what constitutes successful research proposal identify its elements in details

• Customer Reviews
• Extended Essays
• IB Internal Assessment
• Theory of Knowledge
• Literature Review
• Dissertations
• Essay Writing
• Research Writing
• Assignment Help
• Capstone Projects
• College Application
• Online Class

What Are The Elements Of A Good Research Proposal?

by  Antony W

March 10, 2023

The key to writing a great research proposal for your upcoming research project is to make sure the document has the right structure.

Your paper must include all the components that your professor expects to see. So in this guide, we’ll outline all the elements of a good research proposal and explain why they’re important.

The elements of a good research proposal are the title, the introduction, literature review, aims and objectives, methodology, scope of the research, outline and timetable, and bibliography.

It’s important to include these elements in your research proposal exactly in the order in which they appear in the list above.

Why The Key Elements Of A Research Proposal Matter

The basic elements of a research proposal are important because they communicate your thought process, present the originality of your ideas, and demonstrate that you’re passionate about the subject in question.

If you structure and write your research proposal well, your paper can convince your professor that your project is feasible and you have what it takes to take   your research project to the next level.

Have no time to read this guide and would rather get quick writing help? Let us write your research proposal for you! 

7 Key Elements of a Research Proposal 

While developing a detailed and comprehensive research proposal requires a lot of planning, attention to details, and academic writing skills , understanding the core elements of the paper is the first step to getting your proposal accepted.

So here are the elements that you should include in your research proposal.

It sounds somewhat obvious when we say that your research proposal with a title. To say the least, you already know you should.

But perhaps the most common mistake that many students make is to write general titles that lack focus.

Instead of writing a long title that’s hard to read or a short title that fails to highlight the theme of your research, write a clear and concise headline that tells your reader what your research proposal is about at a first glance.

2. Introduction

The starting paragraph to a research project is one of the elements of a good research proposal because it introduces the subject you wish to address or a research problem you wish to analyze.

Because the introduction of a research proposal is what sets the tone for the rest of the paper, it’s important to start with a hook and then organize your thoughts in a logical and organized manner.

The introduction to your research proposal should give background information and explain why you believe a research question is worth exploring. While not mandatory, you can briefly describe your methodologies in the introduction and then expand them later on.

Your introduction should be clear and concise. Make sure you include only the most relevant information in this section so you don’t make it unnecessarily too long.

3. Literature Review

Although a research proposal doesn’t include a full literature review , it’s important to include an overview of the most significant studies in your field.

The section should feature evidence and statistical data to demonstrate the significance of your research.

Through the literature review, you can easily draw your reader’s attention to existing research, identify gaps in existing studies, and make your reader understand how your proposal will contribute to the already existing research.

4. Aims and Objectives

Aims and objectives are what you wish your research proposal to accomplish. Your aims will be your overall outcome or what you want the research to achieve.

Objectives tend to be narrower and more focused. More often than not, you need to provide an explanation for each of your objectives to show how they will help to meet the aims of your study.

Unless required, you don’t really have to include a hypothesis that your research proposal looks forward to test.

5. Research Methodology

Methodologies are simply the research methods you will use to conduct your study and they must appear in your research proposal whether or not you’re conducting an experimental research.

The methodologies include analysis and sampling techniques equipment, research approaches, and ethical concerns.

Make sure your explanation for each methodology is clear and precise. It helps to justify why you’ve chosen to use a certain methodology over an alternative. This will go a long way to show that you took your time to think about your methodologies before picking them.

It’s important to explain how you will collect data, the sample size you plan to consider for your research investigation, and the techniques you consider the most appropriate to analyze the data.

6. Scope of the Research

Because you’ll be working with limited time and resource, it’s reasonable to include a section on the scope of the research in your proposal. In other words, you have to show your reader that you can start and complete your research within the constraints of these two resources.

Remember, your research will more than likely have limits, and addressing them in this section not only shows that you have given them a thought but also makes your research proposal strong and authentic.

Don’t just focus on the challenges that you’re likely to come across during your studies. You should also propose alternative solutions that you can use and why they might help.

7. Outline and Timetable

Your professor expects to see an outline and a timetable in your research proposal so it’s important that you include them in your research proposal.

The purpose of the outline is to show how you plan to structure your dissertation . Briefly note what each section will cover and explain how it all fits into the argument of your research project.

The purpose of the timetable is to show how much time you’ll need to complete your research. In particular, you need to make sure you mention exactly how long you expect each stage of your study to take.

Don’t just mention how long the research process will take. Make sure you also indicate how long you’ll take to compile your research.

Get Help with Research Proposal Writing

Knowing the elements of a good research proposal is one thing. Writing the proposal is where there’s a lot of work. If you don’t have the time to complete the work yourself, feel free to take advantage of our research proposal writing and get the paper done on time.

About the author 

Antony W is a professional writer and coach at Help for Assessment. He spends countless hours every day researching and writing great content filled with expert advice on how to write engaging essays, research papers, and assignments.

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

Chapter 14: The Research Proposal

14.3 Components of a Research Proposal

Krathwohl (2005) suggests and describes a variety of components to include in a research proposal. The following sections – Introductions, Background and significance, Literature Review; Research design and methods, Preliminary suppositions and implications; and Conclusion present these components in a suggested template for you to follow in the preparation of your research proposal.

Introduction

The introduction sets the tone for what follows in your research proposal – treat it as the initial pitch of your idea. After reading the introduction your reader should:

• understand what it is you want to do;
• have a sense of your passion for the topic; and
• be excited about the study’s possible outcomes.

As you begin writing your research proposal, it is helpful to think of the introduction as a narrative of what it is you want to do, written in one to three paragraphs. Within those one to three paragraphs, it is important to briefly answer the following questions:

• What is the central research problem?
• How is the topic of your research proposal related to the problem?
• What methods will you utilize to analyze the research problem?
• Why is it important to undertake this research? What is the significance of your proposed research? Why are the outcomes of your proposed research important? Whom are they important?

Note : You may be asked by your instructor to include an abstract with your research proposal. In such cases, an abstract should provide an overview of what it is you plan to study, your main research question, a brief explanation of your methods to answer the research question, and your expected findings. All of this information must be carefully crafted in 150 to 250 words. A word of advice is to save the writing of your abstract until the very end of your research proposal preparation. If you are asked to provide an abstract, you should include 5 to 7 key words that are of most relevance to your study. List these in order of relevance.

Background and significance

The purpose of this section is to explain the context of your proposal and to describe, in detail, why it is important to undertake this research. Assume that the person or people who will read your research proposal know nothing or very little about the research problem. While you do not need to include all knowledge you have learned about your topic in this section, it is important to ensure that you include the most relevant material that will help to explain the goals of your research.

While there are no hard and fast rules, you should attempt to address some or all of the following key points:

• State the research problem and provide a more thorough explanation about the purpose of the study than what you stated in the introduction.
• Present the rationale for the proposed research study. Clearly indicate why this research is worth doing. Answer the “so what?” question.
• Describe the major issues or problems to be addressed by your research. Do not forget to explain how and in what ways your proposed research builds upon previous related research.
• Explain how you plan to go about conducting your research.
• Clearly identify the key or most relevant sources of research you intend to use and explain how they will contribute to your analysis of the topic.
• Set the boundaries of your proposed research, in order to provide a clear focus. Where appropriate, state not only what you will study, but what will be excluded from your study.
• Provide clear definitions of key concepts and terms. Since key concepts and terms often have numerous definitions, make sure you state which definition you will be utilizing in your research.

Literature review

This key component of the research proposal is the most time-consuming aspect in the preparation of your research proposal. As described in Chapter 5 , the literature review provides the background to your study and demonstrates the significance of the proposed research. Specifically, it is a review and synthesis of prior research that is related to the problem you are setting forth to investigate. Essentially, your goal in the literature review is to place your research study within the larger whole of what has been studied in the past, while demonstrating to your reader that your work is original, innovative, and adds to the larger whole.

As the literature review is information dense, it is essential that this section be intelligently structured to enable your reader to grasp the key arguments underpinning your study. However, this can be easier to state and harder to do, simply due to the fact there is usually a plethora of related research to sift through. Consequently, a good strategy for writing the literature review is to break the literature into conceptual categories or themes, rather than attempting to describe various groups of literature you reviewed. Chapter 5   describes a variety of methods to help you organize the themes.

Here are some suggestions on how to approach the writing of your literature review:

• Think about what questions other researchers have asked, what methods they used, what they found, and what they recommended based upon their findings.
• Do not be afraid to challenge previous related research findings and/or conclusions.
• Assess what you believe to be missing from previous research and explain how your research fills in this gap and/or extends previous research.

It is important to note that a significant challenge related to undertaking a literature review is knowing when to stop. As such, it is important to know when you have uncovered the key conceptual categories underlying your research topic. Generally, when you start to see repetition in the conclusions or recommendations, you can have confidence that you have covered all of the significant conceptual categories in your literature review. However, it is also important to acknowledge that researchers often find themselves returning to the literature as they collect and analyze their data. For example, an unexpected finding may develop as you collect and/or analyze the data; in this case, it is important to take the time to step back and review the literature again, to ensure that no other researchers have found a similar finding. This may include looking to research outside your field.

This situation occurred with one of this textbook’s authors’ research related to community resilience. During the interviews, the researchers heard many participants discuss individual resilience factors and how they believed these individual factors helped make the community more resilient, overall. Sheppard and Williams (2016) had not discovered these individual factors in their original literature review on community and environmental resilience. However, when they returned to the literature to search for individual resilience factors, they discovered a small body of literature in the child and youth psychology field. Consequently, Sheppard and Williams had to go back and add a new section to their literature review on individual resilience factors. Interestingly, their research appeared to be the first research to link individual resilience factors with community resilience factors.

Research design and methods

The objective of this section of the research proposal is to convince the reader that your overall research design and methods of analysis will enable you to solve the research problem you have identified and also enable you to accurately and effectively interpret the results of your research. Consequently, it is critical that the research design and methods section is well-written, clear, and logically organized. This demonstrates to your reader that you know what you are going to do and how you are going to do it. Overall, you want to leave your reader feeling confident that you have what it takes to get this research study completed in a timely fashion.

Essentially, this section of the research proposal should be clearly tied to the specific objectives of your study; however, it is also important to draw upon and include examples from the literature review that relate to your design and intended methods. In other words, you must clearly demonstrate how your study utilizes and builds upon past studies, as it relates to the research design and intended methods. For example, what methods have been used by other researchers in similar studies?

While it is important to consider the methods that other researchers have employed, it is equally, if not more, important to consider what methods have not been but could be employed. Remember, the methods section is not simply a list of tasks to be undertaken. It is also an argument as to why and how the tasks you have outlined will help you investigate the research problem and answer your research question(s).

Tips for writing the research design and methods section:

Specify the methodological approaches you intend to employ to obtain information and the techniques you will use to analyze the data.

Specify the research operations you will undertake and the way you will interpret the results of those operations in relation to the research problem.

Go beyond stating what you hope to achieve through the methods you have chosen. State how you will actually implement the methods (i.e., coding interview text, running regression analysis, etc.).

Anticipate and acknowledge any potential barriers you may encounter when undertaking your research, and describe how you will address these barriers.

Explain where you believe you will find challenges related to data collection, including access to participants and information.

Preliminary suppositions and implications

The purpose of this section is to argue how you anticipate that your research will refine, revise, or extend existing knowledge in the area of your study. Depending upon the aims and objectives of your study, you should also discuss how your anticipated findings may impact future research. For example, is it possible that your research may lead to a new policy, theoretical understanding, or method for analyzing data? How might your study influence future studies? What might your study mean for future practitioners working in the field? Who or what might benefit from your study? How might your study contribute to social, economic or environmental issues? While it is important to think about and discuss possibilities such as these, it is equally important to be realistic in stating your anticipated findings. In other words, you do not want to delve into idle speculation. Rather, the purpose here is to reflect upon gaps in the current body of literature and to describe how you anticipate your research will begin to fill in some or all of those gaps.

The conclusion reiterates the importance and significance of your research proposal, and provides a brief summary of the entire proposed study. Essentially, this section should only be one or two paragraphs in length. Here is a potential outline for your conclusion:

Discuss why the study should be done. Specifically discuss how you expect your study will advance existing knowledge and how your study is unique.

Explain the specific purpose of the study and the research questions that the study will answer.

Explain why the research design and methods chosen for this study are appropriate, and why other designs and methods were not chosen.

State the potential implications you expect to emerge from your proposed study,

Provide a sense of how your study fits within the broader scholarship currently in existence, related to the research problem.

Citations and references

As with any scholarly research paper, you must cite the sources you used in composing your research proposal. In a research proposal, this can take two forms: a reference list or a bibliography. A reference list lists the literature you referenced in the body of your research proposal. All references in the reference list must appear in the body of the research proposal. Remember, it is not acceptable to say “as cited in …” As a researcher you must always go to the original source and check it for yourself. Many errors are made in referencing, even by top researchers, and so it is important not to perpetuate an error made by someone else. While this can be time consuming, it is the proper way to undertake a literature review.

In contrast, a bibliography , is a list of everything you used or cited in your research proposal, with additional citations to any key sources relevant to understanding the research problem. In other words, sources cited in your bibliography may not necessarily appear in the body of your research proposal. Make sure you check with your instructor to see which of the two you are expected to produce.

Overall, your list of citations should be a testament to the fact that you have done a sufficient level of preliminary research to ensure that your project will complement, but not duplicate, previous research efforts. For social sciences, the reference list or bibliography should be prepared in American Psychological Association (APA) referencing format. Usually, the reference list (or bibliography) is not included in the word count of the research proposal. Again, make sure you check with your instructor to confirm.

Research Methods for the Social Sciences: An Introduction Copyright © 2020 by Valerie Sheppard is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

How to Write Research Proposal: 13 Elements of Research Proposal

The Research Proposal is a concise document of your proposed research project with clearly stated objectives, expected challenges, study execution plan to achieve milestones and it must be supported with valid scientific citations. The research proposal is a document created with the intention of convincing a prospect that the research project being proposed by the candidate is worthwhile which must also focus on the candidate's capability to successfully execute the project by outlining the clear research plan to achieve set goals [1]. The inclusion of unnecessary information that is not relevant to the research being proposed also becomes the cause of the chaos that ultimately results in proposal rejection [2]. The details in a research proposal have to be extremely relevant to the subject. It must be noted as per previous studies that the research proposals are considered of good quality if and only if the writer has focused on the subject by qualitatively selecting citations to support the claims instead of quantitatively adding partial or fully irrelevant literature as in references; as of just to increase the word count of the document [3]. Research Proposal Format and Sections The research proposal is a document intended to convince the prospect that you have a worthwhile research project and capability with an organized research plan to achieve the targeted goals. Most of the research proposals lack the necessary information by skipping on essential sections in a research proposal as per previous studies and that becomes the reason for their proposal rejection. This article provides insights into writing a well-structured research proposal that contains all the essential sections. This article spotlights the major elements that must be covered in a research proposal document. These sections are the title, abstract, introduction, statement of objectives, analysis of literature, research methodology, research plan, budget estimations, research team particulars, funding source, co-worker acknowledgments, and references. Sections of a Research Proposal A well-composed research proposal begins with a short and to the point (self-explanatory) title. Whereas the introduction part must demonstrate in-depth but clearly supportive literature review to highlight the problems or challenges, objectives and significance of the research study being proposed. The research proposal needs to include all the significant elements of the proposed research project and adequate information to enable the prospect to accurately evaluate the merits and feasibility of the proposed project and the writer must be aware of the dynamic trends that may influence proposal writing by keeping the most updated scientific terms in the proposal.

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

• Visit the University of Nebraska–Lincoln
• Apply to the University of Nebraska–Lincoln
• Give to the University of Nebraska–Lincoln

Search Form

Components of a research proposal.

In general, the proposal components include:

Introduction: Provides reader with a broad overview of problem in context.

Statement of problem: Answers the question, “What research problem are you going to investigate?”

Literature review: Shows how your approach builds on existing research; helps you identify methodological and design issues in studies similar to your own; introduces you to measurement tools others have used effectively; helps you interpret findings; and ties results of your work to those who’ve preceded you.

Research design and methods: Describes how you’ll go about answering your research questions and confirming your hypothesis(es). Lists the hypothesis(es) to be tested, or states research question you’ll ask to seek a solution to your research problem. Include as much detail as possible: measurement instruments and procedures, subjects and sample size.

The research design is what you’ll also need to submit for approval from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) or the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) if your research involves human or animal subjects, respectively.

Timeline: Breaks your project into small, easily doable steps via backwards calendar.

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base
• Starting the research process
• How to Write a Research Proposal | Examples & Templates

How to Write a Research Proposal | Examples & Templates

Published on October 12, 2022 by Shona McCombes and Tegan George. Revised on November 21, 2023.

A research proposal describes what you will investigate, why it’s important, and how you will conduct your research.

The format of a research proposal varies between fields, but most proposals will contain at least these elements:

Introduction

Literature review.

• Research design

Reference list

While the sections may vary, the overall objective is always the same. A research proposal serves as a blueprint and guide for your research plan, helping you get organized and feel confident in the path forward you choose to take.

Table of contents

Research proposal purpose, research proposal examples, research design and methods, contribution to knowledge, research schedule, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about research proposals.

Academics often have to write research proposals to get funding for their projects. As a student, you might have to write a research proposal as part of a grad school application , or prior to starting your thesis or dissertation .

In addition to helping you figure out what your research can look like, a proposal can also serve to demonstrate why your project is worth pursuing to a funder, educational institution, or supervisor.

Research proposal length

The length of a research proposal can vary quite a bit. A bachelor’s or master’s thesis proposal can be just a few pages, while proposals for PhD dissertations or research funding are usually much longer and more detailed. Your supervisor can help you determine the best length for your work.

One trick to get started is to think of your proposal’s structure as a shorter version of your thesis or dissertation , only without the results , conclusion and discussion sections.

Download our research proposal template

Receive feedback on language, structure, and formatting

Professional editors proofread and edit your paper by focusing on:

• Academic style
• Vague sentences
• Style consistency

See an example

Writing a research proposal can be quite challenging, but a good starting point could be to look at some examples. We’ve included a few for you below.

• Example research proposal #1: “A Conceptual Framework for Scheduling Constraint Management”
• Example research proposal #2: “Medical Students as Mediators of Change in Tobacco Use”

Like your dissertation or thesis, the proposal will usually have a title page that includes:

• The proposed title of your project
• Your supervisor’s name
• Your institution and department

The first part of your proposal is the initial pitch for your project. Make sure it succinctly explains what you want to do and why.

Your introduction should:

• Introduce your topic
• Give necessary background and context
• Outline your  problem statement  and research questions

To guide your introduction , include information about:

• Who could have an interest in the topic (e.g., scientists, policymakers)
• How much is already known about the topic
• What is missing from this current knowledge
• What new insights your research will contribute
• Why you believe this research is worth doing

As you get started, it’s important to demonstrate that you’re familiar with the most important research on your topic. A strong literature review  shows your reader that your project has a solid foundation in existing knowledge or theory. It also shows that you’re not simply repeating what other people have already done or said, but rather using existing research as a jumping-off point for your own.

In this section, share exactly how your project will contribute to ongoing conversations in the field by:

• Comparing and contrasting the main theories, methods, and debates
• Examining the strengths and weaknesses of different approaches
• Explaining how will you build on, challenge, or synthesize prior scholarship

Following the literature review, restate your main  objectives . This brings the focus back to your own project. Next, your research design or methodology section will describe your overall approach, and the practical steps you will take to answer your research questions.

To finish your proposal on a strong note, explore the potential implications of your research for your field. Emphasize again what you aim to contribute and why it matters.

For example, your results might have implications for:

• Improving best practices
• Informing policymaking decisions
• Strengthening a theory or model
• Challenging popular or scientific beliefs
• Creating a basis for future research

Last but not least, your research proposal must include correct citations for every source you have used, compiled in a reference list . To create citations quickly and easily, you can use our free APA citation generator .

Some institutions or funders require a detailed timeline of the project, asking you to forecast what you will do at each stage and how long it may take. While not always required, be sure to check the requirements of your project.

Here’s an example schedule to help you get started. You can also download a template at the button below.

Download our research schedule template

If you are applying for research funding, chances are you will have to include a detailed budget. This shows your estimates of how much each part of your project will cost.

Make sure to check what type of costs the funding body will agree to cover. For each item, include:

• Cost : exactly how much money do you need?
• Justification : why is this cost necessary to complete the research?
• Source : how did you calculate the amount?

To determine your budget, think about:

• Travel costs : do you need to go somewhere to collect your data? How will you get there, and how much time will you need? What will you do there (e.g., interviews, archival research)?
• Materials : do you need access to any tools or technologies?
• Help : do you need to hire any research assistants for the project? What will they do, and how much will you pay them?

If you want to know more about the research process , methodology , research bias , or statistics , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

Methodology

• Sampling methods
• Simple random sampling
• Stratified sampling
• Cluster sampling
• Likert scales
• Reproducibility

 Statistics

• Null hypothesis
• Statistical power
• Probability distribution
• Effect size
• Poisson distribution

Research bias

• Optimism bias
• Cognitive bias
• Implicit bias
• Hawthorne effect
• Anchoring bias
• Explicit bias

Once you’ve decided on your research objectives , you need to explain them in your paper, at the end of your problem statement .

Keep your research objectives clear and concise, and use appropriate verbs to accurately convey the work that you will carry out for each one.

I will compare …

A research aim is a broad statement indicating the general purpose of your research project. It should appear in your introduction at the end of your problem statement , before your research objectives.

Research objectives are more specific than your research aim. They indicate the specific ways you’ll address the overarching aim.

A PhD, which is short for philosophiae doctor (doctor of philosophy in Latin), is the highest university degree that can be obtained. In a PhD, students spend 3–5 years writing a dissertation , which aims to make a significant, original contribution to current knowledge.

A PhD is intended to prepare students for a career as a researcher, whether that be in academia, the public sector, or the private sector.

A master’s is a 1- or 2-year graduate degree that can prepare you for a variety of careers.

All master’s involve graduate-level coursework. Some are research-intensive and intend to prepare students for further study in a PhD; these usually require their students to write a master’s thesis . Others focus on professional training for a specific career.

Critical thinking refers to the ability to evaluate information and to be aware of biases or assumptions, including your own.

Like information literacy , it involves evaluating arguments, identifying and solving problems in an objective and systematic way, and clearly communicating your ideas.

The best way to remember the difference between a research plan and a research proposal is that they have fundamentally different audiences. A research plan helps you, the researcher, organize your thoughts. On the other hand, a dissertation proposal or research proposal aims to convince others (e.g., a supervisor, a funding body, or a dissertation committee) that your research topic is relevant and worthy of being conducted.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

McCombes, S. & George, T. (2023, November 21). How to Write a Research Proposal | Examples & Templates. Scribbr. Retrieved April 15, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/research-process/research-proposal/

Is this article helpful?

Shona McCombes

Other students also liked, how to write a problem statement | guide & examples, writing strong research questions | criteria & examples, how to write a literature review | guide, examples, & templates, "i thought ai proofreading was useless but..".

I've been using Scribbr for years now and I know it's a service that won't disappoint. It does a good job spotting mistakes”

Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Assignments

• Annotated Bibliography
• Analyzing a Scholarly Journal Article
• Group Presentations
• Dealing with Nervousness
• Using Visual Aids
• Grading Someone Else's Paper
• Types of Structured Group Activities
• Group Project Survival Skills
• Leading a Class Discussion
• Multiple Book Review Essay
• Reviewing Collected Works
• Writing a Case Analysis Paper
• Writing a Case Study
• About Informed Consent
• Writing Field Notes
• Writing a Policy Memo
• Writing a Reflective Paper
• Writing a Research Proposal
• Generative AI and Writing
• Acknowledgments

The goal of a research proposal is twofold: to present and justify the need to study a research problem and to present the practical ways in which the proposed study should be conducted. The design elements and procedures for conducting research are governed by standards of the predominant discipline in which the problem resides, therefore, the guidelines for research proposals are more exacting and less formal than a general project proposal. Research proposals contain extensive literature reviews. They must provide persuasive evidence that a need exists for the proposed study. In addition to providing a rationale, a proposal describes detailed methodology for conducting the research consistent with requirements of the professional or academic field and a statement on anticipated outcomes and benefits derived from the study's completion.

Krathwohl, David R. How to Prepare a Dissertation Proposal: Suggestions for Students in Education and the Social and Behavioral Sciences . Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 2005.

How to Approach Writing a Research Proposal

Your professor may assign the task of writing a research proposal for the following reasons:

• Develop your skills in thinking about and designing a comprehensive research study;
• Learn how to conduct a comprehensive review of the literature to determine that the research problem has not been adequately addressed or has been answered ineffectively and, in so doing, become better at locating pertinent scholarship related to your topic;
• Improve your general research and writing skills;
• Practice identifying the logical steps that must be taken to accomplish one's research goals;
• Critically review, examine, and consider the use of different methods for gathering and analyzing data related to the research problem; and,
• Nurture a sense of inquisitiveness within yourself and to help see yourself as an active participant in the process of conducting scholarly research.

A proposal should contain all the key elements involved in designing a completed research study, with sufficient information that allows readers to assess the validity and usefulness of your proposed study. The only elements missing from a research proposal are the findings of the study and your analysis of those findings. Finally, an effective proposal is judged on the quality of your writing and, therefore, it is important that your proposal is coherent, clear, and compelling.

Regardless of the research problem you are investigating and the methodology you choose, all research proposals must address the following questions:

• What do you plan to accomplish? Be clear and succinct in defining the research problem and what it is you are proposing to investigate.
• Why do you want to do the research? In addition to detailing your research design, you also must conduct a thorough review of the literature and provide convincing evidence that it is a topic worthy of in-depth study. A successful research proposal must answer the "So What?" question.
• How are you going to conduct the research? Be sure that what you propose is doable. If you're having difficulty formulating a research problem to propose investigating, go here for strategies in developing a problem to study.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

• Failure to be concise . A research proposal must be focused and not be "all over the map" or diverge into unrelated tangents without a clear sense of purpose.
• Failure to cite landmark works in your literature review . Proposals should be grounded in foundational research that lays a foundation for understanding the development and scope of the the topic and its relevance.
• Failure to delimit the contextual scope of your research [e.g., time, place, people, etc.]. As with any research paper, your proposed study must inform the reader how and in what ways the study will frame the problem.
• Failure to develop a coherent and persuasive argument for the proposed research . This is critical. In many workplace settings, the research proposal is a formal document intended to argue for why a study should be funded.
• Sloppy or imprecise writing, or poor grammar . Although a research proposal does not represent a completed research study, there is still an expectation that it is well-written and follows the style and rules of good academic writing.
• Too much detail on minor issues, but not enough detail on major issues . Your proposal should focus on only a few key research questions in order to support the argument that the research needs to be conducted. Minor issues, even if valid, can be mentioned but they should not dominate the overall narrative.

Procter, Margaret. The Academic Proposal.  The Lab Report. University College Writing Centre. University of Toronto; Sanford, Keith. Information for Students: Writing a Research Proposal. Baylor University; Wong, Paul T. P. How to Write a Research Proposal. International Network on Personal Meaning. Trinity Western University; Writing Academic Proposals: Conferences, Articles, and Books. The Writing Lab and The OWL. Purdue University; Writing a Research Proposal. University Library. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Structure and Writing Style

Beginning the Proposal Process

As with writing most college-level academic papers, research proposals are generally organized the same way throughout most social science disciplines. The text of proposals generally vary in length between ten and thirty-five pages, followed by the list of references. However, before you begin, read the assignment carefully and, if anything seems unclear, ask your professor whether there are any specific requirements for organizing and writing the proposal.

A good place to begin is to ask yourself a series of questions:

• What do I want to study?
• Why is the topic important?
• How is it significant within the subject areas covered in my class?
• What problems will it help solve?
• How does it build upon [and hopefully go beyond] research already conducted on the topic?
• What exactly should I plan to do, and can I get it done in the time available?

In general, a compelling research proposal should document your knowledge of the topic and demonstrate your enthusiasm for conducting the study. Approach it with the intention of leaving your readers feeling like, "Wow, that's an exciting idea and I can’t wait to see how it turns out!"

Most proposals should include the following sections:

I.  Introduction

In the real world of higher education, a research proposal is most often written by scholars seeking grant funding for a research project or it's the first step in getting approval to write a doctoral dissertation. Even if this is just a course assignment, treat your introduction as the initial pitch of an idea based on a thorough examination of the significance of a research problem. After reading the introduction, your readers should not only have an understanding of what you want to do, but they should also be able to gain a sense of your passion for the topic and to be excited about the study's possible outcomes. Note that most proposals do not include an abstract [summary] before the introduction.

Think about your introduction as a narrative written in two to four paragraphs that succinctly answers the following four questions :

• What is the central research problem?
• What is the topic of study related to that research problem?
• What methods should be used to analyze the research problem?
• Answer the "So What?" question by explaining why this is important research, what is its significance, and why should someone reading the proposal care about the outcomes of the proposed study?

II.  Background and Significance

This is where you explain the scope and context of your proposal and describe in detail why it's important. It can be melded into your introduction or you can create a separate section to help with the organization and narrative flow of your proposal. Approach writing this section with the thought that you can’t assume your readers will know as much about the research problem as you do. Note that this section is not an essay going over everything you have learned about the topic; instead, you must choose what is most relevant in explaining the aims of your research.

To that end, while there are no prescribed rules for establishing the significance of your proposed study, you should attempt to address some or all of the following:

• State the research problem and give a more detailed explanation about the purpose of the study than what you stated in the introduction. This is particularly important if the problem is complex or multifaceted .
• Present the rationale of your proposed study and clearly indicate why it is worth doing; be sure to answer the "So What? question [i.e., why should anyone care?].
• Describe the major issues or problems examined by your research. This can be in the form of questions to be addressed. Be sure to note how your proposed study builds on previous assumptions about the research problem.
• Explain the methods you plan to use for conducting your research. Clearly identify the key sources you intend to use and explain how they will contribute to your analysis of the topic.
• Describe the boundaries of your proposed research in order to provide a clear focus. Where appropriate, state not only what you plan to study, but what aspects of the research problem will be excluded from the study.
• If necessary, provide definitions of key concepts, theories, or terms.

III.  Literature Review

Connected to the background and significance of your study is a section of your proposal devoted to a more deliberate review and synthesis of prior studies related to the research problem under investigation . The purpose here is to place your project within the larger whole of what is currently being explored, while at the same time, demonstrating to your readers that your work is original and innovative. Think about what questions other researchers have asked, what methodological approaches they have used, and what is your understanding of their findings and, when stated, their recommendations. Also pay attention to any suggestions for further research.

Since a literature review is information dense, it is crucial that this section is intelligently structured to enable a reader to grasp the key arguments underpinning your proposed study in relation to the arguments put forth by other researchers. A good strategy is to break the literature into "conceptual categories" [themes] rather than systematically or chronologically describing groups of materials one at a time. Note that conceptual categories generally reveal themselves after you have read most of the pertinent literature on your topic so adding new categories is an on-going process of discovery as you review more studies. How do you know you've covered the key conceptual categories underlying the research literature? Generally, you can have confidence that all of the significant conceptual categories have been identified if you start to see repetition in the conclusions or recommendations that are being made.

NOTE: Do not shy away from challenging the conclusions made in prior research as a basis for supporting the need for your proposal. Assess what you believe is missing and state how previous research has failed to adequately examine the issue that your study addresses. Highlighting the problematic conclusions strengthens your proposal. For more information on writing literature reviews, GO HERE .

To help frame your proposal's review of prior research, consider the "five C’s" of writing a literature review:

• Cite , so as to keep the primary focus on the literature pertinent to your research problem.
• Compare the various arguments, theories, methodologies, and findings expressed in the literature: what do the authors agree on? Who applies similar approaches to analyzing the research problem?
• Contrast the various arguments, themes, methodologies, approaches, and controversies expressed in the literature: describe what are the major areas of disagreement, controversy, or debate among scholars?
• Critique the literature: Which arguments are more persuasive, and why? Which approaches, findings, and methodologies seem most reliable, valid, or appropriate, and why? Pay attention to the verbs you use to describe what an author says/does [e.g., asserts, demonstrates, argues, etc.].
• Connect the literature to your own area of research and investigation: how does your own work draw upon, depart from, synthesize, or add a new perspective to what has been said in the literature?

IV.  Research Design and Methods

This section must be well-written and logically organized because you are not actually doing the research, yet, your reader must have confidence that you have a plan worth pursuing . The reader will never have a study outcome from which to evaluate whether your methodological choices were the correct ones. Thus, the objective here is to convince the reader that your overall research design and proposed methods of analysis will correctly address the problem and that the methods will provide the means to effectively interpret the potential results. Your design and methods should be unmistakably tied to the specific aims of your study.

Describe the overall research design by building upon and drawing examples from your review of the literature. Consider not only methods that other researchers have used, but methods of data gathering that have not been used but perhaps could be. Be specific about the methodological approaches you plan to undertake to obtain information, the techniques you would use to analyze the data, and the tests of external validity to which you commit yourself [i.e., the trustworthiness by which you can generalize from your study to other people, places, events, and/or periods of time].

When describing the methods you will use, be sure to cover the following:

• Specify the research process you will undertake and the way you will interpret the results obtained in relation to the research problem. Don't just describe what you intend to achieve from applying the methods you choose, but state how you will spend your time while applying these methods [e.g., coding text from interviews to find statements about the need to change school curriculum; running a regression to determine if there is a relationship between campaign advertising on social media sites and election outcomes in Europe ].
• Keep in mind that the methodology is not just a list of tasks; it is a deliberate argument as to why techniques for gathering information add up to the best way to investigate the research problem. This is an important point because the mere listing of tasks to be performed does not demonstrate that, collectively, they effectively address the research problem. Be sure you clearly explain this.
• Anticipate and acknowledge any potential barriers and pitfalls in carrying out your research design and explain how you plan to address them. No method applied to research in the social and behavioral sciences is perfect, so you need to describe where you believe challenges may exist in obtaining data or accessing information. It's always better to acknowledge this than to have it brought up by your professor!

V.  Preliminary Suppositions and Implications

Just because you don't have to actually conduct the study and analyze the results, doesn't mean you can skip talking about the analytical process and potential implications . The purpose of this section is to argue how and in what ways you believe your research will refine, revise, or extend existing knowledge in the subject area under investigation. Depending on the aims and objectives of your study, describe how the anticipated results will impact future scholarly research, theory, practice, forms of interventions, or policy making. Note that such discussions may have either substantive [a potential new policy], theoretical [a potential new understanding], or methodological [a potential new way of analyzing] significance.   When thinking about the potential implications of your study, ask the following questions:

• What might the results mean in regards to challenging the theoretical framework and underlying assumptions that support the study?
• What suggestions for subsequent research could arise from the potential outcomes of the study?
• What will the results mean to practitioners in the natural settings of their workplace, organization, or community?
• Will the results influence programs, methods, and/or forms of intervention?
• How might the results contribute to the solution of social, economic, or other types of problems?
• Will the results influence policy decisions?
• In what way do individuals or groups benefit should your study be pursued?
• What will be improved or changed as a result of the proposed research?
• How will the results of the study be implemented and what innovations or transformative insights could emerge from the process of implementation?

NOTE:   This section should not delve into idle speculation, opinion, or be formulated on the basis of unclear evidence . The purpose is to reflect upon gaps or understudied areas of the current literature and describe how your proposed research contributes to a new understanding of the research problem should the study be implemented as designed.

ANOTHER NOTE : This section is also where you describe any potential limitations to your proposed study. While it is impossible to highlight all potential limitations because the study has yet to be conducted, you still must tell the reader where and in what form impediments may arise and how you plan to address them.

VI.  Conclusion

The conclusion reiterates the importance or significance of your proposal and provides a brief summary of the entire study . This section should be only one or two paragraphs long, emphasizing why the research problem is worth investigating, why your research study is unique, and how it should advance existing knowledge.

Someone reading this section should come away with an understanding of:

• Why the study should be done;
• The specific purpose of the study and the research questions it attempts to answer;
• The decision for why the research design and methods used where chosen over other options;
• The potential implications emerging from your proposed study of the research problem; and
• A sense of how your study fits within the broader scholarship about the research problem.

VII.  Citations

As with any scholarly research paper, you must cite the sources you used . In a standard research proposal, this section can take two forms, so consult with your professor about which one is preferred.

• References -- a list of only the sources you actually used in creating your proposal.
• Bibliography -- a list of everything you used in creating your proposal, along with additional citations to any key sources relevant to understanding the research problem.

In either case, this section should testify to the fact that you did enough preparatory work to ensure the project will complement and not just duplicate the efforts of other researchers. It demonstrates to the reader that you have a thorough understanding of prior research on the topic.

Most proposal formats have you start a new page and use the heading "References" or "Bibliography" centered at the top of the page. Cited works should always use a standard format that follows the writing style advised by the discipline of your course [e.g., education=APA; history=Chicago] or that is preferred by your professor. This section normally does not count towards the total page length of your research proposal.

Develop a Research Proposal: Writing the Proposal. Office of Library Information Services. Baltimore County Public Schools; Heath, M. Teresa Pereira and Caroline Tynan. “Crafting a Research Proposal.” The Marketing Review 10 (Summer 2010): 147-168; Jones, Mark. “Writing a Research Proposal.” In MasterClass in Geography Education: Transforming Teaching and Learning . Graham Butt, editor. (New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2015), pp. 113-127; Juni, Muhamad Hanafiah. “Writing a Research Proposal.” International Journal of Public Health and Clinical Sciences 1 (September/October 2014): 229-240; Krathwohl, David R. How to Prepare a Dissertation Proposal: Suggestions for Students in Education and the Social and Behavioral Sciences . Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 2005; Procter, Margaret. The Academic Proposal. The Lab Report. University College Writing Centre. University of Toronto; Punch, Keith and Wayne McGowan. "Developing and Writing a Research Proposal." In From Postgraduate to Social Scientist: A Guide to Key Skills . Nigel Gilbert, ed. (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2006), 59-81; Wong, Paul T. P. How to Write a Research Proposal. International Network on Personal Meaning. Trinity Western University; Writing Academic Proposals: Conferences , Articles, and Books. The Writing Lab and The OWL. Purdue University; Writing a Research Proposal. University Library. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

• << Previous: Writing a Reflective Paper
• Next: Generative AI and Writing >>
• Last Updated: Mar 6, 2024 1:00 PM
• URL: https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide/assignments

How to Write a Successful Research Proposal

A research proposal is essentially a plan for work in order to test a hypothesis or set of hypotheses in order to answer a research question. One of the most important things to bear in mind when drafting a proposal is the fact that authors are required to tailor it to suit the audience. If the document being written is a PhD research proposal, it is imperative that authors follow the guidelines laid out by the university or faculty for this type of document. A PhD research proposal, as an example, will be read by experts in the field. This means that authors will be expected to use jargon specific to their area. If the research proposal forms part of a grant application , authors would have to write it so that reviewers who might not be as familiar with their specialty can easily understand the research problem and why the project should receive funding. A typical research proposal will generally include a title, summary of the aims and expected outcomes, literature review , research methodology, proposed timeline, and references. The characteristics of a good research title all generally focus on catching the reader’s attention.  Again, word limits, formatting, and what is considered essential content will depend on the institution or faculty requirements and should be strictly adhered to.

Writing An Effective Research Proposal

Since the details of what should be in the research proposal will be governed by the institution, the rest of this article will focus on general hints to write a high-quality research proposal.

• Although introduction is the first major section, it is not mandatory that it has to be written first. Authors may find it easier to start writing the research methodology since methods have usually been standardized. Once this is on paper, it will help authors feel accomplished and will no longer be intimidated by a blank page.
• An effective research title should be easily understood by someone who is not a specialist in the field. It should be seen as more of a marketing tool than a demonstration of scientific knowledge. Authors should read the title aloud. Authors should consider if the title is easily understood and if the significance of what they are trying to accomplish clear. The purpose of the title is to pique the interest of the reader; which is why it needs to be concise and easily understood while communicating why this research needs to be done.
• Authors should ensure that the purpose of the research is apparent from the beginning of the document how the study could improve or change lives. If the research is not applied, this will be harder to justify but authors can cite examples of blue skies research that has led to technologies that are in use today. It is fairly well accepted by the research community that both fundamental and applied research projects are necessary. It is critical that anyone who reads the document agrees that the research question needs to be answered.
• Demonstrate competence. Even if we all agree that the PhD research proposal must be executed, the proposal will not be successful without some key elements. One of these elements is demonstrating that the infrastructure is in place to support the execution of the experiments. The team that will be conducting the work is also a critical component of this success. Authors should include evidence of their track record where possible to inspire confidence that they are the person for the job. Where authors lack competence, they may include collaborators with the necessary skills to help answer the research question.
• Authors should never underestimate how getting others to review their proposal can improve it. Often the suggestions will help clarify the document or they may suggest a new angle that has been missed out. Once authors have incorporated any suggestions that were found useful, it would be a good idea to ask a new person to review it before submission. Doing suggested corrections at this stage generally, means there will be fewer problems with the study identified by reviewers.
• Authors must remember that the proposal is not the final thesis. Reviewers expect proposals to change as the study commences. The results obtained may require authors to change direction or add new sections and that is acceptable. The most important thing is that authors continue to use the scientific method to find answers to their stated research question.

Key Points to Remember

These are just some guidelines on writing a research proposal. Writing a successful PhD research proposal means remembering to write for a specific audience and adhering to the format prescribed by the institution. There are a few characteristics of a good research title but the main thing authors need to remember is that the point of the title is to hold the reader’s attention and pique their interest in the rest of the research proposal. Authors should never submit the proposal without having someone else review it and should always feel free to work on whatever section they need to – there is no rule that says it has to be written in its presentation order.

Rate this article Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Enago Academy's Most Popular Articles

• Career Corner
• PhDs & Postdocs

How to Write a Data Management Plan During Grant Application

This article is also available in: Russian, Portuguese, Turkish, and Spanish

7 Tips to Draft a Compelling Budget for Grant Proposal

While financial support is crucial for conducting research, acquiring funds for your research is a…

• Old Webinars
• Webinar Mobile App

Mastering the Art of Creating Successful Grant Proposals

Types of research funding Types of research funders Planning for a research proposal Writing a…

Overcoming Challenges in Academic Writing

Importance of good English writing skills Application of English grammar Writing an impactful grant proposal…

Cómo redactar una subvención de un millón de dólares

Elegir entre subvenciones y becas de investigación Identificación de los organismos de financiación Selección de…

Learning the Art of Crafting Effective Research Grant Proposals

Navigating the Grant Development Process

What You Should Know Before Writing a Research Grant Proposal

Sign-up to read more

Subscribe for free to get unrestricted access to all our resources on research writing and academic publishing including:

• 2000+ blog articles
• 50+ Webinars
• 10+ Expert podcasts
• 50+ Infographics
• 10+ Checklists
• Research Guides

We hate spam too. We promise to protect your privacy and never spam you.

I am looking for Editing/ Proofreading services for my manuscript Tentative date of next journal submission:

What should universities' stance be on AI tools in research and academic writing?

Research & Innovation

Elements of A Successful Proposal

General considerations.

• Relates to the purposes and goals of applicant agency
• Strictly adheres to the content and format guidelines of the applicant agency
• Is directed toward the appropriate audience (i.e. those who will review the proposal)
• Clearly addresses the review criteria of the funding source
• Is interesting to read
• Uses a clear, concise, coherent writing style, free of jargon, superfluous information, and undefined acronyms (i.e. it’s easy to read)
• Is organized in a logical manner that is easy to follow
• Uses headings so that information can be found easily
• Calls attention to the most significant points in the proposal through the use of underlining, differences in type, spacing, titles, and appropriate summaries
• Is paginated from beginning to end, including appendix when directly appended to the proposal
• Makes appropriate use of figures, graphs, charts, and other visual materials
• Is so meticulously proofread that it has few (if any) grammatical errors, misspellings, or typos

The Proposal

• Has title that is appropriate, descriptive, and (perhaps) imaginative
• Unless it is brief, has a table of contents that is straight-forward and accurate
• Has a clear, concise, informative abstract/executive summary that can stand alone
• Has clearly stated goals and objectives that are not buried in a morass of narrative
• Follows naturally from previous/current programs or research
• Documents the needs to be met or problems to be solved by the proposed project
• Indicates that the project’s hypotheses rest on sufficient evidence and are conceptually sound
• Clearly describes who will do the work (who), the methods that will be employed (what), which facilities or location will be used (where), and a timetable of events (when)
• Justifies the significance and/or contribution of the project on current scientific knowledge or a given population of people or a body of writing/art and socio economic benefit when appropriate
• Includes appropriate and sufficient citations to prior work, ongoing studies, and related literature
• Establishes the competence and scholarship of the individual(s) involved
• Doesn’t assume that reviewers “know what you mean”
• Makes no unsupported assumptions
• Discusses potential pitfalls and alternative approaches
• Presents a plan for evaluating data or the success of project
• Is of reasonable dimensions (i.e. not trying to answer all of the questions at once)
• Proposes work which can be accomplished in the time allotted
• Demonstrates the individual(s) and/or organization are qualified to perform the proposed project; doesn’t assume that the applicant agency “knows all about you”
• Documents facilities necessary for the success of the project
• Includes necessary letters of support and other supporting documentation
• Includes vitae which demonstrate the credentials required (e.g., Don’t use a promotion and tenure vitae replete with institutional committee assignments for a research proposal)
• Includes a bibliography of cited references
• Has a budget which corresponds to the narrative: all major elements detailed in the budget are described in the narrative and vice versa
• Has a budget sufficient to perform the tasks described in the narrative
• Has a budget which corresponds to the applicant’s agency’s guidelines with respect to content and detail

Proposal Titles

Weak: Genetic Diversity in Luidia clathrada Better: Genetic Diversity in the Starfish Luidia clathrada

Weak: Three Plays by Eugene O’Neill Better: A Comparison of Female Characters in Three Eugene O’Neill Plays

Weak: Improving Math Education in Elementary Schools Better: Innovative Instructional Materials to Improve Math Education in Elementary Schools

Weak: Preparing a New Agenda for Minority Education at the University of Iowa (What’s at the University…the agenda or minority education?) Better: Minority Education: Preparing a New Agenda for the University of Iowa

Weak: Special Studies Directed at the Simplification of Analytical Procedures Concerned with Identification of Blood Proteins Better: Methods to Simplify Analytical Procedures Used to Identify Blood Proteins

Weak: Uses of Marine Plant Species in Food Production to Bring About Reductions in Food Costs Better: Uses of Marine Plant Species in Food Production to Reduce Food Costs

Weak: New Perspectives in Learning Better: New Perspectives in Learning: A Program to Facilitate the Retention and Graduation of Minority Students

Weak: Regulation of K Secretion by the CCD Better: Regulation of Potassium Secretion by the Cortical Collecting Duct

Weak: CT Versus MR in the Diagnosis of Brain Disorders Better: Computer Tomography (CT) Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MR) in the Diagnosis of Brain Disorders

How to Write a Successful Research Proposal

Table of contents

Meredith Sell

It’s not easy to convince a university or federal institute to fund your research, but does it have to be hard?

Research proposals are typically required for… 

• A senior thesis
• A graduate dissertation
• Grants/funding
• Fellowships
• Ethical approval from academic institutions

If you’re serious about advanced education in the sciences or social sciences or if you want to work as a researcher, you won’t be able to avoid writing research proposals. They’re an inevitable part of the work, a guaranteed hurdle between you and groundbreaking discoveries.

So how do you clear that hurdle? How do you write a convincing research proposal that wins over your academic advisor, the grant-funding agency, or other powers that be?

While there’s no single approach to research proposals that will gain approval every time, this guide will help you write a research proposal that presents:

An original idea that adds knowledge and value to your field of study and fills gaps in the existing scholarship.

Let’s learn how to write a stand-out research proposal.

The Basics of a Research Proposal

A research proposal makes the argument that your particular research idea is necessary and will provide value to your field of study. 

Different institutions and funding organizations will have their own specific requirements for a research proposal, but in general, you’ll probably need:

Abstract/Summary

Introduction, methods/materials, expected results/hypotheses.

Each of these sections plays a different role in the argument you’re making.

This sums up your proposal overall, giving readers the nutshell version of your idea, why it’s needed, and how you will approach it.

The intro sets up your proposal. It sketches out your project aims and the big research questions you’re seeking to answer. This may include background information, or the background may be in its own section.

A significant chunk of your proposal will be spent on background information, including a detailed literature review. The goal of this section is to show your audience what is known about your particular topic and where the gaps are, especially the gap that your project seeks to fill.

According to Teresa Buckner, PhD, Assistant Professor at the University of Northern Colorado, you’ll want to structure this section in a way that naturally leads into your research idea , arranging information and subsections in a way that raises the very questions your research will seek to answer.

How will you answer your research questions? What approaches will you use to gather and analyze data? What supplies or materials will you need? 

If you’re running experiments on mice, you’ll need to know how many mice, what kind, and where they will be kept. If you’re conducting a survey, you’ll need to outline how you will identify subjects for your survey and what survey methods you will use to reduce bias. 

This section shows that you’ve thought your project through. You know what steps you’ll take to carry out your research, what you’ll need to complete those steps, and what hiccups might come up along the way.

What do you expect your research to find? What hypotheses do you have? This is directly tied to your research questions and may stand in its own section or be part of another.

Your project should, in some way, seek to turn over a new leaf of knowledge. Whether through methodologies, use of tech, or approaching a research question that hasn’t been meaningfully answered yet, there should be something novel about your idea.

Special considerations when writing a research proposal for a grant

If you’re writing a proposal in pursuit of grant funding for your project, you’ll likely also need sections that explain:

• Budget (how much money you need and how it will be used)
• Facilities (where you’ll be doing the research, any unique benefits of your institution like state-of-the-art technology or lab space)
• Team (who you’re working with, especially if your collaborators are noted experts in their fields)
• Ethical approval (you should have this from your institution before seeking grant funding)

All of these different sections require a lot of one thing: thought. You need to think through your project from beginning to end, identify how it fits in the larger landscape of scholarship, figure out how you’ll carry it out and what you’ll need to do it well.

But where do you start?

The Optimal Order to Write Your Proposal Sections

1. start with research aims..

What are you trying to accomplish with your research? 

👆 Answer that question in a paragraph or in a single sentence. Then flesh out why you’ve chosen your particular aim.

Your answer will go in your proposal intro (or its own “Aims” section, if your institution calls for one). You’ll want to start with this element because it shapes every other piece of your proposal.

2. Develop your methods.

What is the best way to answer your research question or accomplish your aims? What have you seen in the literature as effective approaches to this type of question? What materials or supplies will you need to carry out your research?

Think through all of these questions and sketch out your research plan, step by step. If you can, get feedback on this section from others in your field to make sure your plan is realistic and feasible and uses the best methodology and analytical approach for your particular research question.

3. Write the relevant background.

Your initial research idea should come from ample time spent reading the scientific literature on your topic. Now’s the time to narrow down what literature makes the most sense to reference and summarize as you craft the background section. 

Remember: this section should be crafted in a way that naturally leads to your research question. 

You’ll want to inform your readers on the current knowledge on your topic, while also showing the gaps and (if possible) why those gaps exist. 

Buckner recommends outlining this section — and using headings to shape and organize everything in a logical manner. Your headings can serve as topic sentences for their subsections, so if you know what points you need to make in this section, use those to craft your headings . Then sort your background information under the headings they fit or support.

4. Describe how your approach will bring innovation and new information to the field.

In light of the background you just wrote and your particular aims and methods, how will your project turn a new leaf in your field of study?

What’s fresh or new or different about your approach in comparison to what has already been done?

Explain this as clearly and specifically as possible.

5. Summarize everything in an abstract.

Now that you have the main sections written, write them up in a condensed, concise manner. Typically, this will be one paragraph, so if you need help, enlist Wordtune Read to summarize your sections and use Wordtune Editor to tighten your self-drafted abstract.

6. Cite your sources.

Especially important for the background section, make sure that you properly credit any scholarship you reference using the citation style required by your institution or grant-making organization. A citation tool like Chegg’s Cite This For Me or MyBib will help you follow that style consistently — and avoid botching names and titles.

6 Tips to Make Your Proposal Stand Out

“If you’re submitting a grant, there is a nonzero chance that it will be rejected,” Buckner says. And if you’re making your career in research, your research proposals will be rejected sometimes. 

What you can do is focus on what you actually control: the quality of your research proposal. These tips may just help you turn what would have been a “nope” into a full-blown “yes.”

1. Develop your research idea from the existing literature of your field.

The best research ideas combine originality and a fresh angle with a grounding in existing knowledge. You want to know the field you’re researching in so you don’t propose redundant ideas, but you’ll also benefit from holding a fresh perspective that’s open to trying new approaches and methodologies to answer nagging research questions.

To develop a research question that addresses a gap in the literature, pay special attention to the conclusions of the studies you’re reading.

What do the authors call for more research on? Is there a consistent pattern across studies of authors pointing out the same gap over and over again?

Answer those calls with your research proposal — and then reference those studies in your background section.

2. Get feedback on your ideas and methods early on.

“Iron sharpens iron” — and that’s true in research settings as well. As you develop your ideas and think through how, exactly, you’re going to tackle your research questions, talk with your collaborators, mentors, advisors, and others in your field to make sure you’re on the right track. 

They can help you narrow down an idea that’s too broad or refine your methods to make sure they’re effective. Enlisting help early in the process will set you up for success in the long term — especially if you’re getting feedback from the same people who will either approve or reject your final proposal.

3. Look at other proposals to make sure you’re on the right track.

Your grant provider or academic department probably has a repository of past research proposals that were successful. If you can’t find them online, reach out to your contact to request some. 

Other approved proposals can give you insight on what the organizations look for: how much detail they want, what types of ideas they favor, and how long (or short) yours could be.

4. Make a checklist of the specific parameters for your proposal.

Every institution and grant-making organization has their own requirements for research proposals. Make sure you meet them by turning the requirements into a checklist for your proposal.

Do this right away, at the beginning of the proposal-writing process, and use the checklist to guide you along. On top of the satisfaction that comes with checking each item off the list, you can be confident knowing your proposal won’t lose points for missing required sections and details.

5. Use Wordtune to polish your writing and help you summarize everything for your abstract.

A research proposal is a project. By the time you write the abstract, you’ve probably been staring at the same document for too long. So take a break, and hand things off to your AI writing assistant, Wordtune. 

Simply paste your proposal text into Wordtune Read , and Wordtune will provide summarized points that you can condense into an abstract. 

Once you have a rough abstract written, paste it into Wordtune Editor for some help fine-tuning verbiage and tightening the content. Then, you can stick the abstract into the top of your document and run a final round of edits, with Wordtune helping you smooth out clunky sentences and formalize informal language.

Share This Article:

Preparing for Graduate School: 8 Tips to Know

How to Master Concise Writing: 9 Tips to Write Clear and Crisp Content

Title Case vs. Sentence Case: How to Capitalize Your Titles

Looking for fresh content, thank you your submission has been received.

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Indian J Anaesth
• v.60(9); 2016 Sep

How to write a research proposal?

Department of Anaesthesiology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Devika Rani Duggappa

Writing the proposal of a research work in the present era is a challenging task due to the constantly evolving trends in the qualitative research design and the need to incorporate medical advances into the methodology. The proposal is a detailed plan or ‘blueprint’ for the intended study, and once it is completed, the research project should flow smoothly. Even today, many of the proposals at post-graduate evaluation committees and application proposals for funding are substandard. A search was conducted with keywords such as research proposal, writing proposal and qualitative using search engines, namely, PubMed and Google Scholar, and an attempt has been made to provide broad guidelines for writing a scientifically appropriate research proposal.

INTRODUCTION

A clean, well-thought-out proposal forms the backbone for the research itself and hence becomes the most important step in the process of conduct of research.[ 1 ] The objective of preparing a research proposal would be to obtain approvals from various committees including ethics committee [details under ‘Research methodology II’ section [ Table 1 ] in this issue of IJA) and to request for grants. However, there are very few universally accepted guidelines for preparation of a good quality research proposal. A search was performed with keywords such as research proposal, funding, qualitative and writing proposals using search engines, namely, PubMed, Google Scholar and Scopus.

Five ‘C’s while writing a literature review

BASIC REQUIREMENTS OF A RESEARCH PROPOSAL

A proposal needs to show how your work fits into what is already known about the topic and what new paradigm will it add to the literature, while specifying the question that the research will answer, establishing its significance, and the implications of the answer.[ 2 ] The proposal must be capable of convincing the evaluation committee about the credibility, achievability, practicality and reproducibility (repeatability) of the research design.[ 3 ] Four categories of audience with different expectations may be present in the evaluation committees, namely academic colleagues, policy-makers, practitioners and lay audiences who evaluate the research proposal. Tips for preparation of a good research proposal include; ‘be practical, be persuasive, make broader links, aim for crystal clarity and plan before you write’. A researcher must be balanced, with a realistic understanding of what can be achieved. Being persuasive implies that researcher must be able to convince other researchers, research funding agencies, educational institutions and supervisors that the research is worth getting approval. The aim of the researcher should be clearly stated in simple language that describes the research in a way that non-specialists can comprehend, without use of jargons. The proposal must not only demonstrate that it is based on an intelligent understanding of the existing literature but also show that the writer has thought about the time needed to conduct each stage of the research.[ 4 , 5 ]

CONTENTS OF A RESEARCH PROPOSAL

The contents or formats of a research proposal vary depending on the requirements of evaluation committee and are generally provided by the evaluation committee or the institution.

In general, a cover page should contain the (i) title of the proposal, (ii) name and affiliation of the researcher (principal investigator) and co-investigators, (iii) institutional affiliation (degree of the investigator and the name of institution where the study will be performed), details of contact such as phone numbers, E-mail id's and lines for signatures of investigators.

The main contents of the proposal may be presented under the following headings: (i) introduction, (ii) review of literature, (iii) aims and objectives, (iv) research design and methods, (v) ethical considerations, (vi) budget, (vii) appendices and (viii) citations.[ 4 ]

Introduction

It is also sometimes termed as ‘need for study’ or ‘abstract’. Introduction is an initial pitch of an idea; it sets the scene and puts the research in context.[ 6 ] The introduction should be designed to create interest in the reader about the topic and proposal. It should convey to the reader, what you want to do, what necessitates the study and your passion for the topic.[ 7 ] Some questions that can be used to assess the significance of the study are: (i) Who has an interest in the domain of inquiry? (ii) What do we already know about the topic? (iii) What has not been answered adequately in previous research and practice? (iv) How will this research add to knowledge, practice and policy in this area? Some of the evaluation committees, expect the last two questions, elaborated under a separate heading of ‘background and significance’.[ 8 ] Introduction should also contain the hypothesis behind the research design. If hypothesis cannot be constructed, the line of inquiry to be used in the research must be indicated.

Review of literature

It refers to all sources of scientific evidence pertaining to the topic in interest. In the present era of digitalisation and easy accessibility, there is an enormous amount of relevant data available, making it a challenge for the researcher to include all of it in his/her review.[ 9 ] It is crucial to structure this section intelligently so that the reader can grasp the argument related to your study in relation to that of other researchers, while still demonstrating to your readers that your work is original and innovative. It is preferable to summarise each article in a paragraph, highlighting the details pertinent to the topic of interest. The progression of review can move from the more general to the more focused studies, or a historical progression can be used to develop the story, without making it exhaustive.[ 1 ] Literature should include supporting data, disagreements and controversies. Five ‘C's may be kept in mind while writing a literature review[ 10 ] [ Table 1 ].

Aims and objectives

The research purpose (or goal or aim) gives a broad indication of what the researcher wishes to achieve in the research. The hypothesis to be tested can be the aim of the study. The objectives related to parameters or tools used to achieve the aim are generally categorised as primary and secondary objectives.

Research design and method

The objective here is to convince the reader that the overall research design and methods of analysis will correctly address the research problem and to impress upon the reader that the methodology/sources chosen are appropriate for the specific topic. It should be unmistakably tied to the specific aims of your study.

In this section, the methods and sources used to conduct the research must be discussed, including specific references to sites, databases, key texts or authors that will be indispensable to the project. There should be specific mention about the methodological approaches to be undertaken to gather information, about the techniques to be used to analyse it and about the tests of external validity to which researcher is committed.[ 10 , 11 ]

The components of this section include the following:[ 4 ]

Population and sample

Population refers to all the elements (individuals, objects or substances) that meet certain criteria for inclusion in a given universe,[ 12 ] and sample refers to subset of population which meets the inclusion criteria for enrolment into the study. The inclusion and exclusion criteria should be clearly defined. The details pertaining to sample size are discussed in the article “Sample size calculation: Basic priniciples” published in this issue of IJA.

Data collection

The researcher is expected to give a detailed account of the methodology adopted for collection of data, which include the time frame required for the research. The methodology should be tested for its validity and ensure that, in pursuit of achieving the results, the participant's life is not jeopardised. The author should anticipate and acknowledge any potential barrier and pitfall in carrying out the research design and explain plans to address them, thereby avoiding lacunae due to incomplete data collection. If the researcher is planning to acquire data through interviews or questionnaires, copy of the questions used for the same should be attached as an annexure with the proposal.

Rigor (soundness of the research)

This addresses the strength of the research with respect to its neutrality, consistency and applicability. Rigor must be reflected throughout the proposal.

It refers to the robustness of a research method against bias. The author should convey the measures taken to avoid bias, viz. blinding and randomisation, in an elaborate way, thus ensuring that the result obtained from the adopted method is purely as chance and not influenced by other confounding variables.

Consistency

Consistency considers whether the findings will be consistent if the inquiry was replicated with the same participants and in a similar context. This can be achieved by adopting standard and universally accepted methods and scales.

Applicability

Applicability refers to the degree to which the findings can be applied to different contexts and groups.[ 13 ]

Data analysis

This section deals with the reduction and reconstruction of data and its analysis including sample size calculation. The researcher is expected to explain the steps adopted for coding and sorting the data obtained. Various tests to be used to analyse the data for its robustness, significance should be clearly stated. Author should also mention the names of statistician and suitable software which will be used in due course of data analysis and their contribution to data analysis and sample calculation.[ 9 ]

Ethical considerations

Medical research introduces special moral and ethical problems that are not usually encountered by other researchers during data collection, and hence, the researcher should take special care in ensuring that ethical standards are met. Ethical considerations refer to the protection of the participants' rights (right to self-determination, right to privacy, right to autonomy and confidentiality, right to fair treatment and right to protection from discomfort and harm), obtaining informed consent and the institutional review process (ethical approval). The researcher needs to provide adequate information on each of these aspects.

Informed consent needs to be obtained from the participants (details discussed in further chapters), as well as the research site and the relevant authorities.

When the researcher prepares a research budget, he/she should predict and cost all aspects of the research and then add an additional allowance for unpredictable disasters, delays and rising costs. All items in the budget should be justified.

Appendices are documents that support the proposal and application. The appendices will be specific for each proposal but documents that are usually required include informed consent form, supporting documents, questionnaires, measurement tools and patient information of the study in layman's language.

As with any scholarly research paper, you must cite the sources you used in composing your proposal. Although the words ‘references and bibliography’ are different, they are used interchangeably. It refers to all references cited in the research proposal.

Successful, qualitative research proposals should communicate the researcher's knowledge of the field and method and convey the emergent nature of the qualitative design. The proposal should follow a discernible logic from the introduction to presentation of the appendices.

Financial support and sponsorship

Conflicts of interest.

There are no conflicts of interest.

How to write a Research Proposal: Components of a research proposal

Components of a research proposal.

• Useful videos
• Common mistakes to avoid
• Sage Research Methods LibGuide This link opens in a new window
• Managing sources
• Request a literature search
• Research proposal - examples
• Creating a Gantt chart
• Free Apps for Research
• Academic writing

Research proposals differ in terms of their presentation depending on what each University department requires. In other words, there is no set template  for a research proposal. Please contact your lecturer regarding the format you are expected to use for your research proposal.Thus, the components of a research proposal include, but are not limited to those mentioned in this guide.

1. The title

Try to come up with a title that is unique and at the same time easy to remember. It should also make a lasting impression to the reader and make them want to come back and read your proposal.  The title must also capture the main concepts of the study . As the research process is lengthy, it is   important that you choose a topic that you are   so curious about  that you remain motivated for the duration of the research process.  Select a topic that you will be able to complete within the time frame that you have for your research. 

3. The background

The background to the topic of your intended research must be clear and precise. It must not only include an in-depth explanation of the key points of your subject but also all the developments in the field as well as their timelines . The researcher must also explain the compelling interest in the research issue as well as the personal interest (if any) in the topic. This section must also indicate the specific area within which the topic falls in your particular field of study or subject . Aslo, how will the proposed study contribute to a particular field? In other words, the impact and the significance in a subject area must be clearly outlined. The target audience must also be clearly described.

5. Objectives of the research

It is important that the objectives are in alignment with the research questions. The objectives must indicate what the aim of the research study is.  In fact, objectives give you a clear indication of the steps that you will take to achieve the aim of the research. The objectives must be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and time-bound.

7. Literature review

Collect and present relevant literature on your topic of choice. It is important to include all the main authors or experts in a particular field.  Depending on your field of study or topic, ensure that you include recent literature as well as literature that presents counterarguments to the topic. The justification for the study needs to based on existing literature. Click here for more information on how to write a literature review.

8. Limitations and delimitations of the study

The researcher must indicate the limitations of the study which are what the researcher cannot do or factors that are beyond the researcher's control, as well as delimitations that the researcher chooses not to address for the purposes of the study. Delimitations are boundaries that the researcher has set for the study. The r easons  both for limitations and delimitations must be discussed in this section.

10. Work plan

Your schedule for the research must be stated clearly including the projected timelines for the various stages of your study.

11. Bibliography

All the sources that you have used for your proposal must be listed in alphabetical order using a referencing style that your lecturer has prescribed for your subject field.

Click here for more information on the various reference styles.

2. Introduction to the research

This section of the proposal must provide a broad overview of the topic. The jargon and key terms used in the particular topic must also be thoroughly explained in order to avoid confusion. The interest of the researcher in the particular topic must also be clearly outlined while at the same time mentioning, albeit briefly at this point, a critical review of the main literature that covers the topic.  The researcher must also provide the aim of the research by clearly and concisely stating the problem,  as well as the research questions to be dealt with.  This section must also indicate what the research study will not be covering .

4. The research questions

The research questions must state clearly what your proposed study is meant to address or answer. Ensure that you use simple language that is easy to understand, while being cognisant of the level of  your intended audience . 

6. Research methodology / research methods

This section outlines the approach which the researcher will follow in order to address the research problem and to answer all the research questions from the researcher. The research design must be clearly defined, e.g., is the research  Descriptive, Correlational, Causal-Comparative/Quasi-Experimental, Experimental, Diagnostic or Explanatory.

State clearly

• how the research will be conducted in terms of the theoretical resources that will be used
• the theoretical framework for conducting the research, which is the theoretical approach drawn from your literature review to support your research study
• proposed research method(s)
• a comparison of the advantages, limitations and suitability of the available approaches and methods for conducting your research
• participants, instruments, procedure, analysis, etc.

Research design

Selecting the approach to use

Research approach

Research design and methodology

Importance of research

Attributes of a good research scholar

Summary of different research methodologies

9. Significance of the research

The researcher must provide justification for the need to conduct the study. What is the gap that the study will fill, and what is its contribution to the  existing body of knowledge? The originality and importance of the research which will be  level appropriate, must be clearly described, for instance, the required level of originality for a fourth year research project is different to that of a doctoral candidate. 

The impact of the study for the subject field must be indicated. In other words, how will the research improve the field, who will it impact, how will it make changes in your industy or field etc.? Lastly, the proposed resaerch must be relatable , interesting and engaging .

• << Previous: Home
• Next: Books >>
• Last Updated: Dec 19, 2023 12:35 PM
• URL: https://libguides.unisa.ac.za/research_proposal

• louisville.edu
• PeopleSoft HR
• PeopleSoft Campus Solutions
• PeopleSoft Financials
• Business Ops
• Cardinal Careers

• Undergraduate
• International
• Online Learning

Office of Research and Innovation

• Events and Trainings
• News Stories
• Grand Challenges
• Research Challenge Trust Fund
• Publications and Reports
• University of Louisville Scholar and Distinguished Scholar Program
• Monthly Town Hall Recordings
• Find Funding
• Proposal Development and Submission
• Compliance and Regulatory
• IRB Submissions
• Non-Funded Agreements
• Grants Management
• Hiring and Purchasing
• Innovation and Technology Transfer
• Industry Partnerships
• Clinical Trials
• Research Centers and Institutes
• Core Facilities
• Publishing and Presenting
• Training and Workshops
• Research Handbook
• Grand Challenges / Research Priorities
• Research Systems and Tools
• Sponsoring Research
• Licensing Technologies
• Launching a Startup
• Co-location and Land
• Working with our Students
• Research Capabilities
• Get started
• Pay and Benefits
• Post-Doc Association - UofL Chapter
• Post-Doc Appointing Approval Form
• Trainings and Workshops
• Children in Research
• Open Trials
• Offices and Staff
• Unit Research Offices
• Newsletter Signup

• Common Elements of a Proposal
• Budget and Financials
• Proposal Clearance
• Designating Funding as a Gift or a Sponsored Program
• / Researchers
• / Proposal Development and Submission
• / Common Elements of a Proposal

The cover page captures items such as:

• Principal Investigator's name, address, phone number
• Title of proposal
• Sponsor name and address
• Period of performance with start and end dates
• Amount requested
• Institutional information
• Signature of Institution's Authorizing Official

The abstract outlines the proposed research, including objectives, methodology, and significance of the research.

Statement of Work or Research Plan

One of the most critical elements of a proposal or subagreement is the Statement of Work. At a minimum, it should provide a full and detailed explanation of the proposed activity, typically including project goals and Investigator responsibilities.

Budget and Budget Justification

The budget includes a reasonable estimate of the financial support required to conduct the project, including justification of budget expenses.

Typical budget categories include:

• Direct Costs

For University professional and research staff, graduate and undergraduate students, and casual or part-time workers, salary figures should be based on the percentage of effort by each individual on the project applied to his/her annual salary.

• Fringe Benefit Rates

The fringe rate is expressed as a percentage of salary. The rate may vary depending on personnel classification.

Under UofL financial policy, an item is considered capital equipment when it has a unit cost of $5,000 or more, and has a useful life of at least two years and is typically excluded from F&A.

• Materials and Supplies

Itemize supplies in separate categories, such as glassware, chemicals, radioisotopes, etc. If animals are to be purchased, state the species and the number to be used. (Typically excluded items are: office supplies,all computers, IT, and phones.)

Domestic and foreign travel should be shown separately. List the name, destination, and purpose of trip. Include transportation costs (coach airfare), registration fees, accommodation fees, and other related expenses. For any federally funded travel see the: Fly America Act Travel Policy .

• Publication Costs

Estimate the number of pages, page charges, and names of journals if possible.

• Consultants

List each consultant, their specialty or service to the project, and their daily, weekly or monthly rate of reimbursement, and show the consultant's total projected cost on the project. Include in the proposal a letter of collaboration and the consultant's curriculum vitae or biographical sketch. (This is typically non-university employees)

• Subrecipients

A subrecipient should be identified at proposal stage. Include in the main proposal the subrecipient's authorized proposal, letter of intent, statement of work, and budget with justification.

Other costs typically include items such as research publications, fees, animal per diem costs, or other project related costs and tuition when requested fro sponsor.

• Indirect Costs
• Facilities and Administrative Costs (F&A Costs)

F&A rates are negotiated with UofL's cognizant federal agency, the Department of Health and Human Services.

Use current negotiated rates in proposals for the type of project being proposed (organized research, other sponsored activity, sponsored training). If a sponsor has policies regarding F&A rates, budget rates should reflect those policies and a copy of the policy should be included with the proposal.

• Cost Sharing

Cost sharing is any cost to the project not borne by the sponsor. Cost Sharing Policy

Additional Information

Additional information may consist of the following:

• Current and pending support. Sponsor may require a listing of the PI and Key Personnel on current awards and pending proposals.
• Letters of support from non-university investigators may also be required.

The CV or Biographical Sketch is required for all key project personnel. Your CV often includes common elements describing your academic and professional experience, including responsibilities, publications, classes taught, grants received, etc. For more information on developing a CV, please visit....

If your solicitation requires a biosketch, please refer to the funder's guidelines, as these often vary.

Other support is a compilation of the current funding and time commitments for the Principal Investigator and any other key project personnel. The latter is often described as 'effort,' and represents the percentage of a researcher's working time. As a general rule, no more than 80% of a university researcher's effort may be committed to grants.

If the project is multiple years, identify percent effort per year. For example, if the first year is 20%, second year is 15% and third year is 10%, enter 20%/15%/10% or state the percentage per year.

The percent RIF (formerly "collaboration") must total 100%, distributed among project PIs and Co-Is. This information determines the distribution of research infrastructure funds (RIF) and departmental research infrastructure funds (DRIF) which are a return of a portion of indirect costs to support efforts to secure and maintain extramurally funded activities.

A list of all references needs to be cited in the proposal. If you need assistance locating relevant references, a reference librarian may be able to help you.

For more information or assistance with finding funding opportunities or developing proposals, please contact:

Office of Research Development and Strategic Initiatives

[email protected]

Phone: 502.852.6512

Fax: 502.852.8361  

FULL STAFF LISTING ->

University of Louisville

Louisville, Ky. 40202

[email protected]

502.852.6512, 502.852.8361 (Fax)

Looking for a unit within the Office of Research and Innovation? Contact information  here .

Research Proposal: Key Components

A research proposal is a document summarizing a proposed research project. It is written to give an overview of the research methods and secondary data sources you want to use in your project. Additionally, you need to state why the project is important, why you are the right person for the project (mentioning your qualifications and how your skills will play a role), how you plan to do it, and how long it will take. Some proposals that are seeking funding may include financial details such as how much money you need to carry out specific research. No matter what field you want to carry a research in, there are some common elements you need to include in your research proposal. Let’s have a look at some of those essential elements.

Without a doubt, all research proposals should include a title. What you should take into consideration is that the title should be clear and explain what your research proposal is about. It does not matter if it is short or long. The most important aspect is title is accurate and tells the reader exactly what they are going to read. In other words, the title is important in grabbing the readers’ attention from the beginning, even before they set out to read the details that follow the title.

Introduction

The introduction gives an overview of the research proposal by highlighting key points. This is where you need to introduce the problem you want to solve with your research project. Research questions and research objectives should be mentioned clearly. As important as the title is, the introduction part is perhaps more important since it includes all the essential details about your research proposal. It should not be unnecessarily too long or short and should only include everything you are going to write about in the following sections of your proposal. If you are not planning to write about something, avoid mentioning them in the introduction. Similarly, if you introduce something in the introduction part, you need to write about it later on in the following sections.

Research questions and objectives

After giving a brief introduction about research questions and objectives in the introduction part of the proposal, you need to expand on them in this section. Research questions and objectives are at the core of your proposed project; therefore, you need to pay attention to what you want to write. As in many parts of the proposal, questions and objectives should be clear and to the point. You may have many questions and objectives that stem from the primary questions and objectives, but it is unnecessary to include them since you are trying to keep the proposal concise. Another point that should be noted is that you should not include any objective just for the sake of it. The number of objectives is not important. You should focus on what you want to achieve with your research and aim for those goals.

Literature review

Every research paper should use available published studies, especially peer-reviewed papers, as they are considered credible sources of information. In this section, you need to mention previous studies on the subject and why using them is essential in your case. You may also mention possible gaps in the existing literature and how you plan to fill in those gaps with your research project.

 Usually, there is not any required number of literature you should use in your research paper, but as a thumb rule, it depends on the scope of the project and the availability of literature. While you may use tens of different books, journals, and other secondary data sources, your literature review should mention some essential ones. As your research proposal needs to be concise, you should pick literature that you think is important for your project. Mentioning something that does not have anything much in common with your research project is one of the mistakes, especially beginner researchers make. Your literature review also indicates how well you know your research topic.

Research methodology

This section describes the research methods you plan to use for your research. Depending on the nature of the research topic, you may need to use qualitative or quantitative data collection methods (surveys, questionnaires, interviews, focus groups, etc.) to gather data. The quantitative method deals with numbers and statistics. On the other hand, qualitative research tries to understand how people and why people behave in certain ways. You may also use both of these research approaches in your proposed research project. Moreover, you need to mention what methods and tools you will use to analyze your data.

Other details

There are other details you may include in your research proposal, depending on your aim. As we already mentioned, some researchers are looking for funding; therefore, it is essential to include the proposed budget you need to carry out your research. A timetable of a project is also important. Another detail you may include in the proposal is details about your research partners if you plan to collaborate with others. Their roles and qualifications should also be mentioned.

The conclusion is an overview of key details you included in the body part of the proposal. You should mention why you need to carry out the research by using the points you made in your proposal. The most important factor you need to pay attention to is that you cannot introduce any new idea/concept in conclusion. If you are planning to do so, you need to go back and add those ideas to the main body part too.

Reference list/ Bibliography

In this section, you need to reference all the sources you used in your research proposal. A reference list includes all sources you cited in your work. The bibliography is similar, but the only difference is that it includes all the references you use and plus extra reading you did but did not reference in the proposal.

SOC W 505/506 Foundations of Social Welfare Research

• What is a Research Proposal?
• Qualitative Research
• Quantitative Research
• General Research Methods
• IRB's and Research Ethics
• Data Management and Analysis

Information on Writing a Research Proposal

From the Sage Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement and Evaluation:

Research proposals are written to propose a research project and oftentimes request funding, or sponsorship, for that research. The research proposal is used to assess the originality and quality of ideas and the feasibility of a proposed project. The goal of the research proposal is to convince others that the investigator has (a) an important idea; (b) the skills, knowledge, and resources to carry out the project; and (c) a plan to implement the project on time and within budget. This entry discusses the process of developing a research proposal and the elements of an effective proposal.

For a graduate student, a research proposal may be required to begin the dissertation process. This serves to communicate the research focus to others, such as members of the student’s dissertation committee. It also indicates the investigator’s plan of action, including a level of thoroughness and sufficient detail to replicate the study. The research proposal could also be considered as a contract, once members of the committee agree to the execution of the project.

Requirements may include:  an abstract, introduction, literature review, method section, and conclusion.  A research proposal has to clearly and concisely identify the proposed research and its importance. The background literature should support the need for the research and the potential impact of the findings.

The method section proposes a comprehensive explanation of the research design, including subjects, timeline, and data analysis. Research questions should be identified as well as measurement instruments and methods to answer the research questions. Proposals for research involving human subjects identify how the investigators will protect participants throughout their research project. 

Proposals often require engaging in an external review either by an external evaluator or advisory  board consisting of expert consultants in the field. References are included to provide documentation about the supporting literature identified in the proposal. Appendixes and supplemental materials may also be included, following the sponsoring organization’s guidelines. As a general rule, educational research proposals follow the American Psychological Association formatting guidelines and publishing standards. If funding is being requested, it is important for the proposal to identify how the research will benefit the sponsoring organization and its constituents.

The success of a research proposal depends on both the quality of the project and its presentation. A proposal may have specific goals, but if they are neither realistic nor desirable, the probability of obtaining funding is reduced. Similar to manuscripts being considered for journal articles, reviewers evaluate each research proposal to identify strengths and criticisms based on a general framework and scoring rubric determined by the sponsoring organization. Research proposals that meet the scoring criteria are considered for funding opportunities. If a proposal does not meet the scoring criteria, revisions may be necessary before resubmitting the proposal to the same or a different sponsoring organization.

Common mistakes and pitfalls can often be avoided in research proposal writing through awareness and careful planning. In an effective research proposal, the research idea is clearly stated as a problem and there is an explanation of how the proposed research addresses a demonstrable gap in the current literature. In addition, an effective proposal is well structured, frames the research question(s) within sufficient context supported by the literature, and has a timeline that is appropriate to address the focus and scope of the research project. All requirements of the sponsoring organization, including required project elements and document formatting, need to be met within the research proposal. Finally, an effective proposal is engaging and demonstrates the researcher’s passion and commitment to the research addressed.

• << Previous: Databases
• Next: Qualitative Research >>
• Last Updated: Aug 11, 2023 2:12 PM
• URL: https://guides.lib.uw.edu/hsl/sw505

Be boundless

1959 NE Pacific Street | T334 Health Sciences Building | Box 357155 | Seattle, WA 98195-7155 | 206-543-3390

© 2024 University of Washington | Seattle, WA

5 Features of a Successful Research Proposal

As a researcher, you often face the challenge of securing funding to support your work. While this funding can come from different sources, the process of applying for it involves the same daunting task: writing a proposal.

Many researchers haven’t been formally trained to write a proposal. They learn as they go, mimicking grants they have read, attending writing seminars, and hoping that their great ideas will help their proposal stand out from the rest.

But that isn’t enough. Your proposal must be carefully planned and complete. It must be relevant and significant. It must be beneficial and effective.  

To accomplish those tasks, carefully and concisely answer the following questions in your proposal. Then complement that content with clear, effective writing to win over your reviewers.  

Cover the Basics

These questions address the fundamental parts of your proposal. While they might seem minor, they contribute to some of the common reasons why proposals get rejected.

Did you follow the guidelines exactly ?

Some researchers think they can trick reviewers by using a smaller font or narrower margins to gain a little more writing space. Instead, they are tricking themselves into thinking this tactic will work. Reviewers read many grants at one time, and they will notice if your font or margins are different from other applications.

Stick to the guidelines. Exactly . Use the margins, spacing, and fonts that the funder requires. Provide all of the supporting information that they request. And follow the submission instructions, even if it means you have to schlep your grant down to the post office (yes, that still happens).

Is your budget within the resources offered by the funder?

You’d be surprised how many researchers think that if they present a really great idea, then the funder might give them more money than advertised. While this can happen, it’s rare.

Make sure that your budget fits within the funder’s resources. You may need to narrow the focus of your project for this opportunity, but you can apply for additional funding to build on the project in the future.

Is your proposal well-organized and easy to follow?

Remember that the number one principle in writing is to make your reader’s job easy . Present your ideas in a logical way. Lead your reviewer through the text with headings and subheadings. And keep plenty of white space to give your reviewer pauses and breaks while they read.

Is your writing free of jargon and unnecessary acronyms?

Jargon and unnecessary acronyms can be useful if you know that your reader is familiar with them. Otherwise, these terms can be confusing. If you must use technical terms, remember to introduce and define them when they might be unfamiliar to your reader.

Is your writing free of spelling and grammar mistakes?

While a few typos are almost inevitable, too many mistakes will chip away at your credibility and raise doubt in your reviewer.

Check your writing for spelling and grammar mistakes. Have your colleagues, peers, or a professional editor review your proposal. Your writing can always benefit from another pair of eyes.

Is the information presented in the proposal factually correct?

Reviewers are often experts in your field. They know the facts, or at least where to find them.

Be sure that the information in your proposal is accurate. If you need to speculate or estimate, use language that clearly makes that distinction, and provide data or logic as support.  

Describe the Relevance

A funder wants to know how your project aligns with their mission and vision. They want to feel confident that your project will help them and the cause they support.

To win over the funder, you want to clearly explain how your project matches their needs, outcomes, and financial backing.

How does your project goal align with the funder’s goal?

Your goals must match the funder’s goals. Your project must aim to fulfill the need or solve the problem that the funder wants to address. In your proposal, clearly explain how your goals align to accomplish the same vision.

How does your project fit within the scope of the funder’s call?

Similar to the goals, you want your objectives to match the funder’s objectives. If you find that your objectives are slightly different, you might be able to pivot the direction of your project. And if your project is a larger undertaking than the funder will support, you could consider reducing its scope.

Why you are requesting funds?

The funder will want to know why you need funding. Do you need to buy equipment or reagents? Do you need to hire staff or secure more lab space? Be clear about how you will spend the award.

When creating your budget, be clear about how you will spend the award. And make sure that the funder supports how you plan to use the award. Some awards only cover things like purchasing equipment. Others won’t support salaries or overhead costs.

Emphasize the Significance

You know that your work is important. But a reviewer many not understand the value of your project unless you explain it.

Teach your reviewer why your project is important. And reiterate its value throughout your proposal.

What is the problem or need you want to address?

Early in your proposal, explain the problem or need you want to address and why it needs to be solved. While the reviewer may already know these details, your explanation is an opportunity to showcase your expertise and insight into an important topic.

What is the value gained by solving that problem or need?

Similarly, the reviewer will likely know the value of solving the problem or need. But by explaining it in your own words, you can show your reviewer that you understand the benefits of addressing that problem or need.

How will your project help to solve that problem or need?

In your proposal, you want to clearly state how your project will contribute to solving the need you are tackling. Keep in mind that your project doesn’t have to completely solve the problem. But it must contribute to solving it. In this case, you still want to explain the full scope of your vision, which will show the reviewer that you are serious, organized, and likely to succeed.

How will your project contribute to your field?

Your project should contribute to your field. Will you create new technology that other researchers can use? Will you change a standard of care for patients? Will you develop a program that exposes students to careers in science and medicine?

Explain these details to the reviewer. Share how your work could contribute to a larger purpose.  

Explain the Approach

These questions will influence the meat of your proposal. In the first set of questions, you explain why your project is important. Here, you dive into how you will complete that project.

What is your approach to addressing the problem or need?

A key part of your proposal is explaining how you will tackle the objectives of your project. What methods will you use? When will you use them? Who will use them? Where will they be used?

Be specific. Provide more details than you think you need. If your proposal becomes too long, you can delete unnecessary information in later drafts. 

How do all of the key elements of your approach work?

By explaining how your methods work, you can accomplish two important tasks. First, if the reviewer is not familiar with the methods you will use, you can teach them how they work. Second, you can show your reviewer that you have thought about your methods carefully. In this way, you will highlight your knowledge and skills, making your reviewer feel more confident that your project will be successful.

What do you need to carry out your approach?

Along with explaining why you need funding, you also want to describe what you need to complete your project. Will you need to develop a new cell line? Will you need to create a survey? Will you need to work with a certain patient population?

Outline these needs and describe how you will attain them. Get letters of support from collaborators or organizations who will help you fulfill those needs. These details will show your reviewer that your project is well planned and more likely to succeed.

What is the quality of your approach?

The reviewer will want to know that your approach involves quality methods. Will you use the latest technology? Has the method been used in other successful projects?

Explain the rationale for why you chose your approach. Support your rationale with evidence (e.g., literature, logic, letters of support) that shows your approach will be effective.

What is the feasibility of carrying out your approach?

Do you have the right equipment? Do you have enough staff? The funder wants to know that you have the resources to complete your project, or that their funding will help you get those resources.

Funders can get some of this information through ancillary documents in your application. But you can also supplement your proposal with letters of support from anyone who might help with your project, such as a collaborator or core facility.

How will you measure outcomes and success?

The outcomes of your project must be measurable. You need a tangible way to show that your project is successful.

In your proposal, outline exactly what you will measure. Be specific and explain how those measurements will help you achieve your objectives and goals.

Highlight the Expertise 

While this is the last category, it is an important one. These topics should permeate your proposal, reiterating that your project—and you—will be successful.

How are you qualified to complete the project?

Your reviewer must feel confident that you are capable of completing this project. Do you have the proper training? Do you have the necessary experience? Have you successfully completed projects of a similar scope?

If you are a well-established researcher, funders can often find this information in your CV. However, if you are new to your field, you may need to boost your qualifications with some added support. Complete trainings in approaches you will use in your project. Hire staff that are experts in the techniques you will use. Find collaborators who have a successful track record. These things will help your reviewer see that you are serious and dedicated.

Who will contribute to your project?

The funder will want to know everyone who will be involved in your project, what they will do, and how they are qualified to do it.

Describe all staff and collaborators that will work on the project. Include letters of support and CVs for key personnel. If you will need to hire staff, draft descriptions of what they will do and what qualifications they will need.

What literature or preliminary work supports your project?

Be sure that you are well versed in the literature related to your project. Include research that supports all aspects of your project: the background, the significance, your rationale, your approach.

Do your research. Avoid saying things like, “To our knowledge, no one has done this before.” This language suggests that you may not be up to date or fully knowledgeable in your field, which instills doubt in your reviewer’s mind. You want your reviewer to feel confident that you are an expert in your field.

Want free tools and templates to help you enhance your scientific and medical writing? Get access to our free writing toolkit!

Crystal is an editor, educator, coach, and speaker who helps scientists and clinicians communicate with clear, concise, and compelling writing. You can follow her on LinkedIn .

10 Tricks to Reduce Your Word Count in Academic Writing

5 ways to build confidence in writing with your non-native language.

• How It Works
• Prices & Discounts

What are the Elements of a Good Research Proposal

Table of contents

Are you a Ph.D. candidate gearing up for a research project? Hold on before you proceed; submitting an impressive research proposal is one of the biggest challenges you must overcome. While many students are prepared to undertake the research study, very few are well-versed in writing research proposals.

You might wonder why they even matter in the first place. Well, research proposals give professors an indication of your thought process, the originality of your ideas, and how passionate you are about the subject.

A research proposal is your tool to convince them about the project's feasibility and make them believe you can take it forward.

Ultimate Checklist for Writing a Strong Ph.D. Research Proposal

Developing a solid research proposal requires meticulous planning, clarity of thought, attention to detail, and exceptional writing skills. Wondering how to begin? Here are seven essential elements that you must include in your research proposal to succeed.

Introduction

The introductory paragraph in a Ph.D. paper needs to set the context for the research. Also known as the ‘abstract,’ it introduces the reader to the subject you are researching on. This is where you include the background information required to drive interest in your area of study and also explain why you thought it was worth pursuing. You can also briefly touch upon your research methodology, which can be elaborated on later.

Think of the introduction as the trailer of a movie – it needs to be succinct and clear enough for your professor/supervisor to see the significance of conducting the research and be invested in it.

Literature Review

A literature review in a Doctoral paper is an essential component as it shows how much knowledge you possess in the area of study. You need to include all the statistical data and evidence available to strengthen the significance of the research and connect it with the larger scheme of things in your discipline.

Use this space to mention the previous research that has been done on your topic and identify existing gaps – this shows the extent of your research and eye for detail.

Considering the amount of data students need to grapple with in this section, it is important only to highlight the relevant details and not go off-track.

You have set the context and identified gaps in the existing studies on the topic. Now, you need to highlight the objective of YOUR research study. Basically, what is it that you want to achieve out of this study?

The objective needs to be followed by the research questions or hypothesis of the study. Questions refer to the points you ask about the particular topic or problem, while hypotheses are proposed explanations based on your set of assumptions.

Remember to be as detailed, realistic, and specific as possible in this section.

Research Methodology

Once all the theoretical knowledge and data have been put in place, you can explain how you intend to carry out the research. This is another crucial section, as your methodology needs to be projected logically and feasibly to be considered worthy enough.

Use this space to explain your research method and analysis techniques in-depth. This must predominantly outline how you plan to collect data, the population and sample size you are considering, and the methods you use to analyze this data.

Limitations

Every research study is bound to have limitations, and addressing them in your proposal shows that you have given them a thought. Acknowledging limitations is more like describing the challenges or hurdles you might encounter during the study.

From selection bias and insufficient sample size to limited access to data or tools to conduct the research – these are all potential weaknesses of your study and must be mentioned.

While writing about limitations, it is important to describe how they impact your findings and, if possible, also suggest possible alternatives.

To evaluate the feasibility of the study, professors will also need to know how much time you require to complete it.

Hence, irrespective of whether you are asked, it is always wise to provide a timetable that outlines deadlines for every step involved in the study until the research paper is written. It’s essential to look back at your methodology and commit to realistic timelines so you are not racing against time later.

Bibliography

Similar to every piece of academic writing, even research proposals need to end with an accurate bibliography. You must credit the original sources and enlist all the books, websites, and other reference materials you have referred to for writing the proposal.

Citing references strengthens your arguments and also defends you from plagiarism allegations.

Developing a Ph.D. research proposal is complicated, and as it forms the first impression of your study, it is certainly not something you can take lightly. If you are too busy to get started or are questioning your writing skills, we at Writers Per Hour can come to your rescue.

Our team of writers are experts at writing research proposals and can help you submit an impressive piece of work that will get your work noticed and accepted. So, buy a research proposal from us today and get a custom-written one delivered right on time!

Share this article

Achieve Academic Success with Expert Assistance!

Crafted from Scratch for You.

Ensuring Your Work’s Originality.

Transform Your Draft into Excellence.

Perfecting Your Paper’s Grammar, Style, and Format (APA, MLA, etc.).

Calculate the cost of your paper

Get ideas for your essay