what to include in research paper

• Privacy Policy

Home » Research Paper – Structure, Examples and Writing Guide

Research Paper – Structure, Examples and Writing Guide

Table of Contents

Research Paper

Definition:

Research Paper is a written document that presents the author’s original research, analysis, and interpretation of a specific topic or issue.

It is typically based on Empirical Evidence, and may involve qualitative or quantitative research methods, or a combination of both. The purpose of a research paper is to contribute new knowledge or insights to a particular field of study, and to demonstrate the author’s understanding of the existing literature and theories related to the topic.

Structure of Research Paper

The structure of a research paper typically follows a standard format, consisting of several sections that convey specific information about the research study. The following is a detailed explanation of the structure of a research paper:

The title page contains the title of the paper, the name(s) of the author(s), and the affiliation(s) of the author(s). It also includes the date of submission and possibly, the name of the journal or conference where the paper is to be published.

The abstract is a brief summary of the research paper, typically ranging from 100 to 250 words. It should include the research question, the methods used, the key findings, and the implications of the results. The abstract should be written in a concise and clear manner to allow readers to quickly grasp the essence of the research.

Introduction

The introduction section of a research paper provides background information about the research problem, the research question, and the research objectives. It also outlines the significance of the research, the research gap that it aims to fill, and the approach taken to address the research question. Finally, the introduction section ends with a clear statement of the research hypothesis or research question.

Literature Review

The literature review section of a research paper provides an overview of the existing literature on the topic of study. It includes a critical analysis and synthesis of the literature, highlighting the key concepts, themes, and debates. The literature review should also demonstrate the research gap and how the current study seeks to address it.

The methods section of a research paper describes the research design, the sample selection, the data collection and analysis procedures, and the statistical methods used to analyze the data. This section should provide sufficient detail for other researchers to replicate the study.

The results section presents the findings of the research, using tables, graphs, and figures to illustrate the data. The findings should be presented in a clear and concise manner, with reference to the research question and hypothesis.

The discussion section of a research paper interprets the findings and discusses their implications for the research question, the literature review, and the field of study. It should also address the limitations of the study and suggest future research directions.

The conclusion section summarizes the main findings of the study, restates the research question and hypothesis, and provides a final reflection on the significance of the research.

The references section provides a list of all the sources cited in the paper, following a specific citation style such as APA, MLA or Chicago.

How to Write Research Paper

You can write Research Paper by the following guide:

• Choose a Topic: The first step is to select a topic that interests you and is relevant to your field of study. Brainstorm ideas and narrow down to a research question that is specific and researchable.
• Conduct a Literature Review: The literature review helps you identify the gap in the existing research and provides a basis for your research question. It also helps you to develop a theoretical framework and research hypothesis.
• Develop a Thesis Statement : The thesis statement is the main argument of your research paper. It should be clear, concise and specific to your research question.
• Plan your Research: Develop a research plan that outlines the methods, data sources, and data analysis procedures. This will help you to collect and analyze data effectively.
• Collect and Analyze Data: Collect data using various methods such as surveys, interviews, observations, or experiments. Analyze data using statistical tools or other qualitative methods.
• Organize your Paper : Organize your paper into sections such as Introduction, Literature Review, Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion. Ensure that each section is coherent and follows a logical flow.
• Write your Paper : Start by writing the introduction, followed by the literature review, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion. Ensure that your writing is clear, concise, and follows the required formatting and citation styles.
• Edit and Proofread your Paper: Review your paper for grammar and spelling errors, and ensure that it is well-structured and easy to read. Ask someone else to review your paper to get feedback and suggestions for improvement.
• Cite your Sources: Ensure that you properly cite all sources used in your research paper. This is essential for giving credit to the original authors and avoiding plagiarism.

Research Paper Example

Note : The below example research paper is for illustrative purposes only and is not an actual research paper. Actual research papers may have different structures, contents, and formats depending on the field of study, research question, data collection and analysis methods, and other factors. Students should always consult with their professors or supervisors for specific guidelines and expectations for their research papers.

Research Paper Example sample for Students:

Title: The Impact of Social Media on Mental Health among Young Adults

Abstract: This study aims to investigate the impact of social media use on the mental health of young adults. A literature review was conducted to examine the existing research on the topic. A survey was then administered to 200 university students to collect data on their social media use, mental health status, and perceived impact of social media on their mental health. The results showed that social media use is positively associated with depression, anxiety, and stress. The study also found that social comparison, cyberbullying, and FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) are significant predictors of mental health problems among young adults.

Introduction: Social media has become an integral part of modern life, particularly among young adults. While social media has many benefits, including increased communication and social connectivity, it has also been associated with negative outcomes, such as addiction, cyberbullying, and mental health problems. This study aims to investigate the impact of social media use on the mental health of young adults.

Literature Review: The literature review highlights the existing research on the impact of social media use on mental health. The review shows that social media use is associated with depression, anxiety, stress, and other mental health problems. The review also identifies the factors that contribute to the negative impact of social media, including social comparison, cyberbullying, and FOMO.

Methods : A survey was administered to 200 university students to collect data on their social media use, mental health status, and perceived impact of social media on their mental health. The survey included questions on social media use, mental health status (measured using the DASS-21), and perceived impact of social media on their mental health. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and regression analysis.

Results : The results showed that social media use is positively associated with depression, anxiety, and stress. The study also found that social comparison, cyberbullying, and FOMO are significant predictors of mental health problems among young adults.

Discussion : The study’s findings suggest that social media use has a negative impact on the mental health of young adults. The study highlights the need for interventions that address the factors contributing to the negative impact of social media, such as social comparison, cyberbullying, and FOMO.

Conclusion : In conclusion, social media use has a significant impact on the mental health of young adults. The study’s findings underscore the need for interventions that promote healthy social media use and address the negative outcomes associated with social media use. Future research can explore the effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing the negative impact of social media on mental health. Additionally, longitudinal studies can investigate the long-term effects of social media use on mental health.

Limitations : The study has some limitations, including the use of self-report measures and a cross-sectional design. The use of self-report measures may result in biased responses, and a cross-sectional design limits the ability to establish causality.

Implications: The study’s findings have implications for mental health professionals, educators, and policymakers. Mental health professionals can use the findings to develop interventions that address the negative impact of social media use on mental health. Educators can incorporate social media literacy into their curriculum to promote healthy social media use among young adults. Policymakers can use the findings to develop policies that protect young adults from the negative outcomes associated with social media use.

References :

• Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2019). Associations between screen time and lower psychological well-being among children and adolescents: Evidence from a population-based study. Preventive medicine reports, 15, 100918.
• Primack, B. A., Shensa, A., Escobar-Viera, C. G., Barrett, E. L., Sidani, J. E., Colditz, J. B., … & James, A. E. (2017). Use of multiple social media platforms and symptoms of depression and anxiety: A nationally-representative study among US young adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 1-9.
• Van der Meer, T. G., & Verhoeven, J. W. (2017). Social media and its impact on academic performance of students. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 16, 383-398.

Appendix : The survey used in this study is provided below.

Social Media and Mental Health Survey

• How often do you use social media per day?
• Less than 30 minutes
• 30 minutes to 1 hour
• 1 to 2 hours
• 2 to 4 hours
• More than 4 hours
• Which social media platforms do you use?
• Others (Please specify)
• How often do you experience the following on social media?
• Social comparison (comparing yourself to others)
• Cyberbullying
• Fear of Missing Out (FOMO)
• Have you ever experienced any of the following mental health problems in the past month?
• Do you think social media use has a positive or negative impact on your mental health?
• Very positive
• Somewhat positive
• Somewhat negative
• Very negative
• In your opinion, which factors contribute to the negative impact of social media on mental health?
• Social comparison
• In your opinion, what interventions could be effective in reducing the negative impact of social media on mental health?
• Education on healthy social media use
• Counseling for mental health problems caused by social media
• Social media detox programs
• Regulation of social media use

Thank you for your participation!

Applications of Research Paper

Research papers have several applications in various fields, including:

• Advancing knowledge: Research papers contribute to the advancement of knowledge by generating new insights, theories, and findings that can inform future research and practice. They help to answer important questions, clarify existing knowledge, and identify areas that require further investigation.
• Informing policy: Research papers can inform policy decisions by providing evidence-based recommendations for policymakers. They can help to identify gaps in current policies, evaluate the effectiveness of interventions, and inform the development of new policies and regulations.
• Improving practice: Research papers can improve practice by providing evidence-based guidance for professionals in various fields, including medicine, education, business, and psychology. They can inform the development of best practices, guidelines, and standards of care that can improve outcomes for individuals and organizations.
• Educating students : Research papers are often used as teaching tools in universities and colleges to educate students about research methods, data analysis, and academic writing. They help students to develop critical thinking skills, research skills, and communication skills that are essential for success in many careers.
• Fostering collaboration: Research papers can foster collaboration among researchers, practitioners, and policymakers by providing a platform for sharing knowledge and ideas. They can facilitate interdisciplinary collaborations and partnerships that can lead to innovative solutions to complex problems.

When to Write Research Paper

Research papers are typically written when a person has completed a research project or when they have conducted a study and have obtained data or findings that they want to share with the academic or professional community. Research papers are usually written in academic settings, such as universities, but they can also be written in professional settings, such as research organizations, government agencies, or private companies.

Here are some common situations where a person might need to write a research paper:

• For academic purposes: Students in universities and colleges are often required to write research papers as part of their coursework, particularly in the social sciences, natural sciences, and humanities. Writing research papers helps students to develop research skills, critical thinking skills, and academic writing skills.
• For publication: Researchers often write research papers to publish their findings in academic journals or to present their work at academic conferences. Publishing research papers is an important way to disseminate research findings to the academic community and to establish oneself as an expert in a particular field.
• To inform policy or practice : Researchers may write research papers to inform policy decisions or to improve practice in various fields. Research findings can be used to inform the development of policies, guidelines, and best practices that can improve outcomes for individuals and organizations.
• To share new insights or ideas: Researchers may write research papers to share new insights or ideas with the academic or professional community. They may present new theories, propose new research methods, or challenge existing paradigms in their field.

Purpose of Research Paper

The purpose of a research paper is to present the results of a study or investigation in a clear, concise, and structured manner. Research papers are written to communicate new knowledge, ideas, or findings to a specific audience, such as researchers, scholars, practitioners, or policymakers. The primary purposes of a research paper are:

• To contribute to the body of knowledge : Research papers aim to add new knowledge or insights to a particular field or discipline. They do this by reporting the results of empirical studies, reviewing and synthesizing existing literature, proposing new theories, or providing new perspectives on a topic.
• To inform or persuade: Research papers are written to inform or persuade the reader about a particular issue, topic, or phenomenon. They present evidence and arguments to support their claims and seek to persuade the reader of the validity of their findings or recommendations.
• To advance the field: Research papers seek to advance the field or discipline by identifying gaps in knowledge, proposing new research questions or approaches, or challenging existing assumptions or paradigms. They aim to contribute to ongoing debates and discussions within a field and to stimulate further research and inquiry.
• To demonstrate research skills: Research papers demonstrate the author’s research skills, including their ability to design and conduct a study, collect and analyze data, and interpret and communicate findings. They also demonstrate the author’s ability to critically evaluate existing literature, synthesize information from multiple sources, and write in a clear and structured manner.

Characteristics of Research Paper

Research papers have several characteristics that distinguish them from other forms of academic or professional writing. Here are some common characteristics of research papers:

• Evidence-based: Research papers are based on empirical evidence, which is collected through rigorous research methods such as experiments, surveys, observations, or interviews. They rely on objective data and facts to support their claims and conclusions.
• Structured and organized: Research papers have a clear and logical structure, with sections such as introduction, literature review, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion. They are organized in a way that helps the reader to follow the argument and understand the findings.
• Formal and objective: Research papers are written in a formal and objective tone, with an emphasis on clarity, precision, and accuracy. They avoid subjective language or personal opinions and instead rely on objective data and analysis to support their arguments.
• Citations and references: Research papers include citations and references to acknowledge the sources of information and ideas used in the paper. They use a specific citation style, such as APA, MLA, or Chicago, to ensure consistency and accuracy.
• Peer-reviewed: Research papers are often peer-reviewed, which means they are evaluated by other experts in the field before they are published. Peer-review ensures that the research is of high quality, meets ethical standards, and contributes to the advancement of knowledge in the field.
• Objective and unbiased: Research papers strive to be objective and unbiased in their presentation of the findings. They avoid personal biases or preconceptions and instead rely on the data and analysis to draw conclusions.

Advantages of Research Paper

Research papers have many advantages, both for the individual researcher and for the broader academic and professional community. Here are some advantages of research papers:

• Contribution to knowledge: Research papers contribute to the body of knowledge in a particular field or discipline. They add new information, insights, and perspectives to existing literature and help advance the understanding of a particular phenomenon or issue.
• Opportunity for intellectual growth: Research papers provide an opportunity for intellectual growth for the researcher. They require critical thinking, problem-solving, and creativity, which can help develop the researcher’s skills and knowledge.
• Career advancement: Research papers can help advance the researcher’s career by demonstrating their expertise and contributions to the field. They can also lead to new research opportunities, collaborations, and funding.
• Academic recognition: Research papers can lead to academic recognition in the form of awards, grants, or invitations to speak at conferences or events. They can also contribute to the researcher’s reputation and standing in the field.
• Impact on policy and practice: Research papers can have a significant impact on policy and practice. They can inform policy decisions, guide practice, and lead to changes in laws, regulations, or procedures.
• Advancement of society: Research papers can contribute to the advancement of society by addressing important issues, identifying solutions to problems, and promoting social justice and equality.

Limitations of Research Paper

Research papers also have some limitations that should be considered when interpreting their findings or implications. Here are some common limitations of research papers:

• Limited generalizability: Research findings may not be generalizable to other populations, settings, or contexts. Studies often use specific samples or conditions that may not reflect the broader population or real-world situations.
• Potential for bias : Research papers may be biased due to factors such as sample selection, measurement errors, or researcher biases. It is important to evaluate the quality of the research design and methods used to ensure that the findings are valid and reliable.
• Ethical concerns: Research papers may raise ethical concerns, such as the use of vulnerable populations or invasive procedures. Researchers must adhere to ethical guidelines and obtain informed consent from participants to ensure that the research is conducted in a responsible and respectful manner.
• Limitations of methodology: Research papers may be limited by the methodology used to collect and analyze data. For example, certain research methods may not capture the complexity or nuance of a particular phenomenon, or may not be appropriate for certain research questions.
• Publication bias: Research papers may be subject to publication bias, where positive or significant findings are more likely to be published than negative or non-significant findings. This can skew the overall findings of a particular area of research.
• Time and resource constraints: Research papers may be limited by time and resource constraints, which can affect the quality and scope of the research. Researchers may not have access to certain data or resources, or may be unable to conduct long-term studies due to practical limitations.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

You may also like

Thesis – Structure, Example and Writing Guide

APA Research Paper Format – Example, Sample and...

Research Paper Abstract – Writing Guide and...

Delimitations in Research – Types, Examples and...

Research Results Section – Writing Guide and...

Research Paper Format – Types, Examples and...

How To Write A Research Paper

Step-By-Step Tutorial With Examples + FREE Template

By: Derek Jansen (MBA) | Expert Reviewer: Dr Eunice Rautenbach | March 2024

For many students, crafting a strong research paper from scratch can feel like a daunting task – and rightly so! In this post, we’ll unpack what a research paper is, what it needs to do , and how to write one – in three easy steps. 🙂 

Overview: Writing A Research Paper

What (exactly) is a research paper.

• How to write a research paper
• Stage 1 : Topic & literature search
• Stage 2 : Structure & outline
• Stage 3 : Iterative writing
• Key takeaways

Let’s start by asking the most important question, “ What is a research paper? ”.

Simply put, a research paper is a scholarly written work where the writer (that’s you!) answers a specific question (this is called a research question ) through evidence-based arguments . Evidence-based is the keyword here. In other words, a research paper is different from an essay or other writing assignments that draw from the writer’s personal opinions or experiences. With a research paper, it’s all about building your arguments based on evidence (we’ll talk more about that evidence a little later).

Now, it’s worth noting that there are many different types of research papers , including analytical papers (the type I just described), argumentative papers, and interpretative papers. Here, we’ll focus on analytical papers , as these are some of the most common – but if you’re keen to learn about other types of research papers, be sure to check out the rest of the blog .

With that basic foundation laid, let’s get down to business and look at how to write a research paper .

Overview: The 3-Stage Process

While there are, of course, many potential approaches you can take to write a research paper, there are typically three stages to the writing process. So, in this tutorial, we’ll present a straightforward three-step process that we use when working with students at Grad Coach.

These three steps are:

• Finding a research topic and reviewing the existing literature
• Developing a provisional structure and outline for your paper, and
• Writing up your initial draft and then refining it iteratively

Let’s dig into each of these.

Need a helping hand?

Step 1: Find a topic and review the literature

As we mentioned earlier, in a research paper, you, as the researcher, will try to answer a question . More specifically, that’s called a research question , and it sets the direction of your entire paper. What’s important to understand though is that you’ll need to answer that research question with the help of high-quality sources – for example, journal articles, government reports, case studies, and so on. We’ll circle back to this in a minute.

The first stage of the research process is deciding on what your research question will be and then reviewing the existing literature (in other words, past studies and papers) to see what they say about that specific research question. In some cases, your professor may provide you with a predetermined research question (or set of questions). However, in many cases, you’ll need to find your own research question within a certain topic area.

Finding a strong research question hinges on identifying a meaningful research gap – in other words, an area that’s lacking in existing research. There’s a lot to unpack here, so if you wanna learn more, check out the plain-language explainer video below.

Once you’ve figured out which question (or questions) you’ll attempt to answer in your research paper, you’ll need to do a deep dive into the existing literature – this is called a “ literature search ”. Again, there are many ways to go about this, but your most likely starting point will be Google Scholar .

If you’re new to Google Scholar, think of it as Google for the academic world. You can start by simply entering a few different keywords that are relevant to your research question and it will then present a host of articles for you to review. What you want to pay close attention to here is the number of citations for each paper – the more citations a paper has, the more credible it is (generally speaking – there are some exceptions, of course).

Ideally, what you’re looking for are well-cited papers that are highly relevant to your topic. That said, keep in mind that citations are a cumulative metric , so older papers will often have more citations than newer papers – just because they’ve been around for longer. So, don’t fixate on this metric in isolation – relevance and recency are also very important.

Beyond Google Scholar, you’ll also definitely want to check out academic databases and aggregators such as Science Direct, PubMed, JStor and so on. These will often overlap with the results that you find in Google Scholar, but they can also reveal some hidden gems – so, be sure to check them out.

Once you’ve worked your way through all the literature, you’ll want to catalogue all this information in some sort of spreadsheet so that you can easily recall who said what, when and within what context. If you’d like, we’ve got a free literature spreadsheet that helps you do exactly that.

Step 2: Develop a structure and outline

With your research question pinned down and your literature digested and catalogued, it’s time to move on to planning your actual research paper .

It might sound obvious, but it’s really important to have some sort of rough outline in place before you start writing your paper. So often, we see students eagerly rushing into the writing phase, only to land up with a disjointed research paper that rambles on in multiple

Now, the secret here is to not get caught up in the fine details . Realistically, all you need at this stage is a bullet-point list that describes (in broad strokes) what you’ll discuss and in what order. It’s also useful to remember that you’re not glued to this outline – in all likelihood, you’ll chop and change some sections once you start writing, and that’s perfectly okay. What’s important is that you have some sort of roadmap in place from the start.

At this stage you might be wondering, “ But how should I structure my research paper? ”. Well, there’s no one-size-fits-all solution here, but in general, a research paper will consist of a few relatively standardised components:

• Introduction
• Literature review
• Methodology

Let’s take a look at each of these.

First up is the introduction section . As the name suggests, the purpose of the introduction is to set the scene for your research paper. There are usually (at least) four ingredients that go into this section – these are the background to the topic, the research problem and resultant research question , and the justification or rationale. If you’re interested, the video below unpacks the introduction section in more detail. 

The next section of your research paper will typically be your literature review . Remember all that literature you worked through earlier? Well, this is where you’ll present your interpretation of all that content . You’ll do this by writing about recent trends, developments, and arguments within the literature – but more specifically, those that are relevant to your research question . The literature review can oftentimes seem a little daunting, even to seasoned researchers, so be sure to check out our extensive collection of literature review content here .

With the introduction and lit review out of the way, the next section of your paper is the research methodology . In a nutshell, the methodology section should describe to your reader what you did (beyond just reviewing the existing literature) to answer your research question. For example, what data did you collect, how did you collect that data, how did you analyse that data and so on? For each choice, you’ll also need to justify why you chose to do it that way, and what the strengths and weaknesses of your approach were.

Now, it’s worth mentioning that for some research papers, this aspect of the project may be a lot simpler . For example, you may only need to draw on secondary sources (in other words, existing data sets). In some cases, you may just be asked to draw your conclusions from the literature search itself (in other words, there may be no data analysis at all). But, if you are required to collect and analyse data, you’ll need to pay a lot of attention to the methodology section. The video below provides an example of what the methodology section might look like.

By this stage of your paper, you will have explained what your research question is, what the existing literature has to say about that question, and how you analysed additional data to try to answer your question. So, the natural next step is to present your analysis of that data . This section is usually called the “results” or “analysis” section and this is where you’ll showcase your findings.

Depending on your school’s requirements, you may need to present and interpret the data in one section – or you might split the presentation and the interpretation into two sections. In the latter case, your “results” section will just describe the data, and the “discussion” is where you’ll interpret that data and explicitly link your analysis back to your research question. If you’re not sure which approach to take, check in with your professor or take a look at past papers to see what the norms are for your programme.

Alright – once you’ve presented and discussed your results, it’s time to wrap it up . This usually takes the form of the “ conclusion ” section. In the conclusion, you’ll need to highlight the key takeaways from your study and close the loop by explicitly answering your research question. Again, the exact requirements here will vary depending on your programme (and you may not even need a conclusion section at all) – so be sure to check with your professor if you’re unsure.

Step 3: Write and refine

Finally, it’s time to get writing. All too often though, students hit a brick wall right about here… So, how do you avoid this happening to you?

Well, there’s a lot to be said when it comes to writing a research paper (or any sort of academic piece), but we’ll share three practical tips to help you get started.

First and foremost , it’s essential to approach your writing as an iterative process. In other words, you need to start with a really messy first draft and then polish it over multiple rounds of editing. Don’t waste your time trying to write a perfect research paper in one go. Instead, take the pressure off yourself by adopting an iterative approach.

Secondly , it’s important to always lean towards critical writing , rather than descriptive writing. What does this mean? Well, at the simplest level, descriptive writing focuses on the “ what ”, while critical writing digs into the “ so what ” – in other words, the implications . If you’re not familiar with these two types of writing, don’t worry! You can find a plain-language explanation here.

Last but not least, you’ll need to get your referencing right. Specifically, you’ll need to provide credible, correctly formatted citations for the statements you make. We see students making referencing mistakes all the time and it costs them dearly. The good news is that you can easily avoid this by using a simple reference manager . If you don’t have one, check out our video about Mendeley, an easy (and free) reference management tool that you can start using today.

Recap: Key Takeaways

We’ve covered a lot of ground here. To recap, the three steps to writing a high-quality research paper are:

• To choose a research question and review the literature
• To plan your paper structure and draft an outline
• To take an iterative approach to writing, focusing on critical writing and strong referencing

Remember, this is just a b ig-picture overview of the research paper development process and there’s a lot more nuance to unpack. So, be sure to grab a copy of our free research paper template to learn more about how to write a research paper.

Can you help me with a full paper template for this Abstract:

Background: Energy and sports drinks have gained popularity among diverse demographic groups, including adolescents, athletes, workers, and college students. While often used interchangeably, these beverages serve distinct purposes, with energy drinks aiming to boost energy and cognitive performance, and sports drinks designed to prevent dehydration and replenish electrolytes and carbohydrates lost during physical exertion.

Objective: To assess the nutritional quality of energy and sports drinks in Egypt.

Material and Methods: A cross-sectional study assessed the nutrient contents, including energy, sugar, electrolytes, vitamins, and caffeine, of sports and energy drinks available in major supermarkets in Cairo, Alexandria, and Giza, Egypt. Data collection involved photographing all relevant product labels and recording nutritional information. Descriptive statistics and appropriate statistical tests were employed to analyze and compare the nutritional values of energy and sports drinks.

Results: The study analyzed 38 sports drinks and 42 energy drinks. Sports drinks were significantly more expensive than energy drinks, with higher net content and elevated magnesium, potassium, and vitamin C. Energy drinks contained higher concentrations of caffeine, sugars, and vitamins B2, B3, and B6.

Conclusion: Significant nutritional differences exist between sports and energy drinks, reflecting their intended uses. However, these beverages’ high sugar content and calorie loads raise health concerns. Proper labeling, public awareness, and responsible marketing are essential to guide safe consumption practices in Egypt.

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Print Friendly

Reference management. Clean and simple.

Writing your research paper

How to start your research paper [step-by-step guide]

All research papers have pretty much the same structure. If you can write one type of research paper, you can write another. Learn the steps to start and complete your research paper in our guide.

How to write a problem statement

What is a problem statement and how do you write one? This guide answers all your questions and includes an example of a problem statement.

How to write a research paper outline

Structuring the outline of your research paper early on is important. Read on to learn how to structure a research paper outline and to see examples, including an outline template.

How to write a research proposal

What is a research proposal and what should you use it for? This step-by-step guide teaches you how to structure and write a research proposal.

How to write an abstract

Not sure how to write an abstract for your paper? Clear your doubts with this guide, follow our tips, and start writing your abstract!

What are the different types of research papers?

Learn all you need to know about research papers, what differentiates a research paper from a thesis, and what types of research papers there are.

What is a research paper?

Are you confused about what a research paper actually is and what differentiates it from a thesis? Clarify it once and for all with our guide.

What is an appendix in a paper

Not sure what an appendix in a paper is? This guides defines what an appendix is and how to format one.

What is the abstract of a paper?

Not sure what the abstract of a paper is? Learn the definition of an abstract and how to format one in this guide with resources.

• PRO Courses Guides New Tech Help Pro Expert Videos About wikiHow Pro Upgrade Sign In
• EDIT Edit this Article
• EXPLORE Tech Help Pro About Us Random Article Quizzes Request a New Article Community Dashboard This Or That Game Happiness Hub Popular Categories Arts and Entertainment Artwork Books Movies Computers and Electronics Computers Phone Skills Technology Hacks Health Men's Health Mental Health Women's Health Relationships Dating Love Relationship Issues Hobbies and Crafts Crafts Drawing Games Education & Communication Communication Skills Personal Development Studying Personal Care and Style Fashion Hair Care Personal Hygiene Youth Personal Care School Stuff Dating All Categories Arts and Entertainment Finance and Business Home and Garden Relationship Quizzes Cars & Other Vehicles Food and Entertaining Personal Care and Style Sports and Fitness Computers and Electronics Health Pets and Animals Travel Education & Communication Hobbies and Crafts Philosophy and Religion Work World Family Life Holidays and Traditions Relationships Youth
• Browse Articles
• Learn Something New
• Quizzes Hot
• Happiness Hub
• This Or That Game
• Train Your Brain
• Explore More
• Support wikiHow
• About wikiHow
• Log in / Sign up
• Education and Communications
• College University and Postgraduate
• Academic Writing
• Research Papers

How to Write a Research Paper

Last Updated: February 18, 2024 Fact Checked

This article was co-authored by Chris Hadley, PhD . Chris Hadley, PhD is part of the wikiHow team and works on content strategy and data and analytics. Chris Hadley earned his PhD in Cognitive Psychology from UCLA in 2006. Chris' academic research has been published in numerous scientific journals. There are 14 references cited in this article, which can be found at the bottom of the page. This article has been fact-checked, ensuring the accuracy of any cited facts and confirming the authority of its sources. This article has been viewed 4,197,461 times.

Whether you’re in a history, literature, or science class, you’ll probably have to write a research paper at some point. It may seem daunting when you’re just starting out, but staying organized and budgeting your time can make the process a breeze. Research your topic, find reliable sources, and come up with a working thesis. Then create an outline and start drafting your paper. Be sure to leave plenty of time to make revisions, as editing is essential if you want to hand in your best work!

Sample Research Papers and Outlines

Researching Your Topic

• For instance, you might start with a general subject, like British decorative arts. Then, as you read, you home in on transferware and pottery. Ultimately, you focus on 1 potter in the 1780s who invented a way to mass-produce patterned tableware.

Tip: If you need to analyze a piece of literature, your task is to pull the work apart into literary elements and explain how the author uses those parts to make their point.

• Authoritative, credible sources include scholarly articles (especially those other authors reference), government websites, scientific studies, and reputable news bureaus. Additionally, check your sources' dates, and make sure the information you gather is up to date.
• Evaluate how other scholars have approached your topic. Identify authoritative sources or works that are accepted as the most important accounts of the subject matter. Additionally, look for debates among scholars, and ask yourself who presents the strongest evidence for their case. [3] X Trustworthy Source Purdue Online Writing Lab Trusted resource for writing and citation guidelines Go to source
• You’ll most likely need to include a bibliography or works cited page, so keep your sources organized. List your sources, format them according to your assigned style guide (such as MLA or Chicago ), and write 2 or 3 summary sentences below each one. [4] X Research source

• Imagine you’re a lawyer in a trial and are presenting a case to a jury. Think of your readers as the jurors; your opening statement is your thesis and you’ll present evidence to the jury to make your case.
• A thesis should be specific rather than vague, such as: “Josiah Spode’s improved formula for bone china enabled the mass production of transfer-printed wares, which expanded the global market for British pottery.”

Drafting Your Essay

• Your outline is your paper’s skeleton. After making the outline, all you’ll need to do is fill in the details.
• For easy reference, include your sources where they fit into your outline, like this: III. Spode vs. Wedgewood on Mass Production A. Spode: Perfected chemical formula with aims for fast production and distribution (Travis, 2002, 43) B. Wedgewood: Courted high-priced luxury market; lower emphasis on mass production (Himmelweit, 2001, 71) C. Therefore: Wedgewood, unlike Spode, delayed the expansion of the pottery market.

• For instance, your opening line could be, “Overlooked in the present, manufacturers of British pottery in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries played crucial roles in England’s Industrial Revolution.”
• After presenting your thesis, lay out your evidence, like this: “An examination of Spode’s innovative production and distribution techniques will demonstrate the importance of his contributions to the industry and Industrial Revolution at large.”

Tip: Some people prefer to write the introduction first and use it to structure the rest of the paper. However, others like to write the body, then fill in the introduction. Do whichever seems natural to you. If you write the intro first, keep in mind you can tweak it later to reflect your finished paper’s layout.

• After setting the context, you'd include a section on Josiah Spode’s company and what he did to make pottery easier to manufacture and distribute.
• Next, discuss how targeting middle class consumers increased demand and expanded the pottery industry globally.
• Then, you could explain how Spode differed from competitors like Wedgewood, who continued to court aristocratic consumers instead of expanding the market to the middle class.
• The right number of sections or paragraphs depends on your assignment. In general, shoot for 3 to 5, but check your prompt for your assigned length.

• If you bring up a counterargument, make sure it’s a strong claim that’s worth entertaining instead of ones that's weak and easily dismissed.
• Suppose, for instance, you’re arguing for the benefits of adding fluoride to toothpaste and city water. You could bring up a study that suggested fluoride produced harmful health effects, then explain how its testing methods were flawed.

• Sum up your argument, but don’t simply rewrite your introduction using slightly different wording. To make your conclusion more memorable, you could also connect your thesis to a broader topic or theme to make it more relatable to your reader.
• For example, if you’ve discussed the role of nationalism in World War I, you could conclude by mentioning nationalism’s reemergence in contemporary foreign affairs.

Revising Your Paper

• This is also a great opportunity to make sure your paper fulfills the parameters of the assignment and answers the prompt!
• It’s a good idea to put your essay aside for a few hours (or overnight, if you have time). That way, you can start editing it with fresh eyes.

Tip: Try to give yourself at least 2 or 3 days to revise your paper. It may be tempting to simply give your paper a quick read and use the spell-checker to make edits. However, revising your paper properly is more in-depth.

• The passive voice, such as “The door was opened by me,” feels hesitant and wordy. On the other hand, the active voice, or “I opened the door,” feels strong and concise.
• Each word in your paper should do a specific job. Try to avoid including extra words just to fill up blank space on a page or sound fancy.
• For instance, “The author uses pathos to appeal to readers’ emotions” is better than “The author utilizes pathos to make an appeal to the emotional core of those who read the passage.”

• Read your essay out loud to help ensure you catch every error. As you read, check for flow as well and, if necessary, tweak any spots that sound awkward. [13] X Trustworthy Source University of North Carolina Writing Center UNC's on-campus and online instructional service that provides assistance to students, faculty, and others during the writing process Go to source

• It’s wise to get feedback from one person who’s familiar with your topic and another who’s not. The person who knows about the topic can help ensure you’ve nailed all the details. The person who’s unfamiliar with the topic can help make sure your writing is clear and easy to understand.

Community Q&A

• Remember that your topic and thesis should be as specific as possible. Thanks Helpful 5 Not Helpful 0
• Researching, outlining, drafting, and revising are all important steps, so do your best to budget your time wisely. Try to avoid waiting until the last minute to write your paper. Thanks Helpful 6 Not Helpful 2

You Might Also Like

• ↑ https://writing.wisc.edu/handbook/assignments/planresearchpaper/
• ↑ https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/evaluating-print-sources/
• ↑ https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/conducting_research/research_overview/index.html
• ↑ https://poorvucenter.yale.edu/writing/graduate-writing-lab/writing-through-graduate-school/working-sources
• ↑ https://opentextbc.ca/writingforsuccess/chapter/chapter-5-putting-the-pieces-together-with-a-thesis-statement/
• ↑ https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/the_writing_process/developing_an_outline/index.html
• ↑ https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/introductions/
• ↑ https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/writingprocess/counterarguments
• ↑ https://writingcenter.fas.harvard.edu/pages/ending-essay-conclusions
• ↑ https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/revising-drafts/
• ↑ https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/formandstyle/writing/scholarlyvoice/activepassive
• ↑ https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/editing-and-proofreading/
• ↑ https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/reading-aloud/
• ↑ https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/the_writing_process/proofreading/index.html

About This Article

To write a research paper, start by researching your topic at the library, online, or using an academic database. As you conduct your research and take notes, zero in on a specific topic that you want to write about and create a 1-2 sentence thesis to state the focus of your paper. Then, create an outline that includes an introduction, 3 to 5 body paragraphs to present your arguments, and a conclusion to sum up your main points. Once you have your paper's structure organized, draft your paragraphs, focusing on 1 argument per paragraph. Use the information you found through your research to back up your claims and prove your thesis statement. Finally, proofread and revise your content until it's polished and ready to submit. For more information on researching and citing sources, read on! Did this summary help you? Yes No

• Send fan mail to authors

Reader Success Stories

Private And Discrete

Aug 2, 2020

Did this article help you?

Jan 3, 2018

Oct 29, 2016

Maronicha Lyles

Jul 24, 2016

Maxwell Ansah

Nov 22, 2019

Featured Articles

Trending Articles

Watch Articles

• Terms of Use
• Privacy Policy
• Do Not Sell or Share My Info
• Not Selling Info

Don’t miss out! Sign up for

wikiHow’s newsletter

How to Write a Research Paper: Parts of the Paper

• Choosing Your Topic
• Citation & Style Guides This link opens in a new window
• Critical Thinking
• Evaluating Information
• Parts of the Paper
• Writing Tips from UNC-Chapel Hill
• Librarian Contact

Parts of the Research Paper Papers should have a beginning, a middle, and an end. Your introductory paragraph should grab the reader's attention, state your main idea, and indicate how you will support it. The body of the paper should expand on what you have stated in the introduction. Finally, the conclusion restates the paper's thesis and should explain what you have learned, giving a wrap up of your main ideas.

1. The Title The title should be specific and indicate the theme of the research and what ideas it addresses. Use keywords that help explain your paper's topic to the reader. Try to avoid abbreviations and jargon. Think about keywords that people would use to search for your paper and include them in your title.

2. The Abstract The abstract is used by readers to get a quick overview of your paper. Typically, they are about 200 words in length (120 words minimum to  250 words maximum). The abstract should introduce the topic and thesis, and should provide a general statement about what you have found in your research. The abstract allows you to mention each major aspect of your topic and helps readers decide whether they want to read the rest of the paper. Because it is a summary of the entire research paper, it is often written last. 

3. The Introduction The introduction should be designed to attract the reader's attention and explain the focus of the research. You will introduce your overview of the topic,  your main points of information, and why this subject is important. You can introduce the current understanding and background information about the topic. Toward the end of the introduction, you add your thesis statement, and explain how you will provide information to support your research questions. This provides the purpose and focus for the rest of the paper.

4. Thesis Statement Most papers will have a thesis statement or main idea and supporting facts/ideas/arguments. State your main idea (something of interest or something to be proven or argued for or against) as your thesis statement, and then provide your supporting facts and arguments. A thesis statement is a declarative sentence that asserts the position a paper will be taking. It also points toward the paper's development. This statement should be both specific and arguable. Generally, the thesis statement will be placed at the end of the first paragraph of your paper. The remainder of your paper will support this thesis.

Students often learn to write a thesis as a first step in the writing process, but often, after research, a writer's viewpoint may change. Therefore a thesis statement may be one of the final steps in writing. 

Examples of Thesis Statements from Purdue OWL

5. The Literature Review The purpose of the literature review is to describe past important research and how it specifically relates to the research thesis. It should be a synthesis of the previous literature and the new idea being researched. The review should examine the major theories related to the topic to date and their contributors. It should include all relevant findings from credible sources, such as academic books and peer-reviewed journal articles. You will want  to:

• Explain how the literature helps the researcher understand the topic.
• Try to show connections and any disparities between the literature.
• Identify new ways to interpret prior research.
• Reveal any gaps that exist in the literature.

More about writing a literature review. . .

6. The Discussion ​The purpose of the discussion is to interpret and describe what you have learned from your research. Make the reader understand why your topic is important. The discussion should always demonstrate what you have learned from your readings (and viewings) and how that learning has made the topic evolve, especially from the short description of main points in the introduction.Explain any new understanding or insights you have had after reading your articles and/or books. Paragraphs should use transitioning sentences to develop how one paragraph idea leads to the next. The discussion will always connect to the introduction, your thesis statement, and the literature you reviewed, but it does not simply repeat or rearrange the introduction. You want to: 

• Demonstrate critical thinking, not just reporting back facts that you gathered.
• If possible, tell how the topic has evolved over the past and give it's implications for the future.
• Fully explain your main ideas with supporting information.
• Explain why your thesis is correct giving arguments to counter points.

7. The Conclusion A concluding paragraph is a brief summary of your main ideas and restates the paper's main thesis, giving the reader the sense that the stated goal of the paper has been accomplished. What have you learned by doing this research that you didn't know before? What conclusions have you drawn? You may also want to suggest further areas of study, improvement of research possibilities, etc. to demonstrate your critical thinking regarding your research.

• << Previous: Evaluating Information
• Next: Research >>
• Last Updated: Feb 13, 2024 8:35 AM
• URL: https://libguides.ucc.edu/research_paper

How to create a helpful research paper outline

Last updated

21 December 2023

Reviewed by

You need to structure your research paper in an orderly way that makes it easy for readers to follow your reasoning and supporting data. That's where a research paper outline can help.

Writing a research paper outline will help you arrange your ideas logically and allow your final paper to flow. It will make the entire process more manageable and help you work out which details to include and which are better left out.

• What is a research paper outline?

Write your research paper outline before starting your first draft. The outline provides a map of how you will structure your ideas throughout the paper. A research paper outline will help you to be more efficient when ordering the sections of your thesis, rather than trying to make structural changes after finishing an entire first draft.

An outline consists of the main topics and subtopics of your paper, listed in a logical order. The main topics will become the sections of your research paper, and the subtopics reveal the content you want to include or discuss under the main topics.

Under each subtopic, you can also jot down items you don't want to forget to include in your research paper, such as:

Topic ideas

Paragraph ideas

Direct quotes

Once you start listing these under your main topics, you can focus your thoughts as you plan and write the research paper using the evidence and data you collected and any additional information.

• Why use an outline?

If your research paper does not have a clear, logical order, readers may not understand the ideas you're trying to share, or they may lose interest and not bother to read the whole paper. An outline helps you structure your research paper so readers can easily connect the content, ideas, and theories you're trying to prove or maintain.

• Are there different kinds of research paper outlines?

Different kinds of research paper outlines might seem similar but have different purposes. You can select an outline type that provides a clear road map and thoroughly explores each point. 

Other types will help structure content logically or with a segmented flow and progression of ideas that align closely with the theme of your research.

• The 3 types of outlines

The three outline formats available to research paper writers are:

Alphanumeric or topic outlines

Sentence or full-sentence outlines

Decimal outlines

Let’s look at the differences between each type and see how one may be more beneficial than another, depending on the nature of your research.

This type of research paper outline allows you to segment main headings and subheadings with an alphanumeric arrangement.

The alphanumeric characters of Roman numerals, capital letters, numbers, and lowercase letters define the hierarchy of main topic headings, subtopic headings, and third- and fourth-tier subtopic headings. (e.g., I, A, 1, a)

This method uses minimal words to describe the main and subtopic headings. You'll mostly use this type of research paper outline to focus on the organization of the content while allowing you to review it for unrelated or irrelevant information.

Full-sentence outlines

You will format this type of research paper outline as an alphanumeric outline, using the same alphanumeric characters. However, it contains complete sentences rather than a few words for each main and subtopic heading.

This formatting method allows the writer to focus on looking for inaccuracies and inconsistencies in each point before starting the first draft.

Instead of using alphanumeric characters to define main headings, subheadings, and third- and fourth-tier subheadings, the decimal outline uses a decimal numbering system.

This system shows a logical progression of the content by using 1.0 for the main section heading (and 2.0, 3.0, etc., for subsequent sections), 1.1 for the subheading, 1.1.1 for a third-tier subheading, and 1.1.1.1 for the fourth-tier subheading.

The headings and subheadings will be just a few words, as in the alphanumerical research paper outline. Decimal outlines allow the writer to focus on the content's overall coherence, increasing your writing efficiency and reducing the time it takes to write your research paper.

• How to write a research paper outline

Before you begin your research paper outline, you need to determine your topic and gather your information. Let’s look at these steps first, then dive into how to write your outline.

1. Determine your topic

You'll need to establish a topic or the main point you intend to write about.

For example, you may want to research and write about whether influencers are the most beneficial way to promote products in your industry. This topic is the main point around which your essay will revolve.

2. Gather information

You'll need evidence, data, statistics, and facts to prove or disprove that influencers are the best method of promoting products in your industry.

You'll insert any of these things you collect to substantiate your findings into the outline to support your topic.

3. Determine the type of essay you'll be writing

There are many types of essays or research papers you can write. The kinds of essays include:

Argumentative: Builds logic and support for an argument

Cause and effect: Explains relationships between specific conditions and their results

Analytical: Presents a claim on what is being analyzed

Interpretive: Informative and persuasive explanations on how something is perceived

Experimental: Reports on experimental results and the reasoning behind the results

Review: Offers an understanding and analysis of primary sources on a given topic

Definition: Defines what a term or concept means

Persuasive: Uses logic and reason to show that one idea is more justified than another

Narrative: Tells a story of personal experience from the author’s point of view

Expository: Shows an objective view of a subject by exploring various angles

Descriptive: Describes objects, people, places, experiences, emotions, situations, etc.

Once you understand the essay format you are writing, you'll know how to structure your outline. 

4. Include basic sections

You'll begin to structure your outline using basic sections. Your main topic headings for these sections may include an introduction, multiple body paragraph sections, and a conclusion.

Once you establish the sections, you can insert the subtopics under each main topic heading.

5. Organize your outline

For example, if you're writing an argumentative essay taking the position that brand influencers (e.g., social media stars on Instagram or TikTok) are the best way to promote products in your industry, you will argue for that particular position.

You'll organize your argumentative essay outline with a main topic section supporting the position. The subtopics will include the reasoning behind your arguments, and the third-tier subtopics will contain the supporting evidence and data you gathered during your research.

You'll add another main topic section to counter and respond to any opposing arguments. Once you've organized and included all the information in this way, this will provide the structure to start your argumentative essay draft.

6. Consider compare-and-contrast essays

A compare-and-contrast essay is a form of essay that analyzes the differences between two opposing theories or subjects. If you have multiple subjects that are the same or different in just one aspect, you can write a point-by-point outline exploring each subject in terms of this characteristic.

The main topic headings will list that one characteristic, and the subtopic headings will list the subjects or items that are the same or different in relation to this characteristic.

Conversely, if you have multiple items to compare, but they have many characteristics that are similar or different, you can write a block method outline. The main topic headings will contain the items to be compared, while the subtopic headings will contain the aspects in which they are similar or different.

7. Consider advanced organizers for longer essays

An advanced organizer is a sentence that introduces new topics by connecting already-known information to new information. It can also prepare the reader for what they may expect to learn from the entire essay, or each section or paragraph.

Incorporating advanced organizers makes it easier for the reader to process and understand the information you are trying to convey. If you choose to use advanced organizers, depending on how often you want to use them throughout your paper, you can add them to your outline at the end of the introduction, the beginning of a section, or the beginning of each paragraph. 

• Do outlines need periods (full stops)?

If you're constructing alphanumerical or decimal topic outlines, they do not need periods because the entries are usually not complete sentences. However, outlines containing full sentences will need to be punctuated as any sentence is, including using periods.

• An example research paper outline

Here is an example of an alphanumerical outline that argues brand influencers are the best method of promoting products in a particular industry:

I.  Introduction

    A.  Background information about the issue and the position being argued.

    B.  Thesis statement: Influencers are the best way to promote products in this industry.

II.  Reasons that support the thesis statement

    A.  Reason or argument #1

           1.  Supporting evidence

           2.  Supporting evidence

    B.  Reason or argument #2

    C.  Reason or argument #3

          1.  Supporting evidence

          2.  Supporting evidence

III. Counterarguments and responses

       A.  Arguments from the other point of view

       B.  Rebuttals against those arguments

IV.  Conclusion

• How long is a thesis outline?

There is no set length for a research paper outline or thesis outline. Your outline can be as long as it needs to be to organize your thoughts constructively.

You can start with a short outline containing an introduction , background, methodology, data and analysis, and conclusion. Or you can break these sections into more specific segments according to the content you want to share.

Why make writing a research paper more complicated than it needs to be? Knowing the elements of an outline and how to insert them into a cohesive structure will make your final paper understandable and interesting to the reader.

Understanding how to outline a research paper will make the writing process more efficient and less time-consuming.

Should you be using a customer insights hub?

Do you want to discover previous research faster?

Do you share your research findings with others?

Do you analyze research data?

Start for free today, add your research, and get to key insights faster

Editor’s picks

Last updated: 18 April 2023

Last updated: 27 February 2023

Last updated: 5 February 2023

Last updated: 16 April 2023

Last updated: 16 August 2024

Last updated: 9 March 2023

Last updated: 30 April 2024

Last updated: 12 December 2023

Last updated: 11 March 2024

Last updated: 4 July 2024

Last updated: 6 March 2024

Last updated: 5 March 2024

Last updated: 13 May 2024

Latest articles

Related topics, .css-je19u9{-webkit-align-items:flex-end;-webkit-box-align:flex-end;-ms-flex-align:flex-end;align-items:flex-end;display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-flex-direction:row;-ms-flex-direction:row;flex-direction:row;-webkit-box-flex-wrap:wrap;-webkit-flex-wrap:wrap;-ms-flex-wrap:wrap;flex-wrap:wrap;-webkit-box-pack:center;-ms-flex-pack:center;-webkit-justify-content:center;justify-content:center;row-gap:0;text-align:center;max-width:671px;}@media (max-width: 1079px){.css-je19u9{max-width:400px;}.css-je19u9>span{white-space:pre;}}@media (max-width: 799px){.css-je19u9{max-width:400px;}.css-je19u9>span{white-space:pre;}} decide what to .css-1kiodld{max-height:56px;display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-align-items:center;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;}@media (max-width: 1079px){.css-1kiodld{display:none;}} build next, decide what to build next, log in or sign up.

Get started for free

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

13.1 Formatting a Research Paper

Learning objectives.

• Identify the major components of a research paper written using American Psychological Association (APA) style.
• Apply general APA style and formatting conventions in a research paper.

In this chapter, you will learn how to use APA style , the documentation and formatting style followed by the American Psychological Association, as well as MLA style , from the Modern Language Association. There are a few major formatting styles used in academic texts, including AMA, Chicago, and Turabian:

• AMA (American Medical Association) for medicine, health, and biological sciences
• APA (American Psychological Association) for education, psychology, and the social sciences
• Chicago—a common style used in everyday publications like magazines, newspapers, and books
• MLA (Modern Language Association) for English, literature, arts, and humanities
• Turabian—another common style designed for its universal application across all subjects and disciplines

While all the formatting and citation styles have their own use and applications, in this chapter we focus our attention on the two styles you are most likely to use in your academic studies: APA and MLA.

If you find that the rules of proper source documentation are difficult to keep straight, you are not alone. Writing a good research paper is, in and of itself, a major intellectual challenge. Having to follow detailed citation and formatting guidelines as well may seem like just one more task to add to an already-too-long list of requirements.

Following these guidelines, however, serves several important purposes. First, it signals to your readers that your paper should be taken seriously as a student’s contribution to a given academic or professional field; it is the literary equivalent of wearing a tailored suit to a job interview. Second, it shows that you respect other people’s work enough to give them proper credit for it. Finally, it helps your reader find additional materials if he or she wishes to learn more about your topic.

Furthermore, producing a letter-perfect APA-style paper need not be burdensome. Yes, it requires careful attention to detail. However, you can simplify the process if you keep these broad guidelines in mind:

• Work ahead whenever you can. Chapter 11 “Writing from Research: What Will I Learn?” includes tips for keeping track of your sources early in the research process, which will save time later on.
• Get it right the first time. Apply APA guidelines as you write, so you will not have much to correct during the editing stage. Again, putting in a little extra time early on can save time later.
• Use the resources available to you. In addition to the guidelines provided in this chapter, you may wish to consult the APA website at http://www.apa.org or the Purdue University Online Writing lab at http://owl.english.purdue.edu , which regularly updates its online style guidelines.

General Formatting Guidelines

This chapter provides detailed guidelines for using the citation and formatting conventions developed by the American Psychological Association, or APA. Writers in disciplines as diverse as astrophysics, biology, psychology, and education follow APA style. The major components of a paper written in APA style are listed in the following box.

These are the major components of an APA-style paper:

Body, which includes the following:

• Headings and, if necessary, subheadings to organize the content
• In-text citations of research sources
• References page

All these components must be saved in one document, not as separate documents.

The title page of your paper includes the following information:

• Title of the paper
• Author’s name
• Name of the institution with which the author is affiliated
• Header at the top of the page with the paper title (in capital letters) and the page number (If the title is lengthy, you may use a shortened form of it in the header.)

List the first three elements in the order given in the previous list, centered about one third of the way down from the top of the page. Use the headers and footers tool of your word-processing program to add the header, with the title text at the left and the page number in the upper-right corner. Your title page should look like the following example.

The next page of your paper provides an abstract , or brief summary of your findings. An abstract does not need to be provided in every paper, but an abstract should be used in papers that include a hypothesis. A good abstract is concise—about one hundred fifty to two hundred fifty words—and is written in an objective, impersonal style. Your writing voice will not be as apparent here as in the body of your paper. When writing the abstract, take a just-the-facts approach, and summarize your research question and your findings in a few sentences.

In Chapter 12 “Writing a Research Paper” , you read a paper written by a student named Jorge, who researched the effectiveness of low-carbohydrate diets. Read Jorge’s abstract. Note how it sums up the major ideas in his paper without going into excessive detail.

Write an abstract summarizing your paper. Briefly introduce the topic, state your findings, and sum up what conclusions you can draw from your research. Use the word count feature of your word-processing program to make sure your abstract does not exceed one hundred fifty words.

Depending on your field of study, you may sometimes write research papers that present extensive primary research, such as your own experiment or survey. In your abstract, summarize your research question and your findings, and briefly indicate how your study relates to prior research in the field.

Margins, Pagination, and Headings

APA style requirements also address specific formatting concerns, such as margins, pagination, and heading styles, within the body of the paper. Review the following APA guidelines.

Use these general guidelines to format the paper:

• Set the top, bottom, and side margins of your paper at 1 inch.
• Use double-spaced text throughout your paper.
• Use a standard font, such as Times New Roman or Arial, in a legible size (10- to 12-point).
• Use continuous pagination throughout the paper, including the title page and the references section. Page numbers appear flush right within your header.
• Section headings and subsection headings within the body of your paper use different types of formatting depending on the level of information you are presenting. Additional details from Jorge’s paper are provided.

Begin formatting the final draft of your paper according to APA guidelines. You may work with an existing document or set up a new document if you choose. Include the following:

• Your title page
• The abstract you created in Note 13.8 “Exercise 1”
• Correct headers and page numbers for your title page and abstract

APA style uses section headings to organize information, making it easy for the reader to follow the writer’s train of thought and to know immediately what major topics are covered. Depending on the length and complexity of the paper, its major sections may also be divided into subsections, sub-subsections, and so on. These smaller sections, in turn, use different heading styles to indicate different levels of information. In essence, you are using headings to create a hierarchy of information.

The following heading styles used in APA formatting are listed in order of greatest to least importance:

• Section headings use centered, boldface type. Headings use title case, with important words in the heading capitalized.
• Subsection headings use left-aligned, boldface type. Headings use title case.
• The third level uses left-aligned, indented, boldface type. Headings use a capital letter only for the first word, and they end in a period.
• The fourth level follows the same style used for the previous level, but the headings are boldfaced and italicized.
• The fifth level follows the same style used for the previous level, but the headings are italicized and not boldfaced.

Visually, the hierarchy of information is organized as indicated in Table 13.1 “Section Headings” .

Table 13.1 Section Headings

A college research paper may not use all the heading levels shown in Table 13.1 “Section Headings” , but you are likely to encounter them in academic journal articles that use APA style. For a brief paper, you may find that level 1 headings suffice. Longer or more complex papers may need level 2 headings or other lower-level headings to organize information clearly. Use your outline to craft your major section headings and determine whether any subtopics are substantial enough to require additional levels of headings.

Working with the document you developed in Note 13.11 “Exercise 2” , begin setting up the heading structure of the final draft of your research paper according to APA guidelines. Include your title and at least two to three major section headings, and follow the formatting guidelines provided above. If your major sections should be broken into subsections, add those headings as well. Use your outline to help you.

Because Jorge used only level 1 headings, his Exercise 3 would look like the following:

Citation Guidelines

In-text citations.

Throughout the body of your paper, include a citation whenever you quote or paraphrase material from your research sources. As you learned in Chapter 11 “Writing from Research: What Will I Learn?” , the purpose of citations is twofold: to give credit to others for their ideas and to allow your reader to follow up and learn more about the topic if desired. Your in-text citations provide basic information about your source; each source you cite will have a longer entry in the references section that provides more detailed information.

In-text citations must provide the name of the author or authors and the year the source was published. (When a given source does not list an individual author, you may provide the source title or the name of the organization that published the material instead.) When directly quoting a source, it is also required that you include the page number where the quote appears in your citation.

This information may be included within the sentence or in a parenthetical reference at the end of the sentence, as in these examples.

Epstein (2010) points out that “junk food cannot be considered addictive in the same way that we think of psychoactive drugs as addictive” (p. 137).

Here, the writer names the source author when introducing the quote and provides the publication date in parentheses after the author’s name. The page number appears in parentheses after the closing quotation marks and before the period that ends the sentence.

Addiction researchers caution that “junk food cannot be considered addictive in the same way that we think of psychoactive drugs as addictive” (Epstein, 2010, p. 137).

Here, the writer provides a parenthetical citation at the end of the sentence that includes the author’s name, the year of publication, and the page number separated by commas. Again, the parenthetical citation is placed after the closing quotation marks and before the period at the end of the sentence.

As noted in the book Junk Food, Junk Science (Epstein, 2010, p. 137), “junk food cannot be considered addictive in the same way that we think of psychoactive drugs as addictive.”

Here, the writer chose to mention the source title in the sentence (an optional piece of information to include) and followed the title with a parenthetical citation. Note that the parenthetical citation is placed before the comma that signals the end of the introductory phrase.

David Epstein’s book Junk Food, Junk Science (2010) pointed out that “junk food cannot be considered addictive in the same way that we think of psychoactive drugs as addictive” (p. 137).

Another variation is to introduce the author and the source title in your sentence and include the publication date and page number in parentheses within the sentence or at the end of the sentence. As long as you have included the essential information, you can choose the option that works best for that particular sentence and source.

Citing a book with a single author is usually a straightforward task. Of course, your research may require that you cite many other types of sources, such as books or articles with more than one author or sources with no individual author listed. You may also need to cite sources available in both print and online and nonprint sources, such as websites and personal interviews. Chapter 13 “APA and MLA Documentation and Formatting” , Section 13.2 “Citing and Referencing Techniques” and Section 13.3 “Creating a References Section” provide extensive guidelines for citing a variety of source types.

Writing at Work

APA is just one of several different styles with its own guidelines for documentation, formatting, and language usage. Depending on your field of interest, you may be exposed to additional styles, such as the following:

• MLA style. Determined by the Modern Languages Association and used for papers in literature, languages, and other disciplines in the humanities.
• Chicago style. Outlined in the Chicago Manual of Style and sometimes used for papers in the humanities and the sciences; many professional organizations use this style for publications as well.
• Associated Press (AP) style. Used by professional journalists.

References List

The brief citations included in the body of your paper correspond to the more detailed citations provided at the end of the paper in the references section. In-text citations provide basic information—the author’s name, the publication date, and the page number if necessary—while the references section provides more extensive bibliographical information. Again, this information allows your reader to follow up on the sources you cited and do additional reading about the topic if desired.

The specific format of entries in the list of references varies slightly for different source types, but the entries generally include the following information:

• The name(s) of the author(s) or institution that wrote the source
• The year of publication and, where applicable, the exact date of publication
• The full title of the source
• For books, the city of publication
• For articles or essays, the name of the periodical or book in which the article or essay appears
• For magazine and journal articles, the volume number, issue number, and pages where the article appears
• For sources on the web, the URL where the source is located

The references page is double spaced and lists entries in alphabetical order by the author’s last name. If an entry continues for more than one line, the second line and each subsequent line are indented five spaces. Review the following example. ( Chapter 13 “APA and MLA Documentation and Formatting” , Section 13.3 “Creating a References Section” provides extensive guidelines for formatting reference entries for different types of sources.)

In APA style, book and article titles are formatted in sentence case, not title case. Sentence case means that only the first word is capitalized, along with any proper nouns.

Key Takeaways

• Following proper citation and formatting guidelines helps writers ensure that their work will be taken seriously, give proper credit to other authors for their work, and provide valuable information to readers.
• Working ahead and taking care to cite sources correctly the first time are ways writers can save time during the editing stage of writing a research paper.
• APA papers usually include an abstract that concisely summarizes the paper.
• APA papers use a specific headings structure to provide a clear hierarchy of information.
• In APA papers, in-text citations usually include the name(s) of the author(s) and the year of publication.
• In-text citations correspond to entries in the references section, which provide detailed bibliographical information about a source.

Writing for Success Copyright © 2015 by University of Minnesota is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

• U.S. Locations
• UMGC Europe
• Learn Online
• Find Answers
• 855-655-8682
• Current Students

Online Guide to Writing and Research

The research process, explore more of umgc.

• Online Guide to Writing

Structuring the Research Paper

Formal research structure.

These are the primary purposes for formal research:

enter the discourse, or conversation, of other writers and scholars in your field

learn how others in your field use primary and secondary resources

find and understand raw data and information

For the formal academic research assignment, consider an organizational pattern typically used for primary academic research.  The pattern includes the following: introduction, methods, results, discussion, and conclusions/recommendations.

Usually, research papers flow from the general to the specific and back to the general in their organization. The introduction uses a general-to-specific movement in its organization, establishing the thesis and setting the context for the conversation. The methods and results sections are more detailed and specific, providing support for the generalizations made in the introduction. The discussion section moves toward an increasingly more general discussion of the subject, leading to the conclusions and recommendations, which then generalize the conversation again.

Sections of a Formal Structure

The introduction section.

Many students will find that writing a structured  introduction  gets them started and gives them the focus needed to significantly improve their entire paper. 

Introductions usually have three parts:

presentation of the problem statement, the topic, or the research inquiry

purpose and focus of your paper

summary or overview of the writer’s position or arguments

In the first part of the introduction—the presentation of the problem or the research inquiry—state the problem or express it so that the question is implied. Then, sketch the background on the problem and review the literature on it to give your readers a context that shows them how your research inquiry fits into the conversation currently ongoing in your subject area. 

In the second part of the introduction, state your purpose and focus. Here, you may even present your actual thesis. Sometimes your purpose statement can take the place of the thesis by letting your reader know your intentions. 

The third part of the introduction, the summary or overview of the paper, briefly leads readers through the discussion, forecasting the main ideas and giving readers a blueprint for the paper. 

The following example provides a blueprint for a well-organized introduction.

Example of an Introduction

Entrepreneurial Marketing: The Critical Difference

In an article in the Harvard Business Review, John A. Welsh and Jerry F. White remind us that “a small business is not a little big business.” An entrepreneur is not a multinational conglomerate but a profit-seeking individual. To survive, he must have a different outlook and must apply different principles to his endeavors than does the president of a large or even medium-sized corporation. Not only does the scale of small and big businesses differ, but small businesses also suffer from what the Harvard Business Review article calls “resource poverty.” This is a problem and opportunity that requires an entirely different approach to marketing. Where large ad budgets are not necessary or feasible, where expensive ad production squanders limited capital, where every marketing dollar must do the work of two dollars, if not five dollars or even ten, where a person’s company, capital, and material well-being are all on the line—that is, where guerrilla marketing can save the day and secure the bottom line (Levinson, 1984, p. 9).

By reviewing the introductions to research articles in the discipline in which you are writing your research paper, you can get an idea of what is considered the norm for that discipline. Study several of these before you begin your paper so that you know what may be expected. If you are unsure of the kind of introduction your paper needs, ask your professor for more information.  The introduction is normally written in present tense.

THE METHODS SECTION

The methods section of your research paper should describe in detail what methodology and special materials if any, you used to think through or perform your research. You should include any materials you used or designed for yourself, such as questionnaires or interview questions, to generate data or information for your research paper. You want to include any methodologies that are specific to your particular field of study, such as lab procedures for a lab experiment or data-gathering instruments for field research. The methods section is usually written in the past tense.

THE RESULTS SECTION

How you present the results of your research depends on what kind of research you did, your subject matter, and your readers’ expectations. 

Quantitative information —data that can be measured—can be presented systematically and economically in tables, charts, and graphs. Quantitative information includes quantities and comparisons of sets of data. 

Qualitative information , which includes brief descriptions, explanations, or instructions, can also be presented in prose tables. This kind of descriptive or explanatory information, however, is often presented in essay-like prose or even lists.

There are specific conventions for creating tables, charts, and graphs and organizing the information they contain. In general, you should use them only when you are sure they will enlighten your readers rather than confuse them. In the accompanying explanation and discussion, always refer to the graphic by number and explain specifically what you are referring to; you can also provide a caption for the graphic. The rule of thumb for presenting a graphic is first to introduce it by name, show it, and then interpret it. The results section is usually written in the past tense.

THE DISCUSSION SECTION

Your discussion section should generalize what you have learned from your research. One way to generalize is to explain the consequences or meaning of your results and then make your points that support and refer back to the statements you made in your introduction. Your discussion should be organized so that it relates directly to your thesis. You want to avoid introducing new ideas here or discussing tangential issues not directly related to the exploration and discovery of your thesis. The discussion section, along with the introduction, is usually written in the present tense.

THE CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION

Your conclusion ties your research to your thesis, binding together all the main ideas in your thinking and writing. By presenting the logical outcome of your research and thinking, your conclusion answers your research inquiry for your reader. Your conclusions should relate directly to the ideas presented in your introduction section and should not present any new ideas.

You may be asked to present your recommendations separately in your research assignment. If so, you will want to add some elements to your conclusion section. For example, you may be asked to recommend a course of action, make a prediction, propose a solution to a problem, offer a judgment, or speculate on the implications and consequences of your ideas. The conclusions and recommendations section is usually written in the present tense.

Key Takeaways

• For the formal academic research assignment, consider an organizational pattern typically used for primary academic research. 
•  The pattern includes the following: introduction, methods, results, discussion, and conclusions/recommendations.

Mailing Address: 3501 University Blvd. East, Adelphi, MD 20783 This work is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License . © 2022 UMGC. All links to external sites were verified at the time of publication. UMGC is not responsible for the validity or integrity of information located at external sites.

Table of Contents: Online Guide to Writing

Chapter 1: College Writing

How Does College Writing Differ from Workplace Writing?

What Is College Writing?

Why So Much Emphasis on Writing?

Chapter 2: The Writing Process

Doing Exploratory Research

Getting from Notes to Your Draft

Introduction

Prewriting - Techniques to Get Started - Mining Your Intuition

Prewriting: Targeting Your Audience

Prewriting: Techniques to Get Started

Prewriting: Understanding Your Assignment

Rewriting: Being Your Own Critic

Rewriting: Creating a Revision Strategy

Rewriting: Getting Feedback

Rewriting: The Final Draft

Techniques to Get Started - Outlining

Techniques to Get Started - Using Systematic Techniques

Thesis Statement and Controlling Idea

Writing: Getting from Notes to Your Draft - Freewriting

Writing: Getting from Notes to Your Draft - Summarizing Your Ideas

Writing: Outlining What You Will Write

Chapter 3: Thinking Strategies

A Word About Style, Voice, and Tone

A Word About Style, Voice, and Tone: Style Through Vocabulary and Diction

Critical Strategies and Writing

Critical Strategies and Writing: Analysis

Critical Strategies and Writing: Evaluation

Critical Strategies and Writing: Persuasion

Critical Strategies and Writing: Synthesis

Developing a Paper Using Strategies

Kinds of Assignments You Will Write

Patterns for Presenting Information

Patterns for Presenting Information: Critiques

Patterns for Presenting Information: Discussing Raw Data

Patterns for Presenting Information: General-to-Specific Pattern

Patterns for Presenting Information: Problem-Cause-Solution Pattern

Patterns for Presenting Information: Specific-to-General Pattern

Patterns for Presenting Information: Summaries and Abstracts

Supporting with Research and Examples

Writing Essay Examinations

Writing Essay Examinations: Make Your Answer Relevant and Complete

Writing Essay Examinations: Organize Thinking Before Writing

Writing Essay Examinations: Read and Understand the Question

Chapter 4: The Research Process

Planning and Writing a Research Paper

Planning and Writing a Research Paper: Ask a Research Question

Planning and Writing a Research Paper: Cite Sources

Planning and Writing a Research Paper: Collect Evidence

Planning and Writing a Research Paper: Decide Your Point of View, or Role, for Your Research

Planning and Writing a Research Paper: Draw Conclusions

Planning and Writing a Research Paper: Find a Topic and Get an Overview

Planning and Writing a Research Paper: Manage Your Resources

Planning and Writing a Research Paper: Outline

Planning and Writing a Research Paper: Survey the Literature

Planning and Writing a Research Paper: Work Your Sources into Your Research Writing

Research Resources: Where Are Research Resources Found? - Human Resources

Research Resources: What Are Research Resources?

Research Resources: Where Are Research Resources Found?

Research Resources: Where Are Research Resources Found? - Electronic Resources

Research Resources: Where Are Research Resources Found? - Print Resources

Structuring the Research Paper: Formal Research Structure

Structuring the Research Paper: Informal Research Structure

The Nature of Research

The Research Assignment: How Should Research Sources Be Evaluated?

The Research Assignment: When Is Research Needed?

The Research Assignment: Why Perform Research?

Chapter 5: Academic Integrity

Academic Integrity

Giving Credit to Sources

Giving Credit to Sources: Copyright Laws

Giving Credit to Sources: Documentation

Giving Credit to Sources: Style Guides

Integrating Sources

Practicing Academic Integrity

Practicing Academic Integrity: Keeping Accurate Records

Practicing Academic Integrity: Managing Source Material

Practicing Academic Integrity: Managing Source Material - Paraphrasing Your Source

Practicing Academic Integrity: Managing Source Material - Quoting Your Source

Practicing Academic Integrity: Managing Source Material - Summarizing Your Sources

Types of Documentation

Types of Documentation: Bibliographies and Source Lists

Types of Documentation: Citing World Wide Web Sources

Types of Documentation: In-Text or Parenthetical Citations

Types of Documentation: In-Text or Parenthetical Citations - APA Style

Types of Documentation: In-Text or Parenthetical Citations - CSE/CBE Style

Types of Documentation: In-Text or Parenthetical Citations - Chicago Style

Types of Documentation: In-Text or Parenthetical Citations - MLA Style

Types of Documentation: Note Citations

Chapter 6: Using Library Resources

Finding Library Resources

Chapter 7: Assessing Your Writing

How Is Writing Graded?

How Is Writing Graded?: A General Assessment Tool

The Draft Stage

The Draft Stage: The First Draft

The Draft Stage: The Revision Process and the Final Draft

The Draft Stage: Using Feedback

The Research Stage

Using Assessment to Improve Your Writing

Chapter 8: Other Frequently Assigned Papers

Reviews and Reaction Papers: Article and Book Reviews

Reviews and Reaction Papers: Reaction Papers

Writing Arguments

Writing Arguments: Adapting the Argument Structure

Writing Arguments: Purposes of Argument

Writing Arguments: References to Consult for Writing Arguments

Writing Arguments: Steps to Writing an Argument - Anticipate Active Opposition

Writing Arguments: Steps to Writing an Argument - Determine Your Organization

Writing Arguments: Steps to Writing an Argument - Develop Your Argument

Writing Arguments: Steps to Writing an Argument - Introduce Your Argument

Writing Arguments: Steps to Writing an Argument - State Your Thesis or Proposition

Writing Arguments: Steps to Writing an Argument - Write Your Conclusion

Writing Arguments: Types of Argument

Appendix A: Books to Help Improve Your Writing

Dictionaries

General Style Manuals

Researching on the Internet

Special Style Manuals

Writing Handbooks

Appendix B: Collaborative Writing and Peer Reviewing

Collaborative Writing: Assignments to Accompany the Group Project

Collaborative Writing: Informal Progress Report

Collaborative Writing: Issues to Resolve

Collaborative Writing: Methodology

Collaborative Writing: Peer Evaluation

Collaborative Writing: Tasks of Collaborative Writing Group Members

Collaborative Writing: Writing Plan

General Introduction

Peer Reviewing

Appendix C: Developing an Improvement Plan

Working with Your Instructor’s Comments and Grades

Appendix D: Writing Plan and Project Schedule

Devising a Writing Project Plan and Schedule

Reviewing Your Plan with Others

By using our website you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more about how we use cookies by reading our  Privacy Policy .

Purdue Online Writing Lab Purdue OWL® College of Liberal Arts

Writing a Research Paper

Welcome to the Purdue OWL

This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University. When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice.

Copyright ©1995-2018 by The Writing Lab & The OWL at Purdue and Purdue University. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use.

The Research Paper

There will come a time in most students' careers when they are assigned a research paper. Such an assignment often creates a great deal of unneeded anxiety in the student, which may result in procrastination and a feeling of confusion and inadequacy. This anxiety frequently stems from the fact that many students are unfamiliar and inexperienced with this genre of writing. Never fear—inexperience and unfamiliarity are situations you can change through practice! Writing a research paper is an essential aspect of academics and should not be avoided on account of one's anxiety. In fact, the process of writing a research paper can be one of the more rewarding experiences one may encounter in academics. What is more, many students will continue to do research throughout their careers, which is one of the reasons this topic is so important.

Becoming an experienced researcher and writer in any field or discipline takes a great deal of practice. There are few individuals for whom this process comes naturally. Remember, even the most seasoned academic veterans have had to learn how to write a research paper at some point in their career. Therefore, with diligence, organization, practice, a willingness to learn (and to make mistakes!), and, perhaps most important of all, patience, students will find that they can achieve great things through their research and writing.

The pages in this section cover the following topic areas related to the process of writing a research paper:

• Genre - This section will provide an overview for understanding the difference between an analytical and argumentative research paper.
• Choosing a Topic - This section will guide the student through the process of choosing topics, whether the topic be one that is assigned or one that the student chooses themselves.
• Identifying an Audience - This section will help the student understand the often times confusing topic of audience by offering some basic guidelines for the process.
• Where Do I Begin - This section concludes the handout by offering several links to resources at Purdue, and also provides an overview of the final stages of writing a research paper.

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List

How to Write and Publish a Research Paper for a Peer-Reviewed Journal

Clara busse.

1 Department of Maternal and Child Health, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, 135 Dauer Dr, 27599 Chapel Hill, NC USA

Ella August

2 Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029 USA

Associated Data

Communicating research findings is an essential step in the research process. Often, peer-reviewed journals are the forum for such communication, yet many researchers are never taught how to write a publishable scientific paper. In this article, we explain the basic structure of a scientific paper and describe the information that should be included in each section. We also identify common pitfalls for each section and recommend strategies to avoid them. Further, we give advice about target journal selection and authorship. In the online resource 1 , we provide an example of a high-quality scientific paper, with annotations identifying the elements we describe in this article.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s13187-020-01751-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Introduction

Writing a scientific paper is an important component of the research process, yet researchers often receive little formal training in scientific writing. This is especially true in low-resource settings. In this article, we explain why choosing a target journal is important, give advice about authorship, provide a basic structure for writing each section of a scientific paper, and describe common pitfalls and recommendations for each section. In the online resource 1 , we also include an annotated journal article that identifies the key elements and writing approaches that we detail here. Before you begin your research, make sure you have ethical clearance from all relevant ethical review boards.

Select a Target Journal Early in the Writing Process

We recommend that you select a “target journal” early in the writing process; a “target journal” is the journal to which you plan to submit your paper. Each journal has a set of core readers and you should tailor your writing to this readership. For example, if you plan to submit a manuscript about vaping during pregnancy to a pregnancy-focused journal, you will need to explain what vaping is because readers of this journal may not have a background in this topic. However, if you were to submit that same article to a tobacco journal, you would not need to provide as much background information about vaping.

Information about a journal’s core readership can be found on its website, usually in a section called “About this journal” or something similar. For example, the Journal of Cancer Education presents such information on the “Aims and Scope” page of its website, which can be found here: https://www.springer.com/journal/13187/aims-and-scope .

Peer reviewer guidelines from your target journal are an additional resource that can help you tailor your writing to the journal and provide additional advice about crafting an effective article [ 1 ]. These are not always available, but it is worth a quick web search to find out.

Identify Author Roles Early in the Process

Early in the writing process, identify authors, determine the order of authors, and discuss the responsibilities of each author. Standard author responsibilities have been identified by The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) [ 2 ]. To set clear expectations about each team member’s responsibilities and prevent errors in communication, we also suggest outlining more detailed roles, such as who will draft each section of the manuscript, write the abstract, submit the paper electronically, serve as corresponding author, and write the cover letter. It is best to formalize this agreement in writing after discussing it, circulating the document to the author team for approval. We suggest creating a title page on which all authors are listed in the agreed-upon order. It may be necessary to adjust authorship roles and order during the development of the paper. If a new author order is agreed upon, be sure to update the title page in the manuscript draft.

In the case where multiple papers will result from a single study, authors should discuss who will author each paper. Additionally, authors should agree on a deadline for each paper and the lead author should take responsibility for producing an initial draft by this deadline.

Structure of the Introduction Section

The introduction section should be approximately three to five paragraphs in length. Look at examples from your target journal to decide the appropriate length. This section should include the elements shown in Fig.  1 . Begin with a general context, narrowing to the specific focus of the paper. Include five main elements: why your research is important, what is already known about the topic, the “gap” or what is not yet known about the topic, why it is important to learn the new information that your research adds, and the specific research aim(s) that your paper addresses. Your research aim should address the gap you identified. Be sure to add enough background information to enable readers to understand your study. Table ​ Table1 1 provides common introduction section pitfalls and recommendations for addressing them.

The main elements of the introduction section of an original research article. Often, the elements overlap

Common introduction section pitfalls and recommendations

Methods Section

The purpose of the methods section is twofold: to explain how the study was done in enough detail to enable its replication and to provide enough contextual detail to enable readers to understand and interpret the results. In general, the essential elements of a methods section are the following: a description of the setting and participants, the study design and timing, the recruitment and sampling, the data collection process, the dataset, the dependent and independent variables, the covariates, the analytic approach for each research objective, and the ethical approval. The hallmark of an exemplary methods section is the justification of why each method was used. Table ​ Table2 2 provides common methods section pitfalls and recommendations for addressing them.

Common methods section pitfalls and recommendations

Results Section

The focus of the results section should be associations, or lack thereof, rather than statistical tests. Two considerations should guide your writing here. First, the results should present answers to each part of the research aim. Second, return to the methods section to ensure that the analysis and variables for each result have been explained.

Begin the results section by describing the number of participants in the final sample and details such as the number who were approached to participate, the proportion who were eligible and who enrolled, and the number of participants who dropped out. The next part of the results should describe the participant characteristics. After that, you may organize your results by the aim or by putting the most exciting results first. Do not forget to report your non-significant associations. These are still findings.

Tables and figures capture the reader’s attention and efficiently communicate your main findings [ 3 ]. Each table and figure should have a clear message and should complement, rather than repeat, the text. Tables and figures should communicate all salient details necessary for a reader to understand the findings without consulting the text. Include information on comparisons and tests, as well as information about the sample and timing of the study in the title, legend, or in a footnote. Note that figures are often more visually interesting than tables, so if it is feasible to make a figure, make a figure. To avoid confusing the reader, either avoid abbreviations in tables and figures, or define them in a footnote. Note that there should not be citations in the results section and you should not interpret results here. Table ​ Table3 3 provides common results section pitfalls and recommendations for addressing them.

Common results section pitfalls and recommendations

Discussion Section

Opposite the introduction section, the discussion should take the form of a right-side-up triangle beginning with interpretation of your results and moving to general implications (Fig.  2 ). This section typically begins with a restatement of the main findings, which can usually be accomplished with a few carefully-crafted sentences.

Major elements of the discussion section of an original research article. Often, the elements overlap

Next, interpret the meaning or explain the significance of your results, lifting the reader’s gaze from the study’s specific findings to more general applications. Then, compare these study findings with other research. Are these findings in agreement or disagreement with those from other studies? Does this study impart additional nuance to well-accepted theories? Situate your findings within the broader context of scientific literature, then explain the pathways or mechanisms that might give rise to, or explain, the results.

Journals vary in their approach to strengths and limitations sections: some are embedded paragraphs within the discussion section, while some mandate separate section headings. Keep in mind that every study has strengths and limitations. Candidly reporting yours helps readers to correctly interpret your research findings.

The next element of the discussion is a summary of the potential impacts and applications of the research. Should these results be used to optimally design an intervention? Does the work have implications for clinical protocols or public policy? These considerations will help the reader to further grasp the possible impacts of the presented work.

Finally, the discussion should conclude with specific suggestions for future work. Here, you have an opportunity to illuminate specific gaps in the literature that compel further study. Avoid the phrase “future research is necessary” because the recommendation is too general to be helpful to readers. Instead, provide substantive and specific recommendations for future studies. Table ​ Table4 4 provides common discussion section pitfalls and recommendations for addressing them.

Common discussion section pitfalls and recommendations

Follow the Journal’s Author Guidelines

After you select a target journal, identify the journal’s author guidelines to guide the formatting of your manuscript and references. Author guidelines will often (but not always) include instructions for titles, cover letters, and other components of a manuscript submission. Read the guidelines carefully. If you do not follow the guidelines, your article will be sent back to you.

Finally, do not submit your paper to more than one journal at a time. Even if this is not explicitly stated in the author guidelines of your target journal, it is considered inappropriate and unprofessional.

Your title should invite readers to continue reading beyond the first page [ 4 , 5 ]. It should be informative and interesting. Consider describing the independent and dependent variables, the population and setting, the study design, the timing, and even the main result in your title. Because the focus of the paper can change as you write and revise, we recommend you wait until you have finished writing your paper before composing the title.

Be sure that the title is useful for potential readers searching for your topic. The keywords you select should complement those in your title to maximize the likelihood that a researcher will find your paper through a database search. Avoid using abbreviations in your title unless they are very well known, such as SNP, because it is more likely that someone will use a complete word rather than an abbreviation as a search term to help readers find your paper.

After you have written a complete draft, use the checklist (Fig. ​ (Fig.3) 3 ) below to guide your revisions and editing. Additional resources are available on writing the abstract and citing references [ 5 ]. When you feel that your work is ready, ask a trusted colleague or two to read the work and provide informal feedback. The box below provides a checklist that summarizes the key points offered in this article.

Checklist for manuscript quality

(PDF 362 kb)

Acknowledgments

Ella August is grateful to the Sustainable Sciences Institute for mentoring her in training researchers on writing and publishing their research.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

Data Availability

Compliance with ethical standards.

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

How to Write a Research Paper Introduction (with Examples)

The research paper introduction section, along with the Title and Abstract, can be considered the face of any research paper. The following article is intended to guide you in organizing and writing the research paper introduction for a quality academic article or dissertation.

The research paper introduction aims to present the topic to the reader. A study will only be accepted for publishing if you can ascertain that the available literature cannot answer your research question. So it is important to ensure that you have read important studies on that particular topic, especially those within the last five to ten years, and that they are properly referenced in this section. 1 What should be included in the research paper introduction is decided by what you want to tell readers about the reason behind the research and how you plan to fill the knowledge gap. The best research paper introduction provides a systemic review of existing work and demonstrates additional work that needs to be done. It needs to be brief, captivating, and well-referenced; a well-drafted research paper introduction will help the researcher win half the battle.

The introduction for a research paper is where you set up your topic and approach for the reader. It has several key goals:

• Present your research topic
• Capture reader interest
• Summarize existing research
• Position your own approach
• Define your specific research problem and problem statement
• Highlight the novelty and contributions of the study
• Give an overview of the paper’s structure

The research paper introduction can vary in size and structure depending on whether your paper presents the results of original empirical research or is a review paper. Some research paper introduction examples are only half a page while others are a few pages long. In many cases, the introduction will be shorter than all of the other sections of your paper; its length depends on the size of your paper as a whole.

• Break through writer’s block. Write your research paper introduction with Paperpal Copilot

Table of Contents

What is the introduction for a research paper, why is the introduction important in a research paper, craft a compelling introduction section with paperpal. try now, 1. introduce the research topic:, 2. determine a research niche:, 3. place your research within the research niche:, craft accurate research paper introductions with paperpal. start writing now, frequently asked questions on research paper introduction, key points to remember.

The introduction in a research paper is placed at the beginning to guide the reader from a broad subject area to the specific topic that your research addresses. They present the following information to the reader

• Scope: The topic covered in the research paper
• Context: Background of your topic
• Importance: Why your research matters in that particular area of research and the industry problem that can be targeted

The research paper introduction conveys a lot of information and can be considered an essential roadmap for the rest of your paper. A good introduction for a research paper is important for the following reasons:

• It stimulates your reader’s interest: A good introduction section can make your readers want to read your paper by capturing their interest. It informs the reader what they are going to learn and helps determine if the topic is of interest to them.
• It helps the reader understand the research background: Without a clear introduction, your readers may feel confused and even struggle when reading your paper. A good research paper introduction will prepare them for the in-depth research to come. It provides you the opportunity to engage with the readers and demonstrate your knowledge and authority on the specific topic.
• It explains why your research paper is worth reading: Your introduction can convey a lot of information to your readers. It introduces the topic, why the topic is important, and how you plan to proceed with your research.
• It helps guide the reader through the rest of the paper: The research paper introduction gives the reader a sense of the nature of the information that will support your arguments and the general organization of the paragraphs that will follow. It offers an overview of what to expect when reading the main body of your paper.

What are the parts of introduction in the research?

A good research paper introduction section should comprise three main elements: 2

• What is known: This sets the stage for your research. It informs the readers of what is known on the subject.
• What is lacking: This is aimed at justifying the reason for carrying out your research. This could involve investigating a new concept or method or building upon previous research.
• What you aim to do: This part briefly states the objectives of your research and its major contributions. Your detailed hypothesis will also form a part of this section.

How to write a research paper introduction?

The first step in writing the research paper introduction is to inform the reader what your topic is and why it’s interesting or important. This is generally accomplished with a strong opening statement. The second step involves establishing the kinds of research that have been done and ending with limitations or gaps in the research that you intend to address. Finally, the research paper introduction clarifies how your own research fits in and what problem it addresses. If your research involved testing hypotheses, these should be stated along with your research question. The hypothesis should be presented in the past tense since it will have been tested by the time you are writing the research paper introduction.

The following key points, with examples, can guide you when writing the research paper introduction section:

• Highlight the importance of the research field or topic
• Describe the background of the topic
• Present an overview of current research on the topic

Example: The inclusion of experiential and competency-based learning has benefitted electronics engineering education. Industry partnerships provide an excellent alternative for students wanting to engage in solving real-world challenges. Industry-academia participation has grown in recent years due to the need for skilled engineers with practical training and specialized expertise. However, from the educational perspective, many activities are needed to incorporate sustainable development goals into the university curricula and consolidate learning innovation in universities.

• Reveal a gap in existing research or oppose an existing assumption
• Formulate the research question

Example: There have been plausible efforts to integrate educational activities in higher education electronics engineering programs. However, very few studies have considered using educational research methods for performance evaluation of competency-based higher engineering education, with a focus on technical and or transversal skills. To remedy the current need for evaluating competencies in STEM fields and providing sustainable development goals in engineering education, in this study, a comparison was drawn between study groups without and with industry partners.

• State the purpose of your study
• Highlight the key characteristics of your study
• Describe important results
• Highlight the novelty of the study.
• Offer a brief overview of the structure of the paper.

Example: The study evaluates the main competency needed in the applied electronics course, which is a fundamental core subject for many electronics engineering undergraduate programs. We compared two groups, without and with an industrial partner, that offered real-world projects to solve during the semester. This comparison can help determine significant differences in both groups in terms of developing subject competency and achieving sustainable development goals.

Write a Research Paper Introduction in Minutes with Paperpal

Paperpal Copilot is a generative AI-powered academic writing assistant. It’s trained on millions of published scholarly articles and over 20 years of STM experience. Paperpal Copilot helps authors write better and faster with:

• Real-time writing suggestions
• In-depth checks for language and grammar correction
• Paraphrasing to add variety, ensure academic tone, and trim text to meet journal limits

With Paperpal Copilot, create a research paper introduction effortlessly. In this step-by-step guide, we’ll walk you through how Paperpal transforms your initial ideas into a polished and publication-ready introduction.

How to use Paperpal to write the Introduction section

Step 1: Sign up on Paperpal and click on the Copilot feature, under this choose Outlines > Research Article > Introduction

Step 2: Add your unstructured notes or initial draft, whether in English or another language, to Paperpal, which is to be used as the base for your content.

Step 3: Fill in the specifics, such as your field of study, brief description or details you want to include, which will help the AI generate the outline for your Introduction.

Step 4: Use this outline and sentence suggestions to develop your content, adding citations where needed and modifying it to align with your specific research focus.

Step 5: Turn to Paperpal’s granular language checks to refine your content, tailor it to reflect your personal writing style, and ensure it effectively conveys your message.

You can use the same process to develop each section of your article, and finally your research paper in half the time and without any of the stress.

The purpose of the research paper introduction is to introduce the reader to the problem definition, justify the need for the study, and describe the main theme of the study. The aim is to gain the reader’s attention by providing them with necessary background information and establishing the main purpose and direction of the research.

The length of the research paper introduction can vary across journals and disciplines. While there are no strict word limits for writing the research paper introduction, an ideal length would be one page, with a maximum of 400 words over 1-4 paragraphs. Generally, it is one of the shorter sections of the paper as the reader is assumed to have at least a reasonable knowledge about the topic. 2 For example, for a study evaluating the role of building design in ensuring fire safety, there is no need to discuss definitions and nature of fire in the introduction; you could start by commenting upon the existing practices for fire safety and how your study will add to the existing knowledge and practice.

When deciding what to include in the research paper introduction, the rest of the paper should also be considered. The aim is to introduce the reader smoothly to the topic and facilitate an easy read without much dependency on external sources. 3 Below is a list of elements you can include to prepare a research paper introduction outline and follow it when you are writing the research paper introduction. Topic introduction: This can include key definitions and a brief history of the topic. Research context and background: Offer the readers some general information and then narrow it down to specific aspects. Details of the research you conducted: A brief literature review can be included to support your arguments or line of thought. Rationale for the study: This establishes the relevance of your study and establishes its importance. Importance of your research: The main contributions are highlighted to help establish the novelty of your study Research hypothesis: Introduce your research question and propose an expected outcome. Organization of the paper: Include a short paragraph of 3-4 sentences that highlights your plan for the entire paper

Cite only works that are most relevant to your topic; as a general rule, you can include one to three. Note that readers want to see evidence of original thinking. So it is better to avoid using too many references as it does not leave much room for your personal standpoint to shine through. Citations in your research paper introduction support the key points, and the number of citations depend on the subject matter and the point discussed. If the research paper introduction is too long or overflowing with citations, it is better to cite a few review articles rather than the individual articles summarized in the review. A good point to remember when citing research papers in the introduction section is to include at least one-third of the references in the introduction.

The literature review plays a significant role in the research paper introduction section. A good literature review accomplishes the following: Introduces the topic – Establishes the study’s significance – Provides an overview of the relevant literature – Provides context for the study using literature – Identifies knowledge gaps However, remember to avoid making the following mistakes when writing a research paper introduction: Do not use studies from the literature review to aggressively support your research Avoid direct quoting Do not allow literature review to be the focus of this section. Instead, the literature review should only aid in setting a foundation for the manuscript.

Remember the following key points for writing a good research paper introduction: 4

• Avoid stuffing too much general information: Avoid including what an average reader would know and include only that information related to the problem being addressed in the research paper introduction. For example, when describing a comparative study of non-traditional methods for mechanical design optimization, information related to the traditional methods and differences between traditional and non-traditional methods would not be relevant. In this case, the introduction for the research paper should begin with the state-of-the-art non-traditional methods and methods to evaluate the efficiency of newly developed algorithms.
• Avoid packing too many references: Cite only the required works in your research paper introduction. The other works can be included in the discussion section to strengthen your findings.
• Avoid extensive criticism of previous studies: Avoid being overly critical of earlier studies while setting the rationale for your study. A better place for this would be the Discussion section, where you can highlight the advantages of your method.
• Avoid describing conclusions of the study: When writing a research paper introduction remember not to include the findings of your study. The aim is to let the readers know what question is being answered. The actual answer should only be given in the Results and Discussion section.

To summarize, the research paper introduction section should be brief yet informative. It should convince the reader the need to conduct the study and motivate him to read further. If you’re feeling stuck or unsure, choose trusted AI academic writing assistants like Paperpal to effortlessly craft your research paper introduction and other sections of your research article.

1. Jawaid, S. A., & Jawaid, M. (2019). How to write introduction and discussion. Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia, 13(Suppl 1), S18.

2. Dewan, P., & Gupta, P. (2016). Writing the title, abstract and introduction: Looks matter!. Indian pediatrics, 53, 235-241.

3. Cetin, S., & Hackam, D. J. (2005). An approach to the writing of a scientific Manuscript1. Journal of Surgical Research, 128(2), 165-167.

4. Bavdekar, S. B. (2015). Writing introduction: Laying the foundations of a research paper. Journal of the Association of Physicians of India, 63(7), 44-6.

Paperpal is a comprehensive AI writing toolkit that helps students and researchers achieve 2x the writing in half the time. It leverages 21+ years of STM experience and insights from millions of research articles to provide in-depth academic writing, language editing, and submission readiness support to help you write better, faster.  

Get accurate academic translations, rewriting support, grammar checks, vocabulary suggestions, and generative AI assistance that delivers human precision at machine speed. Try for free or upgrade to Paperpal Prime starting at US$19 a month to access premium features, including consistency, plagiarism, and 30+ submission readiness checks to help you succeed.  

Experience the future of academic writing – Sign up to Paperpal and start writing for free!  

Related Reads:

• Scientific Writing Style Guides Explained
• 5 Reasons for Rejection After Peer Review
• Ethical Research Practices For Research with Human Subjects
• 8 Most Effective Ways to Increase Motivation for Thesis Writing 

Practice vs. Practise: Learn the Difference

Academic paraphrasing: why paperpal’s rewrite should be your first choice , you may also like, how to write your research paper in apa..., how to choose a dissertation topic, how to write a phd research proposal, how to write an academic paragraph (step-by-step guide), research funding basics: what should a grant proposal..., how to write an abstract in research papers..., how to write dissertation acknowledgements, how to write the first draft of a..., mla works cited page: format, template & examples, how to write a high-quality conference paper.

Jump to navigation

Queer Studies Conference: Cultivating Resilience, Centering Joy

Cultivating Resilience, Centering Joy: Queer Studies Conference 2025 

March 28-30th, 2023 in Asheville, NC

The UNC Asheville Queer Studies Conference (established in 1998) attracts a diverse audience of activists, academics, community members, and artists who showcase a range of creative and scholarly pursuits related to the study of sexuality, gender, and/or queer and trans identities. We invite proposals for our 2025 conference to be held in Asheville, NC, March 28 - 30th. We especially welcome presenters from historically marginalized populations, including but not limited to, LGBTQIA+, Black, Brown, Indigenous, disabled, poor, and/or immigrant communities. 

The 2025 conference theme is “Cultivating Resilience, Centering Joy.” While queer life can be marked by oppression, it can also be defined by the joy that endures through community. The work of resisting academic and political attacks on queer lives can become daunting, isolating, and draining, which makes it all the more important to turn inward and to our allies for sustenance and renewed energy. When the world feels turbulent and impossible, what is it that brings us hope and possibility? How do we sustain momentum in the face of apathy and counter-resistance? What can we do to prepare a new generation for thriving in the work that is not easy, but must be done?

Elaborations on the theme might include (but are not limited to):

What connections between mind and body will help us sustain ourselves and our work?

How do we learn to have difficult, transformative conversations that effectively challenge oppressive narratives and behaviors?

In what ways can art be a means of joy and resistance?

What mentorship possibilities can we develop for our queer and trans youth?

What can educators do to cultivate inclusive classrooms while operating under increasing surveillance, scrutiny, and censorship?

What tools can we add to our emotional toolboxes to withstand the onslaught of attacks on trans and queer lives?

Suggested presentation formats include (but are not limited to):

Paper Presentation (15 minutes; 1 or more presenters)

Present your work in person on UNCA’s campus

The organizers will place your work into a panel with 2-3 other presenters by topic

Asynchronous Paper Presentation (15 minutes)

Pre-record your presentation to be posted on the conference website 

Panel Presentation (90 minutes, 3-4 presenters)

Present in person on UNCA’s campus

Proposals must include information about each presenter and what each presenter will be contributing. Make sure to answer: Who is on the panel? What is each person presenting?

Workshop (60-90 minutes; 1 or more presenters)

Proposals must include information about each presenter and what each presenter will be contributing. Make sure to answer: Who is facilitating the workshop? What are the learning outcomes for attendees?

Performance / Exhibition

Your proposal must specify the length and format, what space/equipment you require, and whether/how your work can be delivered online

Option to present in person on UNCA’s campus or pre-record to be added to the conference website

Poster presentations

Print your poster (size 36x48in) to present in person and/or submit a digital copy for the conference website

Other presentation types are welcome - please email us your ideas!

Conference Dates: March 28-30, 2023 | Location: Asheville, NC

Submit proposals online:

Important Links

Submit proposals here: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfipMZ27nKAmbr3-7Nv5QNDP60yVp_dnALk3GhVYt79fkT5KQ/viewform?usp=sf_link  

Conference website: https://queercon.wp.unca.edu/  

Follow our Instagram and Facebook for updates and announcements.

Register for the conference on Eventbrite: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/queer-studies-conference-2023-registration-429340146937  

Dates and deadlines

Submission deadline: Friday, November 15, 2024

Notification of acceptance: January 5, 2025

Deadline to confirm your attendance: February 15, 2025

If you do not confirm by this date, your presentation will be removed from the program. 

Presenters are not considered confirmed until they have registered for the conference. 

Deadline to upload asynchronous presentations: March 15, 2025

Conference dates: March 28-30, 2025

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• Open access
• Published: 23 August 2024

Effects of health education applying role play on decision making in acute myocardial infarction situation among older adults in community

• Samoraphop Banharak 1 ,
• Ampornpan Threeranut 2 &
• Alin Metprommarat 3  

Scientific Reports volume  14 , Article number:  19627 ( 2024 ) Cite this article

Metrics details

• Medical research
• Signs and symptoms

Acute myocardial infarction is a silent killer for people worldwide, especially older adults who often experience atypical symptoms, causing late decision-making and a high mortality rate. The unrecognition of atypical symptoms, unconcerned about their risk, and not knowing how to deal with this critical situation are the barriers to a quick decision to visit the emergency department and delaying treatment, resulting in serious adverse outcomes. Therefore, specific and effective health education among older adults is needed. This double-blinded randomized controlled trial explored the effectiveness of health education by applying a role-play promoting decision-making ability program when expecting acute myocardial infarction occurrence among community-dwelling older adults. The participants were 96 community-dwelling older adults in central northeastern Thailand. We collected data between November 2021 and April 2022. The multi-stage sampling was applied to include participants. The intervention was the role-play promoting decision-making ability program and home visit. Outcomes were measured a week before attending and after finishing the intervention. T-tests, Mann–Whitney U test, Chi-square, and Wilcoxon Signed Rank test compared the outcomes between and within groups. Moreover, adjusted analysis was also demonstrated. Results revealed that participants who attended the program improved their knowledge, belief, and decision-making; only perceived susceptibility did not show improvement. Moreover, after demonstrating an adjusted analysis, the program participants had better knowledge about symptoms, perceived benefits, barriers, self-regulation, possible calling 1669, and first action. In conclusion, a role-play promoting decision-making ability program can promote knowledge, belief, and decision-making when expecting acute myocardial infarction occurrence among community-dwelling older adults. This study proved that role-play is one strategy to promote the program's effectiveness by inducing attention before giving older adults health information. Nurses and other healthcare professionals can implement this program as part of standard practice.

Clinical Trial Registration Number: TCTR20210928004 on 28/09/2021.

Similar content being viewed by others

Effectiveness of acute myocardial infarction interventions on selected outcomes among community dwelling-older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Perceived control attitude among heart failure patients in Oman: a multicenter study

Prevalence and predictors of poor self-care behaviors in patients with chronic heart failure, introduction.

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) occurs when the coronary arteries become acutely obstructed by fatty clots or coronary spasms 1 , 2 . This serious health problem is a silent killer worldwide, especially among older adults who often experience atypical symptoms 1 , 3 , 4 . It is found that over three million people worldwide suffer from acute myocardial infarction 5 . There were 805,000 AMI patients reported by the American Heart Association (AHA) in 2019 6 . Of these, 170,000 had an unusual presentation and asymptomatic/silent MI 3 . These atypical and silent symptoms may result in patients' lack of awareness and late decision-making to seek treatment. As for statistical studies in Thailand, it was found that in 2016, 2017, and 2018, 327,453, 326,946, and 337,441 people experienced AMI. Of these, 21,008, 20,746, and 20,786 resulted in death, respectively 7 , 8 . It also found that people experienced AMI every 40 s 3 , and in every 90 s, they died from AMI 9 . More than 63% of people with AMI die; of this, 45% die before arriving at hospitals and have no chance to receive treatment 10 . A study of the incidence of death in each age group found that 9 out of 10 deaths were older adults aged over 70 years 4 , indicating that AMI was the leading cause of death among older adults 11 , 12 .

Patients with delayed treatment, particularly older ones, tend to have more severe symptoms and a higher risk of death 1 , 10 , 13 . Researchers divided phases of delaying treatment into the patient recognition action, transportation, and hospital phases. Older adults spent the longest time in the patient recognition action phase due to the lack of knowledge and understanding about whether the existing symptom is a symptom of AMI 1 , 10 , 13 , 14 . In addition, non-specific symptoms (atypical symptoms) cause older adults to miss interpretation or interpret symptoms they are experiencing as symptoms of other illnesses or diseases. For example, they interpreted that they were suffering from acid reflux or Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) when experiencing heartburn or from peptic ulcer when experiencing abdominal distension or indigestion 13 . As a result, they respond to symptoms unrelated to or specific to myocardial infarction, such as taking antacids or applying massage therapy to relieve abdominal distension, wait-to-see, even praying for recovery from the symptoms. In addition, some older women also believe that acute myocardial infarction and heart disease are specific diseases or conditions for men. Thus, they interpreted their symptoms in a way related to a woman's disease or other ailments 13 .

Older people's knowledge and beliefs are essential influences on delayed treatment 1 , 13 . Inappropriate recognition and management of non-specific symptoms can delay decision-making for treatment, lead to severe complications, and result in sudden death. This situation highlights that a lack of knowledge and inappropriate beliefs about AMI in older adults significantly contribute to misinterpretation of symptoms, improper symptom management, delayed admission, and the negative consequences of postponed treatment, including death before reaching the hospital 1 , 13 . Based on a systematic review, factors contributing to delayed treatment among older adults with AMI can be divided into four groups: socio-demographic factors, environmental factors, psychological and behavioral factors, and clinical characteristics 13 , 15 , 16 , 17 . The primary factors causing delayed treatment were psychological and behavioral. Older adults are often more reluctant and confused about their symptoms and hesitate to bother family members when experiencing atypical or unclear symptoms, especially at inappropriate times such as night or early morning. This hesitation leads to prolonged decision-making before seeking treatment 1 , 16 , 17 , 18 . This phenomenon underscores that if older adults continue to lack knowledge, harbor misunderstandings, and maintain inappropriate beliefs about AMI and its symptoms, delays in receiving treatment will likely persist.

The aging process, multi-pathology, and level of education significantly impact older adults' decision-making abilities. As people age, they often experience sensory and cognitive dysfunctions due to decreased blood supply to the hippocampus and frontal lobe, leading to memory deficits, slower interpretation and analysis of situations, and delayed recall 19 . They also have their own beliefs based on their experience that might be inappropriate 16 . Additionally, older adults frequently suffer from multiple pathologies, such as diabetes mellitus and hypertension, which can distort vascular and nervous systems. Consequently, their chronic diseases cause atypical symptoms of AMI, like shortness of breath, fainting, abdominal or chest discomfort, and sudden confusion when having AMI 13 , 17 . These factors cause older adults to take longer to learn, remember, differentiate, and interpret existing symptoms, resulting in delayed decision-making and seeking treatment compared to younger adults 17 . Furthermore, if they have a combination of aging, multi-pathology, and low education levels, it creates significant barriers to recognizing atypical symptoms and deciding to go to the hospital late 13 , 17 , 18 . This delay prevents them from receiving timely and essential cardiac treatments, leading to severe complications and death 1 , 13 , 20 . The most effective treatment for AMI patients must be administered within the "golden period" of two hours, but older adults often take more than six hours to decide on admission or seek treatment 1 , 6 . Therefore, appropriate and specific ways of educating older adults that concerning their aging process and promoting appropriate beliefs and decision-making are crucial to addressing this problem and improving their outcomes.

Role-play is an innovative method to draw attention and promote appropriate and quick responses/decisions that can be used as an intervention or a part of an intervention 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 . It is changing one’s behavior to assume a role by unconsciously filling a social role and consciously acting out an adopted role; both can be with a group or individuality 23 , 24 . According to Bruce et al., role-playing is crucial for a child's psychological development 24 . According to certain studies, role-playing can lead to behavioral changes. For example, smokers who were instructed to pretend to have lung cancer reported feeling negative about smoking and quit it 25 . Role-playing was also used to promote decision-making for prostate cancer screening among Black male patients and their providers 21 , and empathy promoted interventions for health professionals 22 . The systematic review and meta-analysis found no researcher applied role-play to promote quick and immediate decision-making, such as AMI situation 26 . However, Jasemi et al. reported that role-playing helps nursing students operate ethically and with greater sensitivity 27 , Makarov et al. reported that role-playing has been utilized in interventions to enhance shared decision-making skills among patients and healthcare providers 21 , and Kiosses et al. confirmed that programs applying role-playing have been shown to improve not only the knowledge and skills of participants but also their empathic behavior, which is crucial for effective patient care 22 . Furthermore, role-play and scenarios efficiently foster older persons' emergency response, awareness, and readiness in emergencies like disasters 28 .

It is not only role-playing, but the Health Belief Model (HBM) is also an essential part of the program structure to promote decision-making. This conceptual model links belief components in health decision-making, emphasizing measuring beliefs and decision-making at the individual level. The HBM is widely used to explain why people practice health behaviors or do not follow the advice on protecting their health 29 , 30 . This model was developed to describe a person's decisions regarding health behaviors. The structure of the health belief model has four main components and two subcomponents: perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits of treatment and prevention, perceived barriers, self-efficacy, and cues to action 30 , 31 . In cases of AMI, if older adults know about the AMI symptoms and risk factors and have an appropriate belief through attending the attractive role-playing and health education concerning older adult limitations, this will encourage them to realize the importance and make decisions to seek treatment quickly. Decision-making behavior is individuals' actions and processes when making choices. However, decision-making ability is the cognitive capacity and skills that enable individuals to make decisions 32 , 33 . It involves understanding information, weighing options, considering potential outcomes, and making a choice. In the context of AMI, decision-making ability is critical for patients and healthcare providers to make timely and effective decisions 32 , 33 . This ability is improved by health education interventions by improving knowledge, behavioral interventions by improving self-efficacy, and technological interventions by using applications or decision-support systems. Good decision-making ability can promote appropriate decision-making behavior in AMI situations 32 , 33 , 34 . This study aimed to explore the effectiveness of a health education program applying role-play in promoting decision-making ability to encourage older adults to make appropriate and timely decisions in situations of AMI.

The aim of this study was to study the effectiveness of a role-play promoting decision-making ability program when expecting acute myocardial infarction occurrence on knowledge, belief, and decision making among community dwelling older adults.

Designs/methodologies

Research design, sample and setting.

The study used a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial with a two-group pretest–posttest design; the older adults and outcome evaluators (research assistants) were blinded. The population of interest was community-dwelling older adults living in a semi-urban community in central, northeastern Thailand. We applied multi-stage sampling for this study, starting with cluster sampling, followed by simple random sampling. The cluster sampling was used to select two similar semi-urban communities from 18 communities. The two communities are about 12 km from downtown and super tertiary hospitals, providing call centers, ambulances, emergency services, and advanced cardiac procedures. These two semi-urban communities also had primary care units, and people living there had similar lifestyles and occupations. After study settings randomization was done, a simple random sampling was used to include older adults in each group; this was done by drawing lots (house numbers) from all meeting inclusion criteria from the two communities. The sample size was determined using the equation for experimental research that compares means between two independent groups 35 and based exclusively on a previous study by Sanprakhon, Choosri, and Wongviseskul 30 . With an alpha level of 0.05, a power of 0.95, a variance of 3.12, and a mean difference of 2.23, a power analysis determined that 43 participants would be necessary for each group. However, the 10% possible dropout rate was added for sample size calculation, and 48 older adults for each group would be enough, meaning 96 community-dwelling older adults participated in this study.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Eligibility to participate in the study was based on seven criteria: (1) male or female between the ages of 60 and 80 years old; (2) capable of reading and writing Thai; (3) oriented to time and place; (4) no hearing and visual problem; (5) no depression symptom as screening with a 2-question (2Q) depression screening form (Respond “No” for both questions), or dementia as screening with the Thai Mental State Examination (score ≥ 23 points); (6) no disturbing signs/symptoms, such as knee osteoarthritis, severe pain (10-point numerical scale ≥ 5 points) or high fever (axillary temperature ≥ 38.5 °C) to join program activities such as role-play and Emergency Call (1669) situation; and (7) willing to participate in this study by completing consent form. In cases of family members or caregivers of older adults who are required to participate in primary cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), they must not have any health problems or symptoms that limit the practice of CPR, such as heart disease, chest pain, asthma, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), arthritis, severe pain (PS ≥ 5 points), high fever (BT ≥ 38.5 degrees), or abnormal vital signs.

Exclusion criteria were (1) older adults with an acute illness after starting the activity, such as low blood pressure, difficulty breathing, chest pain, and dizziness, and (2) Older adults participating in less than 6 out of 8 activities.

Data collection

The total number of older adults in the two communities was 674; however, 142 did not meet the inclusion criteria, and 31 declined to participate. Only 501 were randomly included in this study using simple random sampling (drawing lots of house numbers). Finally, the 96 participants were randomly included in the control or experimental groups. These two groups lived in different sites and were about 12 km away from downtown, and they did not know they were in control or experimental groups. Moreover, the two research assistants were allowed to participate in this study only for outcomes evaluation, and they did not know they were measuring outcomes for participants in control or experiential groups. The two research assistants not working in these two communities assessed their knowledge, beliefs, and decision-making a week before starting this study. They re-evaluated these outcomes a week after finishing the intervention. The experimental group received a health education applying role-play promoting decision-making ability program and home visits for eight weeks to improve their knowledge, belief, and decision-making, and the control group received routine care, home visits, and brochures during the same period. The study lasted from November 2021 to April 2022.

Research instruments

Screening: The depression symptom was screened using a 2-question (2Q) depression screening form with a sensitivity of 97.3 and a specificity of 45.6 36 . Cognitive function was screened using the Thai Mental State Examination (TMMSE) with a sensitivity of 82 and a specificity of 70 37 . The TMMSE also achieved Cronbach’s alphas as 0.81 38 .

Demographic and clinical information: This included sex, age, marital status, education level, income, occupation, health insurance, health status, chronic diseases, self-experience of AMI, and seeing or knowing other persons experiencing AMI.

Primary outcomes: Knowledge was measured by the 12-item knowledge of coronary artery disease (CAD) risk factors and the 15-item knowledge of AMI symptoms. These two questionnaires had three response items, including “ yes”, “no,” and “ not sure.” If older adults checked “yes” for the correct answer, they got one score, but if they checked “no” for the correct answer, they got zero. Older adults who checked “not sure” got zero for every question. The total scores were 12 and 15, respectively, and the test–retest reliability for these two questionnaires was 0.78 and 0.90, respectively 13 .

The belief was measured by six questionnaires, including the four items of perceived susceptibility, 15 items of perceived severity, four items of perceived benefit, 15 items of perceived barrier, four items of perceived self-regulation, and four items of perceived cue to action. There were six response items for perceived susceptibility and cue to action from 1 (not at all) to 6 (very likely), and six response items for the other four questionnaires for 1 (strongly disagree)–6 (strongly agree). Total scores for each questionnaire were 24, 90, 24, 90, 24, and 24, and Cronbach’s Alpha Coefficients were 0.90, 0.95, 0.92, 0.90, 0.90, and 0.84, respectively 13 , 39 .

The two questions measured decision-making; one asked how likely the older adults were to take seven of any actions (such as calling emergency service/1669, taking medicine, drinking water, and smelling cologne/herb) if they were in the presence of someone having an AMI. This question had seven response items from 1 (not at all) to 7 (certain). We picked only one action, calling 1669, for our analysis, and the other six actions just be provided to not guide the best action for older adults for the next question. The second question asked older adults to choose the best first plan-of-act when they were in the presence of someone having an AMI. This question had seven choices, including seven of the above actions. If older adults checked on calling 1669, one was entered; if they checked on other actions, zero was entered for data analysis. Cronbach's Alpha Coefficient for this questionnaire was 0.95 39 . When analyzing data, we prepared the first question as a continuing variable and the second as a dichotomous one.

Intervention

Based on a systematic review, the researchers developed a health education applying role-play promoting decision-making ability program for community-dwelling older adults 28 . The structure of this program was a health belief model, the details were based on systematic review results, and the content was updated with the content suggested by the American Heart Association. The program content included heart disease and AMI, etiology, signs and symptoms, treatment and management, emergency service and call, appropriate action in AMI situations, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training, appropriate decision-making activities, asking for help, and program review. Moreover, role-playing related to each activity was used to draw attention from the older adults before starting the program.

This program was proved by five experts, including two cardiologists, two cardiac nurses, and one researcher who was an expert in gerontological nursing. The program's activities and materials relied on the principle of providing health education concerning aging processes and impairment 40 , 41 , 42 . We spend a short period and divide health education programs into a few short sections. Teaching strategies included both class teaching (lecture) and practicing. The tasks for practicing were uncomplicated, including a few steps, and they were done step by step. Health educators provided a good environment and appropriate places for teaching and training. The teaching style considered the context and culture of older adults. Suitable media were applied to communicate health information to this target group, as well as large letters and visible pictures to read and see.

Moreover, uncomplicated sentences, informal language, and friendly colors were provided. Finally, a handbook was provided for older adults to take back home to review. This program included eight-week activities, which each week started with a greeting and introduction (5 min), role-playing about the situation related to weekly activities (10 min), giving health education/training health activities (15–30 min), and conclusion (5 min). There were between 45 and 60 min in total for each session. Finally, the handbook was prepared using large letters, black letters on a yellow background, simple and informal sentences, clear pictures, and brief content/short text. Before conducting this research, this program was piloted with ten older adults to ensure its feasibility and acceptability. This program was able to draw attention from and suitable for older adults; however, two unclear pictures were suggested to be changed, and the size of the letters was suggested to make it bigger from 18 to 20. Then, it was revised based on the limitations and suggestions of older adults. The final eight-week activities with all details are shown in the figure (Fig.  1 ).

Health education applying role-play promoting decision-making ability program.

In the control group, the participants received brochures and home visits by the registered nurses in their community setting. The participants had chances to ask questions and discuss when measuring vital signs during home visits. This home visit was once a week with or without the participant's family members.

Validity and reliability

The study protocol was developed and prospectively registered to avoid bias, and this study was conducted strictly following the registered protocol. A checklist for all activities was provided and completed to confirm that the primary investigator did all activities and procedures following the protocol. To avoid bias, a randomized was performed two times, including cluster sampling and simple random sampling, and a double-blinded design was applied (research assistants and participants did not know which groups were control or intervention groups). The four actors who performed role-play earned a bachelor's degree in nursing. They were trained and performed acting rehearsals many times until they achieved this program's main points of health information and aims before performing role-play to older adults. Moreover, the two research assistants participated in the recruitment and data collection processes (baseline and post-intervention). However, the principal researcher only implemented intervention using a flipchart and PowerPoint. The two research assistants earned master's degrees in nursing, had research experience, and were trained for screening and data collecting before starting this study. All questionnaires were checked twice and completed before the older adults left the school. The screening process and findings were reported using the diagram and standard statement.

Ethical considerations

The research received approval from the Khon Kaen University Center for Ethics in Human Research (Approval Number: HE642163) on July 15, 2021, following the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Volunteers who participated in the study received information about the purpose of the research, confidentiality of data, reporting data in the aggregate, and the ability to withdraw from the study without losing care or medical treatment—those who agreed to participate signed informed consent. Finally, the study protocol was prospectively registered on 28/09/2021, and the clinical trial registration number was TCTR20210928004.

Data analysis

Data were analyzed initially by calculating descriptive statistics using the IBM® SPSS® version 28 statistical software under a university license. Demographic characteristics between control and experimental groups were compared by applying the Chi-square Test, Fisher Exact Test, and Independent t-test. Normal distribution was explored using Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Shapiro–Wilk, Skewness and Kurtosis, Histogram, and normal Q–Q and Box plots before exploring between-groups and within-group comparisons. In normal distributions, independent-sample t -tests were examined for knowledge, belief, and decision-making differences between the experimental and control groups. However, the Mann–Whitney U test was applied for non-normal distribution variables.

In the same way, in cases of normal distribution, paired-sample t-tests compared within-group differences; however, the Wilcoxon (Matched Paired) Signed Rank test was applied for non-normal distribution variables. A Chi-square was generated when comparing a categorical variable, first of action. Finally, the adjusted analysis was performed to explore actual results after we found that sex, income, and knowledge of risk factors differed between control and experimental groups at the baseline.

Participants enrolment and withdrawal

Of the 674 community-dwelling older adults who were screened for eligibility, 173 older adults were excluded. The reasons for exclusion were not meeting the criteria for 142 older adults and declined to participate in this study for 30 older adults (Fig.  2 ). The 501 older adults from each community were randomized into control and experimental groups by drawing their house numbers. All 96 participants (48 participants per group) remained in this study. More females were in the experimental and control groups (Table 1 ), and the proportion of sex was significantly different between the two groups. The average age was 70.56 years ( SD  = 5.99). About half of the participants were widows, and over 80% attended formal education for only four years. Most had yearly incomes between 5001 and 10,000 Thai baht (about $150–$300 in US dollars; most received support from the Thai government about 600–800 Thai baht ($15–$20) a month), and this level of income was significantly different between the intervention and control groups. Most had no occupation or were farmers and used the universal coverage scheme as their health insurance. More than half defined their health status as neutral or good. Almost 70% reported that they had chronic diseases, including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, and chronic kidney disease. Only two older adults had direct experience with AMI, and only four older adults took part in the situations of someone having AMI.

CONSORT 2010 flow diagram.

Primary outcomes

At baseline (pretest), there were no statistical differences between groups in knowledge, belief, and decision-making, except in knowledge of risk factors, for which the scores in the control group were slightly higher than in the experimental group. After completing the decision-making ability promoting program, the participants in the experimental group had statistically better knowledge, belief, and decision-making, including knowledge of AMI symptoms, perceived benefit, barrier, self-regulation, possible calling 1669, and appropriate first of action than those in the control group (Table 2 ).

Although participants in the experimental group scored better in knowledge, belief, and decision-making than the control group, these outcomes improved within each group over the eight weeks. Within the control group, perceived susceptibility, barrier, and cue to action scores improved from baseline (pretest) to post-test. In the same way, knowledge of risk factors and AMI symptoms, perceived susceptibility, severity, benefit, self-regulation, cue to action, possible calling 1669, and first of act of older adults in the experimental group improved from baseline (pretest) to post-test (Table 3 ).

Finally, after an adjusted analysis was generated (adjusted by sex, income, and baseline knowledge of risk factors), the participants in the experimental group still had statistically better knowledge, belief, and decision-making, including knowledge of AMI symptoms, perceived benefits, barrier, self-regulation, possible calling 1669, and appropriate first of action, than those in the control group (Table 4 ).

Harms or adverse events

This study found no harm, adverse event or unintended effect happening to the participants in ether groups.

Community-dwelling older adults improved almost all selected outcomes after attending the decision-making ability promoting the program, except for the perceived barrier. These results demonstrated that this program could be used to improve knowledge, belief, and decision-making among community-dwelling older adults. A comprehensive development of the program based on the principle of giving health education concerning aging processes and impairment 40 , 41 is an essential part of this program to promote achievement on improving knowledge, belief, and decision making among community-dwelling older adults for this study. This program was applied not only in a short period, sub-sections, class teaching (lecture) and uncomplicated practicing (few steps, and go step by step), a good environment and appropriate place, integrated context, culture, and lifestyle of learners, but also applied the proper media, large letters, and visible picture to read and see. Moreover, a handbook with uncomplicated sentences, formal language, and friendly colors was also provided so that they could be taken back home to review 40 , 41 , 42 . Tianmongkol pointed out that the Thai Chara front (TH-Chara) size 16–18 is straightforward and easy to read by older adults; this was applied to our handbook 42 . Finally, Sungvorawongphana et al. also proved that pictures and colors of health information materials were significant parts of giving health education to older adults 43 . Letter color and clear, visible pictures to read and see can catch older adults’ attractiveness and promote their understanding. The program materials for this study were a flipchart, PowerPoint, and handbook, which applied huge and clear pictures and used black letters on yellow backgrounds. These three concepts effectively promoted readability and understanding for our target population 43 .

The provided health information is important, but the way to induce older adults' attention and make them ready for the provided health information and activities is also essential. This program always started with role-play, followed by class teaching (Flipchart lecture) or practice (CPR training and calling 1669) and a handbook review. The reason for applying and starting the program with role-play is to make the program attractive, induce older adults' attention, and improve knowledge, belief, and decision-making by giving specific health information related to AMI. Jasemi et al. found that role-play and lectures were more effective in promoting ethical sensitivity and ethical performance among nursing students than those who did not 27 . Moreover, role-play is more effective than the lecture method 27 . This innovative method was used to promote knowledge, belief, decision-making, and skills among healthcare professionals, nurse students, Black, White, and Asian people in the context of quitting smoking, ethic consideration, Empathy, cancer prevention, psychological development, BPH, and disaster 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 . Role-play was proved not only by children and adult groups (nursing students, healthcare professionals, healthy and ill patients) in ethical sensitivity and healthcare prevention issues but also among older adults in emergencies 28 . Seo et al. reported that role-play and scenarios effectively promote emergency response, awareness, and readiness among older adults in emergencies like disasters 28 . With innovative methods, such as role-play, this program reflects a good combination of health information, material, and methods to achieve the best outcomes for this study.

Older adults in the experimental group and older adults in the control group improved their outcomes. We found that perceived susceptibility, perceived benefit, and perceived cue of action among older adults in the control group after finishing this study were higher than baseline. This result is possible because a home visit can reach their awareness and perception. However, knowledge cannot be improved without giving health education. Other studies also found that providing a home visit with giving advice can reach patients’ knowledge, awareness, attention, self-care, self-efficacy, and adopted health behaviors among older adults and other age groups for several health issues such as medication adherence, asthma, blood pressure control, blood sugar level, and heart failure 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 . However, only a home visit cannot be used to promote all components and provide the most effective outcomes compared to multiple interventions or activities 49 . Moreover, the systematic review and meta-analysis found that the innovative methods, including multiple interventions such as a heart attack survival kit, red cardboard containing essential information, a list of warning signs of AMI, a group discussion, a home visit by the firefighter, strong recommendation to call 911 (calling an ambulance in USA), and primary step for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) were the most effective method promoting of calling 911 and taking aspirin 26 . Results from the systematic review and meta-analysis can be used to reflect why interventions in our experimental group promoted knowledge, belief, and decision-making more effectively.

The adjustment analysis confirmed that the decision-making ability-promoting program was more effective than the control group. We have found that older adults in the experimental group have higher scores in the knowledge of AMI symptoms, perceived benefit, perceived barrier, perceived self-regulation, possible calling 1669, and appropriate first-of-act planning when experiencing AMI. It was confirmed that multi-method or multifactorial intervention programs are superior to single interventions 49 . However, this program could improve decision-making ability, which might slightly affect or cannot be used to confirm the time to seek treatment and delay the time to receive treatment. This issue is still an area of interest and should be further explored in real situations and long-term studies. Finally, this study found that older adults in the experimental group reported higher scores of perceived barriers than in the control group. This unexpected finding might be because some questions under this component ask about quitting the job, income, and treatment and service costs, and older adults in the experimental group have slightly less income when compared with the control group.

Another point is that the cue to act, which is defined as something to induce awareness or induce people to decide to do something or practice health behaviors 30 , 31 , in the experimental group was improved after attending the program. However, this outcome was similar when compared with the control group. Family members and caregivers greatly support older adults in making decisions and performing health behaviors 50 , 51 , 52 . Although this intervention encouraged family members and caregivers to participate in the program, only 1–2 times joining activities might not be enough for older adults to feel support from their surrounding people and commit action in an AMI situation. This unexpected finding suggests that the family members or caregivers should engage in the program often (almost every time) for future study.

Limitations and recommendations

Although we have tried to develop program activities and materials relying on the principle of giving health education concerning aging processes and sensory impairment, this study was conducted under the COVID-19 pandemic situation and social distancing policy, social distancing seat arrangement, and mask on all the time. Conducting research under this policy may be a barrier when role-playing and providing health education. It may be a reason why older adults only achieve some of the outcomes we have expected and measured. For future studies, this program should be conducted again if the pandemic situation improves (normal situation); if not, the mobile application would be appropriate. Most participants for this study were female; this variable should be a concern when applying this result to future studies and practice. Long-term evaluations should be carried out to determine the persistence of knowledge, belief, and decision-making ability since this study evaluated these outcomes a week after finishing interventions. This study was conducted among older adults for the situation when expecting AMI occurrence; future studies should explore the effectiveness of this program in the actual situation of AMI or study among hospitalized older adults who already experienced AMI after they were discharged.

This study showed that a health education applying role play promoting decision-making ability program could improve knowledge, belief, and decision-making among community-dwelling older adults. Registered nurses or other health care professionals should explore alternative methods to improve these essential outcomes for this target population since they are prone to experience atypical symptoms of AMI and delay treatment. Nurses and healthcare professionals can implement this program as part of standard practice or adjust it to fit the lifestyles and needs of community-dwelling older adults. Role-play might be one strategy to promote the program's effectiveness by inducing attention before giving older adults health information, and this could improve knowledge and belief and promote quick decision-making for this target group of people when experiencing acute myocardial infarction.

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to prohibited laws (and/or rules, regulations, and contracts). However, they are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

American Heart Association. (2023). 2023 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics Update Fact Sheet. 2023 Statistics Update—At-a-Glance Statistics. Retrieved April 4, 2023. https://professional.heart.org/en/science-news/-/media/453448D7D79948B39D5851D1FF2A0CFE.ashx

American Heart Association. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2022 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 145 , e153–e639. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001052 (2022).

Article   Google Scholar  

Virani, S. S. et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2020 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 141 (9), e139-596 (2020).

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

World Heart Federation. (2017). CVD is the world’s biggest killer. Retrieved October 28, 2018. https://www.world-heart-federation.org/

Sweis, R.N., & Jivan, A. (2022). Acute myocardial infarction. Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine. Retrieved April 8, 2023. https://www.msdmanuals.com/professional/cardiovascular-disorders/coronary-artery-disease/acute-myocardial-infarction-mi#top .

American Heart Association. Heart disease and stroke statistics 2019 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 139 , e56–e528. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000659 (2019).

Division of non-communicable diseases. (2020a). Number and rate of inpatients with ischemic heart disease (I20-I25) per 100,000 population (including all diagnoses) 2007–2015 classified by province, public health service area and country overview (including Bangkok). Retrieved July 12, 2020. http://www.thaincd.com/2016/mission3 .

Division of non-communicable diseases. (2020b). Number and mortality rate of 4 NCD diseases per 100,000 population, 2016–2018 classified by province, public health service area and country overview (including Bangkok). Retrieved July 12, 2020. http://www.thaincd.com/2016/mission3 .

Benjamin, E. J. et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2018 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 137 , e67–e492. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000558 (2018).

Kanbuala, W., Samartkit, N. & Keeratiyutawong, P. Factors related to decision time for seeking treatment in patients with myocardial infarction. Nursing J. Ministry Public Health 24 (2), 21–36 (2014).

Google Scholar  

World Health Organization. (2018). Cardiovascular disease. Retrieved October 28, 2018. https://www.who.int/cardiovascular_diseases/en/

World Health Organization. (2023). Aging and health. Retrieved April 4, 2023. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health

Banharak, S. (2017). Knowledge belief and decision making about acute myocardial infarction among younger and older adult Thai and Laotian immigrants in the United States. Doctoral Dissertation, School of Nursing, Saint Louis University, USA.

Banharak, S. & Prasankok, C. The effects of delaying treatment among acute myocardial infarction patients: A systematic review. J. Nursing Sci. Health 40 (4), 107–120 (2018).

Kasetkala, P., Watthnakitkrileart, D., Charoenkitkarn, V., Sriprasong, S. & Dumavibhat, C. Factors influencing the duration of decision making for seeking treatment in patients with acute heart failure. J. Nursing Sci. 31 (4), 23–33 (2013).

Banharak, S., Zahrli, T. & Matsuo, H. Public knowledge about risk factors, symptoms, and first decision-making in response to symptoms of heart attack among lay people. Pacif. Rim Int. J. Nursing 22 (1), 24–36 (2018).

Banharak, S., Prasankok, C. & Lach, H. Factors related to a delay in seeking treatment for acute myocardial infarction in older adults: An integrative review. Pacif. Rim Int. J. Nursing Res. 24 (4), 553–568 (2020).

Sungbun, S., Piaseu, N. & Partiprajak, S. Needs of stakeholders in fast-track care for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Thai J. Nursing Council 32 (4), 19–38 (2017).

Leto, L. & Feola, M. Cognitive impairment in heart failure patients. J. Geriatr. Cardiol. 11 (4), 316–328 (2014).

CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Suwanno, J., Petsirasan, R., Suwanno, J., Saisuk, W. & Chanpradit, A. Age and heart failure self-care: A comparison of self-care maintenance between older and younger adults. Songklanagarind Med. J. 27 (4), 335–346 (2009).

Makarov, D. V. et al. Randomized trial of community health worker-led decision coaching to promote shared decision-making for prostate cancer screening among Black male patients and their providers. Trials 22 , 128. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05064-4 (2021).

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Kiosses, V. N., Karathanos, V. T. & Tatsioni, A. Empathy promoting interventions for health professionals: A systematic review of RCTs. J. Compassionate Health Care 3 , 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40639-016-0024-9 (2016).

Corsini, R. (2017). Role Playing in Psychotherapy . New Brunswick, NJ: AldineTransaction. p. 21. ISBN 9780202363936.

Bruce, T., Hakkarainen, P. & Bredikyte, M. The Routledge International Handbook of Early Childhood Play 55 (Routledge, 2017).

Book   Google Scholar  

Maio, G. & Haddock, G. The Psychology of Attitudes and Attitude Change 157 (SAGE, 2014).

Banharak, S., Metprommarat, A., Mahikul, W., Jeamjitvibool, T. & Karaket, A. Effectiveness of acute myocardial infarction interventions on selected outcomes among community dwelling-older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 13 , 18538. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45695-y (2023).

Article   ADS   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Jasemi, M., Goli, R., Zabihi, R. E. & Khalkhali, H. Educating ethics codes by lecture or role-play; which one improves nursing students’ ethical sensitivity and ethical performance more? A quasi-experimental study. J. Professional Nursing 40 , 122–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.11.002 (2022).

Seo, H. J., Son, M. & Hong, A. J. Trends in civic engagement disaster safety education research: Systematic literature review and keyword network analysis. Sustainability 13 (5), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052505 (2021).

Jaihow, S., Klayvised, J., Sangprajong, K. & Petsirasan, R. Health belief and breast self-examination behavior among females student at a university in Nakhon Si Thammarat. J. Police Nurses 10 (1), 154–163 (2018).

Sanprakhon, P., Chusri, O. & Wongwisadkul, S. The effects of health belief application program in older adults with risk of coronary artery disease in a community. Nursing J. Ministry Public Health 28 (3), 87–100 (2018).

Duangkaew, T. & Sirasoonthorn, P. An application of Marshall H. Becker’s Health Belief Model [HBM] in the study of hypertension patients in urban communities in Phitsanulok. J. Community Develop. Res. (Human. Social Sci.) 10 (3), 101–113 (2017).

Dracup, K. et al. The effect of a short-term educational intervention on knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs related to response to acute myocardial infarction. Heart Lung 37 (4), 269–281 (2008).

Whitehead, D. L., Takahashi, R., Ritchie, D. & Dainty, K. N. Interventions to improve patient decision making in acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review. Eur. J. Cardiovasc. Nursing 15 (6), 447–458 (2016).

Tschandl, P. et al. Human–computer collaboration for skin cancer recognition. Nat. Med. 26 (8), 1229–1234 (2020).

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Chanabun, S. Fundamental Research Methodology in Health Science (Faculty of Nursing, Khon Kaen University, 2021).

Soonthornchaiya, R. et al. The development and construct validity testing of depressive symptom inventory for Thai older persons with depressive disorders. J. Phychiatric Nursing Mental Health 32 (2), 100–112 (2018).

Kanjananopinit, S., Charoensak, S. & Keawpornsawan, T. The study of psychometric properties of cognistat Thai version. J. Psychiatr. Assoc. Thailand. 59 (4), 409–418 (2014).

Undara, W., Singhasenee, U. & Wongnitikul, P. The study of dementia, knowledge and prevention of dementia and the demographic data in the elderly association of royal Thai air force nursing college. J. Police Nurse 8 (1), 23–33 (2016).

Kotsin, R., Banharak, S., Panpanit, L. & Chanaboon, S. A survey of knowledge, belief, decision making when expecting acute myocardial infarction occurrence among community-dwelling older adults in ROI-ET province. J. Health Nursing Res. 36 (6), 1–18 (2020).

Kececi, A., & Bulduk, S. (2012). Health Education for the Elderly, Geriatrics, InTech. Retrieved June 16, 2022. http://www.intechopen.com/books/geriatrics/health

Kim, M. Y. & Oh, S. Nurses’ perspectives on health education and health literacy of older patients. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17 , 6455. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186455 (2020).

Thienmongkol, R. The study of fonts legibility for elders: A contextual of Thai alphabets on tablet screen. Veridian E-J. Silpakorn Univ. 10 (3), 1066–1082 (2017).

Sungvorawongphana, N., Subgranon, R., Pungrassamee, P., Sumngern, C. & Obama, T. The color vision of elderly under difference illuminance. J. Faculty Nursing Burapha Univ. 23 (1), 13–25 (2016).

Apter, A. J. et al. Home visits for uncontrolled asthma among low-income adults with patient portal access. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 144 (3), 846-853.e11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2019.05.030 (2019).

Bumrungsuk, S. Effects of the self-management training program on self-management behavior and blood pressure levels among elderly people with hypertension. Front. Nursing 9 (1), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.2478/fon-2022-0009 (2022).

Kartika, A. W., Widyatuti, W. & Rekawati, E. The effectiveness of home-based nursing intervention in the elderly with recurrent diabetic foot ulcers: A case report. J. Public Health Res. 10 (2), 2162. https://doi.org/10.4081/jphr.2021.2162 (2021).

Liang, Y. H. et al. Reducing medication problems among minority individuals with low socioeconomic status through pharmacist home visits. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19 (7), 4234. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19074234 (2022).

Van Spall, H. G. C. et al. Knowledge to action: Rationale and design of the Patient-Centered Care Transitions in Heart Failure (PACT-HF) stepped wedge cluster randomized trial. Am. Heart J. 199 , 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2017.12.013 (2018).

Saraboon, Y., Aree-Ue, S. & Maruo, S. J. The effect of multifactorial intervention programs on health behavior and symptom control among community-dwelling overweight older adults with knee osteoarthritis. Orthop. Nursing 34 (5), 296–308. https://doi.org/10.1097/NOR.0000000000000180 (2015).

Glomsås, H. S., Knutsen, I. R., Fossum, M., Christiansen, K. & Halvorsen, K. Family caregivers’ involvement in caring for frail older family members using welfare technology: A qualitative study of home care in transition. BMC Geriatr. 22 (1), 223. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-02890-2 (2022).

Liu, H., Yang, R. & Feng, Z. Age-related loss of resources and perceived old age in China. Ageing Society 42 (6), 1280–1298. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X20001440 (2022).

Syse, A., Artamonova, A., Thomas, M. & Veenstra, M. Do characteristics of family members influence older persons’ transition to long-term healthcare services?. BMC Health Services Res. 22 (1), 362. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07745-5 (2022).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank those who contributed to developing the health education applying role-play promoting decision-making ability program. A special thanks is extended to the community-dwelling older adults who participated in the study. Lastly, we would like to acknowledge the registered nurses at primary care units and staff at older adult schools for their cooperation and participation during the research process.

This research project was financially supported by the young researcher development project of Khon Kaen University (Grant number YRDP-KKU-0212182020). Appreciation is extended to this research project for making this research possible.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Gerontological Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand

Samoraphop Banharak

Department of Adult Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand

Ampornpan Threeranut

Queen Sirikrit Heart Center of the Northeast, Khon Kaen, Thailand

Alin Metprommarat

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors have agreed on the final version and meet at least one of the following criteria (recommended by the ICMJE: http://www.icmje.org/recommendation/ ): 1. Substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; Drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samoraphop Banharak .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Banharak, S., Threeranut, A. & Metprommarat, A. Effects of health education applying role play on decision making in acute myocardial infarction situation among older adults in community. Sci Rep 14 , 19627 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-70747-2

Download citation

Received : 20 April 2024

Accepted : 20 August 2024

Published : 23 August 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-70747-2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Acute myocardial infarction
• Community-dwelling
• Decision making
• Health belief model
• Heart attack
• Randomized controlled trial
• Role playing

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines . If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Frequently asked questions

What should i include in a research paper introduction.

The introduction of a research paper includes several key elements:

• A hook to catch the reader’s interest
• Relevant background on the topic
• Details of your research problem

and your problem statement

• A thesis statement or research question
• Sometimes an overview of the paper

Frequently asked questions: Writing a research paper

A research project is an academic, scientific, or professional undertaking to answer a research question . Research projects can take many forms, such as qualitative or quantitative , descriptive , longitudinal , experimental , or correlational . What kind of research approach you choose will depend on your topic.

The best way to remember the difference between a research plan and a research proposal is that they have fundamentally different audiences. A research plan helps you, the researcher, organize your thoughts. On the other hand, a dissertation proposal or research proposal aims to convince others (e.g., a supervisor, a funding body, or a dissertation committee) that your research topic is relevant and worthy of being conducted.

Formulating a main research question can be a difficult task. Overall, your question should contribute to solving the problem that you have defined in your problem statement .

However, it should also fulfill criteria in three main areas:

• Researchability
• Feasibility and specificity
• Relevance and originality

Research questions anchor your whole project, so it’s important to spend some time refining them.

In general, they should be:

• Focused and researchable
• Answerable using credible sources
• Complex and arguable
• Feasible and specific
• Relevant and original

All research questions should be:

• Focused on a single problem or issue
• Researchable using primary and/or secondary sources
• Feasible to answer within the timeframe and practical constraints
• Specific enough to answer thoroughly
• Complex enough to develop the answer over the space of a paper or thesis
• Relevant to your field of study and/or society more broadly

A research aim is a broad statement indicating the general purpose of your research project. It should appear in your introduction at the end of your problem statement , before your research objectives.

Research objectives are more specific than your research aim. They indicate the specific ways you’ll address the overarching aim.

Once you’ve decided on your research objectives , you need to explain them in your paper, at the end of your problem statement .

Keep your research objectives clear and concise, and use appropriate verbs to accurately convey the work that you will carry out for each one.

I will compare …

Your research objectives indicate how you’ll try to address your research problem and should be specific:

Research objectives describe what you intend your research project to accomplish.

They summarize the approach and purpose of the project and help to focus your research.

Your objectives should appear in the introduction of your research paper , at the end of your problem statement .

The main guidelines for formatting a paper in Chicago style are to:

• Use a standard font like 12 pt Times New Roman
• Use 1 inch margins or larger
• Apply double line spacing
• Indent every new paragraph ½ inch
• Include a title page
• Place page numbers in the top right or bottom center
• Cite your sources with author-date citations or Chicago footnotes
• Include a bibliography or reference list

To automatically generate accurate Chicago references, you can use Scribbr’s free Chicago reference generator .

The main guidelines for formatting a paper in MLA style are as follows:

• Use an easily readable font like 12 pt Times New Roman
• Set 1 inch page margins
• Include a four-line MLA heading on the first page
• Center the paper’s title
• Use title case capitalization for headings
• Cite your sources with MLA in-text citations
• List all sources cited on a Works Cited page at the end

To format a paper in APA Style , follow these guidelines:

• Use a standard font like 12 pt Times New Roman or 11 pt Arial
• If submitting for publication, insert a running head on every page
• Apply APA heading styles
• Cite your sources with APA in-text citations
• List all sources cited on a reference page at the end

No, it’s not appropriate to present new arguments or evidence in the conclusion . While you might be tempted to save a striking argument for last, research papers follow a more formal structure than this.

All your findings and arguments should be presented in the body of the text (more specifically in the results and discussion sections if you are following a scientific structure). The conclusion is meant to summarize and reflect on the evidence and arguments you have already presented, not introduce new ones.

The conclusion of a research paper has several key elements you should make sure to include:

• A restatement of the research problem
• A summary of your key arguments and/or findings
• A short discussion of the implications of your research

Don’t feel that you have to write the introduction first. The introduction is often one of the last parts of the research paper you’ll write, along with the conclusion.

This is because it can be easier to introduce your paper once you’ve already written the body ; you may not have the clearest idea of your arguments until you’ve written them, and things can change during the writing process .

The way you present your research problem in your introduction varies depending on the nature of your research paper . A research paper that presents a sustained argument will usually encapsulate this argument in a thesis statement .

A research paper designed to present the results of empirical research tends to present a research question that it seeks to answer. It may also include a hypothesis —a prediction that will be confirmed or disproved by your research.

Ask our team

Want to contact us directly? No problem.  We  are always here for you.

• Email [email protected]
• Start live chat
• Call +1 (510) 822-8066
• WhatsApp +31 20 261 6040

Our team helps students graduate by offering:

• A world-class citation generator
• Plagiarism Checker software powered by Turnitin
• Innovative Citation Checker software
• Professional proofreading services
• Over 300 helpful articles about academic writing, citing sources, plagiarism, and more

Scribbr specializes in editing study-related documents . We proofread:

• PhD dissertations
• Research proposals
• Personal statements
• Admission essays
• Motivation letters
• Reflection papers
• Journal articles
• Capstone projects

Scribbr’s Plagiarism Checker is powered by elements of Turnitin’s Similarity Checker , namely the plagiarism detection software and the Internet Archive and Premium Scholarly Publications content databases .

The add-on AI detector is powered by Scribbr’s proprietary software.

The Scribbr Citation Generator is developed using the open-source Citation Style Language (CSL) project and Frank Bennett’s citeproc-js . It’s the same technology used by dozens of other popular citation tools, including Mendeley and Zotero.

You can find all the citation styles and locales used in the Scribbr Citation Generator in our publicly accessible repository on Github .