key informant interviews in qualitative research

Key Informant Interviews: An In-Depth Guide for Researchers

Frankline kibuacha | feb. 02, 2024 | 8 min. read.

What are Key Informant Interviews?

Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) are specialized qualitative interviews conducted with individuals (key informants) recognized for their insider knowledge or unique perspectives on a specific topic. This method is distinct in its focus on depth rather than breadth, targeting information-rich sources.

Unlike surveys that seek quantitative data or focus groups that explore group dynamics, KIIs delve deeply into individual perspectives, offering a granular understanding of complex issues.

KIIs are invaluable for gaining insights into trends, motivations, perceptions, and experiences. They are particularly effective in sectors where in-depth, expert knowledge is crucial, such as public health, policy development, and market analysis.

The Importance of Key Informant Interviews in Research

Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) play a pivotal role in qualitative research, offering a depth of understanding often unattainable through other methods. Their significance in various research settings can be elaborated as follows:

• Access to Specialized Knowledge and Expert Insights: KIIs enable researchers to tap into the wealth of knowledge possessed by experts in specific fields. This is especially crucial in areas where specialized insights are vital to understanding complex issues. For instance, interviews with healthcare professionals in public health research can uncover nuances in patient care practices that surveys may not reveal.
• Understanding Context and Nuance: One of the primary strengths of KIIs is their ability to capture the context and nuances around a subject matter. Unlike quantitative methods that offer breadth, KIIs provide depth, uncovering the ‘why’ and ‘how’ behind observable trends. This depth is invaluable in fields like policy analysis, where understanding the rationale behind decisions can inform more effective policy development.
• Flexibility and Adaptability: KIIs offer unmatched flexibility, allowing researchers to explore new lines of inquiry as they emerge during the interview. This adaptability is critical in exploratory research or when dealing with emerging issues, where predefined survey questions might miss important aspects.
• Identifying Hidden or Sensitive Issues: Given their expertise and experience, key informants can provide insights into sensitive or hidden issues that might not be readily disclosed through other methodologies. In contexts such as humanitarian work or conflict research, KIIs can reveal underlying problems or needs that are not visible on the surface.
• Enhancing Other Research Findings: KIIs can complement and improve findings from quantitative research. They add depth to the statistical data by providing qualitative insights, offering a more comprehensive view of the research topic.
• Case Studies Illustrating Impact: Real-world examples further illustrate the impact of KIIs. For example, in environmental research, KIIs with local community leaders and environmental experts have been instrumental in understanding the impact of climate change at a local level, leading to more targeted and effective conservation strategies.

Key Informant Interviews are an indispensable tool in the researcher’s toolkit. They provide a level of detail and understanding crucial for fully grasping complex issues, influencing policy, and informing comprehensive and effective solutions.

Methodology and Best Practices for Key Informant Interviews

Effective Key Informant Interviews require a well-thought-out methodology and adherence to best practices. This section outlines the key steps and considerations for maximizing the value of KIIs.

• Criteria for Selection: The selection of key informants is a critical step. Ideal candidates are those who have in-depth knowledge or experience relevant to the research topic. This could include industry experts, community leaders, or individuals with unique experiences pertinent to the study.
• Diversity and Representation: It’s essential to ensure diversity in selecting informants. This includes diversity in profession, demographic characteristics, and perspectives to obtain a well-rounded understanding of the issue.
• Recruitment Strategies: Effective recruitment may involve formal invitations, leveraging professional networks, or recommendations from other experts in the field. It’s crucial to clearly communicate the purpose of the research and the informant’s role.
• Balancing Structure and Flexibility: While having a structured set of questions to guide the interview is important, flexibility is key. Researchers should be prepared to explore interesting avenues that emerge during the conversation.
• Question Types : A mix of open-ended questions (to explore opinions and experiences) and more specific questions (to gather detailed information) is recommended. Avoid leading questions to minimize bias.
• Piloting Questions: Before conducting the interviews, it’s advisable to pilot the questions with a small group to ensure they are clear and elicit the desired information.
• Building Rapport: The initial part of the interview should focus on building rapport with the informant. This can be achieved through a friendly demeanor, active listening, and genuine interest in the informant’s perspectives.
• Interview Techniques: Effective techniques include probing for details, paraphrasing to check understanding, and managing the pace of the interview. Non-verbal cues play a significant role in creating a comfortable environment.
• Recording and Note-Taking: It’s essential to accurately record the interviews, subject to the informant’s consent. This can be done through audio recordings or detailed note-taking. Clear, concise, and accurate notes are vital for accurate data analysis.
• Informed Consent: Informants should be fully informed about the purpose of the research, how their information will be used, and their rights, including the right to withdraw from the interview at any point.
• Confidentiality and Anonymity: Researchers must respect the confidentiality of the information provided and ensure anonymity if the informant requests it.
• Cultural Sensitivity: It is crucial to be culturally sensitive and respectful of the informant’s background and beliefs, especially when dealing with sensitive topics.
• Debriefing and Reflection: After each interview, a debriefing session can be helpful for the research team to discuss initial impressions and insights.
• Data Management: Organizing and securely storing interview data is crucial for analysis and future reference.

Challenges and Solutions in Key Informant Interviews

Key Informant Interviews, while invaluable in qualitative research, present unique challenges. Addressing these effectively is crucial for the integrity and utility of the data collected.

• Solution: Employing multiple interviewers and informants can provide diverse viewpoints, reducing individual bias. Establishing a clear, structured interview framework helps maintain objectivity. Regular team discussions can also aid in identifying and mitigating biases.
• Solution: Developing a detailed interview guide ensures consistency across interviews. Validity can be enhanced through careful selection of informants based on their expertise and through cross-verification of data with other sources.
• Solution: Flexibility in scheduling and using technology for remote interviews can alleviate logistical issues. Building rapport with informants beforehand can also ease scheduling difficulties. It is also important to have backup interviewees, for instance, someone in the same department with the same knowledge as the primary informant.
• Solution: Employing culturally aware and, where necessary, multilingual interviewers can mitigate these issues. Researching cultural norms and using interpreters when needed is also helpful.
• Solution : KIIs typically involve a small group of respondents, so your best bet is to attain a sample that is well knowledgeable of the topic at hand.
• Solution: Utilizing qualitative data analysis software can streamline coding and thematic analysis, reducing time and subjective biases. Engaging multiple team members in the analysis can provide a balance of perspectives.

While Key Informant Interviews pose specific challenges, these can be effectively addressed through careful planning, methodological rigor, and cultural sensitivity. Overcoming these challenges ensures the integrity and value of the insights gained from this qualitative research method.

Analyzing and Utilizing Data from Key Informant Interviews

Analyzing and utilizing data gathered from KIIs are as crucial as the interview process itself. This phase transforms raw, qualitative data into meaningful insights that can guide decision-making and policy formulation. It is worth noting that, due to their typically small sample sizes and qualitative nature, KIIs are almost never quantified.

• Transcribing Interviews: The first step is to transcribe the interviews verbatim. This process involves converting audio recordings into written text, capturing every word, and noting critical non-verbal cues.
• Data Cleaning: Transcripts should be reviewed and cleaned for clarity and accuracy. This includes removing irrelevant sections, correcting errors, and anonymizing data if required.
• Thematic Analysis: One of the most common approaches is thematic analysis, which involves identifying patterns and themes within the interview data. This process starts with reading through the transcripts multiple times to gain a deep understanding of the content.
• Coding: Coding involves labeling text segments with tags that summarize their content. This could be done manually or with the help of qualitative data analysis software. Initial codes are generated and then refined and grouped into broader themes.
• Interpreting Themes: Once themes are identified, the next step is to interpret them in the context of the research objectives. This involves understanding how these themes contribute to answering the research questions and what new insights they offer.
• Cross-Verification with Other Data Sources: To enhance the validity of the findings, it’s essential to cross-verify the insights from KIIs with other data sources, such as surveys, literature reviews, or observational studies.
• Triangulation: This process involves using multiple data sources or methods to corroborate the findings. Triangulation strengthens the credibility of the research conclusions.
• Developing Recommendations: The insights derived from KIIs should be translated into actionable recommendations. This involves considering how the findings can inform policy, influence strategies, or guide practical interventions.
• Reporting Findings: When reporting findings, it’s essential to present the data in a way that is accessible and understandable to the intended audience. This could include using quotes from informants to illustrate points, creating visual representations of themes, or developing case studies.
• Subjectivity: One of the challenges in analyzing qualitative data is the inherent subjectivity. It’s crucial to approach data interpretation with an awareness of potential biases and strive for objectivity.
• Complexity of Data: Qualitative data from KIIs can be complex and multifaceted. Researchers need to be methodical in their approach to ensure that the richness of the data is fully explored and understood.

In a nutshell, analyzing and utilizing data from Key Informant Interviews require meticulous attention to detail, rigorous methodological approaches, and a careful balance between subjective interpretation and objective analysis.

When to Use Key Informant Interviews in Research

Understanding when to utilize Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) is crucial for researchers to gather in-depth qualitative data effectively. KIIs are particularly advantageous in specific research contexts:

• Exploring Complex or Sensitive Issues: KIIs are ideal when researching topics that are complex, nuanced, or sensitive. They provide a safe environment for informants to share detailed insights and personal experiences that might not be captured through other methods.
• Gaining Expert Perspectives: When a study requires expert opinions or specialized knowledge, KIIs are an excellent choice. They allow researchers to tap into the wealth of experience and expertise of individuals who are well-versed in the subject matter.
• Developing or Refining Hypotheses: In the early stages of research, especially when hypotheses are being developed or refined, KIIs can offer valuable insights that inform the direction and focus of the study.
• Understanding Contextual and Cultural Dynamics: When research involves understanding the cultural or contextual nuances of a topic, KIIs with local experts or community leaders can provide depth and context that other methods may miss.
• Policy Development and Evaluation: For policy-oriented research, KIIs with policymakers, stakeholders, and those affected by the policy can provide insights into both the impact of existing policies and considerations for future policy development.
• Market Research and Consumer Insights: In market research , KIIs with industry experts, consumers, or other stakeholders can uncover trends, motivations, and attitudes that inform marketing strategies and product development.
• When Quantitative Data Needs Qualitative Support: KIIs are also valuable when quantitative data requires qualitative insights for a more comprehensive understanding. They can explain the ‘why’ behind the numbers, adding depth to quantitative findings.
• Resource-Limited Settings: In settings where resources for large-scale surveys are limited, KIIs can provide significant insights without the need for extensive logistics and infrastructure.

The decision to use KIIs should be guided by the research objectives, the nature of the research question, and the context in which the study is conducted. When used appropriately, KIIs can be a powerful tool in the researcher’s arsenal, providing nuanced insights that are vital for in-depth understanding and informed decision-making.

Master Key Informant Interviews with GeoPoll

Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) stand as an indispensable qualitative research tool, adept at uncovering deep insights and nuanced understandings in a wide array of research settings. From exploring complex and sensitive issues to refining hypotheses and informing policy decisions, KIIs offer a unique avenue for accessing expert knowledge and contextual information that other methods might miss.

This guide has journeyed through the intricacies of KIIs, highlighting their importance, methodology, challenges, solutions, and ideal usage scenarios. The careful planning, ethical considerations, and skilled execution required for effective KIIs underscore the need for experienced researchers and methodologists.

GeoPoll, with its vast experience and expertise in conducting KIIs across diverse sectors and regions, is uniquely positioned to help you leverage this powerful research method. Our seasoned professionals are adept at navigating the complexities of KIIs, ensuring that each interview is methodologically sound and rich in valuable insights. We offer a full spectrum of services, from designing the interview guide and selecting key informants to conducting the interviews and analyzing the data.

Contact us for further information on how Key Informant Interviews can enrich your specific research endeavors and how we can support you.

Related Posts

The International Marketing Research Process : A Guide

GeoPoll Report: A Guide To Conducting Research in Emerging Markets

This website may not work correctly because your browser is out of date. Please update your browser .

Key informant interviews

Key informant interviews involve interviewing people who have particularly informed perspectives on an aspect of the program being evaluated.

Key informant interviews are "qualitative, in-depth interviews of 15 to 35 people selected for their first-hand knowledge about a topic of interest. The interviews are loosely structured, relying on a list of issues to be discussed. Key informant interviews resemble a conversation among acquaintances, allowing a free flow of ideas and information. Interviewers frame questions spontaneously, probe for information and take notes, which are elaborated on later" (USAID 1996).

USAID (1996) lists a number of situations in which key informant interviews are useful:

• When decision-making can be achieved through qualitative and descriptive information.
• When it is important to gain an understanding of the perspectives, behaviour and motivations of customers and partners of an activity or project in order to explain the shortcomings and successes of an activity.
• When generating recommendations is the key purpose.
• In order to interpret quantitative data by interviewing key informants about the how and why of the quantitative findings.
• In order to help frame the issues that are relevant before designing a quantitative study.

Advantages to this method include:

They are an affordable way to gain a big picture idea of a situation.

The information gathered comes from people who have relevant knowledge and insight.

They allow for new and unanticipated issues and ideas to emerge.

Limitations to this method include:

There is a potential for the interviewer to unwittingly influence the responses given by informants.

There is a potential bias if informants are not selected with care.

Systematic analysis of a large amount of qualitative data can be time-consuming.

The validity of the data can sometimes be difficult to prove.

Advice for using this method

When formulating study questions, limit the amount to five or fewer.

The interview should allow for free discussion by informants however, interviewers should be aware of what questions to ask and topics that should be covered. 

When preparing a guide for interview topics, items are usually limited to 12 items so as to allow for in-depth discussion. It is sometimes useful to prepare different guides for different groups of informants.

When selecting key informants, it is often a good idea to start with a smaller amount as initially unplanned informants are often added. The total number generally is no more than 35.

In selecting key informants, make sure to include a wide range of perspectives and points of view, including selecting from different groups of key stakeholders.

See Interviews for more general advice on interviewing.

This USAID document advises how to conduct and apply the rapid appraisal technique known as key informant interviews.

Pact, Inc. (2014),  Field Guide for Evaluation: How to Develop an Effective Terms of Reference.  Washington.

USAID Center for Development Information and Evaluation (1996) Conducting Key Informant Interviews   Performance Monitoring & Evaluation TIPS . Washington DC, USAID. Retrieved from  http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNABS541.pdf  via  USAID

'Key informant interviews' is referenced in:

• 52 weeks of BetterEvaluation: Week 4: Including unintended impacts

Framework/Guide

• Communication for Development (C4D) :  C4D Hub: Check the results support causal attribution (strategy 2)
• Communication for Development (C4D) :  C4D Hub: Investigate possible alternative explanations (strategy 3)
• Communication for Development (C4D) :  C4D: Collect and/or retrieve data (methods)
• Communication for Development (C4D) :  C4D: Identify potential unintended results
• Rainbow Framework :  Collect and/ or retrieve data
• Rainbow Framework :  Identify potential unintended results
• Footprint evaluation
• Sustained and Emerging Impacts Evaluation (SEIE)

Back to top

© 2022 BetterEvaluation. All right reserved.

Key Informants’ Interviews

• First Online: 27 October 2022

Cite this chapter

• Salma Akhter 4  

3193 Accesses

4 Citations

This chapter provides a short description of the key informant interview (KII), an important data collection method in qualitative research. Then, the chapter explains the suitability of this method in qualitative research. The chapter discusses the selection process of key informants with the roles of researcher and interviewer. The chapter gives important guidelines of the steps to conduct KII. The chapter also provides some guidelines about the data process, data presentation, and data analysis strategies of KII. The chapter ends with a description of the advantages and disadvantages of KII.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime
• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info
• Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Interviewing in Qualitative Research

Methodological Framework

Qualitative Interviewing

Adams, A., & Cox, A. L. (2008). Questionnaires, in-depth interviews and focus groups. In P. Cairns & A. L. Cox (Eds.), Research methods for human computer interaction (pp. 17–34). Cambridge University Press.

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Ali, M., David, M. K., & Lai, L. C. (2014). Using the Key Informants Interviews (KIIs) technique: A social sciences study with Malaysian and Pakistani respondents. Man and Society , 24 , 131–148

Google Scholar  

Bailey, C. A. (2017). A guide to qualitative field research. The Pine Forge Press series in research methods and statistics . Pine Forge Press. A Sage Publications Company.

Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods , (2nd ed). Oxford university Press.

Douglas, J. (1985). Creating interviewing . Sage.

Henn, M., Weinstein, M., & Foard, N. (2006). A short introduction to social research . Sage Publications: California, USA.

Jones, C. (1993). Qualitative interviewing. In G. Allan, C. Skinner (Eds), Handbook for Research students in the social sciences . The Falmer Press: London.

Kumar, K. (1989). Conducting Key Informant Interviews in Developing Countries, A.I.D. Program Design and Evaluation Methodology Report No. 13, Center for Development Information and Evaluation, A.I.D, December 1989

Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing . Sage Publications.

Lavrakas, Paul J., 2008, Encyclopaedia of Survey research Methods, Sage Publications.

Mack, N., Woodsong, C., Macqueen, K. M., Guest, G., & Namey, E. (2005). Qualitative research methods overview. Qualitative research methods: A data collector’s field guide , 1–12, Family Health International, USAID.

Marshall, M. N. (1996). The key informant technique, Family Practice , 13 (1), Oxford University Press.

Maxwell, J. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach, applied social research methods series . Vol. 41, Sage publication: Thousand Oaks, USA.

McKenna, S. A., & Main, D. S. (2013). The role and influence of key informants in community-engaged research: A critical perspective. Action Research . SAGE.

Needs assessment techniques. Using key informant interviews . Retrieved from. http://ppa.aces.uiuc.edu/pdf_files/Informant1.PDF

Neuman, W., & Lawrence. (1997). Social research methods. Qualitative and quantitative approaches (3rd ed), Allyn and Bacon: USA.

Oklahoma's Official Website. Key informant interview guidance document . Retrieved from. https://www.ok.gov/odmhsas/documents/Key%20Informant%20Interview%20Guidance%20Doc_Draft.pdf

Pact Inc. (2014). Field guide for evaluation: How to develop an effective terms of reference, Washington DC. Retrieved from. https://www.betterevaluation.org/sites/default/files/Field%20Guide%20for%20Evaluation_Final.pdf

Parsons, J., (2008). A Key Informant. Blackwell encyclopaedia of sociology, 2007 , Sage publications.

Punch, KF. (2001). Introduction to social research. Qualitative and quantitative approaches , Sage Publications: London.

Richardson, M. (1994). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 516–529). Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.

Ritchie, J. & Lewis, J. (Eds.). (2013). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers . Sage.

Sanjari, M., Bahramnezhad, F., Fomani, F. K., Shoghi, M., & Cheraghi, M. A. (2014). Ethical challenges of researchers in qualitative studies: The necessity to develop a specific guideline. Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine , 7 , 14.

Sofaer, S. (2002). Qualitative research matters. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 18 (4), 329–336, International Society for Quality in health care and Oxford University Press.

Thakur, D. (2005). Research Methodology in Social Sciences . Deep and Deep Publications Pvt Ltd.

The center for substance abuse prevention’s northeast center for the application of prevention technologies. (2004). Key informant interviews , (NECAPT, 2004 Education Development Center, Inc.

Turney, L. & Pocknee, C. (2005). Virtual Focus Groups. New Frontiers in Research.

UCLA centre for health policy research, Key informant interviews .

University of Illinois Extension Service-Office of Program Planning and Assessment.

USAID centre for Development Information and Evaluation. (1996). Performance monitoring and evaluation TIPS . No. 2. Retrieved from. http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNABS541.pdf

Washington University. Conducting key informant interviews guide. Key informant interview handbook . courses.washington.edu.

World Health organization (WHO). (2003). Description of the key informant survey . Retrieved from. http://www.who.int/evidence/KI-Survey

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Sociology, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, 1000, Bangladesh

Salma Akhter

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salma Akhter .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Centre for Family and Child Studies, Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates

M. Rezaul Islam

Department of Development Studies, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh

Niaz Ahmed Khan

Department of Social Work, School of Humanities, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa

Rajendra Baikady

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Akhter, S. (2022). Key Informants’ Interviews. In: Islam, M.R., Khan, N.A., Baikady, R. (eds) Principles of Social Research Methodology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5441-2_27

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5441-2_27

Published : 27 October 2022

Publisher Name : Springer, Singapore

Print ISBN : 978-981-19-5219-7

Online ISBN : 978-981-19-5441-2

eBook Packages : Social Sciences Social Sciences (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research