importance of study in business research

How Newly Qualified Nurse Practitioners can Regulate Work-Life Balance

importance of study in business research

What Are The Benefits Of Retail Virtual Merchandising?

How to Achieve an Organic Link-Building Presence

Business research: types, benefits, and its importance.

Business research is a process of obtaining a detailed study of all the business areas including the market and the customers and using that information to maximize the sales & profit of the business.

When you run a business, there are several things you can research on. You research everything from market shares to sales. Business research helps you make intelligent and informed decisions and identify the key areas to invest your money in.

For example, an automobile company plans to unveil the latest car model in the market. For that, they need to develop strategies to explore and monitor customer demand. So, the company will conduct research to collect information and analyze market trends. This will help them draw better conclusions and come up with a fine quality car at the right price resulting in a larger market share.

Types of Business Research

Researchers use various research methods to collect relevant data so that business enterprises can make wiser decisions. There are two main types of methods to carry out business research.

Quantitative Business Research It is a method of analyzing the largest group that meets your target goals. It uses mathematical techniques and data to explain the important stats about your business and market. Usually, this data uses multiple-choice questionnaires that can help you be profitable with your sales. For instance, quantitative research can answer questions such as;
Are your customers aware of the services or products you offer?
How many people are interested in buying your products or services?
Who are your best customers and what are their buying habits?
How long the visitor stays on your website, and which is their exit page?

The result of quantitative business research is in the numerical form, such as;

40% of customers rate the new product as “attractive”
70% of prospective customers use the Internet to book their hotel room
6 out of 10 customers will buy a new food product after trying the free in-store sample

The quantitative research methods include various surveys such as postal, telephone, online, and face-to-face.

Qualitative Business Research

This business research focuses on attitudes, intentions, and beliefs. Qualitative research includes questions such as “Why”? or “How?”.

The aim of this research is to gain insights into customers’ distinct behaviors and response to a new product. This research is beneficial for your new products and marketing initiatives to test reactions and rectify your approach.

You can collect qualitative data using common methods such as case studies, focus groups, and interviews. This data is often valuable but can be time-consuming and expensive to collect, especially for a small business or a startup.

Benefits of Business Research

Business Research helps you communicate with current and potential customers in a better way.
It helps you identify opportunities and threats in the marketplace.
It helps you minimize risks.
Business research is used to plan investments and financial outcomes effectively.
It helps you build a better market position.
It can keep you updated with current trends and innovations in the market.

Why is Business Research Important?

Business research helps businesses understand their customers’ buying patterns, preferences and pain points, gain deeper insights into the contenders, current market trends, and demographics. Using effective strategies to understand the demand and supply of the market, businesses can always stay ahead of the competition. Using business research, they can reduce costs and design solutions that aim at the market demand and their target audience.

Chances of failures are less with business research as it gives an idea of the target customers and the perfect time to launch a product. In addition, with a deep understanding of brand value, businesses can constantly innovate to meet customer requirements. This is essential to grow market share and revenue. The SWOT analysis in business research is crucial to make an informed decision and making the business a huge success.

Research is the building block of any business. It acts as a catalyst to thrive in the market. So, never underestimate the value of market research and leverage its benefits to give an extra edge to your business.

Authors Bio: Ritesh Patil is the co-founder of Mobisoft Infotech that helps startups and enterprises in mobile technology. He loves technology, especially mobile technology. He’s an avid blogger and writes on the mobile application. He works in a leading mobile app development company with skilled iOS and Android app developers.

ROBOTS SUBSCRIPTION

Privacy Overview

Skip to main content
Skip to primary sidebar
Skip to footer
QuestionPro

Solutions Industries Gaming Automotive Sports and events Education Government Travel & Hospitality Financial Services Healthcare Cannabis Technology Use Case AskWhy Communities Audience Contactless surveys Mobile LivePolls Member Experience GDPR Positive People Science 360 Feedback Surveys
Resources Blog eBooks Survey Templates Case Studies Training Help center

Home Market Research

Business Research: Methods, Types & Examples

Content Index

Business research: Definition

Quantitative research methods, qualitative research methods, advantages of business research, disadvantages of business research, importance of business research.

Business research is a process of acquiring detailed information on all the areas of business and using such information to maximize the sales and profit of the business. Such a study helps companies determine which product/service is most profitable or in demand. In simple words, it can be stated as the acquisition of information or knowledge for professional or commercial purposes to determine opportunities and goals for a business.

Business research can be done for anything and everything. In general, when people speak about business research design , it means asking research questions to know where the money can be spent to increase sales, profits, or market share. Such research is critical to make wise and informed decisions.

LEARN ABOUT: Research Process Steps

For example: A mobile company wants to launch a new model in the market. But they are not aware of what are the dimensions of a mobile that are in most demand. Hence, the company conducts business research using various methods to gather information, and the same is then evaluated, and conclusions are drawn as to what dimensions are most in demand.

This will enable the researcher to make wise decisions to position his phone at the right price in the market and hence acquire a larger market share.

LEARN ABOUT: Test Market Demand

Business research: Types and methodologies

Business research is a part of the business intelligence process. It is usually conducted to determine whether a company can succeed in a new region, to understand its competitors, or simply select a marketing approach for a product. This research can be carried out using steps in qualitative research methods or quantitative research methods.

Quantitative research methods are research methods that deal with numbers. It is a systematic empirical investigation using statistical, mathematical, or computational techniques . Such methods usually start with data collection and then proceed to statistical analysis using various methods. The following are some of the research methods used to carry out business research.

LEARN ABOUT: Data Management Framework

Survey research

Survey research is one of the most widely used methods to gather data, especially for conducting business research. Surveys involve asking various survey questions to a set of audiences through various types like online polls, online surveys, questionnaires, etc. Nowadays, most of the major corporations use this method to gather data and use it to understand the market and make appropriate business decisions.

Various types of surveys, like cross-sectional studies , which need to collect data from a set of audiences at a given point of time, or longitudinal surveys which are needed to collect data from a set of audiences across various time durations in order to understand changes in the respondents’ behavior are used to conduct survey research. With the advancement in technology, surveys can now be sent online through email or social media .

For example: A company wants to know the NPS score for their website i.e. how satisfied are people who are visiting their website. An increase in traffic to their website or the audience spending more time on a website can result in higher rankings on search engines which will enable the company to get more leads as well as increase its visibility.

Hence, the company can ask people who visit their website a few questions through an online survey to understand their opinions or gain feedback and hence make appropriate changes to the website to increase satisfaction.

Learn More: Business Survey Template

Correlational research

Correlational research is conducted to understand the relationship between two entities and what impact each one of them has on the other. Using mathematical analysis methods, correlational research enables the researcher to correlate two or more variables .

Such research can help understand patterns, relationships, trends, etc. Manipulation of one variable is possible to get the desired results as well. Generally, a conclusion cannot be drawn only on the basis of correlational research.

For example: Research can be conducted to understand the relationship between colors and gender-based audiences. Using such research and identifying the target audience, a company can choose the production of particular color products to be released in the market. This can enable the company to understand the supply and demand requirements of its products.

Causal-Comparative research

Causal-comparative research is a method based on the comparison. It is used to deduce the cause-effect relationship between variables. Sometimes also known as quasi-experimental research, it involves establishing an independent variable and analyzing the effects on the dependent variable.

In such research, data manipulation is not done; however, changes are observed in the variables or groups under the influence of the same changes. Drawing conclusions through such research is a little tricky as independent and dependent variables will always exist in a group. Hence all other parameters have to be taken into consideration before drawing any inferences from the research.

LEARN ABOUT: Causal Research

For example: Research can be conducted to analyze the effect of good educational facilities in rural areas. Such a study can be done to analyze the changes in the group of people from rural areas when they are provided with good educational facilities and before that.

Another example can be to analyze the effect of having dams and how it will affect the farmers or the production of crops in that area.

LEARN ABOUT: Market research trends

Experimental research

Experimental research is based on trying to prove a theory. Such research may be useful in business research as it can let the product company know some behavioral traits of its consumers, which can lead to more revenue. In this method, an experiment is carried out on a set of audiences to observe and later analyze their behavior when impacted by certain parameters.

LEARN ABOUT: Behavioral Targeting

For example: Experimental research was conducted recently to understand if particular colors have an effect on consumers’ hunger. A set of the audience was then exposed to those particular colors while they were eating, and the subjects were observed. It was seen that certain colors like red or yellow increase hunger.

Hence, such research was a boon to the hospitality industry. You can see many food chains like Mcdonalds, KFC, etc., using such colors in their interiors, brands, as well as packaging.

Another example of inferences drawn from experimental research, which is used widely by most bars/pubs across the world, is that loud music in the workplace or anywhere makes a person drink more in less time. This was proven through experimental research and was a key finding for many business owners across the globe.

Online research / Literature research

Literature research is one of the oldest methods available. It is very economical, and a lot of information can be gathered using such research. Online research or literature research involves gathering information from existing documents and studies, which can be available at Libraries, annual reports, etc.

Nowadays, with the advancement in technology, such research has become even more simple and accessible to everyone. An individual can directly research online for any information that is needed, which will give him in-depth information about the topic or the organization.

Such research is used mostly by marketing and salespeople in the business sector to understand the market or their customers. Such research is carried out using existing information that is available from various sources. However, care has to be taken to validate the sources from where the information is going to be collected.

For example , a salesperson has heard a particular firm is looking for some solution that their company provides. Hence, the salesperson will first search for a decision maker from the company, investigate what department he is from, and understand what the target company is looking for and what they are into.

Using this research, he can cater his solution to be spot on when he pitches it to this client. He can also reach out to the customer directly by finding a means to communicate with him by researching online.’

LEARN ABOUT: 12 Best Tools for Researchers

Qualitative research is a method that has a high importance in business research. Qualitative research involves obtaining data through open-ended conversational means of communication. Such research enables the researcher to not only understand what the audience thinks but also why he thinks it.

In such research, in-depth information can be gathered from the subjects depending on their responses. There are various types of qualitative research methods, such as interviews, focus groups, ethnographic research, content analysis, and case study research, that are widely used.

Such methods are of very high importance in business research as they enable the researcher to understand the consumer. What motivates the consumer to buy and what does not is what will lead to higher sales, and that is the prime objective for any business.

Following are a few methods that are widely used in today’s world by most businesses.

Interviews are somewhat similar to surveys, like sometimes they may have the same types of questions used. The difference is that the respondent can answer these open-ended questions at length, and the direction of the conversation or the questions being asked can be changed depending on the response of the subject.

Such a method usually gives the researcher detailed information about the perspective or opinions of its subject. Carrying out interviews with subject matter experts can also give important information critical to some businesses.

For example: An interview was conducted by a telecom manufacturer with a group of women to understand why they have less number of female customers. After interviewing them, the researcher understood that there were fewer feminine colors in some of the models, and females preferred not to purchase them.

Such information can be critical to a business such as a telecom manufacturer and hence it can be used to increase its market share by targeting women customers by launching some feminine colors in the market.

Another example would be to interview a subject matter expert in social media marketing. Such an interview can enable a researcher to understand why certain types of social media advertising strategies work for a company and why some of them don’t.

LEARN ABOUT: Qualitative Interview

Focus groups

Focus groups are a set of individuals selected specifically to understand their opinions and behaviors. It is usually a small set of a group that is selected keeping in mind the parameters for their target market audience to discuss a particular product or service. Such a method enables a researcher with a larger sample than the interview or a case study while taking advantage of conversational communication.

Focus group is also one of the best examples of qualitative data in education . Nowadays, focus groups can be sent online surveys as well to collect data and answer why, what, and how questions. Such a method is very crucial to test new concepts or products before they are launched in the market.

For example: Research is conducted with a focus group to understand what dimension of screen size is preferred most by the current target market. Such a method can enable a researcher to dig deeper if the target market focuses more on the screen size, features, or colors of the phone. Using this data, a company can make wise decisions about its product line and secure a higher market share.

Ethnographic research

Ethnographic research is one of the most challenging research but can give extremely precise results. Such research is used quite rarely, as it is time-consuming and can be expensive as well. It involves the researcher adapting to the natural environment and observing its target audience to collect data. Such a method is generally used to understand cultures, challenges, or other things that can occur in that particular setting.

For example: The world-renowned show “Undercover Boss” would be an apt example of how ethnographic research can be used in businesses. In this show, the senior management of a large organization works in his own company as a regular employee to understand what improvements can be made, what is the culture in the organization, and to identify hard-working employees and reward them.

It can be seen that the researcher had to spend a good amount of time in the natural setting of the employees and adapt to their ways and processes. While observing in this setting, the researcher could find out the information he needed firsthand without losing any information or any bias and improve certain things that would impact his business.

LEARN ABOUT: Workforce Planning Model

Case study research

Case study research is one of the most important in business research. It is also used as marketing collateral by most businesses to land up more clients. Case study research is conducted to assess customer satisfaction and document the challenges that were faced and the solutions that the firm gave them.

These inferences are made to point out the benefits that the customer enjoyed for choosing their specific firm. Such research is widely used in other fields like education, social sciences, and similar. Case studies are provided by businesses to new clients to showcase their capabilities, and hence such research plays a crucial role in the business sector.

For example: A services company has provided a testing solution to one of its clients. A case study research is conducted to find out what were the challenges faced during the project, what was the scope of their work, what objective was to be achieved, and what solutions were given to tackle the challenges.

The study can end with the benefits that the company provided through its solutions, like reduced time to test batches, easy implementation or integration of the system, or even cost reduction. Such a study showcases the capability of the company, and hence it can be stated as empirical evidence of the new prospect.

Website visitor profiling/research

Website intercept surveys or website visitor profiling/research is something new that has come up and is quite helpful in the business sector. It is an innovative approach to collect direct feedback from your website visitors using surveys. In recent times a lot of business generation happens online, and hence it is important to understand the visitors of your website as they are your potential customers.

Collecting feedback is critical to any business, as without understanding a customer, no business can be successful. A company has to keep its customers satisfied and try to make them loyal customers in order to stay on top.

A website intercept survey is an online survey that allows you to target visitors to understand their intent and collect feedback to evaluate the customers’ online experience. Information like visitor intention, behavior path, and satisfaction with the overall website can be collected using this.

Depending on what information a company is looking for, multiple forms of website intercept surveys can be used to gather responses. Some of the popular ones are Pop-ups, also called Modal boxes, and on-page surveys.

For example: A prospective customer is looking for a particular product that a company is selling. Once he is directed to the website, an intercept survey will start noting his intent and path. Once the transaction has been made, a pop-up or an on-page survey is provided to the customer to rate the website.

Such research enables the researcher to put this data to good use and hence understand the customers’ intent and path and improve any parts of the website depending on the responses, which in turn would lead to satisfied customers and hence, higher revenues and market share.

LEARN ABOUT: Qualitative Research Questions and Questionnaires

Business research helps to identify opportunities and threats.
It helps identify research problems , and using this information, wise decisions can be made to tackle the issue appropriately.
It helps to understand customers better and hence can be useful to communicate better with the customers or stakeholders.
Risks and uncertainties can be minimized by conducting business research in advance.
Financial outcomes and investments that will be needed can be planned effectively using business research.
Such research can help track competition in the business sector.
Business research can enable a company to make wise decisions as to where to spend and how much.
Business research can enable a company to stay up-to-date with the market and its trends, and appropriate innovations can be made to stay ahead in the game.
Business research helps to measure reputation management
Business research can be a high-cost affair
Most of the time, business research is based on assumptions
Business research can be time-consuming
Business research can sometimes give you inaccurate information because of a biased population or a small focus group.
Business research results can quickly become obsolete because of the fast-changing markets

Business research is one of the most effective ways to understand customers, the market, and competitors. Such research helps companies to understand the demand and supply of the market. Using such research will help businesses reduce costs and create solutions or products that are targeted to the demand in the market and the correct audience.

In-house business research can enable senior management to build an effective team or train or mentor when needed. Business research enables the company to track its competitors and hence can give you the upper hand to stay ahead of them.

Failures can be avoided by conducting such research as it can give the researcher an idea if the time is right to launch its product/solution and also if the audience is right. It will help understand the brand value and measure customer satisfaction which is essential to continuously innovate and meet customer demands.

This will help the company grow its revenue and market share. Business research also helps recruit ideal candidates for various roles in the company. By conducting such research, a company can carry out a SWOT analysis , i.e. understand the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. With the help of this information, wise decisions can be made to ensure business success.

LEARN ABOUT: Market research industry

Business research is the first step that any business owner needs to set up his business to survive or to excel in the market. The main reason why such research is of utmost importance is that it helps businesses to grow in terms of revenue, market share, and brand value.

MORE LIKE THIS

Age Gating: Effective Strategies for Online Content Control

Aug 23, 2024

Customer Experience Lessons from 13,000 Feet — Tuesday CX Thoughts

Aug 20, 2024

Insight: Definition & meaning, types and examples

Aug 19, 2024

Employee Loyalty: Strategies for Long-Term Business Success

Other categories.

Academic Research
Artificial Intelligence
Assessments
Brand Awareness
Case Studies
Communities
Consumer Insights
Customer effort score
Customer Engagement
Customer Experience
Customer Loyalty
Customer Research
Customer Satisfaction
Employee Benefits
Employee Engagement
Employee Retention
Friday Five
General Data Protection Regulation
Insights Hub
Life@QuestionPro
Market Research
Mobile diaries
Mobile Surveys
New Features
Online Communities
Question Types
Questionnaire
QuestionPro Products
Release Notes
Research Tools and Apps
Revenue at Risk
Survey Templates
Training Tips
Tuesday CX Thoughts (TCXT)
Uncategorized
What’s Coming Up
Workforce Intelligence

Root out friction in every digital experience, super-charge conversion rates, and optimize digital self-service

Uncover insights from any interaction, deliver AI-powered agent coaching, and reduce cost to serve

Increase revenue and loyalty with real-time insights and recommendations delivered to teams on the ground

Know how your people feel and empower managers to improve employee engagement, productivity, and retention

Take action in the moments that matter most along the employee journey and drive bottom line growth

Whatever they’re are saying, wherever they’re saying it, know exactly what’s going on with your people

Get faster, richer insights with qual and quant tools that make powerful market research available to everyone

Run concept tests, pricing studies, prototyping + more with fast, powerful studies designed by UX research experts

Track your brand performance 24/7 and act quickly to respond to opportunities and challenges in your market

Explore the platform powering Experience Management

Free Account
Product Demos
For Digital
For Customer Care
For Human Resources
For Researchers
Financial Services
All Industries

Popular Use Cases

Customer Experience
Employee Experience
Net Promoter Score
Voice of Customer
Customer Success Hub
Product Documentation
Training & Certification
XM Institute
Popular Resources
Customer Stories
Artificial Intelligence

Market Research

Partnerships
Marketplace

The annual gathering of the experience leaders at the world’s iconic brands building breakthrough business results, live in Salt Lake City.

English/AU & NZ
Español/Europa
Español/América Latina
Português Brasileiro
REQUEST DEMO
Experience Management
Business Research

Try Qualtrics for free

Business research: definition, types & methods.

10 min read What is business research and why does it matter? Here are some of the ways business research can be helpful to your company, whichever method you choose to carry it out.

What is business research?

Business research helps companies make better business decisions by gathering information. The scope of the term business research is quite broad – it acts as an umbrella that covers every aspect of business, from finances to advertising creative. It can include research methods which help a company better understand its target market. It could focus on customer experience and assess customer satisfaction levels. Or it could involve sizing up the competition through competitor research.

Often when carrying out business research, companies are looking at their own data, sourced from their employees, their customers and their business records. However, business researchers can go beyond their own company in order to collect relevant information and understand patterns that may help leaders make informed decisions. For example, a business may carry out ethnographic research where the participants are studied in the context of their everyday lives, rather than just in their role as consumer, or look at secondary data sources such as open access public records and empirical research carried out in academic studies.

There is also a body of knowledge about business in general that can be mined for business research purposes. For example organizational theory and general studies on consumer behavior.

Free eBook: 2024 global market research trends report

Why is business research important?

We live in a time of high speed technological progress and hyper-connectedness. Customers have an entire market at their fingertips and can easily switch brands if a competitor is offering something better than you are. At the same time, the world of business has evolved to the point of near-saturation. It’s hard to think of a need that hasn’t been addressed by someone’s innovative product or service.

The combination of ease of switching, high consumer awareness and a super-evolved marketplace crowded with companies and their offerings means that businesses must do whatever they can to find and maintain an edge. Business research is one of the most useful weapons in the fight against business obscurity, since it allows companies to gain a deep understanding of buyer behavior and stay up to date at all times with detailed information on their market.

Thanks to the standard of modern business research tools and methods, it’s now possible for business analysts to track the intricate relationships between competitors, financial markets, social trends, geopolitical changes, world events, and more.

Find out how to conduct your own market research and make use of existing market research data with our Ultimate guide to market research

Types of business research

Business research methods vary widely, but they can be grouped into two broad categories – qualitative research and quantitative research .

Qualitative research methods

Qualitative business research deals with non-numerical data such as people’s thoughts, feelings and opinions. It relies heavily on the observations of researchers, who collect data from a relatively small number of participants – often through direct interactions.

Qualitative research interviews take place one-on-one between a researcher and participant. In a business context, the participant might be a customer, a supplier, an employee or other stakeholder. Using open-ended questions , the researcher conducts the interview in either a structured or unstructured format. Structured interviews stick closely to a question list and scripted phrases, while unstructured interviews are more conversational and exploratory. As well as listening to the participant’s responses, the interviewer will observe non-verbal information such as posture, tone of voice and facial expression.

Focus groups

Like the qualitative interview, a focus group is a form of business research that uses direct interaction between the researcher and participants to collect data. In focus groups , a small number of participants (usually around 10) take part in a group discussion led by a researcher who acts as moderator. The researcher asks questions and takes note of the responses, as in a qualitative research interview. Sampling for focus groups is usually purposive rather than random, so that the group members represent varied points of view.

Observational studies

In an observational study, the researcher may not directly interact with participants at all, but will pay attention to practical situations, such as a busy sales floor full of potential customers, or a conference for some relevant business activity. They will hear people speak and watch their interactions , then record relevant data such as behavior patterns that relate to the subject they are interested in. Observational studies can be classified as a type of ethnographic research. They can be used to gain insight about a company’s target audience in their everyday lives, or study employee behaviors in actual business situations.

Ethnographic Research

Ethnographic research is an immersive design of research where one observes peoples’ behavior in their natural environment. Ethnography was most commonly found in the anthropology field and is now practices across a wide range of social sciences.

Ehnography is used to support a designer’s deeper understanding of the design problem – including the relevant domain, audience(s), processes, goals and context(s) of use.

The ethnographic research process is a popular methodology used in the software development lifecycle. It helps create better UI/UX flow based on the real needs of the end-users.

If you truly want to understand your customers’ needs, wants, desires, pain-points “walking a mile” in their shoes enables this. Ethnographic research is this deeply rooted part of research where you truly learn your targe audiences’ problem to craft the perfect solution.

Case study research

A case study is a detailed piece of research that provides in depth knowledge about a specific person, place or organization. In the context of business research, case study research might focus on organizational dynamics or company culture in an actual business setting, and case studies have been used to develop new theories about how businesses operate. Proponents of case study research feel that it adds significant value in making theoretical and empirical advances. However its detractors point out that it can be time consuming and expensive, requiring highly skilled researchers to carry it out.

Quantitative research methods

Quantitative research focuses on countable data that is objective in nature. It relies on finding the patterns and relationships that emerge from mass data – for example by analyzing the material posted on social media platforms, or via surveys of the target audience. Data collected through quantitative methods is empirical in nature and can be analyzed using statistical techniques. Unlike qualitative approaches, a quantitative research method is usually reliant on finding the right sample size, as this will determine whether the results are representative. These are just a few methods – there are many more.

Surveys are one of the most effective ways to conduct business research. They use a highly structured questionnaire which is distributed to participants, typically online (although in the past, face to face and telephone surveys were widely used). The questions are predominantly closed-ended, limiting the range of responses so that they can be grouped and analyzed at scale using statistical tools. However surveys can also be used to get a better understanding of the pain points customers face by providing open field responses where they can express themselves in their own words. Both types of data can be captured on the same questionnaire, which offers efficiency of time and cost to the researcher.

Correlational research

Correlational research looks at the relationship between two entities, neither of which are manipulated by the researcher. For example, this might be the in-store sales of a certain product line and the proportion of female customers subscribed to a mailing list. Using statistical analysis methods, researchers can determine the strength of the correlation and even discover intricate relationships between the two variables. Compared with simple observation and intuition, correlation may identify further information about business activity and its impact, pointing the way towards potential improvements and more revenue.

Experimental research

It may sound like something that is strictly for scientists, but experimental research is used by both businesses and scholars alike. When conducted as part of the business intelligence process, experimental research is used to test different tactics to see which ones are most successful – for example one marketing approach versus another. In the simplest form of experimental research, the researcher identifies a dependent variable and an independent variable. The hypothesis is that the independent variable has no effect on the dependent variable, and the researcher will change the independent one to test this assumption. In a business context, the hypothesis might be that price has no relationship to customer satisfaction. The researcher manipulates the price and observes the C-Sat scores to see if there’s an effect.

The best tools for business research

You can make the business research process much quicker and more efficient by selecting the right tools. Business research methods like surveys and interviews demand tools and technologies that can store vast quantities of data while making them easy to access and navigate. If your system can also carry out statistical analysis, and provide predictive recommendations to help you with your business decisions, so much the better.

Related resources

Market intelligence 10 min read, marketing insights 11 min read, ethnographic research 11 min read, qualitative vs quantitative research 13 min read, qualitative research questions 11 min read, qualitative research design 12 min read, primary vs secondary research 14 min read, request demo.

Ready to learn more about Qualtrics?

45,000+ students realised their study abroad dream with us. Take the first step today

Here’s your new year gift, one app for all your, study abroad needs, start your journey, track your progress, grow with the community and so much more.

Verification Code

An OTP has been sent to your registered mobile no. Please verify

Thanks for your comment !

Our team will review it before it's shown to our readers.

Business Research: Types, Methods, Examples

Updated on
Jan 29, 2024

Ever wondered what it takes to build a flourishing business ? Aiming to provide maximum sales and profit, business research helps you to gather comprehensive information about your business and accordingly make relevant changes if required. So, in this process of being successful, we gather all types of data to better define our strategies and understand what products or services customers want. And in case, you’re planning to expand your business, research can help you determine your odds of positive results. In this blog, we’ll help you understand the basics of research and analysis .

“Whoever gets closer to the customer, wins.” – Bernadette Jiwa

This Blog Includes:

What is business research, business research example, importance of business research, types & methods, focus groups , case study research , ethnographic research, survey , correlation research , experimental research , advantages and disadvantages of business research, scope of business research, role of business research, business research books, business research report, top 10 tools for business research, business research partners, top 10 business research topics, career prospects , [bonus] best mba colleges in the world.

Business Research can be simply defined as a process of gathering comprehensive data and information on all the areas of business and incorporating this information for sales and profit maximization. If you are wondering what is Business Research, it is a systematic management activity helping companies to determine which product will be most profitable for companies to produce. Also, there are multiple steps in conducting research, with each thoroughly reviewed to ensure that the best decision is made for the company as a whole.

Also Read: Scope of MBA in International Business

Let’s say there’s an automobile company that is planning to launch a car that runs on CNG. To promote cleaner fuel, the company will be involved in developing different plans and strategies to identify the demand for the car they intend to launch. Other than this, the company will also look for competitors, and the target audience, keeping in mind the distribution of CNG in India. Hence the research is conducted on various ideas to formulate a sustainable and more efficient design.

When it comes to the question of why Business Research is important, it has an essential role to play in varied areas of business. Here are some of the reasons describing the importance of Business Research:

It helps businesses gain better insights into their target customer’s preferences, buying patterns, pain points, as well as demographics.
Business Research also provides businesses with a detailed overview of their target markets, what’s in trend, as well as market demand.
By studying consumers’ buying patterns and preferences as well as market trends and demands with the help of business research, businesses can effectively and efficiently curate the best possible plans and strategies accordingly.
The importance of business research also lies in highlighting the areas where unnecessary costs can be minimized and those areas in a business which need more attention and can bring in more customers and hence boost profits.
Businesses can constantly innovate as per their customers’ preferences and interests and keep their attention on the brand.
Business Research also plays the role of a catalyst as it helps businesses thrive in their markets by capturing all the available opportunities and also meeting the needs and preferences of their customers.

Also Read: Business Analyst vs Data Analyst

Business research plays an important role in the business intelligence process. This is usually conducted to determine if a company can succeed in a new region through competitive analyses and a better marketing approach. Due to this, this broad field has been distinguished into two types namely, Qualitative Research and Quantitative Research Method.

Here are the most important types of Business Research :

Qualitative Research Methods

It involves putting open-ended questions to the audience through different channels of communication to understand why researchers think in a particular manner. Stress is laid on understanding the intent, attitude, and beliefs to figure out the behaviour and response of the customers. Moreover, the goal of Qualitative Business Research is to get in-depth knowledge about the subjects of the research. Moreover, qualitative research enables us to put the perspective of the consumer in front of the researcher so that we can understand and see the alignment of the ideas between the market and the business.

The data collected in this type of business research is by the following methods:

Interviews
Case Study
Ethnographic Research
Website Visitor Profiling
Content Analysis

Also Read: Study MBA in Music Business at Berklee College of Music!

Let us take a detailed look at some of the ways-

Interviews and surveys are similar. The only difference lies in the fact that the responder can put a question in an interview whilst it is not possible during a survey. Through interviews, it is easier to understand the detailed perspective of the person concerning the subject of research. A mobile brand researched to understand why certain colours are preferred by male and female customers. The research revealed that since red is assumed to be a feminine colour, it is more preferred by females than males.

Focus groups are a type of business research that involves only a set of individuals. Each selected individual represents a particular category of the target market. The major difference between interviews and focus groups is the number of people that it involves. To launch a new product for a particular group of society, focus groups prove to be the best way to understand the needs of the local audience.

For example, Tesla decides to launch their latest car model in India. The company, therefore, will require feedback from the Indian audience only.

Did you know? Amazon, the internet giant changed its payment strategy to enter the Indian market. Since the Indian economy was not entirely ready for online modes of payment, amazon introduced a new payment method and came up with ‘ cash on delivery ’ to gain consumers’ trust.

One of the most effective ways for business research is conducting case studies. With the motive to understand customer satisfaction, challenges that usually the customers face while using the product and hence, providing them with the right solution can be achieved by analysing data secured through data secured by case studies. Case study researchers are conducted in many fields of business that ultimately aid organisations in improving their products or services.

Ethnographic Research refers to understanding people as a whole. One must be able to grok their consumers or target audience which will help identify patterns, flaws, etc. Ethnography is a branch of anthropology that is the study of what elements or features make us humans. How did people live? What aspect made us so dependent on smartphones and technology? Why would people buy one product over the other? It refers to asking questions about lifestyle, communities, etc., and trying to gain insight into consumer behaviour and buying patterns.

For example, consider a random product. Are people looking for that product? Do they need it? Is it a necessity or a luxury? Which class of people are most likely to buy it? People often cannot comprehend what they are looking for. Gaining different perceptions can help us tailor our products accordingly to the consumers. Who would have thought that the majority of humans will need face masks for survival?

Also Read: How to Become a Research Analyst?

Quantitative Research Methods

With the employment of mathematical, statistical and computational techniques, quantitative research is carried out to deal with numbers. This systematical empirical investigation starts with the acquisition of the data and then moves on to analyzing it with the help of different tools. The goal is to identify clientele and then meet the targets of the audience. As the method of business research employs a questionnaire to determine the audience’s response, the questions are built around the idea that the audience knows about the product or the services that the firm offers. Some of the key questions answered in quantitative research methods include, who is connected with your network, how they qualify for the ‘product’ or how regularly they visit your website.

The data is collected based on the following research:

Correlational
Online
Casual Comparative
Experimental

It is the most common method under quantitative research via which a huge amount of data can be collected concerning a product or service. A common set of questions are asked to the people and they are asked to provide their inputs. To understand the nature of the market in-depth, this method is massively used by leading organisations all across the globe. Analysing data recorded through service helps organisations make suitable decisions.

Under this research, usually two entities are put together to examine the impact they create on each other. As suggested by the name it is the best process to understand patterns, relationships and trends. the data grasped through correlation research is generally combined with other tools as one cannot achieve a firm conclusion using this type of business research.

Experimental research is purely based on proving a particular theory that is pre-assumed. True experimental research companies can understand varied behavioural traits of the customers that further assist them in generating more revenue. Exposing a set of audience to common parameters, their behaviour is recorded and hence analysed. This can be understood as the main basis of the experimental research.

Team Leverage Edu

8 Universities with higher ROI than IITs and IIMs

Grab this one-time opportunity to download this ebook

Connect With Us

45,000+ students realised their study abroad dream with us. take the first step today..

Resend OTP in

Need help with?

Study abroad.

UK, Canada, US & More

IELTS, GRE, GMAT & More

Scholarship, Loans & Forex

Country Preference

New Zealand

Which English test are you planning to take?

Which academic test are you planning to take.

Not Sure yet

When are you planning to take the exam?

Already booked my exam slot

Within 2 Months

Want to learn about the test

Which Degree do you wish to pursue?

When do you want to start studying abroad.

September 2024

January 2025

What is your budget to study abroad?

How would you describe this article ?

Please rate this article

We would like to hear more.

Market Research Blog

Nature, scope and significance of business research.

Business market research is a dynamic concept. One of the key components of market research studies is the strategic inquiry into a business situation or environment to establish the actuality or evidence that may have led to the development of certain trends. Today, business research is the pillar that supports decision-making in various areas of an organization. Prior to conducting proactive business research, it is crucial to determine the underlying objectives of the research program to come up with an accurately targeted approach. The significance of business research is that it is a fact-finding mission that fuels successful decision-making in a corporate environment. Let us take a look at the nature, scope, and significance of business research.

What is Involved in Business Research?

Business research is the process of gathering thorough information on all aspects of a company's operations and applying that information to improve operational excellence, which can lead to an increase in sales and profits.

A study like this can assist businesses in figuring the product or service that is most profitable.
It entails determining where money should be spent to boost sales, profitability, or/and market share.

Given the increasing competition in all industries, market research has become extremely necessary to make intelligent and informed decisions that fuel business growth.

The Nature of Business Research

In business, knowledge is power. The ability to make informed decisions is crucial for any organization's success and growth. To achieve this, businesses rely on research—a systematic inquiry that helps unravel complex problems, discover insights, and explore new opportunities. Business research involves a structured investigation aimed at collecting and analyzing data to address specific business challenges or explore potential opportunities. This often includes conducting market research studies and producing business research reports based on the research findings. It is a multi-faceted process that employs various methodologies, including quantitative and qualitative techniques, to acquire knowledge that drives decision-making. While quantitative research focuses on numerical data and statistical analysis, qualitative research emphasizes an in-depth understanding of subjective experiences, opinions, and motivations. From problem identification to market analysis and decision support, research empowers businesses to navigate complexities, adapt to change, and seize opportunities. Investing in robust research practices can help organizations lay the foundation for sustainable growth and success. It is crucial to hire a reputable business research company with proven experience in providing specialized business market research services.

The Scope of Business Research

The scope and significance of business research are immense. In this section, we will discuss how top business research companies like Unimrkt Research can help your organization navigate the complicated fabric of today’s dynamic business world and build a profitable venture that stands the test of time.

Problem Identification

Business research plays a vital role in identifying and defining the problems that organizations face. It helps clarify issues, determine their root causes, and establish clear objectives for further investigation. By gaining a comprehensive understanding of the challenges, businesses can develop effective strategies to overcome them.

Market Analysis and Competitive Intelligence

Researching the market landscape and understanding customer preferences are fundamental to success. A business research company enables businesses to analyze market trends, consumer behavior, and competitor strategies. This knowledge aids in developing tailored products, crafting targeted marketing campaigns, and staying ahead of the competition.

Decision Support

Robust research provides decision-makers with reliable information, enabling them to make informed choices. Whether it's launching a new product, expanding into new markets, or modifying existing strategies, data-backed decisions reduce uncertainty and enhance the chances of achieving the desired outcomes.

Innovation and Adaptation

Business research facilitates innovation by uncovering emerging trends, technological advancements, and changing consumer needs. By staying abreast of industry developments, organizations can adapt quickly and identify growth opportunities. Research also aids in identifying potential risks and threats, allowing businesses to proactively mitigate them.

Performance Evaluation

To sustain success, businesses must evaluate their performance regularly. Research provides valuable insights into key performance indicators, customer satisfaction levels, and operational efficiency. By analyzing this data, companies can identify areas for improvement, optimize processes, and enhance overall performance.

Importance of Business Research

Business research is one of the most effective ways to understand your customers and the overall market, as well as analyze competitors. This type of research aids businesses in determining market demand and supply. It can help business organizations to cut unnecessary expenses and develop tailor-made solutions or products that appeal to the demand in the market. Research for startups aids in gathering information for professional or commercial purposes to assess business prospects and goals. Business research can also help startups find the right audience profile for their offerings. It is the holy grail when looking to achieve success in the modern, ultra-competitive business world.

Key Advantages of Business Research

Here are some of the key advantages of business research:

Market research can help organizations gain a better perspective and understanding of their market or target audience. This ensures that the company stays ahead of its competitors.
Primary and secondary research can act as an insurance policy against obvious but silent dangers on your business path.
Market research findings help organizations learn from their weaknesses and adapt to new business environments.
By using certain research methodologies for competitor analysis, you can capitalize on your new-found knowledge to steer ahead of the competition.
Regular market research initiatives help take the ‘pulse’ of hot market trends, allowing you to come up with “superhit” products and services.
It helps with market forecasting, which allows you to project future numbers, characteristics, and trends within your target market.

Significance of Business Research in Local and Global Business Fields

Today, top market research companies are focusing on the assessment of both local and international business environments. A business research company takes factors such as markets (global and domestic), goods and services, and other business elements into account to conduct a progressive and strategic study. The significance of business research is such that it has become a crucial predictor of organizational effectiveness, as it determines the perception, quality, and sustainability of several performance factors. For example, in a traditional manufacturing concern, business research can help with aspects like product refinement, distribution networks, competitiveness module design, and customer demand tracking, among other things.

Key Steps in Conducting Business Research

Here are the key steps involved when conducting business research. By following these steps, businesses can develop and conduct systematic and effective research programs that provide valuable insights, supporting informed decision-making.

Identify and Define the Research Problem

Clearly articulate the specific business challenge or opportunity that you aim to address through research. Define the problem in a concise and focused manner, ensuring clarity and alignment with organizational objectives.

Develop Research Objectives

Establish clear and measurable research objectives that align with the identified problem. These objectives will guide the entire research process and help ensure that the outcomes are relevant and actionable.

Design the Research Methodology

Select the appropriate research methodology based on the nature of the problem and the data needed. This may involve choosing between quantitative and qualitative approaches, or a combination of both. Determine the research design, sampling techniques, data collection methods, and tools to be used.

Collect Data

Implement the data collection methods defined in the research design process. This could involve conducting surveys, interviews, observations, or analyzing existing data sources. Ensure the data collected is reliable, valid, and relevant to the research objectives.

Analyze Data

Process and analyze the collected data using appropriate statistical or qualitative analysis techniques. Identify patterns, trends, and insights that emerge from the data. Use software tools or statistical packages, if required, to aid in data analysis.

Interpret Findings

Interpret the analyzed data in the context of the research objectives and the original problem. Draw meaningful conclusions and insights from the findings. Relate the findings to existing theories or industry benchmarks, if applicable.

Communicate Results

Prepare a comprehensive report or presentation that effectively communicates the research findings, insights, and recommendations. Present the information in a concise, clear, and visually appealing manner. Tailor the communication to the intended audience, highlighting the implications and actionable steps.

Validate and Verify

Seek feedback and validation from stakeholders, colleagues, or experts to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the research findings. Incorporate their input and make any necessary revisions to strengthen the research outcomes.

Implement Recommendations

Translate the research findings into actionable recommendations or strategies. Develop an implementation plan and ensure buy-in from key stakeholders. Monitor and evaluate the progress and impact of the implemented recommendations.

Reflect and Learn

Reflect on the research process and outcomes. Identify lessons learned, strengths, and areas for improvement. This reflection can inform future research endeavors and enhance the organization's research capabilities.

The importance and significance of business research will only continue to grow with the changing business landscape. Business research has a direct impact on your organization’s success. The first and, perhaps, most important task for a business organization is to find the right market research company . This is where Unimrkt Research comes into play. Over the years, we have conducted industry research across 90 countries, spanning four continents in a variety of industries. We follow ESOMAR norms and are certified with the ISO 20252 and ISO 27001 standards. To learn about our business market research services, call +91 124 424 5210/+91 9870 377 557 or email [email protected] .

Share to FaceBook

Quick Enquiry

Customer Service, We Make it Better

Other Blogs

Relevance of Qualitative Market Research in Data Mining

Relevance of a telephone survey in a digital world

Significance of media research in today’s world

Relevance of research in the banking & finance industry

Top 5 Benefits of Online Panels

Get in Touch

Email us : sales@ unimrkt.com Call us : +91-124-424-5210

Stay connected for latest updates

Let's stay in touch subscribe to our newsletter..

Inquire With Us

Fill in the details and connect with us.

Thank you for sharing your email ID. We will get back to you soon.

Thank you!!!

Doing Research in Business and Management: An Essential Guide to Planning Your Project

Management Decision

ISSN : 0025-1747

Article publication date: 21 June 2013

Berbegal‐Mirabent, J. (2013), "Doing Research in Business and Management: An Essential Guide to Planning Your Project", Management Decision , Vol. 51 No. 6, pp. 1311-1316. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-06-2012-0505

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

“Publish or perish”. We've all heard this expression referring to the need academic, but especially PhD students and young academics have to make their research results public in order to promote and improve their contractual position, consolidating their careers. Nevertheless, it is also well‐known that this is a long‐distance race conditioned to the capacity to publish the research findings.

This means that students whether undergraduate, postgraduate or enrolled in a PhD programme need to develop their research knowledge from the very begging in order to refine their writing skills, paying attention to a large list of details and requirements which may vary from one situation to another. Indeed, academics invest innumerable hours and resources in writing their research results to succeed when submitting them to a peer‐reviewed journal. Therefore, it is not surprising that planning and writing a research project is often considered by inexperienced students as a challenging, time‐consuming and a demanding task. Yet, despite all these constraints, writing up the findings in a form that can be published and read for others, constitutes a very rewarding effort.

Emerging from the necessity to instruct students in acquiring the appropriate skills and abilities to effectively complete a research project, many courses are now incorporating a research module in their syllabuses as a mean to improve students' probabilities to succeed when doing so.

The editorial industry has also echoed these concerns and demands in the recent years, leading to the flowering of a large number of books and manuals addressing this issue (i.e. Bryman and Bell, 2011 ; Cooper and Schindler, 2011 ; Creswell, 2009 ; Flick, 2011 ; Sekaran, 2010 ). One of the most compelling books tackling this problem is Doing Research in Business and Management: An Essential Guide to Planning Your Project , written by Saunders and Lewis and published in 2012 by Pearson Education Limited.

Saunders and Lewis are experienced professors in teaching research methods in the fields of Business and Management. Indeed, they have published several books offering guidelines for students that need to conduct and produce a competent piece of research. According to the authors it is now fourteen years since their first book on research methods was printed. In 2009 the fifth edition was published ( Saunders et al. , 2009 ) and due to its popularity and good acceptance among academics and students they are now presenting this new and updated approach, providing a detailed coverage of all the relevant aspects (both theoretical and empirical) that may face students when carrying out a research project.

Combining their years of academic practice and their vast practical experience, with this book Andersen and Lewis aim at providing, in an accessible and friendly manner, some assistance to students and early career individuals who need to undertake an assessed research project by means of a written project report. This way, Doing Research in Business and Management provides a comprehensive and holistic overview of how to develop quality research in the fields of business and management, offering a detailed coverage of the relevant research approaches and methods used in these disciplines, and bringing together the essential components of the process of writing up a research project.

The authors take the reader through all the major stages involved in this process, introducing the different contexts and purposes that may guide a research project, as well as highlighting the key methods, strategies, tactics, programmes and processes that are recurrent in a management and business research context.

One noteworthy aspect of this book is that it takes extraordinary care to focus the reader on the logic and techniques of research methods using an accurate but simple language, that is, bearing in mind that the targeted audience is inexperienced students on undergraduate and postgraduate degree programmes in business, management or related disciplines, that may not yet be familiar with the language and style required by the scientific community. Therefore, employing a concise, highly accessible style and a logical structure, this book enables students that face for their first time the challenge of writing a research project to understand the practical relevance of research methods on business and management research. It also discusses the interrelationships of theoretical and empirical research, how these apply to practice, and the most recurrent software packages available in the market.

An important feature of this book is its clear structure and ease of reading. Furthermore, within each chapter, the use of illustrations, contemporary examples and key research terms placed in definition boxes to demystify their meaning, helps breaking up the text and brings it to life due to the practical perspective adopted. Certainly, it is presented in a logical and structured manner, organising the content in eight chapters that correspond to eight stages of the process of writing a research project.

Although the chapters follow a sequential order, the authors have written them in such a way that they stand alone, so any chapter in isolation make sense of it. Therefore, it is not necessary to read this book progressively from Chapter 1 through to Chapter 8, but allow readers to select those chapters that really match with their needs.

Each chapter follows a similar structure, starting with a brief summary that gives some ideas of the content and the approach adopted to afford the topic discussed (“Why read this chapter?”). Also each chapter contains a set of different examples to illustrate, from a practical point of view, some of the points addressed in the chapter (“Research in practice”). Every chapter ends with a “Thinking about” section, where the content is summarised in the form of concise and succinct bullets, and where authors make some suggestions on how to reinforce the contents learned.

Revising each chapter individually, Chapter 1 starts with some preliminary considerations on what is meant by a research process. Conducting research is something more than writing the findings using a formal language and a specific structure. It means to embark on a journey of discovery, where researchers have the chance to express their skills and resourcefulness demonstrating their abilities to carry out research projects of high quality.

Given these initial thoughts, Chapter 1 is then entirely devoted to the first matter academics come across: the selection of the research topic. As any process, a research project starts with the choice of a research theme. This is an issue entailing an extraordinary significance as the student/researcher should have to live with and live for, perhaps for a considerable period of time. Thus, it is important that the research topic matches with his/her expectations and motivations, contributing to the development of his/her personal skills and strengths, rather than being imposed by a supervisor.

The chapter follows with the main difficulties students face when choosing the research topic, and suggests novel ways in which to generate ideas, including for instance the use of relevant literature in the field to identify gaps that may constitute new research avenues. Discussions with friends and lecturers or drawing a concept map, are also listed as intermediate steps that may help filtering ideas, moving from the general to the specific question.

In the latter part of the chapter the authors focus on how to turn an idea into a research topic. At this point Sanders and Lewis recommend the use of the Russian doll principle ( Clough and Nutbrown, 2008 ), consisting of breaking down from the original statement to something which strips away all the complicated layers and obscurities until the heart of the question, in a similar fashion as the Russian doll is taken apart to reveal a tiny doll at the centre (p. 21).

Chapter 2 focuses on the subject of the literature review. A literature review is a very hard and time‐consuming process, as it should discuss relevant previous work and provide a comprehensive review of the major findings in the current area of study. This section is mandatory for any research project as it allows the researcher to demonstrate the need for a new study and that he/she has the appropriate background. Moreover, knowing what is known, it comes out easier to state what is still unknown, facilitating the identification of the gaps in the current understanding of the field, and making it simply to justify the research question(s) underlying the research and the context in which the study is going to be performed.

Thus, in this chapter the authors explain what constitutes an effective critical literature review, giving some ideas on how to start writing it and how to organise ideas and findings in a coherent logical argument.

A careful selection of the references to support statements and previous research findings is essential. In this sense, the authors make explicit differentiation of the main types and sources of literature available. A detailed description of the process of searching for obtaining the relevant literature is then provided, emphasising the use of an abstract to assess likely use of an article.

In accordance with the Harvard College Library (2006) , the authors also suggest that while reading, it is extremely important to take notes, summarise findings, compare information and contrast results. Likewise, they emphasise that a good literature review can lead to interesting insights into possible ways of collecting and analysing data.

Chapter 3 is concerned with how to manage the research process, focusing on four main aspects. First, questioning how to manage respondents, that is, how to access organisations for data collection. Here a set of six strategies are listed. Second, the authors focus on how to manage oneself in terms of keeping up the motivation, organising time and resources, and keeping in touch with individuals who may provide insightful comments on the work in progress. The relationship with the supervisor is believed to be indispensable, as he/she is expected to give advice at every stage of the process. But in order to succeed in this relationship, students are asked to report in a regular basis the partial results throughout the entire length of the project. A fourth issue deals with the management of the university context, that is, how to fit with the regulations, specific norms and other requirements imposed by the university. Paying special attention to the assessment criteria is also essential in order to guarantee that the research outcomes fulfil the requirements.

This chapter ends with a section covering the subject of research ethics, pointing out the key ethical principles and responsibilities that should be taken into account and that apply to all stages of any research process. This topic has perhaps been underexplored in the management and business literature; however it seems that it is now increasingly entering into the agendas of many academics ( Academy of Management, n.d. ; Frechtling and Boo, 2012 ; Payne, 2000 )).

Chapter 4 begins with a definition of what is meant by secondary data. A full definition is given, differentiating between qualitative and quantitative data and the possible transformation processes data may have suffered. Figure 4.1 (page 86) exhaustively summarises potential forms of secondary data according to their nature.

In this chapter the authors discuss the potential of using secondary data as a method for accessing large datasets and saving time and money, as they can often be found in the public domain as a result of the growth of the Internet. Nevertheless, secondary data also presents some pitfalls. For instance the authors emphasise that data are not always value‐neutral or only meet research needs partially. Although data available are rich and allows the creation of reliable variables, it is relevant to question whether the selected variables represent the core influential factors that match with the exact requirements of the study. The chapter ends with a list of some gateways to secondary data sources that are relevant for its broad scope and content.

Chapter 5 is entirely devoted to research strategy and design. Using the research onion metaphor presented in the authors' previous work ( Saunders et al. , 2009 ), Saunders and Lewis illustrate the different stages that conform the research process. Techniques and procedures for data collection and analysis are placed in the centre of the onion. As we move away from the centre we found the intermediate layers, where the strategies and choices have to be selected. Finally, the outer layers consider the research philosophies and approaches that embody the research. Building on this approach, the different layers of the onion are presented and complemented with readable examples. Definitions are also given, clarifying some terms that may be unknown for the freshman student, for instance, differences between inductive and deductive approaches, and alternative types of studies (exploratory, descriptive and explanatory).

This chapter also includes a section devoted to the description of different strategies that students may use in their attempt to answer their research question(s). Some useful insights are given on the use of experiments, surveys, case studies, action research methods, ethnography studies, grounded theory, archival research methods or the combination of any of the above. Although the aim of this book is not to in‐depth in the technical specifications behind these strategies, Saunders and Lewis provide the reader with the main features characterising each method. Further information on these approaches may be accompanied with the reading of the specific literature on each particular topic, such as Yin (2009) for case studies; the book of Berg and Lune (2008) with two chapters entirely focused on action research methods and ethnography studies; Corbin and Strauss (2008) and their approach to the grounded theory; or Ventresca and Mohr (2002) studying archival research methods. Correspondingly, the books of Miles and Huberman (1994) and Marshall and Rossman (2010) offer an exhaustive review of all aspects related to qualitative data analysis.

Chapter 6 pays attention to the methods used to collect data. The uses of different techniques and statistical procedures to obtain a sample that satisfies the research requirements, or how to draft an effective questionnaire, are some of the issues addressed in this chapter.

Part of this chapter is devoted to the importance of using a pilot test with a small group of respondents in order to corroborate the validity of a test/questionnaire before launching it to the whole sample. The chapter ends with some guidelines on how to successfully conduct interviews (either semi‐structured or unstructured), giving some examples on how to ask questions, how to interact with the respondent and how to prepare the material needed. A transcription of a potential interview is also provided.

The subject of Chapter 7 is about getting data ready for analysis, the use of different techniques for the analysis, and how to interpret the results obtained.

The chapter begins with the particularities of different types of data, namely quantitative and qualitative. Then the authors address each sort of data individually, first focusing on how to prepare and analyse quantitative data, and second, qualitative data. Essential statistical terms are defined, providing the reader with the basic instruments and techniques. Examples on how to interpret descriptives, correlation coefficients, associations between variables, predict cause‐effect relationships, or how to transcript an interview are provided, facilitating the understanding of those terms that the reader may not yet be familiar with. Screenshots of the most commonly used software packages for processing data are also introduced (i.e. SPSS, ATLAS.it, NVivo).

Writing an effective research proposal is a vital part of the research process. In the eighth and last chapter, the authors provide some insightful comments on the writing style students should adopt when compiling their research proposal and suggest some of the criteria against which the quality of the research project may be assessed.

Although each research process has its own particularities and layout, to a great extent, the content of a research project tends to follow a standardized structure: the title; an abstract; an introduction section presenting the research question(s); a review of the literature ending with the formulation of the hypotheses to be tested and the statement of the research objectives; a method section detailing how the research will be carried out; a discussion of the results; the conclusions and limitations of the study; and a list of the cited references. By way of conclusion, two research proposals are presented exemplifying all the aspects and issues discussed throughout the book.

Although the content of this book is quite predictable for a book of this type, it enables an effective learning process, representing a very useful guide for students planning or undertaking a research project or a dissertation in the fields of business and management. An eminently practical approach and a language free of an excessive use of technical terms helps students obtaining a thorough understanding of the main methodological issues a research project entails.

Therefore, taken as a whole, the value and rigour of this book is unquestionable, underpinning the strength of this publication.

A About the reviewer

Jasmina Berbegal‐Mirabent (PhD) received the MS degrees in Industrial Engineering and Industrial Scheduling, both from UPC BarcelonaTech (Spain) in 2008 and 2009, respectively. She is now working as an Associate Professor at the Department of Management at the UPC BarcelonaTech. She has been a Visiting Research Associate at the Institute of Education at the University of London. She has published her works in international and peer‐reviewed journals such as The Service Industries Journal , Management Decision , Journal of Technology Management & Innovation , Intangible Capital and Economía Industrial . She has recently been named Book Review Editor of Management Decision , and she is also on the editorial board of the Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management . Her research interests are in the areas of the management of higher education institutions and their role in regional development; academic entrepreneurship; and technology transfer. Jasmina Berbegal‐Mirabent can be contacted at: [email protected]

Academy of Management ( n.d. ), “Code of ethics”, available at: www.aomonline.org/aomPrint.asp?ID=268&page_ID=240 (accessed 19 July 2012).

Berg , B.L. and Lune , H. ( 2008 ), Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences , 8th ed., international edition, , Person Education , Boston, MA .

Bryman , A. and Bell , E. ( 2011 ), Business Research Methods , 3rd ed. , Oxford University Press , New York, NY .

Clough , P. and Nutbrown , C. ( 2008 ), A Student's Guide to Methodology , 2nd ed. , Sage Publications , London .

Cooper , D.R. and Schindler , P.S. ( 2011 ), Business Research Methods , 11th ed. , McGraw‐Hill Companies , New York, NY .

Corbin , J. and Strauss , A. ( 2008 ), Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 3rd ed. , Sage Publications , London .

Creswell , J.W. ( 2009 ), Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 3rd ed. , Sage Publications , Thousand Oaks, CA .

Flick , U. ( 2011 ), Introducing Research Methodology: A Beginner's Guide to Doing a Research , Sage Publications , Los Angeles, CA .

Frechtling , D.C. and Boo , S. ( 2012 ), “ On the ethics of management research: an exploratory investigation ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 106 No. 2 , pp. 149 ‐ 160 .

Harvard College Library ( 2006 ), “Interrogating text: 6 reading habits to develop in your first year at Harvard”, available at: http://hcl.harvard.edu/research/guides/lamont_handouts/interrogatingtexts.html (accessed 18 July 2012).

Marshall , C. and Rossman , G.B. ( 2010 ), Designing Qualitative Research , 5th ed. , Sage Publications , London .

Miles , M.B. and Huberman , A.M. ( 1994 ), Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 2nd ed. , Sage Publications , Beverly Hills, CA .

Payne , S.L. ( 2000 ), “ Challenges for research ethics and moral knowledge construction in the applied social sciences ”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 26 No. 4 , pp. 307 ‐ 318 .

Saunders , M. , Lewis , P. and Thornhill , A. ( 2009 ), Research Methods for Business Students , 5th ed. , Pearson Education , Harlow .

Sekaran , U. ( 2010 ), Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach , 5th ed. , John Wiley & Sons , New York, NY .

Ventresca , M.J. and Mohr , J.W. ( 2002 ), “ Archival research methods ”, in Baum , J.A.C. (Ed.), Companion to Organizations , Blackwell , New York, NY , pp. 805 ‐ 828 .

Yin , R.K. ( 2009 ), Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 5th ed. , Sage Publications , London .

All feedback is valuable.

Please share your general feedback

Report an issue or find answers to frequently asked questions

Contact Customer Support

About Stanford GSB

The Leadership
Dean’s Updates
School News & History
Commencement
Business, Government & Society
Centers & Institutes
Center for Entrepreneurial Studies
Center for Social Innovation
Stanford Seed

About the Experience

Learning at Stanford GSB
Experiential Learning
Guest Speakers
Entrepreneurship
Social Innovation
Communication
Life at Stanford GSB
Collaborative Environment
Activities & Organizations
Student Services
Housing Options
International Students

Full-Time Degree Programs

Why Stanford MBA
Academic Experience
Financial Aid
Why Stanford MSx
Research Fellows Program
See All Programs

Non-Degree & Certificate Programs

Executive Education
Stanford Executive Program
Programs for Organizations
The Difference
Online Programs
Stanford LEAD
Seed Transformation Program
Aspire Program
Seed Spark Program
Faculty Profiles
Academic Areas
Awards & Honors
Conferences

Faculty Research

Publications
Working Papers
Case Studies

Research Hub

Research Labs & Initiatives
Business Library
Data, Analytics & Research Computing
Behavioral Lab

Research Labs

Cities, Housing & Society Lab
Golub Capital Social Impact Lab

Research Initiatives

Corporate Governance Research Initiative
Corporations and Society Initiative
Policy and Innovation Initiative
Rapid Decarbonization Initiative
Stanford Latino Entrepreneurship Initiative
Value Chain Innovation Initiative
Venture Capital Initiative
Career & Success
Climate & Sustainability
Corporate Governance
Culture & Society
Finance & Investing
Government & Politics
Leadership & Management
Markets and Trade
Operations & Logistics
Opportunity & Access
Technology & AI
Opinion & Analysis
Email Newsletter

Welcome, Alumni

Communities
Digital Communities & Tools
Regional Chapters
Women’s Programs
Identity Chapters
Find Your Reunion
Career Resources
Job Search Resources
Career & Life Transitions
Programs & Webinars
Career Video Library
Alumni Education
Research Resources
Volunteering
Alumni News
Class Notes
Alumni Voices
Contact Alumni Relations
Upcoming Events

Admission Events & Information Sessions

MBA Program
MSx Program
PhD Program
Alumni Events
All Other Events

If/Then: Why Research Matters

In our season one wrap-up episode, Senior Associate Dean Jesper Sørensen discusses the importance of research.

July 25, 2024

To wrap up the first season of If/Then: Business, Leadership, Society , we invited Senior Associate Dean Jesper B. Sørensen into the studio to talk about the importance of research at Stanford Graduate School of Business. He shares insights on what motivates faculty to study what they do and how it impacts practitioners across industries.

“One of the challenges of being a great researcher is that you need to move away again from this kind of day-to-day reality.… I think a gift that a lot of our faculty have is to be able to both live in that very abstract kind of world and then make it relatable to somebody who’s not living in that world,” Sørensen says.

“Sometimes putting fundamental insights into practice is really hard. One of the hallmarks of research is trying to isolate particular mechanisms through various kinds of control. Scientists live in the world where it’s a vacuum, and so we just watch the leaf fall, and we can then time it and then tell you what the answer is,” Sørensen says. “And managers live in a world where the wind is blowing, and there’s all these kinds of forces getting in the way.”

In his conversation with podcast host Kevin Cool, Sørensen also shares his thoughts on three episodes from If/Then ’s first season.

Senior Editor, Stanford GSB

Listen & Subscribe

If/Then is a podcast from Stanford Graduate School of Business that examines research findings that can help us navigate the complex issues we face in business, leadership, and society. Each episode features an interview with a Stanford GSB faculty member.

Full Transcript

Note: Transcripts are generated by machine and lightly edited by humans. They may contain errors.

Kevin Cool: Hi again, everyone. I’m Kevin Cool, senior editor at the GSB and the host of If Then . We’ve had an interesting and enjoyable first season of 13 episodes, and we want to wrap up the season with a bonus 14th episode. And I’m delighted to invite into the studio today Jesper Sørensen, who’s a member of the leadership at the GSB.

Jesper is going to talk to us about research, how it gets done, what it means, why it’s important.

Kevin Cool: Welcome. Jesper, it’s a pleasure to have you here. We would like to start just by asking a very basic and fundamental question, which is why is research important? What difference does it make in the lives of everyday people?

(00:54) Jesper Sørensen: That’s a great question, and for professors like me, it’s an important question. I think one of the things that we have to remember is knowledge is discovered over time. Human society has evolved over time to have a deeper and deeper understanding of how things work. And that’s really what we call research, right? Taking and asking questions and then being disciplined and systematic about how you answer them.

Kevin Cool: And how is that enterprise different at a business school or is it different from say, the university more generally?

Jesper Sørensen: I think it’s more similar than different, but I think there is a difference in the sense that a business school is a professional school. We train MBA students and what we call MSX students, as well as PhD students. And what we want both our MBA students and our MSX students, what we want them to do is change lives, change organizations, and change the world.

We want to take basic insights about how humans work and apply that in their day-to-day lives. I often think that the managers and the leaders that come through the GSB in some ways have a much harder job than we scholars do. My colleagues might not be happy to hear that, but sometimes putting these fundamental insights into practice is really hard. One of the hallmarks of research is trying to isolate particular mechanisms through various kinds of control. Scientists live in the world where it’s a vacuum: and so we just watch the leaf fall and we can then time it and then tell you what the answer is.

And managers live in the world where the wind is blowing and there’s all these kinds of forces getting in the way. And so that’s really what’s challenging about management, but that’s also what makes it so exciting to be in a business school: you interact with the people who are dealing with the real problems. Other parts of a university are oftentimes embedded deeply in scholarly communities and a little bit further removed from the day-to-day action, so to speak. And in business school, the real world interpenetrates the scientists’ world a little bit more, which is I think exciting.

(3:08) Kevin Cool: Thank you. Well, speaking of real problems, that’s a good segue into my next question, which is recently the GSB has embarked on initiative they’re calling Business, Government and Society. Can you just talk a little bit about that? What are the goals and why has that emerged as an emphasis?

Jesper Sørensen: The Business Government Society initiative? I think one way to think about this is if you were to stop somebody in the street and you were going to ask them, what do you think goes on at a business school? I think they would say, well, they’re training people how to maximize profits. That’s what a business school is about, how to make a business, make as much money as possible. And I think for a long time that has been more or less explicitly what business schools have been about. And there’s no doubt that’s a very important part of what we do because profit maximization is one of the most powerful engines society has kind of uncovered for change and for positive change. But actually what happens in a lot of business schools and certainly at the GSB is a little bit different. And so I think if you look at the kinds of people that you have interviewed in the podcast this season and in general on our faculty, what you have are people who are really experts in all facets of human behavior and really are focused on trying to understand how humans work, how societies work, how groups work, et cetera. And that leads to an incredible diversity of implications.

That’s really what feeds into this business, government and society initiative because I think the way we want to think about it is the purpose of a business school is really to make the world a better place, to think about all the complicated ways in which things interact. So how do markets and institutions interact with firms, and how do they change incentives, and how can you learn to balance between the good things that come from being profit-seeking and some of the negative externalities that sometimes go along with them. And I think the Business Government and Society Initiative is kind of a way for us to deepen the school’s ability to speak to this broad range of issues. I think we’ve always been a school that’s super strong in those dimensions, but I think it’s really about accelerating that to a much greater extent.

Kevin Cool: Well, certainly one of the biggest challenges for the world, for society, business, government, everything is climate change. And Professor Bill Barnett was one of our first guests on the show, and he has completely pivoted his research in the direction of sustainability. He’s really an expert on innovation in organizations, and he’s now applying this to sustainability.

How unusual is it for a professor who’s quite veteran, Bill’s been here since the early 1990’s, to make that kind of a switch, and what does that say about the importance of climate change more broadly?

(6:05) Jesper Sørensen: Bill’s pivot over the last couple years is really remarkable, but you’re actually seeing it among a number of our faculty. I think it’s one of the great strengths of the academic system is that you are given such freedom and you’re given the ability to really discover where your talents can best be deployed.

I think what you see with the formation of the Doerr School for Sustainability here at Stanford is really just a blossoming and a focus of interest on campus and people kind of being drawn to this. I think there’s no doubt a lot of our faculty have an individual kind of deeply personal concern for the challenges of climate change. But I think the other part of it is, it’s also intellectually a hugely stimulating kind of topic. The things that you want to challenge as a researcher are the hardest problems. And what could be a more difficult problem than climate change? And really thinking about how one can move society in the right direction in terms of addressing those challenges.

Kevin Cool: We talked to Rebecca Diamond, who’s an economist, and Rebecca uses large data sets. In the study that we talked to her about, she had used social security data to tease out information about foreign born inventors and what sort of impact they had on the US economy, on innovation and so on.

Can you talk a little bit, Jesper, about how either tools to make this data accessible or the data themselves becoming more robust has transformed research?

Jesper Sørensen: Rebecca is a great example of a real transformation that has occurred in Economics in particular over the last couple of decades, which is really a blossoming of what’s called Applied Economics, right? So essentially using empirical data in a very sophisticated kind of way to answer kind of very fundamental questions. And I think what’s really important about this is it’s easy to have ideas, but you also need facts, collect very precise data to get at a set of empirical facts.

In some way, that’s what Rebecca has been doing. She’s essentially being incredibly creative in thinking about how to combine different kinds of data sources being incredibly entrepreneurial in thinking about how to get people to agree, to allow her to combine different kinds of data sources, and then using it in a very sophisticated way to be able to make very precise statements about the contribution of immigrants to patenting behavior and so on and so forth. Anot just their individual contributions, but also to their kind of spillovers onto others.

Again, it’s only when you’re able to really be careful and be precise in that very disciplined controlled way in which great scientists go about doing research, that you’re able to kind of establish a certain set of facts. I think the policy debates around immigration at the high end, kind of a high potential high levels of education, there’s probably more consensus there than there are in other areas of the immigration debate. But nonetheless, it’s super important to be able to know, well, I don’t know that people had a clear sense of what that spillover effect was, so they might be able to say, yes, I can see how hiring or admitting the smartest people from around the world, those people are then going to stay and patent. But I think what’s beautiful about that research is then showing it’s not just that. It’s also that the people they work with become more productive, and it’s in the combination of the two that you get the real benefit.

(9:50) Kevin Cool: Deborah Grunfeld, professor Deborah Grunfeld gave us a fascinating conversation on the dynamics of power, especially as it relates to organizations. And one of her insights was that individuals may not understand or appreciate how much power they actually have. For example, in a situation where they need to call out toxic behavior by a boss, how do insights like that get into the mainstream and become, for lack of a better word, accepted wisdom?

Jesper Sørensen: Through podcasts, like If/Then I would say is certainly one channel, but a lot of this is about, I think what I love about Deb’s research is really about how she connects her insights to people’s own lived experiences,

Kevin Cool: Including her own, including as it turns out.

Jesper Sørensen: One of the challenges of being a great researcher is that you need to move away again from kind of day-to-day reality. In some sense, you need to abstract and you need to simplify. And so it’s a gift, and I think it’s a gift that a lot of our faculty have is to be able to both live in that very abstract kind of world and then make it relatable to somebody who’s not living in that world. So it’s an act of translation. And I think part of what it does is it demystifies things. And I think if you demystify things, you empower people. Then they can start to see, ‘oh, actually not just my gut. That tells me that it might make sense for us all to send in our complaints about the bad boss on the same day. It’s actually backed up by research and there’s science that suggests that I would have success in doing this’, and that instills the level of confidence that I think is really important.

Kevin Cool: Switching gears just a little bit, Mohammad Akbarpour, also an economist, talked to us about an interesting hypothesis that he is exploring, which has to do with the relative value perceived by people in different income levels, a poor person versus in his example Elon Musk.

His premise undergirding his research is that we could make markets more fair if we accounted for that. And one of his examples was using Uber as a sort of case study. If you charged less in poorer neighborhoods and more in more affluent neighborhoods, that would make the market more fair. That does have some, what I would call, political ramifications. Essentially it’s like a redistribution model. And he acknowledged that he had some pushback about that from people. My question is, is there a place for research that essentially is advocating a policy change or a market fix that could also be viewed as a political argument?

Jesper Sørensen: Mohammad podcast is probably my favorite one from this whole season. It was the one that I listened to and it just kind of blew my mind. And so I should preface this by saying I’m not an economist. I’m a sociologist by training. The reason it blew my mind is that he was willing to go somewhere in developing this model that the kind of economic orthodoxy typically does not go. And that’s part of where he is getting the pushback.

The reason it’s relevant that he’s an economist. Now, I’m a sociologist, is one of the reasons people like me become sociologists is because we have more discomfort with the assumptions that he’s challenging. And the fact that he can do it within the confines of the discipline and do it in a way that’s very hard I think to not take seriously, is super powerful. And I think yes, those ideas can be politically controversial, but is that a bad thing? No, because I think what it does is it says the truth that we have discovered is the final truth and what he’s asking us to consider, and let’s be clear, he might be wrong. I think we should all be focused on the possibility. Great ideas initially are often wrong or look wrong, and you have to be willing to take the kind of risk that Mohammad is making to have a great idea.

Hopefully it won’t be wrong because I think there’s some really powerful insights that can be drawn from that in terms of where you want to use redistribution or where you want to not rely on the market and so on and so forth. And I think that is really opening up a set of topics and kind of maybe a can of worms, but that’s good, right? That’s what people should be doing. They should be not just taking everything for granted as if we figured everything out when we wrote down a formula 300 years ago or whenever it was that was written down.

Kevin Cool: So I want to give you here in our last few minutes, is there something about the GSB that I haven’t specifically asked about that you think is important for people to know?

Jesper Sørensen: I think the one thing I would say is it’s incredibly fun. If you listen to the ideas that get mentioned in your podcast, you might agree with them, you might not agree with them, but have fun in that and enjoy it and say, ‘ah, I don’t agree with it, but I never thought about it from this perspective.’ I do think there should be something about research that is also about consumption enjoyment of the process. I think that’s why all of the people who are here keep doing it.

The reason you become a professor at the end of the day is intrinsic motivation. You shouldn’t do it if you’re looking for people to cheer, to give you praise. And it’s not always that financially rewarding of an enterprise, because being an academic is a lot of negative feedback because of the review process and seminars where people are trying to tell you in order to make your paper better, they’re trying to tell you everything that’s wrong with it. So you also have to just have this joy in it. And I think if you’re not a researcher, you could still get that joy without the slings and arrows, and so you could just consume it and say, ‘ah, okay, that’s really cool. Who would’ve thought?’

Kevin Cool: Well, it’s interesting. Mohammad actually was one of those who said he kind of lives in the 5%; 95% of either what you’re pursuing something that turns out to be a dead end or is wrong, or people disagree with it in a massive way. But he said, if there’s that 5% chance that it’s going to make a difference, that’s enough for me.

This was delightful. Great. It was fun. I hope you enjoyed it.

Thank you for listening to our first season of If/Then we invite you to come back to listen to bonus episodes over the next few months as we prepare for season two.

For media inquiries, visit the Newsroom .

Explore More

12 of our favorite research stories of 2023, changing lives, organizations, the world: dean jon levin of stanford gsb, what does the word “intelligence” really mean, editor’s picks.

Making Great Strategy: Arguing for Organizational Advantage Jesper B. Sørensen Glenn R. Carroll

April 03, 2024 Is Money Really the Best Measure of Value? If we want a more equitable world, then we need to consider the different ways people value money.

March 06, 2024 The Brain Gain: The Impact of Immigration on American Innovation If the United States wants to remain a global hub of innovation, then we need to understand the role of immigrants.

February 20, 2024 So Crazy, It Might Just Work: How Foolishness Feeds Innovation If we want to seriously address the climate crisis, then we need to encourage foolish business ideas.

See the Current DEI Report
Supporting Data
Research & Insights
Share Your Thoughts
Search Fund Primer
Teaching & Curriculum
Affiliated Faculty
Faculty Advisors
Louis W. Foster Resource Center
Defining Social Innovation
Impact Compass
Global Health Innovation Insights
Faculty Affiliates
Student Awards & Certificates
Changemakers
Dean Jonathan Levin
Dean Garth Saloner
Dean Robert Joss
Dean Michael Spence
Dean Robert Jaedicke
Dean Rene McPherson
Dean Arjay Miller
Dean Ernest Arbuckle
Dean Jacob Hugh Jackson
Dean Willard Hotchkiss
Faculty in Memoriam
Stanford GSB Firsts
Class of 2024 Candidates
Certificate & Award Recipients
Dean’s Remarks
Keynote Address
Teaching Approach
Analysis and Measurement of Impact
The Corporate Entrepreneur: Startup in a Grown-Up Enterprise
Data-Driven Impact
Designing Experiments for Impact
Digital Marketing
The Founder’s Right Hand
Marketing for Measurable Change
Product Management
Public Policy Lab: Financial Challenges Facing US Cities
Public Policy Lab: Homelessness in California
Lab Features
Curricular Integration
View From The Top
Formation of New Ventures
Managing Growing Enterprises
Startup Garage
Explore Beyond the Classroom
Stanford Venture Studio
Summer Program
Workshops & Events
The Five Lenses of Entrepreneurship
Leadership Labs
Executive Challenge
Arbuckle Leadership Fellows Program
Selection Process
Training Schedule
Time Commitment
Learning Expectations
Post-Training Opportunities
Who Should Apply
Introductory T-Groups
Leadership for Society Program
Certificate
2024 Awardees
2023 Awardees
2022 Awardees
2021 Awardees
2020 Awardees
2019 Awardees
2018 Awardees
Social Management Immersion Fund
Stanford Impact Founder Fellowships
Stanford Impact Leader Prizes
Social Entrepreneurship
Stanford GSB Impact Fund
Economic Development
Energy & Environment
Stanford GSB Residences
Environmental Leadership
Stanford GSB Artwork
A Closer Look
California & the Bay Area
Voices of Stanford GSB
Business & Beneficial Technology
Business & Sustainability
Business & Free Markets
Business, Government, and Society Forum
Get Involved
Second Year
Global Experiences
JD/MBA Joint Degree
MA Education/MBA Joint Degree
MD/MBA Dual Degree
MPP/MBA Joint Degree
MS Computer Science/MBA Joint Degree
MS Electrical Engineering/MBA Joint Degree
MS Environment and Resources (E-IPER)/MBA Joint Degree
Academic Calendar
Clubs & Activities
LGBTQ+ Students
Military Veterans
Minorities & People of Color
Partners & Families
Students with Disabilities
Student Support
Residential Life
Student Voices
MBA Alumni Voices
A Week in the Life
Career Support
Employment Outcomes
Cost of Attendance
Knight-Hennessy Scholars Program
Yellow Ribbon Program
BOLD Fellows Fund
Application Process
Loan Forgiveness
Contact the Financial Aid Office
Evaluation Criteria
GMAT & GRE
English Language Proficiency
Personal Information, Activities & Awards
Professional Experience
Letters of Recommendation
Optional Short Answer Questions
Application Fee
Reapplication
Deferred Enrollment
Joint & Dual Degrees
Entering Class Profile
Event Schedule
Ambassadors
New & Noteworthy
Ask a Question
See Why Stanford MSx
Is MSx Right for You?
MSx Stories
Leadership Development
How You Will Learn
Admission Events
Personal Information
GMAT, GRE & EA
English Proficiency Tests
Career Change
Career Advancement
Daycare, Schools & Camps
U.S. Citizens and Permanent Residents
Requirements
Requirements: Behavioral
Requirements: Quantitative
Requirements: Macro
Requirements: Micro
Annual Evaluations
Field Examination
Research Activities
Research Papers
Dissertation
Oral Examination
Current Students
Education & CV
International Applicants
Statement of Purpose
Reapplicants
Application Fee Waiver
Deadline & Decisions
Job Market Candidates
Academic Placements
Stay in Touch
Faculty Mentors
Current Fellows
Standard Track
Fellowship & Benefits
Group Enrollment
Program Formats
Developing a Program
Diversity & Inclusion
Strategic Transformation
Program Experience
Contact Client Services
Campus Experience
Live Online Experience
Silicon Valley & Bay Area
Digital Credentials
Faculty Spotlights
Participant Spotlights
Eligibility
International Participants
Stanford Ignite
Frequently Asked Questions
Operations, Information & Technology
Organizational Behavior
Political Economy
Classical Liberalism
The Eddie Lunch
Accounting Summer Camp
California Econometrics Conference
California Quantitative Marketing PhD Conference
California School Conference
China India Insights Conference
Homo economicus, Evolving
Political Economics (2023–24)
Scaling Geologic Storage of CO2 (2023–24)
A Resilient Pacific: Building Connections, Envisioning Solutions
Adaptation and Innovation
Changing Climate
Civil Society
Climate Impact Summit
Climate Science
Corporate Carbon Disclosures
Earth’s Seafloor
Environmental Justice
Operations and Information Technology
Organizations
Sustainability Reporting and Control
Taking the Pulse of the Planet
Urban Infrastructure
Watershed Restoration
Junior Faculty Workshop on Financial Regulation and Banking
Ken Singleton Celebration
Marketing Camp
Quantitative Marketing PhD Alumni Conference
Presentations
Theory and Inference in Accounting Research
Stanford Closer Look Series
Quick Guides
Core Concepts
Journal Articles
Glossary of Terms
Faculty & Staff
Researchers & Students
Research Approach
Charitable Giving
Financial Health
Government Services
Workers & Careers
Short Course
Adaptive & Iterative Experimentation
Incentive Design
Social Sciences & Behavioral Nudges
Bandit Experiment Application
Conferences & Events
Reading Materials
Energy Entrepreneurship
Faculty & Affiliates
SOLE Report
Responsible Supply Chains
Current Study Usage
Pre-Registration Information
Participate in a Study
Founding Donors
Location Information
Participant Profile
Network Membership
Program Impact
Collaborators
Entrepreneur Profiles
Company Spotlights
Seed Transformation Network
Responsibilities
Current Coaches
How to Apply
Meet the Consultants
Meet the Interns
Intern Profiles
Collaborate
Research Library
News & Insights
Program Contacts
Databases & Datasets
Research Guides
Consultations
Research Workshops
Career Research
Research Data Services
Course Reserves
Course Research Guides
Material Loan Periods
Fines & Other Charges
Document Delivery
Interlibrary Loan
Equipment Checkout
Print & Scan
MBA & MSx Students
PhD Students
Other Stanford Students
Faculty Assistants
Research Assistants
Stanford GSB Alumni
Telling Our Story
Staff Directory
Site Registration
Alumni Directory
Alumni Email
Privacy Settings & My Profile
Success Stories
The Story of Circles
Support Women’s Circles
Stanford Women on Boards Initiative
Alumnae Spotlights
Insights & Research
Industry & Professional
Entrepreneurial Commitment Group
Recent Alumni
Half-Century Club
Fall Reunions
Spring Reunions
MBA 25th Reunion
Half-Century Club Reunion
Faculty Lectures
Ernest C. Arbuckle Award
Alison Elliott Exceptional Achievement Award
ENCORE Award
Excellence in Leadership Award
John W. Gardner Volunteer Leadership Award
Robert K. Jaedicke Faculty Award
Jack McDonald Military Service Appreciation Award
Jerry I. Porras Latino Leadership Award
Tapestry Award
Student & Alumni Events
Executive Recruiters
Interviewing
Land the Perfect Job with LinkedIn
Negotiating
Elevator Pitch
Email Best Practices
Resumes & Cover Letters
Self-Assessment
Whitney Birdwell Ball
Margaret Brooks
Bryn Panee Burkhart
Margaret Chan
Ricki Frankel
Peter Gandolfo
Cindy W. Greig
Natalie Guillen
Carly Janson
Sloan Klein
Sherri Appel Lassila
Stuart Meyer
Tanisha Parrish
Virginia Roberson
Philippe Taieb
Michael Takagawa
Terra Winston
Johanna Wise
Debbie Wolter
Rebecca Zucker
Complimentary Coaching
Changing Careers
Work-Life Integration
Career Breaks
Flexible Work
Encore Careers
Join a Board
D&B Hoovers
Data Axle (ReferenceUSA)
EBSCO Business Source
Global Newsstream
Market Share Reporter
ProQuest One Business
RKMA Market Research Handbook Series
Student Clubs
Entrepreneurial Students
Stanford GSB Trust
Alumni Community
How to Volunteer
Springboard Sessions
Consulting Projects
2020 – 2029
2010 – 2019
2000 – 2009
1990 – 1999
1980 – 1989
1970 – 1979
1960 – 1969
1950 – 1959
1940 – 1949
Service Areas
ACT History
ACT Awards Celebration
ACT Governance Structure
Building Leadership for ACT
Individual Leadership Positions
Leadership Role Overview
Purpose of the ACT Management Board
Contact ACT
Business & Nonprofit Communities
Reunion Volunteers
Ways to Give
Fiscal Year Report
Business School Fund Leadership Council
Planned Giving Options
Planned Giving Benefits
Planned Gifts and Reunions
Legacy Partners
Giving News & Stories
Giving Deadlines
Development Staff
Submit Class Notes
Class Secretaries
Board of Directors
Health Care
Sustainability
Class Takeaways
All Else Equal: Making Better Decisions
If/Then: Business, Leadership, Society
Grit & Growth
Think Fast, Talk Smart
Spring 2022
Spring 2021
Autumn 2020
Summer 2020
Winter 2020
In the Media
For Journalists
DCI Fellows
Other Auditors
Academic Calendar & Deadlines
Course Materials
Entrepreneurial Resources
Campus Drive Grove
Campus Drive Lawn
CEMEX Auditorium
King Community Court
Seawell Family Boardroom
Stanford GSB Bowl
Stanford Investors Common
Town Square
Vidalakis Courtyard
Vidalakis Dining Hall
Catering Services
Policies & Guidelines
Reservations
Contact Faculty Recruiting
Lecturer Positions
Postdoctoral Positions
Accommodations
CMC-Managed Interviews
Recruiter-Managed Interviews
Virtual Interviews
Campus & Virtual
Search for Candidates
Think Globally
Recruiting Calendar
Recruiting Policies
Full-Time Employment
Summer Employment
Entrepreneurial Summer Program
Global Management Immersion Experience
Social-Purpose Summer Internships
Process Overview
Project Types
Client Eligibility Criteria
Client Screening
ACT Leadership
Social Innovation & Nonprofit Management Resources
Develop Your Organization’s Talent
Centers & Initiatives
Student Fellowships

[email protected]
+1 646 475 7865
REQUEST FOR CALL BACK

Nature, Scope, and Significance of Business Research

Business research is a systematic process of collecting, analyzing, and interpreting data to solve business problems and make strategic decisions. It serves various fields such as market research, financial analysis, consumer behavior, and competitive analysis. The primary goal of business research is to provide actionable insights that can help businesses improve their performance, identify opportunities, and reduce risks. In this blog, we will explore the scope and methodology of business research, and how it benefits both local and global businesses. Finally, we will highlight why Insights Opinion is one of the big market research firms .

What is Business Research

Business research is like being a detective for your business. Here is what it usually involves:

Finding Information: This is about collecting all sorts of details. Look at how many things you sell, what your customers think, or what similar businesses do. It is like gathering clues – you could check your own sales records, ask customers for feedback, or read reports about your industry.
Understanding the Information: Once you have all this information, you must figure out what it tells you. For example, you might see that people buy more from you at certain times of the year or that they like one of your products more than others.
Telling Others What You Found: After figuring things out, you need to explain it to the people who make decisions in your business. This could be through writing a report, giving a presentation, or having a chat about your findings.

Benefits of Business Research

By understanding market trends, customer behavior, and other critical factors, businesses can make better decisions, optimize their strategies, and achieve their goals. Here are some major benefits of business research :

Informed Decision Making: Business research provides accurate and reliable data, enabling managers to make well-informed decisions.

Market Understanding: It helps businesses understand market dynamics, customer preferences, and emerging trends.

Risk Reduction: By identifying potential risks and challenges, business research allows companies to take proactive measures.

Competitive Advantage: Businesses can gain a competitive edge by understanding their competitors’ strengths and weaknesses.

Strategic Planning: Research insights help in formulating effective strategies and long-term plans .

Scope of Business Research

The scope of research is vast and includes various aspects of a business. It can be broadly categorized into the following areas:

Market Research: Market research involves collecting and analyzing data about market conditions, customer preferences, and buying behaviors. It helps businesses identify new market opportunities , understand customer needs, and develop effective marketing strategies.

Product Research: Product research focuses on evaluating the feasibility, design, and performance of new products or services. It involves testing product concepts, assessing market demand, and gathering customer feedback.

Financial Research: Financial research involves analyzing financial data to evaluate the financial health of a business. It includes budgeting, forecasting, and financial planning to ensure the company’s profitability and sustainability.

Consumer Research: Consumer research aims to understand consumer behavior, preferences, and satisfaction levels. It helps businesses tailor their products and services to meet customer expectations.

Competitive Analysis: Competitive analysis involves studying competitors to understand their strategies, strengths, and weaknesses. It helps businesses develop strategies to gain a competitive advantage.

Operational Research: Operational research focuses on improving business processes and operations. It involves analyzing workflows, identifying inefficiencies, and implementing solutions to enhance productivity.

Business Research Methodology

The business research methodology involves a systematic process that includes several key steps:

Problem Identification: The first step in business research is identifying the problem or issue that needs to be addressed. This involves defining the research objectives and determining the scope of the study.

Research Design: In this step, researchers develop a plan or framework for conducting the research. This includes selecting the research method (qualitative or quantitative), determining the sample size, and choosing data collection techniques.

Data Collection: Data collection involves gathering relevant information from various sources. This can be done through surveys, interviews, focus groups, observation, and secondary data sources such as company records and industry reports.

Data Analysis: Once the data is collected, it is analyzed using statistical tools and techniques.: This step involves organizing the data, identifying patterns, and interpreting the results.

Reporting and Presentation: The final step is presenting the research findings in a clear and concise manner. This includes preparing reports, charts, and presentations that summarize the key insights and recommendations .

Business Research for Local and Global Businesses

Business research is essential for both local and global businesses. It helps them understand their respective markets and make informed decisions.

Local Businesses: For local businesses, research focuses on understanding the local market dynamics, customer preferences, and competitive landscape. This includes analyzing local trends, conducting surveys, and gathering feedback from customers.

Global Businesses: For global businesses, research involves a more extensive analysis of international markets. This includes studying global trends, understanding cultural differences, and evaluating the economic and political environment in different countries.

Why Choose Insights Opinion for Business Research

Insights Opinion is a big market research company that offers comprehensive business research services. Whether you are a local business looking to understand your market better or a global enterprise seeking to expand into new territories, Insights Opinion provides the expertise and resources you need. Our team of experienced researchers uses advanced methodologies to deliver actionable insights that drive business growth. Choose Insights Opinion for your business research needs and make data-driven decisions that propel your business forward. Trust us to provide the best market research services and help you achieve your business objectives.

What is business research?

Ans. Business research involves gathering, analyzing, and interpreting data to solve business problems and make informed decisions.

What are the main benefits of business research?

Ans. Business research helps in making informed decisions, understanding market trends, reducing risks, gaining competitive advantage, and planning effective strategies.

How is business research conducted?

Ans. Business research is conducted through a systematic process that includes problem identification, research design, data collection, data analysis, and reporting.

Can business research help both local and global businesses?

Ans. Yes, business research helps local businesses understand their market and global businesses analyze international trends and cultural differences for better decision-making.

Tags Big Market Research Company , importance of business research , market research company in India , scope of business research

Team Insights

Quantitative Research
Qualitative Research
Global Panel
Mystery Shopping
Survey Audit
Programming & Hosting
Translation
Data Processing & Analytics
Online Community Building

Request for call back

Summer is here, and so is the sale. Get a yearly plan with up to 65% off today! 🌴🌞

Form Builder
Survey Maker
AI Form Generator
AI Survey Tool
AI Quiz Maker
Store Builder
WordPress Plugin

HubSpot CRM

Google Sheets

Google Analytics

Microsoft Excel

Popular Forms
Job Application Form Template
Rental Application Form Template
Hotel Accommodation Form Template
Online Registration Form Template
Employment Application Form Template
Application Forms
Booking Forms
Consent Forms
Contact Forms
Donation Forms
Customer Satisfaction Surveys
Employee Satisfaction Surveys
Evaluation Surveys
Feedback Surveys
Market Research Surveys
Personality Quiz Template
Geography Quiz Template
Math Quiz Template
Science Quiz Template
Vocabulary Quiz Template

Try without registration Quick Start

Read engaging stories, how-to guides, learn about forms.app features.

Inspirational ready-to-use templates for getting started fast and powerful.

Spot-on guides on how to use forms.app and make the most out of it.

See the technical measures we take and learn how we keep your data safe and secure.

Integrations
Help Center
Sign In Sign Up Free
What is Business Research: Methods, Types & Examples

What is Business Research: Methods, Types & Examples

Defne Çobanoğlu

Every business owner wants their company always to be successful and profitable. And even if you have a successful business plan, that does not mean things will not need changing in the future. And trial and error may not be on the table when you can not afford to lose money and precious customers. Therefore, you need to be cautious before taking any steps and do your research .

In this article, we explained business research, its methods, and types to help business owners and inform those interested to know more. We also added some examples of scenarios any company may face. Let us get started with the definition of business research!

What is business research?

Business research is a type of research process where the main goal is to help a company thrive and collect data about the target audience, potential business plans, and marketing strategies . The data collection about possible risks and investment opportunities helps business owners make informed decisions about future plans.

The fields that can use business research include marketing, business, education, and social science . But of course, they are not the only ones that can benefit from business research. It is a helpful research type for all business needs. Now, let us see how we can further categorize this into methods and types of business research.

Methods and types of business research

Business research methods and types

In business research methodology, there are two main types. These are quantitative research and qualitative research. In the simplest terms, quantitative research is about collecting numerical and factual data, whereas qualitative research is about collecting data by using open-ended questions . These two methods can be divided into more specific parts. Let us get started with quantitative research methods.

A. Quantitative Research Methods

Quantitative research methods give the researchers factual and numerical evidence that can be effectively used in decision-making processes. There are numerous ways to collect quantitative data, and it is also possible to use more than one method to prove the credibility of the information. Let us start with the first one:

1. Survey research

Surveys are a great way to collect information from a targeted group, no matter how big or small. They can be done in the format of an online survey, phone survey or questionnaire . Surveys are usually close-ended or multiple-choice questions that are easy to group and analyze. The business doing the research can collect valuable information directly from its customers.

2. Correlational research

Correlational research focuses on the discovery of whether two different entities influence each other in any way. The main focus of this research method is not to make decisions. But rather, they can use the findings to explore further using other research methods.

3. Causal-comparative research

Causal-comparative research is similar to correlational research in that both of them compare two different elements and how they affect each other. But the main difference is that fact the focus of this research method is to draw conclusions on the cause-and-effect relationship of said entities.

4. Experimental research

Experimental research has a broad spectrum when it comes to what is taken as ‘experimental’. Basically, it is when businesses want to test a specific theory about the quality of a product or service. There are many methods that can be used, and it is decided by the researcher according to the theory that will be tested.

5. Literature research

Literature research is a very effective and economical research method to use. It is about using offline and online existing literature and going through them to analyze the data. It is mostly used in sales about consumer behaviors.

B. Qualitative Research Methods

Qualitative research is not about numbers like quantitative research. Instead, it is about emotions, opinions, and approaches. The target audience can be presented with a topic through open-ended questions. There is more than one method to go with, and it is even possible to use multiple methods at once. Let us see qualitative research methods:

1. Interviews

The interview method is mostly done on a smaller participant group about a specific subject. They consist of open-ended questions and can be in a structured or unstructured format. Interviews are one-on-one questions asked to the target audience to gain insight into the problem .

2. Focus Groups

A focus group is a pre-determined group of individuals who are chosen to participate in a study to answer specific questions. The researchers present them with a topic and encourage discussions with open-ended questions . Then, the findings are generalized to make decisions.

3. Ethnographic Research

Ethnographic research is similar to conceptual research, and its main focus is to understand the culture and people of the target audience by using observation . This method is done by observing the people in their natural environment and seeing how they interact with one another and their surroundings.

4. Case Study

Businesses generally use a case study method to showcase to potential consumers how their product or service helped a certain individual or a group . It is a good way to attract new customers. This method helps highlight the company’s skill sets and assets.

5. Website visitor research

This research method is relatively newer than others. Its main focus is to collect feedback from individuals who use the company website and ask them about their opinions. A business can use this method by presenting a customer with a quick survey after their purchase on the website . Afterward, the company can improve user satisfaction by fixing existing problems.

Importance of business research

The reasons for conducting business research

Businesses grow by knowing their target market, potential customers, and competitors. And this is only possible by conducting market research to help make informed business decisions. The main goal of business research is to help stakeholders of the company make planned and informed decisions using the facts in the business research report. However, there are other reasons why business research is important. These are:

Gathering information on customers: A business research report provides data on consumers’ behavioral changes, their needs, preferences, and expectations. The managers and stakeholders can make informed decisions with this knowledge.
Performance evaluation: Research allows businesses to evaluate their success against industry standards and other competitors. This helps keep track while deciding how to differentiate themselves from others.
Market expansion: Business research topics include areas that were not explored before. Therefore, when the business wants to expand to new markets, the research provides information on the market’s dynamics and potential risks and profits .
Efficiency and cost-reduction: The data collected by business research helps identify any obstacles to productivity and cost excessiveness. That way, a more cost-effective and efficient approach can be taken.
Business research examples

Business research helps business managers make smart plans for the company and its future. They can make informed decisions about new marketing strategies, building new products or service branches, or improving customer satisfaction .

Business research example #1

Imagine a company making energy drinks wants to know if they can expand their market to the older part of the population. They do not know if they will be interested in their product or what kind of marketing strategies they can use to attract older people’s attention. They can make up a focus group and ask them about their opinions. The company can also conduct literature research to find out information about the competitors .

Business research example #2

Imagine a company that has a clothing store website wants to know if there is anything that makes shopping on their website difficult for customers. They can show a pop-up customer satisfaction survey and ask them if they can find what they are looking for easily and how the website visiting experience was. Then, they can collect customer feedback and see how they can improve their website to enhance customer satisfaction levels.

Frequently asked questions about business research

What are the 4 stages of business research?

Much like every other research, business research is also best done when it is preplanned and organized. And there is a 4 stage plan of business research. These are:

1 - Defining the problem

2 - Designing the research plan

3 - Collecting data and making an analysis

4 - Reporting on the findings

What is the purpose of business research?

The purpose of business research is to make sense of the existing elements of a business, such as consumers, product placement, marketing, innovation, etc . And using the data collected on these elements to make informed decisions and create smart business strategies to improve the success of the company.

When to use business research?

Business research is best used when a new approach is taken or a new product is launched, and the risks need to be assessed. It is essential to be mindful of all the negative and positive sides of a new strategy without risking the entirety of the company.

Final words

When you own a business, no matter how big or small, change can be intimidating. You can not go to new territories blindly. But, you can not stay the same either. In order to keep your existing customers and find new potential ones, you should be mindful of their habits and opinions. The best way of doing this is either to ask them directly ( using a survey, interviewing them, etc .) or to do your own research to draw conclusions.

In this article, we explained business research, quantitative and qualitative research methods, and business research types. We also included some examples of business research and what methods can be used for those problems. If you want to do your own business research but do not know where to start, you can check out quantitative research questions to get you started. Also, do not forget to check out other articles on research and so much more!

Defne is a content writer at forms.app. She is also a translator specializing in literary translation. Defne loves reading, writing, and translating professionally and as a hobby. Her expertise lies in survey research, research methodologies, content writing, and translation.

Market Research
Form Features
Data Collection

15 SaaS customer survey questions you must ask

Ayşegül Nacu

21 ice breaker questions for your polls and surveys

3 vital reasons to build HTML forms for your website

forms.app Team

Business Research: It’s Meaning, Process and Objectives

Meaning of business research.

Business research is the process of studying a company’s competitors, stakeholders, and profit & loss to meet the company objectives and maximize revenue & profits.

The research should be unbiased and factual as they form the basis for further analysis.

Thus, business research is purely the collection and interpretation of external as well as internal data for a company’s better performance.

Objectives of Business Research

Understanding customer requirements, defining stakeholders.

Business research helps to differentiate between potential and non-potential customers. This way the company can quantify its market reach and conduct surveys amongst some of its customers related to their tastes and type. This will help them gain feedback from their customers which they can add back as features in their products!

Pain & Gain Points

Rival study.

The strength of a company is a threat to its competitor and the weakness of a company is the opportunity of its competitor. Therefore, the company should analyze its threats i.e., make an in-depth study of its competitors and, thus brainstorm different ways in which it can convert its threats into opportunities.

Scope of Business Research

Moreover, the scope of business research is not only restricted to the product market. It also plays a crucial role in personnel management and workforce development. Research made for employee motivation, grooming, training, and promotion inculcates more coordination in the organization and also nurtures productivity amongst employees.

Nature of Business Research

Process of business research, identification of challenge.

The first and foremost task of every research is to set an objective by defining what are the prevalent problems in the marketplace and how a company can tackle them.

Creating Research Proposal

Execution of research.

Once the plan is made and the research proposal is developed, the company can toss alternative ways they can execute the research. The company can forward with research by random sampling (mass media survey) or can rely on previously collected data too.

Interpretation of Data

Action plan, related posts:, add commercemates to your homescreen.

Importance of research in business

August 18, 2021

Ever heard of the toy company LEGO? Did you know that this renowned brand was geared towards boys for decades, so much that only 9% of their primary users were female? The company took to sending out researchers to conduct a four-year study involving over 3,500 girls, focusing on their playing habits, and gathering feedback to better understand how to increase the percentage of female users.

With results from the intensive research process, the team worked on a new line of toys involving vibrant colours, additional figurines, and manufactured them in a larger size to cater as an add-on to kids’ accessories. The line, “Friends”, first launched in 2012, has since been a hit with girls and continues to have an inclining market share in construction toys. In addition, research firm NPD Group found that the value of girls’ construction toys tripled to a whopping $900 million in 2014, showing a significant difference from three years prior. This is evident that the direction taken by LEGO in conducting in-depth research has propelled them to remarkable heights and is a building block for their success.

What is Research defined as?

It is acquiring details in all aspects of the business, then using scientific methods to break the information down. Results from the findings would then be distributed through various mediums, such as reports, presentations, and strategic initiatives. Often, research is done in many forms and conducted internally or by an external consultant or firm.

Research is further defined as the capture of accurate data through a systematic approach, using actual observations to deduce real-time data. Generally, the goal is to understand which direction to pump funds into for better sales, profits, and market share.

Types of Research methods:

Qualitative

Think of it as getting coffee with somebody for the first time, where you ask questions to find out more about their hobbies and interests. This method involves structuring open-ended questions in a way where a precise conclusion can be drawn. The goals of this are to get in-depth knowledge about the subjects of the research and to better understand the beliefs of the responders through their behaviour and response.

Data of this research method is collected through the following:

● In-depth Interviews

● Case Study Research

● Focus Groups

● Ethnographic Research

Quantitative

It aims to test theories by objectively collecting and analyzing numerical and statistical data to predict variables of interest. The main goal of it is to test a theory and hypothesis for it to be confirmed. An example is coming up with a questionnaire to understand the percentage of people who play sports on a weekly basis.

This research method includes:

● Experiments

● Numerical Observations

● Closed-ended Surveys

While the approaches provide a vast difference in insights and perspectives, many companies engage in the combination of both to attain the most vital information. This enables them to work smarter in delivering benefits, comparing results, as well as gain deeper insights.

Why is Research important?

Builds credibility

Customers should not be purchasing products with the benefit of the doubt. Having sufficient facts from valuable data provides a solid foundation for findings and leaves them with lesser room for contemplation.

Provides a clear breakdown of what you are up against

With evolving competition all around, there is no guarantee for a business to remain at the peak of its lifespan. One framework used is the SWOT Analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) to first evaluate a company’s competitive position to move ahead strategically.

Helps to narrow your scope

It identifies the most unique themes to provide a working direction to go in. This helps in decision making when you want to dive into the specifics, such as the target audience and goal-setting. Doing so helps businesses to understand the supply and demand of the market, helping them reduce costs on what may not be as necessary.

Provides the latest information and updates

Change happens constantly and it is important to keep up with trends. Having research set in place keeps the business well-informed to relay the best information and meet customer demands.

Retains and introduces customers

To keep a business alive, knowledge of key demographics is important in creating a product or driving it in a certain direction. This data obtained will help the businesses to better understand the brand value and measure customer satisfaction. This piques interest from early adopters and strengthens customer loyalty.

Impact of insufficient research

Without sufficient research done, businesses stand a big chance in missing market opportunities and may face a decline in success rates. They may also place emphasis on the wrong aspects, throwing away meaningful time and resources. Coors, the company behind Coors Rocky Mountain Sparkling Water , is one such example.

Coors originated as a beer company and was known particularly for their alcoholic products prior to expanding into water products. Wanting to go big and ramp up sales of the newly-launched sparkling water product with their mature market presence, they decided to distinctively slap the company’s name and logo on it, selling it under the same line as its beer beverages. Unfortunately, this did not sit right with its consumers as they did not see it as just a bottled water product, but instead, an infusion of water and beer altogether.

This led to failure in sales as customers placed their trust in the already big names in the bottled water industry, leaving no room to consider Coors’ launch. The mistake is still referred to by many businesses as “one of the biggest flops”, simply because they did not do the necessary amount of research to better understand their consumer base. Additionally, they did not reflect on customer satisfaction, moving ahead with it and only discontinuing the line many years later.

The main reason for such research is to help businesses grow in terms of revenue, market share and brand value. A lack of it would lead to inadequate information and unreliable findings, thus resulting in poor decisions made. Based on the success of LEGO and failure of Coors, it is evident that research is of utmost importance when driving a business to higher growth and avoiding mistakes in the process.

Ravenry is an on-demand platform that connects you with Asia’s top 5% of writers, analysts, and consultants within 24 hours, so you can save on all that interview time. A strict vetting process is also of top priority, so you can be certain to get matched with only talents of the best quality, catered to the productivity needs of your business.

How businesses can boost productivity

Business growth is vital in every aspect if a company wishes to drive more sales and rake in higher revenue. One way of achieving that is through enhanced productivity, which is important because of the numerous benefits it brings with

The importance of time management to freelancers

Everyone has the same number of hours in a day, but how they utilize each and every minute is entirely up to them. As such, time management is vital to those who want to get the most out of each

How technology is changing the way that freelancers work

The term ‘freelance’ actually dates back to the early 19th century and referred to independent individuals who would sell their skills to others. While the meaning of the word has not changed much even two centuries later, the ways in

250 North Bridge Road Singapore 179101

Block71 @ Ariobimo Sentral Jl HR Rasuna Said Kav 5 Bl X-2 South Jakarta, Indonesia 12950

Subscribe to our newsletter and join thousands of professionals for our latest updates and insights!

Send us your feedback!

Home » Significance of the Study – Examples and Writing Guide

Significance of the Study – Examples and Writing Guide

Table of Contents

Significance of the Study

Definition:

Significance of the study in research refers to the potential importance, relevance, or impact of the research findings. It outlines how the research contributes to the existing body of knowledge, what gaps it fills, or what new understanding it brings to a particular field of study.

In general, the significance of a study can be assessed based on several factors, including:

Originality : The extent to which the study advances existing knowledge or introduces new ideas and perspectives.
Practical relevance: The potential implications of the study for real-world situations, such as improving policy or practice.
Theoretical contribution: The extent to which the study provides new insights or perspectives on theoretical concepts or frameworks.
Methodological rigor : The extent to which the study employs appropriate and robust methods and techniques to generate reliable and valid data.
Social or cultural impact : The potential impact of the study on society, culture, or public perception of a particular issue.

Types of Significance of the Study

The significance of the Study can be divided into the following types:

Theoretical Significance

Theoretical significance refers to the contribution that a study makes to the existing body of theories in a specific field. This could be by confirming, refuting, or adding nuance to a currently accepted theory, or by proposing an entirely new theory.

Practical Significance

Practical significance refers to the direct applicability and usefulness of the research findings in real-world contexts. Studies with practical significance often address real-life problems and offer potential solutions or strategies. For example, a study in the field of public health might identify a new intervention that significantly reduces the spread of a certain disease.

Significance for Future Research

This pertains to the potential of a study to inspire further research. A study might open up new areas of investigation, provide new research methodologies, or propose new hypotheses that need to be tested.

How to Write Significance of the Study

Here’s a guide to writing an effective “Significance of the Study” section in research paper, thesis, or dissertation:

Background : Begin by giving some context about your study. This could include a brief introduction to your subject area, the current state of research in the field, and the specific problem or question your study addresses.
Identify the Gap : Demonstrate that there’s a gap in the existing literature or knowledge that needs to be filled, which is where your study comes in. The gap could be a lack of research on a particular topic, differing results in existing studies, or a new problem that has arisen and hasn’t yet been studied.
State the Purpose of Your Study : Clearly state the main objective of your research. You may want to state the purpose as a solution to the problem or gap you’ve previously identified.
Contributes to the existing body of knowledge.
Addresses a significant research gap.
Offers a new or better solution to a problem.
Impacts policy or practice.
Leads to improvements in a particular field or sector.
Identify Beneficiaries : Identify who will benefit from your study. This could include other researchers, practitioners in your field, policy-makers, communities, businesses, or others. Explain how your findings could be used and by whom.
Future Implications : Discuss the implications of your study for future research. This could involve questions that are left open, new questions that have been raised, or potential future methodologies suggested by your study.

Significance of the Study in Research Paper

The Significance of the Study in a research paper refers to the importance or relevance of the research topic being investigated. It answers the question “Why is this research important?” and highlights the potential contributions and impacts of the study.

The significance of the study can be presented in the introduction or background section of a research paper. It typically includes the following components:

Importance of the research problem: This describes why the research problem is worth investigating and how it relates to existing knowledge and theories.
Potential benefits and implications: This explains the potential contributions and impacts of the research on theory, practice, policy, or society.
Originality and novelty: This highlights how the research adds new insights, approaches, or methods to the existing body of knowledge.
Scope and limitations: This outlines the boundaries and constraints of the research and clarifies what the study will and will not address.

Suppose a researcher is conducting a study on the “Effects of social media use on the mental health of adolescents”.

The significance of the study may be:

“The present study is significant because it addresses a pressing public health issue of the negative impact of social media use on adolescent mental health. Given the widespread use of social media among this age group, understanding the effects of social media on mental health is critical for developing effective prevention and intervention strategies. This study will contribute to the existing literature by examining the moderating factors that may affect the relationship between social media use and mental health outcomes. It will also shed light on the potential benefits and risks of social media use for adolescents and inform the development of evidence-based guidelines for promoting healthy social media use among this population. The limitations of this study include the use of self-reported measures and the cross-sectional design, which precludes causal inference.”

Significance of the Study In Thesis

The significance of the study in a thesis refers to the importance or relevance of the research topic and the potential impact of the study on the field of study or society as a whole. It explains why the research is worth doing and what contribution it will make to existing knowledge.

For example, the significance of a thesis on “Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare” could be:

With the increasing availability of healthcare data and the development of advanced machine learning algorithms, AI has the potential to revolutionize the healthcare industry by improving diagnosis, treatment, and patient outcomes. Therefore, this thesis can contribute to the understanding of how AI can be applied in healthcare and how it can benefit patients and healthcare providers.
AI in healthcare also raises ethical and social issues, such as privacy concerns, bias in algorithms, and the impact on healthcare jobs. By exploring these issues in the thesis, it can provide insights into the potential risks and benefits of AI in healthcare and inform policy decisions.
Finally, the thesis can also advance the field of computer science by developing new AI algorithms or techniques that can be applied to healthcare data, which can have broader applications in other industries or fields of research.

Significance of the Study in Research Proposal

The significance of a study in a research proposal refers to the importance or relevance of the research question, problem, or objective that the study aims to address. It explains why the research is valuable, relevant, and important to the academic or scientific community, policymakers, or society at large. A strong statement of significance can help to persuade the reviewers or funders of the research proposal that the study is worth funding and conducting.

Here is an example of a significance statement in a research proposal:

Title : The Effects of Gamification on Learning Programming: A Comparative Study

Significance Statement:

This proposed study aims to investigate the effects of gamification on learning programming. With the increasing demand for computer science professionals, programming has become a fundamental skill in the computer field. However, learning programming can be challenging, and students may struggle with motivation and engagement. Gamification has emerged as a promising approach to improve students’ engagement and motivation in learning, but its effects on programming education are not yet fully understood. This study is significant because it can provide valuable insights into the potential benefits of gamification in programming education and inform the development of effective teaching strategies to enhance students’ learning outcomes and interest in programming.

Examples of Significance of the Study

Here are some examples of the significance of a study that indicates how you can write this into your research paper according to your research topic:

Research on an Improved Water Filtration System : This study has the potential to impact millions of people living in water-scarce regions or those with limited access to clean water. A more efficient and affordable water filtration system can reduce water-borne diseases and improve the overall health of communities, enabling them to lead healthier, more productive lives.

Study on the Impact of Remote Work on Employee Productivity : Given the shift towards remote work due to recent events such as the COVID-19 pandemic, this study is of considerable significance. Findings could help organizations better structure their remote work policies and offer insights on how to maximize employee productivity, wellbeing, and job satisfaction.

Investigation into the Use of Solar Power in Developing Countries : With the world increasingly moving towards renewable energy, this study could provide important data on the feasibility and benefits of implementing solar power solutions in developing countries. This could potentially stimulate economic growth, reduce reliance on non-renewable resources, and contribute to global efforts to combat climate change.

Research on New Learning Strategies in Special Education : This study has the potential to greatly impact the field of special education. By understanding the effectiveness of new learning strategies, educators can improve their curriculum to provide better support for students with learning disabilities, fostering their academic growth and social development.

Examination of Mental Health Support in the Workplace : This study could highlight the impact of mental health initiatives on employee wellbeing and productivity. It could influence organizational policies across industries, promoting the implementation of mental health programs in the workplace, ultimately leading to healthier work environments.

Evaluation of a New Cancer Treatment Method : The significance of this study could be lifesaving. The research could lead to the development of more effective cancer treatments, increasing the survival rate and quality of life for patients worldwide.

When to Write Significance of the Study

The Significance of the Study section is an integral part of a research proposal or a thesis. This section is typically written after the introduction and the literature review. In the research process, the structure typically follows this order:

Title – The name of your research.
Abstract – A brief summary of the entire research.
Introduction – A presentation of the problem your research aims to solve.
Literature Review – A review of existing research on the topic to establish what is already known and where gaps exist.
Significance of the Study – An explanation of why the research matters and its potential impact.

In the Significance of the Study section, you will discuss why your study is important, who it benefits, and how it adds to existing knowledge or practice in your field. This section is your opportunity to convince readers, and potentially funders or supervisors, that your research is valuable and worth undertaking.

Advantages of Significance of the Study

The Significance of the Study section in a research paper has multiple advantages:

Establishes Relevance: This section helps to articulate the importance of your research to your field of study, as well as the wider society, by explicitly stating its relevance. This makes it easier for other researchers, funders, and policymakers to understand why your work is necessary and worth supporting.
Guides the Research: Writing the significance can help you refine your research questions and objectives. This happens as you critically think about why your research is important and how it contributes to your field.
Attracts Funding: If you are seeking funding or support for your research, having a well-written significance of the study section can be key. It helps to convince potential funders of the value of your work.
Opens up Further Research: By stating the significance of the study, you’re also indicating what further research could be carried out in the future, based on your work. This helps to pave the way for future studies and demonstrates that your research is a valuable addition to the field.
Provides Practical Applications: The significance of the study section often outlines how the research can be applied in real-world situations. This can be particularly important in applied sciences, where the practical implications of research are crucial.
Enhances Understanding: This section can help readers understand how your study fits into the broader context of your field, adding value to the existing literature and contributing new knowledge or insights.

Limitations of Significance of the Study

The Significance of the Study section plays an essential role in any research. However, it is not without potential limitations. Here are some that you should be aware of:

Subjectivity: The importance and implications of a study can be subjective and may vary from person to person. What one researcher considers significant might be seen as less critical by others. The assessment of significance often depends on personal judgement, biases, and perspectives.
Predictability of Impact: While you can outline the potential implications of your research in the Significance of the Study section, the actual impact can be unpredictable. Research doesn’t always yield the expected results or have the predicted impact on the field or society.
Difficulty in Measuring: The significance of a study is often qualitative and can be challenging to measure or quantify. You can explain how you think your research will contribute to your field or society, but measuring these outcomes can be complex.
Possibility of Overstatement: Researchers may feel pressured to amplify the potential significance of their study to attract funding or interest. This can lead to overstating the potential benefits or implications, which can harm the credibility of the study if these results are not achieved.
Overshadowing of Limitations: Sometimes, the significance of the study may overshadow the limitations of the research. It is important to balance the potential significance with a thorough discussion of the study’s limitations.
Dependence on Successful Implementation: The significance of the study relies on the successful implementation of the research. If the research process has flaws or unexpected issues arise, the anticipated significance might not be realized.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

Research Methods – Types, Examples and Guide

Data Analysis – Process, Methods and Types

Research Methodology – Types, Examples and...

Scope of the Research – Writing Guide and...

Research Recommendations – Examples and Writing...

Literature Review – Types Writing Guide and...

Get your (Free Forever) Qeryz account NOW! I'll take it!

5 Reasons Why Research is Important in Business

What are the reasons why research is important in business, to better understand your customers, identifies problem areas, beneficial in comparative studies, helps design new business opportunities, minimizes loss.

The utilization of research through a WordPress survey tool is greatly beneficial to the evolution and the further development of a business. By exerting efforts in gathering data through research, a business can observe what parts of their current processes are working well and what needs to be changed. The collection of data can also be used to formulate new types of business opportunities and marketing campaigns, creating a bigger and better business for you.

Read on to learn more about reasons as to why research is important in business.

Marketing research with the use of online surveys can help you quickly and efficiently collect data from a vast group of people. In order to understand who exactly is benefiting from your products and services, you can choose to send out a survey that would ask questions regarding their demographic. Take note of the similarities in the replies in order to find out the consumers that benefit from your services. Doing so can help change up your business to better cater to the right consumers, effectively increasing your customer satisfaction.

These can help turn your business into a more aware one. It can even be a stepping stone to searching for a new consumer market to explore. Another reason as to why research is important is it can help you identify problem areas.

By customizing online survey tools, your business can better observe the points of improvement in each of your departments. If you opt to release a survey meant for the consumers, you can better see what factors of your products and services need to be improved upon. If you release a survey meant for your employees, then you can better see the point of improvement that you can do within your current business processes.

You could create necessary improvements, by identifying problem areas . You may also opt to release surveys every couple of months in order to track the progress of your changes. Besides your own data, you can also compare it to the data from other competitor companies.

In order for you to be a step above your competitors, you need to offer something unique to your consumers. If you observe that their sales are increasing at a relatively faster rate than yours, it may be due to a number of factors . In order to discover what exactly makes their company run more smoothly than yours, you could compare the data that you received from your market research with the growth of your competitors.

Compare your products & services and see what makes theirs more appealing to consumers. Then, adapt to this knowledge by making the necessary changes to your current business practices. These changes can be in the form of designing marketing campaigns or by exploring new business opportunities.

Research can not just help design new business opportunities, but it can help design successful ones. With the help of online surveys, you can easily ask your consumers for other things that they may need help in. If you notice a trend in the desires of your consumers, you can turn this into a good advantage for your company in terms of business opportunities. The release of this product will prove to your consumers that you care for their needs, which will ultimately boost loyalty.

Besides new products, with the help of research , you can even look into tapping new consumer markets. By releasing surveys to new and unexplored target markets for your company, you can discover what works and does not work for them. This way can help you effectively reduce your losses as online surveys are free to create.

By first sending out surveys to consumers, you are saving your company a lot of money. This is because you can already pinpoint the potential issues that could arise before you even launch a new product or service. After making the necessary changes, you can confidently release products that you know consumers will enjoy. In the case of a pre-existing product, you could send out surveys to help you find points of improvement in each one. By catering to the concerns of the consumers, it increases the chance of a product’s success.

Take note of these key reasons as to why research can be extremely beneficial to your business. This can better optimize your business processes as well as your services.

Key Takeaway

As a WordPress survey tool can be customized to better fit the needs of your business, it becomes easier to collect data from a large group of people. This, in turn, gives your business the opportunity to further improve upon current practices throughout multiple components. From sales to manufacturing, and even to employee handling.

Besides this, you can use the data you have learned about your business in order to compare how well you are faring against competitor companies. With this information, you can better improve your products and services to give you a competitive advantage.

Try and incorporate a WordPress survey tool into your business practices in order to get a better viewpoint of the success rate of your company.

Research: Writing a Business Plan Makes Your Startup More Likely to Succeed

Francis J. Greene
Christian Hopp

It’s particularly important if you plan to raise money.

When asked about an opponent’s plan for their impending fight, former world heavyweight champion Mike Tyson once said: “everyone has a plan until they get punched in the mouth.” It is a school of thought now fashionable in entrepreneurship circles. The truth, though, is that we just don’t know if it pays to plan. For every study that shows that it does, another study comes along and says that start-ups should just learn by doing. We wanted to study entrepreneurial planning, but with more context than previous efforts. We found that it pays to plan. Entrepreneurs who write formal plans are 16% more likely to achieve viability than the otherwise identical non-planning entrepreneurs. More than that, we were also able to see what makes people write business plans in the first place.

When asked about an opponent’s plan for their impending fight, former world heavyweight champion Mike Tyson once said: “Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the mouth.”

FG Francis J. Greene is Chair in Entrepreneurship in the University of Edinburgh Business School.
CH Christian Hopp is Chair in Technology Entrepreneurship in the TIME Research Area, the Faculty of Business and Economics, RWTH Aachen University.

Partner Center

Study Demands–Resources Theory: Understanding Student Well-Being in Higher Education

Review Article
Open access
Published: 19 August 2024
Volume 36 , article number 92 , ( 2024 )

Cite this article

You have full access to this open access article

Arnold B. Bakker ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1489-1847 1 , 2 &
Karina Mostert 2

739 Accesses

Explore all metrics

This article reviews the literature on student well-being (burnout and engagement) and their relationships with study demands and resources, student behaviors (proactive and self-undermining study behaviors), and student outcomes in higher education. Building on research that used Job Demands–Resources and Study Demands–Resources models to investigate student well-being, we develop the Study Demands–Resources (SD–R) theory to delineate the various processes, mechanisms, and behaviors involved in student burnout and engagement. Study demands and resources have unique and combined effects on higher education students’ well-being. In addition, students can influence their own well-being and study-related outcomes by either proactively optimizing their study demands and resources or displaying self-undermining behaviors that can adversely affect their study environment. We discuss several avenues for future research, including (a) rigorous tests of SD–R propositions; (b) trait versus state effects in SD–R theory; (c) the impact of the higher education climate and lecturer influence; and (d) an expanded SD–R theory.

Study Demands-Resources Model of Student Engagement and Burnout

How psychological capital is related to academic performance, burnout, and boredom? The mediating role of study engagement

Identifying higher education students’ profiles of academic engagement and burnout and analysing their predictors and outcomes

Explore related subjects.

Artificial Intelligence

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Higher education students are confronted with a range of demands, such as coursework deadlines, group assignments, financial problems, and exams. Such demands necessitate time management, coordination, and focused attention. Over time, study demands require considerable cognitive, emotional, and physical effort, which may drain psychological resources and lead to study anxiety, fatigue, and even burnout (Gusy et al., 2016 ; Madigan & Curran, 2021 ; Salmela-Aro & Upadyaya, 2014 ). However, students may also encounter various resources while studying, including support and constructive feedback from lecturers, social support from family and friends, and development opportunities (Bakker et al., 2015 ). Such resources help students manage their demands, facilitate student engagement (Gusy et al., 2016 ), and guide goal-oriented behaviors. Resources are inherently motivating because they satisfy basic psychological needs, such as the needs for autonomy, relatedness, and competence (Vansteenkiste et al., 2009 ).

To better understand the factors influencing student well-being, educational psychologists have adopted the Job Demands–Resources (JD–R) model (Demerouti et al., 2001 ) that originated in an organizational context. JD–R theory is a comprehensive, well-established, and widely utilized theory to measure and explain well-being in organizational contexts empirically (Bakker, Demerouti, & Sanz-Vergel, 2023 ; Bakker, Hetland, et al., 2023 ; Bakker, Xanthopoulou, & Demerouti, 2023 ), offers insights from both positive and negative well-being perspectives, and integrates various job stress and motivational perspectives (Bakker, Demerouti, & Sanz-Vergel, 2023 ; Demerouti et al., 2001 ). The JD–R model categorizes characteristics of the work environment into demands (facets of work that cost effort and instigate a health impairment process) and resources (facets of work that help cope with demands, give meaning, and fuel a motivational process) (Bakker & Demerouti, 2007 ; Schaufeli & Bakker, 2004 ).

Over the past 15 years, numerous studies have provided evidence that the university environment can similarly be organized into study demands and resources, which evoke parallel health impairment and motivational processes among students (e.g., Calderwood & Gabriel, 2017 ; Cho et al., 2023 ; Clements & Kamau, 2018 ; Salanova et al., 2010 ; Wilson & Sheetz, 2010 ; Wolff et al., 2014 ). Thus, building on the JD–R framework, several scholars have proposed and tested Study Demands–Resources (SD–R) models tailored to the higher education context (e.g., Gusy et al., 2016 ; Jagodics & Szabó, 2023 ; Lesener et al., 2020 ; Martin & Collie, 2022 ; Mokgele & Rothmann, 2014 ; Salmela-Aro et al., 2022 ).

In this position paper, we rely on recent formulations of JD–R theory (Bakker et al., 2014 ; Bakker & Demerouti, 2024 ; Bakker, Demerouti, & Sanz-Vergel, 2023 ; Demerouti & Bakker, 2023 ) to systematically delineate the various processes, mechanisms, and study behaviors (proactive behaviors and self-undermining) associated with student burnout and engagement. We build on and strengthen existing SD–R models and review literature on higher education students’ demands and resources. In addition, we discuss how study demands and resources impact student well-being and achievement and the implications for optimizing the university experience.

Although the experiences of students in the higher education environment are not exactly the same as those of employees, there are several similarities between studying and working. Like employees, students need to engage in organized, structured, and compulsory activities, like attending classes, working on group assignments, and studying for exams. In addition, like work activities, study activities are goal-oriented and evaluated, and have important implications for one’s career (Salanova et al., 2010 ). We align empirical evidence for the Study Demands–Resources (SD–R) model with new developments in JD–R theory that build on and strengthen existing research (Gusy et al., 2016 ; Jagodics & Szabó, 2023 ; Lesener et al., 2020 ; Salmela-Aro et al., 2022 ) and focus on the higher education context, although SD–R theory may also be relevant for other educational contexts (e.g., primary school and high school) (Salmela-Aro & Upadyaya, 2014 ).

We aim to make the following contributions to the educational psychology literature. We systematically integrate JD–R principles and propositions based on the existing student well-being literature and build on and strengthen current SD–R models to inform a sound, holistic SD–R theory for the higher education context. First, we integrate the various causes and consequences of two types of student well-being: burnout and engagement. Second, we explain the roles of study demands and resources. Why, how, and when do study demands result in strain and burnout? What is the function of study resources such as autonomy, recognition, and social support? How do study demands and resources have a combined impact on student well-being? We integrate the buffer and boost hypotheses in SD–R theory. Third, we look at the role of personal resources, such as self-efficacy, optimism, and resiliency. How do such beliefs and cognitions influence student burnout and engagement? We explain how personal resources may result in new study resources, and how personal resources statistically interact with study demands and resources. Fourth, we discuss proactive self-enhancing study behaviors such as study crafting and playful study design, as well as reactive self-undermining behaviors. We describe how these behaviors may result in gain and loss spirals of study events and experiences, respectively. Fifth, we discuss the underlying psychological processes linking study demands and resources and student burnout and engagement to individual and higher education outcomes. Specifically, we show how student burnout and engagement mediate the relationship between antecedents and outcomes. Finally, we make several recommendations for future research and practice.

Study Demands–Resources Theory

An important building block of SD–R theory is that the features of the study environment can be categorized as either a demand or a resource. Following this logic and the findings of previous JD–R and SD–R models, SD–R theory proposes that higher education students’ experiences can be categorized as being demanding or resourceful. Study demands require effort and may, therefore, consume considerable physical, emotional, and cognitive energy and capacity. These demands encompass challenges that facilitate learning (e.g., intricate assignments) as well as hindrances that thwart progress (e.g., ambiguous tasks that create uncertainty) (Salmela-Aro et al., 2022 ). In contrast, study resources play a functional role in helping students achieve their academic goals and are instrumental in helping the student studying, regulating study demands, and motivating students to grow, learn, and progress while studying. These resources frequently comprise multilayered factors that assist students’ learning and engagement (Salmela-Aro et al., 2022 ). In our review, we will examine two distinct processes outlined in JD–R and SD–R models (Demerouti et al., 2001 ; Lesener et al., 2020 ; Salmela-Aro et al., 2022 ; Schaufeli & Bakker, 2004 ): the health impairment process and the motivational process. In the organizational context, these processes have demonstrated notable and disparate negative and positive impacts on well-being. The health impairment process is associated with adverse health outcomes, while the motivational process is linked to positive outcomes (Bakker, Demerouti, & Sanz-Vergel, 2023 ).

A second building block of SD–R theory is student well-being with the opposing states of student burnout and engagement. Here, as with JD–R theory, SD–R theory outlines that students may either feel exhausted and be cynical about their studies or rather the opposite, i.e., feel vigorous and enthusiastic. The third building block concerns student behaviors. SD–R theory proposes that certain study environments trigger reactive and maladaptive study behaviors that can undermine effective studying, whereas other study environments trigger proactive and adaptive study behaviors that facilitate effective studying. The proposed SD–R theory also includes feedback loops and is graphically depicted in Fig. 1 . In what follows, we discuss each of these building blocks in more detail while reviewing the available evidence in the educational literature. We start with discussing student well-being.

The Study Demands–Resources model

Student Well-Being

During the past two decades, student well-being has received considerable attention (for meta-analyses, see Bücker et al., 2018 ; Kaya & Erdem, 2021 ). However, since scholars have used a wide range of student well-being definitions and indicators, it is challenging to get a good overview of the potential predictors and outcomes of student well-being. In the present paper, we focus on two specific types of student well-being: student burnout and student engagement.

Student Burnout

Student burnout refers to feeling exhausted because of study demands, expressing a cynical, detached attitude toward one’s studies, and feeling incompetent as a student (Schaufeli et al., 2002 ). Burned-out students experience chronic mental, emotional, or physical exhaustion due to the many demands they face while studying. They often feel disconnected or cynical about their classes and suffer from reduced academic efficacy, may skip classes, or may not complete assignments. Student burnout has been linked to several unfavorable outcomes, including depressive symptoms (Cheng et al., 2020 ), increased use of substances such as alcohol and cannabis (Allen et al., 2022 ), suicidal ideation (Dyrbye et al., 2008 ), class absenteeism (Seibert et al., 2017 ), and dropping out (Bumbacco & Scharfe, 2023 ). Consequently, burnout is a predictor of impaired academic achievement (Madigan & Curran, 2021 ).

Student Engagement

Student engagement is defined as a positive, fulfilling, study-related psychological state characterized by vigor, dedication, and absorption (Salmela-Aro & Read, 2017 ; Schaufeli et al., 2002 ). Engaged students display mental resilience while studying and perseverance in the face of challenges and difficulties (Finn & Zimmer, 2012 ; Hu, 2010 ). In addition, they exhibit a strong commitment to their studies, experiencing a sense of excitement, enthusiasm, and focus (Pekrun & Linnenbrink-Garcia, 2012 ; Schaufeli et al., 2002 ). Engaged students show active learning behaviors and receive better grades (Bakker et al., 2015 ; Schaufeli et al., 2002 ), and low levels of academic withdrawal (Tuominen-Soini & Salmela-Aro, 2014 ). In addition, student engagement predicts various long-term positive outcomes, such as persistence in educational pathways (Öz & Boyacı, 2021 ) and better job possibilities (Ma & Bennett, 2021 ). Engaged students are also more likely to start an entrepreneurial career (e.g., Liu, Gorgievski, et al., 2023 ). Moreover, both student burnout and engagement are the consequence of a unique combination of study demands and resources, which are discussed next.

Study Demands and Resources

Higher education institutions serve as a transformative space where students develop invaluable skills and can gain life-changing opportunities. Engaging in tertiary education means gaining new experiences, meeting new people, and learning a passion for your subject. On days with lectures and tutorial meetings, there are opportunities to learn new things and have interesting conversations with professors and fellow students. The days students prepare for an exam may demand focused reading, intensive information processing, and dealing with interruptions. Moreover, in some countries, students may encounter various other demands, including transportation problems, limited access to technology, poor housing, unsafe living conditions, financial struggles, and difficulty adjusting to the higher education environment (Haverila et al., 2020 ; Martin et al., 2023 ; Martin & Collie, 2022 ).

Studying is also a social activity. Students may be asked to collaborate with their peers when writing papers, preparing presentations, or creating podcasts — which provides an opportunity for an enjoyable and fulfilling experience. However, collaborating may also mean dealing with interpersonal conflicts, for example, when finding out that a group member engages in social loafing and exerts little effort to contribute to the group task. As a final example, students may enhance their academic experience by participating in extracurricular activities, joining study associations, planning study visits to organizations, or inviting experts to give interesting talks.

Research indicates that students from higher social classes typically have access to more resources such as academic materials, financial support, family assistance, and developmental opportunities than their peers from lower social classes (Munir et al., 2023 ; Van Zyl, 2016 ). These resources may enable them to better navigate and manage their demands and reduce study stress, facilitating engagement and study success. In contrast, students from lower social classes often face a larger range of demands, including academic unpreparedness for higher education, difficulties in commuting to campus, challenges in adapting to new social circles (resulting in lower levels of peer support), and being enrolled in courses that were not their preferred choice (Van Zyl, 2016 ). These demands may intensify the perceived academic workload and stress levels, making it more difficult to succeed.

The activities and events students encounter in their study life seem countless and manifold. Following JD–R theory and previous SD–R models (e.g., Lesener et al., 2020 ; Salmela-Aro et al., 2022 ; Salmela-Aro & Upadyaya, 2014 ), SD–R theory proposes that the characteristics of study life can be distinguished into two categories, namely study demands and resources. We define study demands as all the facets of studying that cost effort and, therefore, expend physical, emotional, and mental energy (cf. Bakker, Demerouti, & Sanz-Vergel, 2023 ). Study demands may manifest in diverse forms, such as a high pace and volume of study work and cognitive challenges (Cilliers et al., 2018 ). Students may also face time constraints (Lesener et al., 2020 ), conflicting deadlines (Martin et al., 2023 ), and learning obstacles (Martin et al., 2021 ).

In contrast, study resources are defined as all the aspects of studying that have motivating potential, can buffer the impact of study demands, and facilitate growth and learning (cf. Demerouti et al., 2001 ; Demerouti & Bakker, 2023 ). Specifically, resources tailored to studying can manifest as study resources (e.g., having competent lecturers, access to books and study materials, study facilitators, and mentors) and university resources (e.g., classrooms, library and computer facilities, good infrastructure, and an atmosphere creating a sense of belonging). Resources specific to studying may include learning support (Martin et al., 2021 ), autonomy and sense of control (Collie et al., 2015 ), family and friend support (Cilliers et al., 2018 ), developmental and growth opportunities (Cilliers et al., 2018 ; Lesener et al., 2020 ), lecturer support (Cilliers et al., 2018 ; Kulikowski et al., 2019 ), and role clarity (Lesener et al., 2020 ) among others.

Proposition 1: Study characteristics can be modeled using two distinctive categories, namely study demands and study resources.

Another central proposition in SD–R theory is that study demands and resources have unique effects on student burnout and engagement. Research on such effects within the work context has provided consistent evidence for two processes: (a) a health impairment process triggered by excessive job demands and (b) a motivational process triggered by job resources (Lesener et al., 2019 ). The health impairment process refers to the impact of demands on physical health complaints through fatigue, anxiety, and other strains. In contrast, the motivational process refers to the impact of resources on creativity and task performance through the experience of engagement (vigor, dedication, absorption) (Bakker, Demerouti, & Sanz-Vergel, 2023 ; Schaufeli & Bakker, 2004 ).

Research among students has also provided evidence for these dual processes. For instance, study demands have been shown to deplete students’ energy levels (Cilliers et al., 2018 ; Jagodics & Szabó, 2023 ) and negatively affect their physical and psychological well-being (Gusy et al., 2016 ; Mokgele & Rothmann, 2014 ). Kaggwa et al. ( 2021 ) recently highlighted that the demands prevalent in the higher education context can potentially lead to burnout symptoms, ultimately resulting in negative student outcomes such as procrastination, decreased life and study satisfaction, and intention to drop out (Turhan et al., 2022 ). Research has also demonstrated a clear link between escalated levels of student burnout and mental health disorders (e.g., depression; Jackson et al., 2016 ) as well as reduced academic performance (Madigan & Curran, 2021 ). Thus, consistent with the health impairment process proposed by JD–R theory (Bakker, Demerouti, & Sanz-Vergel, 2023 ), study demands are de-energizing to students, and lead to health problems and unfavorable study outcomes.

While study demands are positively associated with strain and student burnout, study resources are more clearly positively associated with positive aspects of student well-being, including student engagement (Gusy et al., 2016 ; Robins et al., 2015 ). Indeed, several studies underscore the importance of study resources in shaping student motivation and performance. Resources like support from lecturers and peers have been demonstrated to enhance aspects of student well-being such as life satisfaction and engagement (Mokgele & Rothmann, 2014 ). Bellini et al. ( 2022 ) further suggest that a resourceful study environment facilitates students’ learning goals. When students perceived an abundance of study resources, their engagement and motivation to study were significantly heightened (Liu, Gorgievski, et al., 2023 ).

Bakker et al. ( 2015 ) followed students for three consecutive weeks in which they attended six tutorial group meetings. They found that in the weeks that students had access to more study resources (autonomy, social support, opportunities to learn about new topics, and positive feedback), they were more energized and enthusiastic about their studies (i.e., more engaged). During these weeks, students exhibited increased engagement in tutorial meetings, actively participating in problem-solving brainstorms and posing critical questions. In contrast to study demands, study resources, therefore, have the potential to trigger the motivational process in students (Bakker, Demerouti, & Sanz-Vergel, 2023 ). Lesener et al. ( 2020 ) found support for the health impairment and motivational processes in a sample of 5660 university students. Their findings showed that study demands were positively associated with student burnout and that student burnout mediated the link between study demands and students’ life satisfaction. They also found support for the motivational process, where study resources were positively related to life satisfaction through student engagement.

Proposition 2: Study demands and resources instigate two different processes, a health impairment process, and a motivational process.

The third proposition in SD–R theory is that study demands and resources have a combined impact on student well-being and outcomes. According to Bakker, Demerouti, and Sanz-Vergel ( 2023 ), there are two ways in which demands and resources interact and have an impact on well-being. The buffer hypothesis states that study resources such as social support and constructive feedback alleviate or buffer the positive influence of study demands on strain. Thus, buffer effects refer to the protective role of resources in alleviating the adverse consequences of high study demands. For example, when students face demanding coursework and interpersonal conflicts, certain study resources, such as time control and support from fellow students, can act as buffers to diminish the negative impact on their well-being. Aloia and McTigue ( 2019 ) found evidence for a buffer effect in their study among college students in the USA. Specifically, they found that the impact of study demands (e.g., workload, and pressures to perform) on psychological well-being was weakened when students had access to an abundance of study resources (supportive informational and emotional communication). In addition, research by Naylor ( 2022 ) suggested that a study environment rich in resources (e.g., teacher autonomy support and interesting coursework) can compensate for study demands such as study load and financial stress. They also showed that students who had access to more study resources reported lower levels of burnout, anxiety, and depression in the face of high study demands.

The boost hypothesis states that challenging study demands can amplify or boost the positive impact of study resources on engagement and performance (cf. Bakker et al., 2014 ). Particularly when students are confronted with complex study tasks and deadlines, they will benefit most from lecturer support and constructive feedback. Hospel and Galand ( 2016 ) found evidence for a boost effect by showing that students were more emotionally engaged (e.g., curious, interested, enthusiastic) in the lessons when teachers combined high study demands (i.e., high expectations, strong guidance) with study resources in the form of autonomy and support. When students had numerous opportunities to take initiative and when their perspectives and feelings were well acknowledged, study demands positively influenced positive emotional engagement and negatively influenced negative emotional engagement. However, the demands × resources interaction term showed only marginal, mainly nonsignificant, effects on cognitive and behavioral engagement. We refer to Salmela-Aro et al. ( 2022 ) for a further review of synergistic relationships among study demands and resources in the SD–R model.

Proposition 3: Study demands and resources have a multiplicative, combined impact on student well-being.

The Role of Personal Resources

Personal resources refer to individuals’ beliefs in their ability to control and impact their environment successfully (Hobfoll et al., 2018 ; Xanthopoulou et al., 2009 ). Examples are self-efficacy, optimism, hope, and resiliency (also referred to as psychological capital; Luthans et al., 2013 ). In the organizational context, several studies have demonstrated the importance of personal resources for employee outcomes (e.g., Bakker & Van Wingerden, 2021 ; Knight et al., 2017 ). Moreover, research suggests that individuals who have more personal resources also have access to more environmental resources (e.g., Xanthopoulou et al., 2009 ). These findings suggest that when individuals believe they can influence their environment successfully, they are more likely to gain more environmental resources (e.g., autonomy, social support, feedback), which helps them feel engaged and perform well (Bakker, Demerouti, & Sanz-Vergel, 2023 ).

Over the past decade, research suggests that personal resources are also important for student well-being and learning outcomes. Spanish and Portuguese students who reported many personal resources (optimism, self-efficacy, resilience, hope) were more engaged in their studies and demonstrated a higher grade point average than students with few personal resources (Martínez et al., 2019 ). Similarly, Vietnamese business students with higher personal resources reported greater happiness and higher quality of university life (Tho, 2023 ). Personal resources such as hope and self-efficacy were most important for students who had only limited access to social and organizational resources and vice versa (Junça Silva et al., 2022 ). This suggests that personal resources can compensate for a lack of study resources. Finally, a scoping review of Theron ( 2022 ) showed that personal resources (e.g., self-confidence, self-efficacy) and personal skills (e.g., talent for learning, time management skills) help students navigate challenges, achieving goals, and enhancing their well-being.

Is there any evidence that students with more personal resources also gain more study resources over time? Even though Bakker et al. ( 2015 ) did not test the causal relationship between personal and study resources, they did find that on the days students had access to more personal resources, they reported more study resources, and vice versa. Robayo-Tamayo et al. ( 2020 ) investigated the influence of early-day personal resources on end-of-day student engagement through study resources. They used a 5-day quantitative diary study and showed that on the days students felt more self-efficacious and curious, they mobilized more social support from their professors and peers, increasing their engagement.

Lee et al. ( 2022 ) argued that social support from peers and teachers (study resources) and self-compassion (i.e., being mindful and kind to oneself — a personal resource) would be reciprocally related. Although the design of their study could not test (reversed) causal effects, they did find a positive link between social support and self-compassion. In addition, both resources were positively related to academic engagement and negatively related to academic burnout. Finally, it can be argued that students who believe in themselves and think they have control over their study environment are more likely to proactively ask for resources from others. Indeed, Tho ( 2023 ) showed that students with more personal resources (hope, optimism, self-efficacy, and resilience) were more likely to engage in study crafting, i.e., they took the personal initiative to increase their social and structural study resources.

Proposition 4: Personal resources such as optimism, self-efficacy, hope, and resilience have a reciprocal relationship with study resources.

SD–R theory further proposes that, like study resources, personal resources can moderate the negative impact of study demands on student well-being. In the organizational context, several studies have shown that personal resources alleviate the impact of job demands on well-being (e.g., Bakker & Sanz-Vergel, 2013 ; Demirović Bajrami et al., 2022 ). However, in the context of higher education, most research has focused on mediating effects, with limited literature available that provides evidence for a moderating effect of personal resources.

In one of the few studies available, ‘t Mannetje et al. ( 2021 ) used interviews to explore the personal resources high-achieving honors students rely on to perform well in a demanding academic environment. This study across three Dutch universities showed that several personal resources, including self-direction, inquiry-mindedness, and perseverance, were crucial for achieving academic success and helped students cope with the demands they faced. Further, a recent study by Martin et al. ( 2023 ) investigated the roles of self-perceived adaptability and fluid reasoning, which both can be classified as personal resources in an educational setting. The authors hypothesized that students with higher levels of adaptability and fluid reasoning would be less prone to experiencing the adverse effects of a mandated lockdown, which was considered a study demand. Results showed that fluid reasoning (but not adaptability) buffered the unfavorable effects of the lockdown on self-efficacy. In line with JD–R and SD–R models, a boost effect was also observed, indicating that fluid reasoning was a more important resource with a stronger impact on self-efficacy when the demands were high rather than low (Martin et al., 2023 ).

Proposition 5: Similar to study resources, personal resources moderate the impact of study demands on student well-being.

Proactive Self-Enhancing Study Behaviors Producing Gain Spirals

The previous section has shown that study demands and resources have unique as well as multiplicative effects on student well-being. A critical insight in JD–R theory is that individuals do not merely respond to the characteristics of their environment, but rather may take initiative to actively influence this environment (Bakker, 2017 ; Demerouti & Bakker, 2024 ). Accordingly, engaged individuals are motivated to proactively shape the design of their tasks and social environment. This phenomenon is called crafting — the proactive adjustments individuals make in their tasks and social relationships (Wrzesniewski & Dutton, 2001 ) or more broadly in their demands and resources (Tims & Bakker, 2010 ) to enhance the meaning of their activities and to create a better fit between their personal abilities, preferences, and the situation. Several reviews and meta-analyses have shown that job crafting has a range of positive consequences in the organizational context, including increased engagement, meaningfulness, task performance, and prosocial behavior (Demerouti & Bakker, 2024 ; Lazazzara et al., 2020 ; Rudolph et al., 2017 ). Thus, individuals who proactively increase their challenging demands (e.g., start a new project), reduce their hindrance demands (e.g., reduce workload and negative interactions with others), and/or actively increase their resources (e.g., ask for feedback, seek support) are more likely to feel energized and enthusiastic about their work, and consequently perform better (Demerouti & Bakker, 2024 ), creating a positive and upward spiral.

In SD–R theory, we propose that students may also engage in proactive self-enhancing behaviors (e.g., study crafting), to optimize their study environment, engagement, and performance. They are more likely to do so when they feel well and are enthusiastic about their studies (see Fig. 1 ). By taking the personal initiative to influence their study environment, students can sustain their engagement and create an upward spiral of resources, engagement, and study performance (Llorens et al., 2007 ). Bindl and Parker ( 2011 ) have defined such proactive behavior as “self-initiated, anticipatory action aimed at changing either the situation or oneself.” (p. 567). Examples in the study context include taking the initiative to set clear study goals, proactive problem-solving, and proactively using one’s strengths and improving one’s deficits. Students who proactively build a network during their studies are more likely to approach each other for help when needed, and adapt to university life (Brouwer & Engels, 2022 ). Moreover, students’ characteristics and behaviors influence other students’ academic performance and social outcomes — known as peer effects (Cao et al., 2024 ; Yeung & Nguyen-Hoang, 2016 ).

Recent research has shown that students engage in feedback-seeking behaviors, study crafting, and playful study design and that such behaviors can have favorable consequences for student engagement and outcomes. Using a weekly diary design, Körner et al. ( 2021 ) investigated study crafting among higher education students. Findings showed that weekly study resources (decision latitude, social support from lecturers, and support from fellow students) were positively related to weekly study crafting via weekly student engagement. Thus, study resources fostered energy and enthusiasm in students, which, in turn, made them more likely to proactively increase their study challenges, try to learn new things, and ask lecturers for feedback about their performance.

Tho ( 2023 ) investigated the consequences of study crafting (asking for feedback, taking on extra study tasks) among a large sample of Vietnamese undergraduate business students. Results of this study showed that study crafting was an important determinant of satisfaction with study life, when students believed that they had control over their study environment. Particularly when students’ personal resources (e.g., hope, optimism) were high, study crafting was positively related to indicators of happiness and satisfaction with study life. In a similar vein, Mülder et al. ( 2022 ) conducted a study among almost 3000 German university students and found that study crafting was positively related to well-being. Students who proactively improved their study demands and resources were more engaged with their studies, were less exhausted, and reported higher overall well-being (e.g., quality of life, satisfaction with health and personal relationships).

Luu and Vo ( 2020 ) conducted a study among medical students and their teachers. They used observations and video recordings of medical teachers’ authentic leadership (e.g., observations of self-awareness and relational transparency) and student reports of study crafting. The results showed that teacher authentic leadership was positively related to student crafting behaviors. Thus, when teachers were more authentic, students were more likely to proactively seek study challenges and resources. Postema et al. ( 2022 ) conducted a study among Dutch student-athletes and investigated possible spillover effects of study crafting to the sports domain. Consistent with an enrichment perspective, results showed that on the days students engaged in study crafting (increasing challenges, increasing resources, and cognitive crafting), they experienced higher levels of activated positive affect (e.g., feeling inspired, excited, alert) and increased student engagement. Positive affect also had a spillover effect on the sports domain: students who experienced more positive emotions because of study crafting showed better training performance as evident from self- and coach-ratings.

Körner et al. ( 2023 ) evaluated a study crafting intervention’s effectiveness by randomly assigning students to a training or control group. Study crafting and student engagement and exhaustion were assessed before and after the intervention. Results showed that students learned to optimize their study demands and resources (i.e., study crafting), and this increased their levels of student engagement and decreased their levels of exhaustion.

Liu, Zhang, et al. ( 2023 ) investigated another proactive study behavior called playful study design — a cognitive-behavioral approach to study tasks through which tasks and/or activities are redesigned to be more fun and more challenging (Scharp et al., 2023 ). They used a day reconstruction method and collected data from university students across five consecutive days. The results showed that playful study design fostered the daily experiences of flow and flourishing, particularly under difficult conditions (when students often ruminated about COVID-19). In another study, Wang et al. ( 2023 ) investigated the impact of weekly playful study design on student engagement and goal attainment. This study showed that students were highly engaged and successful in achieving their goals when they redesigned their study tasks to be more playful. For example, by guessing the hypothesized outcomes, segmenting tasks to increase the challenge of studying, or by using cognitive mind maps for summarizing the literature, students increased their own engagement and performed better. The effects were strongest for students who were high (vs. low) in proactive personality — they benefitted most from using playful study design. These findings are consistent with JD–R theory and previous findings in the work context showing that job crafting and playful work design have favorable effects on engagement, creativity, and performance (Bakker, Demerouti, & Sanz-Vergel, 2023 ; Bakker & Scharp, 2024 ; Oprea et al., 2019 ).

Proposition 6: Students proactively optimize their own study demands and resources through study crafting and playful study design.

Proposition 7: Student engagement can instigate a gain spiral of proactive, self-enhancing study behaviors, (study and personal) resources, and optimal study demands.

Reactive Self-Undermining Study Behaviors Producing Loss Spirals

Whereas proactive study behaviors play an important role in the gain spiral of SD–R theory, self-undermining behaviors play an important role in the loss spiral (see Fig. 1 ). Self-undermining refers to certain undesirable behaviors in response to stress, creating obstacles (Bakker & Wang, 2020 ). One example is that a student experiencing strain because of an upcoming exam and accompanying high study demands may feel upset and irritated and creates interpersonal conflicts with other students. Students may also have trouble concentrating and, therefore, create a backlog in their study tasks. Self-undermining behaviors create hindrances or new, additional demands that add up to the demands that already exist (Bakker & Costa, 2014 ).

Widlund et al. ( 2021 ) used an accelerated longitudinal study design to investigate differences in Finnish adolescents’ developmental trajectories of school burnout and engagement and their associations with students’ progression in mathematics performance and educational aspirations. One of the trajectory profiles the authors identified was that of declining academic well-being (low and declining engagement, high and increasing burnout). Students in this group started with high performance and aspirations, but they progressed at a slower rate in mathematics and lowered their aspirations over time. Widlund and her colleagues explained these findings by self-undermining behaviors. They argued that self-undermining may have taken the form of poor communication (cf. Bakker & Wang, 2020 ), which reduced the availability of study resources. Students with elevated stress levels may have fallen behind in their studies, and possibly created conflict with peers and teachers because of their own feelings of irritation and impatience. This, in turn, creates more demands over time (Bakker & Costa, 2014 ).

Previous research has provided evidence for such a loss spiral by revealing a reciprocal relationship between school stress and students’ perceived conflicts with teachers (Kiuru et al., 2020 ). In their weekly diary study among German higher education students, Körner et al. ( 2021 ) found that in the weeks students faced higher study demands (time pressure, overload, complex study tasks), they were more likely to feel emotionally exhausted and consequently more likely to show self-undermining behaviors. Particularly in the weeks students faced complex assignments and needed to process a lot of information, they were drained by their studies and reported a backlog in their study tasks, more mistakes, and poorer communication (i.e., self-undermining). Jia et al. ( 2021 ) conducted a study on self-handicapping among Chinese medical students during the COVID-19 crisis. Self-handicapping shows some conceptual overlap with self-undermining. It refers to the process of finding or creating barriers to achieving successful study performance — with the aim of safeguarding one’s sense of self-competence (Jones & Berglas, 1978 ). The results of this study showed that students who experienced higher levels of academic stress (e.g., nervousness and anxiety for the final exams) were more likely to procrastinate and consequently showed more self-handicapping behaviors (e.g., drinking alcohol and deliberately losing learning materials).

Research has also shown that procrastination is predictive of future stress, through maladaptive coping (Sirois & Kitner, 2015 ). Tice and Baumeister ( 1997 ) assert that procrastination is a self-undermining behavior pattern characterized by short-term benefits (such as rest), but long-term costs (such as exhaustion). Their study examined the occurrence and effects of procrastination on physical symptoms and stress, among a small sample of higher education students. The findings showed that at the beginning of the semester, students who procrastinated reported lower levels of stress and fewer illnesses compared to students who did not procrastinate, indicating short-term benefits. However, toward the end of the term, students who procrastinated reported higher stress levels and more illnesses, as well as lower academic performance. This supports the idea of a loss spiral in which students who show self-undermining behaviors (creating a backlog, avoidance coping) create more stress over time.

A recent study was conducted among a large sample of German university students to investigate the relationship between academic procrastination and learning-related anxiety and hope. The study was conducted with 6-week intervals at the beginning, middle, and end of the academic semester (Gadosey et al., 2023 ). The results showed that academic procrastination at the start of the academic semester predicted learning-related anxiety and low levels of learning-related hope during the middle of the semester, which, in turn, resulted in even more procrastination toward the end of the semester. These findings suggest that higher tendencies to procrastinate could lead to low levels of hope over time and that students may end up in a spiral of more self-undermining behavior. Conversely, the study reports that lower tendencies to procrastinate may lead to increasing levels of hope, which relates to the gain spirals mentioned earlier.

These results are consistent with previous findings in an organizational context. For example, Bakker and Wang ( 2020 ) showed in a series of studies that individuals who were exposed to higher job demands felt more exhausted and were more likely to engage in self-undermining behaviors. Using a weekly diary design, Bakker, Xanthopoulou, and Demerouti ( 2023 ) argued and found that weekly emotional demands and workload were predictive of weekly burnout complaints, and indirectly predictive of self-undermining and dysfunctional coping (avoidance and passive coping). These effects were stronger for individuals who already scored relatively high (vs. low) on chronic burnout at the start of the study. Providing additional evidence for a loss cycle, Roczniewska and Bakker ( 2021 ) found that employees who felt lower on energetic resources at the start of the day were more likely to engage in self-undermining behaviors and less likely to engage in job crafting, which consequently undermined their daily functioning.

Proposition 8: Study demands and strain may lead to reactive, maladaptive self-regulation cognitions and behaviors (self-undermining).

Proposition 9: Study-related strain can instigate a loss spiral of self-undermining and study demands.

Student and Higher Education Outcomes

Study characteristics, like job characteristics, can have an important impact on student burnout and engagement and indirectly influence student and higher education outcomes. Student burnout and engagement are positioned as two central well-being constructs in SD–R theory because of their significant impact on student behaviors as well as student and higher education outcomes (see Fig. 1 ).

Research has shown that demands and resources directly relate to key student outcomes. A study among higher education students found that hindering study demands (e.g., high workload, inadequate comprehension in classes) adversely affected students’ academic achievement (i.e., GPA scores). In contrast, challenging study demands (e.g., perception of the degree of work difficulty in classes) showed a positive relationship with students’ academic achievement and were negatively related to students’ hours of withdrawal or disengagement (Travis et al., 2020 ). Study resources have a positive impact on student outcomes. For instance, resources such as student support (instructional, peer, and technical support) were shown to have a positive impact on students’ satisfaction with their study course (Lee et al., 2011 ), while support from family and friends directly affected students’ academic achievement (Saeed et al., 2023 ).

Research among students has also provided evidence of burnout and engagement’s unique and differential effects on various key outcomes. Such outcomes include, but are not limited to, academic performance (e.g., GPA score) (Schreiber & Yu, 2016 ), life satisfaction (Lesener et al., 2020 ), intention to drop out and satisfaction with studies (Álvarez-Pérez et al., 2021 ; Mostert & Pienaar, 2020 ), psychological well-being (Chaudhry et al., 2024 ), students’ likelihood of being satisfied with the higher education experience, and pursuing postgraduate studies (Öz & Boyacı, 2021 ).

However, the relationship between student burnout, engagement, and student outcomes is not necessarily direct or linear. Rather, it is a result of the dynamic interplay of different factors, influenced by both antecedents and outcomes as outlined in the health impairment and the motivational processes. Öz and Boyacı ( 2021 ) conducted a study to examine the association between student engagement and outcomes. Their findings showed that engagement explained variance in students’ GPA scores and increased the likelihood that students were satisfied with their experience at the university, as well as the likelihood that students pursued a postgraduate degree. This is consistent with the idea that activated positive emotions like energy and enthusiasm encourage active involvement with goal pursuits and with the environment (Lyubomirsky et al., 2005 ).

In addition, various studies have shown that student burnout and engagement can act as mediators between study-related antecedents and outcomes in SD–R theory (cf. Fig. 1 ). For example, a study among part-time employed students (Laughman et al., 2016 ) investigated the relationship between work–school conflict and job outcomes. Their findings showed that work–school conflict predicted work outcomes and that burnout mediated these effects. Similarly, Chaudhry et al. ( 2024 ) provided evidence for the mediating effect of student engagement. Their study among management students investigated the relationship between various types of student support and psychological well-being. Their findings showed that academic engagement partially mediated the relationship between a positive internal team environment, family support, and psychological well-being. Moreover, academic engagement fully mediated the relationship between institutional support and psychological well-being.

Körner et al. ( 2021 ) specifically investigated the mediating role of engagement and exhaustion in the relationship between study characteristics and study crafting and self-undermining behaviors among students. Their findings revealed a positive relationship between study resources and study crafting mediated by engagement, as well as a positive relationship between study demands and self-undermining mediated by exhaustion. Another recent survey among medical students found that students with a high risk of burnout tend to have a lower academic performance rate (Ilić & Ilić, 2023 ). Interestingly, this study also found that students with higher GPAs tended to have a higher risk of burnout — highlighting the intricate dynamics between these relationships.

We conclude that when students feel full of energy and are really enthusiastic about their studies (i.e., engaged), they are able to invest considerable cognitive and energetic resources in their studies. Consistent with this perspective, SD–R theory proposes that engaged students are more likely to be proactive (e.g., engage in study crafting, playful work design, and strengths use) and function better. In contrast, when students feel exhausted and cynical about their studies (i.e., burnout), they do not have the psychological resources to invest effort in their studies. As a consequence, they may start to undermine themselves and enter a loss spiral. This has negative implications for their own performance and for the higher education institution at large. Therefore, using previous SD–R models and theory, we may predict student and higher education outcomes, including academic performance, class attendance, learning activities, active participation, and inclination to drop out (Bakker et al., 2015 ; Loyens et al., 2007 ).

Proposition 10: Study demands and resources are directly related to student and higher education outcomes and indirectly related through the mediation of student burnout and engagement.

Recommendations for Research

Now that we have formulated SD–R theory, it is important to set an agenda for future research. Rigorous testing of the propositions put forward in this article is needed. SD–R theory (graphically depicted in Fig. 1 ) can be used to guide such research. Studies could test health impairment versus motivational processes and investigate whether the two processes are indeed unique and predict different outcomes. For example, SD–R theory predicts that study demands are most predictive of physical health and class absence, whereas study resources are most predictive of grades and university dropout. In addition, research should test statistical interactions between study demands and study resources. Are time pressure, interpersonal conflicts, and complex assignments less stressful if students have access to an abundance of study resources (e.g., support from professors, career opportunities) and personal resources (e.g., optimism, self-efficacy)? Do study resources such as study skills workshops and extracurricular activities particularly have a positive influence on engagement and performance when study challenges are high? Another stream of research may test the loss and gain spirals proposed in SD–R theory (Bakker, Demerouti, & Sanz-Vergel, 2023 ; Bakker, Xanthopoulou, & Demerouti, 2023 ). Are students with burnout complaints more likely to show self-undermining and procrastination, and does this lead to a further increase in study demands? Are students high in engagement more likely to craft their studies and to proactively optimize their demands and resources leading to more engagement? Does a playful approach of study tasks and assignments facilitate persistence and help students deal with daily hindrance demands (e.g., repetitive study tasks, financial uncertainty, higher education bureaucracy)?

It should be noted that various pathways in SD–R theory are reciprocal, implying that scholars can use most variables as predictors and outcomes. Thus, next to using study demands as predictors of strain and self-undermining, study demands could be used as outcomes of strain and self-undermining. Similarly, study resources can be modeled and tested as predictors and outcomes of student engagement and study crafting. In short, testing the basic hypotheses in SD–R theory has just started, and we need a range of new studies to further establish its validity. Studies may apply longitudinal research designs with months or years between the assessments, or “shortitudinal” designs (Dormann & Griffin, 2015 ) with daily or weekly assessments so that causal and reversed causal effects can be modeled. Shortitudinal studies collect data over short periods of time, typically a few days or weeks with frequent assessments conducted daily. They allow examining changes in variables over time and capture short-term fluctuations in student experiences and behaviors. We also need rigorous qualitative research to explore the various study demands and resources students are exposed to and to explore their unique experiences in various higher education settings.

Future research may also extend SD–R theory and explore new avenues. Here, we briefly discuss three possible research directions, namely (a) trait versus state effects in SD–R theory; (b) the impact of the higher education climate and lecturer influence; and (c) an expanded SD–R theory.

Traits Versus States in SD–R Theory

Scholars in educational psychology have typically relied on self-report questionnaires and cross-sectional and longitudinal research designs to investigate student well-being and performance. In these studies, the person is the unit of analysis and the statistical analyses are based on differences between persons (e.g., their personalities, or their typical (“trait-like”) study environment, well-being, and behaviors). An underlying assumption in these studies is that the investigated constructs have some stability over time. However, students’ experiences and behaviors may fluctuate considerably over short periods of time, for example, as a function of daily discussions with peers and professors, participation in group coursework, and engagement in extracurricular activities (Bakker et al., 2015 ; Doerksen et al., 2014 ; Xue et al., 2022 ). Such short-term fluctuations (“states”) can be studied using daily diary designs in which not the person, but the situation is the unit of analysis. Diary studies enable researchers to capture “life as it is lived” (Bolger et al., 2003 , p. 597). For example, with the experience sampling method, students may be asked to fill out a brief questionnaire on their smartphone every time they receive a push message. Alternatively, in a daily diary study, students may be requested to fill out a short online questionnaire at the end of every day during a 1- or 2-week period (see Ohly et al., 2010 ).

In JD–R theory (Bakker, 2015 ; Bakker, Demerouti, & Sanz-Vergel, 2023 ), personality is positioned as a trait-level variable that moderates the loss and gain cycles displayed in Fig. 1 . Thus, the impact of daily demands and resources on well-being and study behaviors, as well as the impact of daily (proactive or reactive) behaviors on demands and resources, is proposed to be different for individuals with different personalities (see, for example, Bakker & Oerlemans, 2016 ). In an educational context, this may mean that students high (vs. low) in extraversion (i.e., likely to make contact with other students and be at the center of attention) benefit more from daily social resources in their study environment (feedback, social support). Such social interactions could result in feeling more engaged while studying. There is some preliminary evidence for the proposition that personality traits moderate daily study processes.

Longua et al. ( 2009 ) used a 30-day diary study to examine the influence of personality on how students responded to combinations of negative and positive daily events (e.g., progress on study tasks, conflicts with friends or family). They found that positive daily events buffered the effect of negative daily events on negative affect (e.g., feeling angry, jittery, nervous) for students low in neuroticism and those high in extraversion, but not for students high in neuroticism or low in extraversion. Positive daily events also buffered the impact of negative daily events on night-time stress, but only for students low in neuroticism. Bakker et al. ( 2015 ) conducted a study among psychology students and found that students’ weekly study resources (e.g., social support, feedback) and personal resources (self-esteem, optimism, self-efficacy) facilitated their student engagement (vigor, dedication, and absorption). Student engagement, in turn, was predictive of observed learning activities during the weekly educational group meetings and contributed significantly to the course grade. Moreover, as hypothesized using a SD–R theoretical perspective, the results showed that the impact of study and personal resources on student engagement was stronger for students high versus low in openness to new experiences. Future research should test other personality factors (e.g., conscientiousness, proactive personality) as cross-level moderators of the impact of daily study demands and resources on student well-being, behaviors, and outcomes.

The Higher Education Climate and Lecturer Influence

The abovementioned research recommendations focus on individual students — their perceptions of study demands and resources, their study behaviors, and their well-being. However, students are part of a system and may also be influenced by their teachers or professors, or by the overall climate of the educational institute where they study. The higher education climate refers to “factors that serve as conditions for learning and that support physical and emotional safety, connection and support, and engagement” (U.S. Department of Education, Office of Safe and Healthy Students, 2016 , p. 1). When students perceive that the climate in their institution is psychologically safe, they have a stronger sense of belonging (Allen et al., 2018 ) and their academic achievements are better (Bear et al., 2011 ). We argue that the higher education climate is predictive of study demands and resources. In institutes with a psychologically safe climate, students can be expected to be exposed to reasonable study demands and have access to sufficient study resources (cf. Dollard & Bakker, 2010 ). New research is needed to test psychosocial safety climate as a higher-level variable that influences the study environment, and indirectly contributes to student well-being and performance.

Research with the JD–R theory has shown that leaders may influence the prevalence of job demands and resources, employee well-being, and employee proactive behaviors (e.g., Thun & Bakker, 2018 ; Tummers & Bakker, 2021 ). When leaders empower their employees and show individual consideration — i.e., supporting their development and providing trust and autonomy — their employees are more likely to take initiative and proactively optimize their own job design. Consequently, employees can feel more engaged and perform better (Bakker, 2022 ). Mirroring these leader–employee effects in a work context, future research in educational contexts could test the impact of professors and lecturers on students. This is a multilevel effect in which the enthusiastic behaviors and engagement of professors are expected to influence study demands and resources, student well-being, and student behaviors. For example, it can be hypothesized that engaged professors will be best able to inspire students, influence their enthusiasm and vigor (i.e., student engagement), and influence their study performance (Bakker, 2005 ; Frenzel et al., 2018 ; Pachler et al., 2019 ). Vujčić et al. ( 2022 ) found that teacher engagement was positively related to student well-being because students were more willing to invest time and energy in study tasks and activities. In addition, teacher engagement will have a positive impact on study resources, because engaged teachers are more willing to help their students — offering support, information, and feedback (cf. Christian et al., 2011 ; Simbula & Guglielmi, 2013 ).

Expanding SD–R Theory

We have identified various opportunities for future research, but there are many more options that we will briefly mention here. First, we have indicated that more research on study demands and resources is needed, but students are also confronted with demands and resources in other life domains, including family, self, and sports, for example. Demerouti and Bakker ( 2023 ) have recently integrated demands and resources from the home and personal domains and argued that demands in one domain can be buffered or boosted by resources from another domain. In a study context, the impact of family and personal demands (e.g., high expectations, perfectionism) on student burnout may, for example, be buffered by study resources (e.g., social support and feedback from lecturers).

Second, future research is needed to explore how SD–R theory relates to or complements other established motivational theories within the educational context. One potential theory to explore is expectancy-value theory, which posits that an individual’s motivation is influenced by the perceived likelihood of success and the value they place on the potential outcome (Wigfield & Eccles, 2000 ). This theory could complement SD–R theory by providing a more nuanced understanding of how the study resource of feedback about study performance (e.g., derived from course grades and other indicators of study success) predicts student engagement. In a similar vein, future research could investigate how principles from goal-setting theory could be integrated into SD–R theory. Goal-setting theory proposes that setting specific, challenging, and attainable goals can enhance an individual’s motivation and performance (Locke & Latham, 2002 ). New research could explore how goal-setting influences students’ ability to manage study demands and proactively use study resources, and how these SD–R strategies indirectly facilitate student engagement. As a final example, it would be interesting to investigate how growth mindset (Dweck, 2006 ; Yeager & Dweck, 2020 ) may qualify the impact of daily or weekly study demands and resources on student engagement and performance. Integrating mindset and SD–R theories, it can be hypothesized that study challenges and resources will have a stronger positive impact on engagement and performance for students with a growth mindset, because they tend to view challenges as opportunities to learn and improve, rather than threats. They invest more effort, proactively try new strategies, and seek resources when needed. Exploring the potential synergies between SD–R theory and other motivational theories in the educational psychology literature could contribute to developing more comprehensive and effective interventions for supporting student well-being.

Third and finally, it would be interesting and important to investigate the role of other proactive behaviors students may use next to study crafting and playful study design, and to integrate these behaviors in the SD–R theory. For example, research has elucidated that when students proactively use their character strengths, they report more personal resources (hope, resilience), improved happiness and subjective well-being, and reduced stress and depressive complaints (e.g., Ghielen et al., 2018 ). When students use their strengths (e.g., kindness, courage, creativity), they can be authentic and are more likely to succeed, which boosts their personal resources. In a similar vein, a recent study has shown that when students use proactive vitality management — i.e., individual, goal-oriented behavior aimed at managing physical and mental energy to promote optimal functioning (Op den Kamp et al., 2020 ), they experience more meaning and improved subjective well-being (Zhang et al., 2024 ).

Practical Recommendations

SD–R theory has several implications for practice. Here, we recommend three practical approaches that can be considered. First, the SD–R theory offers a clear framework for the assessment of student well-being and its possible causes and consequences. Higher education institutions may want to include various specific study demands and resources in their underlying survey instruments to assess drivers of student burnout, engagement, and critical outcomes (e.g., information about class attendance, course grades, dropouts, and career progress). Once a higher education institution or faculty has made a clear diagnosis of their students’ levels of study demands and resources and their predictive validity for student well-being, behaviors, and study outcomes, management could detect groups of students with the most versus least favorable study demands and resources and initiate interventions at the group or department level. For example, departments in which students report very high time pressure could take measures by adjusting courses and grading, or by offering their students training in time management, goal setting, and new efficient ways of dealing with high quantities of complex information in a short time. Departments in which students report low opportunities for skill variety could try to initiate novel ways of educating their students.

A second practical implication is that student counsellors may try to reduce self-undermining behaviors and increase proactive study behaviors through training and workshops (proven effective in job crafting interventions; for a meta-analysis, see Oprea et al., 2019 ). A recent study among students has provided evidence for the effectiveness of a study crafting intervention (Körner et al., 2023 ), showing that students can learn to optimize their own study demands and resources, and increase their own well-being. Furthermore, workshops and trainings could be organized to reduce burnout and self-undermining behaviors. These trainings may first use rational emotive training therapy or mindfulness (Madigan et al., 2023 ), and then explain how self-undermining behaviors may be warning signs of burnout. Once students have regained energy in several sessions, they may learn about study crafting to optimize their study design so that the root cause of their burnout complaints is addressed as well.

Third, higher education institutions may provide interventions for lecturers and professors to facilitate positive crossover of engagement and optimization of the study design (study demands and resources). In trainings and workshops, professors may learn about SD–R theory, role-modeling, and the crossover of teacher engagement to students (cf. Bakker, 2005 , 2022 ). Through exercises, lecturers can learn about possible ways to increase study resources for students and to stimulate proactive behaviors such as study crafting and playful study design. Research in the work context has suggested that leaders who intellectually challenge their employees and inspire and empower them can indeed increase employee proactive behaviors and engagement (Bakker, Hetland, et al., 2023 ).

In this article, we introduced the Study Demands–Resources theory to explain various processes that are involved in student well-being (burnout and engagement). We used the well-established Job Demands–Resources theory, previous Study Demands–Resources models, and existing literature on student well-being to develop 10 propositions. Our review showed that students are confronted with a variety of study demands and resources, and that it is crucial to self-regulate the impact of these study characteristics. We identified several studies showing that students can engage in proactive study behaviors, including study crafting and playful study design. Students feel more engaged when they proactively optimize their own job demands and resources and playfully redesign their study tasks to be more fun or more challenging. Higher education institutions’ management, lecturers, professors, and students may use SD–R theory to optimize student well-being and outcomes. We hope that this article will inspire educational psychology scholars, fostering collective efforts to enhance the well-being and academic success of our students.

‘t Mannetje, J., Heijne-Penninga, M., Mastenbroek, N., Wolfensberger, M., & Jaarsma, D. (2021). Personal resources conducive to educational success: High achieving students’ perspectives. Journal of the European Honors Council, 5 (1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.31378/jehc.147

Article Google Scholar

Allen, H. K., Lilly, F., Green, K. M., Zanjani, F., Vincent, K. B., & Arria, A. M. (2022). Graduate student burnout: Substance use, mental health, and the moderating role of advisor satisfaction. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 20, 1130-1146.

Allen, K., Kern, M. L., Vella-Brodrick, D., Hattie, J., & Waters, L. (2018). What schools need to know about fostering school belonging: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30 , 1–34.

Aloia, L. S., & McTigue, M. (2019). Buffering against sources of academic stress: The influence of supportive informational and emotional communication on psychological well-being. Communication Research Reports, 36 (2), 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2019.1590191

Álvarez-Pérez, P. R., López-Aguilar, D., González-Morales, M. O., & Peña-Vázquez, R. (2021). Academic engagement and dropout intention in undergraduate university students (p. 152102512110636). https://doi.org/10.1177/15210251211063611

Book Google Scholar

Bakker, A. B. (2005). Flow among music teachers and their students: The crossover of peak experiences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66 , 26–44.

Bakker, A. B. (2015). Towards a multilevel approach of employee well-being. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24 (6), 839–843. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432x.2015.1071423

Bakker, A. B. (2017). Strategic and proactive approaches to work engagement. Organizational Dynamics, 46 (2), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2017.04.002

Bakker, A. B. (2022). The social psychology of work engagement: State of the field. Career Development International, 27 , 36–53.

Bakker, A. B., & Costa, P. (2014). Chronic job burnout and daily functioning: A theoretical analysis. Burnout Research, 1 (3), 112–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burn.2014.04.003

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The Job Demands-Resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22 (3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2024). Job Demands–Resources theory: Frequently-asked questions. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology .

Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. (2023). Job Demands–Resources theory: Ten years later. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10 , 25–53.

Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. I. (2014). Burnout and work engagement: The JD–R approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1 (1), 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091235

Bakker, A. B., Hetland, J., Kjellevold-Olsen, O., & Espevik, R. (2023). Daily transformational leadership: A source of inspiration for follower performance? European Management Journal, 41 , 700–708.

Bakker, A. B., & Oerlemans, W. G. (2016). Momentary work happiness as a function of enduring burnout and work engagement. The Journal of Psychology, 150 (6), 755–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2016.1182888

Bakker, A. B., & Sanz-Vergel, A. I. (2013). Weekly work engagement and flourishing: The role of hindrance and challenge job demands. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83 (3), 397–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2013.06.008

Bakker, A. B., Sanz-Vergel, A. I., & Kuntze, J. (2015). Student engagement and performance: A weekly diary study on the role of openness. Motivation and Emotion, 39 (1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014-9422-5

Bakker, A. B., & Scharp, Y. S. (2024). It pays to play: Playful work design. In S. Parker, F. Klonek, C. Knight, & F. Zhang (Eds.), Transformative work design: Synthesis and new directions . SIOP Frontier Series.

Google Scholar

Bakker, A. B., & Van Wingerden, J. (2021). Do personal resources and strengths use increase work engagement? The effects of a training intervention. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 26 , 20–30.

Bakker, A. B., & Wang, Y. (2020). Self-undermining behavior at work: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. International Journal of Stress Management, 27 (3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/str0000150

Bakker, A. B., Xanthopoulou, D., & Demerouti, E. (2023). How does chronic burnout affect dealing with weekly job demands? A test of central propositions in JD–R and COR-theories. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 72 , 389–410.

Bear, G. G., Gaskins, C., Blank, J., & Chen, F. F. (2011). Delaware School Climate Survey—Student: Its factor structure, concurrent validity, and reliability. Journal of School Psychology, 49 (2), 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2011.01.001

Bellini, D., Barbieri, B., Barattucci, M., Mascia, M. L., & Ramaci, T. (2022). The role of a restorative resource in the academic context in improving intrinsic and extrinsic motivation and flow within the Job Demands–Resources Model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19 (22), 15263. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192215263

Bindl, U. K., & Parker, S. K. (2011). Proactive work behavior: Forward-thinking and change-oriented action in organizations. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol. 2. Selecting and developing members for the organization (pp. 567–598). American Psychological Association.

Chapter Google Scholar

Bolger, N., Davis, A., & Rafaeli, E. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54 (1), 579–616. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145030

Brouwer, J., & Engels, M. C. (2022). The role of prosocial attitudes and academic achievement in peer networks in higher education. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 37 (2), 567–584.

Bücker, S., Nuraydin, S., Simonsmeier, B. A., Schneider, M., & Luhmann, M. (2018). Subjective well-being and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 74 , 83–94.

Bumbacco, C., & Scharfe, E. (2023). Why attachment matters: First-year post-secondary students’ experience of burnout, disengagement, and drop-out. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 24 (4), 988–1001.

Calderwood, C., & Gabriel, A. S. (2017). Thriving at school and succeeding at work? A demands-resources view of spillover processes in working students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 103 , 1–13.

Cao, Y., Zhou, T., & Gao, J. (2024). Heterogeneous peer effects of college roommates on academic performance. Nature Communications, 15 , 4785.

Chaudhry, S., Tandon, A., Shinde, S., & Bhattacharya, A. (2024). Student psychological well-being in higher education: The role of internal team environment, institutional, friends and family support and academic engagement. PLoS One, 19 (1), e0297508. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297508

Cheng, J., Zhao, Y. Y., Wang, J., & Sun, Y. H. (2020). Academic burnout and depression of Chinese medical students in the pre-clinical years: The buffering hypothesis of resilience and social support. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 25 , 1094–1105.

Cho, S., Lee, M., & Lee, S. M. (2023). Burned-out classroom climate, intrinsic motivation, and academic engagement: Exploring unresolved issues in the Job Demands-Resources Model. Psychological Reports, 126 (4), 1954–1976. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941211054776

Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64 , 89–136.

Cilliers, J. R., Mostert, K., & Nel, J. A. (2018). Study demands, study resources and the role of personality characteristics in predicting the engagement of first-year university students. South African Journal of Higher Education, 32 (1). https://doi.org/10.20853/32-1-1575

Clements, A. J., & Kamau, C. (2018). Understanding students’ motivation towards proactive career behaviours through goal-setting theory and the job demands-resources model. Studies in Higher Education, 43 (12), 2279–2293. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1326022

Collie, R. J., Martin, A. J., Malmberg, L., Hall, J., & Ginns, P. (2015). Academic buoyancy, student’s achievement, and the linking role of control: A cross-lagged analysis of high school students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85 (1), 113–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12066

Demerouti, E., & Bakker, A. B. (2023). Job demands-resources theory in times of crises: New propositions. Organizational Psychology Review, 13 (3), 209–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/20413866221135022

Demerouti, E., & Bakker, A. B. (2024). Job crafting: A powerful job redesign approach. In M. C. W. Peeters, J. de Jonge, & T. Taris (Eds.), An introduction to contemporary work psychology . Wiley.

Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (3), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499

Demirović Bajrami, D., Petrović, M. D., Sekulić, D., Radovanović, M. M., Blešić, I., Vuksanović, N., Cimbaljević, M., & Tretiakova, T. N. (2022). Significance of the work environment and personal resources for employees’ well-being at work in the hospitality sector. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19 (23), 16165.

Doerksen, S. E., Elavsky, S., Rebar, A. L., & Conroy, D. E. (2014). Weekly fluctuations in college student leisure activities and well-being. Leisure Sciences, 36 , 14–34.

Dollard, M. F., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Psychosocial safety climate as a precursor to conducive work environments, psychological health problems, and employee engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83 , 579–599.

Dormann, C., & Griffin, M. (2015). Optimal time lags in panel studies. Psychological Methods, 20 (4), 489–505. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000041

Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success . Random house.

Dyrbye, L. N., Thomas, M. R., Massie, F. S., Power, D. V., Eacker, A., Harper, W., Durning, S., Moutier, C., Szydlo, D. W., Novotny, P. J., Sloan, J. A., & Shanafelt, T. D. (2008). Burnout and suicidal ideation among U.S. medical students. Annals of Internal Medicine, 149 , 334–341.

Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 97–131). Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_5

Frenzel, A. C., Becker-Kurz, B., Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., & Lüdtke, O. (2018). Emotion transmission in the classroom revisited: A reciprocal effects model of teacher and student enjoyment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110 (5), 628–639.

Gadosey, C. K., Schnettler, T., Scheunemann, A., Bäulke, L., Thies, D. O., Dresel, M., Fries, S., Leutner, D., Wirth, J., & Grunschel, C. (2023). Vicious and virtuous relationships between procrastination and emotions: An investigation of the reciprocal relationship between academic procrastination and learning-related anxiety and hope. European Journal of Psychology of Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-023-00756-8

Ghielen, S. T. S., Van Woerkom, M., & Meyers, M. C. (2018). Promoting positive outcomes through strengths interventions: A literature review. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13 , 573–585.

Gusy, B., Wörfel, F., & Lohmann, K. (2016). Erschöpfung und Engagement im Studium. Zeitschrift Für Gesundheitspsychologie, 24 (1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1026/0943-8149/a000153

Haverila, M. J., Haverila, K., & McLaughlin, C. (2020). Variables affecting the retention intentions of students in higher education institutions. Journal of International Students, 10 (2), 358–382. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v10i2.1849

Hobfoll, S. E., Halbesleben, J. R. B., Neveu, J., & Westman, M. (2018). Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5 (1), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640

Hospel, V., & Galand, B. (2016). Are both classroom autonomy support and structure equally important for students’ engagement? A multilevel analysis. Learning and Instruction, 41 , 1–10.

Hu, S. (2010). Reconsidering the relationship between student engagement and persistence in college. Innovative Higher Education, 36 (2), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-010-9158-4

Ilić, I., & Ilić, M. (2023). The relationship between the burnout syndrome and academic success of medical students: A cross-sectional study. Arhiv Za Higijenu Rada I Toksikologiju, 74 (2), 134–141. https://doi.org/10.2478/aiht-2023-74-3719

Jackson, E. R., Shanafelt, T. D., Hasan, O., Satele, D. V., & Dyrbye, L. N. (2016). Burnout and alcohol abuse/dependence among US medical students. Academic Medicine, 91 (9), 1251–1256. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001138

Jagodics, B., & Szabó, É. (2023). Student burnout in higher education: A demand-resource model approach. Trends in Psychology, 31 (4), 757–776.

Jia, J., Wang, L., Xu, J., Lin, X., Zhang, B., & Jiang, Q. (2021). Self-handicapping in Chinese medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of academic anxiety, procrastination and hardiness. Frontiers in Psychology, 12 , 741821.

Jones, E. E., & Berglas, S. (1978). Control of attributions about the self through self-handicapping strategies: The appeal of alcohol and the role of underachievement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4 , 200–206.

Junça Silva, A. J., Abreu, P., & Da Rocha Brito, S. M. (2022). The path from social and organizational resources to satisfaction: The mediating role of academic engagement and the moderating role of psychological capital. International Journal of Educational Management, 36 (5), 750–765. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijem-01-2022-0041

Kaggwa, M. M., Kajjimu, J., Sserunkuma, J., Najjuka, S. M., Atim, L. M., Olum, R., Tagg, A., & Bongomin, F. (2021). Prevalence of burnout among university students in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 16 (8), e0256402. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256402

Kaya, M., & Erdem, C. (2021). Students’ well-being and academic achievement: A meta-analysis study. Child Indicators Research, 14 (5), 1743–1767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-021-09821-4

Kiuru, N., Wang, M.-T., Salmela-Aro, K., Kannas, L., Ahonen, T., & Hirvonen, R. (2020). Associations between adolescents’ interpersonal relationships, school well-being, and academic achievement during educational transitions. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49 , 1057–1072.

Knight, C., Patterson, M., & Dawson, J. (2017). Building work engagement: A systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the effectiveness of work engagement interventions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38 , 792–812.

Körner, L. S., Mülder, L. M., Bruno, L., Janneck, M., Dettmers, J., & Rigotti, T. (2023). Fostering study crafting to increase engagement and reduce exhaustion among higher education students: A randomized controlled trial of the STUDYCoach online intervention. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 15 , 776–802.

Körner, L. S., Rigotti, T., & Rieder, K. (2021). Study crafting and self-undermining in higher education students: A weekly diary study on the antecedents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18 , 7090.

Kulikowski, K., Potoczek, A., Antipow, E., & Król, S. (2019). How to survive in academia: Demands, resources and study satisfaction among Polish PhD students. Kuram Ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 19 (4), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2019.4.005

Laughman, C. A., Boyd, E. M., & Rusbasan, D. (2016). Burnout as a mediator between work–school conflict and work outcomes. Journal of Career Development, 43 (5), 413–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845316633523

Lazazzara, A., Tims, M., & de Gennaro, D. (2020). The process of reinventing a job: A meta–synthesis of qualitative job crafting research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 116 (Part B), 103267.

Lee, S. J., Srinivasan, S., Trail, T., Lewis, D. C., & Lopez, S. (2011). Examining the relationship among student perception of support, course satisfaction, and learning outcomes in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 14 (3), 158–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.04.001

Lee, T. R., Lee, S., Ko, H., & Lee, S. M. (2022). Self-compassion among university students as a personal resource in the Job Demand-Resources Model. Educational Psychology, 42 (9), 1160–1179. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2022.2120600

Lesener, T., Gusy, B., & Wolter, C. (2019). The job demands-resources model: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies. Work & Stress, 33 , 76–103.

Lesener, T., Pleiss, L. S., Gusy, B., & Wolter, C. (2020). The study demands–resources framework: An empirical introduction. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17 , 5183.

Liu, M., Gorgievski, M. J., Zwaga, J., & Paas, F. (2023). How entrepreneurship program characteristics foster students’ study engagement and entrepreneurial career intentions: A longitudinal study. Learning and Individual Differences, 101 , 102249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102249

Liu, W., Zhang, W., van der Linden, D., & Bakker, A. B. (2023). Flow and flourishing during the pandemic: The roles of strengths use and playful design. Journal of Happiness Studies, 24 (7), 2153–2175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-023-00670-2

Llorens, S., Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2007). Does a positive gain spiral of resources, efficacy beliefs and engagement exist? Computers in Human Behavior, 23 (1), 825–841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.11.012

Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57 (9), 705–717.

Longua, J., DeHart, T., Tennen, H., & Armeli, S. (2009). Personality moderates the interaction between positive and negative daily events predicting negative affect and stress. Journal of Research in Personality, 43 , 547–555.

Loyens, S. M. M., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Schmidt, H. G. (2007). The impact of students’ conceptions of constructivist assumptions on academic achievement and drop-out. Studies in Higher Education, 32 , 581–602.

Luthans, B. C., Luthans, K. W., & Avey, J. B. (2013). Building the leaders of tomorrow. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 21 (2), 191–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051813517003

Luu, T. T., & Vo, T. T. (2020). Crafting study tasks among medical students: The role of authentic medical teachers. BMC Medical Education, 20 , 430.

Lyubomirsky, S., King, L. A., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131 (6), 803–855. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803

Ma, Y., & Bennett, D. (2021). The relationship between higher education students’ perceived employability, academic engagement and stress among students in China. Education + Training, 63 , 744–762.

Madigan, D. J., & Curran, T. (2021). Does burnout affect academic achievement? A meta-analysis of over 100,000 students. Educational Psychology Review, 33 (2), 387–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09533-1

Madigan, D. J., Kim, L. E., & Glandorf, H. L. (2023). Interventions to reduce burnout in students: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Psychology of Education , 1–27.

Martin, A. J., & Collie, R. J. (2022). The Academic and Cultural Demands-Resources (ACD-R) Framework: Supporting the academic development of culturally and ethnically diverse students. In A. J. Holliman & K. Sheehy (Eds.), Overcoming adversity in education (pp. 249–261). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003180029-22

Martin, A. J., Collie, R. J., & Nagy, R. P. (2021). Adaptability and high school students’ online learning during COVID-19: A Job Demands-Resources Perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 12 , 702163. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.702163

Martin, A. J., Ginns, P., & Collie, R. J. (2023). University students in COVID-19 lockdown: The role of adaptability and fluid reasoning in supporting their academic motivation and engagement. Learning and Instruction, 83 , 101712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101712

Martínez, I. G., Youssef-Morgan, C. M., Chambel, M. J., & Pinto, A. M. (2019). Antecedents of academic performance of university students: Academic engagement and psychological capital resources. Educational Psychology, 39 (8), 1047–1067. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1623382

Mokgele, K. R. F., & Rothmann, S. (2014). A structural model of student well-being. South African Journal of Psychology, 44 (4), 514–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081246314541589

Mostert, K., & Pienaar, J. (2020). The moderating effect of social support on the relationship between burnout, intention to drop out, and satisfaction with studies of first-year university students. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 30 (3), 197–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2020.1767928

Mülder, L. M., Schimek, S., Werner, A. M., Reichel, J. L., Heller, S., Tibubos, A. N., Schäfer, M., Dietz, P., Letzel, S., Beutel, M. E., Stark, B., Simon, P., & Rigotti, T. (2022). Distinct patterns of university students study crafting and the relationships to exhaustion, well-being, and engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 13 , 895930.

Munir, J., Faiza, M., Jamal, B., Daud, S., & Iqbal, K. (2023). The impact of socio-economic status on academic achievement. Journal of Social Sciences Review, 3 (2), 695–705. https://doi.org/10.54183/jssr.v3i2.308

Naylor, R. (2022). Key factors influencing psychological distress in university students: The effects of tertiary entrance scores. Studies in Higher Education, 47 (3), 630–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1776245

Ohly, S., Sonnentag, S., Niessen, C., & Zapf, D. (2010). Diary studies in organizational research: An introduction and some practical recommendations. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9 , 79–93.

Op den Kamp, E. M., Bakker, A. B., Tims, M., & Demerouti, E. (2020). Proactive vitality management and creative work performance: The role of self-insight and social support. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54 , 323–336.

Oprea, B. T., Barzin, L., Vîrgă, D., Iliescu, D., & Rusu, A. (2019). Effectiveness of job crafting interventions: A meta-analysis and utility analysis. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28 , 723–741.

Öz, Y., & Boyacı, A. (2021). The role of student engagement in student outcomes in higher education: Implications from a developing country. International Journal of Educational Research, 110 , 101880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101880

Pachler, D., Kuonath, A., & Frey, D. (2019). How transformational lecturers promote students’ engagement, creativity, and task performance: The mediating role of trust in lecturer and self-efficacy. Learning and Individual Differences, 69 , 162–172.

Pekrun, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2012). Academic emotions and student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 259–282). Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_5

Postema, A., Van Mierlo, H., Bakker, A. B., & Barendse, M. T. (2022). Study-to-sports spillover among competitive athletes: A field study. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology , 1–24.

Robayo-Tamayo, M., Blanco-Donoso, L. M., Román, F. J., Carmona-Cobo, I., Moreno-Jiménez, B., & Garrosa, E. (2020). Academic engagement: A diary study on the mediating role of academic support. Learning and Individual Differences, 80 , 101887.

Robins, T. G., Roberts, R. M., & Sarris, A. (2015). Burnout and engagement in health profession students: The relationships between study demands, study resources and personal resources. Australasian Journal of Organisational Psychology, 8 (e1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/orp.2014.7

Roczniewska, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2021). Burnout and self-regulation failure: A diary study of self-undermining and job crafting among nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 77 , 3424–3435.

Rudolph, C. W., Katz, I. M., Lavigne, K. N., & Zacher, H. (2017). Job crafting: A meta-analysis of relationships with individual differences, job characteristics, and work outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 102 , 112–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.05.008

Saeed, K. M., Ahmed, A. S., Rahman, Z. F., & Sleman, N. A. (2023). How social support predicts academic achievement among secondary students with special needs: The mediating role of self-esteem. Middle East Current Psychiatry, 30 (1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43045-023-00316-2

Salanova, M., Schaufeli, W. B., Martínez, I. M. M., & Bresó, E. (2010). How obstacles and facilitators predict academic performance: The mediating role of study burnout and engagement. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 23 (1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615800802609965

Salmela-Aro, K., & Read, S. (2017). Study engagement and burnout profiles among Finnish higher education students. Burnout Research, 7 , 21–28.

Salmela-Aro, K., Tang, X., & Upadyaya, K. (2022). Study Demands-Resources model of student engagement and burnout. In A. L. Reschly & S. L. Christenson (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 77–93). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07853-84

Salmela-Aro, K., & Upadyaya, K. (2014). School burnout and engagement in the context of demands-resources model. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84 (1), 137–151.

Scharp, Y., Bakker, A. B., Breevaart, K., Kruup, K., & Uusberg, A. (2023). Playful work design: Conceptualization, measurement, and validity. Human Relations, 76 , 509–550.

Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25 (3), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.248

Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3 (1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326

Schreiber, B., & Yu, D. (2016). Exploring student engagement practices at a South African university: Student engagement as a reliable predictor of academic performance. South African Journal of Higher Education, 30 (5). https://doi.org/10.20853/30-5-593

Seibert, G. S., Bauer, K. N., May, R. W., & Fincham, F. D. (2017). Emotion regulation and academic underperformance: The role of school burnout. Learning and Individual Differences, 60 , 1–9.

Simbula, S., & Guglielmi, D. (2013). I am engaged, I feel good, and I go the extra-mile: Reciprocal relationships between work engagement and consequences. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 29 (3), 117–125.

Sirois, F. M., & Kitner, R. (2015). Less adaptive or more maladaptive? A meta–analytic investigation of procrastination and coping. European Journal of Personality, 29 (4), 433–444.

Theron, B. (2022). Demands and resources experienced by first-year students in a South African higher education institute: Developing and testing an integrated framework (Unpublished Doctoral thesis) . North-West University.

Tho, N. D. (2023). Business students’ psychological capital and quality of university life: The moderating role of study crafting. Journal of Education and Training, 65 (1), 163–177. https://doi.org/10.1108/et-05-2022-0176

Thun, S., & Bakker, A. B. (2018). Empowering leadership and job crafting: The role of employee optimism. Stress and Health, 34 (4), 573–581. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2818

Tice, D. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (1997). Longitudinal study of procrastination, performance, stress, and health: The costs and benefits of dawdling. Psychological Science, 8 , 454–445.

Tims, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Job crafting: Towards a new model of individual job redesign. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 36 (2), 841. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v36i2.841

Travis, J., Kaszycki, A., Geden, M., & Bunde, J. (2020). Some stress is good stress: The challenge-hindrance framework, academic self-efficacy, and academic outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112 (8), 1632–1643. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000478

Tummers, L., & Bakker, A. B. (2021). Leadership and Job Demands-Resources theory: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12 , 722080. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.722080

Tuominen-Soini, H., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2014). Schoolwork engagement and burnout among Finnish high school students and young adults: Profiles, progressions, and educational outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 50 , 649–662.

Turhan, D., Schnettler, T., Scheunemann, A., Gadosey, C. K., Kegel, L. S., Bäulke, L., Thies, D. O., Thomas, L., Buhlmann, U., Dresel, M., Fries, S., Leutner, D., Wirth, J., & Grunschel, C. (2022). University students’ profiles of burnout symptoms amid the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany and their relation to concurrent study behavior and experiences. International Journal of Educational Research, 116 , 102081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.102081

U.S. Department of Education, & Office of Safe and Healthy Students. (2016). Quick guide on making school climate improvements . Author.

Van Zyl, A. (2016). The contours of inequality: The links between socio-economic status of students and other variables at the University of Johannesburg. Journal of Student Affairs in Africa, 4 (1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.14426/jsaa.v4i1.141

Vansteenkiste, M., Sierens, E., Soenens, B., Luyckx, K., & Lens, W. (2009). Motivational profiles from a self-determination perspective: The quality of motivation matters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101 (3), 671–688.

Vujčić, M. T., Garcia-Garzon, E., Gonul, B., & Gioaba, I. (2022). From teachers’ work engagement to pupils’ positive affect: A weekly diary study on the role of pupils’ autonomous motivation. Applied Research Quality Life, 17 , 613–633.

Wang, H., Ren, Y., & Liu, W. (2023). A weekly diary study on playful study design, study engagement, and goal attainment: The role of proactive personality. Journal of Happiness Studies, 24 (1), 159–184.

Widlund, A., Tuominen, H., & Korhonen, J. (2021). Development of school engagement and burnout across lower and upper secondary education: Trajectory profiles and educational outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 66 , 1–13.

Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25 (1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015

Wilson, E. V., & Sheetz, S. D. (2010). A demands-resources model of work pressure in IT student task groups. Computers & Education, 55 (1), 415–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.006

Wolff, W., Brand, R., Baumgarten, F., Lösel, J., & Ziegler, M. (2014). Modeling students’ instrumental (mis-) use of substances to enhance cognitive performance: Neuroenhancement in the light of job-demands-resources theory. BioPsychoSocial Medicine, 8 (1), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0759-8-12

Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26 (2), 179–201. https://doi.org/10.2307/259118

Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009). Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74 , 235–244.

Xue, Q., Yang, J., Wang, H., & Zhang, D. (2022). How and when leisure crafting enhances college students’ well-being: A (quantitative) weekly diary study. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 15 , 273–290.

Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2020). What can be learned from growth mindset controversies? American Psychologist, 75 (9), 1269.

Yeung, R., & Nguyen-Hoang, P. (2016). Endogenous peer effects: Fact or fiction? The Journal of Educational Research, 109 (1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.918528

Zhang, J., Zheng, W., Li, H., Hua, W., & Fu, M. (2024). Meaning matters: Linking proactive vitality management to subjective well-being. Journal of General Psychology, 22 , 1–24.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Center of Excellence for Positive Organizational Psychology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Woudestein Campus, Mandeville Building T16-35, PO Box 1738, 3000, DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Arnold B. Bakker

North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa

Arnold B. Bakker & Karina Mostert

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arnold B. Bakker .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Bakker, A.B., Mostert, K. Study Demands–Resources Theory: Understanding Student Well-Being in Higher Education. Educ Psychol Rev 36 , 92 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09940-8

Download citation

Accepted : 12 August 2024

Published : 19 August 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09940-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Student burnout
Student engagement
Study crafting
Study demands
Study resources
Find a journal
Publish with us
Track your research

What Is a Clinical Trial Agreement?

A clinical trial agreement (CTA) is a legally binding contract that outlines the terms, conditions, and responsibilities of all parties involved in a clinical trial, facilitating compliance with regulatory requirements and minimizing risks associated with non-compliance. This exhaustive agreement defines the scope of work, payment terms, and intellectual property rights, while verifying that the trial is conducted in accordance with relevant laws, regulations, and guidelines. By understanding the intricacies of a CTA, stakeholders can navigate the complex landscape of clinical trials with confidence, and capitalize on the full potential of a successfully executed trial.

Table of Contents

Key Components of a CTA

A thorough Clinical Trial Agreement (CTA) typically comprises several crucial elements that collectively provide a clear understanding of the terms and conditions governing the conduct of a clinical trial. These fundamental components confirm that all parties involved in the trial are aware of their contractual obligations and the regulatory requirements that must be met.

One of the primary components of a CTA is the delineation of contractual obligations, which outlines the specific responsibilities of the sponsor, investigator, and research site. This includes the scope of work, payment terms, and intellectual property rights. Regulatory compliance is another critical aspect of a CTA, as it verifies that the trial is conducted in accordance with relevant laws, regulations, and guidelines. This includes adherence to Good Clinical Practice (GCP), informed consent, and data protection protocols. By incorporating these key elements, a CTA provides a thorough framework for the successful execution of a clinical trial, while minimizing the risk of non-compliance and associated penalties.

Roles and Responsibilities

In a clinical trial, precise definition of responsibilities is essential to facilitate seamless collaboration among stakeholders, as it clarifies the specific duties and accountabilities of the sponsor, investigator, and research site. This clarity helps to prevent misunderstandings, guarantees compliance with regulatory requirements, and optimizes trial outcomes.

The following key stakeholders play pivotal parts in a clinical trial:

Sponsor : Oversees the trial, provides funding, and guarantees compliance with regulatory requirements.
Investigator : Conducts the trial, manages site operations, and safeguards participant safety.
Site Administrator : Manages site logistics, coordinates trial activities, and provides administrative support.
Study Coordinator : Assists the investigator, manages data collection, and verifies trial protocol adherence.

Clear definition of responsibilities enables effective communication, efficient trial execution, and high-quality data collection. By outlining specific duties and accountabilities, clinical trial agreements guarantee that all stakeholders understand their obligations, ultimately contributing to the trial's success.

Terms and Conditions Explained

The terms and conditions outlined in a clinical trial agreement serve as the foundation of the contractual relationship between the sponsor and the research site, governing the rights and obligations of all parties involved. These terms and conditions comprise a range of vital elements, including but not limited to, intellectual property rights, confidentiality agreements, and indemnification provisions. Effective contract negotiation is vital to confirm that the terms and conditions are mutually agreeable and align with the interests of both parties. In addition, regulatory compliance is a critical aspect of clinical trial agreements, as non-compliance can lead to severe consequences, including legal and financial repercussions. The terms and conditions must adhere to relevant regulations, such as Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and the International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) guidelines. By outlining the terms and conditions in a clear and concise manner, clinical trial agreements provide a framework for successful collaboration and guarantee that all parties are aware of their responsibilities throughout the clinical trial process.

Negotiating the Agreement Process

When negotiating a Clinical Trial Agreement, it is vital to have a clear understanding of the key terms, responsibilities, and functions of all parties involved. A well-defined timeline and deadlines are also pivotal to facilitate a smooth and efficient agreement process. By carefully considering these fundamental aspects, sponsors, investigators, and institutions can navigate the negotiation process with confidence and clarity.

Understanding Key Terms

During the negotiation process, sponsors and contract research organizations (CROs) must carefully consider the contractual terms and definitions that govern the clinical trial agreement. A thorough understanding of key terms is crucial to ensure a successful collaboration. In the complex regulatory landscape, contract jargon can often lead to confusion and misinterpretation. It is essential to clarify and define critical terms to avoid disputes and ensure compliance with regulatory requirements.

Some key terms to consider include:

Confidentiality : The protection of proprietary information and data shared between parties.
Intellectual Property (IP) : Ownership and rights related to innovative products, processes, or methods developed during the trial.
Indemnification : The allocation of liability and responsibilities for damages or losses incurred during the trial.
Dispute Resolution : The process for resolving conflicts or disagreements that may arise during the trial.

Clear definitions of key terms pave the way for effective negotiation of the clinical trial agreement, which hinges on the clear allocation of functions and responsibilities among sponsors, CROs, and other stakeholders.

The allocation of roles and responsibilities is critical to ensure the successful execution of a clinical trial. The following table outlines some of the key responsibilities of sponsors, investigators, and CROs:


Sponsor	Study design, protocol development, and regulatory compliance	Sponsor obligations, including provision of study medication and equipment
Investigator	Conducting the clinical trial, data collection, and patient safety	Investigator duties, including informed consent and data quality control
CRO	Study coordination, monitoring, and data management	Contractual obligations, including project timelines and budget management

Timeline and Deadlines

A well-defined timeline with realistic deadlines is vital for facilitating the efficient negotiation and execution of a clinical trial agreement. Establishing a clear timeline helps to guarantee that all parties involved are aware of their responsibilities and can plan accordingly. This, in turn, enables the smooth progress of the clinical trial, minimizing delays and potential bottlenecks.

To achieve a successful clinical trial, it is vital to define key milestone markers, which serve as checkpoints to monitor progress. These markers should be accompanied by realistic deadlines, allowing for flexibility when needed. Deadline flexibility is critical, as unforeseen circumstances can arise, and adjustments may be necessary to stay on track.

Some vital timeline considerations include:

Defining key milestone markers, such as study start-up, patient recruitment, and data analysis
Establishing realistic deadlines for each milestone, with built-in flexibility when possible
Identifying potential roadblocks and developing contingency plans to mitigate their impact
Regularly reviewing and updating the timeline to guarantee it remains relevant and effective

Importance of a Well-Drafted CTA

A meticulously crafted clinical trial agreement (CTA) serves as the cornerstone of a successful clinical trial, as it clarifies the functions, responsibilities, and expectations of all parties involved. A well-drafted CTA guarantees that all stakeholders are on the same page, minimizing misunderstandings and potential disputes.

A primary importance of a well-drafted CTA lies in confirming regulatory compliance. By outlining the protocol, procedures, and guidelines, the agreement certifies that the trial is conducted in accordance with relevant laws and regulations. This mitigates the risk of non-compliance, which can lead to trial delays, penalties, or even premature termination.

Furthermore, a well-drafted CTA provides financial protection to all parties involved. By clearly outlining the financial responsibilities, payment terms, and potential liabilities, the agreement safeguards the interests of sponsors, investigators, and institutions. This financial clarity helps prevent disputes and guarantees a smooth trial execution.

Common Disputes and Resolutions

In the context of a Clinical Trial Agreement (CTA), disputes can arise from various factors, including breach of contract. Effective dispute resolution mechanisms are vital to mitigate the impact of such disputes on the trial's timelines and outcomes. It is imperative to establish clear procedures for dispute escalation and resolution, guaranteeing that all parties involved are aware of their functions and responsibilities in resolving conflicts.

Breach of Contract

Breach of contract is a common dispute that arises in clinical trial agreements when one or both parties fail to fulfill their contractual obligations. This can lead to significant delays, financial losses, and reputational damage.

In such cases, the affected party may seek remedies, including damages, specific performance, or termination of the agreement. It is essential to have a clear understanding of the contractual obligations and liabilities to mitigate the risks of breach.

Some common issues that may lead to breach of contract disputes include:

Failure to meet timelines or milestones
Non-compliance with regulatory requirements
Inadequate data management or quality control
Unauthorized disclosure of confidential information

To minimize the risk of breach, it is crucial to establish clear contractual obligations, including liability caps, and ensure that both parties understand their responsibilities and liabilities. By doing so, sponsors and research institutions can reduce the likelihood of disputes and ensure successful clinical trials.

Dispute Escalation Procedures

Effective dispute escalation procedures are crucial in clinical trial agreements to resolve conflicts efficiently and minimize delays, as prompt resolution of disputes is critical to facilitating the successful execution of clinical trials. A well-structured dispute escalation procedure enables parties to address conflicts in a timely and cost-effective manner, thereby mitigating the risk of trial delays or termination.

In the event of a dispute, the agreement should outline a clear process for conflict resolution, including mediation strategies. This may involve designating a neutral third-party mediator to facilitate negotiations between the parties. The procedure should also specify the timeframe for resolving disputes, as well as the process for appealing decisions. Additionally, the agreement should define the scope of disputes that can be escalated, guaranteeing that only legitimate issues are addressed. By incorporating a robust dispute escalation procedure, clinical trial agreements can minimize the risk of disputes and facilitate the successful execution of clinical trials. This, in turn, enables the timely delivery of innovative treatments to patients in need.

Best Practices for Implementation

Clinical trial agreements require careful planning and execution to facilitate successful implementation, and several effective practices can facilitate a smooth and compliant trial process. To confirm adherence with regulatory requirements and minimize potential risks, it is vital to implement optimal practices throughout the clinical trial process.

Some vital practices for implementation include:

Establishing clear compliance frameworks to maintain regulatory adherence
Conducting thorough risk assessments to identify and mitigate potential issues
Developing detailed standard operating procedures (SOPs) to guide trial conduct
Implementing robust data management and quality control processes to maintain data integrity

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a cta be used for non-pharmaceutical research studies?.

While traditionally associated with pharmaceutical research, Clinical Trial Agreements (CTAs) can be applied to non-pharmaceutical research studies, spanning device testing, social sciences, and other fields, provided the study involves human subjects and meets regulatory requirements.

What Happens if a Sponsor Changes the Study Protocol Mid-Trial?

If a sponsor changes the study protocol mid-trial, protocol amendments may be required, potentially leading to study delays, necessitating revised informed consent and re-approval from relevant authorities, maintaining participant safety and data integrity.

Are CTAS Required for Investigator-Initiated Trials?

In investigator-initiated trials, a Clinical Trial Agreement (CTA) may not be required, as funding typically comes from internal or government sources, rather than pharmaceutical companies, preserving investigator rights and autonomy over trial design and implementation.

Can a CTA Be Terminated Early by Either Party?

A Clinical Trial Agreement (CTA) may be terminated early by either party, as specified in termination clauses, allowing for early exit due to unforeseen circumstances, with party obligations, termination fees, and contract disputes addressed accordingly.

Do CTAS Need to Comply With International Regulations?

Clinical trial agreements (CTAs) must comply with international regulations, adhering to global standards and regulatory harmonization, promoting consistency and uniformity across jurisdictions, thereby facilitating multinational clinical trials and promoting public trust.

UNLOCK YOUR COPY

COMMENTS

PDF An Introduction to Business Research
Put another way, in the honeycomb, the six main elements - namely: (1) research philosophy; (2) research approach; (3) research strategy; (4) research design; (5) data collection and (6) data analysis techniques - come together to form research methodology. This structure is characteristic of the main headings you will find in a methodology ...
Business Research: Types, Benefits, and Its Importance
Business Research helps you communicate with current and potential customers in a better way. It helps you identify opportunities and threats in the marketplace. It helps you minimize risks. Business research is used to plan investments and financial outcomes effectively. It helps you build a better market position.
Business Research: Methods, Types & Examples
Business research: Definition. Business research is a process of acquiring detailed information on all the areas of business and using such information to maximize the sales and profit of the business. Such a study helps companies determine which product/service is most profitable or in demand. In simple words, it can be stated as the acquisition of information or knowledge for professional or ...
Business Research: Definition, Types & Methods
In the context of business research, case study research might focus on organizational dynamics or company culture in an actual business setting, and case studies have been used to develop new theories about how businesses operate. Proponents of case study research feel that it adds significant value in making theoretical and empirical advances.
Business Research: Types, Methods, Examples
The importance of business research also lies in highlighting the areas where unnecessary costs can be minimized and those areas in a business which need more attention and can bring in more customers and hence boost profits. ... One of the most effective ways for business research is conducting case studies. With the motive to understand ...
Nature, Scope and Significance of Business Research
To learn about our business market research services, call +91 124 424 5210/+91 9870 377 557 or email [email protected]. Business market research is a dynamic concept. The significance of business research is that it is a fact-finding mission that fuels successful decision-making in a corporate environment.
What Is Business Research? (With Methods and Examples)
Updated August 15, 2024. Business research is the process of gathering relevant information regarding a company's business activities and using it to maximize profit. Regardless of your experience and knowledge, learning about business research can help you improve your organization's output. Researching the subject can also have a positive ...
Introduction to Business Research
Basic research refers to a focused, systematic study or investigation undertaken to discover new knowledge or interpretations and establish facts or principles in a particular field. In other words, it is a research aimed primarily at gaining knowledge rather than solving a pragmatic problem.
Doing Research in Business and Management: An Essential Guide to
This way, Doing Research in Business and Management provides a comprehensive and holistic overview of how to develop quality research in the fields of business and management, offering a detailed coverage of the relevant research approaches and methods used in these disciplines, and bringing together the essential components of the process of ...
What Is Research in Business? (With Definition and Types)
Business research refers to the process of conducting research to assist with the launch or operation of a company. Business research involves gathering data and using it to make business predictions, plans or decisions. It may involve analyzing market trends, collecting consumer information or comparing competitors within the industry.
Case Study Method: A Step-by-Step Guide for Business Researchers
Although case studies have been discussed extensively in the literature, little has been written about the specific steps one may use to conduct case study research effectively (Gagnon, 2010; Hancock & Algozzine, 2016).Baskarada (2014) also emphasized the need to have a succinct guideline that can be practically followed as it is actually tough to execute a case study well in practice.
If/Then: Why Research Matters
To wrap up the first season of If/Then: Business, Leadership, Society, we invited Senior Associate Dean Jesper B. Sørensen into the studio to talk about the importance of research at Stanford Graduate School of Business.He shares insights on what motivates faculty to study what they do and how it impacts practitioners across industries.
Nature, Scope, and Significance of Business Research
Here are some major benefits of business research: Informed Decision Making: Business research provides accurate and reliable data, enabling managers to make well-informed decisions. Market Understanding: It helps businesses understand market dynamics, customer preferences, and emerging trends. Risk Reduction: By identifying potential risks and ...
What is Business Research: Methods, Types & Examples
In business research methodology, there are two main types. These are quantitative research and qualitative research. In the simplest terms, quantitative research is about collecting numerical and factual data, whereas qualitative research is about collecting data by using open-ended questions. These two methods can be divided into more ...
Meaningfulness and Impact of Academic Research: Bringing the Global
In academia, intellectual contribution to one's field of study through publication of research defines impact. Yet, impact is not just about academic scholarship and productivity but also about real-world influence which speaks to whether research endeavors and their findings hold sufficient meaning to make a difference to human life (Abhimalla et al., 2014).
Business Research: It's Meaning, Process and Objectives
Meaning of Business Research. Business research is the process of studying a company's competitors, stakeholders, and profit & loss to meet the company objectives and maximize revenue & profits. The research involves identifying the target market, estimating their current needs & wants, and then conducting product planning to meet those demands.
Importance of research in business
Provides the latest information and updates. Change happens constantly and it is important to keep up with trends. Having research set in place keeps the business well-informed to relay the best information and meet customer demands. Retains and introduces customers. To keep a business alive, knowledge of key demographics is important in ...
Significance of the Study
Definition: Significance of the study in research refers to the potential importance, relevance, or impact of the research findings. It outlines how the research contributes to the existing body of knowledge, what gaps it fills, or what new understanding it brings to a particular field of study. In general, the significance of a study can be ...
Why Culture Matters in Business Research
The study of workplace culture is important for business research to ascertain the construct of the successful organization. The article begins with a discussion about culture, relates culture to the workplace, and ends relating important business research to workplace culture. The intended audience is business management majors and instructors ...
(PDF) Applying Qualitative Approach in Business Research
5 Faculty of Business, Design and Arts, Swinburne University of Technology, Sarawak Campus, Malaysia. 6 Division of Business Management, BNU-HKBU United International College, China ...
(PDF) Introduction to Business Research
This book is intended for graduate and senior level undergraduate students pursuing business research. It provides through and specific details for writing research in business. It is important ...
5 Reasons Why Research is Important in Business
To Better Understand Your Customers. Identifies Problem Areas. Beneficial in Comparative Studies. Helps Design New Business Opportunities. Minimizes Loss. The utilization of research through a WordPress survey tool is greatly beneficial to the evolution and the further development of a business. By exerting efforts in gathering data through ...
Research: Writing a Business Plan Makes Your Startup More Likely to Succeed
For every study that shows that it does, another study comes along and says that start-ups should just learn by doing. We wanted to study entrepreneurial planning, but with more context than ...
Steps in the Right Direction: The Importance of High-Quality Sex- and
As recently highlighted by the American Heart Association statement on Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic syndrome, people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD).1 Our understanding of the multiplicative effects of CKD and CVD on mortality has led to a deeper appreciation of the urgency of studying these frequently concomitant conditions, particularly ...
Study Demands-Resources Theory: Understanding Student Well ...
This article reviews the literature on student well-being (burnout and engagement) and their relationships with study demands and resources, student behaviors (proactive and self-undermining study behaviors), and student outcomes in higher education. Building on research that used Job Demands-Resources and Study Demands-Resources models to investigate student well-being, we develop the ...
What Is a Clinical Trial Agreement?
While traditionally associated with pharmaceutical research, Clinical Trial Agreements (CTAs) can be applied to non-pharmaceutical research studies, spanning device testing, social sciences, and other fields, provided the study involves human subjects and meets regulatory requirements. What Happens if a Sponsor Changes the Study Protocol Mid-Trial?

Business Research Methods by Emma Bell
Business Research Methods by Donald R. Cooper
Essentials of Business Research Methods by Joseph F. Hair Jr
Management and Business Research by SAGE Publications
Data Analysis in Business Research by D Isarel


	USA	20 Months	=1
Stanford Graduate School of Business	USA	2 Years	1
	Multiple Campuses	10 Months	6
	USA	2 Years	3
	USA	2 Years	5
	UK	15-21 Months	7
	France	16 Months	5
	USA	21 Months	11=
IESE Business School	Spain	15/19 Months	11=
Judge Business School	UK	1 Year	15
Saïd Business School	UK	1 Year	16
ESADE Business School	Spain	12/15/18 Months	13
Yale School of Management	USA	2 Years	17=
Imperial College Business School	UK	1 Year	22
	Italy	1 Year	23

How Newly Qualified Nurse Practitioners can Regulate Work-Life Balance

What Are The Benefits Of Retail Virtual Merchandising?

How to Achieve an Organic Link-Building Presence

Types of Business Research

Benefits of Business Research

Why is Business Research Important?

ROBOTS SUBSCRIPTION

Privacy Overview

Business Research: Methods, Types & Examples

Business research: Definition

Business research: Types and methodologies

MORE LIKE THIS

Age Gating: Effective Strategies for Online Content Control

Customer Experience Lessons from 13,000 Feet — Tuesday CX Thoughts

Insight: Definition & meaning, types and examples

Employee Loyalty: Strategies for Long-Term Business Success

Try Qualtrics for free

What is business research?

Why is business research important?

Types of business research

Qualitative research methods

Focus groups

Observational studies

Ethnographic Research

Case study research

Quantitative research methods

Correlational research

Experimental research

The best tools for business research

Related resources

45,000+ students realised their study abroad dream with us. Take the first step today

Business Research: Types, Methods, Examples

This Blog Includes:

Qualitative Research Methods

Quantitative Research Methods

Team Leverage Edu

8 Universities with higher ROI than IITs and IIMs

Connect With Us

Need help with?

Country Preference

Which English test are you planning to take?

When are you planning to take the exam?

Which Degree do you wish to pursue?

What is your budget to study abroad?

Market Research Blog

What is Involved in Business Research?

The Nature of Business Research

The Scope of Business Research

Problem Identification

Market Analysis and Competitive Intelligence

Decision Support

Innovation and Adaptation

Performance Evaluation

Importance of Business Research

Key Advantages of Business Research

Significance of Business Research in Local and Global Business Fields

Key Steps in Conducting Business Research

Identify and Define the Research Problem

Develop Research Objectives

Design the Research Methodology

Collect Data

Analyze Data

Interpret Findings

Communicate Results

Validate and Verify

Implement Recommendations

Reflect and Learn

Quick Enquiry

Recent Posts

Other Blogs

Get in Touch

Stay connected for latest updates

Inquire With Us

Thank you!!!

Doing Research in Business and Management: An Essential Guide to Planning Your Project

A About the reviewer

Related articles

Report an issue or find answers to frequently asked questions

About Stanford GSB

About the Experience