*Rates based on the FICO Loan Savings Calculator , which assumes one discount point .
Lenders not only verify employment through a buyer's pay stubs but will likely call the employer to confirm a borrower's employment and salary.
Self-employed buyers provide additional information such as the stability of the borrower’s income, the location and nature of the business, the financial strength of the business, and the ability of the business to continue generating and distributing sufficient income to enable the borrower to make the payments on the mortgage.
Personal documents and identification required for pre-approval include the borrower's driver's license, Social Security number, and authorization to allow the lender to pull a credit report .
A lender is required to provide a document called a loan estimate within three business days of receiving a completed mortgage application. It outlines the pre-approved loan amount and maximum loan amount, terms and type of mortgage, interest rate, estimated interest and payments, estimated closing costs, an estimate of property taxes, and homeowner’s insurance.
The loan file will eventually transfer to a loan underwriter who will also ensure that the borrower meets the guidelines for the specific loan program to determine full approval. If nothing has changed in the buyer's financial situation since pre-approval, the buyer and lender can then move forward with the closing of the loan. Final loan approval occurs when the buyer has an appraisal completed for the home and the loan is applied to the property.
After reviewing a mortgage application, a lender will provide a decision to pre-approve, deny, or pre-approve with conditions. These conditions may require the borrower to provide extra documentation or reduce existing debt to meet the lending guidelines. If denied, the lender should explain and offer options to improve a borrower's chances for pre-approval.
Getting pre-approved for a mortgage is best before you start looking for houses as it helps determine a maximum loan approval amount. Pre-approval also determines obstacles like excessive debt or poor credit scores.
Getting pre-approved for a mortgage gives a home buyer bargaining power since they already have mortgage financing and can therefore make a reasonable offer to the seller of a home in which they are interested. Otherwise, the prospective buyer would have to apply for a mortgage before making an offer and potentially lose the opportunity to bid on a home.
The loan-to-value (LTV) ratio is an assessment of lending risk that financial institutions and other lenders examine before approving a mortgage and compares the loan value to the market value of the property. Typically, loan assessments with high LTV ratios are considered higher-risk loans. Therefore, if the mortgage is approved, the loan has a higher interest rate.
The debt-to-income (DTI) ratio is the percentage of your gross monthly income that goes to paying your monthly debt payments and is used by lenders to determine your borrowing risk.
Mortgage pre-approval is an examination of a home buyer's finances and lenders require five items to ensure borrowers will repay their loan. Potential borrowers complete a mortgage application and provide proof of assets, confirmation of income, credit report, employment verification, and important documentation to obtain pre-approval.
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. " Exploring Loan Choices ."
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. “ VA Home Loans .”
Fannie Mae. “ Loan-Level Price Adjustment Matrix ,” Page 2.
U.S. Bank. “ Mortgage Loan Process .”
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. " What Is Private Mortgage Insurance? "
My FICO. " Home Purchase Center ."
My FICO. " How Your FICO Score Can Affect an FHA Loan ."
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. “ Buying a House: Explore interest rates .”
My FICO. " Loan Savings Calculator ."
Fannie Mae. " B3-3.2-01, Underwriting Factors and Documentation for a Self-Employed Borrower (12/04/2018) ."
Century 21. " How Far In Advance Should I Get Pre-Approved for a Mortgage? "
NEW YORK, NY--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Gannett Co., Inc. (“Gannett”, “we”, “our”, or the “Company”) (NYSE: GCI) announced today it has entered into a commitment letter for a comprehensive debt refinancing that is expected to extend our debt maturities and significantly reduce future dilution from the Company’s 6.0% Senior Secured Convertible Notes due 2027 (the “2027 Notes”).
The commitment letter provides for a new senior secured credit facility (the “Term Loan Facility”) with funds managed by affiliates of Apollo (NYSE: APO) (“Apollo Funds”) of up to $900 million, to be comprised of an initial term loan facility of approximately $675 million (the “Initial Term Facility”), to be funded at the time of closing, and a delayed draw term loan facility of approximately $225 million (the “Delayed Draw Facility”), which will be available at the Company’s discretion at closing and during the six months following closing, subject to certain customary funding conditions. Net proceeds from the Term Loan Facility will be used to repay in full the outstanding principal of the Company’s five-year senior secured term loan facility maturing October 15, 2026, to purchase or redeem the 6.0% first lien notes due November 1, 2026 (the “2026 Notes”) and to repurchase for cash up to 50% of the outstanding 2027 Notes. The Term Loan Facility will mature five years after the closing date and will bear interest at an annual rate equal to SOFR plus a margin of 5.0% with a floor of 150 basis points.
Gannett intends to make an offer to the holders of outstanding 2026 Notes for, at the election of holders, cash consideration at a price of $1,000 for each $1,000 principal amount of 2026 Notes tendered or loans under the Term Loan Facility on a par-for-par basis. As part of these overall transactions, the Apollo Funds have agreed to tender for cash all the 2026 Notes held by such Apollo Funds (having an aggregate principal amount of approximately $81 million) in the exchange offer. The proceeds of the Delayed Draw Facility may be used to repurchase any additional 2026 Notes that are tendered for cash at the time of closing in connection with the exchange offer or to later redeem the outstanding balance of the 2026 Notes in accordance with the terms of the indenture for the 2026 Notes.
In addition, as part of the refinancing transactions, Apollo Funds have agreed to exchange approximately $441 million principal amount of 2027 Notes, with 50% of the aggregate principal amount to be exchanged for cash at a rate of $1,110 per $1,000 principal amount of 2027 Notes and 50% of the aggregate principal amount to be exchanged for new 6.0% Senior Secured Convertible Notes due 2031 (the “2031 Notes”) and otherwise having substantially similar terms to the existing notes. Gannett may redeem up to 30% of the outstanding principal amount of the 2031 Notes at a redemption price of 140% prior to December 1, 2030 (or, under certain circumstances, prior to December 1, 2028). Subject to applicable law, Gannett may repurchase and exchange additional 2027 Notes in individually negotiated, private transactions.
The transactions are expected to close later this fall, subject to any required approvals and customary closing conditions. Other than the tender and exchange transactions with Apollo Funds, there can be no assurance that the exchange offer for the 2026 Notes or that any offer we make to repurchase and exchange any 2027 Notes will be successful.
“This committed plan of refinancing is a significant milestone and the next step on our path towards anticipated sustainable long-term growth and value creation,” said Michael Reed, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. “We believe our ability to successfully refinance our existing facilities, while extending the term loan maturity date to 2029 and significantly reducing the future impact of the 2027 Notes, reflects Gannett's long-term strategy and the progress made against the strategy from an execution standpoint. We believe this refinancing shows Apollo's commitment to being an excellent partner to Gannett, especially as it relates to our capital structure. We believe this new financing gives the Company generous runway to repay its debt, and the reduced future dilution from the convertible notes is expected to be significant for our shareholders. We believe this transaction announced today creates the time and flexibility for further investment in growth in order to achieve our transformation and fully unlock value for our shareholders.”
Apollo Partner and Head of Portfolio Strategy Robert Givone said, “We continue to be supportive of Gannett. We believe this comprehensive refinancing will enable Gannett to further strengthen its balance sheet and enhance its financial flexibility, and that the transactions demonstrate the creative capital solutions that Apollo is able to provide to great companies.”
About Gannett
Gannett Co., Inc. (NYSE: GCI) is a diversified media company with expansive reach at the national and local level dedicated to empowering and enriching communities. We seek to inspire, inform, and connect audiences as a sustainable, growth focused media and digital marketing solutions company. We endeavor to deliver essential content, marketing solutions, and experiences for curated audiences, advertisers, consumers, and stakeholders by leveraging our diverse teams and suite of products to enrich the local communities and businesses we serve. Our current portfolio of trusted media brands includes the USA TODAY NETWORK, comprised of the national publication, USA TODAY, and local media organizations in the United States, and Newsquest, a wholly-owned subsidiary operating in the United Kingdom. Our digital marketing solutions brand, LocaliQ, uses innovation and software to enable small and medium-sized businesses to grow, and USA TODAY NETWORK Ventures, our events division, creates impactful consumer engagements, promotions, and races.
Our website address is www.gannett.com. We use our website as a channel of distribution for important company information, including press releases and other news and presentations, which is accessible on the Investor Relations and News and Events subpages of our website.
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Certain items in this press release may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including statements regarding our ability to enhance our capital structure and refinance our debt facilities, maturity of debt, dilution, tender offers, note repurchases, exchanges and redemptions, availability of future financing, interest expenses, long-term growth and value creation, investments in growth, our partnerships, our runway and ability to repay debt, our transformation and shareholder value. Words such as "expect(s)", "will", “believe(s)”, “anticipate(s)” and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These statements are based on management’s current expectations and beliefs and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. These and other risks and uncertainties could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements, many of which are beyond our control. The Company can give no assurance its expectations regarding the proposed financing and liability management transactions, or otherwise, will be attained. Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements contained in this press release. For a discussion of some of the risks and important factors that could cause actual results to differ from such forward-looking statements, see the risks and other factors detailed from time to time in the Company’s 2023 Annual Report on Form 10-K, and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Furthermore, new risks and uncertainties emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for the Company to predict or assess the impact of every factor that may cause its actual results to differ from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this press release. Except to the extent required by law, the Company expressly disclaims any obligation to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in the Company’s expectations with regard thereto or change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any statement is based.
For investor inquiries, contact: Matt Esposito Investor Relations 703-854-3000 [email protected]
For media inquiries, contact: Lark-Marie Anton Chief Communications Officer 646-906-4087 [email protected]
Go to: Pre-adoption Certificates | New and Expectant Parents | Types of Certificates
For the fastest service, order certified copies online through VitalChek , which is the only vendor authorized by the Health Department to process birth certificate orders.
To order or correct a marriage certificate, visit the Office of the City Clerk .
You can order a birth certificate online, by mail or in person . You cannot order by email. We recommend ordering online through VitalChek , which is the fastest way to receive your certificate.
You may apply for a New York City birth certificate if:
If you were born outside of New York City, including elsewhere in New York State, the CDC has information on how you can order a certificate .
For more information on applying , see Birth and Death Records: How to Apply
Each certificate costs $15, and may have an additional processing fee. For more information on fees, see Birth and Death Records: Fees .
There are two types of birth certificates:
The following application is required for all orders of both short and long forms:
If you are unable to schedule an appointment and have an emergency request related to travel, health care coverage, government services, military, housing or employment, call 311 or email [email protected] . In your email, include current photo ID and documents showing that you have an emergency, such as a paid plane ticket, letter from an employer with a job start date, or letter from a government agency with an appointment date. You will receive an email confirming whether your in-person emergency appointment to purchase the birth certificate is approved.
Parents receive a free birth certificate for newborns about four weeks after birth. Your baby's birth certificate will be based on information you provide at the hospital when you deliver. It will be automatically mailed to the parents listed on the certificate.
At the hospital, you will be asked to fill out a Mother/Parent Worksheet (PDF). You can complete this ahead of time and bring it to the hospital or give it to your midwife. The worksheet collects important information and helps your baby get a Social Security Card.
Be careful when you fill out your baby’s full name and your mailing address. Correcting a birth certificate can cost money or even require a trip to court. A mistake in the mailing address can delay delivery.
Married parents, regardless of sex, have the right to have both their names on their child's birth certificate. Some hospitals require proof of marriage. Check with the hospital to find out if you need to bring a copy of your marriage license with you.
An Acknowledgment of Parentage is a document that unmarried parents must both sign voluntarily to establish the child's legal father/parent.
Certified copies of an Acknowledgment of Parentage are free of charge. Complete the New York State Acknowledgment of Parentage application and submit by mail or in person.
For questions about certificates for newborns (born within the past 30 days),call 646-632-6563 or email [email protected] .
There is no fee to add a child's given name to a birth certificate if you submit the application within 60 days of birth.
You may add a given name and submit corrections if you find missing or incorrect information at the hospital. There is no fee for changes made by the hospital if sent within 12 months of birth.
Once the baby is named, it is official. Changing a baby's name may require you to go to court and pay applicable fees. Visit the certificate corrections page for more details.
How to Obtain an Apostille on a NYC Birth Certificate
Step 1: Get the Long Form Birth Certificate or Death Certificate with a Letter of Exemplification.
Step 2: Authentication by the County Clerk.
Step 3: Acquiring the Apostille or Certificate of Authentication.
Attorney Request
An attorney requesting a birth certificate on behalf of a registrant, registrant's mother or registrant's father/parent (if named on the certificate) can order a birth certificate. To submit a request, an attorney must:
The information on the forms must match the Birth Certificate record on file.
Ordering a Deceased Person's Birth Certificate
Orders can only be made by mail.
Ordering an Existing Acknowledgement of Parentage (AOP)
Certified copies of an existing acknowledgment of parentage are available for free. Complete the Application for a Copy of an Acknowledgment of Parentage (PDF) form and submit your request by mail or in person. You must include a copy of your current photo identification.
All in-person orders require an appointment. Click here to schedule an appointment online . If you schedule an appointment and make your request in person, you may be able to walk away with a certified copy of the acknowledgement of parentage that same day.
Send mail requests to:
Office of Vital Records 125 Worth Street, Room 119 New York, NY 10013
Non-Profit Organization Request
Non-profit groups that provide services to minor children or developmentally disabled adults may get birth and death certificates on behalf of their clients through a mailed application. For instructions on how to make this request, email the following to [email protected] :
Pre-1910 Birth Certificates
To request a birth record from before 1910, order online through the NYC Department of Records and Information Services Municipal Archives website or call 311 .
If that agency is unable to locate your record, email [email protected] .
Certificate Security Features
As of 2019, NYC birth and death certificates no longer have a raised seal. The certificates are issued on certified paper that includes numerous security features that ensures the integrity and acceptance of the certificates. Refer to the back of the certificate, which describes several of these security features in detail.
Pre-adoption Certificates
For information on requesting a pre-adoption birth certificate, see Birth and Death Records: Pre-Adoption Certificates .
Try the Recipe Analyzer to measure any dish’s nutritional value.
AARP daily Crossword Puzzle
Hotels with AARP discounts
Life Insurance
AARP Dental Insurance Plans
Join AARP for just $9 per year with a 5-year membership and get a FREE Gift!
Get instant access to members-only products, hundreds of discounts, a free second membership, and a subscription to AARP the Magazine.
Work & Jobs
Social Security
Conditions & Treatments
Drugs & Supplements
Health Care & Coverage
Health Benefits
AARP Hearing Center
Advice on Tinnitus and Hearing Loss
Get Happier
Creating Social Connections
Brain Health Resources
Tools and Explainers on Brain Health
Your Health
8 Major Health Risks for People 50+
Scams & Fraud
Personal Finance
Money Benefits
View and Report Scams in Your Area
AARP Foundation Tax-Aide
Free Tax Preparation Assistance
AARP Money Map
Get Your Finances Back on Track
How to Protect What You Collect
Small Business
Age Discrimination
Flexible Work
Freelance Jobs You Can Do From Home
AARP Skills Builder
Online Courses to Boost Your Career
31 Great Ways to Boost Your Career
ON-DEMAND WEBINARS
Tips to Enhance Your Job Search
Get More out of Your Benefits
When to Start Taking Social Security
10 Top Social Security FAQs
Social Security Benefits Calculator
Medicare Made Easy
Original vs. Medicare Advantage
Enrollment Guide
Step-by-Step Tool for First-Timers
Prescription Drugs
9 Biggest Changes Under New Rx Law
Medicare FAQs
Quick Answers to Your Top Questions
Care at Home
Financial & Legal
Life Balance
LONG-TERM CARE
Understanding Basics of LTC Insurance
State Guides
Assistance and Services in Your Area
Prepare to Care Guides
How to Develop a Caregiving Plan
End of Life
How to Cope With Grief, Loss
Recently Played
Word & Trivia
Atari® & Retro
Members Only
Staying Sharp
Mobile Apps
More About Games
Right Again! Trivia
Right Again! Trivia – Sports
Atari® Video Games
Throwback Thursday Crossword
Travel Tips
Vacation Ideas
Destinations
Travel Benefits
Beach Vacation Ideas
Fun Beach Vacations
Road Trips For Every Personality
Passport Access
Passports Can Be Renewed Online
AARP National Park Guide
Black Canyon of the Gunnison
Entertainment & Style
Family & Relationships
Personal Tech
Home & Living
Celebrities
Beauty & Style
Movies for Grownups
Summer Movie Preview
Jon Bon Jovi’s Long Journey Back
Looking Back
50 World Changers Turning 50
Sex & Dating
7 Dating Dos and 7 Don'ts
Friends & Family
Veterinarians May Use AI to Treat Pets
Home Technology
Caregiver’s Guide to Smart Home Tech
Virtual Community Center
Join Free Tech Help Events
Creative Ways to Store Your Pets Gear
Meals to Make in the Microwave
Wearing Shoes Inside: Pros vs. Cons
Driver Safety
Maintenance & Safety
Trends & Technology
AARP Smart Guide
How to Clean Your Car
We Need To Talk
Assess Your Loved One's Driving Skills
AARP Smart Driver Course
Building Resilience in Difficult Times
Tips for Finding Your Calm
Weight Loss After 50 Challenge
Cautionary Tales of Today's Biggest Scams
7 Top Podcasts for Armchair Travelers
Jean Chatzky: ‘Closing the Savings Gap’
Quick Digest of Today's Top News
AARP Top Tips for Navigating Life
Get Moving With Our Workout Series
You are now leaving AARP.org and going to a website that is not operated by AARP. A different privacy policy and terms of service will apply.
Go to Series Main Page
Brought to you by
Open Enrollment
Medicare Open Enrollment Ends on Dec. 7
It's time to check your coverage
7 Medicare Changes You Can Expect in 2025
Lower drug costs, coverage changes and new benefits
10 Things Medicare Doesn’t Cover
You’ll need to plan ahead to pay for some common medical expenses
10 Things to Know About Medigap Plans
Your guide to buying Medicare supplemental health insurance
How Much Do You Know About Medicare?
Take this quiz and discover how knowledgeable you are about the health insurance program
Taking Stock
Medicare Open Enrollment: Everything You Need to Know
When it starts, when it ends, and how it works for original Medicare and Medicare Advantage
How Much Does Medicare Cost?
Monthly premiums, other out-of-pocket expenses can add up
Understanding Medicare’s Options: Parts A, B, C and D
Making sense of the alphabet soup of health care choices
12 Things Free Under Medicare
Vaccines, screenings, counseling and more
The Big Choice: Original Medicare vs. Medicare Advantage
Which path you take will determine how you get your medical care — and how much it costs
How to Sign Up: A Guide to Medicare Enrollment
When you can enroll for health coverage, the best ways to do it and how to avoid penalties
What Is Medicare?
How the federal health insurance program covers seniors and people with disabilities
5 Steps to Help You Sign Up for Medicare Benefits
When to enroll and what decisions you need to make
10 Things You Didn’t Know About Medicare
How the program works for older adults and those with disabilities
When 9 Biggest Medicare Changes Under New Rx Law Go Into Effect
A year-by-year implementation timeline of the Inflation Reduction Act’s health provisions
Follow the Rules
10 Common Medicare Mistakes to Avoid
Errors can prove costly to new enrollees
What You Need to Know About Part D Prescription Drug Plans
How to make sure that the medicines you take are covered by the plan you choose
How to Get Help Paying for Medicare
Savings programs can help cover premiums, copays and deductibles
Getting Coverage
Medicare Eligibility: Age, Qualifications, Requirements
Here are the requirements to be eligible for health care coverage
7 Ways to avoid higher medicare premiums
Major life events can exempt enrollees from surcharges
Expensive medications you’ll save thousands. dementia or mental health care more options.
Kimberly Lankford,
You can thank the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 for some of the biggest Medicare changes in the past few years — including a welcome reprieve from the high costs of prescription drugs.
Join AARP for just $9 per year with a 5-year membership and get a FREE Gift!
Among the changes:
In 2023 , Medicare capped covered insulin costs in Part D prescription drug plans at $35 a month and eliminated out-of-pocket costs for recommended vaccines.
In 2024, the government expanded eligibility for financial assistance from the Part D Extra Help program and announced results Aug. 15 of negotiations to reduce the costs of 10 of Medicare’s most expensive drugs . Those prices will take effect in 2026.
One of the biggest changes takes effect in 2025, when Part D plans must cap out-of-pocket spending on covered drugs at $2,000 a year. That change will have a ripple effect on Part D and Medicare Advantage plans’ other costs and coverage, making it especially important to review your options during open enrollment this year.
The Part D rules overshadow other Medicare changes that can make a difference in 2025, including Medicare Advantage midyear coverage notices and stricter marketing rules, expanded benefits for family caregivers and access to more mental health providers.
The $2,000-a-year out-of-pocket limit for prescription medications applies to stand-alone Medicare Part D policies and drug coverage in Medicare Advantage plans.
“It’s the first time in the history of the Medicare program that people have a cap on how much they could have to pay out of pocket,” Meena Seshamani, M.D., the director of the federal Center for Medicare, said in an interview with AARP. “And such a significant change means that in open enrollment, it is so important to shop. Because with such big changes, there very well could be a plan that better suits your health and financial needs.”
The $2,000 cap includes deductibles, copayments and coinsurance for covered drugs. It doesn’t apply to premiums or to drugs a plan doesn’t cover.
“It doesn’t apply to their Part B drugs,” such as injections they get at their doctor’s office, says Gretchen Jacobson, vice president of Medicare for the Commonwealth Fund. The amount of the cap can be adjusted in subsequent years if Part D costs rise.
This change simplifies the way Part D works. Before 2025, plans had four coverage phases.
In 2025, Part D plans can have a deductible up to $590. Then you pay copayments for your medications until your total out-of-pocket costs reach $2,000.
The cap is expected to help millions of people. By April 1, 2024, more than 1.7 million people, about 3.5 percent of people covered in drug plans, had already reached $2,000 in out-of-pocket costs on their prescriptions, according to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). More certainly will surpass that by the end of the year.
People with high drug costs tend to pay a lot at the beginning of a year. The Medicare Prescription Payment Plan will let enrollees opt to pay their prescription costs monthly rather than all at once.
“This will enable people to spread out the out-of-pocket drug costs over the course of the year so that you don’t experience that sticker shock and those cash flow issues at the pharmacy,” Seshamani says.
The payment plan doesn’t reduce the total cost, but it can help with budgeting. You can opt into the plan by contacting your Part D company.
The caveat. “There was some concern that changes in the Medicare Part D benefit design that lower costs for beneficiaries, like the $2,000 cap, would lead to higher premiums for 2025,” says Tricia Neuman, executive director for KFF’s program on Medicare policy. The $2,000 cap doesn’t include premiums.
“The Inflation Reduction Act included a 6 percent cap on base Part D premiums, but the cap does not apply to the total premium that individual plans may charge,” she says. Part D plans will have to cover a larger share of the costs beyond the cap. Drug manufacturers and Medicare also contribute to the cost beyond the cap.
The 2025 Part D base premium is $36.78, but actual premiums vary depending on your location and plan.
“They [CMS officials] don’t want beneficiaries to have to end up paying more in premiums because they get a cap on their out-of-pocket expenses,” the Commonwealth Fund’s Jacobson says.
The bottom line: You may see a big variation in premiums, copayments and covered drugs during open enrollment this year. Look at the annual notice of change that your plan must send in September outlining changes to your plan for 2025.
Starting Oct. 1, you can compare coverage and costs for all the plans in your area using the Medicare Plan Finder and choose a 2025 plan during open enrollment from Oct. 15 to Dec. 7. You can get help for free from your State Health Insurance Assistance Program (SHIP).
AARP NEWSLETTERS
%{ newsLetterPromoText }%
%{ description }%
Privacy Policy
ARTICLE CONTINUES AFTER ADVERTISEMENT
Medicare is prohibited from covering drugs prescribed specifically for weight loss . But Part D plans can cover popular weight loss drugs when they’re ordered for other purposes, such as Ozempic and Mounjaro for type 2 diabetes.
In March, the Food and Drug Administration approved Wegovy for people with cardiovascular disease who are overweight. Few Part D plans added the drug to their approved lists because they can’t change premiums midyear.
AARP® Vision Plans from VSP™
Vision insurance plans designed for members and their families
“I looked at 83 stand-alone Part D plans and 235 Medicare Advantage plans in four cities, and only two plans covered Wegovy,” says Diane Omdahl, author of Medicare for You: A Smart Person’s Guide. She’s president of 65 Incorporated in Mequon, Wisconsin, which helps people with Medicare decisions.
However, you may find more weight loss drugs covered in 2025.
“We estimate that roughly 1 in 4 Medicare beneficiaries with obesity or who are overweight could be eligible for Wegovy to reduce the risk of serious heart disease,” Neuman says. “On the one hand, Wegovy is likely to be subject to relatively high cost-sharing because of its high price, but on the other hand, Part D enrollees who take these drugs will benefit from having the new $2,000 cap on their drug expenses.”
Part D plans can expand coverage as the FDA approves other uses for weight loss drugs.
Medicare does not cover Zepbound (tirzepatide) because the FDA has approved it only for weight loss. If the agency OKs tirzepatide for treatment of moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea and obesity, which pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly requested, Part D plans could cover the drug for that purpose.
The $2,000 out-of-pocket spending cap applies to deductibles, copayments and coinsurance in the prescription drug portion of Medicare Advantage plans.
Medicare Advantage plans may make changes in 2025 to help cover their additional expenses. They are less likely than Part D plans to adjust premiums, especially if they charge nothing in addition to the Part B premium , says Meredith Freed, senior policy manager with KFF’s program on Medicare policy.
No extra premium? Probably safe. “The zero-dollar premium is really attractive to people and one of the easiest ways to compare across plans,” she says. But a plan may change its formulary , which is its list of covered drugs; reduce its out-of-pocket maximum spending limit; increase the percentage you pay for some services, called coinsurance; or reduce some of the extra benefits that drew you to the plan in the first place.
“If you still have a dental benefit, for example, maybe it’s a little less generous than in prior years,” Freed says.
The devil’s in the details . Review your plan’s annual notice of change carefully. Don’t just rely on the general description of coverage in the Medicare Plan Finder when comparing Medicare Advantage plans.
Look at the details in the Explanation of Benefits on the plan’s website before making a final decision. Also reconfirm that your providers are in the plan’s network.
LIMITED TIME OFFER: Labor Day Sale!
Join AARP for just $9 per year with a 5-year membership and get a FREE Gift! Get instant access to members-only products and hundreds of discounts, a free second membership, and a subscription to AARP The Magazine.
This will matter to Medicare beneficiaries who have chosen Advantage plans instead of original Medicare, 50.4 percent as of April 2024. The midyear statement will show available benefits that you haven’t used — important since those extras are often what persuades a Medicare enrollee to sign up with a particular plan.
“For example, if they haven’t used any of their dental, vision, hearing or fitness benefits, plans are required to notify them if they have any benefits left,” Jacobson says.
You’ll continue to see more realistic TV ads from Medicare Advantage plans, the private insurance alternative to original Medicare. Rules that took effect last year before open enrollment prohibited Medicare Advantage ads from mentioning benefits not available in the area where the ad appears. The ads also can’t mislead you into thinking you’re contacting a government employee when you call with questions.
A program for dementia patients and their caregivers that launched this year will quadruple in 2025, serving more of the country.
The program, called Guiding an Improved Dementia Experience (GUIDE), provides a 24/7 support line, a care navigator to find medical services and community-based assistance, caregiver training and up to $2,500 a year for at-home, overnight or adult day care respite services. Patients and their caregivers typically won’t have copayments.
Adding 294 to original 96 . CMS selected 96 organizations to participate starting July 1, 2024, including academic medical centers, hospitals, small and large group practices and community-based organizations already providing programs for dementia patients. The agency chose 294 organizations to join next July.
“We’re very excited about this,” says Janet LeClair, CEO of Memory & Movement Charlotte (North Carolina), a nonprofit medical practice that has focused on dementia patients for 11 years. “The caregiver is really the pivotal person ensuring the quality of life of the patients.”
Important criteria. Participants must be enrolled in original Medicare and have a dementia diagnosis. They can’t be in hospice or a nursing home.
“We know intuitively that respite is so critical to the health and well-being of the caregiver, which directly correlates to the health and wellness of the patient,” LeClair says.
To see if a program is available in your area, go to the CMS GUIDE program fact sheet and the link to the CMS Innovation website . Click GUIDE Model in the drop-down models list | Display selected .
Programs that will begin in July 2025 are listed. Contact the program to learn more about eligibility and request an assessment.
Although the percentage of adults 65 and older reporting they used mental health services increased by only 1 point to 20 percent from 2019 to 2022, according to a KFF study , access to care may have affected those numbers.
Before this year, licensed marriage and family therapists, mental health counselors and addiction counselors couldn’t bill Medicare because they weren’t allowed to enroll as Medicare providers. Now they can, and some have.
A paperwork process. “But it’s not just automatic. There are steps they need to take,” Freed says.
Medicare Advantage plans must meet stricter standards to improve access to behavioral health specialists.
“We’ve had such tremendous excitement and interest with tens of thousands of clinicians enrolling in the Medicare program, which will make a big difference for access to care,” Seshamani says. More than 400,000 behavioral health clinicians nationwide are eligible, but you’ll need to ask any provider you seek if they accept Medicare.
Positive development: Even though many telehealth expansions that took effect during the COVID-19 pandemic will expire at the end of 2024, Medicare permanently expanded access to telemedicine for behavioral health services. That can help with access to providers, especially in rural areas.
Kimberly Lankford is a contributing writer who covers Medicare and personal finance. She wrote about insurance, Medicare, retirement and taxes for more than 20 years at Kiplinger’s Personal Finance and has written for The Washington Post and Boston Globe . She received the personal finance Best in Business award from the Society of American Business Editors and Writers and the New York State Society of CPAs’ excellence in financial journalism award for her guide to Medicare.
Unlock Access to AARP Members Edition
Already a Member? Login
More From AARP
What Caregivers Should Know About Medicare Coverage
25 Great Ways to Build Healthy Habits
Benefits recommended for you.
SAVE MONEY WITH THESE LIMITED-TIME OFFERS
The U.S. Department of Transportation’s Build America Bureau recently announced its first Transportation Infrastructure Financing and Innovation Act (“TIFIA”) loan for transit-oriented development projects. Such loans support transportation development with a variety of financing structures, including public-private partnerships and private activity bonds.
TIFIA loans provide financing for capital projects public infrastructure projects located within walking distance of, and accessible to, a transit facility, passenger rail station, intercity bus station, or intermodal facility. Projects must be within a ½ mile walking distance of a qualifying station/facility.
TIFIA funds are available for projects relating to economic development, including commercial and residential development. Eligible elements could include property acquisition; demolition of existing structures; walkways; pedestrian and bicycle access to a public transportation facility; construction, renovation, and improvement of intercity bus and intercity rail stations and terminals; renovation and improvement of historic transportation facilities; open space; safety and security equipment and facilities; facilities that incorporate community services such as daycare or health care; capital projects for a facility for an intermodal transfer facility or transportation mall; and construction of space for commercial uses.
Financing is available for up to 49% of eligible project costs. To be considered for a TIFIA loan, a project must have eligible costs reasonably anticipated to total at least $50 million ($10 million for rural infrastructure projects).
Entities eligible for TIFIA funding could include local governments; transit agencies; special authorities; special districts; or private firms or consortia that may include companies specializing in engineering, construction, materials, and/or the operation of transportation facilities.
The TIFIA credit program offers three distinct types of financial assistance, including secured (direct) loans, loan guarantees, and standby lines of credit.
Interest rates for TIFIA loans are set at the U.S. Treasury rate for a security of similar maturity. Such loans include flexible terms including, amortization with repayment periods of up to 35 years, deferred payment up to 5 years after substantial completion of the project, and no prepayment penalty.
See more »
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.
Refine your interests »
Shutts & bowen llp on:.
MarketWatch Guides is a reviews and recommendations team, independent of the MarketWatch newsroom. We might earn a commission from links in this content. Learn More
Divyakshi Sharma is a professional copywriter and a proud North Carolina State University graduate. Divi is the CEO and founder of Writeable: A Copywriting Agency and works with a variety of different brands, including Atlas Obscura, Bigmouth Copy and Gale Creative Agency. While her 9-to-5 is running her own business, her weekends are filled with hiking, yoga, reading Letterboxd reviews and conducting mostly successful food experiments.
Mortgage preapprovals can be essential for homebuyers, especially if you’re buying a home for the first time. That’s because they can help strengthen your offer on a property by showing sellers that you’re financially ready to buy.
This guide covers critical preapproval information, such as the right time to get preapproved, the difference between preapproval and prequalification, and the documents you’ll need to provide.
You should initiate the preapproval process about six to 12 months before you plan to buy a property. This time frame allows for a comprehensive assessment of your financial health, giving you a clear idea of what you can afford. It also provides ample time to address any issues that might arise, such as the need to improve your credit score or save for a larger down payment. This is a proactive approach that positions you as a serious buyer, making you more appealing to sellers.
Balancing the timing of mortgage preapproval is critical to a smooth home-buying experience. Starting the preapproval process too early can leave you with an expired preapproval letter before you actively start house hunting, requiring you to redo paperwork and reassess your financial situation.
On the other hand, waiting too long can limit your housing options and weaken your offers. Sellers often prefer buyers who have secured preapproval because this indicates financial readiness and reliability.
Prequalification is usually quick and involves a basic review of your financial situation, including your income, debts and assets. This is a simple and informal process that you can usually do online without submitting any documents.
Preapproval is a more serious and detailed process. The mortgage lender checks your financial background, and you’ll need to provide documents such as pay stubs, tax returns and bank statements. Preapprovals give you a more accurate idea of how much you can borrow and carry more weight with sellers. They show that you’re serious and ready to buy because a lender has closely reviewed your finances and deemed you a qualified buyer.
Getting preapproved for a mortgage is a key step in buying a home. Here’s a step-by-step guide to help you navigate this process:
To obtain mortgage preapproval, lenders typically require a range of documents to verify your financial standing and ability to repay a mortgage loan. Here’s what you’ll need to provide:
If you’re considering getting preapproved for a mortgage, here are some advantages and drawbacks to consider as you move forward:
Verification of loan amount: Preapproval gives you a clear idea of how much you can borrow based on your financial situation, which can help you narrow down your home search to properties within your budget.
Stronger buying power: With a preapproval letter in hand, you’re viewed as a serious buyer. This can be beneficial in a competitive real estate market as sellers are more likely to consider offers from pre-approved buyers.
Faster closing process: Because the lender has already done much of the financial vetting during your preapproval, the closing process can occur quicker.
Temporary impact on credit score: When lenders perform a credit check for preapproval, it can result in a hard inquiry on your credit report. While this typically causes only a temporary dip in your credit score , a small change could impact your rate offers.
Time limit: Preapproval letters are usually valid for a limited time, often 60 to 90 days. If you don’t find a home within that time frame, you might need to go through the preapproval process again, which could involve another credit check.
It’s generally a good idea to get two to three preapprovals from different lenders. This approach allows you to compare the various details of each offer, such as interest rates and fees. By doing so, you can make an informed decision and potentially save a significant amount of money over the life of your mortgage.
However, it’s important not to go overboard and apply for preapproval with too many lenders. Each preapproval application typically involves a hard inquiry on your credit report, which can temporarily lower your credit score. The good news is credit bureaus often recognize when you’re shopping for the best mortgage rates and will typically treat multiple inquiries made within a short period as a single inquiry, minimizing the impact on your credit score.
The preapproval process can vary in length, typically taking anywhere from a few days to a couple of weeks. This time frame depends on factors such as the lender’s efficiency, the complexity of your financial situation and how quickly you can provide the required documents.
It’s also important to note that preapproval isn’t indefinite. Most preapproval letters have an expiration date of around 60 to 90 days from the date of issuance. This is because lenders want to ensure your financial situation hasn’t changed significantly since they evaluated your application.
If your preapproval expires before you find a home, you can usually renew with the same lender. This might involve providing updated financial documents and undergoing another credit check. Remember, maintaining a stable financial situation will help ensure that your renewed preapproval is similar to the original.
As a first-time buyer , there are several strategies you can employ to potentially increase the amount you’re approved for:
With a verified mortgage preapproval letter, you position yourself as a credible and attractive buyer in the housing market as it shows sellers you have the financial backing to complete the property purchase. Start applying for preapproval about six to 12 months before you plan to buy a home to give yourself enough time to thoroughly evaluate your financial health.
How far in advance should i get preapproved for a mortgage.
You should get preapproved for a mortgage around six months to a year before you start house hunting. This will give you time to shop around for the best interest rates and terms.
Getting preapproved for a mortgage will typically result in a hard inquiry on your credit report. A hard inquiry can temporarily lower your credit score by a few points, but the impact is usually minimal and temporary. Your credit score should recover within a few months.
Getting preapproved for a home loan is a smart move. It helps you understand how much you can afford, shows sellers that you’re serious about buying and can make your offer more attractive in a competitive market. Preapproval also speeds up the overall mortgage process once you’ve chosen a home to buy.
*Data accurate at time of publication
If you have feedback or questions about this article, please email the MarketWatch Guides team at editors@marketwatchguides. com .
MarketWatch Guides may receive compensation from companies that appear on this page. The compensation may impact how, where and in what order products appear, but it does not influence the recommendations the editorial team provides. Not all companies, products, or offers were reviewed.
For California laws, the buck does really stop at Gov. Gavin Newsom’s desk.
While the Legislature approved hundreds of bills before ending its regular session on Aug. 31, Newsom decides whether they become law.
Already he’s signed a contentious package of bills to address retail theft and he agreed to a deal — not written into legislation — to help fund local newsrooms and AI research .
Now the governor has until Sept. 30 to decide on bills passed in the final days; he sometimes waits until right before the deadline to weigh in on contentious ones. And because he controls the fate of legislators’ bills, that could give him leverage during the special session he called on gas prices.
The governor gives a few typical reasons for vetoing bills: He deems them redundant, or calculates that their potential cost threatens to worsen the state’s budget situation. But he also blocks bills because they’re controversial, or opposed by powerful special interests.
Last year, Newsom vetoed 156 bills and signed 890 , or about 15%, a similar ratio as in 2022, when he blocked some very significant ones . In 2021, he vetoed less than 8% . While the Legislature can override vetoes, it takes a two-thirds vote in both the Assembly and Senate and that rarely happens . Governors can also allow bills to become law without their signature, but that doesn’t occur very often, either .
Here are some noteworthy bills being tracked by CalMatters reporters. Bookmark this page for updates.
By Wendy Fry
WHAT THE BILLS WOULD DO
Lawmakers shelved two critical pieces of reparations legislation in the final hours of the session, but sent 10 other reparations bills to the governor’s desk. The California Legislative Black Caucus announced 14 priority reparations bills in January based on recommendations made last year by a first-in-the-nation reparations task force. The most significant bill, AB 3089 , authored by Assemblymember Reggie Jones-Sawyer , a Democrat from Los Angeles and task force member, would require a formal apology from the state for “perpetuating the harms African Americans faced” from racial prejudice and unequal distribution of state and federal funding.
Also approved: SB 1050 , by Sen. Steven Bradford , a Democrat from Gardena, aimed at returning property or the financial equivalent to people who had their land taken by racially-motivated eminent domain; AB 1986 , to increase oversight on book bans in prisons; and SB 1089 to require grocery stores and pharmacies to notify employees before closing.
Another bill, AB 1815 by Assemblymember Akilah Weber , a Democrat from San Diego, would expand a 2019 law, barring hair discrimination in competitive sports.
WHO SUPPORTS THEM
The California Legislative Black Caucus and other members of the California Reparations Task Force who do not serve in the Legislature support most of the bills. Also backing the legislation are a slew of social and racial justice advocates and organizations such as the Black Equity Collective, the California Black Power Network, the ACLU and others.
WHO IS OPPOSED
Organizations generally did not register official opposition. Some Republicans abstained from voting. Many argue that because California was not a “slave state,” it is not responsible for making amends.
WHY IT MATTERS
California is the first state in the nation to grapple with the complexities of reparations — an effort that has sparked controversy among advocates and opponents alike. The most significant ongoing debate is whether reparations should be for all Black residents or just those who can prove they are the descendants of African Americans enslaved in the United States. Most of the bills before Newsom are more broadly tailored for overall racial equity, not aimed at a specific remedy for a specific harm. So far, California lawmakers have not pushed for cash payments.
Black lawmakers say this session is only a first step in building a foundation for future reparations measures. The Legislature also placed a measure on the November ballot asking voters to amend the California constitution to delete language that allows involuntary servitude as a form of punishment for crimes.
What California does could ripple into the presidential elections, with Republicans claiming Democrats made false promises to Black Californians about supporting reparations. Vice President Kamala Harris has only publicly supported studying the issue, but she’s close friends and political allies with Amos Brown , a task force member who was one of the strongest advocates for lineage-based reparations and direct compensation.
GOVERNOR’S CALLS
By Khari Johnson
Lawmakers passed three bills intended to protect voters from deepfakes — deceptive forms of audio, images and video generated by artificial intelligence.
AB 2839 by Assemblymember Gail Pellerin , a Democrat from Santa Cruz, goes after individuals who create or publish deceptive content made with AI. The bill allows a judge to order an injunction requiring them to either take down the content or pay damages. AB 2655 by Assemblymember Marc Berman , a Democrat from Palo Alto, requires large online platforms such as Facebook to remove or label deepfakes within 72 hours of a user reporting it. And AB 2355 by Assemblymember Wendy Carrillo , a Democrat from Los Angeles, requires political campaigns to disclose use of AI in advertising.
To comply with the First Amendment, the deepfake bills only affect content that is intended to deceive. Ones that are considered comedy or parody aren’t covered.
AB 2839 and AB 2655 were sponsored by California Initiative for Technology and Democracy, a branch of the nonpartisan nonprofit Common Cause. Attorney General Rob Bonta also supports AB 2839, which would go into effect immediately if signed into law and would apply 120 days before and 60 days after the Nov. 5 election.
Groups including the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the American Civil Liberties Union, and a range of book publishers groups opposed AB 2839 due to concerns the bill may violate free speech rights. Business and internet organizations are also against AB 2655. Only the foundation is listed as an opponent to AB 2355.
Deepfakes became a flashpoint earlier this summer when X CEO Elon Musk circulated a fake campaign ad that mimicked the voice of Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris. Gov. Gavin Newsom said the ad made by Musk should be illegal; Musk retorted that it was parody and thus protected speech. Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump posted a generated image of his political opponents in prison jumpsuits , although the platform he posted it to, Truth Social, is too small to be regulated by AB 2655.
The AI disclosure bills come amid concern about the accuracy of AI-generated content. According to a study released in February, more than half of answers from AI models such as Google’s Gemini, Mixtral, and Meta’s Llama-2 were labeled inaccurate. Still, the bills would not stop AI-generated disinformation, but just make users be more aware.
By Ryan Sabalow
WHAT THE BILL WOULD DO
SB 549 would allow tribal governments to sue their business competitors — private card rooms — over the tribes’ longstanding contention that these private gambling halls are illegally offering table games including blackjack and pai gow poker. Tribes say California voters gave them the exclusive rights to host the disputed table games. But because they’re sovereign governments, the tribes lack legal standing to sue.
WHO SUPPORTS IT
Tribes including those operating the state’s 70 tribal casinos support the measure. The bill has several bipartisan coauthors, many of whom have large casinos in their districts. The tribes contend the card rooms’ games have stolen hundreds of millions of dollars of revenue from historically disenfranchised tribal communities across California. They’ve spent millions of dollars on lobbying and political donations for this bill, as well as a failed sport-betting ballot initiative two years ago that included a similar provision.
Opposing the bill are the state’s 80 or so privately-owned gambling halls, as well as several California cities and the municipalities’ employee unions. Card rooms, which embarked on a massive lobbying blitz this year , say their games are not illegal and that the attorney general’s office has approved each of them. They argue that if the tribes are allowed to sue, the card clubs wouldn’t be allowed to sue tribes back, and they could go out of business from the ensuing legal fees. Card rooms’ annual earnings are barely 10% of what tribal governments make, and the tribes have outspent the card rooms in this fight three to one.
Cities, including San Jose, argue that if the card rooms stop offering the disputed table games, it could force the municipalities to cut police, fire and other city services because their budgets are propped up by the taxes and fees that the card rooms pay local governments. Tribes say passing the bill would go a long way toward California making amends for the atrocities the state committed on native peoples.
GOVERNOR’S CALL
By Kristen Hwang
AB 3129 by Assemblymember Jim Wood , a Democrat from Ukiah, would authorize the attorney general to approve or reject private equity takeovers of most medical businesses, such as doctors offices, outpatient clinics and surgery centers. The attorney general already regulates nonprofit hospital mergers and is able to stipulate conditions intended to protect patient access and cost, such as preventing facilities from eliminating certain services. This would grant similar review powers over transactions in private industry. It exempts for-profit and government-run hospitals.
The measure has been hotly contested in the Legislature. Supporters include consumer health advocates, the state doctors’ lobby, and Attorney General Rob Bonta, who sponsored the legislation. They warn that private equity buyouts in health care drive increased consolidation and higher prices while diminishing patient access.
The state hospital lobby and a coalition of investor groups and dental practices oppose the bill. The coalition, Californians to Protect Community Health Care , spent more than $500,000 lobbying against the measure in the most recent quarter, according to state financial reporting records. They argue that the measure will stifle much-needed investment in health care, leading to service cuts and hospital closures.
Private equity investment in health care has drawn scrutiny nationwide. The investment firms tend to finance the purchase of hospitals, doctors offices and the like with borrowed money, saddling them with debt before exiting and selling the properties.
In California, between 2005 and 2021, private equity deals in health care grew from $1 billion to $20 billion annually, according to a recent policy paper from the California Health Care Foundation .
GOVERNOR’S CALL
By Sameea Kamal
AB 1784 by Democratic Assemblymembers Gail Pellerin and Wendy Carrillo would stop candidates from seeking multiple offices, by clarifying state law to prevent candidates from filing papers for more than one office in a primary election. It also allows people to withdraw their candidacy until the filing deadline, which they currently can’t do. The bill does not apply to candidates for statewide office, and clarifies that withdrawal is final.
AB 2041 by Assemblymember Mia Bonta would make it easier for candidates to use campaign cash for their own security . Under current law, threats have to be verified by law enforcement. This bill would lift that requirement and allow spending on home or office security systems and other expenses (but not firearms) due to threats tied to official duties. The bill would allow politicians to protect their families and staff, and spend as much as $10,000 on security expenses over their careers.
AB 1784 is supported by Secretary of State Shirley Weber, the California Association of Clerks and Election Officials and California’s League of Women Voters, which said that having someone on the ballot twice can confuse voters and undermine confidence in elections. It could also lead to costly special elections if a candidate wins both contests, the group said.
Supporters of AB 2041 include the state’s Fair Political Practices Commission, which enforces campaign finance laws, as well as the League of California Cities. The bill’s supporters in the Legislature tell of increasing threats and harassment over controversial bills. They also point out that female candidates and officials are often the targets of threats. “Stalking and harassment have become all too common in today’s politics, especially for candidates who are female, LGBTQ+, and candidates of color,” Bonta said in a statement after her bill passed on the final night of session.
There is no registered opposition on file to either bill.
AB 1784 seeks to address the very specific debacle that resulted from Assemblymember Vince Fong putting his hat in the ring after Rep. Kevin McCarthy stepped down from Congress. Fong was already on the primary ballot to run for re-election in his Assembly district, so the Secretary of State tried to stop him from running for a second office. Fong sued, and won . Authors of the bill want to clarify for future elections that dual candidacies are prohibited.
Gov. Newsom vetoed a similar bill to AB 2041 last year, saying it lacked clear definitions of security expenses and could lead to unintended uses of political donations. But supporters say the bill language has been tightened up to only allow spending for reasonable costs. If Newsom signs this bill, it would take effect immediately, so candidates could take advantage during the fall campaign.
GOVERNOR’S CALLS
By Jenna Peterson
SB 969 would let local governments create “entertainment zones,” where bars and restaurants can sell alcoholic beverages that people can drink on public streets and sidewalks. Starting Jan. 1, cities could tailor these zones to fit their needs.
AB 1775 would legalize cannabis cafes in California. Cannabis lounges already exist in some places, but they’re limited to selling prepackaged food and drinks.
State Sen. Scott Wiener , a San Francisco Democrat and author of SB 969, says the bill would help boost local businesses and “make our cities more fun!” Currently, cities can designate open-container zones for events such as festivals and parades, but they’re only applicable to outside vendors. The city of San Jose, the California Nightlife Association, and the city and county of San Francisco are sponsors of the bill.
AB 1775’s author, Assemblymember Matt Haney, also a San Francisco Democrat, says the bill is necessary to support small cannabis businesses. He’s compared California’s cannabis culture to Amsterdam’s, which has well-known cannabis cafes that have been legal for decades. Many cannabis organizations are supporters of the bill.
Recorded opponents — which include the California Alcohol Policy Alliance, Alcohol Justice, California Council on Alcohol Problems and Citizens for a Better Los Angeles — say the bill could harm mixed-use neighborhoods and contribute to rising alcohol mortality rates and drunk driving accidents .
The American Heart and Lung Associations and other health-focused organizations oppose AB 1775 because cannabis contains particulate matter, which can cause cardiovascular disease and lung infections. They also say that secondhand cannabis smoke can be harmful to workers at cannabis cafes.
Many California cities have yet to see foot traffic recover from the COVID-19 pandemic. Last year, a University of Toronto study tracked cell phone activity to determine how many downtown visitors cities have recovered. While San Jose was at 96% as of October, Los Angeles was at 83%, San Francisco at 67% and Sacramento at 66%. Wiener pushed through a similar bill last year, but it was limited to San Francisco . Cannabis cafes could also contribute to post-pandemic recovery of foot traffic.
GOVERNOR’S CALLS
Two bills on the governor’s desk aim to improve transparency when a hospital plans to shut down its maternity ward and help state agencies understand the ripple effects of growing labor and delivery “deserts.”
If a hospital plans to close labor and delivery or inpatient psychiatric services, SB 1300 by Sen. Dave Cortese , a Democrat from Campbell, would require public notification four months in advance. The hospital would also need to hold a public hearing with its county board of supervisors and report why it is eliminating services and how its patients may be affected.
AB 1895 by Assemblymember Akilah Weber , a Democrat from La Mesa, would require hospitals to notify state regulators, including the Department of Public Health, of challenges keeping maternity services open. Regulators would be required to assess how service cuts would affect the community and identify the next closest hospitals with operating labor and delivery wards.
Cortese’s proposal is co-sponsored by the National Alliance on Mental Illness and supported by a number of behavioral health associations and consumer advocates. Supporters of Weber’s measure include the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists District IX, the California Nurse-Midwives Association, and Reproductive Freedom for All California, which all co-sponsored the legislation.
The California Hospital Association opposes Cortese’s measure, arguing that it does not address the underlying financial and staffing challenges many hospitals are struggling with, and may make it more difficult to keep services running.
Weber’s bill is unopposed.
Maternity wards are closing in California at an unprecedented rate. More than 50 hospitals have closed or reduced labor and delivery services in the past decade with at least eight more closures planned this year, according to an ongoing CalMatters investigation. In addition, birth centers , which can handle low-risk pregnancies, are also shutting down rapidly.
CalMatters reporting has revealed that these losses disproportionately impact low-income and Latino communities .
SB 1053 would ban all plastic grocery bags in California, so customers would have to use paper or reusable bags, effective Jan. 1, 2026. Voters approved a similar ban in 2016, but a loophole allowed for plastic bags that are thick enough to reuse.
The bill was authored by state Sens. Ben Allen and Catherine Blakespear , Democrats from El Segundo and Encinitas, respectively. They wrote the bill to raise awareness of the current law’s contribution to plastic pollution. More than 70 environmental organizations — including the Center for Environmental Health, Climate Action California and California Environmental Voters — support the bills because they would prevent plastic waste, which releases toxic chemicals into the air, water and soil.
Opposition includes the American Recyclable Plastic Bag Alliance, which says that according to a survey they conducted, 60% of Californians are reusing plastic bags from the grocery store. They also say that many reusable bags have a more negative impact on the environment than the currently legal plastic bags.
Plastic waste contributes to 3.4% of all greenhouse gas emissions, according to The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development . According to a CalRecycle report , plastic grocery bags made up more than 231,000 tons of California waste in 2021. When plastic enters a landfill, it breaks down into microplastics, which can seep into soil and contaminate groundwater.
GOVERNOR’S CALL
By Wendy Fry and Jeanne Kuang
AB 1840 and SB 227 , written by Assemblymembers Joaquin Arambula and María Elena Durazo , respectively, aim to ensure Californians are not excluded from assistance programs due to their immigration status.
AB 1840, written by Arambula, a Democrat from Fresno, makes clear that undocumented first-time homebuyers can apply for a program that offers 20% downpayment assistance of as much as $150,000. The bill has drawn national media attention, with Republicans claiming it follows “a long litany of taxpayer dollar giveaways…that encourage and reward illegal immigration.” A spokesperson for Arambula said the bill only clarifies that undocumented Californians can participate in “Dream for All” and other home purchase assistance programs if they meet all other eligibility and financial criteria. The program ran out of $300 million in funding 11 days after launching in 2023. Because of the state budget shortfall, no new funds were appropriated this year.
SB 227 requires the Employment Development Department, by next March, to come up with a plan on how to give undocumented workers who lose their jobs access to unemployment benefits. Employers pay into the unemployment fund; an expansion would likely need to be funded by the state. Gov. Gavin Newsom in 2022 vetoed a similar bill directly requiring the new program because lawmakers hadn’t identified a funding source. This version would make the administration figure out how to create the program, including how much it would cost, and then send the plan back to lawmakers and the Department of Finance for review.
A large coalition of immigrant rights advocates, including the ACLU, CHIRLA, the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights, and the Mexican American Opportunity Foundation.
California Republicans argue that programs providing aid to undocumented residents act as a magnet for illegal immigration, even as many Californians can’t afford to buy houses. Elon Musk posted on his social media site X that “half of earth should move to California given all the incentives to do so.”
There are no registered opponents for the unemployment bill. Newsom’s finance department last year opposed the bill because the state hadn’t budgeted funds for it, and called its timelines “infeasible,” but the bill has since been amended to require a plan rather than the program itself.
Decades of work went into building a social safety net for California’s roughly 2.3 million undocumented immigrants, who still have the highest poverty rates in the state . Some argue that because undocumented immigrants pay taxes, they should also have access to taxpayer-funded programs, like unemployment insurance. According to USC’s California Immigrant Data Portal , undocumented immigrants paid an estimated $3.7 billion in state and local taxes in 2019.
In recent years, natural disasters such as winter storms and extreme heat have shed light on how farmworkers, over half of whom are undocumented, can lose work with little notice. But with a tight state budget, Newsom has cited costs in halting or slowing down the state’s expansions of social services.
By Wendy Fry
AB 1810 by Assemblymember Isaac Bryan , a Democrat from Culver City, would require state prisons to provide incarcerated people with free and ready access to menstrual products without inmates having to request them. Currently, state prisons, local jails and juvenile facilities are required to provide sanitary pads and tampons products only “upon request.” A 2023 report by the attorney general’s office found half of the facilities surveyed were not complying, including 25 county jails that were not providing free period products.
A coalition of human and prisoner rights advocates, including the ACLU California Action, the San Francisco Public Defender, the Western Center on Law & Poverty and the Legal Services for Prisoners With Children organizations. Bryan said there were documented cases of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation officers withholding sanitary products as retaliation or punishment. Alissa Moore, the re-entry coordinator for Legal Services for Prisoners with Children , testified at a hearing on the bill that she was sexually assaulted several times during her 25 years in prison: “I often felt humiliated, and ashamed and embarrassed when I would have to, on occasion, ask the same staff that had victimized me for sanitary supplies.” The bill passed the Senate and Assembly without any “no” votes.
The California Family Council voiced opposition to the bill , arguing that the legislation does not clearly identify a person who menstruates as a woman. Some correctional officers have said male inmates sometimes ask for pads to make cushions for seats or for their sandals. State mandates that cost money for local jurisdictions, like county jails and juvenile detention facilities, are usually reimbursed by the state. According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, the bill does not have significant costs.
There are more than 3,700 women in state prisons , plus more than 9,800 in county jails . Formerly incarcerated people have described being humiliated by having to ask for personal hygiene products. Advocates say it can lead to unsafe and unsanitary conditions and lead to an imbalance of power between correctional officers and inmates.
California is reckoning with how it treats its prisoners. Proposition 6 is asking voters whether to change the state constitution to expressly ban involuntary servitude so that inmates in California jails and prisons can no longer be compelled to work and punished with solitary confinement or the loss of privileges for declining jobs, most of which pay less than $1 an hour.
By Khari Johnson
SB 1047 by Senator Scott Wiener , a Democrat from San Francisco, requires the makers of advanced artificial intelligence models to test their likelihood to cause critical harm to society. The bill also protects the rights of whistleblowers to raise concerns to the attorney general. The bill attempts to codify, oversee, and enforce safety testing similar to what major companies voluntarily agreed to in deals with the White House and governments in the United Kingdom and South Korea. The bill also takes steps toward establishing a public cloud computing cluster known as CalCompute to advance AI development.
In the weeks leading up to passage, X CEO Elon Musk and prominent researchers Yoshua Bengio and Geoffrey Hinton voiced support for the bill. Other supporters include AI company Anthropic, youth AI nonprofit organization Encode Justice, the Economic Security Project California, and experts including Lt. Gen. Jack Shanahan, the first director of the Joint AI Center at the Pentagon; Dan Hendrycks, director of the Center for AI Safety; and Daniel Kokotajlo and William Saunders, former OpenAI employees and whistleblowers.
Major AI developers including Google, Meta, and OpenAI strongly oppose the bill , arguing that it will stifle innovation and the availability of open source software. Eight members of Congress who represent California districts, all Democrats, took the unusual step of urging Gov. Newsom to veto the bill. Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of San Francisco also opposes the bill, saying in a letter that it does more harm than good.
California is home to the majority of the top AI companies in the world, so tough regulation of them could set a standard for the entire industry and for Congress. Supporters of the bill say now is the time to act because they don’t trust the makers of AI to self regulate particularly as profit pressures mount. Kokotajlo told CalMatters that if SB 1047 were in effect when he worked at OpenAI, it would have prevented or at least helped expose a violation of internal safety protocols he witnessed there.
By Mikhail Zinshteyn
AB 1780 by Assemblymember Philip Ting, a Democrat from San Francisco, would bar private nonprofit colleges from making admissions decisions based on whether a student has ties to a donor or an alumni. About a half dozen colleges currently factor legacy or donor ties in their admissions decisions — including Stanford and University of California . The bill would take effect next September. Schools that report that they violated the law would appear on a list published by the Department of Justice. They’ll also be required to publish aggregate data about their newly admitted class, including who were and were not admitted with legacy or donor ties, but not in a way that identifies individual students. Students with legacy or donor ties could still be admitted, just without preferential treatment.
A coalition of social justice and education groups and wide support from Democrats. Bill backers say the bill could influence other states to ban legacy and donor ties in admissions decisions, something four states so far have already done. They cite concerns that the very wealthy are much more likely to be admitted to highly selective colleges. Also, they underscore the chilling effect that last year’s U.S. Supreme Court decision to outlaw race-based affirmative action in the U.S. may have on students of color. If a student’s racial identity cannot be a factor in applying for college, why should proximity to wealth and power, their logic goes. The bill can both be a signal to students that college is for them and free up enrollment slots. WHO IS OPPOSED
In the Legislature, most Republicans opposed or didn’t vote for the bill. The major opponent, though, is the Association of Independent California Colleges and Universities, the group that represents the state’s 80-plus private nonprofit colleges and universities. The group has “ strong reservations ” about legislators scrutinizing the admissions and academic practices of private colleges. That’s the kind of oversight that’s typical for public colleges and universities, which receive billions of dollars in direct state support to fund their education missions. Private colleges generally just receive state financial aid dollars for their low-income students. A previous version of the bill would have required colleges that violate the law to repay the amount equal to what they received in student financial aid from the state. That was cut in amendments.
California’s public universities do not consider legacy or donor ties in admissions.
WHY IT MATTERS So far four states have approved such bans on either public or private institutions. But because California is the most populous state and enrolls more college students than any other, the bill takes on an outsized role in the national conversation about wealth, race and access to college. Bill backers say it will be a necessary corrective to last year’s U.S. Supreme Court ban on race-based affirmative action. If that decision may have caused a chill on student desire to apply for college, this bill would send a welcoming signal in response, backers say. The bill would again cement California as a trendsetter in state policy that takes on national resonance. The state was the first to ban affirmative action at public institutions through a voter-approved proposition in 1996 , setting off a wave of similar efforts across multiple states.
AB 2586 by Assemblymember David Alvarez , a Democrat from Chula Vista, would make California the first state in the nation to allow public colleges and university students who are undocumented to work at their campuses. The bill is based on a novel legal theory , first proposed by UCLA law professors, that argues that the 1986 federal law that bars undocumented residents from working doesn’t apply to state employers. About 60,000 students at California’s community colleges, California State University and the University of California could benefit starting Jan. 6 if Gov. Gavin Newsom signs it. WHO SUPPORTS IT
A coalition of undocumented students, the student governments of the three public higher education systems, UCLA legal scholars, some individual community colleges and a phalanx of social justice nonprofits. While undocumented students are eligible for state grants and tuition waivers, they’re blocked from receiving federal aid and loans, which denies them full access to funds to afford tuition, rent, school supplies and other basic needs. Many undocumented students already work, but risk being exploited or put in dangerous situations. Working on campus ensures more safety and jobs that are better fits with what students study.
Aside from the few Republicans who voted against the bill, no one officially, though the public university and community college system central offices expressed an assortment of concerns. The University of California worries that its hiring staff would be at risk of prosecution for flouting federal law and that its billions of dollars in federal contracts would be in jeopardy. The Cal State system had similar worries about the federal student financial aid all its students receive. The UCLA law scholars have argued those scenarios are highly unlikely and that in a worst-case scenario, a judge would tell the state and campuses that they can no longer hire undocumented students. The Senate’s judiciary committee staff analysis also pushed back on UC’s concerns.
The community college system, meanwhile, said it’ll struggle to meet the early January deadline to implement the law.
WHY IT MATTERS Students and UCLA legal scholars first proposed the idea to the UC Board of Regents, who pledged in 2023 to consider the proposal. Ultimately, the regents voted to delay any implementation, citing the analysis of the system’s lawyers and outside counsel about the risks to the UC in the event the federal government retaliates. Heartbroken, the students and their allies synced up with Alvarez to propose this bill. The bill would mean more economic opportunity for undocumented college students. It may also prompt other state legislation to allow more state agencies to hire undocumented residents. How the bill is received by the federal government will be top of mind for state and national immigration and education watchers. The stakes may be even higher if Donald Trump again wins office: He and his aides want to deport millions of undocumented Americans and establish deportation camps near the southern border .
By Alexei Koseff
AB 1825 , by Assemblymember Al Muratsuchi , a Torrance Democrat, would require public libraries in California to establish a clear policy for choosing books, including a way for community members to voice their objections, but would prohibit banning material because it deals with race or sexuality. It also clarifies that library material can include sexual content that’s not obscene and leaves to the discretion of librarians where to display those books, though they could not prevent minors from checking them out.
Over the past year, politicians in Huntington Beach and Fresno County created review committees for children’s library books to move material with “sexual references” and “gender-identity content” into restricted sections, where it could only be accessed with a parent’s permission. This has raised fears in the LGBTQ community that they are being targeted and their stories suppressed. The California Library Association, civil liberties advocates at ACLU California Action and LGBTQ rights organization Equality California argue that the state must protect diverse perspectives at public libraries amid growing threats of censorship.
Opponents of AB 1825, including the California Family Council, which lobbies for a conservative Christian perspective in policymaking, complain that the measure would undermine their efforts to keep inappropriate reading material out of children’s hands. They contend that book review panels allow communities to set their own standards for age-appropriate material and parents to introduce their kids to controversial topics on their own terms.
Public libraries are the latest front in a burgeoning battle between California’s liberal government and more conservative communities across the state. With Democrats so dominant in Sacramento that they can dismiss the cultural grievances animating political discourse in red states, such as election fraud and abortion restrictions, Republicans are turning to local governance to push back against California’s progressive values. The state has moved quickly to shut down these flashes of rebellion through bills such as AB 1825.
By Marisa Kendall
SB 1395 by Sen. Josh Becker , a Democrat from Menlo Park, would make it easier for cities and counties to quickly set up tiny homes for their homeless residents.
How? Traditional homeless shelters already are exempt from some of the red tape that often slows down housing construction, including the California Environmental Quality Act. Becker’s bill would expand that to include shelters that are “non-congregate and relocatable.” In other words: tiny homes. The bill also would extend cities’ ability to streamline the construction of homeless shelters, which now is set to expire in 2027.
The bill’s co-sponsors include San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan (whose city has embraced tiny homes as solution to homelessness), DignityMoves (a nonprofit that helps build tiny homes villages), the Bay Area Council, and SPUR (a nonprofit public policy organization focused on housing and transportation).
SB 1395 has no registered opposition. But that wasn’t the case last session, when a similar version introduced by Becker died following opposition from prominent groups that included the National Alliance to End Homelessness, the Western Center on Law & Poverty and the Corporation for Supportive Housing. They complained the bill characterized tiny homes as permanent housing. In reality, they said, tiny homes’ substandard construction (many lack kitchens and bathrooms) means they should be used as temporary shelters only. The new version of the bill specifies that tiny homes are temporary shelters.
As homeless encampments continue to grow, the state and many cities are doubling down on tiny homes as a quick way to get people off the streets. San Jose has more than 500, and there are 2,000 statewide, according to DignityMoves . Newsom last year promised 1,200 tiny homes to four communities in California, though that project ran into some snags .
By Ben Christopher
AB 2347 by Assemblymember Ash Kalra , a San Jose Democrat, would give tenants 10 business days to respond to an eviction notice, doubling the current deadline of five business days. If a tenant doesn’t respond within that time frame, they automatically lose their eviction case.
Legal aid organizations that represent low-income tenants are the main backers of the bill. They’re joined by affordable housing advocates, the California Democratic Party and the city of San Jose. Supporters argue that tenants being threatened with eviction may also be struggling financially, not have access to legal representation, not speak English as a first language, or fail to understand the significance of the landlord’s eviction notice. Five court calendar days, they say, is simply not enough time to respond.
Researchers have found that tenants lose 40% or more of their eviction cases in California by default — either because they failed to respond on time or filed the application incorrectly.
Landlords. It often takes months between when an eviction notice is filed and when an owner can reclaim their property from a tenant. Extending that process even further means higher costs for those in the rental industry and, landlord lobbying groups warn, higher rents.
California has one of the highest rates of homelessness in the county. California already has laws on the books that restrict how and when landlords can boot tenants from their rental properties, but this bill would give tenants more legal leverage to make use of those protections. Supporters hope that will keep more Californians from becoming homeless in the first place.
SB 450 by San Diego Democratic Sen. Toni Atkins is aimed at “fixing” one of the most controversial state housing laws in recent memory.
In 2021, Gov. Newsom signed another Atkins bill that allows California homeowners to divide their properties into as many as four separate units. That law was both lauded and condemned at the time as the “ end of single family zoning ” as we know it. In practice, it did no such thing. Few homeowners made use of the law . This bill is aimed at making that law more user friendly, by requiring local governments to approve applications quickly and preventing them from saddling duplex-ification proposals with extra requirements.
The bill also includes language promoting it as a statewide solution to California’s “severe shortage of housing.” That’s meant to address a court ruling from earlier this year that exempted charter cities from the 2021 law .
Builders, landlords and “Yes in my Backyard” activists. For years, pro-density and development advocates have argued that zoning restrictions that keep apartment complexes, townhouses and multiplexes out of certain neighborhoods makes it harder for the state to build its way out of the current housing shortage and exacerbates economic and racial exclusion.
Santa Clarita in Los Angeles County and local governments in San Mateo opposed the bill, arguing that it chips away local authority over land use and puts an added burden on city planners. Though this year’s effort generated less attention, the original bill in 2021 saw enormous opposition from local governments, suburban neighborhood associations, anti-density advocates and some progressive political advocacy groups.
“Ending single family zoning” has long been the holy grail of YIMBY advocates and pro-equity groups. The 2021 law was a symbolically important crack at statewide zoning reform, but its impact was limited. This year’s bill is another effort to make that vision of a denser California a reality — and to see whether achieving the goal will also make the state more affordable.
AB 1979 would allow victims of doxxing — when someone shares identifying information online about someone else with the intent to harm them — to sue their attackers in civil court for damages of as much as $30,000.
Assemblymember Chris Ward , a San Diego Democrat, and Assemblymember Cecilia Aguiar-Curry , a Davis Democrat, co-authored the bill. AB 1979 has support from many LGBTQ+ rights organizations, as members of the LGBTQ+ community are disproportionately targets of doxxing. A number of Jewish rights organizations announced their support for the bill earlier this month, and the Anti-Defamation League is a co-sponsor.
There is no recorded opposition to AB 1979. Newport Beach Republican Diane Dixon was the sole “no” vote in the Assembly, and told CalMatters she generally opposes bills that create a private right to action because they clog up the court system. The bill also received five “no” votes in the Senate.
It’s difficult to obtain evidence for doxxing, so the crime isn’t prosecuted often. For example, only one doxxing case was filed in Sacramento County in the last five years. According to a 2024 Anti-Defamation League Report , 45% of transgender respondents said they had experienced severe online harassment in the last year, and LGBTQ+ advocates say harassment is worsening as anti-trans legislation rises across the country.
Doxxing has also played a role in recent Gaza war demonstrations, with many protesters wearing face coverings in fear of being identified and facing online harassment.
SB 804 would allow community service officers — uniformed police department civilian employees who don’t have arrest powers — to testify at preliminary hearings where authorities present evidence to a judge who decides whether to move ahead with a full felony trial. Witnesses or victims are still required to testify in a trial. As it stands, only sworn officers are allowed to testify at “prelims,” despite community service officers often taking witness statements at crime scenes and during investigations.
The Redding Police Department brought the issue to the attention of the region’s senator, Republican Brian Dahle , arguing that as police budgets shrink, community services officers should be allowed to testify to free up sworn officers for other duties. The California State Sheriffs Association, the California Police Chiefs Association, San Francisco Mayor London Breed and the state’s police union support the legislation. Proponents say that it would keep officers from having to re-interview witnesses. Plus, they argue that having fewer armed officers interacting with witnesses helps address concerns about over-policing in communities of color.
ACLU California Action, criminal defense attorneys, including the California Public Defenders Association, and social justice groups opposed the legislation. They argue that the changes could lead to shoddy testimony being admitted into legal proceedings where a suspect’s freedom is on the line. They argue that preliminary hearings are already tilted in the favor of police and prosecutors. “The bottom line is that preliminary hearings are so problematic right now,” Ignacio Hernández of California Attorneys for Criminal Justice, told the Assembly Public Safety Committee this summer .
Since 1990, the state’s population has grown by nearly 10 million people, yet the numbers of California’s sworn patrol officers have dropped to below where they were in 1991, according to a recent report from the Public Policy Institute of California. Sworn officer staffing shortages are particularly prevalent in rural areas such as those in Dahle’s sprawling Senate district in northeastern California.
At the same time, in the wake of high-profile cases of unjustified police violence, social justice advocates have been urging California lawmakers and local governments to scale back the numbers of armed police patrolling communities of color. Some communities are deploying unarmed social or mental-health workers trained to defuse confrontations in situations where armed officers used to be the sole respondents.
The bipartisan SB 1043 seeks to bring greater transparency to the treatment of children and young adults living in state-licensed facilities — specifically short-term residential therapeutic programs. The bill would expand reporting requirements over the facilities’ use of restraints and seclusion rooms.
Following an incident that involves restraining a child (or youth up to 21 years old) or putting a youth in a seclusion room, the facility would be required to provide a report to both the youth and to their parent, guardian or other representative. The report would include a description of the incident and various other information, and a copy would be provided to the California Department of Social Services. The department would be required to review reported incidents for any health, safety and licensing violations and investigate the incident if needed. The department must also make data about these incidents publicly available on its website by Jan. 1, 2026.
Led by Sen. Shannon Grove , a Bakersfield Republican, the measure has several Democratic and Republican co-authors. But the bill’s most recognizable and famous supporter is Paris Hilton , the hotel heiress, socialite and media personality. As a teenager, Hilton experienced physical and emotional abuse at youth treatment centers in California, Utah and Montana. This has led to her personal crusade against institutional abuse in the “troubled teen industry.” Hilton’s nonprofit, 11:11 Media Impact, is a co-sponsor of the bill. Disability Rights California and Children’s Law Center of California also support the proposal.
WHO IS OPPOSED
There is no formal opposition registered and no lawmakers have voted against the bill, though some legislators did not vote.
In 2021, after reports of rampant abuse , California passed a law prohibiting the practice of sending troubled youth, including foster children, to out-of-state, for-profit treatment centers. As an alternative, youths can be sent to short-term therapeutic facilities licensed by the state’s social services department. Two years ago, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed into law to fund crisis residential treatment facilities for children on Medi-Cal. The bill seeks to bring more transparency and accountability to the 355 facilities operating in California . It would also provide parents or guardians, who may have to make the difficult decision of sending their children to one of these facilities, information about any potential misuse of restraints and seclusion rooms.
By Nigel Duara
AB 2178 by Assemblymember Phil Ting , a Democrat from San Francisco, would cap the number of empty beds at all California prisons at 11,300 by the summer of 2026. It would require further cuts each year until reaching the state’s minimum capacity requirement of 2,500 empty beds. That likely means closing prisons.
The measure is meant to reduce spending on prisons, which house about 65,000 fewer inmates today than they held in 2011. Despite the falling inmate population, California is expected to spend $18 billion on state prisons over the next year, an annual budget of $3 billion more than at the start of the Newsom administration in 2019.
A wide variety of public defense and civil rights organizations support Ting’s bill. They include the ACLU of Northern California, the California Public Defenders Association and a prison advocacy group called Californians United for a Responsible Budget. The California Nurses Association also backs the proposal.
The bill is opposed by the California Correctional Peace Officers Association , the union for prison guards, which said that tightening capacity limits will mean tighter quarters that pose more danger to guards. It’s also opposed by the California Association of Psychiatric Technicians , a smaller union that represents mental health workers in state prisons and state hospitals.
California prisons have an empty bed problem. The prison system, which was once so crowded that inmates slept in hallways and day rooms, has cut down on its population over the last decade under federal court orders. The result is that the prison system now has too many empty beds, at least 13,000 in January. By 2028, the prison system is anticipated to have 19,000 empty beds, about one-fifth of the system’s total capacity.
Gov. Gavin Newsom has moved to close four prisons , a reduction that his administration says will save about $3.4 billion by 2027. A recent report from the Legislative Analyst’s Office says the system can afford to close five more, which would save an additional $1 billion a year.
By Jeanne Kuang
Authored by Sen. Dave Cortese, a Campbell Democrat, SB 1299 would make it easier for farmworkers to make a workers’ compensation claim for heat illness. Under the current system a worker can get covered for any workplace injury — whether it’s their employer’s fault or not — if they can prove the injury was connected to the job. Benefits include payments for medical care, lost wages or death benefits for the family. For certain injuries in certain industries, workers claiming benefits get a “presumption” (legalese for a fast-track to approval) that their injury was work-related — firefighters who develop cancer, for example, because of how often they are exposed to carcinogens in burning buildings. The bill gives a similar, though narrower, presumption to farmworkers claiming heat illness by allowing them to more easily link the injury to their job, specifically in cases in which the employer was not following state safety rules for those who work outside in the heat.
The bill is sponsored by the United Farm Workers and has support from labor groups and attorneys who represent injured workers in workers’ compensation claims. The United Farm Workers say the bill can put financial pressure on employers to comply with the heat rules, in the absence of more robust state enforcement.
Farming groups oppose the bill, as well as workers’ compensation insurance carriers and broader business groups such as the California Chamber of Commerce. Business groups say the bill unfairly mixes workplace safety regulations with workers’ compensation insurance rules, and worry it could put employers on the hook for heat cases that are not work-related.
Heat waves in California are growing longer and more intense , but workers’ advocates say many employers still do not follow the state’s nearly two-decade-old outdoor work heat rules that require growers, farm labor contractors, construction site supervisors and others to provide shade, breaks and water and to monitor their workers for heat illness. The challenge is compounded by an understaffed state workplace safety agency; CalMatters reported in August that the agency’s enforcement of heat rules has declined significantly since 2019 despite the increasing risks of extreme heat.
By Ana B. Ibarra
AB 1830 by Assemblymember Joaquin Arambula sets out to help make pregnancies healthier by requiring that manufacturers of corn masa add folic acid to their products starting in 2026. Corn masa is used to make tortillas, corn chips and other foods. The federal government already requires folic acid in enriched grain products, including cereals, breads, pasta and rice because of its known effectiveness in helping prevent birth defects.
Specifically, the bill requires 0.7 milligrams of folic acid in every pound of masa flour. That addition must be reflected in the nutrition label. Through the legislative process, the bill was amended to make exemptions for small businesses and restaurants, which often make their own corn masa and tortillas.
The bill is supported by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, March of Dimes and a number of organizations that advocate for kids’ health.
There is no registered opposition on file.
Arambula said this bill will help address disparities in who gets the necessary amount of folic acid. State public health data show that Latinas are less likely to take folic acid in the early weeks of pregnancy or before becoming pregnant when compared to other racial or ethnic groups. This puts them at higher risk of having children born with birth defects of the brain and spinal cord, most commonly spina bifida and anencephaly . Research shows that folic acid can help prevent birth defects by as much as 70%.
AB 2442 , authored by Los Angeles Democrat Rick Chavez Zbur , would speed up the licensure process for gender-affirming healthcare providers. The bill does not change the requirements to get a license; rather it prioritizes applicants who intend to practice gender-affirming healthcare or gender-affirming mental health care. As part of a package of new laws on abortion access , the legislature passed a similar law in 2022 to expedite licenses for abortion service providers after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe vs. Wade. AB 2442 has a sunset clause, so the legislature would reevaluate the need for the bill in four years.
Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California and Equality California are sponsors of the bill, which also has support from organizations that support LGBTQ+ rights, reproductive justice and healthcare access.
The California Family Council, Our Duty Democrat, Protect Kids Initiative and Protection of the Educational Rights of Kids Advocacy are recorded opponents of AB 2442. The latter group says that other providers should also get expedited licensing, and that the bill could hurt other areas of medicine. Instead, they want to add more staff to the Department of Consumer Affairs so that all medical providers can get licensed more efficiently. The other organizations have concerns about the safety of children undergoing gender reassignment surgery or hormone therapy before their brains fully develop, saying it could harm mental health and lead to infertility.
Twenty-six states have passed laws that ban gender-affirming care. In a 2022 survey by the National Center for Transgender Equality, 47% of transgender respondents said they had considered moving to another state because of these laws. In California, patients seeking gender-affirming care at Stanford Medical Center often have to wait six to eight months to get an appointment. Supporters say AB 2442 would allow California to keep up with the demand from out-of-state patients while continuing to support in-state patients. In 2022, California passed a law protecting those receiving or providing such treatment from prosecution by other states.
SB 1061 by Sen. Monique Limón would remove medical debt from credit reports and prohibit debt collectors from reporting patients’ medical debt information to credit agencies. This pertains specifically to debt owed to a medical provider, such as a hospital or a doctor’s office, and not medical debt charged to credit cards.
The bill is backed by Attorney General Rob Bonta, the California Nurses Association and a number of consumer advocacy organizations.
The bill was originally opposed by a coalition of bankers and creditors that pushed back on the bill’s definition of “medical debt” because it included medical credit cards, which are often offered at doctors’ and dentists’ offices as a way to pay for a procedure, but also can be used to pay for elective services, fitness programs and even veterinary services. That kind of debt, these groups argued, should not be hidden from lenders. The coalition removed its opposition once the bill redefined medical debt to that owed directly to providers.
About 4 in 10 Californians report carrying some type of medical debt, according to the California Health Care Foundation. Medical debt can significantly weigh down credit scores and hurt consumers’ chances at securing a rental, a mortgage or car loan.
Pharmacy benefit managers work as middlemen between insurance companies and drug manufacturers. They process claims, negotiate drug prices and help determine the list of drugs that health insurance plans cover.
SB 966 by Sen. Scott Wiener , a Democrat from San Francisco, would prohibit pharmacy benefit managers from restricting where patients can fill prescriptions and mandate that 100% of discounts negotiated with drug manufacturers be passed onto health insurance plans. It would also require the state insurance department to license pharmacy benefit managers and improve price transparency.
The measure is co-sponsored by the California Pharmacists Association, California Chronic Care Coalition, Los Angeles LGBT Center and San Francisco AIDS Foundation. Supporters say exclusionary practices have forced the closure of 300 pharmacies across the state and limited drug access. It is also supported by Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, which represents drug companies.
Health plans and trade organizations representing pharmacy benefit managers are the primary opponents to the measure. They say preferred pharmacy networks, formularies and discounts are all strategies that allow pharmacy benefit managers to keep prices reasonable. They blame drug companies for driving up prices and say this legislation would increase premiums by $1.7 billion in the first year.
Spending on prescription drugs in California ballooned 39% in just five years, according to the most recent state data . State and federal regulators are increasingly concerned about tactics used by pharmacy benefit managers to generate profits. A report from the Federal Trade Commission , which is investigating the middlemen, suggests that the largest organizations may be engaging in practices specifically to evade regulation, such as moving portions of their operations out of the country. Research also suggests consolidation drives prescription drug prices higher with the three biggest companies — CVS Caremark, Express Scripts and OptumRx — controlling 80% of the market.
SB 1174 by Sen. Dave Min , a Democrat from Irvine, would ban local governments from requiring voters to present identification to vote. The bill attempts to push back against a charter provision passed by voters in Huntington Beach that supporters said would prevent voter fraud. Min said “an overwhelming body of evidence proves our elections are safe, secure, and above board.”
Groups that advocate for voter access such as the League of Women Voters of California, as well as California Environmental Voters and Disability Rights California. Common Cause California said that voter identification is already required when someone registers to vote, and that there are numerous protections in place to prevent voter fraud. The group — and other supporters — say the city’s law would disproportionately impact Latino, Black, young and low-income voters, and would create confusion since it would only apply to the local elections, which might be held at the same time as state and federal elections.
Min’s bill is in response to the city of Huntington Beach’s move to place a measure on the ballot allowing the city to verify voter eligibility through IDs, which 53% of voters passed in March — one of several local initiatives aimed at pushing back against California’s progressive politics .
An attorney for Huntington Beach said the city’s law, which takes effect in 2026, is intended to increase participation in elections, and that the ballot measure represented “ the will of the people .” In addition to the city, the bill is also opposed by the conservative-aligned group Election Integrity Project California, and the Greater Bakersfield Republican Assembly. Republicans from other parts of the state, including Riverside-area Assemblymember Bill Essayli , have also opposed the bill
This bill is the latest front in an ongoing battle over allegations of voter fraud , which have been rampant since the 2016 election. In April, Attorney General Rob Bonta and Secretary of State Shirley Weber filed a lawsuit against the city of Huntington Beach , alleging that the voter ID requirement is in conflict with state law. The lawsuit is pending.
AB 2504 would designate the shell of the black abalone — an endangered marine snail — as California’s official state seashell. AB 1797 would name the Dungeness crab the state crustacean. And AB 1850 would recognize the banana slug as the state slug. These would be the latest additions to the state’s 44 official symbols.
The shell bill was authored by Assemblymember Diane Dixon , a Republican from Newport Beach who notes that the black abalone has an important history to Native American tribes in Southern California, who have used the shell for trading and ceremony regalia and eaten the snail for thousands of years. The crab measure was authored by Assemblymember Jim Wood , a Ukiah Democrat. And the slug bill came from Assemblymember Gail Pellerin , a Santa Cruz Democrat. All three bills won overwhelming support in the Legislature.
There is no recorded opposition from advocacy groups to any of the three bills. Assemblymember Tom Lackey , a Republican from Palmdale, was the lone vote against the slug bill, but “in good fun .”
The National Marine Fisheries Service designated the black abalone as an endangered species in 2009, as it faces environmental threats such as overfishing, disease and natural disasters. Lawmakers hope the designation will help Californians be more aware of those dangers. The Dungeness crab was chosen because of its positive impact on the commercial fishing industry and coastal economies. Pellerin chose the banana slug not only because it’s the mascot of University of California, Santa Cruz, but it also symbolizes California’s biological diversity.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Name of Loan Officer. Name of Financial Institution or Bank. Address of Financial Institution or Bank. City, State, Zip Code. RE: Loan Application for $100,000. Dear [Loan Officer's Name], I am writing to formally request a loan of $100,000. As a loyal customer for the past 20 years, I have always trusted this institution with my financial ...
20 Best Loan Application Letter Samples (Guide and Format) An application letter for a loan is a formal letter written to a financial institution by a borrower requesting a loan, payable in a specified amount of time. The letter helps lenders get acquainted with the borrowers better to determine if they qualify for the loan based on the ...
A well-structured letter is key. Generally, it should include: Introduction: Briefly introduce yourself and state the purpose of the letter.; Body: Detail your financial situation, loan purpose, and repayment plan.; Conclusion: Summarize your request and express gratitude.; Step 4: Personalize Your Approach. Research the lending company to understand their preferences and tailor your letter ...
Step 2: Start with Your Contact Information. Begin your letter with your contact information at the top, followed by the date and the lender's details. This establishes a professional tone from the outset. Example: Your Name. Your Business Name. Your Business Address. City, State, Zip Code. Date.
New York, NY 65782. RE: Small business loan request for $20,000. Dear Mr. Burrows: The purpose of this letter is to request a small business loan in the amount of $20,000 for the purpose of enlarging our warehouse. Entirely Electronics began operation on June 1, 2020, with two employees.
Use a formal business letter format. Include your contact information and the date. 3. Introduce Yourself and Your Business. Briefly describe who you are and what your business does. Highlight your experience and achievements. 4. State the Purpose of the Loan. Clearly define why you need the loan.
First, the borrower is made to fill out a loan application form which is prepared by the lender. The aspects which are to be included in the loan application form are the following: The payment method, whether personal, through a check, online banking, etc. The number of times the payment is going to be made.
Elements of a Successful Loan Application Letter. Include your name, address, phone number, and email. Address the letter to a specific person if possible. Clearly state the purpose of the loan. Provide detailed financial information and a repayment plan. End with a professional closing and your signature.
Your name. Company name. Company phone number. Company address. Loan agent or lender's name and title. Loan agent or lender's contact details. A subject line stating the desired loan amount. Follow this by incorporating a greeting right below the header so that you introduce your application with a friendly tone. 2.
Subject: Loan application letter. Dear Sir/Madam, I have a savings account in your bank for the last five years. I want to avail a home loan from your bank. I would like to know the details to seek a home loan from your bank. I am a salaried employee, and I work for a central government organisation as a research scientist.
Many elements go into writing a loan request letter. These request letters are a form of well-documented proposal that accompanies other loan application documents, which is why they should convey specific information. When writing a loan request letter, your letter must have specific information. This information includes: 1.
1. Be professional. A loan application is serious business to a bank and entails some risk. By keeping your letter professional, you come across as more trustworthy and a better investment. 2. Learn the loan officer's name. You want to address your application letter to a person, not a bank or team within the bank.
The first sentence of your letter should express your request for the loan and the amount you want to borrow. Next, use a few short and concise sentences to provide a basic overview of your business. In this section, be sure to include: Business's legal name and any DBA that your business uses.
For example, your summary might look something like this: I'm writing to request a [loan amount] loan for my small business in the [industry name] industry, [business name]. With this loan, [business name] would [describe your intended business loan use]. As you can see, you don't need much detail here. You're just giving the reader a ...
Subject: Personal Loan Request. Dear [Bank Manager's Name], I am writing to request a personal loan of [amount] to [purpose of the loan]. I have been a loyal customer of your bank for [number] years and have maintained a good account standing. I am currently employed at [your employer] as a [your position] with a steady monthly income of ...
1. Make Header Relevant. The header is very important before writing this letter to your company for a personal loan, you should include these details. You need to add the date, month, day, and year when you're writing the loan application letter. Make sure the date is correct. Your name is necessary of course.
Follow the steps to write a letter for loan approval: 1. Add basic information about the business. The first step to drafting a communicative, informative and persuasive business loan request letter is to begin with a header and a greeting. An effective header includes some lines, providing the basics of your business loan request.
Bank Loan Request Letter for Small Business (SBA) Dear [Loan Manager's Name], I am writing to request a loan of $50,000 from the Small Business Administration (SBA) to fund the expansion of my small business, XYZ Company. I have been self-employed as the owner of XYZ Company for the past 5 years and have consistently earned a net profit of ...
Prerequisites for Writing Loan Request Letters. While a loan request letter may be needed for bank and SBA loans, it won't be enough for approval unless it's supported by a sound credit situation and solid financial planning.For your request to be persuasive to lenders, you should do 2 things before preparing your business request letter and loan application package:
Template 3: Loan Request to Fund Education. Dear [Loan Officer's Name], I am writing to seek financial assistance in the form of a student loan to pursue [type of degree] at [Name of University]. The program commences in [month, year], and I am enthusiastic about the prospects this education will afford me. Attached are my admission letter ...
The Branch Manager, [Bank Name], [Bank Address], Subject: Request for Quick Loan Approval. Dear Sir/Madam, I, [Your Name], an existing account holder in your esteemed bank with the account number [Account Number], am writing this letter to formally request for a loan. I am in need of a personal loan amounting to INR [Loan Amount] due to ...
Sample Loan Application Letter Template. iadg.com. Details. File Format. PDF; Size: 7.1 KB Download Now. ... An institution that has a financial aid director, needs to address the students regarding the availability of the facility of loans for the students. If you need to make a letter for that, you just refer to this template.
Loan Facility Letter is part of Corporate Documents. Just £35.00 + VAT provides unlimited downloads from Corporate Documents for 1 year. Download. Template letter from a lender to a borrower setting out the terms on which the loan will be available; an alternative to a short form loan agreement.
Mortgage pre-approval letters are typically valid for 60 to 90 days. ... After reviewing a mortgage application, a lender will provide a decision to pre-approve, deny, or pre-approve with ...
The commitment letter provides for a new senior secured credit facility (the "Term Loan Facility") with funds managed by affiliates of Apollo (NYSE: APO) ("Apollo Funds") of up to $900 million, to be comprised of an initial term loan facility of approximately $675 million (the "Initial Term Facility"), to be funded at the time of ...
Step 1: Get the Long Form Birth Certificate or Death Certificate with a Letter of Exemplification. Order Online: Visit VitalCheck and select "Apostille/Authentication" from the request reasons drop-down.; Order by Mail: For Birth Certificates: Download the application (PDF) and answer "Yes" to question 11b.; For Death Certificates: Download the application (PDF) and answer "Yes" to question 10.
"It's the first time in the history of the Medicare program that people have a cap on how much they could have to pay out of pocket," Meena Seshamani, M.D., the director of the federal Center for Medicare, said in an interview with AARP.
TIFIA loans provide financing for capital projects public infrastructure projects located within walking distance of, and accessible to, a transit facility, passenger rail station, intercity bus ...
Complete the application: Once you've selected a lender, you'll need to gather and submit several important documents to complete the mortgage application. These include proof of income, tax ...
For California laws, the buck does really stop at Gov. Gavin Newsom's desk. While the Legislature approved hundreds of bills before ending its regular session on Aug. 31, Newsom decides whether they become law.. Already he's signed a contentious package of bills to address retail theft and he agreed to a deal — not written into legislation — to help fund local newsrooms and AI research.