students in my 20 years of teaching" is stronger than "the best in his section."
• Draw on the remarks of colleagues for supporting evidence or the acknowledgement of specific strengths. Letters from professors may also draw on the comments from teaching assistants who may have worked more closely with the applicants.
• Ask a student to send you a current resume and relevant application materials and have a conversation with the student about what to highlight. These can be helpful guides as you craft your recommendation. 
• Be aware of bias in letter writing (avoid gendered language, racial stereotypes) 
• Be honest with yourself. Consider whether you can dedicate the time and energy to writing a detailed letter. If not, say no (see below.)

  Avoiding Racial Bias in Letter of Reference Writing 

Avoiding Gender Bias in Letter of Reference Writing 

Tip: Think about how your letter of recommendation might help shape an interview with the fellowship committee.

On the whole, the following are not helpful: 

• Letters that consist largely of unsupported praise and fail to provide specific examples of points mentioned or generic letters sent without regard to the specific fellowship, course of study, or project proposed.
• Letters that may be read as implying criticism (beware of left-handed compliments) or whose criticisms might be taken to indicate stronger reservations than stated. Letters should be honest - and honest criticism, if generously presented, can enhance the force of a letter - but committees take critical comments very seriously.

When to Say "No"

There may be times when declining to write a letter is the best thing to do, such as:

• If the student asks too close to the deadline or approaches you in a highly unprofessional manner (We advise students to ask for letters no less than three weeks in advance of a deadline.)
• If you feel that you cannot be emphatically positive in support of a student.
• If you recall little more about a student than the recorded grades.
• If you do not have the time to write a good letter or if you think that you are not the best person to write a letter. 

Tip: You can help the student to consider alternative letter writers, but agreeing to write for a student whom you cannot strongly support does not help.

Other Considerations

• If you are called upon to write letters for two or more applicants for the same fellowship, beware of using too much of the same language in each, especially if they will be read by the same committee. If you have questions about whether your students are applying through the same region for external fellowships, please contact Fellowship Programs ( [email protected] or 203-432-8685).
• Although we encourage students to provide their recommenders with helpful, detailed information, it is not ethical to request that students provide drafts of their own letters. Faculty should also beware of leaning too heavily on material provided by students, since students give much the same information to each recommender and following this too closely can lead to letters that sound too similar.
• If you have written a letter in collaboration with another faculty member, be mindful about how you and your colleague use subsequent versions of that letter. We want to avoid situations in which a student is represented by different letters with largely identical language from two different faculty members.

(Some of the items above are responses to an informal survey of Truman Scholarship selection panel members. With thanks to Mary Tolar, former Deputy Secretary of the Truman Scholarship Foundation.)

Note: Lost your copy of a letter you wrote? If it was submitted through our office and we still have it on file, we'll gladly send it to you upon your request.

If you are writing for an external award like the Truman, Rhodes, Marshall, or Fulbright, the applicant should provide you with specific guidelines pertaining to that competition.

Faculty & Staff

• Advising and Letters of Recommendation
• Fellowship Committees
• Fellowship Administrators

• +919946991401
• [email protected]

Fellowship Letter of Recommendation Writing Guide 2024

Trying to guarantee yourself a spot in the fellowship program at your dream university? A powerful recommendation letter for fellowship might do the magic.

In the face of the raging competition to join the top institutes, you must strengthen your application in every way possible. Remember, when applying to a leading institution, you’re competing against other candidates with similarly impressive academic merit. The word of a credible recommender can make a huge difference and increase your chances of getting selected.

If you seek a sample letter of recommendation for fellowship program, you’ve come to the right page. However, this article also covers a step-by-step guide on how to write a reference letter for fellowship programs, along with the best practices.

Table of Contents

What is a Fellowship Letter of Recommendation? Why is it Important?

What do admission officers expect to find in a recommendation letter for fellowship?

Recommendation letter for fellowship sample

Write your fellowship reference letter in 6 steps

Who can write a recommendation letter for fellowship?

Your fellowship LOR is an integral part of your application to a fellowship program. To put it simply, a recommendation letter is a letter endorsing your competence and assuring the admission committee that you’re indeed a deserving candidate.

A Recommendation Letter for research fellowship usually comes from a professor or other academic professional who has taught or mentored you. However, considering how busy they are and how often they receive requests for such letters, they don’t always have the time to write one. Instead, you might have to draft the letter yourself and get it signed by the recommender.

A recommendation letter for fellowship plays a huge role in your application, because it testifies to your qualities and abilities. Not everything can be included in your CV; there are various additional aspects that might influence the admission committee’s decision.

Your reference letter for postdoctoral fellowship can be the difference between getting selected for the fellowship program or having your application rejected. This is why it’s crucial to make sure that your LOR is powerful and puts you in the best light possible.

consulting a professional academic writer can reduce rejection/mistake risks. 

What Questions Should You Ask Before Writing a Reference Letter for Fellowship?

It’s imperative to cover all the relevant details in your recommendation letter. The LOR should also be tailored to your profile and your requirements. Make sure to ask yourself the following questions before you draft your recommendation letter for fellowship program. In case your recommender is the one writing it, discuss these with him/her.

How is the recommender connected to you?

The person recommending you for the fellowship program must be in a trustable position to do so. Explaining the recommender’s connection to the candidate makes the letter a lot more credible.

How well does your endorser know you?

Being in a trustable position to recommend you isn’t enough – the recommender should also know you well enough to provide valuable insights.

What kind of fellowship program are you applying to?

If you check out our fellowship recommendation letter sample, you’d notice that a good recommendation later is tailored according to the fellowship program it is for. The letter must elaborate on why the candidate is perfect for the program in particular.

What makes you a deserving candidate for the program?

The whole point of a reference letter for fellowship is to reinforce the idea that you deserve a chance to prove yourself through the fellowship program. Think of all the qualities that make you a deserving candidate.

Is there a specific format you need to follow?

Often, institutes set specific formats and other requirements that candidates must follow when writing their recommendation letters. If nothing is specified, you may follow the format used in our recommendation letter sample for fellowship application.

• LOR For Doctor
• LOR For Harvard
• LOR For Volunteer
• LOR For Cyber Security
• LOR For MBA
• LOR For Fulbright
• LOR For Internship
• LOR For Sorority
• LOR For Fellowship
• LOR For Civil Engineer
• LOR For Co-Worker
• LOR For Teacher
• LOR For Friend
• LOR For Scholarship
• LOR For Character
• LOR For Law School
• LOR For Promotion
• LOR For Job
• LOR For Court

What Do Admission Officers Expect to Find in a Recommendation Letter for Fellowship?

The reason why LORs hold such importance is that the admission officers rely on them for a variety of information and insights on the candidates. Here are some of the details that your recommendation letter must cover.

Personality:

The recommender’s impression of your personality can have a strong influence on the admission committee’s decision. The more your personality is relevant to the program, the better.

Soft skills:

Your hard skills are already covered in your CV, but your endorser can prove additional insights into your soft skills.

Uniqueness:

Let’s face it – basic qualities like being a hardworking student and having strong academic merit are too common in LORs. Your recommendation letter must cover unique individual traits that set you apart from the rest.

Justification:

Hollow praise doesn’t do much good in a recommendation letter for fellowship doctor When discussing the candidate’s qualities, the recommender must justify them with examples.

Professionalism:

Admission officers judge the authenticity of an LOR based on its tone and pitch. Of course, an LOR written by an experienced academic professional would usually be very different from one written by a candidate who is new to writing recommendation letters.

How long should a fellowship reference letter be?

As you might notice in our sample recommendation letter for fellowship program, LORs are usually 400 to 500 words long. Unless the institute’s LOR guidelines state otherwise, try to keep it within one page of an A4-sized sheet.

The font size should be either 11 or 12, and stick to professional fonts only. Arial and Times New Roman are good choices. Remember to maintain a 1-inch margin on each side of the page.

Recommendation Letter for Fellowship Sample

The following sample recommendation letter for fellowship program will help you get a better understanding of what your LOR should look like. Take note of how the recommender has endorsed the candidate without seeming to praise him blindly or excessively. You may follow this sample fellowship letter of recommendation to fine-tune the tone, pitch, and format in your own LOR.

To whom it may concern,

It’s my privilege to recommend Mr Sounak Basu for your Journalism and Mass communication fellowship program. I am writing this later in the capacity of an educator who supervised Sounak through his research efforts during his postgraduate program. Having him as my student was a pleasure, for he always showed qualities that set him apart from the rest.

Sounak is a dedicated and hardworking student to say the least. However, it’s his inquisitive nature and hunger for knowledge that drew my attention. He has a strong passion for understanding complex theories down to their roots. However, he doesn’t just stop at learning the theories – he takes a practical approach and seeks to utilise them in his research endeavours.

I believe Sounak would be an ideal candidate for the fellowship program at your institute, not only due to his commitment to learning but also because of his active participation. I’ve grown to know him as a team player who’s always ready to volunteer for different projects and events. Not many students I’ve supervised have displayed his level of integrity, practicality, and dedication.

I’d also like to point out that Sounak took up a number of side projects on his own initiative during his postgraduate program under my guidance. I feel gratified to have had the privilege of guiding him with those projects and evaluating them. He certainly has the ability to think out of the box, always coming up with unique research ideas.

Lastly, I should mention that during my time as his mentor, I got to know him quite well as a person. Sounak is a cheerful and passionate student who is always ready to assist others as needed. Not only is he a committed learner himself, but he also takes pleasure in guiding other students with complex concepts and projects.

At this stage of his academic life, Sounak needs the global exposure offered by an esteemed institution like yours. I believe that pursuing a fellowship program at your institute will help him unlock his true potential and reach new heights. Considering his inquisitive nature, unrelenting commitment, and creativity, I don’t doubt that his success would, in turn, benefit the academic world.

I sincerely thank you for the opportunity to recommend an amazing student like Sounak, and can assure you that he would be a great addition to your esteemed institute. Do feel free to reach out to me if you have any questions.

Yours Sincerely,

Rajiv Sharma,

Department of Journalism and Mass Communication,

University of Calcutta,

Guidelines for Using Samples

Of course, you can’t simply use the sample as a template – it would become too generic. Here’s how you can leverage LOR samples.

• First, go through multiple (at least four) sample letters of recommendation for fellowship program to check out different angles that a recommender can cover.
• Always customize and contextualise your recommendation letter with your personal information. This is very important to avoid getting your application rejected.
• The quality of your LOR must match that of the sample letter of recommendation for fellowship program.

Write Your Fellowship Reference Letter in 6 Steps

Here’s a simple step-by-step guide on writing an effective recommendation letter for fellowship program.

Step 1: Explain the endorser’s connection with you

As mentioned earlier, establishing the endorser’s credibility is crucial. The introductory paragraph should explain the endorser’s relationship with the candidate.

Cover the academic qualities

Since the recommendation letter is for an academic program, your academic qualities take priority. In this regard, don’t forget to cover personality traits that enhance your academic performance.

Talk about extracurricular and additional activities

In addition to the candidate’s academic excellence in general, the endorser should also bring up any extra projects or activities that the candidate has partaken in.  

Write about the candidate’s personality

Step 5: summarise the contents and persuade.

The second-last section of the recommendation letter should summarize the candidate’s qualities and push the recommendation, emphasizing that he/she would be a great candidate.

Step 6: Conclude the letter

Finally, conclude the letter on a positive note, thanking the reader. The recommender should also share his/her contact details and assure the admission officers that they can contact him/her if they have any queries.

Who Can Write a Recommendation Letter for Fellowship?

The person writing your recommendation letter for fellowship must be in a position of authenticity and authority. The letter should also come from someone who knows you well enough to vouch for you. Usually, fellowship recommendation letters are written by professors, mentors, and HODs.

Final Checklist

• Does the letter establish the recommender’s credibility?
• Has the letter been written in the right format?
• Is the flow of information sequential and logical?
• Did you customize the LOR properly?
• Is your LOR as good as the sample letter of recommendation for fellowship program?

Dos and don’ts

• Maintain a professional tone
• Proofread the document multiple times
• Stay positive and enthusiastic
• Emphasize your nature and personality
• Use a flawless and high-quality language
• Refrain from copying a recommendation letter for postdoc position sample and simply changing the names and course details.
• Don’t exceed the specified word count.
• Refrain from using any informal words or phrases.
• Never use false information or exaggerate the candidate’s qualities.
• Don’t spend too many words on generic qualities and achievements.

Tips for Writing a Fellowship LOR

• Make sure the strengths discussed in the letter align with the requirements of the fellowship program in question.
• Dedicate a paragraph explaining why the applicant is an ideal candidate for the institute.
• Justify your statements about the candidate using practical examples.
• Open the letter with a strong introduction and close it with a convincing conclusion.
• Follow the sample recommendation letter for fellowship program closely.

Hopefully, the detailed guide and the sample above should be enough to help you draft a powerful recommendation letter for fellowship for yourself.

However, don’t hesitate to seek out professional assistance if you aren’t confident about writing a good LOR or find it too difficult.

Expert LOR writers can craft highly tailored recommendation letters for every purpose.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Vasuki Ram, senior writer and the founder of SOP Consultants is a B-tech Graduate who used to work in an MNC. Starting from 2013, she along with her team has assisted more than 10,000 students. Shift in her career was drastic. Read full story here.

• Chandigarh Patiala Amritsar
• Jammu & Kashmir
• SOP for MBA
• SOP for Law Internship
• SOP for Tourism
• SOP for Social Work
• SOP for Graduate School
• SOP for Phd
• SOP for Engineering
• SOP for Scholarship
• SOP for Computer Science

• +91 9946991401
• Terms and Conditions
• Privacy Policy
• Refund Policy

© Copyright 2024 SOP Consultants | Designed by NS

© Copyright 2023 SOP Consultants | Designed by NS

Get Best Work for your Price

0% Ai Content, 100% Human Written

Ph.D Experts

We provide online assistance from our experts .

Plagiarism Free Content Guranteed

We guarantee the delivery of work free from plagiarism.

Affordable Price Guaranteed

Top-quality content at budget-friendly prices.

Offer valid for limited time only

• Utility Menu

GA4 tracking code

• CARAT (Opportunities Database)
• URAF Application Instructions
• URAF Calendar

Recommendation Letters

Recommendation letters are a critical element of every application. They validate the claims you've made as an applicant, providing specific examples and details of your academic accomplishments, personal endeavors, and character. Selection committees rely on them to impartially evaluate your performance and potential to be successful in the opportunity you are pursuing. Good letter-writers are those who know you well enough to provide these assessments with enthusiasm and authenticity.

Academic letters are typically written by faculty, lecturers, or faculty research advisors who have overseen your work in courses, research settings, or other academic contexts. These letters generally address how you performed, your potential for future success in the field, and any other attributes that make you qualified for the particular award. Post-doctoral associates/fellows and graduate students may also have insight into your performance if they've worked with you in a course or project. However, depending on the fellowship or research opportunity, they do not usually make suitable academic letter-writers. It is important that you check the criteria of the award and/or check-in with administrators who manage the award to see whether letters from non-faculty members would be appropriate for that opportunity.

Some students, especially those in their early college years, have not yet had the opportunity to directly interact with faculty – perhaps you have had more direct interaction with Teaching Fellows ("TFs"). In these cases, you might consider asking the faculty course leader or head of a research group to work together with your TF to generate a co-signed letter. Keep in mind, though, that coordinating co-signed letters takes more time than usual, so plan ahead. Peers (other college students or recent alumni in student organizations), on the other hand,  are not suitable letter writers. If you're applying for a non-academic opportunity, or one that is specifically interested in learning about the applicant's personal attributes (character, leadership potential, commitment to service, etc.), then you might consider asking for a letter of recommendation from a College staff member or organization supervisor, coach, faculty who may be familiar with your work outside of the classroom, work supervisor, or Resident Dean or other House staff.

Letters from high school teachers or your high school years: Soliciting letters from high school teachers is not usually acceptable for fellowship and research opportunities at the college level. However, there are some exceptions to this rule. If you've engaged in research as a high school student and are applying to a competitive research fellowship that funds independent study (e.g. Herchel Smith Harvard Summer Science Fellowship ) as a first-year student, it may be acceptable to provide a letter from that experience, but only if the writer can provide strong evidence that you are qualified to pursue an independent research project.

Navigating Recommendations

Letters of recommendation are a critical part of academic and professional development. If you need a letter from a faculty member, research advisor, or other Harvard community member, do not be afraid to ask if they'd be willing to provide you a strong recommendation letter (even if the deadline is still years away, for instance, a medical school/graduate school application).

Help them help you.

• Ask for recommendation letters in advance of the deadline—at least 3-4 weeks' notice is typical. Usually, letters of recommendation are due at the  same time as your own materials! Please take note of this.
• Remind the recommender how they know you, if they have not heard from you in a while. If being in their course was significant to your development or trajectory, let them know! You might also consider re-sending a copy of a paper or project you wrote for their class, to remind them of your good work.
• Give your recommenders specific instructions – this includes how, where, and when to submit the recommendation letter and any guidance from the selection committee on specific topics recommenders should be addressing. If you'd like the recommender to highlight events, skills, or experiences that speak to your qualifications for the opportunity, tell them so. Invite their questions about your materials and the application process, and check-in with them frequently as the deadline approaches.
• Don’t be afraid to ask for multiple letters. Recommenders who have agreed to support your application for one opportunity may also be willing to recommend you for another. If you are considering asking for multiple letters, you'll need to provide specific information about each opportunity, so that your recommender knows how to tailor their letter to best complement your application. (Remember, give plenty of notice—just because they have written for you before doesn't mean they can write a new letter overnight!) Check in frequently to see if they have any questions or concerns or need more information from you.

Give thanks and provide updates.

Regardless of the outcome of your application, be sure that you let your recommenders know you appreciate the effort and time they put toward the recommendation and update them on the outcome of your joint efforts. Even after the experience is long over, do your best to check-in with those recommenders; keeping them engaged with your trajectory is the best way to keep them engaged as your advocate and mentor.

• Getting Started
• Application Components
• Interviews and Offers
• Building On Your Experiences
• Applying FAQs

support your career

get the interview & get the job

• Professional Development

How To Write a Fellowship Letter of Recommendation in 6 Steps

A letter of recommendation for a fellowship can be a powerful tool in helping students become competitive applicants for highly sought after awards. It helps to provide an objective assessment of the applicant’s qualifications and background and can be an important factor in the selection process. When writing a letter of recommendation for a fellowship, it is important to keep in mind the purpose and goals of the fellowship for which the applicant is applying. Demonstrating an understanding of the program and the applicant’s potential to excel in it can help to make a compelling case for their candidacy. When crafting a letter of recommendation, one should include information on the applicant’s academic background, work experience, and relevant accomplishments. In addition, it is also important to provide a candid assessment of the applicant’s character and ability to contribute to the fellowship program. Finally, your letter should be written in a professional and respectful tone, while making sure to highlight the applicant’s unique talents and skills.

What to include in a fellowship recommendation letter

If you’re writing a letter of recommendation for someone who is applying for a fellowship, take into account the following points:

Specific examples

It’s crucial to provide specific examples of the applicant’s or student’s accomplishments. This demonstrates your knowledge of their skills and abilities. Additionally, it demonstrates to the admissions committee that you are speaking truthfully when discussing the applicant. The applicant’s qualifications are better explained with specific examples, which can strengthen the letter and increase their chances of admission.

Purpose of the program

An explanation of how the student fits the program’s goals should also be included in the letter of recommendation. For instance, if submitting a research project proposal is a requirement of the fellowship program, you should discuss why you believe the proposed study will be worthwhile. Strengthening the recommendation letter by offering more assistance with the student’s research or course of study

Impact on the applicant

A description of how the fellowship might benefit the applicant is another thing you could put in. This section might discuss how a fellowship could help an applicant achieve their academic and professional objectives. Include a description of your thoughts in this section if you think the fellowship would help the applicant personally.

Positively framed weaknesses

Try to frame any of the applicants’ flaws you point out in the letter in a positive light. Instead of saying that the applicant struggled to properly cite sources in research papers, you could say that they showed a commitment to enhancing their citation styles. Explaining shortcomings in a constructive manner can show the admissions committee that the applicant wants to keep developing their knowledge and skills.

Accurate details

It’s crucial to be as accurate as possible when adding specifics to the letter’s body. Instead of overstating a student’s abilities, try to back up your assertions with facts or figures. For instance, you might mention that the applicant completed their program in the top 10% of their class rather than merely stating that they were good students. By including a statistic, you can improve the accuracy of the information and give the admissions committee a better idea of the applicant’s range of skills.

Why is it important to write a letter of recommendation for a fellowship?

When submitting an application for a fellowship, a letter of recommendation is crucial because it enables the applicant to set themselves apart from other candidates. A fellowship is a program that broadens education through study, research, or an internship. Fellowships typically include a financial grant, stipend, or other compensation to help the fellow with program expenses. Given the fierce competition for many fellowship programs, a letter of recommendation can strengthen an application.

How to write a letter of recommendation for a fellowship

Consider taking the following actions if someone asks you to write a letter of recommendation for a fellowship program:

1. Converse with the applicant

Try to speak with the applicant for a while before you start writing. Ask them about the fellowship, the program, their research proposal, and any other topics that might help you write a stronger letter during this conversation. This knowledge will help you decide what kind of material to put in the letter’s body.

2. Address the letter to the appropriate recipient

It’s crucial to make sure you’ve addressed the letter to the correct recipient at the top. Sometimes, the fellowship program is overseen by a single person, and other times, an entire committee evaluates applicants. It’s best to either mention a specific person or address the committee as a whole. This shows that you are aware of the application process and have made an effort to comprehend the particular fellowship program.

3. Write an introduction

You can mention your relationship with the student in the letter’s opening paragraph. This could include your relationship with the applicant, how long you’ve known them, and your impressions of them overall. The admissions committee will better understand your qualifications to represent the applicant after reading your introduction. Additionally, it gives you a chance to highlight your own academic and professional accomplishments. A thorough opening can lay a solid groundwork for the remainder of the recommendation letter.

4. Write body paragraphs

There are one or two body paragraphs you can write following the introduction. Recommendation letters are ordinarily one to one and a half pages long. Employers may see from a longer letter that you have a lot of positive things to say about the applicant. The body paragraphs of the letter may describe the applicant’s prior work, discuss why you believe they would be a good fit for the fellowship program, or discuss the qualities of their character that would make them a strong student. The body paragraphs contain the bulk of your recommendation.

5. Write a conclusion

Try to conclude your letter by summarizing it after the body paragraphs. The main points of the letter are reemphasized in this paragraph, which also summarizes the key information. You could say in your conclusion that the admissions team can get in touch with you if they have any additional questions. This demonstrates your willingness to speak on behalf of the applicant in addition to the recommendation letter’s contents. The letter is more effective overall when it has a solid conclusion.

6. Proofread

Before mailing the letter, its important to proofread thoroughly. You can use proofreading to make sure you wrote the details clearly and included all the necessary information. If you frequently write letters of recommendation for students, proofreading can assist you in staying organized as you work. You can verify with the applicant at this time the recipient’s name, the mailing address for the letter, and the title of the fellowship program.

A sample recommendation letter for a fellowship application is provided below:

Dear [ admissions counselors name ] ,

Introduction:

Im writing this letter on behalf of [applicants name]. Theyre applying for admission to [name of fellowship program]. I had a working relationship with the applicant for [period of time] and was [type of relationship with applicant]. I was able to learn more about the applicant’s ability to work under pressure, conduct research, and dedication to getting things done during this time. I highly recommend [applicant] for this fellowship program.

Body paragraph:

This applicant has demonstrated their abilities in a number of situations, including [description of situation]. They also demonstrated the following skills [list a few pertinent skills or abilities] The applicant has proven their suitability, and I think they possess the necessary abilities to make a valuable contribution to this fellowship.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, I think [applicants name] is a fantastic choice for [fellowship name] because of their all-encompassing skills and credentials. I would be happy to have a phone conversation with you about the applicant if you have any additional questions.

[ Your name ]

Heres an example of a fellowship letter of recommendation:

January 5, 2022

Dear Political Science Fellowship Committee,

Harrison Rodriguez, who is applying for a position in your Political Theory Fellowship Program, has asked me to write on his behalf. My name is Dr. Jones, and Ive had the pleasure of supervising Mr. Rodriguez through his postgraduate research efforts. He has made significant contributions to numerous political theory research projects, so I think he qualifies for this fellowship.

Mr. Rodriguez is a committed student with a strong passion for comprehending how political theory affects how society functions. By compiling survey data and conducting various tests, he contributed to a study on voting patterns and socioeconomic status. Mr. If Rodriguez is awarded this fellowship, I believe the academic community would greatly benefit from the way his research would address important issues in politics and contemporary society.

In conclusion, I think Mr. Rodriguez is a driven and enthusiastic student who enhances any project in which he is involved. I sincerely recommend him for this fellowship, please take that into consideration. Please reach out if you have any questions.

Dr. Jones, Ph.D.

Writing Recommendation Letters for Fellowship Applicants

Who should I ask for a letter of recommendation for fellowship?

People who know you well enough to vouch for you in your application should write you letters of recommendation. It won’t help your application if a Nobel laureate who doesn’t know you recommends you.

How long should a fellowship recommendation letter be?

The letter should provide comprehensive but detailed information on observed performance in no more than two pages. Comments should be as succinct as possible. To ensure maximum availability to fellowship program directors, the letters must be finished by July 1.

Do you need a letter of recommendation for fellowship?

Most fellowships require at least one letter from a professor who specializes in the area you are applying for. Make sure you have at least one rotation during the course of the year that will give you time with a subspecialty faculty member who can serve as your letter of recommendation writer.

What is a fellowship letter?

SHARE. Individuals in a variety of fields who have attained a certain level of education and training and wish to begin a program of further studies in a specific specialty are intended for fellowship recommendation letters.

Related posts:

• What To Do When Coworkers Are Stepping on Your Toes at Work
• Cross Branding: Definition, Benefits and Examples
• What Is SOAP API? (And How It Differs From REST API)
• How To Write a Good Call to Action (With Examples)
• How To Become a Certified Addiction RN in 5 Simple Steps
• How To Get Your PCI Compliance Certification in 6 Steps
• How To Create Interview Blog Posts Including Example Questions
• 4 AALAS Certifications and How You Can Earn Them

Related Posts

What is price skimming (with advantages and disadvantages), 10 customer success strategies to improve your business, leave a reply cancel reply.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Facts and Figures
• Undergraduate Admissions
• Graduate Admissions
• Non-traditional Admissions
• Pay Deposit
• Undergraduate Majors
• Graduate Programs
• Honors College
• Study Abroad
• Professional & Continuing
• Online Programs
• Career Planning
• Living on Campus
• Clubs & Organizations
• Spirit & Traditions
• About Harrisonburg
• Pay Your Deposit
• Office of Financial Aid
• Freshman Scholarships

• James Madison University -->
• Student Awards, Initiatives & Research
• Getting Started
• Personal Statements
• Letters of Recommendation
• Refer A Student
• Recommendations
• Undergraduate Travel Grant Awards
• Graduate Travel Grant Awards
• Graduate Student Opportunities
• Undergraduate Research Journal
• Student Application
• Faculty Application
• Current Projects
• Past Projects

Letters of recommendation are one of the most important elements in a student's application for a national or international scholarship. Many of these awards are incredibly competitive. Applicants require excellent letters of recommendation in order to stand out.

Tips and Suggestions

• Address your letter to the selection committee for the scholarship or fellowship they are applying for. (For example, "Dear Goldwater Scholarship Selection Committee.")
• Discuss how long you have known the applicant and in what context.
• Wherever possible, provide specific and detailed examples of what the applicant has done. Be careful of giving hyperbolic praise without evidence. 
• Avoid listing academic information that is likely to be on the student's transcript (GPA, class rank, majors, minors) unless there is something not captured in the data that is important to share. 
• Many awards prefer you to include rankings or comparisons of the student to peers and/or to previous students you have taught. Percentages sometimes help: "This student ranks in the top 10% of students I have taught during my career in terms of intellectual curiosity."
• Letters praising good attendance, completing all assignments, and receiving A grades are generally not helpful. Many candidates for national scholarships will share these qualities. Reviewers are looking for more substantive information on the student’s potential as an outstanding scholar or future leader in their field.
• Be honest, but cautious about criticism. Committees take it seriously. Be fair to both the candidate and to the reader.
• Make the case for why the student is a strong candidate for the specific award they are applying to. Connect the student's talents and experiences to the selection criteria for the award. (See below for guidance on writing for specific awards.)
• While you can always ask students for resumes, descriptions of awards, and their particular interests, please do not ask the student to write the letter for you as an academic exercise, even if you plan to make substantial changes to their draft; this is specifically prohibited by most competitive fellowships.

Recommendation Guidance for Specific Awards

English Teaching Assistant (ETA) Awards: The application uses an online recommendation form rather than traditional letters. You will be asked to complete several short-answer questions online on such things as the applicant's communication skills, interest in teaching, and ability to work in unstructured environments. You should speak to the applicant's ability to teach English in a classroom abroad based on their intellectual and professional preparation.

Research/Study Awards: These applications require traditional letters of recommendation . Letters should be written in English (or accompanied by an official English translation), printed on institutional letterhead, and signed by you. The letter should discuss the applicant's ability to carry out the proposed project or course of study, their preparation and suitability for the endeavor, and their ability to represent the U.S. abroad.

For both ETA and research/study , recommenders should, according to Fulbright, “keep in mind that the applicant will be serving as a cultural ambassador representing the United States and that personal suitability, as well as academic excellence, is an important criterion to be considered.” These are not general character references. They should speak directly to the specific award type and the applicant's potential to be an excellent Fulbrighter.

From Goldwater Scholarship website:

• Letter format and submission requirements
• Letter writing guidance

Marshall website: Information for Recommenders.

Mitchell website: Recommenders and Endorsers .

NSF-GRFP website: Reference Writers .

Rhodes website: Guidance for Referees - USA .

Truman website: Letters of Recommendation .

Back to Top

• Expenditures
• Accessibility
• Social Media

• History, Facts & Figures
• YSM Dean & Deputy Deans
• YSM Administration
• Department Chairs
• YSM Executive Group
• YSM Board of Permanent Officers
• FAC Documents
• Current FAC Members
• Appointments & Promotions Committees
• Ad Hoc Committees and Working Groups
• Chair Searches
• Leadership Searches
• Organization Charts
• Faculty Demographic Data
• Professionalism Reporting Data
• 2022 Diversity Engagement Survey
• State of the School Archive
• Faculty Climate Survey: YSM Results
• Strategic Planning
• Mission Statement & Process
• Beyond Sterling Hall
• COVID-19 Series Workshops
• Previous Workshops
• Departments & Centers
• Find People
• Biomedical Data Science
• Health Equity
• Inflammation
• Neuroscience
• Global Health
• Diabetes and Metabolism
• Policies & Procedures
• Media Relations
• A to Z YSM Lab Websites
• A-Z Faculty List
• A-Z Staff List
• A to Z Abbreviations
• Dept. Diversity Vice Chairs & Champions
• Dean’s Advisory Council on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer and Intersex Affairs Website
• Minority Organization for Retention and Expansion Website
• Office for Women in Medicine and Science
• Committee on the Status of Women in Medicine Website
• Director of Scientist Diversity and Inclusion
• Diversity Supplements
• Frequently Asked Questions
• Recruitment
• By Department & Program
• News & Events
• Executive Committee
• Aperture: Women in Medicine
• Self-Reflection
• Portraits of Strength
• Mindful: Mental Health Through Art
• Event Photo Galleries
• Additional Support
• MD-PhD Program
• PA Online Program
• Joint MD Programs
• How to Apply
• Advanced Health Sciences Research
• Clinical Informatics & Data Science
• Clinical Investigation
• Medical Education
• Visiting Student Programs
• Special Programs & Student Opportunities
• Residency & Fellowship Programs
• Center for Med Ed
• Organizational Chart
• Leadership & Staff
• Committee Procedural Info (Login Required)
• Faculty Affairs Department Teams
• Recent Appointments & Promotions
• Academic Clinician Track
• Clinician Educator-Scholar Track
• Clinican-Scientist Track
• Investigator Track
• Traditional Track
• Research Ranks
• Instructor/Lecturer
• Social Work Ranks
• Voluntary Ranks
• Adjunct Ranks
• Other Appt Types
• Appointments
• Reappointments
• Transfer of Track
• Term Extensions
• Timeline for A&P Processes
• Interfolio Faculty Search
• Interfolio A&P Processes
• Yale CV Part 1 (CV1)
• Yale CV Part 2 (CV2)
• Samples of Scholarship
• Teaching Evaluations
• Letters of Evaluation
• Dept A&P Narrative
• A&P Voting
• Faculty Affairs Staff Pages
• OAPD Faculty Workshops
• Leadership & Development Seminars
• List of Faculty Mentors
• Incoming Faculty Orientation
• Faculty Onboarding
• Past YSM Award Recipients
• Past PA Award Recipients
• Past YM Award Recipients
• International Award Recipients
• Nominations Calendar
• OAPD Newsletter
• Fostering a Shared Vision of Professionalism
• Academic Integrity
• Addressing Professionalism Concerns
• Consultation Support for Chairs & Section Chiefs
• Policies & Codes of Conduct
• First Fridays
• Fund for Physician-Scientist Mentorship
• Grant Library
• Grant Writing Course
• Mock Study Section
• Research Paper Writing
• Establishing a Thriving Research Program
• Funding Opportunities
• Join Our Voluntary Faculty
• Child Mental Health: Fostering Wellness in Children
• Faculty Resources
• Research by Keyword
• Research by Department
• Research by Global Location
• Translational Research
• Research Cores & Services
• Program for the Promotion of Interdisciplinary Team Science (POINTS)
• CEnR Steering Committee
• Experiential Learning Subcommittee
• Goals & Objectives
• Issues List
• Print Magazine PDFs
• Print Newsletter PDFs
• YSM Events Newsletter
• Social Media
• Patient Care

INFORMATION FOR

• Residents & Fellows
• Researchers

31 Letters of Recommendation

Hello everyone,

I’ve completed my annual letter writing marathon and 31 fellowship LORs are now posted on ERAS. Although the individual letters are confidential, I thought you’d like seeing the template used to compose them (attached). The template saves time but, more importantly, ensures a consistent structure that contains all the key elements. This year’s letter changed to adhere to new AAIM guidelines (attached), but I have no doubt everyone will match extremely well as always.

Even if you’re not applying this year, look at the template to see how you are evaluated in the domains of clinical performance, scholarship, and citizenship, which is what fellowship directors care about. Although the template includes verbiage that can reflect poor or mediocre performance, most residents performed magnificently and this was richly reflected in their letters.

FYI, here’s what people are applying in this year:

• Cardiology: 2
• Endocrinology: 1
• General Internal Medicine: 1
• Heme-Onc: 6
• Informatics: 1
• National Clinical Scholars Program: 1
• Nephrology: 1
• Pulmonary & Critical Care: 5
• Rheumatology: 4

Even if you’re not applying this year, look at the template to see how you are evaluated in the domains of clinical performance, scholarship, and citizenship, which is what fellowship directors care about.

Good luck to all the candidates!

Featured in this article

• Mark David Siegel, MD Professor of Medicine (Pulmonary); Program Director, Internal Medicine Traditional Residency Program

Related Links

• Fellowship Letter of Recommendation Template
• AAIM Guidelines for Writing Fellowship Letters of Recommendation

• Utility Menu

Undergraduate Science Education at Harvard

A world of exploration. a world of expertise..

Recommendation Letters

Tips for writing letters of recommendation.

As a research mentor who works closely with students in the lab, you will likely be asked to write recommendation letters for your student for research fellowships. Below are some tips for writing good letters.

1. Be sure that the student has given you enough information about the program or fellowship for which the letter is requested. Also make sure that you will have enough time to write the letter before the deadline. It is the student’s responsibility to give you all the information you need and enough time – a few weeks is best. If they do not, you may decline to write the letter.

2. If the letter is confidential, be sure that the student has given you a preaddressed envelope that will go directly to the program and not to the student and that they have signed a waiver indicating that they will not have access to the letter or its contents.

3. If you do not think that you can write a strong or positive letter for the student because you don’t know them well enough, are not familiar with their strengths in the area specified by the program, or you do not think that they are a good fit for the program, it is a good idea to tell the student before you agree to write the letter. You may want to meet with the student to talk about the program, find out why they are applying and what you can say in support of their application. A weak or neutral letter is often worse than no letter at all. If you feel that you cannot write a good letter it may be better for the student to ask someone else.

4. Begin the letter by stating that you are recommending student X for the Y Fellowship. Then write a sentence or two indicating how long and in what connection you have known the student.

5. Direct your comments about the student to the specific interests of the program or fellowship to which they are applying. Is it purely research or are they also looking for leadership or community service activities?

6. It is a good idea to provide specific examples of the student’s qualifications for the program rather than to list their accomplishments as they appear on the student’s resume. The personal story can be more compelling than a list.

7. If you think that the student has some very positive attributes but at the same time has a problem, it is VERY helpful to the selection committee if you mention the problem or if you do not want to put confidential information in a letter, you may say that you would be willing to discuss the student in more detail by phone.

8. It is useful to the application review committee for you to discuss where you would rank this student among other students with whom you have worked. Is this student in the top 10% of students you have mentored in the lab? If you are just getting started as a mentor and recommendation letter writer, then obviously this would not be possible for you to do.

9. For some programs it is better for the student to have a letter that is signed by the lab PI or a faculty member. In this case, you may be asked by your PI to write the letter since you are working more directly with the student and can write in more detail about their commitment and abilities in the lab. Some PI’s will then ask you to co-sign the letter with them. Alternatively, the PI may ask you to write a summary of the student’s progress in the lab, but prefer to write their own letter.

10. If you are asked to write letters for a student for more than one program, make sure that the letter is adapted to reflect the specific focus of the program. And always double check to make sure that the heading, greeting and first sentence are correct for the new letter. Unfortunately, it is a common mistake to send a letter to a fellowship committee without making the editorial changes to address the committee of the new program.

11. You may be asked to write letters for more than one student for the same program; PRISE is a good example. Since the same reviewers will read these letters, it is important to make each letter as individual and personal as possible.

• Mentoring Workshops
• Reference Articles for Lab Mentors
• Student Critical Needs
• Student Mentoring Contacts
• Student Work Life Contacts
• Undergraduate Fellowships
• Undergraduate Sciences Organizations

Faculty Digital Handbook

Read the Faculty Handbook (see bookmarks).

Writing Letters of Recommendation

Faculty letters of recommendation are enormously important components of any application for a nationally competitive scholarship.  Candidates for these awards face very long odds; for many scholarships, fewer than 5% of endorsed applicants will be selected for the award. Given this level of competition, scholarship applicants must have truly exceptional letters of recommendation to stand out.

Before Writing the Letter

Before you begin writing, you should have the student complete a Student Recommendation Request Form . This form will provide you with information about the award itself, what motivates the student to apply for this award, why they think they are a good fit for it, and why they believe you are the best person to write a letter on their behalf. The form also prompts students to send you their current résumé or CV and drafts of their application essay(s). Reading the student’s essay(s) can help you assess a student’s talents and ambitions within the context of a particular scholarship.  Effective recommendation letters often amplify or expand on the points that applicants highlight in their essays.

General Guidelines for Strong Letters of Recommendation

• Discuss how long you have known the student and in what context.
• Provide concrete, specific details about the student’s academic performance and scholarly work that show you know the student well and give substance to your claims of the student’s excellence. Be wary of providing hyperbolic praise without examples. If the student is in fact extraordinary and the best student you've ever taught, say that in your letter—but substantiate your point with concrete examples of what makes the student so extraordinary.
• Letters praising good attendance, completing all readings/assignments, and receiving A grades are generally not helpful for national scholarships. Many candidates for national scholarships will share these qualities, so reviewers are looking for more substantive information on the student’s potential as an outstanding scholar and future leader in their field.
• Include rankings or comparisons of the student to peers and/or to previous students you have taught.
• Present a clear account of the ways the student fits the qualifications of the scholarship to which they are applying. One of the best ways to do this is to draw from the language used by the foundation or organization themselves.
• Make sure your final letter appears on official letterhead and is signed.
• Address your letter to the selection committee for the scholarship or fellowship (e.g. “Dear Truman Scholarship Selection Committee,”).
• Leave out information about yourself and your academic background unless it is directly pertinent to your assessment of the student and their qualifications for the scholarship.
• Don’t forget to proofread! If you are writing multiple letters for the same student, double check that your letter references the corresponding scholarship.

Saying “No”

At times, it may be appropriate to say “no” when a student requests a letter of recommendation. This may be the best response if:

• You cannot write a letter that includes positive, specific, substantive information about the student and examples of their scholarly achievements and academic performance. A generic or less than supportive letter can be detrimental to a student’s chances at receiving a competitive award.
• If you do not have the time to craft a carefully worded, highly detailed, and tailored letter.
• If the student approaches you in an unprofessional manner.

Specific Guidelines

The information below provides writers of recommendation letters with specific content suggestions for some of the awards that CFSA students may pursue. As we note above, the strongest letters are those that underscore how the student fits with the specific mission or goal of the award. Some seek students with significant leadership experience and a commitment to service. Others are focused solely on supporting students with exceptional research experience. Knowing what the foundation or organization values is pivotal when writing an effective letter.

If you have any questions regarding your letter of recommendation or the application process, please contact Jolynn Parker at [email protected] or by phone at 315-443-2091.

The Astronaut Scholarship recognizes outstanding undergraduates (sophomores or juniors) in a STEM field who are planning careers in research.  Recommenders should emphasize the applicant’s research achievements and assess their likelihood to influence and advance their field through a future career in research.  The Astronaut Scholarship Foundation values initiative, creativity, and academic excellence.

Send or deliver your completed recommendation letter, signed and on letterhead, to CFSA. Upon receiving all of the applicant’s materials, CFSA will submit them to the Astronaut Scholarship.  Syracuse University nominates two students each year for the Astronaut Scholarship.

The Beinecke Scholarship supports juniors of “exceptional promise” in the humanities, social sciences, or arts who have concrete plans to earn a graduate degree in their field.  The Beinecke Scholarship provides a substantial award to be applied toward graduate school tuition.  Recommenders should highlight students’ intellectual curiosity and character, and comment on their sincere commitment to and aptitude for graduate work and a career of research and academic or creative accomplishment. Letters should speak to students’ significant intellectual experiences, including independent research, conference presentations, exhibitions, and publications. Beinecke letters can be similar to recommendation letters to graduate school since the scholarship supports students who will succeed in graduate study and in academic careers.

Students must demonstrate a financial need to be eligible for this award. Recommenders may comment on how receiving this scholarship would significantly increase the student’s likelihood to attend graduate school if they are familiar with the applicant's circumstances.

Send or deliver your completed recommendation letter, signed and on letterhead, to CFSA. Upon receiving all of the applicant’s materials, CFSA will submit them to the Beinecke Scholarship.  Syracuse University nominates one student for the Beinecke Scholarship each year.

The Boren Fellowship and the Boren Scholarship, for graduate students and undergraduate students respectively, funds the immersive study of a critical need language through coursework and/or independent study abroad. The Boren is awarded to students focused on learning a critical need language and whose career interests align with U.S. national security. Recommenders complete a form submitted through the online application that asks the following questions:

• How long and in what capacity have you known the applicant?
• Please comment on the applicant’s academic, linguistic, and personal preparation for the study plan, especially as they relate to Boren Fellowship objectives. Please comment on the feasibility of the applicant’s ability to carry out the plan in the allotted time. If possible, comment on the applicant’s understanding of the relationship between his or her plan and U.S. national security, broadly defined, as well as his or her career interests.
• Please add anything else that you think is relevant for the reviewers to know.

Recommenders should comment on on the student’s academic, linguistic, and personal preparation for their proposed study plan, including their level of commitment to studying the target language consistently when abroad. Previous language study is not necessary but a history of successful study of the target language, or a demonstrated aptitude for language learning generally, helps to illustrate a student’s level of commitment. Recommenders should evaluate how the proposed experience abroad will prepare the applicant to achieve their career goals, including the Boren required public sector work commitment.

Applicants enter their recommenders’ email addresses into the online Embark application. Recommenders will receive an email generated from the system with login information and directions on how to submit letters of recommendations through the online application system.  Letters should be signed and on letterhead.

The James G. Gaither Junior Fellows Program, administered by the Carnegie Endowment, is designed to provide a substantive work experience for students who have a serious career interest in the area of international affairs.  Strong applicants have excellent research skills, a competitive GPA in a relevant field, and a commitment to a career in international affairs. Recommenders should speak to all of these qualities, particularly emphasizing the candidate's research and writing skills. If possible, comment on coursework or independent research directly related to the applicant's interest in a specific Carnegie Endowment project. If applicable, comment on the applicants's language skills, or other special skills or experiences relevant to the research project in which the candidate is interested.

Syracuse University may nominate two students for the Gaither Junior Fellows Program each year.  CFSA coordinates submission of Gaither Junior Fellows applications. Letters should be signed and on letterhead, and may be sent electronically or by mail to CFSA.

The Critical Language Scholarship (CLS) is an intensive overseas language and cultural immersion programs designed to promote rapid language gains in a critical need language. Recommenders should comment on the following selection criteria: academic record and potential to succeed in a rigorous academic setting; ability to adapt to a different cultural environment; plan for continuation of study of the language; and plan to use the language in future career.

Recommendations should be written as a narrative letter. In the most recent recommendation request form, writers were asked to respond to the following questions within their letters:

• How long have you known the applicant? In what capacity?
• Please comment on the applicant’s overall academic preparation and promise.
• If you are familiar with the applicant’s language-learning abilities, please comment on the applicant’s aptitude for learning a new language.
• This program requires students to study a language intensively in a situation of prolonged interaction with fellow students and to function in a challenging social and cultural environment. Please comment on the applicant’s nonacademic attributes (e.g. emotional and social maturity, motivation, adaptability, cooperation, patience, articulation, politeness, self-reliance, self-image/confidence, open-mindedness, and ability to work well within a group and relate to others).

Applicants will register contact information for recommenders in teh online application system.  Recommenders will receive an email from CLS containing a link with instructions for submitting a recommendation letter.

The German government offers a variety of scholarships and grants through the DAAD program to students, recent graduates, researchers, and professionals. Each program has a specific set of criteria for applicants. Please see the website and/or contact CFSA for detailed requirements.

For all DAAD programs, recommenders are asked to comment on:

• academic achievements
• academic and personal qualities
• (if applicable) the feasibility, relevance, quality, and planning of the student’s project
• the significance of this scholarship to the applicant’s academic and professional career goals

Recommenders should submit letters on university letterhead, signed, and in a sealed envelope to CFSA, as well as three additional copies. The letters will be attached to other application materials and sent to the scholarship’s New York office. For some programs, recommenders will also be asked to email their letter to the appropriate email address below:

Graduate study scholarship (current and rising graduate students): [email protected]

Undergraduate study scholarship: [email protected]

Research (graduate and undergraduate): [email protected]

Recommenders for students applying to one of the DAAD RISE programs must upload their letters through the online application portal.  Recommenders receive instructions by email after an applicant submits their contact information.

Competitive applicants show evidence of superior academic achievement and a high degree of promise of continuing achievement as scholars and teachers. The Ford Fellowships emphasize diversity as an educational resource and expect Fellows to engage with underrepresented communities in higher education. When possible, highlight applicants’ capacity to engage students from diverse backgrounds and sustain or encourage representation from historically underrepresented groups in learning, teaching, and scholarship at the university level.

Recommendations should expand on applicants’ personal statement and statement of previous research. It is highly recommended that you read both of these essays to provide additional detail and to shape a coherent and cohesive application.

Applicants will enter your contact information into their online application. You will receive an email notification containing your login information and requesting a letter of recommendation. Letters must be uploaded to the online application portal. All letters must be PDF files written in a standard 12-point font. Please do not include headers or footers.

Recommendation letters are considered “supplementary materials” and are therefore due by the supplementary materials deadline (generally several weeks later than the application deadline).

Recommendations should expand on applicants’ personal statement, statement of previous research and scholarly productivity, and proposed plan of graduate study. It is highly recommended that you read these essays to provide additional detail and to shape a coherent and cohesive application.

Fulbright English Teaching Assistantship recommenders will be asked to fill out and submit an electronic form rather than uploading a letter.  The Fulbright ETA recommendation form containing a series of short-answer questions that ask you to assess the candidate's communication skills, interest in teaching, ability to facilitate cultural exchange, and ability to work in unstructured environments.  Please be aware that the form has character limits and compose your responses accordingly.  Brief, single sentence answers are unlikely to be helpful--please try to make the most of the character limit available to you.

It can be helpful to read the candidate's Statement of Grant Purpose - the essay in which applicants propose how they will spend their Fulbright year - and Personal Statement before filling out the form. Strong recommendations will attest to the candidate's suitability to the ETA placement using vivid, compelling and specific examples. Fulbright notes that these letters should not merely be character references; the Commission asks recommenders to evaluate applicants’ ability to teach English in a classroom abroad.

The most recent Fulbright ETA sample reference form includes the following questions:

• Based on your observation of and experience with the applicant, comment on their ability to overcome challenges. (120 words or approx. 10 lines)
• In your view, how has this applicant demonstrated qualities associated with teaching or mentoring? (120 words or approx. 10 lines)
• Based on your observation, how might the applicant interact with students, faculty, and community members, among others, in an unfamiliar or unstructured situation or in a different cultural environment? (120 lines or approx. 10 lines)
• What kind of impression, in your view, would the applicant make as a representative of the United States abroad? (120 words or approx. 10 lines)
• Please comment on any other factors which you believe may have a bearing on the applicant's potential to have a successful experience abroad as a Fulbright ETA (comments regarding academic and/or personal experience, maturity, adaptability and flexibility are welcome). (120 words or approx. 10 lines)

References will receive an email from the Fulbright Application system after the applicant has submitted your contact information. Follow the link and the instructions in the email to log in to the online application system. References must be submitted online through this system.

For further instructions and tips, visit Fulbright's Instructions for ETA Recommendation Writers .

Recommenders should highlight applicants’ maturity, adaptability,  (the student will need to persevere through any culture shock or other emotional obstacles), and motivation. Strong letters will address a candidate’s academic and linguistic preparation for the proposed project or study program, and ability to adapt to a different cultural environment. You should also consider the applicant’s likelihood of making a favorable impression of the United States as a cultural ambassador.

It will be useful to take a look at the applicant's Statement of Grant Purpose – the essay in which applicants propose how they will spend their Fulbright year – and Personal Statement. Strong letters will confirm that the candidate's proposed project is feasible and has merit. Letters should speak to an applicant’s level of knowledge and potential for future growth, their research skills (if applicable), as well as their ability to think and write analytically. Fulbright notes that study/research recommendation letters should not merely be character references; the Commission asks recommenders to evaluate applicants’ ability to complete the proposed project.

Only comment on what you feel prepared to comment on or what falls within your area of experience/expertise. For example, while recommenders are asked by the Fulbright Commission to comment on an applicant’s linguistic ability, do not feel compelled to comment if you are unsure of or do not know your student’s linguistic ability.

Vivid, compelling, and specific examples illustrating your assessment of the applicant’s project and character are essential to a candidate’s success in this competition.

Recommenders will receive an email from the Fulbright Application system after the applicant has submitted their contact information. Prepare your letter as a Word document or a PDF, on institutional letterhead and signed. Log in to the online application system using the login information in the Embark email and upload your letter to the system. Letters of recommendation must be submitted online through this system.

For further instructions and tips, visit Fulbright's Instructions for Study/Research Recommendation Writers .

The Fulbright Commission lists “evidence of leadership qualities and initiative, academic ability, character, adaptability and ambassadorial qualities, as well as an interest in the UK and its culture.” Ideally, recommenders will be able to speak to and highlight these characteristics, as well as comment on how the specific program goals align with the student’s academic goals. Students should tell you which program they are pursuing.

Letters should be written specifically for this Fulbright application (the US-UK Fulbright Commission especially discounts any recommendations that appear to be generic in content). Letters will be pasted into an online submission form. All references must be submitted through this form. Applicants should direct referees to the form.

The Gates Cambridge requires three letters of recommendation; two are academic and one is a personal reference which specifically addresses the Gates criteria. The applicant should indicate which letter you are providing.

References are submitted by the referee via an Electronic Reference System, which referees have access to after the student registers the referee in the University of Cambridge GRADSAF online application.

Equally weighted, the Gates criteria include: outstanding intellectual ability; leadership potential; a commitment to improving the lives of others; a good fit between the applicant's qualifications and aspirations and the postgraduate program at Cambridge for which they are applying

Academic reference:

The letter should not be pro forma; discuss the student’s suitability for their chosen program at Cambridge. Selectors consistently indicate that they look for specific actions rather than general qualities, with detailed evidence or suggestive anecdotes to support adjectives. Straightforward letters about the student doing all of the coursework, writing good papers, and getting good grades are not helpful. In fact, boilerplate letters with general praise probably hurt a student more than they help in this competition.

Explain how long and in what capacity you have known the student and clarify where the student ranks in relation to other students you have taught or worked with. If possible, the letter might compare the student with other students who have gone on to top graduate/professional programs.

Please discuss the student’s research interests and projects you have supervised. Be specific in relating instances of academic achievement, be it in a classroom, laboratory, or individual setting. If describing research or a final paper, the letter should help the committee understand its significance and the contribution it has made. If the candidate performed highly efficient lab work, explain if and why that particular work was especially challenging. Is there evidence of creativity and innovation in the candidate’s approach to answering questions or solving problems?

A commitment to improving the lives of others: Discuss the implication's of the student's work and future goals in relation to community and public service. Comment on the prospects for the student to play an influential part in the betterment of society at a local or global level through both their scholarly and personal activities.

A good fit between the applicant's qualifications and aspirations and the postgraduate program at Cambridge for which they are applying: How does the proposed academic program fit the candidate’s scholarly and career plans? Make it clear that the applicant has the potential to perform well in his or her chosen program of study, knowing that students will be expected to work much more independently than in a US program. Explain how study at Cambridge will make a difference in the student’s intellectual growth.

Personal reference:

Outstanding intellectual ability: What is the potential for the student to be a productive member of the discipline? Note any evidence of the candidate's growth over time and how you see potential for further growth.

Leadership potential: Remark upon the leadership qualities of the applicant. Describe the student’s personality, work habits and interpersonal skills. Has s/he built productive relationships with people, engaging with them in his/her field or beyond? Does s/he appreciate the needs, motives and concerns of others? Is the student self‐confident and able to seize opportunities?

A commitment to improving the lives of others: Discuss the work of the student in relation to community and public service. Comment on the prospects for the student to play an influential part in the betterment of society at a local or global level through both their scholarly and personal activities. Non-academic examples might include events organized by the student and volunteer work that demonstrates the candidate’s commitment to helping others.

A good fit between the applicant's qualifications and aspirations and the postgraduate program at Cambridge for which they are applying: How does the proposed academic program fit the candidate’s scholarly and career plans? Make it clear that the applicant has the potential to perform well in his or her chosen program of study, knowing that students will be expected to work much more independently than in a US program. Explain how study at Cambridge will make a difference in the student’s intellectual growth; like the student’s application essay, the letters can help demonstrate a consistent story line of where the students have come from, where they are now and why they ought to be going to this program.

Goldwater referees should comment on the following criteria:

• potential and intent for a career in mathematics, the natural sciences, or those engineering disciplines that contribute significantly to technological advances
• the ability and desire to pursue advanced degrees in the sciences and engineering
• developed career objectives and involvement in an academic program that fosters the student’s ability to make a significant contribution to the chosen field
• demonstrated outstanding academic performance, maturity, initiative, and motivation

Successful letters present the student as a mature researcher and express confidence in the applicant’s research abilities and desire to pursue an advanced degree. Winners are expected to contribute significantly to their fields and display intellectual intensity in their disciplines. It is acceptable for references to provide details of a student’s research to present context, significance, or demonstrating the student’s personality or achievements. However, referees should avoid getting too detailed, clinical, or impersonal with their letters.

Recommendations are submitted online. You will be emailed instructions immediately after the applicant submits the application.

The Hertz Fellowship is one of the most prestigious fellowships available to graduate students in the applied physical, biological, and engineering sciences. Given the financial value and freedom offered by the award, it is extremely competitive and selective.

Hertz Fellows make a unique moral commitment to apply their "skills available to the United States in times of national emergency.” Although the Foundation does not offer a definition for “national emergency,” it lists several examples, including fuel shortages, transportation or communication system overloads, deterioration of environmental quality, and malevolent use of cyberspace. Fellows are charged with responding to these “emergencies” if and when they personally determine that they pose a threat to the United States. That said, the Hertz has a hint of patriotism incorporated into its values and selection process. Referees may want to consider this when writing letters.

The Hertz Fellowship uses the following criteria to screen applicants. References should speak to these cri

• exceptional intelligence and creativity, with particular emphasis on those aspects pertinent to technical endeavors
• excellent technical education evidenced not only by transcripts and reference reports from senior technical professionals, but also by the results of a personal, technical interview
• orientation and commitment to the applications of the physical sciences
• extraordinary accomplishment in technical or related professional studies, which may offset slightly lower academic records, or add luster to outstanding ones
• features of temperament and character conducive to high attainment as a technical professional(the assessment of which is difficult, albeit important to the Foundation)
• appropriate moral and ethical values(of considerable interest to the Foundation in the furthering of its basic goals)
• leverage(what difference the award of the Hertz Fellowship is likely to make in the kind, quality, and/or personal creativity of the student's graduate research)

References must submit the requested Reference Report through an online portal. After the applicant has registered you as a referee, you will receive an email with the necessary access ID and password. Follow the directions in this email to submit your Reference Report. You must use the Hertz Fellowship’s format to answer specific questions presented through the online portal.

The Luce Scholars Program awards recent graduates with a professional placement and language training in Asia. The program is for young professionals who have had limited exposure to Asia. Although candidates may have taken Asian language or Asia-focused courses and may have spent up to 12 weeks in Asia, it is not helpful (and may be harmful) for you to emphasize an applicant’s familiarity or expertise in Asia.

Because the Luce Scholars Program is experiential rather than academic in nature, personal qualities such as flexibility, adaptability, creativity, humility, openness to new ideas, and sensitivity to cultural differences are as important as academic achievement. You should emphasize all relevant personal characteristics in your letter.

Luce Scholars demonstrate an outstanding capacity for leadership and have a record of high achievement. They have mature and clearly defined career interests with evidence of potential for professional accomplishments. Recommenders should reference these criteria in their letters of recommendation. Explain how participation in the Luce program fits the candidate’s scholarly and career plans. Make it clear that the applicant has the potential to perform well in a professional placement in an Asian country, knowing that Scholars will be placed in extremely different business and linguistic environments. Explain how exposure to Asia and the ability to come to know Asian culture will make a difference in the student’s professional and intellectual growth. Like the student’s application essay, the letters can help demonstrate a consistent story line of where the students have come from, where they are now and why they ought to be going to Asia.

Please note that nominees are not judged on whether they have developed specific plans for experience abroad. A candidate may have general ideas about the kind of placement preferred, but this is not considered as either a negative or positive factor.

Straightforward letters about the student completing coursework work, writing good papers, and earning good grades are not very helpful. In fact, boilerplate letters with general praise probably hurt a student more than they help in this competition.

Letters must be signed and sent (as a hard copy) to CFSA. The letters will be added to the candidate’s application and then sent directly to Luce.

Created to honor James Madison’s legacy, Madison Fellows supports graduate study for social science teachers in grades 7-12. The Program seeks to improve teaching about the US Constitution in secondary schools. Recommenders should read the candidate’s application essays and are highly encouraged to discuss specific attributes, personal qualities, and professional accomplishments that were not addressed elsewhere in the application.

Recommendations must be submitted online. You will receive an email with instructions for completing the online recommendation after the applicant submits your contact information.

Candidates for the Marshall are evaluated based on three selection criteria: academic merit, leadership potential, and ambassadorial potential. Reviewers look for candidates who have the potential to excel as scholars, as leaders and as contributors to improved UK-US understanding, especially students who will be active in their host university. For a more detailed review of the selection criteria, see the  Marshall Scholarship - Candidate Evaluation Criteria .

Recommenders should include frank, detailed, and focused evaluations of the candidate, including reviews of the candidate’s character and self-esteem. You may include how the student’s “fares” by criteria outside of academics and university life. Recommendations should explain how studying in the UK in the applicant’s proposed course of study will benefit their future career and prepare them to contribute significantly to society.

Applicants elect one of their recommenders as the “preferred recommender,” who should have supervised the applicant’s university training/study. All recommenders, if possible, are encouraged to evaluate the candidate’s academic proposal and how the proposed academic program fits with the candidate’s academic and career goals. However, the “preferred recommender” is expected to speak to the candidate’s adequate preparation for the proposed course of study.

Marshall reviewers find recommendations without any acknowledgement of a student’s weaknesses to be suspect and therefore discredit them. Be careful of hyperbole and stay specific. It is appropriate to incorporate criticism and a discussion of the student’s areas for growth into this recommendation. It may be helpful to read about constructive ways to incorporate criticism here .

After logging in through the provided URL (sent via email), you will be able to type or copy and paste your recommendation into a form. You will also have full access to the candidate’s application. The word limit for your letter is 1000 words, and a word count facility has been provided.

For more guidance and suggestions on writing a recommendation letter for a Marshall candidate, please contact CFSA.

Applicants are judged on three criteria: scholarship, leadership, and a sustained commitment to community and public service. More specifically, Mitchell selectors are looking for the following criteria and all three fields are equally important:

• Demonstrated record of intellectual distinction, and strong preparation for the proposed course of study;
• Character, integrity, generosity of spirit, leadership; and
• Sustained commitment to service and community, indicating potential for future leadership and contribution to society.

Make sure to include leadership and service directly, and feel free to define these broadly. Evaluate how the student’s proposed academic program fits into the candidate’s scholarly and career plans. Explain how study in Ireland will make a difference in the student’s intellectual growth; like the student’s application essay, the letters can help demonstrate a consistent story line of where the students have come from, where they are now and why they ought to be going to this particular graduate program in Ireland.

The Mitchell Scholarship funds a small cohort of scholars to study in Ireland each year. The small size makes it a more personal program, so application readers are especially interested in applicants’ character. Do not hesitate to include specifics when evaluating a student’s character.

While it is not necessary, it is highly encouraged to include peace and conflict issues in Ireland and US-Irish history and their relevance to the student’s course of study or career goals if appropriate. Mitchell scholars serve as cultural ambassadors and must demonstrate a desire to get to know the culture and people of Ireland and Northern Ireland.

Mitchell reviewers find recommendations without any acknowledgement of a student’s weaknesses to be suspect and therefore discredit them. Be careful of hyperbole and stay specific. The Mitchell Scholarship recommends that references are forthright and acknowledge an applicant’s limitations and potential for growth. It may be helpful to read about constructive ways to incorporate criticism here .

Recommenders will receive a link to submit their letter of recommendation online. You may either type directly into the text field or copy and paste from a recommendation written in a word processing program. Please note that there is no special formatting in the long text fields provided (bold text, indentation, etc. will be stripped). The web browser will time out every 20 minutes, so save your recommendation if you are typing it directly into the online field.

For more guidance and suggestions on writing a recommendation letter for a Mitchell candidate, please contact CFSA.

Rising juniors spend five weeks at George Washington’s Mount Vernon learning from experienced corporate, government, and military leaders. The leadership development program culminates in a community service-focused capstone project.

Letters should speak to the candidate’s character, academic achievement, and leadership potential. The program is looking for young adults “of action” who will commit themselves to a cause they believe in. When possible, share details about how your applicant has shown excitement, passion, and creativity when encountering a challenge. Comment on the student’s sense of adventure and vision.

Because all Fellows complete a capstone project, it is recommended that references speak to the applicant’s ability to prepare and pursue an action plan around a central cause. If possible, discuss the applicant’s past work on this cause.

Recommendations are sent by email to [email protected] and can be addressed to the Manager of the Leadership Fellows, Amanda Hadad. Please write the subject line as “Recommendation for Firstname Lastname.”

This unique dual-mentored program supports doctoral study and research both at the National Institutes of Health and either the University of Oxford or Cambridge.

Letters of recommendation are weighed especially heavily in the application process, particularly letters written by research mentors. Because of the intensive nature of the program, recommenders should comment on the applicant’s organizational, time management, and research skills. Referees should also speak to the student’s focus, drive, and intellect, as well as the applicant’s potential for a productive career in the biomedical sciences.

NIH OxCam administrators outline a number of criteria for selecting recipients. Not all of the criteria below are necessary, but they will bolster the applicant’s application. Letters of recommendation should comment on these criteria when possible. It is highly recommended that referees read the applicant’s personal statement and expand on the themes therein to help craft a cohesive and coherent application.

• Academic achievements
• Substantial research experience (This is one of the best predictive factors for success in the program. The Director of Admissions notes that most successful applicants worked in a laboratory during college and it is not unusual for applicants to have at least two to three years of research experience.)
• Scientific publications (co-authored manuscripts, poster presentations, conference participation)
• Honors and awards from the university or outside agencies

Referees will receive an email request for a letter of recommendation after the applicant has entered recommenders’ contact information and has saved the application. Letters must be submitted through the online application.

The NSF GRFP considers two overarching criteria – intellectual merit and broader impacts – and gives the following guidelines:

Intellectual Merit : The intellectual merit criterion includes demonstrated intellectual ability and other accepted requisites for scholarly scientific study, such as the ability to: (1) plan and conduct research; (2) work as a member of a team as well as independently; and (3) interpret and communicate research findings. Panelists are instructed to consider: the strength of the academic record, the proposed plan of research, the description of previous research experience, the appropriateness of the choice of references and the extent to which they indicate merit, Graduate Record Examinations (GRE) General and Subject Tests scores, and the appropriateness of the choice of institution for fellowship tenure relative to the proposed plan of research.

Broader Impacts : The broader impacts criterion includes contributions that (1) effectively integrate research and education at all levels, infuse learning with the excitement of discovery, and assure that the findings and methods of research are communicated in a broad context and to a large audience; (2) encourage diversity, broaden opportunities, and enable the participation of all citizens—women and men, underrepresented minorities, and persons with disabilities—in science and research; (3) enhance scientific and technical understanding; and (4) benefit society. Applicants may provide characteristics of their background, including personal, professional, and educational experiences, to indicate their potential to fulfill the broader impacts criterion.

It is especially important for NSF GRFP recommendation writers to read their student’s graduate research plan and to focus on the student’s ability to contribute significantly to their field. Recommenders should discuss the student as a scientist/mathematician/engineer. In addition to noting the applicant’s publications, lab work, and teaching (if applicable), recommenders should speak to the applicant’s temperament and resourcefulness, as well as comment on how the applicant has or could represent the university well at recruiting events, presentations, or conferences. Feel free to share your opinion of the applicant’s potential for future significant achievement. Discuss the unique qualities or activities of the applicant; help your student stand out from the crowd.

Unlike other recommendation letters, it is appropriate and sometimes necessary to give some scientific detail and background to provide context for the student’s research goals and/or previous work.

GRFP reference letters may be up to two pages in length. If possible, submit your letter on letterhead. Letters should be signed, prepared on standard 8.5” x 11” page size, and use 12-point Times New Roman or Computer Modern font.

Letters must be submitted through the Fastlane online application portal. Referees will receive an email with instructions on submitting letters through this portal after the applicant completes the appropriate section of the application.

For further information and tips from NSF GRFP, see their reference requirements here .

Both the Payne and the Rangel Fellowships fund a combined graduate study, internship, and mentorship program for students interested in pursuing a career in the Foreign Service. The Payne Fellowship prepares award recipients for work in the USAID specifically while the Rangel Fellowship presents a pathway into the Foreign Service more broadly. The fellowships have different deadlines, but they share selection criteria and are both administered by Howard University. Letters of recommendation have the same parameters and submission protocol. However, Payne Fellowship applicants and referees must speak specifically to the applicant’s interest, commitment, and suitability to working for the USAID.

The selection panels for these awards judge applicants on several criteria, including: clear interest in a Foreign Service career with the U.S. Department of State; academic background and achievement; potential to succeed in graduate school; commitment to service; leadership skills; financial need for graduate school; diverse interests in areas such as international affairs and government; cultural sensitivity; writing skills; resourcefulness; integrity; composure; and an ability to overcome obstacles.

Referees should speak to the applicant’s strengths, particularly of the skills in the chart below. Make sure to comment on the applicant’s potential to succeed in graduate school and the Foreign Service. Referees are also invited to comment on the applicant’s areas for improvement.

Of the two letters of recommendation required for these scholarships, one should come from a faculty member, and one should come from a community leader. These referees should speak to different qualifications. The community leader should comment on an applicant's non-academic accomplishments and potential, including work ethic, initiative, dependability, composure, goal-orientation, inter-personal skills, etc. Examples of community leaders could include an internship supervisor, a faculty advisor for a student organization, or a work employer or supervisor. The faculty reference should speak to the student’s academic performance and likelihood to excel in the chosen graduate program.

Referees will receive an email with directions and a recommendation form. You are asked to both provide a narrative recommendation as well as ranking the applicant in several criteria in the provided chart:

Letters of recommendation should be limited to 12-point font or larger and should not exceed two pages.

Letters of recommendation for the Pickering Fellowship at both the undergraduate and the graduate levels should reference the “ 13 dimensions ” of a Foreign Service Officer. Whenever possible, speak to these qualities in your student. Referees should explain why the applicant is uniquely qualified for the fellowship and, if possible, the applicant’s potential to thrive in a graduate program.

Once the applicant has submitted your email address, you will receive an email from The Washington Center, which administers the Pickering application process. The email will direct you to an online form where you will enter some basic information and upload your letter.

CFSA highly recommends that referees read the applicant’s personal statement before crafting a letter of recommendation to help shape a coherent and cohesive application.

The Rhodes criteria include:

Applicants are also more competitive if they can demonstrate a desire and a need to study at Oxford and their specific program of choice.

The Rhodes Trust requires applicants to submit at least five but no more than eight letters of recommendation. At least four of these letters must come from academic instructors at the undergraduate or graduate level, and at least one letter must speak to an applicant’s character. Because of the high number of recommendations, it is important for recommenders to get detailed in how you know and have worked with the student, and to show concrete evidence that this student is among the nation’s best. Address what is most relevant to you, your discipline, and your relationship with the applicant.

Recommenders must distinguish what makes the student especially accomplished and especially able to influence the nation (now or in the future). If possible, emphasize the student’s public service and athletic ability

Rhodes reviewers find recommendations without any acknowledgement of a student’s weaknesses to be suspect and therefore discredit them. Be careful of hyperbole and stay specific. It is appropriate to incorporate criticism and a discussion of the student’s areas for growth into this recommendation. It may be helpful to read about constructive ways to incorporate criticism here .

The student will register you as a recommender in the online application system. The Rhodes online application system will send an email with instructions for submitting your letter by the national deadline. The letter should be signed and on letterhead. Address your letter to the Rhodes Scholarship Selection Committee.

For more guidance and suggestions on writing a recommendation letter for a Rhodes candidate, please contact CFSA.

For guidance and suggestions on writing a recommendation letter for a St. Andrew’s candidate, please contact CFSA.

New in the 2016-2017 academic year, the Schwarzman Scholars program requires four letters of recommendation. For current students, one of these letters comes from the institution and provides context for university-specific awards, grading systems, extracurricular activities, scholarships, etc.

All referees should comment on the applicant’s leadership qualities, experience, and potential. If possible, speak to the candidate’s ability to thrive in an intensive academic and cross-cultural setting. Although the scholarship only has one cohort of successful applicants thus far, the award winners are all extraordinarily high-achieving, innovative, and risk-taking students.

Submitted in narrative form, Schwarzman requests that letters address the following questions:

• How long have you know the candidate and in what capacity?
• How does this candidate’s intellectual and academic abilities compare to other students from your institution? Does s/he demonstrate broad interests, sharp insights on complex issues, flexibility of thinking, and curiosity about the world? To the extent that your knowledge of the candidate permits, please provide specific examples.
• Please describe this candidate’s personal characteristics and experiences that will contribute to her/his potential to take on leadership roles in the future. How does this candidate compare to others who have gone on to leadership positions after studying/working/volunteering with you?

After the applicant has completed and saved the recommendations portion of the online application, referees will receive an email with instructions on how to upload letters of recommendations online. All letters must be submitted electronically.

Successful applicants demonstrate exceptional academic achievement and a strong interest in peace and security issues. Candidates have preferably completed graduate study, a college major, extensive coursework or independent reading that relates directly to the fellowship’s subject of focus. Selectors especially seek out candidates with experience in public-interest activism and/or advocacy, particularly if these activities relate to peace and security issues. The fellowship gives preference to applicants without substantial experience in Washington, DC public-interest or governmental work.

Letters of reference should address: the accomplishments and standing of the candidate; the candidate’s interest and experience in international peace and security issues; the candidate’s ability to communicate, both orally and in writing; the candidate’s maturity and judgment, and the candidate’s potential to make a significant contribution to peace and security issues.

Referees may submit their letters either directly to Scoville (at [email protected] ) or to CFSA, where the letters will be bundled with the student’s other application materials. Signatures are preferred but are not required. The letter must be submitted as an attached Word of PDF document rather than in the body of the email. Please title the document “Last name of applicant-Last name of letter writer.” In certain cases, Scoville will (reluctantly) accept paper references.

Soros Fellows are selected as examples of the richness that refugees and immigrants contribute to the United States. The Soros Fellowship program awards especially promising New Americans in an effort to “level the playing field.” In addition to suggesting that all referees read the applicant’s essays (which are unique to the Soros Fellowship application), Soros offers the following suggestions for recommenders:

• Highlight how an applicant meets the Fellowship's criteria, which emphasize creativity, initiative, originality and sustained accomplishment.
• Explore the applicant's commitment to the Bill of Rights and Constitution, or more broadly, their sense of citizenship in a community.
• Contextualize the challenges, opportunities and choices that an applicant has faced, whether they are cultural or educational.
• Educate the reader about an applicant's field or sub-field, and the level of an applicant's strengths and work within that context.
• Describe the extent of the applicant's promise of significant contributions to US society, culture or their respective academic field.
• Explain the relevance an applicant's graduate training to his or her long-term career goals, and of potential value in enhancing his or her future accomplishments.

Once an applicant registers you as a recommender, you will receive an email from the online application system directing you to the “Recommender Registration” page. After registering, you will be able to upload your letter of recommendation. Please save and upload your letter as a PDF or a Word document. You cannot type the recommendation directly into the online system.

The Tillman Scholars program supports American active-duty service members, veterans and military spouses.   Only one character recommendation is required for Tillman applicants.

Tillman Scholars are chosen based on the following criteria: record of personal achievement, academic and career ambitions, demonstration of service to others in the community, desire to continue to serve others and make a positive impact on your community, leadership potential, compelling, thoughtful, genuine and thorough essay question responses, record of military service and/or community impact as a military spouse. It is recommended that referees speak to these criteria and read the applicant’s essay to help craft a cohesive and coherent application.

Applicants must submit the name and contact information of one referee. After doing so, the referee will receive log-in information from the Pat Tillman Foundation and will answer “three standardized short questions” about the candidate’s character. Each question has a maximum word count of no more than 200 words. No separate letters are required.

Successful applicants usually demonstrate an extensive record of campus and community service, commitment to a career in government, nonprofit, or advocacy, communication skills, a high probability of becoming a “change agent,” and a strong academic record with likely acceptance to the graduate school of the candidate’s choice. In general, the record of campus and community service and the commitment to a career in public service are the most important criteria. Letter writers should focus on these two criteria. It is important to read through the student’s application essays to align your recommendation letter with the applicant’s goals written therein.

Truman applicants submit three letters of recommendation. Each letter addresses one of three selection criteria outlined below. References are welcome to address more than one criteria in one letter, but you must address the criteria written on the cover sheet provided to you by the student. It may be helpful to know who the other letter writers are and the angle they are taking so you can provide a different perspective.

• Leadership Abilities and Potential:   This letter should confirm the experience described in Question 7 (specific example of your leadership).  The letter writer need not have witnessed the example first hand, but he or she should be able to discuss the example and how it fits within the context of the student's leadership.
•   Commitment to a Career in Public Service:   This letter should confirm the experience described in Question 8 (recent, satisfying public service activity).  The letter writer need not have witnessed the activity first hand, but he or she should be able to discuss the example and how it fits within the context of the student's commitment to a career in public service.
•   Intellect and Prospects for Continuing Academic Success:   This letter should discuss the student's overall academic background in context of the student's future plans for career and graduate school (Questions 11 to 13).  It is recommended, though not required, that the writer have taught the student at some point.

Unlike many other scholarships, the Truman Scholarship does not shy away from students who are comfortable with public abrasion; in fact, the Foundation celebrates these students. Truman Scholars are expected to be the movers and shakers of the future. Do not be afraid to incorporate anecdotes or other specific examples that speak to the applicant’s fervor or comfort with public abrasion.

Letters should be addressed to the Truman Selection Committee and should not be more than two pages. Complete and sign the cover sheet provided by the student, attach your letter of recommendation, and send or deliver the letter to CFSA. CFSA will package all application materials together and send them to the Truman Scholarship Foundation.

It is especially helpful to read the student’s prepared essays before writing a recommendation letter for the Udall Scholarship. Applicants must prepare several responses that clearly articulate their personal background, educational and career plans, as well as an essay applying Congressman Udall’s achievements to the applicant’s own background. These responses can provide excellent substance, and tying the content of these responses into your letter can have a big impact on the reader. Refer to the applicant’s written materials when you can.

It is important to be very clear about the student’s relation to their chosen topic (environmental issues, tribal health care, tribal policy, Native American issues). Tailor your letter to reflect the student’s interest and commitment to the topic.

In addition to the suggestions above, recommenders should include the following criteria in their letters: evidence of academic success and confidence in future academic success; communication skills, especially those that may be used to contribute to the applicant’s chosen field; confidence about the student’s potential to contribute significantly contributions to the chosen field. Candidates who most often stand out are those that demonstrate a commitment to activities, volunteerism, and leadership.

Udall selection committee members warn references not to focus too much on the content of the scholarship or Congressman Udall. If you choose to do so, relate the information back to the applicant as soon as possible.

Letter writers are recommended to keep their letters to one page. Recommenders should send their letters to CFSA via email. CFSA will upload them to the online application portal.

Two Students Selected for Prestigious Fulbright UK Summer Institutes

Record number receive awards through fulbright u.s. student program, three earn national science foundation graduate research fellowships, young research fellow angelina lim creates orangereels film festival, seeks submissions for 2024, 5 students receive prestigious critical language scholarship.

• Next »

A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

• What Fellows Do
• Fellows' Stories
• Applying to Mentor a Fellow

Prepare & Submit Fellowship Application

• The CDC E-learning Institute (ELI) is a six-month e-learning fellowship open to public health professionals who develop training products at state, local, territorial, or tribal health departments in the U.S.
• Applicants should gather contact and education information, training and skills, and work or volunteer experience before starting the application process.

Before applying

Before beginning their ELI application, interested applicants should gather the following information:

• Contact information
• Education information
• Post-graduate training and skills
• Work and volunteer experience

Additionally, applicants should prepare:

• A personal statement
• A sample of the content they want to develop
• A letter of recommendation from a supervisor

Personal statement

Write a personal statement by answering the following recommended questions in essay form:

• Why are you interested in this fellowship?
• What makes you a good candidate?
• How do you anticipate using the concepts and skills learned in this fellowship?
• What are the two most important skills you want to develop or improve?
• What do you believe are facilitators at your organization for developing e-learning?
• What are barriers at your organization for developing e-learning?
• What is your proficiency using e-learning software?

Note that there is a 300-word limit for each question.

Sample content

Applicants should create a sample of the content they hope to work on for the fellowship. The sample should be a .doc or .pdf file that can be uploaded. The sample can also be a web link.

The applicant's organization should own and approve of the content for development into an e-learning product.

Letter of recommendation

The applicant's supervisor should complete a standardized letter of recommendation. This can be done online.

• The letter should be written by an immediate supervisor familiar with the applicant's achievements, aspirations, and professional attributes.
• Recommendations must be written in English.

E-learning Institute Fellowship

CDC’s E-learning Institute (ELI) is a 6-month online fellowship with access to CDC-developed materials and subject matter experts, plus learning from peers.

National and International Fellowships at Brown

Fellowships at Brown supports all undergraduates in pursuing national and international fellowships and scholarships based on their academic, professional, and extracurricular interests and goals

From Exploration to Application

Fellowships at Brown offers holistic, inclusive advising to guide and support you in the process of identifying and applying for a fellowship or scholarship. Meet with us to explore opportunities that fund domestic and international research and travel, teaching and public service, and post-baccalaureate degrees. Start your journey below!

Getting Started

Find a fellowship, prepare your application, connect with us, meet with us in-person or via zoom.

We offer one-on-one appointments each week to explore fellowship opportunities  

Sign up for an appointment

• Contact and Staff
• Subscribe to our mailing list

Upcoming Events and Deadlines

• Call for Applications: WACSI Research Fellowship 2024

Published: 17 May 2024 174 views

The West Africa Civil Society Institute (WACSI) was created to reinforce the institutional, operational and knowledge capacities of civil society in the region as well as enhance knowledge on civil society in the region. WACSI serves as a resource hub for training, research and documentation, experience sharing, and policy dialogue for organised civil society in West Africa.

The fellowship is open to all young researchers from West Africa. Other young researchers who are not from the region but are interested in understanding and documenting civil society praxis in West Africa can be considered.

• Table of Content

About West Africa Civil Society Institute (WACSI)

Research fellowship, aim and benefits of research fellowship, requirements for research fellowship qualification, interview date, process and venue for research fellowship, documents required for application, application deadline, how to apply.

The West Africa Civil Society Institute (WACSI) was established by the Open Society Initiative for West Africa (OSIWA) in 2005 to reinforce the capacities of civil society in the sub-region. The Institute became operational in July 2007. Their vision: A peaceful and prosperous West Africa where development is driven by its people. Their mission: We strengthen civil society in West Africa to be responsive, collaborative, representative, resilient and influential through knowledge sharing, learning, connecting and influencing. WACSI’s core values are the driving force of its operational...... continue reading

• Active participation in this fellowship offers fellows with a keen interest in civil society access to a wide range of benefits to help successfully conduct their research or engage in a knowledge documentation project. 
• Fellows will be assigned to mentors who will guide them throughout the fellowship. 
• The research findings and the fellows' experience will be used to promote good practices in West Africa and beyond. 
• Research fellows will receive monthly stipends and a research allowance from the Institute. 
• Fellows are provided with a wealth of opportunities, skills and knowledge to better plan for or advance their future careers. 
• Candidates would develop at least one WACSeries publication that will be published on the Institute’s website. 
• Official recommendation from WACSI. 
• Free access to WACSI's publications. 
• The fellowship is open to all young researchers from West Africa. Other young researchers who are not from the region but are interested in understanding and documenting civil society praxis in West Africa can be considered. 
• Candidates interested in working on topical issues related to civil society are highly encouraged to apply. The Institute is keen on having candidates interested on topics related to the following: 
• Local philanthropy,  
• Technology for development,   
• The localisation agenda,   
• Decolonisation of aid,   
• Resource mobilisation,   
• Civil society sustainability,   
• Shift the power,   
• Leadership and succession,   
• Strategic partnerships and   
• Capacity strengthening for civil society in West Africa.  
• Current master's or PhD students and/or graduates who completed their master’s or PhD studies within the last two years. 
• Applicants must demonstrate strong analytical skills and the ability to perform independent research. 
• Interested applicants should be able and ready to cover all costs related to the fellowship. 
• Applicants must be able to communicate fluently either in English and/or French. French speaking candidates are highly encouraged to apply.  

Deliverable

• Production of at least two publishable research reports or policy documents. This can be either an Issue Paper , an Op-Ed and/or blogs articles . 
• Contribution to ongoing research conducted and or commissioned by the Institute. 
• Documentation of best practices, case studies and/or success stories. 

Fellowship Duration 

 The fellowship duration is six months (July – December 2024). This will be based on the alignment of the fellowship goals with the student's current academic, career and/or research interests. However, applicants can be selected on a case-by-case basis. 

Timelines  

6 May 2024: Application opens. 

31 May 2024: Deadline for receipt of applications. 

7 June 2024: Shortlisted applicants are notified by email. 

19 June 2024: Interview with shortlisted applicants. 

25 June 2024: Selected candidates will receive feedback on their applications. 

1 July 2024: Beginning of the research fellowship. Selected fellows can however discuss start dates per their specific cases. 

Interested candidates should submit the following: 

• A motivation letter stating their duration and theme of interest 
• A curriculum vitae 
• A synopsis of not more than one page on the specific theme of interest you would be working on during your fellowship 
• Sample of an authored article or paper. Provide evidence of any published works if available. 

For more details, visit  WACSI website.

Scholarships You May Like

• Fellowship scholarships
• West Africa Civil Society Institute (WACSI) scholarships
• Scholarships for African Students
• Scholarships in Ghana

Latest Scholarships

• GroundUp Fellowship 2024 (Up to R42,500 per month)
• Sony Women in Technology Award with Nature 2024 (Up to $250,000 prize)
• Cassava Republic Press Global Black Women’s Non-Fiction Manuscript Prize 2024 (Up to $20,000)
• Apply Now: Breakthrough Junior Challenge for Students Worldwide 2024
• University of Tasmania M Rushforth Scholarship 2024 (Up to $10,000)
• Nature Awards 2024 Microbiome Accelerator Call for Application (Up to $10,000 grant)
• Chinese Government Scholarship-Silk Road Scholarship Program 2024
• TotalEnergies Graduate Internship Programme for South Africans 2024
• Ashoka Young African Climate Changemakers Challenge 2024
• Best Scholarships
• Sanlam Actuarial Bursaries for South Africans 2025
• UNICEF Internship Programme for Students and Graduates 2024
• University of Pretoria Queen Elizabeth Commonwealth Scholarship for Master studies 2025 (Fully funded)
• IEG Fellowships for Doctoral Students 2025
• Mastercard Foundation Graduate Scholars Program at University of Gondar 2024
• University of Surrey MBA scholarship for Postgraduate Students 2024
• University of Sheffield Africa Scholarship for Postgraduate Students from Africa 2024
• Apply Now: Australian Government Research Training Program (AGRTP) Scholarship 2024

Scholarship Tips

• 30 Best Medical Universities In The US 2024
• Tips To Find And Apply For Scholarships Online
• 30 Best Study Techniques To Try This 2024
• 26 Best Country To Teach English 2024
• 26 Best Free AI Chatbot 2024
• 20 Best Countries To Relocate 2024
• 30 Best Countries For Tourism - Top Tourist Countries
• Canada Work Visa Application Process

Scholarships by Country to Study

• United Kingdom
• United States
• South Africa
• Netherlands
• New Zealand

Scholarships by Category

• Postgraduate
• Undergraduate
• College School
• Entrepreneurs
• Bachelors Degree
• Women Scholarships
• Fully Funded

Scholarships by Country of Origin

• African Students
• Developing Countries

Scholarships by Institution / Company

• Flinders University
• German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD)
• University of Edinburgh
• The World Academy of Sciences (TWAS)

Scholarships by School

• University of Melbourne
• University Of Queensland, Australia
• University of East Anglia
• University of Kent
• Privacy Policy
• Terms of Use

Scholarships

• Undergraduate Scholarships
• Masters Scholarships
• MBA Scholarships
• Ph.D Scholarships
• Fellowship Scholarships
• Fully Funded Scholarships
• F1 Visa Interview Questions And Answers
• Scholarship Application Letter
• Letter Of Intent For Scholarship
• Personal Statement For Masters
• Motivation Letter For Scholarship
• Scholarship Acceptance Letter

Other Locations

• Scholarships in UK
• Scholarships in Canada
• Scholarships for Nigerian Students
• Study Abroad Community

• Undergraduate Students
• Doctoral Students
• Master’s Students
• Engineering Master’s Students
• Faculty & Staff
• Parents & Families
• Asian / Pacific Islander
• Black/African American
• First Generation/Low Income
• Hispanic/Latinx
• International
• Native American/Indigenous
• Neurodiverse
• Student Athletes
• Students with Disabilities
• Undocumented
• What is a Career Community?
• Business, Finance & Consulting
• Data, Technology & Engineering
• Discovery & Exploration
• Education, Government, Nonprofit & Policy
• Energy, Environment & Sustainability
• Entertainment, Media & Arts
• Healthcare & Biomedical Sciences
• Innovation, Entrepreneurship & Design
• Know Yourself
• Explore Options
• Focus & Prepare
• Take Action
• Evaluate & Refine
• Featured Opportunities
• Career Readiness Resources
• Personalize Your Hub
• For Employers

The Institute of World Politics

Summer 2024 american statecraft fellowship.

• Share This: Share Summer 2024 American Statecraft Fellowship on Facebook Share Summer 2024 American Statecraft Fellowship on LinkedIn Share Summer 2024 American Statecraft Fellowship on X

About the Institute of World Politics (IWP)

The Institute of World Politics (IWP) is an independent graduate school devoted to the study of statecraft, national security, and international affairs. It was founded to fill a major national need: to supply professional education in these topics that no other school offered.

About 10 years ago, IWP launched its first undergraduate program, an Internship , which provides young students the opportunity to conduct research with IWP scholar-practitioners and to explore career options in national security and international affairs. Thanks to the overwhelming success and popularity of this program, IWP decided to launch its second undergraduate program, the American Statecraft Fellowship (ASF).

About the American Statecraft Fellowship (ASF)

During the summer of 2024, a small cohort of undergraduate students will be invited to participate in a 10-week seminar that will meet one evening a week. During these weekly seminar meetings at IWP’s campus, American Statecraft Fellows will learn about, and discuss, the how as well as the why of statecraft and strategy with IWP’s own faculty.

Topics will include not only intelligence, counterintelligence, military strategy, political warfare, economic statecraft, diplomacy, and the national security policy process itself, but also the founding principles of America for the sake of which these instruments of national power are integrated into a grand strategy.

Additionally, and equally important, the American Statecraft Fellows will be invited to participate in various aspects of campus life at IWP all summer long. You will not simply be American Statecraft Fellows, in other words, but members of the IWP community.

Thus, the American Statecraft Fellowship will afford its participants the opportunity:

• To learn about IWP’s Distinct Approach to Statecraft.
• To learn from, and speak with, some of IWP’s Core Faculty.
• To become familiar with some of IWP’s Core Courses.
• To interact with, and be mentored by, IWP’s Alumni Network.
• To receive professional advice from IWP’s Career Services .
• To meet, and make friends, with IWP’s Current Graduate Students.

The seminar will run from May 29 to July 31. Each weekly seminar will meet on Wednesday evening, from 7:00-9:00 PM, on IWP’s main campus. Students are encouraged to arrive by no later than 6:30 PM in order to enjoy the dinner that will be provided every week. The topics and their respective faculty can be found below. All course materials will be provided. Information regarding additional programming will be provided in the weeks ahead.

Who Should Apply

Any college or university undergraduate, or recent graduate (December 2023 or May 2024) not already pursuing an advanced degree, may apply to the ASF. Qualified applicants should be students in good academic standing from a regionally accredited institution with a minimum 3.2 GPA, and must have taken introductory courses in history, political science, international affairs, or economics. They should also be able to demonstrate how their interests and goals align with IWP’s Mission.

How to Apply

Applications are being accepted on a rolling basis. The following materials should be sent together via email to Tim McCranor ( [email protected] ). A brief interview may be a part of the application process.

• Internship Application .
• 1 to 2-Page Resume.
• Academic Transcripts (unofficial copy is acceptable).
• One (Academic or Professional) Letter of Recommendation.
• Essay on Professional and Educational Goals (typewritten, 500 words).
• 3 to 5-Page Writing Sample (related to International Affairs, National Security, or Intelligence).

Point of Contact

For questions about the program, or applying, please reach out to IWP’s Academic Program Manager and Adjunct Professor, Tim McCranor ( [email protected] ).

Executive function deficits in genetic frontotemporal dementia: results from the GENFI study

• Find this author on Google Scholar
• Find this author on PubMed
• Search for this author on this site
• For correspondence: [email protected]
• ORCID record for Rhian S Convery
• ORCID record for David M. Cash
• ORCID record for Harro Seelaar
• ORCID record for Robert Laforce
• ORCID record for Caroline Graff
• ORCID record for James B. Rowe
• ORCID record for Matthis Synofzik
• ORCID record for Daniela Galimberti
• ORCID record for Rik Vandenberghe
• ORCID record for Alexander Gerhard
• ORCID record for Isabel Santana
• ORCID record for Florence Pasquier
• ORCID record for Markus Otto
• Info/History
• Supplementary material
• Preview PDF

Background: Executive dysfunction is a core feature of frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Whilst there has been extensive research into such impairments in sporadic FTD, there has been little research in the familial forms. Methods: 752 individuals were recruited in total: 214 C9orf72, 205 GRN and 86 MAPT mutation carriers, stratified into asymptomatic, prodromal and fully symptomatic, and 247 mutation negative controls. Attention and executive function were measured using the Weschler Memory Scale-Revised (WMS-R) Digit Span Backwards (DSB), the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised Digit Symbol task, the Trail Making Test Parts A and B, the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System Color Word Interference Test and verbal fluency tasks (letter and category). Linear regression models with bootstrapping were used to assess differences between groups. Correlation of task score with disease severity was also performed, as well an analysis of the neuroanatomical correlates of each task. Results: Fully symptomatic C9orf72, GRN and MAPT mutation carriers were significantly impaired on all tasks compared with controls (all p<0.001), except on the WMS-R DSB in the MAPT mutation carriers (p=0.147). Whilst asymptomatic and prodromal C9orf72 individuals also demonstrated deficits compared with controls, neither the GRN or MAPT asymptomatic or prodromal mutation carriers showed significant differences. All tasks significantly correlated with disease severity in each of the genetic groups (all p<0.001). Conclusions: Individuals with C9orf72 mutations show difficulties with executive function from very early on in the disease and this continues to deteriorate with disease severity. In contrast, similar difficulties occur only in the later stages of the disease in GRN and MAPT mutation carriers. This differential performance across the genetic groups will be important in neuropsychological task selection in upcoming clinical trials.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

We thank the research participants for their contribution to the study. The Dementia Research Centre is supported by Alzheimer's Research UK, Alzheimer's Society, Brain Research UK, and The Wolfson Foundation. This work was supported by the NIHR UCL/H Biomedical Research Centre, the Leonard Wolfson Experimental Neurology Centre (LWENC) Clinical Research Facility, and the UK Dementia Research Institute, which receives its funding from UK DRI Ltd, funded by the UK Medical Research Council, Alzheimer's Society and Alzheimer's Research UK. JDR is supported by the Miriam Marks Brain Research UK Senior Fellowship and has received funding from an MRC Clinician Scientist Fellowship (MR/M008525/1) and the NIHR Rare Disease Translational Research Collaboration (BRC149/NS/MH). This work was also supported by the MRC UK GENFI grant (MR/M023664/1), the Bluefield Project and the JPND GENFI-PROX grant (2019-02248). Several authors of this publication (JCvS, MS, RSV, AD, MO, RV, JDR) are members of the European Reference Network for Rare Neurological Diseases - Project ID No 739510. MB is supported by a Fellowship award from the Alzheimer's Society, UK (AS-JF-19a-004-517). MB is also supported by the UK Dementia Research Institute which receives its funding from DRI Ltd, funded by the UK Medical Research Council, Alzheimer's Society and Alzheimer's Research UK. RC/CG are supported by a Frontotemporal Dementia Research Studentships in memory of David Blechner funded through The National Brain Appeal (RCN 290173). JBR is supported by the Wellcome Trust (103838), the Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00030/14; MR/T033371/1) and the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR203312). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. The GIF template database includes volumetric MRI scans from the University College London Genetic FTD Initiative (GENFI) study (www.genfi.org.uk) which is funded by the Medical Research Council UK GENFI grant (MR/M023664/1). The GIF template database includes volumetric MRI scans from the University College London Genetic FTD Initiative (GENFI) study (www.genfi.org.uk) which is funded by the Medical Research Council UK GENFI grant (MR/M023664/1).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethics committee/IRB of London Queen Square Research Ethics gave ethical approval for this work

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

View the discussion thread.

Supplementary Material

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Citation Manager Formats

• EndNote (tagged)
• EndNote 8 (xml)
• RefWorks Tagged
• Ref Manager
• Tweet Widget
• Facebook Like
• Google Plus One
• Addiction Medicine (324)
• Allergy and Immunology (628)
• Anesthesia (165)
• Cardiovascular Medicine (2377)
• Dentistry and Oral Medicine (289)
• Dermatology (206)
• Emergency Medicine (379)
• Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (837)
• Epidemiology (11774)
• Forensic Medicine (10)
• Gastroenterology (702)
• Genetic and Genomic Medicine (3742)
• Geriatric Medicine (350)
• Health Economics (634)
• Health Informatics (2399)
• Health Policy (933)
• Health Systems and Quality Improvement (897)
• Hematology (341)
• HIV/AIDS (782)
• Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13316)
• Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (767)
• Medical Education (365)
• Medical Ethics (104)
• Nephrology (398)
• Neurology (3507)
• Nursing (198)
• Nutrition (526)
• Obstetrics and Gynecology (674)
• Occupational and Environmental Health (664)
• Oncology (1824)
• Ophthalmology (537)
• Orthopedics (219)
• Otolaryngology (287)
• Pain Medicine (232)
• Palliative Medicine (66)
• Pathology (446)
• Pediatrics (1034)
• Pharmacology and Therapeutics (426)
• Primary Care Research (420)
• Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3178)
• Public and Global Health (6145)
• Radiology and Imaging (1280)
• Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (747)
• Respiratory Medicine (828)
• Rheumatology (379)
• Sexual and Reproductive Health (372)
• Sports Medicine (323)
• Surgery (402)
• Toxicology (50)
• Transplantation (172)
• Urology (146)