critical discourse analysis phd germany

• Skip to navigation (Press Enter).
• Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Faculty of Social Sciences

• Doctoral Studies
• International Relations
• Research & Postgraduates
• Research & Postgraduates
• AG Discourse Analysis

Da die Arbeitssprache der DocAG Englisch ist, ist auch die folgende Beschreibung auf Englisch verfasst:

General goals

The Discourse Analysis Doc-AG, as implied by its name, is focused on the methodology of discourse analysis. Discussions at meeting will either focus on the method in general, or on the research of members, according to their needs.

The working group is aimed at offering members a gradual and reciprocal introduction to discourse analysis, through systematic exploration of the basic as well as advanced developments of the techniques and theoretical background related to this methodology. The working group will begin with reviewing classical and canonical texts of discourse analysis (such as Saussure, Bakhatin, Foucault, Barthes), and will later produce a list which could serve as an initial bibliography of the methodology. In discussion and investigation of various principles of inquiry of discourse analysis, members will debate the advantages and disadvantages of the methods for diverse purposes and goals, and the different course of development of the methodology in different countries and traditions of research.

Furthermore, the working group will offer members the opportunity to present their own work and challenges they face while applying the methodology in their research. It is hoped that the theoretical and methodological basis that will be developed through the meetings of the group will help members in their application of the method, and that the possibility of receiving assistance and support from other members will be both useful and fruitful.

Working Method

The group will meet once a month (mostly via Skype), and will place 1-2 papers for discussion at each meeting.

Reading materials will be distributed before each meeting (at least one week in advance), to ensure proper and fruitful participation.

Later on, the working group will also invite outside experts on the methodology for seminars, and introduction workshops to relevant software tools are also envisioned (e.g. Lexico 3).

Members and working title of  the dissertation

Marija grujic.

Working title of the dissertation: Serbian Nationalism and Internally Displaced Persons from Kosovo – the intersection of religious, national and gender identities

Aviv Melamud

Working title of the dissertation: Negotiating compliance in the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty regime: the evolution and role of justice perceptions in treaty interpretation

Kristina Nottbohm

Working title of the dissertation: Feminism and Multiculturalism. Debates About an Influential Contradiction. A Comparison Between Germany and France.

Beatriz Junqueira Lage Carbone

Working title of the dissertation: Continuities and Discontinuities in the Bolsa Família Program Public Debate: Analyzing Poverty and Prejudice in Brazil.

Luis Manuel Hernández Aguilar

Working title of the dissertation: Becoming German Muslim-Muslim German. On racism, hyphen’s politics and the German Islam Conference.

Aviv Melamud ( [email protected] )

Marija Grujic ( [email protected] )

Why Discourse Matters? 2 nd Graduate Conference on Theoretical and Methodological Practices of Discourse Approaches

October 17-18, 2014  Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.

The conference will focus on the theoretical and methodological implications of employing discourse analysis in interdisciplinary social science research. We are interested in discourse analysis tools of inquiries and their intersection with other techniques of qualitative research such as biographical, narrative analysis, ethnography, or case studies. We also call for contributions that examine the traveling nature and deployment of discourses in international arenas, as well as the inherent changing structure of discourses, emphasizing its mutations and flow in a synchronic and diachronic way.

Keynote speaker: Prof. Ruth Wodak.

 ** Click here ** for more information on the conference, description of panels, and application forms.

  1 st Conference: Why Discourse Matters? Theoretical and Methodological Practices of Discourse Analysis, April 25-26, 2014 Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany: Program / concluding report

• AG Creative Writing
• AG Democracy
• AG Ethics and (self-)reflexivity in qualitative research
• © 2004-2024 Goethe University Frankfurt/Main
• Privacy Policy
• Cookie Settings
• Studying at Goethe University
• International applicants
• Overview of study programmes
• Programme for refugees
• Goethe Business School (continuing education)
• Research at Goethe University
• Scientific news
• Goethe Welcome Center (for international researchers)
• Collaborative research projects
• Individual research
• Visiting fellowships
• Endowed chairs
• About the University
• News-in-brief
• University administration
• Campus locations
• Campus life
• University archives (German)
• Rhine-Main-Universities
• Campuservice (host your event on campus)
• Jobs at Goethe University
• Job board for companies
• University Library
• Student Life
• Life in Frankfurt
• University Sport Centre
• Job Boards (German)
• Cafeteria menus
• Studentenwerk student services

Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society pp 71–135 Cite as

Critical Discourse Analysis: Definition, Approaches, Relation to Pragmatics, Critique, and Trends

• Linda R. Waugh 3 ,
• Theresa Catalano 4 ,
• Khaled Al Masaeed 5 ,
• Tom Hong Do 6 &
• Paul G. Renigar 7  
• First Online: 01 January 2015

9185 Accesses

16 Citations

Part of the book series: Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology ((PEPRPHPS,volume 4))

This chapter introduces the transdisciplinary research movement of critical discourse analysis (CDA) beginning with its definition and recent examples of CDA work. In addition, approaches to CDA such as the dialectical relational (Fairclough), socio-cognitive (van Dijk), discourse historical (Wodak), social actors (van Leeuwen), and Foucauldian dispositive analysis (Jӓger and Maier) are outlined, as well as the complex relation of CDA to pragmatics. Next, the chapter provides a brief mention of the extensive critique of CDA, the creation of critical discourse studies (CDS), and new trends in CDA, including positive discourse analysis (PDA), CDA with multimodality, CDA and cognitive linguistics, critical applied linguistics, and other areas (rhetoric, education, anthropology/ethnography, sociolinguistics, culture, feminism/gender, and corpus studies). It ends with new directions aiming towards social action for social justice.

• Critical discourse analysis
• Critical discourse studies
• Critical approaches
• (Socio)pragmatics

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution .

Buying options

• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info
• Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

The authors would like to thank the following for their comments on an earlier draft of this chapter: Alessandro Capone, Jacob Mey, Neal Norrick, and Teun van Dijk. We also owe a debt of gratitude to the three graduate assistants who helped with the references: Ji Guo and Qizhen Deng who worked with Theresa Catalano, and most especially, Steve Daniel Przymus who has a keen eye for detail and worked tirelessly, even while he was on vacation, with Linda Waugh.

In much of his work, Fairclough has insisted upon his “text orientation,” that is, a focus on particular authentic texts.

The issue of whether a family name beginning with “van” should be written with a lower case “v” or an upper case “V” is a difficult one. Van Dijk uses V on his website; however, in many citations of his work, “v” is used, and his name is alphabetized under “v.” We will use the latter spelling (unless Van is the first word in a sentence) and alphabetization; the same is true of other names, such as van Leeuwen.

We will use CDA in our discussion, even though van Dijk prefers ‘critical discourse studies’, since he feels that the latter is, for him, a more general term than CDA, covering critical analysis, critical theory, and critical applications . It also aligns with the term ‘discourse studies’, rather than ‘discourse analysis’, since he views discourse studies as a multidisciplinary field that is not limited to analysis or to any particular type or method of analysis. Indeed, for him “CDS is not a method, but rather a critical perspective, position or attitude ” (van Dijk 2009b , p. 62).

See the discussion of S. Jӓger’s work in Dispositive Analysis below.

In their introduction to the volume Foundations of Pragmatics, the first one in the new series, Handbooks of Pragmatics, published by Mouton de Gruyter.

Note that the journal Critical Discourse Studies and its acronym CDS are in italics in the text, while the trend in Critical Discourse Studies (CDS) is denoted in regular font.

Achugar, M. 2007. Between remembering and forgetting: Uruguayan military discourse about human rights (1976–2004). Discourse and Society 18:521–547.

Google Scholar  

Achugar, M. 2008. What we remember: The construction of memory in military discourse . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Adami, E., and G. Kress. 2013. Using multimodal analysis in investigating digital texts: The case of a food blog. Presentation given at the 2013 Conference of the International Communication Association, London, UK, 17–21 June 2013.

Adorno, A. 1969. Der Positivismusstreit in der deutschen Soziologie . Berlin: Luchterhand.

Ahmadvand, M. 2011. Critical discourse analysis: An introduction to major approaches. Dinamika Bahasa dan Ilmu Budaya [ Indonesian Journal of Linguistic and Cultural Studies ] 5 (1): 82–90.

Althusser, L. 1971. Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (Notes towards an investigation). In Lenin and philosophy and other essays , ed. L. Althusser, 127–186. New York: Monthly Review Press.

Andersen, A. A. 2003. Discursive analytical tools: Understanding Foucault, Koselleck, Laclau, Luhmann . Bristol: Policy.

Anderson, K. T., and P. Wales. 2012. Can you design for agency? The ideological mediation of an out-of-school digital storytelling workshop. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies 9 (3): 165–190.

Anthonissen, C., and J. Blommaert. 2007. Discourse and human rights violations . Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Austin, J. 1962. How to do things with words . London: Oxford University Press.

Baker, P. 2006. Corpora in discourse analysis . London: Continuum.

Baker, P., and T. McEnery. 2005. A corpus-based approach to discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in UN and newspaper texts. Journal of Language and Politics 4 (2): 197–226.

Baker, P., C. Gabrielatos, M. Khosravinik, M. Krzyzanowski, T. McEnery, and R. Wodak. 2008. A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society 19 (3): 273–306.

Bakhtin, M. 1984. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics . Trans: C. Emerson Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Barkho, L. 2011. The role of internal guidelines in shaping news narratives: Ethnographic insights into the discursive rhetoric of Middle East reporting by the BBC and Al-Jazeera English. Critical Discourse Studies 8 (4): 297–309.

Bar-Tal, D. 2000. Shared beliefs in a society: Social psychological analysis . Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Barthes, R. 1967. Système de la mode . Paris: Seuil.

Barthes, R. 1967/1983. Section I (Chapters 1–4): Method. The Fashion system . Trans: M. Ward and R. Howard. New York: Hill.

Barthes, R. 1972. Mythologies . Trans: A. Lavers. St. Albans: Paladin [French original: 1957].

Barthes, R. 1974. Mythen des Alltags . Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp (Trans:1957, Mythologies . Paris: Editions du Seuil).

Barthes, R. 1984. Camera lucida . London: Fontana.

Bartlett, T. 2012. Hybrid voices and collaborative change: Contextualising positive discourse analysis . New York: Routledge.

Bauer, M., and B. Aarts. 2000. Corpus construction: A principle for qualitative data collection. In Qualitative researching with text, image and sound, ed. M. Bauer and G. Gaskell, 19–37. London: Sage.

Belluigi, D. Z. 2009. Exploring the discourses around “creativity” and “critical thinking” in a South African creative arts curriculum. Studies in Higher Education 34 (6): 699–717.

Benwell, B. 2005. “Lucky this is anonymous!” Men’s magazines and ethnographies of reading: A textual cultural approach. Discourse & Society 16 (2): 147–172.

Berger, P.L., and T. Luckmann. 1967. The social construction of reality . Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Berlin, J. 1988. Rhetoric and ideology in the writing class. College English 50 (5): 477–494.

Bernstein, B. 1962. Social class, linguistic codes and grammatical elements. Language and Speech 5 (4): 221–240.

Bernstein, B. 1971. Class, codes and control 1: Theoretical studies towards a sociology of language . London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Bernstein, B., ed. 1973. Class, codes and control 2: Applied studies towards a sociology of language . London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Bernstein, B. 1975. Class, codes and control 3: Towards a theory of educational transmissions . London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Bhatia, A., and V. K. Bhatia. 2011. Discursive illusions in legislative discourse: A socio-pragmatic study. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 24:1–19.

Billig, M. 2002. Critical discourse analysis and the rhetoric of critique. In Critical discourse analysis: Theory and interdisciplinarity, ed. G. Weiss and R. Wodak, 35–46. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Billig, M. 2008. The language of critical discourse analysis: The case of nominalization. Discourse & Society 19 (6): 783–800.

Biria, R., and A. Mohammadi. 2012. The socio pragmatic functions of inaugural speech: A critical discourse analysis approach. Journal of Pragmatics 44:1290–1302.

Blackledge, A. 2011. Discourse and power. In The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis, ed. J. Gee and M. Handford. London: Routledge.

Blommaert, J. 2001. Critique is/as critique. Critique of Anthropology 2 (1): 3–32.

Blommaert, J. 2005. Discourse: A critical introduction . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Blommaert, J. 2009. Ethnography and democracy: Hymes’s political theory of language. Text & Talk 29 (3): 257–276.

Bloomaert, J., and C. Bulcaen. 2000. Critical discourse analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology 29:447–466.

Bloor, M., and T. Bloor. 2007. The practice of critical discourse analysis: An introduction . London: Hodder Arnold.

Blum-Kulka, S., and M. Hamo. 2011. Discourse pragmatics. In Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction , ed. T. A. van Dijk, 2nd ed., 143–164. London: Sage.

Bogatyrev, P. 1971. The function of folk costume in Moravian Slovakia . The Hague: Mouton.

Bourdieu, P. 1987. Die Kritik der feinen Unterschiede . Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp (Trans: of 1979, La Distinction: Critique sociale du jugement . Paris: Les Editions de Minuit).

Boxer, D. 2002. Applying sociolinguistics . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Breeze, R. 2011. Critical discourse analysis and its critics. Pragmatics 21 (4): 493–525.

Brown, R., and A. Gilman. 1960. The pronouns of power and solildarity. In Style in language, ed. T. A. Sebeok, 253–276. Harmondsworth: Penguin (Reprinted in P. Giglioli (Ed.), 1972, Language and social context , 252–282).

Brown, P., and S. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brown, R., and G. Yule. 1983. Discourse analysis . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brumfit, C. 1997. How applied linguistics is the same as any other science. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 7 (1): 86–94.

Bublitz, W., and J. Norrick. 2011. Introduction: The burgeoning field of pragmatics. In Foundations of pragmatics . Vol. 1, ed. W. Bublitz and N. Norrick, . Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

Bucholtz, M. 2003. Theories of discourse as theories of gender: Discourse analysis in language and gender studies. In The handbook of language and gender, ed. J. Holmes and M. Meyerhoff, 43–68. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Bussolini, J. 2010. What is a dispositive? Foucault Studies 10:85–107.

Caborn, J. 2007. On the methodology of dispositive analysis. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines 1 (1): 115–123. http://cadaad.net/journal .

Callow, J. 2006. Images, politics and multiliteracies: Using a visual metalanguage. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 29 (1): 7–23.

Cameron, D. 1990. Introduction. In Women in their speech communities: New perspectives on language and sex, ed. J. Coates and D. Cameron, 3–12. London: Longman.

Cameron, D. 1992. Feminism and linguistic theory . 2nd ed. London: Macmillan.

Cameron, D. 1997. Theoretical debates in feminist linguistics: Questions of sex and gender. In Gender and discourse, ed. R. Wodak, 21–36. London: Sage.

Cameron, D. 1998. Gender, language and discourse: A review essay. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 23 (4): 945–973.

Cameron, D., and J. Coates. 1990. Some problems in the sociolinguistic explanations of sex differences. In Women in their speech communities: New perspectives on language and sex, ed. J. Coates and D. Cameron, 13–26. London: Longman.

Candlin, C. N. 1989. General editor’s preface. In Language and Power . 1st ed., ed. N. Fairclough, vi–x. London: Longman.

Carbaugh, D. 1988. Talking American: Cultural discourses on Donahue . Norwood: Ablex.

Carbaugh, D. 2005. Cultures in conversation . Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Carbaugh, D. 2007. Cultural discourse analysis: Communication practices and intercultural encounters. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research 36 (3): 167–182.

Carbaugh, D. 2010a. Distinctive qualities in communication research . New York: Routledge.

Carbaugh, D. 2010b. Resituating cultural studies in communication: Cultural discourse analyis. In Hybrids, differences, visions: On the study of culture, ed. C. Baraldi, A. Borsari, and A. Carli, 101–116. Aurora: John Davies.

Carpenter, R. H. 1994. The stylistic persona of Bill Clinton. From Arkansas to Aristotelian Attica. In Bill Clinton on stump, state, and stage, ed. S. Smith, 101–132. Fayetteville: The University of Arkansas Press.

Catalano, T. 2012. The denaturalization of Romanies in Italy: How language and image work together. The International Journal of the Image 2 (4): 159–172.

Catalano, T. 2014. The Roma and Wall Street/CEOs: Linguistic construction of identity in U.S. and Canadian crime reports. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 38 (2) . http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2013.803768 .

Catalano, T., and A. Moeller. 2013. Media discourse and dual language programs: A critical linguistic analysis. Discourse, Context & Media 2 (4): 165–174.

Catalano, T., and L. R. Waugh. 2013a. The language of money: How verbal and visual metonymy shapes public opinion about financial events. International Journal of Language Studies 7 (2): 31–60.

Catalano, T., and L. Waugh. 2013b. A critical analysis of metonymy in image and text: The ideologies behind crime reports of Latinos and Wall Street/CEOs. Critical Discourse Studies 10 (4): 406–426.

Cazden, C. 2001. Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning . 2nd ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press [1st ed: 1988].

Charteris-Black, J. 2004. Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Charteris-Black, J. 2006. Britain as a container: Immigration metaphors in the 2005 election campaign. Discourse & Society 17 (6): 563–582.

Charteris-Black, J. 2011. Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor . 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Charteris-Black, J. 2014. Analysing political speeches: Rhetoric, discourse and metaphor . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Cheshire, J., and P., Trudgill, eds. 1998. The sociolinguistics reader: Vol. 2, gender and discourse . London: Arnold.

Chilton, P. 1994a. La plaie qu’il convient de fermer: Les métaphores du discours raciste. Journal of Pragmatics 21 (6): 583–619.

Chilton, P., ed. 1994b. Schémas cognitifs du discourse raciste français . Vol. 4. Rotterdam: Institute for Social Policy Research.

Chilton, P. 1996a. The meaning of security . East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.

Chilton, P. 1996b. Security metaphors: Cold war discourse from containment to common European home . Bern: Peter Lang.

Chilton, P. 2004. Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice . London: Routledge.

Chilton, P. 2005a. Missing links in mainstream CDA: Modules, blends and the critical instinct. In A new agenda in (critical) discourse analysis: Theory, methodology and interdisciplinary, ed. R. Wodak and P. Chilton, 19–51. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Chilton, P. 2005b. Manipulation, Memes and metaphors: The case of Mein Kampf '. In Manipulation, ed. L. de Saussure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Chilton, P. 2007. Is it possible to compare political rhetoric across cultures? International round table on discourse . Hong Kong: City University.

Chilton, P. 2010. The language–ethics interface: Reflection on linguistics, discourse analysis and the legacy of Habermas. In Discourse-politics-identity, eds R. de Cillia, H. Gruber, M. Krzyzanowski, and F. Menz, 33–43. Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.

Chilton, P. 2014. January 4. Professor Paul Chilton, Department of Linguistics and English Language. http://www.ling.lancs.ac.uk/profiles/paul-chilton . Accessed 4 Jan 2014.

Chilton, P. forthcoming. Language and critique: Rethinking critical discourse analysis . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chilton, P., and C., Aubrey, eds. 1983. Nineteen eighty-four in 1984: Autonomy, control and communication . London: Comedia.

Chilton, P., and G. Lakoff. 1995. Foreign policy by metaphor. In Language and peace , ed. C. Schäffner and A. I. Wenden, 37–60. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Chilton, P., and R. Wodak, eds. 2007. A new research agenda in (critical) discourse analysis: Theory and interdisciplinarity . Amsterdam: Benjamins (Revised 2nd ed.).

Chouliaraki, L., and N. Fairclough. 1999. Discourse in late modernity : Rethinking critical discourse analysis . Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Christie, C. 2000. Gender and language: Towards a feminist pragmatics . Edingburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Cienki, A. 1998. Metaphoric gestures and some of their relations to verbal metaphoric expressions. In ed. J. -P. Koenig, 189–204. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.

Cienki, A. 2008. Why study metaphor and gesture? In Metaphor and gesture, ed. A. Cienki and C. Müller, 5–25. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Cienki, A., and C. Müller, eds. 2008a. Metaphor and gesture . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Cienki, A., and C. Müller. 2008b. Metaphor, gesture and thought. In The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought, ed. R. Gibbs, 462–501. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cienki, A. 2009. When speech and gesture come together: Forms of multimodal metaphor in the use of spoken language. In Multimodal metaphor, ed. C. Forceville and E. Urios-Aparisi, 297–328. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Clarke, I., W. Kwon, and R. Wodak. 2012. A context-sensitive approach to analyzing talk in strategy meetings. British Journal of Management 23:455–473. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00759.

Clary-Lemmon, J. 2009. The rhetoric of race and the racialization of composition studies. College Composition and Communication 61 (2): 1–17.

Coates, J. 1993. Women, men and language . London: Longman.

Coates, J. 1997. Women’s friendships, women’s talk. In Gender and discourse, ed. R. Wodak, 245–262. London: Sage.

Collins, J. 2011. Foreword: Introduction to critical discourse analysis in education. In An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education . 2nd ed., ed. R. Rogers, ix–xiii. New York: Routledge.

Connerton, J., ed. 1976. Critical sociology: selected readings . Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Cook, G. 1992. The discourse of advertising . London: Routledge.

Cope, B., and M. Kalantzis, eds. 2000. Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures . London: Routledge.

Coulthard, M., and M. Montgomery, eds. 1981. Studies in discourse analysis . London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Courtine, J. -J. 1981. Analyse du discours politique (le discours communiste adressé aux chrétiens). Langages 62 (whole volume).

Da Silva, D. E. G. 2012. Social representations and experiential metafunction: Poverty and media discourse. In Proceedings of ISFC 35: Voices around the world, ed. C. Wu, C. Matthiessen, and M. Herke. Sydney: The 35th ISFC Organizing Committee.

Davis, H., and P. Walton, eds. 1983. Language, image, media . Oxford: Blackwell.

De Cillia, R., M. Reisigl, and R. Wodak. 1999. The discursive construction of national identities. Discourse & Society 10 (2): 149–173.

Deckert, S., and C. Vickers. 2011. An introduction to sociolinguistics: Society and identity . New York: Continuum.

Djonov, E., and S. Zhao. 2014. Critical multimodal studies of popular discourse . London: Routledge.

Downes, W. 1998. Language and society . 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Duranti, A. 1997. Linguistic anthropology . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Duranti, A., and C. Goodwin. 1992. Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Eisenhart, C. 2008. Reporting Waco: The constitutive work of bureaucratic style. In Rhetoric in detail: Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture, ed. B. Johnstone and C. Eisenhart, 57–80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

El Refaie, E. 2001. Metaphors we discriminate by: Naturalized themes in Austrian newspaper articles about asylum seekers. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5 (3): 352–371.

Engels, F. 1895. Letter to Conrad Schmidt. In Reader in Marxist philosophy, ed. H. Selsam and H. Martel, 176–179. New York: International (1963).

Engels, F. 1976. Anti-Dühring . Peking: Foreign Languages Press [Orig. date of pub.:1877–1878].

Ennis-McMillan, M. 2001. Suffering from water shortage: Social origins of bodily distress in a Mexican community. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 15 (3): 368–390.

Erckenbrecht, U. 1973. Marx’ Materialistische Sprachtheorie . Kronberg: Scriptor Verlag.

Every, D. 2013. Shame on you: The language, practice and consequences of shame and shaming in asylum seeker advocacy. Discourse & Society 24 (6): 667–686.

Fairclough, N. 1985. Critical and descriptive goals in discourse analysis. Journal of Pragmatics 9:739–763.

Fairclough, N. 1988. Discourse representation in media discourse. Sociolinguistics 17:125–139.

Fairclough, N. 1989. Language and power . London: Longman.

Fairclough, N., ed. 1992a. Critical language awareness . London: Longman.

Fairclough, N. 1992b. Discourse and social change . Cambridge: Polity.

Fairclough, N. 1992c Discourse and text: Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. Discourse & Society 3 (2): 193–217.

Fairclough, N. 1992d. Critical discourse analysis in practice: Description. Language and Power . 2nd ed., 91–116. London: Longman.

Fairclough, N. 1995a. Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language . London: Longman.

Fairclough, N. 1995b. General introduction. Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language . 1st ed., 1–20. London: Longman.

Fairclough, N. 1995c. Media discourse . London: Edward Arnold.

Fairclough, N. 1998. Political discourse in the media: An analytical framework. Approaches to media discourse , 142–162. Oxford: Blackwell.

Fairclough, N. 1999. Global capitalism and critical awareness of language. Language Awareness 8 (2): 71–83.

Fairclough, N. 2000. New labour, new language? London: Routledge.

Fairclough, N. 2001a. Introduction: critical language study. In Language and power . 2nd ed, ed. N. Fairclough. Edinburgh: Pearson Education.

Fairclough, N. 2001b. Critical discourse analysis. In How to Analyze Talk in Institutional Settings: A Casebook of Methods, ed. A. McHoul and M. Rapley. London: Continuum.

Fairclough, N. 2003. Analyzing discourse: Textual analysis for social research . London: Routledge.

Fairclough, N. 2006. Language and globalization . London: Routledge.

Fairclough, N. 2009. A dialectical-relational approach. In Methods of critical discourse analysis, ed. R. Wodak and M. Meyer, 162–186. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Fairclough, N. 2010a. Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language . 2nd ed. Harlow: Longman.

Fairclough, N. 2010b. General introduction. In Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language . 2nd ed., 1–21. Harlow: Longman.

Fairclough, N. 2010c. Introduction. To section C, dialectics of discourse: Theoretical developments. In Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language . 2nd ed., 163–166. Harlow: Longman.

Fairclough, N. 2011. Semiotic aspects of social transformation and learning. In An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education . 2nd ed., ed. R. Rogers, 119–127. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Fairclough, N. 2012. Critical discourse analysis. International Advances in Engineering and Technology 7:452–487.

Fairclough, I., and N. Fairclough. 2012. Political discourse analysis: A method for advanced students . London: Routledge.

Fairclough, N., and R. Wodak. 1997. Chapter 10: Critical discourse analysis. In Discourse as social interaction, ed. T. A. van Dijk, 258–284. London: Sage.

Fairclough, N., P. Graham, J. Lemke, and R. Wodak. 2004a. Introduction. Critical Discourse Studies 1 (1): 1–7.

Fairclough, N., B. Jessop, and A. Sayer. 2004b. Critical realism and semiosis. In Realism, discourse and deconstruction, ed. J. Joseph and J. Roberts, 23–42. London: Routledge (Reprinted in Fairclough. N. 2010a. Critical discourse analysis. pp. 202–222. Page numbers in the text are to this reprinted version).

Fairclough, N., J. Mulderrig, and R. Wodak. 2011. Critical discourse analysis. In Discourse studies, ed. T. A. van Dijk, 357–378. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Fauconnier, G. 1994. Mental spaces. Aspects of meaning construction in natural language . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fauconnier, G. 1997. Mappings in thought and language . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fauconnier, G. 1999. Methods and generalizations. In Cognitive linguistics: Foundations, scope and methodology, ed. T. Janssen and T. Redeker, 95–128. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Fauconnier, G., and M. Turner. 1996. Blending as a central process of grammar. In Conceptual structure, discourse and language, ed. A. E. Goldberg, 113–130. Stanford: CSLI.

Fauconnier, G., and Turner, M. 2002. The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities . New York: Basic Books.

Fillmore, C. 1982. Frame semantics. In Linguistics in the morning calm, ed. Linguistics Society of Korea, 111–137. Seoul: Hanshin.

Finger, U. D. 1976. Sprachzerstörung im Gruppen . Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

Flader, D., and R. Wodak-Leodolter. 1979. Therapeutische Kommunikation . Königstein/Ts: Skriptor.

Foluke, U. 2011. Event models: A socio-cognitive study of selected interrogations in 2008 quasi-judicial public hearing on Federal Capital Territory (FCT) administration in Nigeria. Studies in Literature and Language 3 (1): 37–44. doi:10.3968/j.sll.1923156320110301.300.

Forceville, C. 1996. Pictorial metaphor in advertising . London: Routledge.

Forceville, C. 2005. Cognitive linguistics and multimodal metaphor. In Bildwissenschaft: Zwischen Reflektion und Anwendung, ed. K. Sachs-Hornbach, 264–284. Cologne: Von Halem.

Forceville, C. 2007. Pictorial and multimodal metaphor in commercials. In Go figure! New directions in advertising rhetoric, ed. E. McQuarrie and B. Phillips, 272–310. Armonk: ME Sharpe.

Forceville, C. 2008. Metaphor in pictures and multimodal representations. In The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought , ed. R. Gibbs, 462–482. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Forceville, C. 2014. The strategic use of the visual mode in advertising metaphors. In Critical multimodal studies of popular discourse, ed. E. Djonov and S. Zhao, 55–70. London: Routledge.

Forceville, C., and E. Urios-Aparis, eds. 2009. Multimodal metaphor . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Forchtner, B., M. Krzyzanowski, and R. Wodak. 2013. Mediatization, right-wing populism, and political campaigning: The case of the Austrian Freedom Party. In Media talk and political elections in Europe and America, ed. A. Tolson and M. Ekström, 205–228. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Forgas, J., ed. 1981. Social cognition: Perspectives on everyday understanding . London: Academic.

Foucault, M. 1971. L’ordre du discours . Paris: Gallimard.

Foucault, M. 1972. Orders of discourse. Social Science Information 10 (2): 7–30.

Foucault, M. 1977a. The archaeology of knowledge Trans: A. Sheridan Smith. New York: Random House.

Foucault, M. 1977b. Language, counter-memory, practice, ed. D. Bouchard and S. Simon. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Foucault, M. 1978. The history of sexuality . Vol. 1. New York: Random House.

Foucault, M. 1979. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison . Harmondsworth: Penguin Books (Trans: A. Sheridan [French original: 1975]).

Foucault, M. 1980. Power/knowledge — Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977 . Brighton: Harvester.

Foucault, M. 1984. The order of discourse. In Language and politics, ed. M. Shapiro, 108–138. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Foucault, M. 1993. Die Ordnung des Diskurses . 2nd ed. Frankfurt a. M.: Fischer (Trans: W. Seitter [French original: 1971, L’ordre du discours ]).

Foucault, M. 2002. The archaeology of knowledge . London: Routledge (1st English ed., 1972).

Fowler, R. 1986. Linguistic criticism (1st ed., 1986, in preparation since 1981; 2nd ed., 1996b).

Fowler, R. 1987. Notes on critical linguistics. In Language topics: Essays in honour of Michael Halliday . 2 vols., eds. T. Threadgold and R. Steele. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Fowler, R. 1991. Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press . London: Routledge.

Fowler, R. 1996. On critical linguistics. In Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis , ed. C. R. Caldas-Coulthard and M. Coulthard, 3–14. London: Routledge.

Fowler, R. 1979. Critical Linguistics. ed. R. Fowler et al. (pp. 185–213 and 220–222 endnotes). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Fowler, R., B. Hodge, G. Kress, and T. Trew. 1979. Language and control . London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Freitas, E., and B. Zolkower. 2009. Using social semiotics to prepare mathematics teachers to teach for social justice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 12 (3): 187–203.

Galasinski, D. 2011. The patient’s world: Discourse analysis and ethnography. Critical Discourse Studies 8 (4): 253–265.

Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in ethnomethodology . Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

Gavriely-Nuri, D. 2010a. If both opponents “extend hands in peace” Why don’t they meet? Mythic metaphors and cultural codes in the Israeli peace discourse. Journal of Language and Politics 9 (3): 449–468.

Gavriely-Nuri, D. 2010b. The idiosyncratic language of Israeli ‘peace’: A cultural approach to Critical Discourse Analysis (CCDA). Discourse & Society 21:565–585.

Gavriely-Nuri, D. 2012. Cultural approach to CDA. Critical Discourse Studies 9 (1): 77–85.

Gavriely-Nuri, D. 2013. The normalization of war in Israeli discourse 1967–2008 . Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Education (Lexington Books).

Gavriely-Nuri, D. 2014. Collective memory as a metaphor: The case of speeches by Israeli prime ministers 2001–2009. Memory Studies 7 (1): 46–60.

Gee, J. P. 2011. Discourse analysis: what makes it critical? In An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education . 2nd ed., ed. R. Rogers, 23–45. New York: Routledge. Gibbons, A. 2011. Multimodality, cognition and experimental literature. London: Routledge.

Giglioli, P. P., ed. 1972. Language and social context . Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Girnth, H. 1996. Texte im politischen Diskurs. Ein Vorschlag zur diskursorientierten Beschreibung von Textsorten. Muttersprache 106 (1): 66–80.

Gleason, H. 1973. Contrastive analysis in discourse structure. In Readings in Stratificational Linguistics , eds. A. Makkai and D. Lockwood. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.

Goatly, A. 2007. Washing the brain: Metaphor and hidden ideology . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Goffman, E. 1981. Forms of talk. Oxford: Blackwell.

Graham, L. J. 2007. Schooling attention deficit hyperactivity disorders: Educational systems of formation and the ‘behaviourally disordered’ school child. Unpublished PhD thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane.

Graham, L. J. 2009. The cost of opportunity. Paper presented at the Philosophy in Education Society of Australasia (PESA) Annual Conference, December 3–6. University of Hawaii, Honolulu.

Graham, L. J. 2011. The product of text and ‘other’ statements: Discourse analysis and the critical use of Foucault. Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (6): 663–674.

Graham, L. J., and R. Slee. 2008. An illusory interiority: Interrogating the discourse/s of inclusion. Educational Philosophy and Theory 40 (2): 247–260.

Graham, P. W., T. Keenan, and A. Dowd. 2004. A call to arms at the end of history: A discourse-historical analysis of George W. Bush’s declaration of war on terror. Discourse & Society 15 (2–3): 199–221.

Grice, H. P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Syntax and semantics, vol. 3: Speech acts , ed. Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic.

Grice, H. P. 1989. Study in the way of words . Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Grimes, J. 1975. The thread of discourse . The Hague: Mouton.

Gutiérrez, K. 2008. Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly 43 (2): 148–164.

Habermas, J. 1971a. Erkenntnis und Interesse . Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

Habermas, J. 1971b. Vorbereitende Bemerkungen zu einer Theorie der kommunikativen Kompetenz. In Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie, ed. J. Habermas and N. Luhmann. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

Habermas, J. 1975. Legitimation crisis . Trans: T. McCarthy. Boston: Beacon.

Habermas, J. 1981. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns . Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

Habermas, J. 1984. Theory of communicative action , vol 1: Reason and the rationalization of society . Trans: T. McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.

Habermas, J. 1998. Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy . Cambridge: MIT Press.

Haig, E. 2004. Some observations on the critique of critical discourse analysis. Studies in Language and Culture 25 (2): 129–149.

Hall, S. 1982. The rediscovery of “ideology”: Return of the repressed in media studies. In Culture, society and the media, ed. M. Gurevitch, T. Bennet, J. Curran, and J. Woollacott, 56–90. London: Methuen.

Hall, S., C. Critcher, T. Jefferson, J. Clarke, and B. Roberts. 1978. Policing the crisis . London: Macmillan.

Halliday, M. A. K. 1971. Linguistic function and literary style: An enquiry into the language of William Golding’s The Inheritors . In Literary style: A symposium, ed. S. Chatman, 330–365. New York: Oxford University Press.

Halliday, M. A. K. 1973. Explorations in the function of language . London: Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K. 1976. Anti-languages. UEA Papers in Linguistics 1:15–45.

Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning . London: Edward Arnold/Baltimore: University Park Press.

Halliday, M. A. K. 1985. An introduction to functional grammar . 2nd ed. London: Arnold. (1994).

Halliday, M. A. K., and R. Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English . London: Longman.

Hamilton, D., ed. 1981. Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior . Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

Hariman, R. 1995. Political style: The artistry of power . Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Haroche, C., P. Henry, and M. Pêcheux. 1971. La sémantique et la coupure saussurienne: langue, langage, discours. Langages 24:93–106.

Harré, R. 1967. An introduction to the logic of the sciences . London: Macmillan.

Hart, C. 2010. Critical discourse analysis and cognitive science: New perspectives on immigration discourse . Hertfordshire: Palgrave-Macmillan.

Hart, C. 2011. Moving beyond metaphor in the cognitive linguistic approach to CDA: Construal operations in immigration discourse. In Critical discourse studies in context and cognition, ed. C. Hart, 71–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Hartley, J. 1982. Understanding news . London: Methuen.

Harvey, D. 1996. Justices, nature and the geography of difference . Oxford: Blackwell.

Hawisher, G. E., and C. L. Selfe. 1991. The rhetoric of technology and the electronic writing class. College Composition and Communication 42 (1): 55–65.

Hawisher, G. E., C. L. Selfe, B. Moraski, and M. Pearson. 2004. Becoming literate in the information age: Cultural ecologies and the literacies of technology. College Composition and Communication 55 (4): 642–692.

Hobsbawm, E. 1977. Gramsci and political theory. Marxism Today 21 (7):205–213.

Hodge, B., and G. R. Kress. 1988. Social semiotics . Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Hodge, B., G. Kress, and G. Jones. 1979. The ideology of middle management. In Language and control , ed. R. Fowler, B. Hodge, G. Kress, and T. Trew, 81–93. London: Routledge.

Hoggart, R. 1976. Foreword. In Bad news . Vol. I, ed. Glasgow University Media Group. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Holmes, J. 1986. The function of you know in women and men’s speech. Language in Society 15:1–21.

Holmes, J. 1996. Sex and language. In Kontaktlinguistik — Contact Linguistics — Linguistique du contact, ed. H. Goebl, P. Nelde, Z. Stary, and W. Wölck, 720–725. Berlin: de Gruyter.

Holmes, J. 1997. Story-telling in New Zealand women’s and men’s talk. In Gender and Discourse, ed. R. Wodak, 263–293. London: Sage.

Holmes, J. 2005. Power and discourse at work: Is gender relevant? In Feminist critical discourse analysis, ed. M. Lazar, 31–60. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

Holsanova, J. 2008. Discourse, vision, and cognition . Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Hong, J. J. W. 2012. “Challenge” or “collaboration” social interaction and recontextualization: McDonald’s CSR report. Critical Discourse Studies 9 (2): 149–162.

Honzl, J. 1976. Dynamics of the sign in the theatre. In Semiotics of art: Prague School contributions, ed. L. Matejka and I. Titunik. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Hornberger, N. H. 2011. Dell H. Hymes: His scholarship and legacy in anthropology and education. Anthropology & Education Quarterly 42 (4): 310–318.

Hornberger, N., and S. McKay, eds. 2010. Sociolinguistics and language education . Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Huckin, T., J. Andrus, and J. Clary-Lemon. 2012. Critical discourse analysis and rhetoric and composition. College Composition and Communication 64 (1): 107–129.

Hudson, R. 1996. Sociolinguistics . 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hyland, K., and B. Paltridge, eds. 2011. The Bloomsbury companion to discourse analysis . London: Bloomsbury.

Hymes, D., ed. 1969a. Reinventing anthropology . New York: Random House.

Hymes, D. 1969b. The use of anthropology: Critical, political, personal. In Reinventing anthropology, ed. D. Hymes, 3–79. New York: Random House.

Hymes, D. 1972. On communicative competence. In Sociolinguistics, eds. J. Pride and J. Holmes, 269–293. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Hymes, D. 1977. Foundations in sociolinguistics . London: Tavistock Press.

Hymes, D. 1980. Speech and language: On the origins and foundations of inequality among speakers. In Language in education: Ethnolinguistic essays, ed. D. H. Hymes, 19–61. Washington: Center for Applied Linguistics.

Hymes, D. 1996. Ethnography, linguistics, narrative inequality: Toward an understanding of voice . Bristol: Taylor and Francis.

Hymes, D., and J. Fought. 1975/1981. American structuralism. In Current trends in linguistics, vol. 13: Historiography of linguistics, ed. T. Sebeok, 903–1176. The Hague: Mouton (Reissued as Hymes and Fought 1981. American structuralism . The Hague: Mouton).

Ingham, R., S. Hall, J. Clarke, J. Marsh, and J. Donovan. 1978. Football Hooliganism, the Wider Context . London: Inter-Action Imprint.

Isbuga-Erel, R. F. 2008. A CDA approach to the translation of taboos in literary texts within the historical and socio-political Turkish context. In Papers from the Lancaster University postgraduate conference in linguistics & language teaching . Vol. 2, ed. M. Khosravinik and A. Polyzou, 58–77. Lancaster: Lancaster University.

Jäger, M. 1996. Fatale effekte. Die Kritik am Patriarchat im Einwanderungsdiskurs . Duisburg: DISS.

Jäger, M., and S. Jäger. 2007. Deutungskämpfe: Theorie und Praxis Kritischer Diskursanalyse . Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

Jäger, S. 1993. Kritische Diskursanalyse . Münster: Unrast Verlag.

Jäger, S. 1999. Einen Königsweg gibt es nicht. Bemerkungen zur Durchführung von Diskursanalysen. In Das Wuchern der Diskurse: Perspektiven der Diskursanalyse Foucaults, ed. Hannelore Bublitz, Andrea D. Bührmann, Christine Hanke, and Andrea Seier, 136–147. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus.

Jäger, S. 2004. Kritische Diskursanalyse . 4th unrevised ed. Münster: Unrast.

Jäger, S., and Maier, F. 2009. Theoretical and methodological aspects of Foucauldian critical discourse analysis and dispositive analysis. In Methods of critical discourse analysis, ed. R. Wodak and M. Meyer, 34–61. London: Sage.

Jakobson, R. 1971. Studies in verbal art . Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.

Jameson, F. 1981. The political unconscious . London: Psychology Press.

Jaworski, A., and N. Coupland, eds. 1999. The discourse reader . London: Routledge.

Jefferson, G. 1974. Error correction as an interactional resource. Language in Society 2:181–199.

Jefferson, G. 1978. Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. In Studies in the organization of conversational interaction, ed. Jim Schenkein. New York: Academic Press.

Jewitt, C. 2006. Technology, literacy and learning: A multimodal approach . London: Routledge.

Jewitt, C., and G. Kress. 2003. Multimodal literacy . New York: Peter Lang.

Johnson, D. C. 2011. Critical discourse analysis and the ethnography of language policy. Critical Discourse Studies 8 (4): 267–279.

Johnstone, B. 2008. Discourse analysis . Malden: Blackwell.

Katz, E., and P. Lazarsfeld. 1955. Personal Influence . New York: Free Press.

Kecskes, I. 2014. Can intercultural pragmatics bring some new insight into pragmatic theories? In this volume .

Keating, E., and A. Duranti. 2011. Discourse and culture. In Discourse studies, ed. T. A. van Dijk, 331–356. London: Sage.

Kendall, S., and D. Tannen. 1997. Gender and language in the workplace. In Gender and discourse, ed. R. Wodak, 81–105. London: Sage.

Kheirabadi, R., and S. B. A. Moghaddam. 2012. The linguistic representation of Iranian and Western actors of Iran’s nuclear program in international media: A CDA study. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 2 (10), 2183–2188.

Khosravanik, M. 2010. The representation of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in British newspapers: A critical discourse analysis. Journal of Language and Politics 9 (1): 1–28.

Kim, K. H. 2014. Examining US news media discourses about North Korea: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society 25 (2): 221–244.

Kitzinger, C. 2000. Doing feminist conversation analysis. Feminism & Psychology 10:163–93.

Klemperer, V. 1995. Ich will Zeugnis ablegen bis zum letzten. Tagebücher 1933–1941 , ed. Walter Nowojski unter Mitarbeit von Hadwig Klemperer. Berlin: Aufbau-Verlag.

Klemperer, V. 1999–2001. I will bear witness: a Diary of the Nazi years . Vol. 1: 1933–1941, Vol. 2: 1942–1945. Trans: M. Chamers. New York: Modern Library.

Koller, V. 2004. Metaphor and gender in business media discourse: A critical cognitive study . Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Koller, V. 2005. Critical discourse analysis and social cognition: Evidence from business media discourse. Discourse & Society 16 (2): 199–224.

Koller, V., and P. Davidson. 2008. Social exclusion as conceptual and grammatical metaphor: A cross-genre study of British policy-making. Discourse & Society 19 (3): 307–331.

Kotthoff, W., and R. Wodak. 1997. Communicating gender in context . Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Kövecses, Z. 2000. Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture and body in human feeling . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kövecses, Z. 2006. Language, mind, and culture: A practical introduction . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kramsch, C. 2002. Language and culture: A social semiotic perspective. ADFL Bulletin. 33 (2): 9–15.

Kress, G. 1976. Halliday: System and function in language . London: Oxford University Press.

Kress, G. 1985a. Ideological structures in discourse. In Handbook of discourse analysis . Vol. 4, ed. T. A. van Dijk, 27–42. London: Academic.

Kress, G. 1985b. Linguistic processes in sociocultural practice . Victoria: Deakin University Press.

Kress, G. 1989. Linguistic processes in sociocultural practice . Oxford: Oxford University Press [new edition of 1985b].

Kress, G. 1990. Critical discourse analysis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 11:84–97.

Kress, G. 2010. Multimodality. A social semiotic approach to communication . London: Routledge.

Kress, G. 2011. Discourse analysis and education: A multimodal social semiotic approach. In An Introduction to critical discourse analysis in education . 2nd ed., ed. R. Rogers, 205–226. New York: Routledge.

Kress, G. 2012. Discourse analysis and education: A multimodal social semiotic approach. In An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education . 2nd ed., ed. R. Rogers, 205–226. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Kress, G., and R. Hodge. 1979. Language as ideology . 2nd ed. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul (R. Hodge and G. Kress 1993. Language as ideology . London: Routledge).

Kress, G., and T. van Leeuwen. 1996/2006. Reading images: The grammar of visual design . London: Routledge.

Kress, G., and T. van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication . London: Arnold.

Krzyzanowski, M. 2010. The discursive construction of European identities: A multi-level approach to discourse and identity in the transforming European Union . Bern: Peter Lang.

Krzyzanowski, M. 2011. Ethnography and critical discourse analysis: Towards a problem-oriented research dialogue. Critical Discourse Studies 8 (4): 231–238.

Krzyzanowski, M., and R. Wodak. 2009. The politics of exclusion: Debating migration in Austria . New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

Kubota, R. 1999. Japanese culture constructed by discourses: Implications for applied linguistics research and ELT. Tesol Quarterly 33 (1): 9–35.

Kuhn, T. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions . Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Labov, W. 1966a. Hypercorrection by the lower middle class as a factor in linguistic change. In Sociolinguistic patterns, ed. W. Labov, 122–143. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press (1991).

Labov, W. 1966b. The social stratification of English in New York City . Washington: Center for Applied Linguistics.

Labov, W. 1971. The notion of ‘system’ in creole languages. In Pidginization and Creolization of Languages, ed. D. Hymes, 447–472. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Labov, W., and J. Waletzky. 1967. Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In Essays on the verbal and visual arts, ed. J. Helm. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind . Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Lakoff, G. 1991. Metaphor and war: The metaphor system used to justify the war in the gulf. Journal of Urban and Cultural Studies 2:59–72.

Lakoff, G. 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Metaphor and thought . 2nd ed., ed. A. Ortony, 202–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by . Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Lam, W. 2009. Literacy and learning across transnational online spaces. E-learning 6 (4): 303–324.

Langacker, R. W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. I. Theoretical prerequisites . Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Langacker, R. W. 1991. Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 2. Descriptive application . Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Langacker, R. W. 2002. Concept, image and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar . 2nd ed. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Langacker, R. W. 2008. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lantolf, J, and S. Thorne. 2006. Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lau, S. 2013. A study of critical literacy work with beginning English language learners: An integrated approach. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies 10 (1): 1–30.

Lazar, M., ed. 2005a. Feminist critical discourse analysis: Gender, power and ideology in discourse . Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

Lazar, M. 2005b. Politicizing gender in discourse: Feminist critical discourse analysis as political perspective and praxis. In Feminist critical discourse analysis: Gender, power and ideology in discourse, ed. M. Lazar, 1–30. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

Lazar, M. 2005c. Performing state fatherhood: The remaking of hegemony. In Feminist critical discourse analysis: Gender, power and ideology in discourse, ed. M. Lazar, 139–163. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

Lazar, M. 2007. Feminist critical discourse analysis: Articulating a feminist discourse praxis. Critical Discourse Studies 4:141–167.

Lecourt, D. 1975. Marxism and epistemology: Bachleard, Canguilhem and Foucault . London: New Left Books.

Leech, G. N. 1983. Principles of pragmatics . London: Longman.

Leont’ev, A. 1978. Activity, consciousness, and personality . Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

Levinson, S. 1983. Pragmatics . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lewis, C., and J. Ketter. 2011. Learning as social interaction: Interdiscursivity in a teacher and researcher study group. In An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education . 2nd ed., ed. R. Rogers, 128–153. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Lewis, C., P. Enciso, and B. Moje. 2007. Reframing sociocultural research on literacy: Identity, agency and power. TESL-EJ 12 (3): 1–4.

Lindekens, R. 1971. Eléments pour une sémiotique de la photographie . Paris: Didier.

Link, J. 1983. Was ist und was bringt Diskurstaktik. kultuRRevolution 2:60–66.

Link, J. 1992. Die Analyse der symbolischen Komponente realer Ereignisse: Ein Beitrag der Diskurstheorie zur Analyse neorassistischer Äusserungen. In Der Diskurs des Rassismus . Vol. 46, ed. S. Jäger and F. Januschek, 37–52. Oldenburg: Osnabrücker Beiträge zur Sprachtheorie.

Louw, B. 1993. Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer? The diagnostic potential of semantic prosodies. In Text and technology: In honour of John Sinclair, ed. M. Baker, G. Francis, and E. Tognini-Bonelli, 157–176. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Luke, A. 2002. Beyond science and ideological critique: Developments in critical discourse analysis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 22: 96–110.

Luke, A. 2004. Notes on the future of critical discourse studies. Critical Discourse Studies 38 (1): 132–141.

Lutz, B., and R. Wodak. 1987. Information für Informierte. Linguistische Studien zu Verständlichkeit und Verstehen von Hörfunknachrichten. Wien: Akademie der Wissenschaften.

Maalej, Z. 2007. Doing critical discourse analysis with the contemporary theory of metaphor: Towards a discourse model of metaphor. In Cognitive linguistics in critical discourse analysis: Application and theory, ed. C. Hart and D. Lukes, 132–158. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Macgilchrist, F. 2007. Positive discourse analysis: Contesting dominant discourses by reframing the issue. Critical Approaches to Discourse Across the Disciplines 1 (1): 74–94.

Machin, D. 2007. Introduction to multimodal analysis . New York: Oxford University Press.

Machin, D. 2013. What is multimodal critical discourse studies? Discourse studies 10: 347–355.

Machin, D., and A. Mayr. 2007. Antiracism in the British government’s model regional newspaper: The “talking cure”. Discourse & Society 18 (4): 453–478.

Machin, D., and A. Mayr. 2012a. How to do critical discourse analysis: A multimodal introduction . Los Angeles: Sage.

Machin, D., and A. Mayr. 2012b. Corporate crime and the discursive deletion of responsibility: A case study of the Paddington rail crash. Crime Media Culture 9 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1177/1741659012450294.

Machin, D., and U. Suleiman. 2006. Arab and American computer war games: The influence of a global technology on discourse. Critical Discourse Studies 3 (1): 1–22.

Malinowski, B. 1935. Coral Gardens and their Magic . London: Allen and Unwin.

Marinara, M., J. Alexander, W. P. Banks, and S. Blackmon. 2009. Cruising composition texts: Negotiating sexual difference in first-year readers. College Composition and Communication 60: 269–296.

Marmaridou, S. 2011. Pragmalinguistics and sociopragmatics. In Foundations of pragmatics, ed. W. Bublitz and N. Norrick, 77–106. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

Martin, C. A. 1997. Staging the reality principle: System-functional linguistics and the context of theatre. PhD Thesis. Macquarie University, Sydney.

Martin, J. R. 1984. Lexical cohesion, field, and genre: Parceling experience and discourse goals. In Linguistics and semiotics: Text semantics and discourse semantics. Proceedings of the second rice symposium, ed. J. Copeland. Houston: Rice University Press.

Martin, J. R. 1992. English text: System and structure . Amsterdam: Benjamins.Martin, J. R. 1999. Grace: The logogenesis of freedom. Critical Discourse Studies 1 (1): 29–56. Reprinted in Toolan, M. (ed.). 2002. Critical discourse analysis: Critical concepts in linguistics, Vol. 3, 170–201. London: Routledge.

Martin, J. R. 2000. Close reading: Functional linguistics as a tool for critical discourse analysis. In Researching language in schools and communities: Functional linguistic perspectives, ed. L. Unsworth, 275–302. London: Cassell.

Martin, J. R. 2002a. Blessed are the peacemakers: Reconciliation and evaluation. In Research and practice in professional discourse, ed. C. Candlin, 187–227. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press.

Martin, J. R. 2002b. Positive discourse analysis: Power, solidarity and change. In Critical discourse analysis: Critical concepts in linguistics . Vol. 3, ed. M. Toolan, 170–201. London: Routledge.

Martin, J. R., and D. Rose. 2003. Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause . London: Continuum.

Martin, J. R. 2004. Mourning: How we get aligned. Discourse and Society 15 (2–3): 321–344.

Martinec, R. 1998. Cohesion in action. Semiotica 120:161–180.

Martinez, A. 2009. The American way: Resisting the empire of force and color-blind racism. College English 71 (6): 584–595.

Martinez, G. 2003. Classroom based dialect awareness in heritage language instruction: A critical applied linguistic approach. Heritage Language Journal 1 (1): 1–14.

Marx, K., and F. Engels. 1845/1970. The German ideology . Trans: C. Arthur. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

Masuda, A. 2012. Critical literacy and teacher identities: A discursive site of struggle. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies 9 (3): 220–246.

Mautner, G. 2008. Analyzing newspapers, magazines and other print media. In Qualitative discourse analysis in the social sciences, ed. R. Wodak and M. Kryzanowski, 30–53. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

Mautner, G. 2010. Language and the market society: Critical reflections on discourse and dominance. London: Routledge.

Maynard, D. 1980. Placement of topic changes in conversation. Semiotica 30:263–290.

McElhinny, B. 1997. Ideologies of public and private language in sociolinguistics. In Gender and Discourse, ed. R. Wodak, 106–139. London: Sage.

McGrath, T. 2008. The role of the national ESL scales in the production of culturally competent Australian citizens: A Foucauldian analysis. Unpublished Honours Thesis. The University of Sydney, Australia.

McInnes, D. P. R. 1998. Attending to the instance: Towards a systemic based dynamic and responsive analysis of composite performance text. PhD Thesis, University of Sydney.

McKay, S., and N. Hornberger, eds. 1996. Sociolinguistics and language teaching . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

McKenna, B. 2004. Critical discourse studies: Where to from here? Critical Discourse Studies 1 (1): 9–39.

Meadows, B. 2007. Distancing and showing solidarity via metaphor and metonymy in political discourse: A critical study of American statements on Iraq during the years 2004–2005. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines 1 (2): 1–17.

Meadows, B. 2009. Nationalism and language learning at the US/Mexico border: An ethnographically sensitive critical discourse analysis of nation, power, and privilege in an English language classroom (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Tucson: University of Arizona.

Medina, C. 2010. Reading across communities in biliteracy practices: Examining translocal discourses and cultural flows in literature discussions. Reading Research Quarterly 45 (1): 40–60.

Metz, C. 1974a. Film language . New York: Oxford University Press.

Metz, C. 1974b. Language and cinema . The Hague: Mouton.

Mey, I. 2001. The CA/CDA controversy. Journal of Pragmatics 33 (4): 609–615.

Mey, J. 1979. Introduction. In Pragmalinguistics: Theory and practice, ed. J. Mey, 9–17. The Hague: Mouton.

Mey, J. 2000. When voices clash: A study in literary pragmatics . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Mey, J. 2001. Pragmatics: An introduction . 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.

Meyer, M. 2001. Between theory, method and politics: Positioning of the approaches to CDA. In Methods of critical discourse analysis, ed. R. Wodak and M. Meyer, 14–31. London: Sage.

Milroy, J., and L. Milroy. 1978. Belfast: Change and variation in an urban vernacular. In Sociolinguistic patterns in British English, ed. P. Trudgill, 19–36. London: Arnold.

Mills, S. 1995. Feminist stylistics . London: Routledge.

Minsky, A. 1980. A framework for representing knowledge. In Frame conceptions and text understanding, ed. D. Metzing, 1–25. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Mittelberg, I. 2008. Peircean semiotics meets conceptual metaphor: Iconic modes in gestural representations of grammar. In Metaphor and gesture, ed. A. Cienki and C. Müller, 115–154. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Mittelberg, I., and L. Waugh. 2009. Metonymy first, metaphor second: A cognitive-semiotic approach to multimodal figures of thought in co-speech gestures. In Multimodal metaphor , ed. C. Forceville and E. Urios-Aparisi, 329–356. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Moll, L., ed. 1990. Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Moll, L. 2014. L.S. Vygotsky and education . New York: Routledge.

Moscovici, S. 2000. Social representations: Explorations in social psychology . ed. G. Duveen. Cambridge: Polity.

Mukařovský, J. 1976. Art as semiotic fact. And the essence of the visual arts. In Semiotics of art: Prague school contributions, ed. L. Matejka and I. Titunik. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Mulderrig, J. 2012. The hegemony of inclusion: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis of deixis in education policy. Discourse & Society 23 (6): 1–28.

Müller, C. 2004. Forms and uses of the palm up open hand: A case of a gesture family? In The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures, ed. C. Müller and R. Posner, 233–256. Berlin: Weidler.

Müller, C., and A. Cienki. 2009. When speech and gesture come together: Forms of multimodal metaphor in the use of spoken language. In Multimodal metaphor, ed. C. Forceville and E. Urios-Aparisi, 297–328. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Musolff, A. 2004. Metaphor and political discourse: Analogical reasoning in debates about Europe . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Musolff, A. 2006. Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 21 (1): 23–38.

Musolff, A. 2007. What role do metaphors play in racial prejudice? The function of antisemitic imagery in Hitler’s “Mein Kampf”. Patterns of Prejudice 41 (1): 21–44.

Musolff, A. 2010. Metaphor, nation and the holocaust. The concept of the body politic . London: Routledge.

Musolff, A. 2012. Special feature: The study of metaphor as part of critical discourse analysis. Critical Discourse Studies 9 (3): 301–310.

Nattiez, J. J. 1976. Fondéments d’une sémiologie musicale . Paris: Uge.

Newfield, D. 2011. Multimodality, social justice and becoming a “really South African” democracy: Case studies from language classrooms. In Social justice language teacher education, ed. M. R. Hawkins, 23–48. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Newmeyer, F. J. 1986. Linguistic theory in America: The first quarter century of transformational generative grammar . 2nd ed. Orlando: Academic.

Nichols, J. 1984. Functional theories of grammar. Annual Review of Anthropology 13:97–117.

Nordensvard, J. 2013. The mass production of quality ‘human material’: Economic metaphors and compulsory sterilization in Sweden. Critical Discourse Studies 10 (2): 172–186.

O’Halloran, K. 1999. Interdependence, interaction and metaphor in multisemiotic texts. Social Semiotics 9 (3): 317–354.

O’Halloran, K., and C. Coffin. 2004. Checking overinterpretation and underinterpretation: Help from corpora in critical linguistics. In Applying English grammar, ed. A. Hewings, C. Coffin, and K. O’Halloran, 275–297. London: Arnold.

O’Halloran, K. L., S. Tan, B. Smith, and A. Podlasov. 2011. Multimodal analysis within an interactive software environment: Critical discourse perspectives. Critical Discourse Studies 8 (2): 109–125.

Olausson, U. 2009. Global warming—global responsibility? Media frames of collective action and scientific certainty. Public Understanding of Science 18 (4): 421–436.

Ortanez, M., and S. Glantz. 2009. Trafficking in tobacco farm culture: Tobacco companies’ use of video imagery to undermine health policy. Visual Anthropology Review 25 (1): 1–24.

O’Toole, M. 1994/2011. The language of displayed art . Leicester: Routledge.

Paltridge, B. 2012. Discourse analysis . 2nd ed. London: Bloomsbury (1st ed.: 2006. London: Continuum).

Panagl, O., and R. Wodak. 2004. Text und Kontext. Theoriemodelle und methodische Verfahren im transdisziplinären Vergleich . Würzburg: Königshausen and Neumann.

Pavlenko, A. 2005. Ask each pupil about her methods of cleaning: Ideologies of language and gender in Americanisation instruction (1900–1924). The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 8 (4): 275–297.

Pêcheux, M. 1982. Language, semantics, and ideology: Stating the obvious . London: Macmillan. (Trans: By H. Nagpal of Les vérités de La Palice , 1975).

Pennycook, A. 1990. Towards a critical applied linguistics for the 1990s. Issues in Applied Linguistics 1:8–28.

Pennycook, A. 1997. Critical applied linguistics and education. In Encyclopedia of language and education, ed. R. Wodak and D. Corson, 23–31. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

Pennycook, A. 2004. 32 Critical applied linguistics. In The handbook of applied linguistics, ed. A. Davies and C. Elder, 784–807. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

Peyroux, E. 2012. Legitimating business improvement districts in Johannesburg: A discursive perspective on urban regeneration and policy transfer. European Urban and Regional Studies 19 (2): 181–194.

Pfeiffer, O. E., E. Strouhal, and R. Wodak. 1987. Recht und Sprache . Vienna: Orac.

Popkewitz, T., and S. Lindblad. 2000. Educational governance and social inclusion and exclusion: Some conceptual difficulties and problematics in policy and research. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 21 (1): 5–44.

Portero-Muñoz, C. 2011. Noun-noun euphemisms in the language of the global financial crisis. Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies 33 (2): 137–157.

Prussing, E. 2008. Sobriety and its cultural politics: An ethnographer’s perspective on “culturally appropriate” addiction services in Native North America. ETHOS 36 (3): 354–375.

Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech, J. Svartvik. 1972. A grammar of contemporary English . London: Longman.

Reisigl, M. 2011. (Critical) discourse studies and pragmatics: Commonalities and differences. In Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition, ed. C. Hart, 7–26.

Reisigl, M., and R. Wodak. 2001. Discourse and discrimination, rhetorics of racism and antiSemitism . London: Routledge.

Reisigl, M., and R. Wodak. 2009. The discourse historical approach. In Methods of critical discourse analysis , ed. R. Wodak and M. Meyer, 87–121. London: Sage.

Riad, S., and E. Vaara. 2011. Varieties of national metonymy in media accounts of international mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Management Studies 48 (4): 737–771.

Richards, J., J. Platt, and H. Weber. 1985. Longman dictionary of applied linguistics . London: Longman.

Richardson, E. 2007. ‘She was workin like foreal’: Critical literacy and discourse practices of African American females in the age of hip hop. Discourse & Society 18 (6): 789–809.

Richardson, J., and M. Colombo. 2013. Continuity and change in anti-immigrant discourse in Italy: An analysis of the visual propaganda of the Lega Nord. Journal of Language and Politics 12 (2): 180–202.

Richardson, K. 1987. Critical linguistics and textual diagnosis. Text 7:145–163.

Ritivoi, A. D. 2008. Talking the (political) talk: Cold War refugees and their legitimation through style. In Rhetoric in detail: Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture , ed. B. Johnstone and C. Eisenhart. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Rogers, R. 2002. Through the eyes of the institution: A critical discourse analysis of decision making in two special education meetings. Anthropology & Education Quarterly 33 (2): 213–237.

Rogers, R., ed. 2011a. An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education . 2nd ed. New York: Routledge [1st ed.: 2004, Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum].

Rogers, R. 2011b. Critical approaches to discourse analysis in educational research. In An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education . 2nd ed., ed. R. Rogers, 1–20. New York: Routledge [1st ed.: 2004, Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum].

Rogers R., and M. Mosley. 2008. A critical discourse analysis of racial literacy in teacher education. Linguistics and Education 19 (2): 107–131.

Rogers, R., and M. Mosley-Wetzel. 2013. Studying agency in literacy teacher education: A layered approach to positive discourse analysis. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies 10 (1): 62–92.

Rogers, R., E. Malancharuvil-Berke, M. Mosley, D. Hui, and G. O’Garro Joseph. 2005. Critical discourse analysis in education: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research 75 (3): 365–416. doi:10.3102/00346543075003365.

Roloff, M., and C. Berger. 1982. Social cognition and communication . Beverly Hills: Sage.

Ryle, G. 1945. Philosophical arguments . Oxford: Clarendon.

Rymes, B. 2009. Critical discourse analysis: A tool for critical reflection . Cresskill: Hampton.

Saint, S. 2008. A critical discourse analysis of corporate environmental harm. Internet Journal of Criminology 1–29. http://www.internetjournalofcriminology.com/Saint%20 -.

Santa Ana, O. 1999. Like an animal I was treated: Anti-immigrant metaphor in US public discourse. Discourse & Society 10 (2): 191–224.

Santa Ana, O. 2002. Brown tide rising: Metaphors of Latinos in contemporary American public discourse . Austin: University of Texas Press.

Santa Ana, O. 2013. Juan in a hundred: The representation of Latinos on network news . Austin: University of Texas Press.

Schank, R., and R. Abelson. 1977. Scripts, plans, goals and understanding . Norwood: Ablex.

Schmitt, N., and M. Celce-Murcia. 2002. An overview of applied linguistics. In An introduction to applied linguistics, ed. N. Schmitt, 1–16. London: Arnold.

Scholte, B. 1969. Toward a reflexive and critical anthropology. In Reinventing anthropology, ed. D. Hymes, 430–457. New York: Random House.

Scollo, M. 2011. Cultural approaches to discourse analysis: A theoretical and methodological conversation with special focus on Donal Carbaugh’s cultural discourse theory. Journal of Multicultural Discourses 6 (1): 1–32.

Searle, J. 1969. Speech acts . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Searle, J. 1979. Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts . New York: Cambridge University Press.

Shardakova, I., and A. Pavlenko. 2004. Identity options in Russian textbooks. Journal of Language Identity and Education 3 (1): 25–46.

Shi-Xu. 2005. A cultural approach to discourse . New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Shi-Xu. 2012. Why do cultural discourse studies? Towards a culturally conscious and critical approach to human discourses. Critical arts 26 (4): 484–503.

Slembrouck, S. 2001. Explanation, interpretation and critique in the analysis of discourse. Critique of Anthropology 21 (1): 33–57.

Strawson, P. 1950. On referring. Mind 59:320–344.

Stubbs, M. 1996. Text and corpus analysis . Oxford: Blackwell.

Stubbs, M. 1997. Whorf’s children: Critical comments on critical discourse analysis. In Evolving models of language, ed. A. Wray and A. Ryan, 100–116. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Stubbs, M. 2001. Words and phrases: Corpus studies of lexical semantics . Oxford: Blackwell.

Tajfel, H., ed. 1981. Differentiation between social groups . London: Academic.

Tajfel, H. 1982. Social identity and intergroup relations . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Takayama, K. 2009. Is Japanese education the “exception”? Examining the situated articulation of neo-liberalism through the analysis of policy. Asia-Pacific Journal of Education 29 (2): 125–142.

Talbot, M. 2005. Choosing to refuse to be a victim: ‘Power feminism’ and the intertextuality of victimhood and choice. In Feminist critical discourse analysis: Gender, power and ideology in discourse , ed. M. Lazar, 167–180. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

Talmy, L. 1988. Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science 12:49–100.

Talmy, L. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics . Cambridge: MIT Press.

Taylor, N. 2008. Critical analysis of the adult literacy curriculum: Instructional or regulative? Research in Post-Compulsory Education 13 (3): 307–314.

Therborn, G. 1980. The ideology of power and the power of ideology . London: Verso.

Thibault, P. 1986. Text, discourse and content: A social semiotic perspective . Toronto: Toronto Semiotic Circle [Toronto Semiotic Circle Monographs. Vol. 3].

Thibault, P. 1989. Genres, codes and pedagogy: Towards a critical social semiotic account. Southern Review 21 (3): 243–264.

Thibault, P. 1991. Social semiotics as praxis . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Thomas, J. 1983. Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics 4 (2): 91–112.

Thomas, A. 2014. Points of difference: Intermodal complementarity and social critical literacy in children’s multimodal texts. In Critical multimodal studies of popular discourse, ed. E. Djonov and S. Zhao, 217–231. London: Routledge.

Thompson, J. 1984. Studies in the theory of ideology . Cambridge: Polity Press.

Thompson, S. 1992. Functional grammar. In International encyclopedia of linguistics, ed. W. Bright, 37–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Threadgold, T. 2003. Cultural studies, critical theory and critical discourse analysis: Histories, remembering and futures. Linguistik Online 14 (2): 5–37.

Titscher, S., M. Meyer, R. Wodak, and E. Vetter. 2000. Methods of text and discourse analysis . London: Routledge (Trans: B. Jenner).

Tolson, A. 2006. Media talk: Spoken discourse on TV and radio . Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Tomasello, M. 2008. Origins of human communication . Cambridge: MIT Press.

Toolan, M. J. 1988. Narrative: A critical linguistic introduction . London: Routledge (2nd ed.: 2001).

Toolan, M. J., ed. 2002. Critical discourse analysis. 3. Concurrent analyses and critiques . Vol. 3. London: Taylor & Francis.

Trudgill, P. 1972. Sex, covert prestige, and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society 1:179–196.

Trudgill, P. 1974. The social differentiation of English in Norwich . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Unsworth, L. 2014. Point of view in picture books and animated film adaptations: Informing critical multimodal comprehension and composition pedagogy. In Critical multimodal studies of popular discourse, ed. E. Djonov and S. Zhao, 202–216. London: Routledge.

van Dijk, T. A. 1977. Text and context . London: Longman.

van Dijk, T. A. 1981. Studies in the pragmatics of discourse . The Hague: Mouton.

van Dijk, T. A. 1984. Prejudice in discourse: An analysis of ethnic prejudice in cognition and conversation . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

van Dijk, T. A., ed. 1985a. Handbook of discourse analysis, 4 vols . London: Academic Press.

van Dijk, T. A., ed. 1985b. Discourse and communication. Berlin: de Gruyter.

van Dijk, T. A. 1985c. Cognitive situation models in discourse production: The expression of ethnic situations in prejudiced discourse. In Language and social situations, ed. J. Forgas, 61–80. New York: Springer.

van Dijk, T. A. 1986. A programm [sic] for critical discourse analysis. Unpublished.

van Dijk, T. A. 1987a. Communicating racism: Ethnic prejudice in thought and talk . Newbury Park: Sage.

van Dijk, T. A. 1987b. Schoolvoorbeelden van racisme: De reproduktie van racisme in maatschappijleerboeken ( Textbook examples of racism: The reproduction of racism in social science textbooks ). Amsterdam: Socialistische Uitgeverij Amsterdam.

van Dijk, T. A. 1987c. News analysis. Case studies in national and international news in the press: Lebanon, ethnic minorities, refugees and squatters . Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

van Dijk, T. A. 1987d. Elite discourse and racism. In Approaches to discourse, poetics and psychiatry, ed. I. Zavala, T. van Dijk, and M. Diaz-Diocaretz, 81–122. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

van Dijk, T. A. 1988a. News as discourse . Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

van Dijk, T. A. 1988b. News analysis: Case studies of international and national news in the press . Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

van Dijk, T. A. 1989a. Mediating racism: The role of the media in the reproduction of racism. In Language, power and ideology: Studies in political discourse, ed. R. Wodak, 199–226. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

van Dijk, T. A. 1989b. Structures of discourse and structures of power. In Communication yearbook 12, ed. J. Anderson, 18–59. Los Angeles: Sage.

van Dijk, T. A. 1990. Discourse & society: A new journal for a new research focus. Discourse & Society 1 (1): 5–16. London: Sage.

van Dijk, T. A. 1991a. Racism and the press . London: Routledge.

van Dijk, T. A. 1991b. Editorial: Discourse analysis with a cause. The Semiotic Review of Books 2 (1): 1–2.

van Dijk, T. A. 1992. Discourse and the denial of racism. Discourse & Society 3 (1): 87–118.

van Dijk, T. A. 1993a. Editor’s foreword to critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society 4 (2): 131–132.

van Dijk, T. A. 1993b. Elite discourse and racism . London: Sage.

van Dijk, T. A. 1993c. Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse and Society 4 (2): 249–283.

van Dijk, T. A. 1995. Discourse analysis as ideology analysis. In Language and peace , ed. C. Schäffner and A. Wenden, 17–36. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.

van Dijk, T. A. 1997a. The study of discourse. In Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction, vol. 1: Discourse as structure and process, ed. T. van Dijk, 1–34. London: Sage

van Dijk, T. A. 1998. Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach . London: Sage.

van Dijk, T. A. 1999. Critical discourse analysis and conversation analysis. Discourse and Society 10 (4): 459–460.

van Dijk, T. A. 2001a. Critical discourse analysis. In Handbook of discourse analysis, ed. D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, and H. Hamilton, 352–371. Oxford: Blackwell.

van Dijk, T. A. 2001b. Multidisciplinary CDA: A plea for diversity. In Methods of critical discourse analysis, ed. R. Wodak and M. Meyer, 95–120. London: Sage.

van Dijk, T. A. 2001c. Algunos principios de la teoría del contexto [Some principles of the theory of context]. ALED. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios del Discurso 1 (1): 69–82.

van Dijk, T. A. 2004. From text grammar to critical discourse analysis: A brief academic autobiography. From his website http://www.discourses.org/ .

van Dijk, T. A., ed. 2007. Discourse studies. Sage benchmark studies in discourse analysis . 5 vols. London: Sage.

van Dijk, T. A. 2008. Discourse and context: A socio-cognitive approach . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

van Dijk, T. A. 2009a. Society and discourse: How social contexts influence text and talk . Leiden: Cambridge University Press.

van Dijk, T. A. 2009b. Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach. In Methods of critical discourse analysis, 2nd ed., ed. R. Wodak and M. Meyer, 62–86. London: Sage.

van Dijk, T. A. 2011. Discourse and ideology. In Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction, ed. T. A. van Dijk, 379–407. London: Sage.

van Dijk, T. A. 2012a. The role of the press in the reproduction of racism. In Migrations: Interdisciplinary perspectives, ed. M. Messer, R. Schroeder, and R. Wodak, 15–29. New York: Springer.

van Dijk, T. A. 2012b. Discourse and knowledge. In Handbook of discourse analysis, ed. J. P. Gee and M. Handford, 587–603. London: Routledge.

van Dijk, T. A. 2012c. Knowledge, discourse and domination. In Pragmaticizing understanding. Studies for Jef Verschueren, ed. M. Meeuwis and J. O. Östman, 151–196. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

van Dijk, T. A. 2012d. A note on epistemic discourse analysis. British Journal of Social Psychology 51:478–485 (Special Issue: Twenty five years of discursive psychology. M. Augoustinos (Ed.)).

van Dijk, T. A. 2014a. Racism—thirty years later. In this volume, Berlin: Springer.

van Dijk, T. A. 2014b. Discourse and knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

van Dijk, T. A. 2014c. Ideology. In The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication, ed. G. Mazzoleni.

van Dijk, T. A. 2014d. Discourse-cognition-society: Current state and prospects of the socio-cognitive approach to discourse. In Contemporary Studies in Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. C. Hart and P. Cap.

van Dijk, T. A., and R. Wodak. 1988. Introduction: Discourse, racism, and ideology. Text 8:1–4.

van Leeuwen, T. 1993. Genre and field in critical discourse analysis. Discourse and Society 4 (2): 193–223.

van Leeuwen, T. 1996. The representations of social actors. In Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis, ed. C. R. Caldas-Couthard and M. Coulthard, 32–70. London: Routledge.

van Leeuwen, T. 1999. Speech, music, sound . London: Macmillan.

van Leeuwen, T. 2005. Introducing social semiotics . London: Routledge.

van Leeuwen, T. 2006. Critical discourse analysis. In Encyclopedia of language and linguistics . 2nd ed., Vol. 3, ed. K. Brown, 290–294. Oxford: Elsevier.

van Leeuwen, T. 2008. Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis . New York: Oxford University Press.

van Leeuwen, T. 2009. Discourse as the recontextualization of social practice: A guide. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis 2:144–161.

van Leeuwen, T. 2013. Critical analysis of multimodal discourse. In Encyclopedia of applied linguistics, ed. C. Chapelle, 1–5. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

van Leeuwen, T., and R. Wodak. 1999. Legitimizing immigration control: A discourse-historical analysis. Discourse Studies 1 (1): 83–118.

Velázquez, I. 2008. Intergenerational Spanish language transmission: Attitudes, motivations and linguistic practices in two Mexican American communities. PhD Diss., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Velázquez, I. 2009. Intergenerational Spanish transmission in El Paso, Texas: Parental perceptions of cost/benefit. Spanish in Context 6 (1): 69–84.

Velázquez, I. 2013. Individual discourse, language ideology and Spanish transmission in El Paso, Texas. Critical Discourse Studies 10: 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2013.789975 .

Verschueren, J. 1999. Understanding pragmatics . London: Arnold.

Villanueva, V. 1993. Bootstraps: From an American academic of color . Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English.

Vygotsky, L. S. 1962. Thought and language . Cambridge: MIT Press [E. Hanfmann, G. Vakar (Eds. and Trans.)].

Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in society. In The development of higher psychological processes, ed. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, and E. Souberman. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Wasson, C. 2004. The paradoxical language of enterprise. Critical Discourse Studies 1 (2): 175–199.

Weiss, G., and R. Wodak. 2003. Introduction: Theory, interdisciplinarity and critical discourse analysis. In Critical discourse analysis: Theory and interdisciplinarity, ed. G. Weiss and R. Wodak, 1–32. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Wertsch, J. 1985. Vygotsky and the social formation of mind . Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Widdowson, H. 1998. The theory and practice of critical discourse analysis. Applied Linguistics 19 (1): 136–151.

Widdowson, H. G. 2004. Text, context, pretext: Critical issues in discourse analysis . Oxford: Blackwell.

Wilkinson, S., and C. Kitzinger. 1995. Introduction. In Feminism and discourse: Psychological perspectives, ed. S. Wilkinson and C. Kitzinger, 1–9. London: Sage.

Willen, S. 2011. Do “Illegal” Im/migrants have a right to health? Engaging ethical theory as social practice at a Tel Aviv open clinic. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 25 (3): 303–330.

Williamson, J. 1978. Decoding advertising: Ideology and meaning in advertising . London: Marion Boyers.

Wittgenstein, L. 1953. Philosophical investigations . Oxford: Blackwell.

Wodak, R. 1981. Women relate, men report: Sex differences in language behavior in a therapeutic group. Journal of Pragmatics 5: 70–93.

Wodak, R. 1984. Hilflose Nähe? — Mütter und Töchter erzählen . Vienna: Deuticke.

Wodak, R. 1985. Aspekte des geschichtlichen, geschlechts- und generations-spezifischen Lautwandels in Wien: eine Untersuchung zum Sprachverhalten von Müttern und Töchtern. In Sprachwandel und feministische Sprachpolitik: internationale perspektiven, ed. M. Hellinger. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

Wodak, R. 1986. Language behavior in therapy groups . Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Wodak, R. 1987. At last I know ... Sociolinguistic and psycholinguistic aspects of the therapeutic process and its effect. In Neurotic and Psychotic Language Behaviour , ed. R. Wodak and P. van de Craen, 9–41. Clevedon: Multilingual Affairs.

Wodak, R., ed. 1989. Language, power, and ideology: Studies in political discourse . Vol. 7. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Wodak, R. 1993. Discourse and racism. Special issue of Folia Linguistica .

Wodak, R. 1995. Critical linguistics and critical discourse analysis. In Handbook of pragmatics, ed. J. Verschueren, J.-O. Östman, and J. Blommaert, 204–210. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Wodak, R. 1996. Disorders of discourse . London: Longman.

Wodak, R. 1997a. Introduction: Some important issues in the research of gender and discourse. In Gender and discourse, ed. R. Wodak, 1–20. London: Sage.

Wodak, R., ed. 1997b. Gender and discourse . London: Sage.

Wodak, R. 2001a. The discourse-historical approach. In Methods of critical discourse analysis . 1st ed., ed. R. Wodak and M. Meyer, 63–95. London: Sage.

Wodak, R. 2001b. What CDA is about: A summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. In Methods of critical discourse analysis, ed. R. Wodak and M. Meyer. London: Sage.

Wodak, R. 2004. Vorwort. In Text und kontext. Theoriemodelle und methodische Verfahren im transdisziplinären Vergleich, ed. O. Panagl and R. Wodak, 7–9. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.

Wodak, R. 2005. Gender mainstreaming and the European Union: Interdisciplinarity, gender studies and CDA. In Feminist critical discourse analysis, ed. M. Lazar, 90–113. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

Wodak, R. 2006. Mediation between discourse and society: Assessing cognitive approaches in CDA. Discourse Studies 8 (1): 179–190.

Wodak, R. 2007. Pragmatics and critical discourse analysis: A cross-disciplinary inquiry. Pragmatics and Cognition 15 (1): 203–225.

Wodak, R. 2008. Politics as usual: The discursive construction and representation of politics in action . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Wodak, R. 2009. The discourse of politics in action: Politics as unusual . London: Palgrave.

Wodak, R. 2011a. Critical discourse analysis: Overview, challenges, and perspectives. In Pragmatics of society, ed. G. Andersen and K. Aijmer, 627–650. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.

Wodak, R. 2011b. Critical linguistics and critical discourse analysis. In Discursive pragmatics, ed. J. Östman, P. Ledin, and J. Verschueren, 50–69. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Wodak, R., ed. 2013a. Critical discourse analysis . 4 vols. Los Angeles: Sage.

Wodak, R. 2013b. The strategy of discursive provocation: A discourse-historical analysis of the FPÖ’s discriminatory rhetoric. In Doublespeak: the framing of the far-right since 1945, 99–120. Berlin: ibidem-Verlag.

Wodak, R. 2013c. Dis-citizenship and migration: A critical discourse-analytical perspective. Journal of Language, Identity and Education 12 (3): 173–178.

Wodak, R. 2013d. Editor’s introduction. Critical discourse analysis: Challenges and perspectives. In Critical discourse analysis . Vol. 1, ed. R. Wodak, xxi–xlv. Los Angeles: Sage.

Wodak, R., and G. Benke. 1996. Gender as a sociolinguistic variable. In ed. F. Coulmas, 127–150. Oxford: Blackwell.

Wodak, R., and P. Chilton. 2007. Preface. In A new research agenda in (critical) discourse analysis: Theory and interdisciplinarity, ed. P. Chilton and R. Wodak, xi–sviii. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Wodak, R., and R. de Cillia. 1988. Sprache und Antisemitismus. Special issue, Institut für Wissenschaft und Kunst. Mitteilungen 4.

Wodak, R., and R. de Cillia. 2006. Politics and language: Overview. In Encyclopedia of language and linguistics . Vol. 9, 2nd ed., ed. K. Brown. Oxford: Elsevier.

Wodak, R., and M. Krzyzanowski, eds. 2008. Qualitative discourse analysis in the social sciences . Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

Wodak, R., and M. Meyer, eds. 2001. Methods of critical discourse analysis . 1st ed. London: Sage.

Wodak, R., and M. Meyer, eds. 2009a. Methods of critical discourse analysis . 2nd ed. London: Sage.

Wodak, R., and M. Meyer. 2009b. Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory and methodology. In Methods of critical discourse analysis . 2nd ed., ed. R. Wodak and M. Meyer, 1–33. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Wodak, R., and M. Reisigl. 2001. Discourse and racism. In The handbook of discourse analysis, ed. D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, and H. Hamilton. Malden: Blackwell.

Wodak, R., and P. van de Craen. 1987. Neurotic and psychotic language behavior . London: Multilingual Matters.

Wodak, R., and T. A. van Dijk, eds. 2000. Racism at the top . Klagenfurt: Drava.

Wodak, R., S. Moosmüller, U. Doleschal, and G. Feistriter. 1987. Sprachliche Gleichbehandlung von Mann und Frau . Vienna: Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales.

Wodak, R., R. de Cillia, K. Blüml, and E. Andraschko. 1989. Sprache und Macht — Sprache und Politik . Vienna: Bundesverlag.

Wodak, R., J. Pelikan, P. Nowak, H. Gruber, R. de Cillia, and R. Mitten. 1990. Wir sind alle unschuldige Täter! Diskurshistorische Studien zum Nachkriegsantisemitismus . Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

Wodak, R., et al. 1992. Schulpartnerschaft — Kommunikation in der Schule. Vienna: Institut fur Sprachwissenschaft (Project report [et al. in bib.]).

Wodak, R., R. de Cillia, M. Reisigl, and K. Liebhart. 1999. The discursive construction of national identity . Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Zhang, H., C. Paul, H. Yadan, and J. Ewn. 2011. Critique across cultures: Some questions for CDA. Critical Discourse Studies 8 (2): 95–107.

Zienkowski, J. 2011. Discursive pragmatics: A platform for the pragmatic study of discourse. In Discursive pragmatics, ed. J. Zienkowski, J. O. Östman, and J. Verschueren. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program in Second Language Acquisition and Teaching, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA

Prof. Linda R. Waugh

Department of Teaching, Learning and Teacher Education, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, USA

Prof. Theresa Catalano

Department of Modern Languages, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA

Prof. Khaled Al Masaeed

Department of English, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA

Tom Hong Do

Department of French and Italian, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA

Dr. Paul G. Renigar

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda R. Waugh .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

University of Messina, Messina, Italy

Alessandro Capone

Dept. of Lang & Communication, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark

Jacob L. Mey

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter.

Waugh, L., Catalano, T., Masaeed, K., Hong Do, T., Renigar, P. (2016). Critical Discourse Analysis: Definition, Approaches, Relation to Pragmatics, Critique, and Trends. In: Capone, A., Mey, J. (eds) Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society. Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12616-6_4

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12616-6_4

Published : 01 August 2015

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-319-12615-9

Online ISBN : 978-3-319-12616-6

eBook Packages : Social Sciences Social Sciences (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

COURSES AND WORKSHOPS

The Center of Discourse Studies receives researchers from around the globe for short-term research visits (typically ranging from a month to a year) as Visiting Scholars (advanced graduate students) and Visiting Senior Scholars (professors, lecturers etc.).

Throughout the year, the Center of Discourse Studies also sends select invitations to Senior Scholars to give lectures, workshops, and conference talks.  

Invited Professors/ Guest Speakers 2022-2023

Christopher hart , lancaster university daniel n. silva , universidade federal de santa  catarina  daniele de oliveira , universidade federal da bahia  esther pascual , shanghai international studies university liliana vargas monroy , pontificia universidad javeriana  paolo gerbaudo , king’s college london sandra soler,  universidad distrital francisco josé de caldas susana martínez guillem , university of new mexico viviane resende , universidade de brasília , invited professors/ guest speakers 2020-2021, carmen aguilera-carnerero , universidad de granada chrysi rapanta , universidade nova de lisboa cinzia padovani , southern illinois university carbondale douglas mcleod , university of wisconsin–madison fabrizio macagno , universidade nova de lisboa johannes angermuller , open university  john e. richardson , university of the sunshine coast luisa martín rojo , universidad autonoma de madrid miguel urbán , diputado al parlamento europeo ruth wodak , lancaster university/university vienna xavier giró martí , universitat autònoma de barcelona, invited professors/ guest speakers 2019 - 2020, eleonora esposito , universidad de navarra lluís payrató giménez , universitat de barcelona natalia fernández , universitat autò noma de barcelona viviane resende , universidade de brasilia xavier giró martí , universitat autònoma de barcelona, invited professors/ guest speakers 2018-2019, ester jordana lluch , universitat autònoma de barcelona inma pastor gosálbez , universitat rovira i virgili juan david gómez quintero , universidad de zaragoza  maria eugenia piola , universitat de barcelona  martín correa-urquiza , universitat rovira i virgili theo van leeuwen , university of technology sydney  viviane resende , universidade de brasilia, visiting scholars winter-spring semester 2024, pedro eduardo ribeiro universidade de minho (portugal).

Pedro Eduardo Ribeiro is a PhD student in Communication Sciences at the University of Minho, in Portugal, and PhD fellow at the Communication and Society Research Centre, with an undergraduate and a master’s degrees in the same field. His PhD thesis is entitled by Meanings and discourses on the Portuguese’s lifestyle press: Objectification and intersectionalities on the Women’s Health and Men’s Health magazines. Parallelly, he has published works related to newsmagazines, journalism and social media platforms, internal communication, or health communication. As part of his trajectory, he has presented in several conferences and congresses, within the national and international scopes. He spent two months at Örebro Universitet, Sweden, from November to December 2023 to deepen his knowledge in Multimodality and Social Semiotics. He is currently doing a research stay at the Centre of Discourse Studies (January to April 2023) to develop his thesis from a critical discourse analysis approach.  

Last published work: https://doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS17420232288

Baal Delupi Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (Argentina)

Baal Delupi holds a PhD in Semiotics from the Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (UNC), a graduate of the Program for Actualization in Artistic Practices and Politics in Latin America from the Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA) and a Bachelor's Degree in Social Communication from the Universidad Católica de Santiago del Estero (UCSL). He is a Postdoctoral Researcher at the Università di Torino, Italy (FACETS_ERC Project, European Union), and holds a Postdoctorate in Social and Human Sciences from the Center for Advanced Studies of the UNC. He has taught at the Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (UNC), the Universidad Nacional de La Pampa (UNLPam), the Colegio Universitario de Periodismo (CUP), the Universidad de Cádiz (Spain) and the Universidad de Murcia (Spain). He is part of the research program "Social Discourse. The visible and the enunciable" of the CEA-UNC and the team "Languages in movement" based at the Universidad de Cádiz. His area of expertise is the relationship between intellectual production and artistic production.

He is currently carrying out a research stay at the Centre of Discourse Studies with the aim of deepening his postdoctoral work on the analysis of intellectual discourses in Latin America.

For more information go to: https://cordoba.academia.edu/BaalDelupi

Visiting Scholars Winter- Spring Semester 2023

Johanna rodríguez lópez universidad de costa rica (ucr) .

Johanna Rodríguez López is a researcher of the Freedom of Expression and Right to Information Program (PROLEDI) and the Center for Communication Research (CICOM) at the University of Costa Rica (UCR); she is also coordinator of the Teaching Extension Project: Promotion of Communicative Rights at the School of Collective Communication Sciences and professor at the School of Sociology of the same University. She is a PhD Candidate in the Doctoral Program in Education at the University of Costa Rica. She holds a Master's degree in Media Management with emphasis in Information and Communication Technologies from the Universidad de Estatal a Distancia (UNED) and a Bachelor's degree in Sociology from the Universidad de Costa Rica (UCR).

She is developing her research stay at the Centre of Discourse Studies with the purpose of deepening and developing the discourse analysis of the narratives on communicative citizenship of the University Feminist Collective "Me pasó en la UCR" (doctoral thesis).

Anna Kotvalová Charles University (Prague)

Anna Kotvalová is a Ph.D. candidate at the Faculty of Social Sciences (Charles University in Prague) at the Department of International Relations.  Her dissertation research is centred around the poststructural feminist perspective on the discursive processes constructing US national identity. Specifically, her dissertation is titled American Masculine Heterosexual White Identity in the Era of Donald Trump and Beyond: Linear Normalization . Recently, her focus also shifted towards the role of emotions in the world of politics and security and its connection to the construction of the feminine and the masculine, the private and the public.

She also teaches several classes at the Department of International Relations ranging from Introduction to International Relations to Social Justice in IR. Apart from her Ph.D. she writes for a few feminist magazines, publishes poetry, and works on other connected projects.

Esther Pascual Shanghai International Studies University

Esther Pascual (PhD VU Amsterdam, 2003) is currently an Associate Professor at the Institute of Linguistics of Shanghai International Studies University, China. Pascual is Co-Editor-In-Chief of the international peer-reviewed journals Language Under Discussion and International Journal of Language and Culture, and has served as President of the International Association for Cognitive Semiotics. She works on the relation between language, interaction and cognition, as in her 2014 monograph Fictive Interaction and her 2016 co-edited volume The Conversation Frame (both published by John Benjamins).

She has studied the strategic use of interactional structures in ancient texts from an oral tradition (from the Bible to a Chinese Daoist text) as well as in professional communication (marketing, political satire, legal argumentation) and in language pathology (aphasia, autism). More information on Pascual’s work can be found at:  http://estherpascual.com/ .

Mauricio Esteban Alarcón Silva Universidad de La Frontera-Universidad Austral de Chile

Mauricio Esteban Alarcón Silva is a PhD Candidate in Communication (Universidad de La Frontera-Universidad Austral de Chile), ANID Fellow (National Agency for Research and Development). Sociologist and Master in Local and Regional Human Development from Universidad de la Frontera, Chile.  His doctoral research addresses the discursive strategies present in the construction of multimodal texts used in social networks to call for protest days in the framework of the Social Movement in Chile (2019-2020). Mauricio completed a doctoral stay at Pompeu Fabra University and Autonomous University of Barcelona in 2020, participating that same year in the Advanced Seminar of Discourse Studies (SAED), a study group with doctoral students from countries in Europe, Asia and Latin America. 

He is currently carrying out a research stay at the Centre of Discourse Studies, under the guidance of Professor Teun van Dijk, and he also participates in the research group Discourse and Social Protest at the Centre of Discourse Studies.

Visiting Scholars Fall Trimester 2022

Daniel n. silva universidade federal de santa catarina.

Daniel N. Silva is Associate Professor of Pragmatics, Sociolinguistics and Applied Linguistics at the Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brazil. He also collaborates in the Graduate Program in Applied Linguistics at the Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. He does fieldwork in the Complexo do Alemão favelas in Rio de Janeiro. Together with Jerry Lee, he is working on a book named Language as hope, focusing on the Black activism he follows in the field.

Daniele de Oliveira Universidade Federal da Bahia

Daniele de Oliveira is a professor at the Language Institute at the Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA) and in the Postgraduate Program in Language and Culture (PPGLinC), also at UFBA. She has completed post-doctoral studies in the Graduate Program in Languages (PPGCEL) at the Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia (UESB), in the Graduate Program in Linguistics (PPGL) at the Universidade de Brasília (UnB), and at the Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF). She holds a PhD in Linguistic Studies from the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) and a Master's degree in Portuguese Language from the Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais  (PUC-Minas). She is the leader of the research group Margens e Entrelinhas (CNPq/UFBA). She is a member of the Latin American Association of Discourse Studies (ALED).

Currently, she investigates media discourse, focusing on the representation of race relations and racism in this discourse, with Critical Discourse Studies as theoretical basis.  

During her stay at the Centre of Discourse Studies (September-November 2022), she worked on the development of the project: Whiteness and racist discourse in comments to the digital news site Folha de SP.

Mária Hodorovská  Comenius University

Mária Hodorovská is a PhD Candidate at the Institute of European Studies and International Relations at the Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences (Comenius University in Bratislava). By applying critical theoretical frameworks (postcolonialism, post-development theory and political ecology) and the methodological approach of Critical Discourse Analysis, she studies discourses of global education produced by third-sector actors in Slovakia. 

During her research stay at the Centre of Discourse Studies she deepens her knowledge about the method of CDA, attends courses and workshops, and consults her investigation with prof. Teun van Dijk. 

Sandra Soler Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas

Sandra Soler, PhD in Linguistics and Communication from the Universitat de Barcelona, is a research professor at the Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas and co-director of the inter-institutional research group Discourse Studies. Her research interests focus on discourse analysis, sociolinguistics, and critical discourse analysis, and on topics such as gender, discrimination and racism. Some of her publications include Discurso y género en historias de vida (2004), "Racismo discursivo de élite en los textos escolaresciencias sociales" (2006) and "Racismo y discurso en Colombia: cinco siglosinvisibilidad y exclusión" (2007).  Her current research is focused on narratives of resistance and racism in Colombia.

Liliana Vargas Monroy  Pontificia Universidad Javeriana 

Liliana Vargas Monroy is a full professor at the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana de Bogotá, where she has been a professor in the faculties of psychology (1997 - 2014) and social sciences (2014 - 2022) and director of the department and master's degree in cultural studies (2014 - 2021). She holds a PhD in social psychology from the Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona and is a psychologist with a master's degree in philosophy from the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana in Bogotá. Her main areas of work are located within critical labor studies, the modernity/coloniality/decoloniality discussion, discourse studies and feminist epistemology. She has been visiting professor at the University of Granada - Spain, the Autonomous University of Barcelona - Spain and in Colombia at the Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana of Medellin, the Universidad del Magdalena and the Universidad del Valle.

She is currently working on the issues of whiteness and representation of women in Colombia. During her stay at the Center she works from the ACD addressing the ways of representing women in the written media in Colombia during the 1920s.

Viviane Resende Universidade de Brasília 

Viviane Resende, PhD in Linguistics (Language and Society) from the University of Brasília (UnB), is associate professor at the Department of Linguistics, Portuguese and Classical Languages (LIP/UnB). She is a researcher at the Post-Graduate Program in Linguistics (PPGL/UnB), and works as an advisor in the area of Language and Society, specifically in Critical Discourse Studies. Coordinator of the Laboratory for Critical Discourse Studies (LabEC/UnB). President of the Latin American Association of Discourse Studies (2021-2023). In other scientific associations, she was a member of the Board of Directors of the international association Estudos de Discurso e Sociedad (EDiSo) and Secretary of the Executive Council of Research Committee 25 (RC25 - Language and Society) of the International Sociological Association (ISA). She is a member of the Red Latinoamericana de Analisis Critico del Discurso y Pobreza (REDLAD). She has published articles in several journals and several books in the area of critical discourse studies. She is the editor of Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios del Discurso (together with Teresa Oteiza, from PUC-Chile) and editor for Brazil and Portugal of the journal Discourse & Sociedad. She has conducted postdoctoral studies with Poslin/UFMG (2016) and at the Universidad Pompeu Fabra, Spain (2018). 

Susana Martínez Guillem University of New Mexico

Susana Martínez Guillem is Associate Professor in the department of Communication at the University of New Mexico, USA, and affiliate faculty with the Latin American and Iberian Institute, also at UNM. She currently serves on the executive board of EDiSO (Association of Studies in Discourse and Society ( https://edisoportal.org/ ).

In her research, she draws on discourse studies and cultural studies to study the ideological dimensions of institutional, mediated, and everyday practices in relation to immigration, place, space, social movements, (anti)racism, multilingualism, and their connection to material conditions.

Visiting Scholars 2021-2022

João raphael da silva ulster university.

João Raphael da Silva is an Afro-Brazilian Ph.D. Researcher at Ulster University’s School of Applied Social and Policy Sciences (Belfast, Northern Ireland/U.K.). He currently researches how American Congresswomen/Congressmen and British Members of Parliament have been labeling Radical Environmentalist and Animal Rights (REAR) groups, such as the Animal Liberation Front (ALF), Earth First! (EF!), Earth Liberation Front (ELF) and Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (SHAC). As a Visiting Scholar at the Centre of Discourse Studies (Barcelona, Spain), da Silva conducted a Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) of U.S. Congress’ and U.K. Parliament’s debates about these groups.

Currently, da Silva works as a Teaching Assistant at Ulster University’s School of Applied Social and Policy Sciences (Belfast, Northern Ireland/U.K.) and Visiting Lecturer at the University of Roehampton’s School of Humanities and Social Sciences (London, England/U.K.).  

Yanina Kowszyk University of Groningen / Universitat de Barcelona  

Yanina Kowszyk recently obtained her Ph.D. from the Faculty of Spatial Sciences (University of Groningen) and at the Business School (Universitat de Barcelona) in the framework of a co-tutelle agreement. She focuses her research on sustainable challenges that Latin American extractive corporations are facing due to cultural changes. More specifically, she is engaged in the study of the extractive responses to a global and local claim for a more evidence based, climate friendly, culturally grounded and socio-ecological decision-making in regards to their operations in the territories. Her dissertation research addresses the Critical Discourse Analysis to describe the relation between power and discourse. 

During her research visit at the Centre of Discourse Studies, she aims to develop her work on the analysis of constitutional reform debates in Chile in order to understand its influence in local mining conflicts between mining companies and agricultural communities.

Kristián Földes Charles University

Kristián Földes is a Ph.D. candidate at the Faculty of Social Sciences (Charles University in Prague) focusing his research on European integration in the context of the 2015 refugee crisis. More specifically, he is engaged in the study of the political responses of the Visegrad Group to the crisis, the reasons and justifications of the governmental actions. His main interests include discourse and discursive constructions of state identities at the level of political elites. His research thesis draws on Critical Discourse Analysis and the synthesis of symbolic interactionism and poststructuralism as theories of international relations.

During his research visit at the Center of Discourse Studies, he aims to develop his work on the analysis of parliamentary debates in the Czech republic and Slovak republic in order to understand the complex identity construction of political elites and how these constructions may explain their action.

Ahmed Najm Abed  Universitat Politècnica de València  

Ahmed Najm Abed is currently a PhD student in the department of applied linguistics at the Universitat Politècnica de València. His research interests are centered in linguistics, and specifically in critical discourse analysis, discourse studies, refugees media discourse, and multimodality. His research thesis is located mainly in the paradigms of Critical Discourse Analysis, framing, and multimodality, exploring the ways in which the British online media represent Iraqi refugees. 

At the Center of Discourse Studies, he is planning to develop a part of his research thesis which engages methods of multimodal analysis in order to understand the complexity of text and visual images in meaning-making processes.     

Ignacio Riffo-Pavón Universidad Central de Chile

Ignacio Riffo-Pavón holds a PhD in Communication Sciences and a Master's degree in Media, Communication and Culture from the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. He is a postdoctoral researcher of FONDECYT n° 3210195 at the Faculty of Government, Economics and Communications of the Universidad Central de Chile and is a visiting researcher at the Faculty of Communication of the Universitat Pompeu Fabra (academic year 2021). He is also coordinator of the Ibero-American Research Network on Imaginaries and Social Representations (RIIR). His lines of research focus on the study of political discourses, media culture and anthropology of communication. He is the author of book chapters and a series of articles, his latest publication is titled "El imaginario: revisitando la obra de Gilbert Durand" (2019) en la Revista Interdisciplinaria Imagonautas." 

Ignacio is carrying out a post-doctoral stay at the Centre of Discourse Studies from September to December 2021, to develop his work on Imaginaries and Social Representations from a discourse perspective. 

Sara Camacho Estrada Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

Sara Camacho Estrada is a full professor at the Universidad Técnica de Ambato in Ecuador. She is currently pursuing a PhD in Philosophy and Language Sciences at the Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. She holds a PhD in Jurisprudence and Social Sciences and a Master's degree in Applied English Linguistics. The combination of these degrees have awakened her interest in discourse analysis in four areas: political discourse analysis, forensic discourse analysis, educational discourse analysis, and cultural discourse analysis of myths and beliefs of indigenous peoples. 

During her stay at the Centre of Discourse Studies (October-November 2021) she will work on the analysis of metaphors in the political discourse of Andean countries' leaders and on the systematization of this analysis for publication. 

Visiting Scholars 2019-2020

Viviane resende universidade de brasília  cds visiting senior scholar  .

Viviane Resende is a professor at the University of Brasilia (UnB), deputy director of the Center for Advanced Multidisciplinary Studies (CEAM) and coordinator of the Center for Language and Society Studies (NELiS) at UnB. CNPq Researcher. Co-editor of Discourse & Society magazines and Latin American Discourse Studies Magazine. Delegate of the Latin American Discourse Studies Association in Brazil (ALED-Brazil), Board Secretary ISA RC25 (Language and Society) and Voting Board Member of the Association of Discourse and Society Studies (EDiSo).

From February to March 2020, she visited the Center as part of her postdoctoral research, supervised by Teun A. van Dijk and supported by CAPES.

Mauricio Esteban Alarcón Silva 

Universidad de la frontera - universidad austral de chile , cds visiting scholar  .

Mauricio Esteban Alarcón Silva is a PhD student in Communication (Universidad de La Frontera-Universidad Austral de Chile) and Fellow of ANID (National Agency for Research and Development). He holds a bachelor's in Sociology and master's in Local and Regional Human Development from the Universidad de la Frontera, where he is currently a visiting professor.  His doctoral research is entitled: Discursive strategies in the construction of texts announcing  protest gatherings disseminated on social networks. Social movement in Chile (2019-2020).

Mauricio completed a doctoral stay at the Center of Discourse Studies in Barcelona in the Spring Semester 2020, where he ​​participated in the Advanced Seminar of Discourse Studies (SAED), study groups with PhD students from various countries in Europe, Asia and Latin America, and tutorials with Professor Teun van Dijk which allowed him to deepen his theoretical knowledge and methodological strategies through a Critical Discourse Studies approach and define his dissertation work.

Carolina Godoy Berthet 

Universidad autónoma de chile - universidad de la frontera.

Carolina Godoy Berthet is a PhD Candidate in Social Sciences the Universidad de la Frontera (Chile), where she also studied a bachelor's degree in Sociology and a master's in Local Human Development. She is a professor at the Autonomous University of Chile and the Universidad de la Frontera and is currently in her last year of her PhD program, developing the dissertation entitled: The role of food and notions of the body in the identity discourse of women .

From January to June 2020, Carolina participated in the Advanced Discourse Studies Seminar (SAED) at the Center of Discourse Studies, which allowed her to collaborate and establish  networks with PhD students from different countries, expand her theoretical and methodological knowledge in discourse analysis, present her dissertation work, participate in thematic study groups, and receive tutorials from Professor Teun van Dijk, an experience  which has crucially influenced the analytical design of her dissertation.

Carola Gómez Medina

Universidad de los andes , cds visiting scholar  .

Carola Gómez Medina is a Sociologist from the Universidad Nacional de Colombia. She has a master's degree in Cultural and Language Studies, and is currently a PhD Candidate in the Department of Education at the Universidad de los Andes where she investigates curricular reforms in higher education from an articulated perspective between the curriculum, the organization, and change as social phenomena. Carola has researched and worked on issues of gender, emotions, peace-building and education. She was a visiting scholar at the Center of Discourse Studies between January and May 2020 as part of her doctoral studies, an experience which she used to delevop her analysis of ideologies in changing social systems.

María Luisa Guerrero Díaz

Universidad de santiago de chile.

María Luisa Guerrero Díaz is a Spanish professor at the Universidad de Santiago (Chile) with a master's in Education. She is a researcher at the Metropolitan University of Educational Sciences and a PhD candidate in the Translation and Language Sciences program at the Universitat Pompeu Fabra. Her dissertation studies teachers' narratives on migration in Chilean schools. As a Visiting Scholar at the Center of Discourse Studies María Luisa participated in various workshops and was a member of the 2020 Advanced Seminar of Discourse Studies (SAED). 

Mariana Morales da Silva

Universidade federal de são carlos .

Mariana Morales da Silva is a PhD student of Linguistics at the Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar) with research funding from Capes-Brasil. She holds an undergraduate degree in pedagogy and a master's in Education from the Universidade de São Paulo (Brazil). Her  interest in Discourse Studies began in her early years of undergraduate research on Discourse and Education.  She currently researches the discourse of the Brazilian Secondary Student Social Movement through their official on the Facebook digital social network dedicated to the occupations of the social movement between 2015 and 2016. Her research places contributions of Social Movement Studies (particularly those with Latin-American decolonial perspective) in dialogue with (Digital) Discourse Studies with emphasis in the web 2.0.

  She was granted a research stay at the Center of Discourse Studies and at the Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF-Barcelona) under the supervision of Prof. Teun Van Dijk from December 2019 until October 2020, with research funding research from Capes-PrInt (Brasil).

Visiting Scholars/Senior Scholars 2018-2019

From August 2018 to February 2019, she visited the Center as part of her postdoctoral research, where she developed the research project “Representation of public policies for homeless people as territory management: spatial metaphors in Folha de S. Paulo ”, supervised by Teun A. van Dijk and supported by CAPES.

Isabela Correia Universidade Feberal da Bahia  CDS Visiting Scholar

Isabela Santos Correia Rosa is a doctoral student in the postgraduate program in Teaching, Philosophy, and History of Sciences at the Federal University of Bahia (FUBA) / Brazil, where she develops the project entitled “Dialogue between epistemological pluralism and critical multiculturalism in initial formation Biology teachers”. She participated in the Center of Discourse Studies during her exchange period, from November / 2018 to April / 2019, developing a sociocognitive analysis of discourse interactions of teachers of Biology in initial formation at the Federal University of Sergipe / Brazil. In parallel to this analysis, she produced the article “Classroom Discursive Interactions: positions of undergraduate students in Biology on the policy of racial quotas in Brazilian higher education”, in partnership with Professor Rosiléia Oliveira de Almeida (FUBA) and oriented by Professor Teun Van Dijk. The article was accepted by Discurso & Sociedad magazine and should be published in the first edition of 2020.

Veronica Fox Universidade Católica de Pernambuco  CDS Visiting Scholar

Veronica del Pilar Proaño de Fox is a journalist and PhD student of the Postgraduate Program in Language Sciences (PPGCL), of the Catholic University of Pernambuco, in Recife (Brazil), where she investigates the representation of artisanal fishermen in the Pernambucan mass press. Between October 2018 and May 2019, she completed a predoctoral visiting researcher stay at the Pompeu Fabra University and the Centre of Discourse Studies, with the guidance of Prof. Teun Van Dijk and a scholarship from the "Sanduich" PhD Program Abroad (PDSE) of the CAPES - Coordination of Improvement of Higher Level Personnel. During that period, she participated in activities promoted at the Centre for Discourse Studies, such as courses, seminars, conferences, lectures, meetings, and orientations, with the aim of perfecting her research that emphasizes the theoretical-methodological relationships between Critical Discourse Studies (CDS) and traditional cultures in Brazil and Latin America.

Christiane Goßen University of Duisburg-Essen  CDS Scholar

Christiane Goßen holds an MPhil degree in Latin American Studies from the University of Cambridge (UK) and is currently pursuing a PhD at the University of Duisburg-Essen (Germany). Her areas of research are social and cultural anthropology in Latin America and her dissertation focuses on narco rap, a musical youth discourse that has been appropriated as a propaganda tool by drug cartels during the Mexican drug war. She was a visiting scholar at the Centre of Discourse Studies from April to July 2019. During her stay at the Centre she participated in workshops, received tutorials, and exchanged ideas with other PhD candidates in order to fortify her research. 

Visiting Scholars 2017-2018

Bruna Anhaia (Brazil)

Emine Sule Erturk (Turkey)

Jo Angouri (UK)

Jorge González Gutiérrez (Mexico)

Julia Williams (Spain)

Oscar Alberto Morales (Venezuela)

Teun van Dijk

The centre's team , saed members.

Curriculum Vitae

Teun a. van dijk, short bibliographical note.

Teun A. van Dijk is Founding Director of the Centre of Discourse Studies , Barcelona, since 2017. He was professor of Discourse Studies at the University of Amsterdam until 2004, and at Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, until 2014.    

After earlier work on generative poetics, text grammar, and the psychology of text processing, his work since 1980 takes a more critical perspective and deals with discursive racism, news in the press, ideology, knowledge and context. He is the author of many articles and several books in most of these areas.  

He founded six international journals, Poetics, Text (now Text & Talk), the internet journal in Spanish Discurso & Sociedad (www.dissoc.org), Discourse & Society, Discourse Studies, and Discourse & Communication, of which he still edits the latter three. 

His last monographs in English are Ideology (1998), Racism and discourse in Spain and Latin America (2005), Discourse and Power (2008), Discourse and Context (2008), Society and Discourse (2009), Discourse and Knowledge (2014), Antiracist Discourse in Brazil (2020) and Antiracist Discourse (2021), many of which have been translated into Spanish and some in Portuguese.  

He edited The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (4 vols, 1985), the introductory book Discourse Studies (2nd edition, 2011) the reader The Study of Discourse (5 vols., 2007), Racism at the Top (2000)(with Ruth Wodak).  

Teun A. van Dijk holds three honorary doctorates, lectured widely in many countries, especially also in Latin America. With Adriana Bolivar he founded the Asociación Latinoamericana de Estudios del Discurso (ALED), in 1995.  

May 7, 1943, Naaldwijk, the Netherlands

Academic Studies

French Language and Literature. Free University of Amsterdam, 1962-1967. Degree (“drs”)   equivalent to MA.

Université de Strasbourg,  Visiting student.  

  Theory of Literature: University of Amsterdam, 1967-1968. Degree equivalent to MA  

École Pratiques des Hautes Études , Paris, 1969. Visiting student.  

PhD University of Amsterdam PhD Thesis: Some aspects of text grammars. The Hague: Mouton, 1972

Postdoctoral studies: University of California, Berkeley, 1973.  

Academic Positions

Lecturer Literary Studies, University of Amsterdam, 1968-1980  

Professor of Discourse Studies (personal chair) University of Amsterdam, 1980-2004  

Visiting Professor University of Bielefeld, Germany, 1973

Visiting Professor Universidad de Campinas, Brazil, 1992  

Visiting Professor Universitat Pompeu Fabra, IULA, 1999-2000  

Profesor Extraordinario Universidad Católica de Valparaiso.

Researcher ( Ramón y Cajal ) Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Dept. de Traducció i Ciències del Llenguatge 2001-2006 (Until November 15, 2006)

Visiting Professor Institute of Social and Political Studies (IESP, UERJ) Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (2016).  

Visiting Professor ( Catedrático ) Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Dept. de Traducció i Ciències del Llenguatge, 2000

Founding Director Centre of Discourse Studies, Barcelona, 2017  

Doctor honoris causa

Universidad de   Buenos Aires, Tucumán (Argentina)

Universidad de Mendoza (Argentina)

Publications

(books only), books/monographs.

1971. Moderne literatuurtheorie. Een experimentele inleiding. (Modern theory of literature. An experimental introduction). Amsterdam: van Gennep, 1971.

1971 . Taal. Tekst. Teken. Bijdragen tot de literatuurtheorie . (Language. Text. Sign. Contributions to the theory of literature). Amsterdam: Atheneum, Polak & van Gennep, 1971. (This book won the Essay Award of the City of Amsterdam).

1972. Beiträge zur generativen Poetik . München: Bayerischer Schulbuch Verlag, 1972. • I talian translation: Per una poetica generativa . Bologna: Il Mulino, 1976.

1972. Some aspects of text grammars. A Study in theoretical poetics and linguistics. (PhD Thesis). The Hague: Mouton, 1972.

1977. Text and context. Explorations in the semantics and pragmatics of discourse . London: Longman. • Spanish translation: Texto y contexto . Madrid: Catedra, 1980. • Italian translation: Testo e contesto . Bologna: Il Mulino, 1981.

1977. Het literatuuronderwijs op school. Een kritische analyse . (Teaching literature at school. A critical analysis). Amsterdam: Van Gennep.

1978. Taal en handelen. Een interdisciplinaire inleiding . (Language and action. An interdisciplinary introduction). Muiderberg: Coutinho.

1978. Tekstwetenschap. Een interdisciplinaire inleiding . (Discourse studies. An interdisciplinary introduction). Utrecht: Het Spectrum. • German translation: Textwissenschaft . Tuebingen: Niemeyer, 1980. • Spanish translation: La ciencia del texto . Barcelona/Buenos Aires: Paidos, 1983.

1978. The structures and functions of discourse. An interdisciplinary introduction to textlinguistics and discourse studies . Text of lectures given at the University of Puerto Rico at Rio Piedras. University of Amsterdam, Unpublished ms. • Spanish translation: Las estructuras y funciones del discurso . Mexico: Siglo XXI, 1981. (7a edición 1993).(14a edición actualizada, 2005)

Macrostructures. An interdisciplinary study of global structures in discourse, interaction, and cognition . Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

1981. Studies in the pragmatics of discourse . The Hague/Berlin: Mouton.

1983. Minderheden in de media . (Minorities in the media). Amsterdam: SUA.

1984. Prejudice in discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

1984. Structures of international news . Report to UNESCO. University of Amsterdam, Dept. of General Literary Studies, Section of Discourse Studies.

1987. Communicating Racism. Ethnic Prejudice in Thought and Talk. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

1988 . News as Discourse . Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. • Spanish translation, La noticia como discurso. Comprensión, estructura y producción de la información. Barcelona, Paidos, 1990.

1988. News Analysis. Case studies of international and national news in the press . Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

1987. Schoolvoorbeelden van racisme. De reproduktie van racisme in maatschappijleerboeken (Textbook examples of racism. The reproduction of racism in social science textbooks). Amsterdam: Socialistische Uitgeverij Amsterdam.

1989. Jazyk, poznanie, kommunikatsia (Language, Cognition and Communication). Moscow: Progress, (Collection of articles, translated from English).

1991. Racism and the Press. London: Routledge.

1992. Discurso, cognicão, interacão . (Discourse, Cognition, Interaction). São Paulo: Contexto. (Collection of articles translated from English).

1993. Elite discourse and racism. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE. • Spanish version, Racismo y discurso de las élites. Barcelona: Gedisa, 2003. • Chinese translation, Renmin University Press, 2010.

1993. (Society, cognition and discourse: In Chinese, collection of articles translated from English). Beijing: China Book Company.

Il discurso razzista. La riproduzione del pregiudizio nei discorso quotidiani. Presentazione di Laura Balbo. Messina (Italy): Rubbettino.

1994. Discurso, poder y cognición social. Conferencias de Teun A. van Dijk . Special issue of Cuadernos Maestría en Lingüística (Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia), 2(2), 1994.

1995. Prensa, racismo y poder . México: Universidad IberoAmericana, 1995.

1996. Discourse, racism and ideology. La Laguna (Spain): RCEI Ediciones.

1997.  Racismo y análisis crítico de los medios. Barcelona: Paidos.

1998. Ideology. London: Sage, 1998. • Spanish translation, Ideología. Barcelona: Gedisa, 1999.

2003. De Rasoel-Komrij affaire. Amsterdam: Critics.

2003.  Ideología y discurso. Una introducción multidisciplinaria. Barcelona: Ariel. • Italian translation, Ideologie. Discorso e costruzione sociale del pregiudizio. A cura di Paola Villano. Roma: Carocci.

2005. Dominación étnica y racismo discursivo en España y América Latina . Barcelona: Gedisa, 2003. • Extended English version: Discourse and racism in Spain and Latin America. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2005.

2005. Discurso, Notícia e Ideologia. Estudos na Análise Crítica do Discurso. Porto: Campo das Letras, 2005. (Collection of articles translated from English).

2008. Discourse and Power. Houndmills: Palgrave, 2008. • Spanish translation, Discurso y Poder (Barcelona, Gedisa, 2009) • Portuguese translation, Discurso e Poder (São Paulo, Contexto, 2008) • Arabic Translation, EL Cairo, 2013. • Russian Translation. Moscow: URSS, 2013.

2008. Discourse and Context. A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. • Portuguese translation, Discurso e contexto (São Paulo, Contexto, 2012) • Spanish translation: Disurso e Contexto (Barcelona, Gedisa, 2012)

2009. Society and Discourse. How social context influences text and talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. • Spanish translation, Sociedad y Discurso. (Barcelona, Gedisa, 2011).

2014. Discourse and Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Spanish Translation (Barcelona: Gedisa, 2016).

Antiracist Discourse. Theory and History of a Macromovement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

2020. Antiracist Discourse in Brazil. From Abolition to Affirmative Action. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield.

Books with other authors

1974. (with J. Ihwe, J.S. Petöfi & H. Rieser) Zur Bestimmung narrativer Strukturen aud der Grundlage von Textgrammatiken. Hamburg: Buske Verlag, 1972. Second edition.

1983. (with Walter Kintsch): Strategies of discourse comprehension . New York: Academic Press, 1983. – This book was awarded the Outstanding Book Award of the American Association of Educational Psychology, AERA, in 1984.

1999. (with Iván Rodrigo M.) Análisis del discurso social y político . Quito (Ecuador): Abya-Yala, 1999.

2022. (with Carmen López and Isolda Carranza (Eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Spanish Language Studies, London: Routledge, 2022.

1994. María Cristina Martínez, Análisis del discurso. Cohesión, coherencias,y estructura semántica de los textos expositivos . Cali (Colombia), Universidad del Valle, Editorial Facultad de Humanidades.  

2003. Lupicinio Íñiguez Rueda (Ed.), Análisis del discurso. Manual para las ciencias sociales. Barcelona: Editorial UOC.

2003. Rosa Artigas, Joan Bellès & Maria Grau, Tipotext. Una tipologñia de textos de no ficció. Barcelona, Direcció General de Política Lingüística. Eumo Editorial.

2004. Sandra Soler Castillo, Discurso y Género en historias de vida. Una investigación de relatos de hombres y mujeres en Bogotá. Bogotá: Caro y Cuervo.

2004.  Anamaría Harvey (comp.), En torno al Discurso. Contribuciones de América Latina. Santiago de Chile: Ediciones de la Universidad Católica de Chile.

2004.  Pascal Marchand (dir.), Psychologie sociale des médias. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.

2006. Adriana Bolivar (Ed.), Análisis del discurso. Por qué y para qué. Caracas: El Nacional.

2007. Helena Calsamiglia & Amparo Tusón, Las cosas del decir . 2a edición. Barcelona: Ariel.

Edited books

1976. Pragmatics of language and literature. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1976.

1977. Grammars and descriptions. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter, 1977. (with Janos S. Petöfi)  

1985. Handbook of Discourse Analysis . 4 vols. I. Disciplines of discourse . II. Dimensions of discourse . III. Discourse and dialogue . IV. Discourse analysis in society. London: Academic Press, 1985.  

1985. Discourse and literature. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 1985.   Spanish version, Discurso y literatura. Nuevos planteamientos sobre el análisis de los géneros literarios. Madrid, Visor, 1999.

1985 . Discourse and communication. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter, 1985.  

1987. Approaches to discourse, poetics and psychiatry . Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1987. (with Iris M. Zavala and Myriam Díaz-Diocaretz)  

1988. Discourse and Discrimination. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press, 1988. (with Geneva Smitherman-Donaldson)  

1997. Discourse Studies. A multidisciplinary introduction. 2 vols. London: Sage, 1997.   Spanish translation, Estudios del discurso. Barcelona/Buenos Aires: Gedisa, 1999-2000.   Polish translation, Dyskurs jako struktura i proces. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 2001.  

2000. Racism at the Top. Parliamentary Discourses on Ethnic Issues in Six European Countries. Klagenfurt: Drava Verlag, 2000. (with Ruth Wodak)  

2004. Communicating Ideologies. Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Language, Discourse and Social Practice. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang, 2004. (with Martin Pütz and JoAnne Neff-van Aertselaer  

2007. Discourse Studies. 5 vols. Sage Benchmark Series. London: Sage, 2007.  

2007. Discursos sobre la inmigración en España. Los medios de comunicación, los parlamentos y las administraciones. Barcelona, Cidob, 2007. ((with Ricard Zapata Barrero)  

2007 . Racismo y Discurso en América Latina. Barcelona: Gedisa, 2007.   Portuguese translation, Contexto, São Paulo, 2008   English translation, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD, 2009  

Books Published / Translated in(to) Spanish

1980. Texto y contexto . Madrid: Catedra

1983. La ciencia del texto . Barcelona/Buenos Aires: Paidos.

1981. Las estructuras y funciones del discurso . Mexico: Siglo XXI. (7a Edicion, 1991).

1990. La noticia como discurso. Comprensión, estructura y producción de la información. Barcelona, Paidos.

1995. Prensa, racismo y poder . Mexico: Universidad IberoAmericana.

1997. Racismo y análisis crítico de los medios. Barcelona: Paidos.

1999. Ideología. Una aproximación multidisciplinaria . Barcelona/Buenos Aires: Gedisa.

2000. (Ed.). Estudios del discurso. 2 vols. Barcelona/Buenos Aires: Gedisa.

1999. De la poética generativa hasta el análisis crítico del discurso. Artículos seleccionados 1976-1998. Amsterdam: Universidad de Amsterdam.

1999. (con Iván Rodrigo M.) Análisis del discurso social y político. Quito, Ecuador: Abya-Yala.

2003. Ideología y discurso. Una introducción multidisciplinaria. Barcelona: Ariel.

2003. Racismo y discurso de las élites. Barcelona: Gedisa.

2003. Dominación Étnica y Racismo Discursivo España y América Latina. Barcelona: Gedisa.

2007. Racismo y Discurso en América Latina. Barcelona: Gedisa.

2008. Discurso y Poder. Barcelona: Gedisa.

2012. Discurso y Contexto. Barcelona: Gedisa.

2011. Sociedad y Discurso. Barcelona: Gedisa.

2017. Discurso y Conocimiento, Barcelona: Gedia.

Invited Lectures

Countries and cities.

Argentina: Buenos Aires, Córdoba, Tucumán, Mendoza.

Australia: Brisbane, Sydney.

Austria: Vienna.

Belgium: Antwerp, Brussel, Ghent, Leuven.

Bolivia: La Paz.

Brasil: Belem, Belo Horizonte, Brasilia, Campinas, Curitiba, Dourados, Florianópolis, Fortaleza, Maceió, Porto Alegre, Recife, Rio de Janeiro, Salvador de Bahia, São Paulo.

Canada: Montreal, Toronto, Victoria.

Chile: Concepción, La Serena, Santiago, Temuco, Valdivia, Valparaiso.

Colombia: Bogotá, Bucaramanga, Cali, Cartagena de Indias, Medellín.

Costa Rica: San José.

Cuba: La Habana.

Czech Republic : Praha.

Denmark: Copenhagen.

Dominican Republic: Santo Domingo.

Ecuador: Guayaquil, Quito.

Egypt: Cairo.

El Salvador: San Salvador.

Finland: Helsinki, Jyväskylä, Tampere, Turku.

France: Aix en Provence, Lyon, Montpellier, Paris, Toulouse.

Germany: Berlin, Bielefeld, Duisburg, Düsseldorf, Karlsruhe, Konstanz, Landau, Münster.

Great Britain: Birmingham, Bristol, Cardiff, Colchester, Lancaster, London, Oxford.

Greece: Athens.

Guatemala: Guatemala City.

Honduras: Tegucigalpa.

Hungary: Budapest.

India: Mysore, Trivandrum.

Indonesia: Jakarta.

Israel: Jerusalem, Tel Aviv.

Italy: Bologna, Cagliari, Ferrara, Firenze, Genova, Palermo, Parma, Rome, Siena, Urbino, Venice.

Japan: Osaka.

Korea: Seoul.

Malaysia: Kuala Lumpur, Penang.

Mexico: Cuernavaca, Jalapa, Mérida, México DF, Monterrey, Oaxaca, Puebla.

Morocco: Rabat.

Netherlands: Amsterdam, Leiden, Nijmegen, Utrecht.

New Zealand: Auckland.

Nicaragua: Managua.

Norway: Bergen, Oslo, Trondheim, Voss.

Palestine: Bir Zeit.

Paraguay: Asunción.

Peru: Lima.

Philippines: Manila.

Poland: Warsaw.

Portugal: Lisboa, Coimbra, Braga.

Puerto Rico: Rio Piedras.

Qatar: Doha.

Romania: Bucharest.

Russia: Belgorod, Moscow, St. Petersburg.

Slovakia: Bratislava.

Spain: A Corunha, Alcoy, Alicante, Almería, Barcelona, Cádiz, Córdoba, Granada, La Laguna, Madrid, Málaga, Murcia, Salamanca, Donostia (San Sebastian), Santiago de Compostela, Sevilla, Valencia, Valladolid.

Sweden: Linköping, Stockholm, Uppsala.

Switzerland: Sion.

Thailand: Bangkok.

Trinidad & Tobago: Port of Spain.

Tunesia: Sfax.

Turkey: Istanbul.

Uruguay: Montevideo.

USA: Ann Arbor, Austin, Berkeley, Boulder, Georgetown, Los Angeles, Madison, Nashville, New York, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, San Diego, Santa Cruz, St. Louis, Syracuse.

Venezuela: Carácas.

Vietnam: Danang.

Founding Editor of:

Poetics. International Journal for the Theory of Literature. The Hague: Mouton, and later Amsterdam: North Holland.

TTT.  Interdisciplinair Tijdschrift voor Taal- en Tekstwetenschap (TTT. Interdisciplinary Journal for Linguistics and Discourse Studies). Deventer: Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema, and Dordrecht: Foris. 1981-1986.

TEXT. An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse. Amsterdam/Berlin: Mouton, 1981-1997.

Discourse and Society . International Journal for the study of discourse and communication in their social, cultural and political contexts . London: Sage Publications, 1990.

Discourse Studies. Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Text and Talk. London, Sage, 1999.

Discurso & Sociedad. Revista Multidisciplinaria de internet. 2005.

Discourse & Communication. London: Sage. 2007.

Board member of the following journals

1. Critical Discourse Studies  

2. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies  

3. Estudios Ingleses (Spain)  

4. Gragoata (Brasil)  

5. Howard Journal of Communications  

6. Journal of Intercultural Studies  

7. Journal of Language and Politics  

8. Medio & Jornalismo  

9. Mots (France)  

10. Narrative Inquiry  

11. Poetics  

12. Poetics Today  

13. Pragmatics  

14. Qualitative Research in Psychology  

15. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios del Discurso  

16. Revista Signos  

17. Written Communication  

18. Comunicação e Sociedade  

Major Research Projects  

Text Processing (Netherlands Research Council, ZWO),  

Racism and Conversation (Netherlands Research Council, ZWO)

Racism at the Top (with Ruth Wodak) (Austrian Ministry of Education,  

Discourse and Knowledge (Ministry of Education, Spain – Ramón y Cajal)

Discourse and Racism in Latin America (not funded)

Epistemic Strategies in Discourse, Communication and Interaction (Ministy of Education, Spain)  

Doctoral theses supervised  

Doctoral students' supervision.

Toine van Teeffelen (The Netherlands). Discourse and Palestine. University of Amsterdam, 1995.  

Jessika Ter Wal (The Netherlands), Racism in the Italian Press and Politics. Istituto Europeo, Firenze, 1997.  

Shi Xu (China), Cultural representations. Analyzing discourse about the other. Universidad de Amsterdam: Facultad de Humanidades, 1997.  

Ineke Mok (The Netherlands), University of Amsterdam, Faculty of Letters, 1999.  

Esam N. Khalil (Egypt), Grounding in English and Arabic News Discourse. Universidad de Amsterdam. Facultad de Humanidades, 1998.  

Natalia Fernández (Spain), La violencia sexual contra la mujer y su representación en la prensa española. Universitat de Barcelona, Facultat de Filología, 2000.  

Montserrat Ribas (Spain), Discurs parlamentari i representacions socials. Universitat de Barcelona, Facultat de Filología, 2002 (dirigida con Teresa Cabré).  

Zara Simões Pinto Coelho (Portugal), Drogas em Campanhas de Prevenção: dos discursos às Ideologias. Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal, 2003.  

Sandra Soler (Colombia), Discurso y género en historias de vida. UB, June 2003.  

Cristiane Cataldi (Brazil), Divulgación sobre transgénicos en El País. UPF, December 2003.  

Neyla Pardo (Colombia). Representaciones sociales sobre la impunidad en la prensa colombiana. UNED, Madrid. October, 2004.  

Isabel Gómez Díez (Spain), “Je n’ai pas ma bouche”. Prácticas interactivas y discursivas en el procedimiento de solicitud de asilo en Bélgica. Barcelona, UPF, September 2008. (Co-supervised with Josep Castellà)  

Alon Lischinsky (Argentina). The construction of expert knowledge in popular management literature. Barcelona, UPF, noviembre 2008.  

Gema Rubio (Spain). Análisis crítico de los discursos políticos sobre inmigración del partido popular en España. February, 2011.  

Lucas Bietti (Argentina). Memory, Discourse and Interaction: Remembering in Context and History. 20 July, 2011.  

Julia Williams (Spain), Metaphors of cancer in scientific popularisation articles in the English and Spanish Press, UPF, 2013.  

Naomi Shinabe (Japan), «Nosotros» y «los otros» en el discurso sobre Europa y Asia: un estudio comparativo de los libros de texto de España y Japón, UPF 2014.  

César Colorado (Mexico), Prensa y protesta social. La representación del caso atenco en la jornada. UPF, 2014.  

Natalia Biffi (Colombia), Prácticas y Discurso de los Derechos Humanos en Colombia. Análisis de la Correspondencia entre la Red Italiana de Solidaridad y el Gobierno colombiano del 2002 al 2006. UPF, 2016.  

Pamela Murgia (Italy), Hamas’ Statement: A Discourse Analytical Approach, UPF, 2018  

Omar el Hammoud (Marrocco), Al Qaeda en el Magreb. Análisis del discurso terrorista sobre la yihad. UPF, 2018  

Camila Cárdenas Neira (Chile), Discursos de protesta y redes sociales. Análisis de las prácticas discursivas activistas producidas en la comunidad de Facebook Universitario Informado durante las movilizaciones estudiantiles en Chile (2011-2013). UPF, 2018.  

Georgios-Alexandros Polymeneas (Greece), Political Discourse in the times of the European Economic Crisis: Epistemic Stance and Legitimizing Strategies in Greek Political Discourse (2010-2012), UPF, 2018.  

(co-directed with with Micheline Mattedi Tomazi) Raquelli Natale (Brazil), O Femirracídio na Imprensa: Um Estudo Discursivo e Sociocognitivo. Vitória (ES), Brasil, 2019.  

(co-directed with Verena Stolcke), María Eugenia Piola Simioli, Las representaciones de la pobreza y los pobres en la prensa argentina .Análisis de los editoriales de los diarios La Nación y Clarín. Universidad Autonom de Barcelona (UAB), 2020.  

(co-directed with Karl Heinz Efken), Veronica Fox, Poder e Desigualdade: A Representação Dos Pescadores E Pescadoras Artesanais nas Notícias Do Jornal Do Commercio. Recife (Brasil), Universidade Católica De Pernambuco, 2021.  

(co-directed with Maria Aparecida Resende Ottoni). Conceição Maria Alves de Araújo Guisardi, Discurso, Cognição e Sociedade : A Prática Social de Ingresso e De Permanência no Ensino Superior Público por Meio de Cotas Sociais e Raciais. Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, 2022.  

Privacy Overview

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

We can('t) do this A corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis of migration in Germany

2019, Journal of Language and Politics

Migration has been a defining topic in the discourse in Germany since the so-called “refugee crisis” in 2015. This corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis systematically reconstructs the discourse about migration in two influential German newspapers, thereby emphasizing the construction of different subject positions for people migrating to Germany. Mass media are an important arena for the fight for hegemony between discursive coalitions of culturalization regimes that are based on openness and closure respectively. The discursive space of the German discourse about migration offers multiple opportunities in this regard. In the left-leaning taz, we detect a general trend to support an open society although some (but often contested) elements of closure are detected in this medium as well. Die Welt leans much more towards closure and the problematization of migration although it also offers a diverse array of interpellations that depend on the usefulness or threating character of people coming to Germany.

Related Papers

Bastian Vollmer , Serhat Karakayali

The anti-immigration continuum of public attitude-mediapolitics has undergone changes in the course of the “refugee crisis” in Germany. By examining migrant representations and discursive events taking place in 2015 and early 2016, we will show the volatility of the recent discourse on refugees. A historical/critical discourse analysis will show how new topoi arose and old topoi of the security/power paradigm have lastly reconquered the discourse. Using newspaper coverage, we discuss discursive events in three main sections: borders, arrival, and presence. Discursive shifts have taken place that have had an impact on the configuration of migration categories such as migrants or refugees.

J.M. Fuller

This research examines the use of terms for social groups in Germany, specifically Personen mit Migrationshintergrund 'people with migration background', Turken 'Turks', and Biodeutscher 'ethnic German(s)' in online discussions about the integration of immigrants into German society. These terms construct essentialist social categories that focus on ethnic background as inherent in cultural behavior, which makes integration for members of these groups impossible. Further, in some cases naming stigmatized groups is no longer necessary, as the discourses about members of these groups are so strong that the mere mention of particular cultural practices is enough to indicate who the unwanted members of society are. However, competing discourses, which challenge the use of these terms and the discourses of alterity, are also part of the discussion of national belonging exemplified in these data.

10plus1 | Living Linguistics

On the 50th anniversary of the labour recruitment agreement between Germany and Turkey, Turkish migrants in Germany continue to occupy a central position as the objects of the on-going public discussions on immigration and integration. This study explores, with a transnational perspective, how the discourses on migrant integration are formulated in the transnational Turkish language media in Germany, as well as, if and how those discourses differ from, comply with or resist the dominant integrationist discourse in Germany. To reach this aim, discourse analysis on empirical material consisting of 97 articles from the European editions of newspapers Zaman and Hürriyet, has been conducted within the theoretical perspective informed by the ideas of Michel Foucault. The study concludes that there are conflicting and overlapping discourses on integration manifested in the Turkish language media in Germany, which are in varying degrees resisting to and in conformity with the dominant integrationist discourse in Germany. The resistance and compliance occurs in a complex and transnational way, in the reflection of the political and ideological fault lines in Turkey. Keywords: immigration, integration, media, discourse, Turkish, Germany, Zaman ,Hürriyet

EuropeNow Journal

Stefan Wallaschek

The article analyzes the German discourse in regard to solidarity claims in Europe's migration crisis from 2013 to 2015. It especially focuses on party actors and their claims in daily quality newspapers. The discourse structure (actor constellation and concept formation) is computed and visualized by deploying the discourse network analysis.

CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo

ghizlan elalaoui

Migration and Media. Discourses about identities in crisis

Marie Veniard , Melani Schroeter , Charlotte Taylor

This chapter looks into discourses about migration in four European countries through the lens of cultural keywords (cf. Williams 1983; Bennett et al. 2005; Wierzbicka 1997); using Corpus Assisted Discourse Analysis, it compares the use of the keywords multicultural and multiculturalism. The study is based on corpora from British, French, German and Italian newspaper articles covering the time span 1998-2012, collated from one conservative and one left-liberal national newspaper in each language. Across the languages, the results show that the adjective multicultural is mostly descriptive of a state of affairs, typically without negative evaluation, and that the noun multiculturalism is associated with abstract concepts and points to a more negative discourse prosody, indicated by collocates such as ‘failure’.

Proceedings of the 1st International Conference Europe in Discourse: Identity, Diversity, Borders. Athens, September 23-27, 2016. Juliane House & Themis Kaniklidou (eds). Hellenic American University

Aggeliki Sakellariou

The present paper investigates how refugees and immigrants are presented by five Greek newspapers that represent all the ideological positions. Corpus linguistics and critical discourse analysis are combined and data are analyzed both quantitatively and qualitatively. More specifically, the newspapers’ electronic archives are used as corpora, in order to discover how refugees and immigrants are presented and in what context. Additionally, collocations found are cross-checked against general language corpora. Emphasis is laid on whether or not their representation differs significantly from one newspaper to the other. The data collected come from the year 2015, when the continuing war in Syria and the atrocities of ISIS have resulted in the arrival of many refugees and immigrants at the Greek islands of the eastern Aegean Sea. Especially studied are the collocations and the contexts of the texts on the citizenship law voted this year and the words ‘illegal’ and ‘irregular’ that describe their legal status.

Studies in Communication Sciences

While these lines were written, Taliban were conquering Afghanistan, establishing a regime of terror in the country, while concurrently provoking a wide conflict in the Western public sphere about responsibilities and consequences of this situation. More specifically, Europe witnesses a racist and xenophobic wave of discourses against a new possible escape of refugees toward Europe; presently such discourses abound in politics and the media. It is more than a truism nowadays that, in crisis-stricken Europe, there is an increasing politicization of migration, which takes place against the background and mutual overlapping of diverse crises. More specifically, migration has become a focal and quite polarizing issue in the European public sphere especially since the numbers of refugees, escaping from conflict territories of the Middle East (e. g., Syria), crossing the Mediterranean, dramatically increased starting in 2014 (Bevelander & Wodak, 2019a). The so-called “refugee crisis,” as ...

Ivana Cvetkovic , Susana Martínez Guillem

Critical Discourse Studies (CDS) is a transdisciplinary family of theoretical and methodological approaches, focusing on the analysis and critique of discursive practices in relation to broader ideological processes, as well as the material conditions that shape and are shaped by them (see Wodak and Meyer, 2016; Flowerdew and Richardson, 2017). A CDS approach can be seen as an extension of the Critical Linguistics framework (Fowler et al., 1979; Kress and Hodge, 1979) that developed in and out of Western European contexts. The main premise of the analyses developed from this perspective considers language not as a neutral descriptor of reality, but as an important instrument in the structuring of power relations in societies. Consequently, CDS strives to uncover how the legitimation of particular control mechanisms occurs, among others, through specific linguistic practices. In spite of its Western European core, and due to its decidedly problem- oriented nature, as well as the constant refinement and broadening of its analytical tools, CDS has progressively become appealing to the larger European continent, as well as to other Western and non- Western contexts such as the US, Australia, or China (Shi- Xu, 1999; Tracy et al., 2011).

RELATED PAPERS

Anales del Jardín …

Mauricio Velayos

Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa

Patricia Tomei

Klaus Wannmacher

Biologie in unserer Zeit

Sascha Beutel

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Fabio Potenti

Education Policy Analysis Archives

Carlos Hernan Wörner Olavarria (C. H. Wörner)

Jasa potong kambing aqiqah

jasa potong kambing aqiqah

Rafaela Niemann

Abdul Hayyie al Kattani

FAKULTAS ILMU TERAPAN, TEKNIK KOMPUTER

Agung Febrianto

IOP Publishing

Dr.Mahendra U Gaikwad

Revista dos Trabalhos de Iniciação Científica da UNICAMP

Nicolly Rodrigues

Transfusion

Shirley Owusu-Ofori

Informativo Tecnico Do Semiarido

thiago gomes de sousa

Scott Cooper

José Luis Andrade Pineda

Padjadjaran Journal of Dentistry

Tichvy Tammama

Agronomia Colombiana

Jairo Clavijo

René Buchholz

rolando guzman

Berhanu Tamiru

Jurnal Kesehatan Medika Udayana

Eka Suprapti

Henk Schulte Nordholt

Håkan Olsson

See More Documents Like This

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

Unable to find any suggestions for your query...

The Essex website uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are consenting to their use. Please visit our cookie policy to find out which cookies we use and why. View cookie policy.

Centre for Ideology and Discourse Analysis

Part of Department of Government

We offer a distinctive transdisciplinary space within which to engage in the systemic and critical study of ideologies and discourses

The Centre for Ideology and Discourse Analysis (clDA) is committed to the transdisciplinary and systematic study of contemporary ideologies and discourses, and their impact on institutions, movements and policies. Rooted in the work of Ernesto Laclau, who was a founding figure of the Centre, and other members of the Essex School of Discourse  Analysis, we gather together critical scholars who evaluate key problems and promises of the current age, using a wide range of critical and explanatory idioms of analysis. 

The Centre connects research, education and political practice by actively involving its members in research projects, hosting seminars, academic visits and working with other institutions in the UK and Europe.

Its members include staff from other Departments and Centres at the University, our MA and PhD students, as well as numerous PhD students, early career researchers, and established academics who take part in our activities as Visiting PhDs or Fellows of the Centre.

"The problem with 'actually existing' liberal democracies is not with their constitutive values crystallized in the principles of liberty and equality for all, but with the system of power which redefines and limits the operation of those values. This is why our project of 'radical and plural democracy' was conceived as a new stage in the deepening of the 'democratic revolution', as the extension of the democratic struggles for equality and liberty to a wider range of social relations." Ernesto Laclau & Chantal Mouffe

Our research

cIDA builds its intellectual community through regular activities, organised within related clusters:

• poststructuralist, post-Marxist and psychoanalytic theories of ideology and discourse
• democratic theory, governance and critical policy analysis
• research methods in critical political theory
• populism and radical democracy
• democracy, justice and social movements
• mass media, communication and political agency
• critical fantasy studies

cIDA and its members have forged extensive links with other Universities and Centres across the globe that actively draw on the tradition of the ‘Essex School of Discourse Theory’, including the work of the CIDA Directors - Professors Glynos & Howarth - on the ‘Logics Approach’ to critical social and political analysis. Through collaborative projects and visiting professorships they have established links with a wide range of institutions, including Stockholm University, CBS, the State University of Rio de Janeiro and UFPE, Recife, and the University of Bergen.

The directors are also active members of the International Research Network DeSiRe (Democracy, Signification, Resistance) , which is a collaborative relation between academics at Free University, Brussels (lead organization), Essex, Uppsala, and Aristotle University, Thessaloniki.

cIDA initiates and coordinates major events beyond its regular seminar series, including international conferences and workshops, such as:  

• “Logics, Critical Explanation and the Future of Critical Political Theory: Applying Discourse Analysis in Multiple Contexts” (2019)
• “The Politics of Numbers within the New Technologies of Governance” (2019) 
• “Essex Transform: Democracy and Active Citizenship in Academia”(2018)
• “Populism and ‘Constructing a People’” (2017)
• “Austerity, Resistance and Emergent Imaginaries: From Occupied Squares to the Parliament and the Neighbourhood” (2017)

Our upcoming Summer Schools:

1q doing discourse analysis: populism, neoliberalism and radical democratic politics - 10th july 2023 2i applying discourse theory: politics, ideology, populism - 18th august 2023, our previous summer schools:.

Applying Discourse Theory: Politics, Ideology, Populism

Doing Discourse Analysis: Neoliberalism, Populism and Radial Democracy

Published works

• Glynos, J., Howarth, D., Flitcroft, R., Love, C., Roussos, K. and Vazquez, J., (2021).  Logics, discourse theory and methods: Advances, challenges and ways forward . Journal of Language and Politics. 20 (1), 62-78.
• Glynos, J. (2021) Critical Fantasy Studies,  Journal of Language and Politics 20(1): 95-111.
• Bloom, P. and Śliwa, M., (2021).  Hacking work: Critically examining the implications of the new discourse and practices of hacking for work intensification and organisational control. Human Relations, 001872672199676-001872672199676
• Griggs, S., Howarth, D. and Feandeiro, A., (2020).  The Logics and Limits of ‘Collaborative Governance’ in Nantes: Myth, Ideology and the Politics of New Urban Regimes . Journal of Urban Affairs. 42 (1), 91-108.
• Griggs, S. and Howarth, D., (2019).  Discourse, policy and the environment: hegemony, statements and the analysis of UK airport expansion. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. 21 (5), 464-478.
• Barnett, N., Griggs, S. and Howarth, D., (2019).  Whatever happened to Councillors? Problematising the deficiency narrative in English local politics . Political Studies. 67 (3), 775-794.
• Carter, D. and Warren, R., (2019).  Metonyms and metaphor: the rhetorical redescription of public interest for the International Accounting Standards Board. Critical Policy Studies. 13 (3), 280-305.
• Howarth, D., (2018).  Marx, discourse theory and political analysis: negotiating an ambiguous legacy . Critical Discourse Studies. 15 (4), 377-389.
• De Cleen, B., Glynos, J. and Mondon, A. (2018) Critical Research on Populism: Nine Rules of Engagement,  Organization, 25(5): 649-661.
• Griggs, S., Hall, S., Howarth, D. and Seigneuret, N., (2017).  Characterizing and evaluating rival discourses of the ‘sustainable city’: Towards a politics of pragmatic adversarialism . Political Geography. 59, 36-4.
• Glynos, J. and Voutyras, S. (2016) Ideology as Blocked Mourning: Greek National Identity in Times of Economic Crisis and Austerity , Journal of Political Ideologies, 21(3): 201-224· 
• Howarth, D., (2015).  Ernesto Laclau: Post-Marxism, Populism, and Critique . Routledge Taylor & Francis. 978-0-415-87087-0.
• Glynos, J., Speed, E. and West, K. (2015) Logics of Marginalisation in Health and Social Care Reform: Integration, Choice and Provider-blind Provision,  Critical Social Policy, 35(1): 45-68.

Our academic staff frequently feature within the wider press and media. Below are some examples of their latest appearances:

• View The New Pretender article by Anam Kuraishi, PhD candidate, the University of Essex titled  "Freedom-loving Brits" Taking back control: Post-truth in the COVID era.  
• Read The New Pretender article  Of apples and oranges - Donald Trump and the threat of aspiration fascism  which features research by Julius Schneider & Reid Kleinberg who are PhD researchers at cIDA, Department of Government, University of Essex.
• View The New Pretender article by Craig Love PhD candidate, University of Essex titled  Seizing the moment? Scotland, coronavirus and the question of Independence . 
• Read The New Pretender article  Expectedly unprecedented: Media discourses on COVID-19 and gender violence in Mexico  which features research by Jimena Vazquez & Kostis Roussos. 
• Read The New Pretender article by Ryan Flitcroft titled  Our finest hour - A very British response to crisis.  
• View The Conversation article by Professor David Howarth on  Heathrow 2.0 a 'sustainable airport' that pretends no one has to choose between planes and pollution.  
• Read the Prospect article by Professor David Howarth and Professor Steven Griggs titled Heathrow's third runway won't fly . 
• Read the Independent article  The success of Syriza in Greece has been driven by Marxism, populism and yes - Essex University.  
• Read The Conversation article by Professor David Howarth titled Boris Island is sunk but it may help other airports expand.

Research Projects

• Subjectivity and valuation in community economies (ESRC, 2020 - 2021)
• Exit Polling on Effectiveness and Research of Bradwell B Public Consultation Event (BECG, 2020)
• The Legacy of Discourse Studies: Current Applications and the Future of the Essex School in Ideology and Discourse Analysis (ESRC, 2018 -2019)
• Timebanking in Essex (ESRC, 2016-2018)
• Collaborative Governance in Cities under Austerity: An Eight-case Comparative Study (ESRC, 2014)
• The prospects for sustainable aviation in the UK (ESRC, 2010)

Watch the latest seminars and lectures from the Centre for Ideology on Discourse Analysis.

• For enquiries contact your Student Services Hub
• University of Essex
• Wivenhoe Park
• Colchester CO4 3SQ
• Accessibility
• Privacy and Cookie Policy

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base

Methodology

• Critical Discourse Analysis | Definition, Guide & Examples

Critical Discourse Analysis | Definition, Guide & Examples

Published on August 23, 2019 by Amy Luo . Revised on June 22, 2023.

Critical discourse analysis (or discourse analysis) is a research method for studying written or spoken language in relation to its social context. It aims to understand how language is used in real life situations.

When you conduct discourse analysis, you might focus on:

• The purposes and effects of different types of language
• Cultural rules and conventions in communication
• How values, beliefs and assumptions are communicated
• How language use relates to its social, political and historical context

Discourse analysis is a common qualitative research method in many humanities and social science disciplines, including linguistics, sociology, anthropology, psychology and cultural studies.  

Table of contents

What is discourse analysis used for, how is discourse analysis different from other methods, how to conduct discourse analysis, other interesting articles.

Conducting discourse analysis means examining how language functions and how meaning is created in different social contexts. It can be applied to any instance of written or oral language, as well as non-verbal aspects of communication such as tone and gestures.

Materials that are suitable for discourse analysis include:

• Books, newspapers and periodicals
• Marketing material, such as brochures and advertisements
• Business and government documents
• Websites, forums, social media posts and comments
• Interviews and conversations

By analyzing these types of discourse, researchers aim to gain an understanding of social groups and how they communicate.

Here's why students love Scribbr's proofreading services

Discover proofreading & editing

Unlike linguistic approaches that focus only on the rules of language use, discourse analysis emphasizes the contextual meaning of language.

It focuses on the social aspects of communication and the ways people use language to achieve specific effects (e.g. to build trust, to create doubt, to evoke emotions, or to manage conflict).

Instead of focusing on smaller units of language, such as sounds, words or phrases, discourse analysis is used to study larger chunks of language, such as entire conversations, texts, or collections of texts. The selected sources can be analyzed on multiple levels.

Discourse analysis is a qualitative and interpretive method of analyzing texts (in contrast to more systematic methods like content analysis ). You make interpretations based on both the details of the material itself and on contextual knowledge.

There are many different approaches and techniques you can use to conduct discourse analysis, but the steps below outline the basic structure you need to follow. Following these steps can help you avoid pitfalls of confirmation bias that can cloud your analysis.

Step 1: Define the research question and select the content of analysis

To do discourse analysis, you begin with a clearly defined research question . Once you have developed your question, select a range of material that is appropriate to answer it.

Discourse analysis is a method that can be applied both to large volumes of material and to smaller samples, depending on the aims and timescale of your research.

Step 2: Gather information and theory on the context

Next, you must establish the social and historical context in which the material was produced and intended to be received. Gather factual details of when and where the content was created, who the author is, who published it, and whom it was disseminated to.

As well as understanding the real-life context of the discourse, you can also conduct a literature review on the topic and construct a theoretical framework to guide your analysis.

Step 3: Analyze the content for themes and patterns

This step involves closely examining various elements of the material – such as words, sentences, paragraphs, and overall structure – and relating them to attributes, themes, and patterns relevant to your research question.

Step 4: Review your results and draw conclusions

Once you have assigned particular attributes to elements of the material, reflect on your results to examine the function and meaning of the language used. Here, you will consider your analysis in relation to the broader context that you established earlier to draw conclusions that answer your research question.

If you want to know more about statistics , methodology , or research bias , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

• Normal distribution
• Measures of central tendency
• Chi square tests
• Confidence interval
• Quartiles & Quantiles
• Cluster sampling
• Stratified sampling
• Thematic analysis
• Cohort study
• Peer review
• Ethnography

Research bias

• Implicit bias
• Cognitive bias
• Conformity bias
• Hawthorne effect
• Availability heuristic
• Attrition bias
• Social desirability bias

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

Luo, A. (2023, June 22). Critical Discourse Analysis | Definition, Guide & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved April 5, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/discourse-analysis/

Is this article helpful?

Other students also liked

What is qualitative research | methods & examples, what is a case study | definition, examples & methods, how to do thematic analysis | step-by-step guide & examples, what is your plagiarism score.

Prague PhD course on Discourse Studies and Method: Using Discourse-Theoretical Analysis and Discursive-Material Analysis

Prague Czechia

Call for Participation in PhD course

Discourse Studies and Method: Using Discourse-Theoretical Analysis and Discursive-Material Analysis at Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic

https://iksz.fsv.cuni.cz/en/study/phd-studies/phd-course

About the course

Course title: Discourse Studies and Method: Using Discourse-Theoretical Analysis and Discursive-Material Analysis

Course coordinator and leader: Professor Nico Carpentier

Course credits: 5 credits

Course timing: The course will be organised on 23 October - 27 October 2023

Course location: Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic

Course background and purpose

The course aims to discuss two methods in the field of discourse studies: Discourse-theoretical analysis (DTA) and Discursive-material analysis (DMA). Both are grounded in so-called high theory, with discourse theory as its main starting point, but with elements of actor network theory and new materialism. This course will start with an introduction to these theoretical models, but will then move on to their analytical deployment in communication and media studies research.

Special attention will be spent on the creation of a theory-grounded analytical model to guide the research. Apart from attending lectures, participants will be expected to participate in both theoretical and research-driven workshops.

Learning outcomes

On completion of this course, successful students will be able to:

• have a deeper understanding of the field of discourse studies, and in particular of its discourse-theoretical component
• have a deeper understanding of the theoretical relationship between the discursive and the material
• know how to translate discourse-theoretical models into analytical practice, through the use of the notion of the sensitising concept (applied to discourse theory, and to discourse-theoretical rereading of other theories)
• set up an analytical model for a discourse-theoretical analysis and a discursive-material analysis

Teaching and evaluation

The one-week course will be organised in 10 teaching slots, combining lectures and workshops. These workshops are partially theoretical (presenting an article or chapter), and partially research-driven (presenting an analytical model).

A certificate (with a grade “Pass”) is given after 1) attendance of minimally 8 meetings, 2) a working group theoretical presentation, 3) an individual case study presentation.

Available participant slots and costs

A total number of 20 participant slots are available. The participation fee is 50 euros, and only covers course attendance. Participants are required to pay themselves for their travel and accommodation costs, and all other expenses.

Registration

The deadline for the application submission is 01 July 2023 .

To register for this course, the following three documents have to be submitted:

• A motivation letter
• A brief description/abstract of the ongoing (PhD) research (including the current stage of the research)
• A CV (including information about your university affiliation and your contact information)

Please send these documents to Mazlum Kemal Dağdelen ([email protected]) or use the form on the course webpage for submission.

The fee for course participation is 50 euros. Selected participants will be informed about the payment procedure.

Contact information

If you need any further information/assistance, please get in touch with Mazlum Kemal Dağdelen ([email protected])

Course readings

Main reading:

Carpentier, Nico (2017) The Discursive-Material Knot: Cyprus in Conflict and Community Media Participation. New York: Peter Lang.

Secondary readings:

Butler, Judith (1993) Bodies that matter. On the discursive limits of 'sex'. New York, London: Routledge. 

Dolphijn, Rick, van der Tuin, Iris (2012) New materialism: Interviews and cartographies. Ann Arbor: Open humanities press.

Glynos, Jason, Howarth, David (2007) Logics of critical explanation in social and political theory. London and New York: Routledge.

Howarth, David (2000) Discourse. Buckingham, Philadelphia: Open University Press.

Howarth, David (2012) "Hegemony, political subjectivity, and radical democracy", in Simon Critchley and Oliver Marchart (eds.) Laclau: A critical reader. London: Routledge, pp. 256-276.

Howarth, David, Stavrakakis, Yannis (2000) “Introducing discourse theory and political analysis”, in David Howarth, Aletta J. Norval and Yannis Stavrakakis (eds.) Discourse theory and political analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 1-23.

Laclau, Ernesto, Chantal Mouffe (1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.

Latour, Bruno (2005) Reassembling the social. An introduction to Actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mouffe, Chantal (2005) On the Political. London: Routledge.

Philips, Louise, Jørgensen, Marianne W. (2002) Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: Sage.

Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty (1988) "Can the subaltern speak?", in Cary Nelson and Lawrence Grossberg (eds.) Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, pp. 271-313.

Torfing, Jacob (1999) New Theories of Discourse. Laclau, Mouffe and Žižek. Oxford: Blackwell.