assignment problem notes

Assignment Problem: Meaning, Methods and Variations | Operations Research

After reading this article you will learn about:- 1. Meaning of Assignment Problem 2. Definition of Assignment Problem 3. Mathematical Formulation 4. Hungarian Method 5. Variations.

Meaning of Assignment Problem:

An assignment problem is a particular case of transportation problem where the objective is to assign a number of resources to an equal number of activities so as to minimise total cost or maximize total profit of allocation.

The problem of assignment arises because available resources such as men, machines etc. have varying degrees of efficiency for performing different activities, therefore, cost, profit or loss of performing the different activities is different.

Thus, the problem is “How should the assignments be made so as to optimize the given objective”. Some of the problem where the assignment technique may be useful are assignment of workers to machines, salesman to different sales areas.

Definition of Assignment Problem:

ADVERTISEMENTS:

Suppose there are n jobs to be performed and n persons are available for doing these jobs. Assume that each person can do each job at a term, though with varying degree of efficiency, let c ij be the cost if the i-th person is assigned to the j-th job. The problem is to find an assignment (which job should be assigned to which person one on-one basis) So that the total cost of performing all jobs is minimum, problem of this kind are known as assignment problem.

The assignment problem can be stated in the form of n x n cost matrix C real members as given in the following table:

• In the above asignment problem, we have to provide assignments such that there is one to one assignments and the overall cost is minimized.

How Assignment Problem is related to LPP? OR Write mathematical formulation of Assignment Model.

→ Assignment Model is a special application of Linear Programming (LP).

→ The mathematical formulation for Assignment Model is given below:

→ Let, C i j \text {C}_{ij} C ij ​ denotes the cost of resources 'i' to the task 'j' ; such that

→ Now assignment problems are of the Minimization type. So, our objective function is to minimize the overall cost.

→ Subjected to constraint;

(i) For all j t h j^{th} j t h task, only one i t h i^{th} i t h resource is possible:

(ii) For all i t h i^{th} i t h resource, there is only one j t h j^{th} j t h task possible;

(iii) x i j x_{ij} x ij ​ is '0' or '1'.

Types of Assignment Problem:

(i) balanced assignment problem.

• It consist of a suqare matrix (n x n).
• Number of rows = Number of columns

(ii) Unbalanced Assignment Problem

• It consist of a Non-square matrix.
• Number of rows ≠ \not=  = Number of columns

Methods to solve Assignment Model:

(i) integer programming method:.

In assignment problem, either allocation is done to the cell or not.

So this can be formulated using 0 or 1 integer.

While using this method, we will have n x n decision varables, and n+n equalities.

So even for 4 x 4 matrix problem, it will have 16 decision variables and 8 equalities.

So this method becomes very lengthy and difficult to solve.

(ii) Transportation Methods:

As assignment problem is a special case of transportation problem, it can also be solved using transportation methods.

In transportation methods ( NWCM , LCM & VAM), the total number of allocations will be (m+n-1) and the solution is known as non-degenerated. (For eg: for 3 x 3 matrix, there will be 3+3-1 = 5 allocations)

But, here in assignment problems, the matrix is a square matrix (m=n).

So total allocations should be (n+n-1), i.e. for 3 x 3 matrix, it should be (3+3-1) = 5

But, we know that in 3 x 3 assignment problem, maximum possible possible assignments are 3 only.

So, if are we will use transportation methods, then the solution will be degenerated as it does not satisfy the condition of (m+n-1) allocations.

So, the method becomes lengthy and time consuming.

(iii) Enumeration Method:

It is a simple trail and error type method.

Consider a 3 x 3 assignment problem. Here the assignments are done randomly and the total cost is found out.

For 3 x 3 matrix, the total possible trails are 3! So total 3! = 3 x 2 x 1 = 6 trails are possible.

The assignments which gives minimum cost is selected as optimal solution.

But, such trail and error becomes very difficult and lengthy.

If there are more number of rows and columns, ( For eg: For 6 x 6 matrix, there will be 6! trails. So 6! = 6 x 5 x 4 x 3 x 2 x 1 = 720 trails possible) then such methods can't be applied for solving assignments problems.

(iv) Hungarian Method:

It was developed by two mathematicians of Hungary. So, it is known as Hungarian Method.

It is also know as Reduced matrix method or Flood's technique.

There are two main conditions for applying Hungarian Method:

(1) Square Matrix (n x n). (2) Problem should be of minimization type.

Suggested Notes:

Modified Distribution Method (MODI) | Transportation Problem | Transportation Model

Stepping Stone | Transportation Problem | Transportation Model

Vogel’s Approximation Method (VAM) | Method to Solve Transportation Problem | Transportation Model

Transportation Model - Introduction

North West Corner Method | Method to Solve Transportation Problem | Transportation Model

Least Cost Method | Method to Solve Transportation Problem | Transportation Model

Tie in selecting row and column (Vogel's Approximation Method - VAM) | Numerical | Solving Transportation Problem | Transportation Model

Crashing Special Case - Multiple (Parallel) Critical Paths

Crashing Special Case - Indirect cost less than Crash Cost

Basics of Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT)

Numerical on PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique)

Network Analysis - Dealing with Network Construction Basics

Construct a project network with predecessor relationship | Operation Research | Numerical

Graphical Method | Methods to solve LPP | Linear Programming

Basics of Linear Programming

Linear Programming Problem (LPP) Formulation with Numericals

All comments that you add will await moderation. We'll publish all comments that are topic related, and adhere to our Code of Conduct .

Want to tell us something privately? Contact Us

Post comment

Education Lessons

Stay in touch, [notes] operation research, [notes] dynamics of machinery, [notes] maths, [notes] science, [notes] computer aided design.

Brute Force and Exhaustive Search

Design of algorithms, table of contents, brute force, exhaustive search, selection sort, bubble sort, sequential search, string matching, closest-pair, travelling salesman problem, knapsack problem, assignment problem.

• shouldn’t be overlooked: brute force is applicable to wide variety of problems
• for some problems, produces reasonable algorithms of practical value with no limit on instance size
• expense of designing more efficient algorithm may not be justified if brute-force can solve with acceptable speed
• even if inefficient, it may be useful for solving small-size instances of a problem
• provides baseline to judge more efficient alternatives against
• scan entire list for smallest element
• swap this element with the first element

repeat from second element, third element, …

• after $n-1$ passes, list is sorted
• basic operation: key comparison

number of times executed depends only on array size \(C(n) = \sum_{i=0}^{n-2}\sum_{j=i+1}^{n-1}1=\sum_{i=0}^{n-2}[(n-1)-(i+1)+1]\\\ =\sum_{i=0}^{n-2}(n-1-i)=\frac{n(n-1)}{2}\in\Theta(n^2)\)

• selection sort is $\Theta(n^2)$ for all inputs
• number of key swaps is only $\Theta(n)$ which makes it suitable for swapping small number of large items
• compare adjacent elements of list
• exchange them if they are out of order: largest element “bubbles up” to end of list
• next pass: 2nd largest element bubbles up
• repeat $n-1$ times until all elements are sorted
• number of key comparisons same for all arrays
• number of key swaps is dependent on input
• in worst case (decreasing array): same as the number of key comparisons
• can make a simple tweak to improve the algorithm: if there are no exchanges during a pass, the list is sorted and we can stop. It is still $\Theta(n^2)$ on worst and average cases

First application of brute-force approach often results in an algorithm that can be improved with modest effort

• compare successive elements of a list with a given search key until either a match is found (successful search) or list is exhausted without finding a match (unsuccessful search)
• strength: simplicity
• weakness: inefficiency
• simple enhancement: if you append search key to end of the list, search for the key will have to be successful, and therefore you can eliminate end of list check altogether
• enhancement for sorted input: stop search if element is $\ge$ search key
• text: string of $n$ characters
• pattern: string of $m (\le n)$ characters
• find $i$, index of leftmost character of text substring matching the pattern
• align pattern against first $m$ characters
• start matching corresponding pairs of characters from left to right until either all characters match, or a mismatch is found
• no match: shift pattern one position to right and repeat
• match: return index
• last possible position there can still be a match: $n-m$
• In worst case, algorithm needs to make $m(n-m+1)$ comparisons, so $\in O(mn)$j e.g.
• in average case, has been shown to be linear, $\Theta(n)$
• find two closest points in a set of $n$ points
• numerical data: typically uses Euclidean distance
• text, non-numerical data: may use other metric, e.g. Hamming distance
• bottom-up algorithm:
• begin with each element as separate cluster, merge into successively larger clusters by combining pairs of clusters
• distance between points $p_i(x_i,y_i), p_j(x_j,y_j)$ is: \(d(p_i,p_j) = \sqrt{(x_i-x_j)^2+(y_i-y_j)^2}\)
• avoid repeating distance computation for pairs of points multiple times $d(p_i,p_j), d(p_j, p_i)$ so only compute for $(p_i, p_j)$ where $i < j$
• Computing sqrt is tricky: to improve this, we can simply compute $d^2$ and then compute $sqrt(d)$ when we are returning the value
• basic operation: squaring a number, which happens twice for each pair of points
• so the complexity is
• generate each element of the problem domain
• select those that satisfy all constraints
• find desired elements (e.g. one that optimises objective function)
• requires algorithm for generating combinatorial objects: this is currently assumed to exist
• vertex: city
• edge weight: distance
• with this formulation, problem becomes finding the shortest Hamiltonian circuit of the graph
• $v_{i_0}$ is at the start and end
• each vertex is distinct
• assume, without loss of generality, all circuits start and end at one particular vertex (as they are cycles)
• we can generate all tours as all permutations of $n-1$ intermediate cities, compute tour length, and find the shortest one
• some of the tours differ only by direction: you can then cut the number of vertex permutations in half: only consider permutations in which intermediate vertex b precedes vertex c
• exhaustive search impractical for TSP for all but very small $n$
• $n$ items of known weights $w_1, …, w_n$ and values $v_1, …, v_n$
• knapsack of capacity $W$
• find most valuable subset of items that fit into the knapsack
• number of subsets of $n$-element set: $2^n$
• $\in\Omega(2^n), regardless of how efficiently you generate the subsets
• extremely inefficient on every input
• many computer scientists believe that such algorithms do not exist, but has not been proven
• each person is assigned to exactly one job
• each job is assigned to exactly one person
• cost that would accrue if _i_th person is assigned to _j_th job is $C[i,j]$ for each pair $i, j\in [1, …, n]$

find an assignment with minimum total cost

• feasible solutions can be described by $n$-tuples $\langle j_i, .., j_n\rangle$
• $j_i$ indicates job number assigned to $i$th person
• there is a one-to-one correspondence between feasible assignments and permutations of first $n$ integers
• generate all permutations of $1, …, n$
• compute total cost of each assignment
• select the feasible assignment with the lowest cost
• number of permutations in general case: $n!$
• exhaustive search impractical for all but very small instances of the problem
• Hungarian method is a more efficient algorithm
• most often, there are no known polynomial-time algorithms for problems whose domains grow exponentially (for exact solutions)

Edit this page .

• Analysis of Algorithms
• Backtracking
• Dynamic Programming
• Divide and Conquer
• Geometric Algorithms
• Mathematical Algorithms
• Pattern Searching
• Bitwise Algorithms
• Branch & Bound
• Randomized Algorithms

Quadratic Assignment Problem (QAP)

• Channel Assignment Problem
• Assignment Operators In C++
• Solidity - Assignment Operators
• Job Assignment Problem using Branch And Bound
• Range Minimum Query with Range Assignment
• Transportation Problem | Set 1 (Introduction)
• Transportation Problem | Set 2 (NorthWest Corner Method)
• Transportation Problem | Set 3 (Least Cost Cell Method)
• Transportation Problem | Set 4 (Vogel's Approximation Method)
• Assignment Operators in C
• QA - Placement Quizzes | Profit and Loss | Question 7
• QA - Placement Quizzes | Profit and Loss | Question 4
• QA - Placement Quizzes | Profit and Loss | Question 12
• QA - Placement Quizzes | Profit and Loss | Question 10
• QA - Placement Quizzes | Profit and Loss | Question 8
• QA - Placement Quizzes | Age | Question 4
• QA - Placement Quizzes | Profit and Loss | Question 9
• QA - Placement Quizzes | Profit and Loss | Question 11
• IBM Placement Paper | Quantitative Analysis Set - 5
• Must Do Coding Questions for Companies like Amazon, Microsoft, Adobe, ...
• Top 50 Array Coding Problems for Interviews
• Introduction to Recursion - Data Structure and Algorithm Tutorials
• Difference between BFS and DFS
• Must Do Coding Questions for Product Based Companies
• A* Search Algorithm
• Top 10 Algorithms in Interview Questions
• Sliding Window Technique
• How to write a Pseudo Code?
• Asymptotic Notation and Analysis (Based on input size) in Complexity Analysis of Algorithms

The Quadratic Assignment Problem (QAP) is an optimization problem that deals with assigning a set of facilities to a set of locations, considering the pairwise distances and flows between them.

The problem is to find the assignment that minimizes the total cost or distance, taking into account both the distances and the flows.

The distance matrix and flow matrix, as well as restrictions to ensure each facility is assigned to exactly one location and each location is assigned to exactly one facility, can be used to formulate the QAP as a quadratic objective function.

The QAP is a well-known example of an NP-hard problem , which means that for larger cases, computing the best solution might be difficult. As a result, many algorithms and heuristics have been created to quickly identify approximations of answers.

There are various types of algorithms for different problem structures, such as:

• Precise algorithms
• Approximation algorithms
• Metaheuristics like genetic algorithms and simulated annealing
• Specialized algorithms

Example: Given four facilities (F1, F2, F3, F4) and four locations (L1, L2, L3, L4). We have a cost matrix that represents the pairwise distances or costs between facilities. Additionally, we have a flow matrix that represents the interaction or flow between locations. Find the assignment that minimizes the total cost based on the interactions between facilities and locations. Each facility must be assigned to exactly one location, and each location can only accommodate one facility.

Facilities cost matrix:

Flow matrix:

To solve the QAP, various optimization techniques can be used, such as mathematical programming, heuristics, or metaheuristics. These techniques aim to explore the search space and find the optimal or near-optimal solution.

The solution to the QAP will provide an assignment of facilities to locations that minimizes the overall cost.

The solution generates all possible permutations of the assignment and calculates the total cost for each assignment. The optimal assignment is the one that results in the minimum total cost.

To calculate the total cost, we look at each pair of facilities in (i, j) and their respective locations (location1, location2). We then multiply the cost of assigning facility1 to facility2 (facilities[facility1][facility2]) with the flow from location1 to location2 (locations[location1][location2]). This process is done for all pairs of facilities in the assignment, and the costs are summed up.

Overall, the output tells us that assigning facilities to locations as F1->L1, F3->L2, F2->L3, and F4->L4 results in the minimum total cost of 44. This means that Facility 1 is assigned to Location 1, Facility 3 is assigned to Location 2, Facility 2 is assigned to Location 3, and Facility 4 is assigned to Location 4, yielding the lowest cost based on the given cost and flow matrices.This example demonstrates the process of finding the optimal assignment by considering the costs and flows associated with each facility and location. The objective is to find the assignment that minimizes the total cost, taking into account the interactions between facilities and locations.

Applications of the QAP include facility location, logistics, scheduling, and network architecture, all of which require effective resource allocation and arrangement.

Please Login to comment...

Similar reads.

Improve your Coding Skills with Practice

What kind of Experience do you want to share?

Quantitative Techniques: Theory and Problems by P. C. Tulsian, Vishal Pandey

Get full access to Quantitative Techniques: Theory and Problems and 60K+ other titles, with a free 10-day trial of O'Reilly.

There are also live events, courses curated by job role, and more.

WHAT IS ASSIGNMENT PROBLEM

Assignment Problem is a special type of linear programming problem where the objective is to minimise the cost or time of completing a number of jobs by a number of persons.

The assignment problem in the general form can be stated as follows:

“Given n facilities, n jobs and the effectiveness of each facility for each job, the problem is to assign each facility to one and only one job in such a way that the measure of effectiveness is optimised (Maximised or Minimised).”

Several problems of management has a structure identical with the assignment problem.

Example I A manager has four persons (i.e. facilities) available for four separate jobs (i.e. jobs) and the cost of assigning (i.e. effectiveness) each job to each ...

Get Quantitative Techniques: Theory and Problems now with the O’Reilly learning platform.

O’Reilly members experience books, live events, courses curated by job role, and more from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers.

Don’t leave empty-handed

Get Mark Richards’s Software Architecture Patterns ebook to better understand how to design components—and how they should interact.

It’s yours, free.

Check it out now on O’Reilly

Dive in for free with a 10-day trial of the O’Reilly learning platform—then explore all the other resources our members count on to build skills and solve problems every day.

Quadratic assignment problem

Author: Thomas Kueny, Eric Miller, Natasha Rice, Joseph Szczerba, David Wittmann (SysEn 5800 Fall 2020)

• 1 Introduction
• 2.1 Koopmans-Beckman Mathematical Formulation
• 2.2.1 Parameters
• 2.3.1 Optimization Problem
• 2.4 Computational Complexity
• 2.5 Algorithmic Discussions
• 2.6 Branch and Bound Procedures
• 2.7 Linearizations
• 3.1 QAP with 3 Facilities
• 4.1 Inter-plant Transportation Problem
• 4.2 The Backboard Wiring Problem
• 4.3 Hospital Layout
• 4.4 Exam Scheduling System
• 5 Conclusion
• 6 References

Introduction

The Quadratic Assignment Problem (QAP), discovered by Koopmans and Beckmann in 1957 [1] , is a mathematical optimization module created to describe the location of invisible economic activities. An NP-Complete problem, this model can be applied to many other optimization problems outside of the field of economics. It has been used to optimize backboards, inter-plant transportation, hospital transportation, exam scheduling, along with many other applications not described within this page.

Theory, Methodology, and/or Algorithmic Discussions

Koopmans-beckman mathematical formulation.

Economists Koopmans and Beckman began their investigation of the QAP to ascertain the optimal method of locating important economic resources in a given area. The Koopmans-Beckman formulation of the QAP aims to achieve the objective of assigning facilities to locations in order to minimize the overall cost. Below is the Koopmans-Beckman formulation of the QAP as described by neos-guide.org.

Quadratic Assignment Problem Formulation

Inner Product

Note: The true objective cost function only requires summing entries above the diagonal in the matrix comprised of elements

Since this matrix is symmetric with zeroes on the diagonal, dividing by 2 removes the double count of each element to give the correct cost value. See the Numerical Example section for an example of this note.

Optimization Problem

With all of this information, the QAP can be summarized as:

Computational Complexity

QAP belongs to the classification of problems known as NP-complete, thus being a computationally complex problem. QAP’s NP-completeness was proven by Sahni and Gonzalez in 1976, who states that of all combinatorial optimization problems, QAP is the “hardest of the hard”. [2]

Algorithmic Discussions

While an algorithm that can solve QAP in polynomial time is unlikely to exist, there are three primary methods for acquiring the optimal solution to a QAP problem:

• Dynamic Program
• Cutting Plane

Branch and Bound Procedures

The third method has been proven to be the most effective in solving QAP, although when n > 15, QAP begins to become virtually unsolvable.

The Branch and Bound method was first proposed by Ailsa Land and Alison Doig in 1960 and is the most commonly used tool for solving NP-hard optimization problems.

A branch-and-bound algorithm consists of a systematic enumeration of candidate solutions by means of state space search: the set of candidate solutions is thought of as forming a rooted tree with the full set at the root. The algorithm explores branches of this tree, which represent subsets of the solution set. Before one lists all of the candidate solutions of a branch, the branch is checked against upper and lower estimated bounds on the optimal solution, and the branch is eliminated if it cannot produce a better solution than the best one found so far by the algorithm.

Linearizations

The first attempts to solve the QAP eliminated the quadratic term in the objective function of

in order to transform the problem into a (mixed) 0-1 linear program. The objective function is usually linearized by introducing new variables and new linear (and binary) constraints. Then existing methods for (mixed) linear integer programming (MILP) can be applied. The very large number of new variables and constraints, however, usually poses an obstacle for efficiently solving the resulting linear integer programs. MILP formulations provide LP relaxations of the problem which can be used to compute lower bounds.

Numerical Example

Qap with 3 facilities.

Applications

Inter-plant transportation problem.

The QAP was first introduced by Koopmans and Beckmann to address how economic decisions could be made to optimize the transportation costs of goods between both manufacturing plants and locations. [1] Factoring in the location of each of the manufacturing plants as well as the volume of goods between locations to maximize revenue is what distinguishes this from other linear programming assignment problems like the Knapsack Problem.

The Backboard Wiring Problem

As the QAP is focused on minimizing the cost of traveling from one location to another, it is an ideal approach to determining the placement of components in many modern electronics. Leon Steinberg proposed a QAP solution to optimize the layout of elements on a blackboard by minimizing the total amount of wiring required. [4]

When defining the problem Steinberg states that we have a set of n elements

as well as a set of r points

In his paper he derives the below formula:

In his paper Steinberg a backboard with a 9 by 4 array, allowing for 36 potential positions for the 34 components that needed to be placed on the backboard. For the calculation, he selected a random initial placement of s1 and chose a random family of 25 unconnected sets.

The initial placement of components is shown below:

After the initial placement of elements, it took an additional 35 iterations to get us to our final optimized backboard layout. Leading to a total of 59 iterations and a final wire length of 4,969.440.

Hospital Layout

Building new hospitals was a common event in 1977 when Alealid N Elshafei wrote his paper on "Hospital Layouts as a Quadratic Assignment Problem". [5] With the high initial cost to construct the hospital and to staff it, it is important to ensure that it is operating as efficiently as possible. Elshafei's paper was commissioned to create an optimization formula to locate clinics within a building in such a way that minimizes the total distance that a patient travels within the hospital throughout the year. When doing a study of a major hospital in Cairo he determined that the Outpatient ward was acting as a bottleneck in the hospital and focused his efforts on optimizing the 17 departments there.

Elshafei identified the following QAP to determine where clinics should be placed:

For the Cairo hospital with 17 clinics, and one receiving and recording room bringing us to a total of 18 facilities. By running the above optimization Elshafei was able to get the total distance per year down to 11,281,887 from a distance of 13,973,298 based on the original hospital layout.

Exam Scheduling System

The scheduling system uses matrices for Exams, Time Slots, and Rooms with the goal of reducing the rate of schedule conflicts. To accomplish this goal, the “examination with the highest cross faculty student is been prioritized in the schedule after which the examination with the highest number of cross-program is considered and finally with the highest number of repeating student, at each stage group with the highest number of student are prioritized.” [6]

• ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Koopmans, T., & Beckmann, M. (1957). Assignment Problems and the Location of Economic Activities. Econometrica, 25(1), 53-76. doi:10.2307/1907742
• ↑ 2.0 2.1 Quadratic Assignment Problem. (2020). Retrieved December 14, 2020, from https://neos-guide.org/content/quadratic-assignment-problem
• ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 Burkard, R. E., Çela, E., Pardalos, P. M., & Pitsoulis, L. S. (2013). The Quadratic Assignment Problem. https://www.opt.math.tugraz.at/~cela/papers/qap_bericht.pdf .
• ↑ 4.0 4.1 Leon Steinberg. The Backboard Wiring Problem: A Placement Algorithm. SIAM Review . 1961;3(1):37.
• ↑ 5.0 5.1 Alwalid N. Elshafei. Hospital Layout as a Quadratic Assignment Problem. Operational Research Quarterly (1970-1977) . 1977;28(1):167. doi:10.2307/300878
• ↑ 6.0 6.1 Muktar, D., & Ahmad, Z.M. (2014). Examination Scheduling System Based On Quadratic Assignment.

Navigation menu

Browse Course Material

Course info.

• Dr. Casey Rodriguez

Departments

• Mathematics

As Taught In

• Mathematical Analysis

Learning Resource Types

Real analysis, assignment 1 (pdf).

You are leaving MIT OpenCourseWare

• Study Guides
• Homework Questions

Assignment #4 Depreciation and Depletion (1)