thesis statement on animal abuse

Home — Essay Samples — Social Issues — Animal Rights — Thesis Statement For Animals Deserve Rights, And Their Rights

Thesis Statement for Animals Deserve Rights, and Their Rights

• Categories: Animal Rights Animal Welfare

About this sample

Words: 671 |

Published: Mar 5, 2024

Words: 671 | Page: 1 | 4 min read

Table of contents

Thesis statement, history and debates, development and resolution.

Cite this Essay

Let us write you an essay from scratch

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Prof Ernest (PhD)

Verified writer

• Expert in: Social Issues Environment

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

2 pages / 1083 words

4 pages / 1783 words

2 pages / 878 words

3 pages / 1351 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Animal Rights

PETA, also known as People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, is a globally recognized organization that advocates for animal rights and aims to bring about change in society's attitudes towards animals. Since its [...]

Animal rights have become a pressing topic in modern-day society due to the increased awareness of animal welfare and ethical responsibilities. The concept of animal rights involves the recognition of animals as sentient beings [...]

As the debate surrounding marine mammal captivity continues to gain traction, the case of Lolita, a captive killer whale at the Miami Seaquarium, serves as a focal point for discussions on animal welfare, conservation, and [...]

Animal testing has been a controversial topic for many years, with strong arguments on both sides. However, the practice of using animals for testing purposes is not only ethically questionable but also scientifically [...]

Zoos have been a topic of debate for many years, with some arguing that they play a crucial role in conservation efforts, while others believe that they are unethical and should be banned. This essay will explore the history of [...]

“Elephants in the wild travel up to 50 miles every day” and hundreds of those elephants are captured and bred into captivity (Dahl 1). Keeping them would be inherently cruel, for they would have to live the rest of their lives [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free

On Animal Abuse and Cruelty Expository Essay

An example of an organization aimed at reducing animal suffering, works cited.

Animal abuse is defined as a deliberate infliction of psychological pain, distress, deprivation, or death of an animal by human beings. Animal abuses occur every time human beings fail to meet the animals’ basic needs. In general, animal abuses comprise of all intentional, socially, and unacceptable behaviors that threatens the welfare of our fellow animals.

Such behaviors include kicking, throwing, malicious killing, use of animals for research and entertainment, and neglect and failure to provide an animal with adequate food and veterinary care. Notably, in our factory farms millions of animals such as dairy cows, sheep, pigs, and chickens suffer extremely in the production of food, clothing, and other animal products for human consumption. Surprisingly, many individuals in our society are unaware of these sufferings inflicted on animals.

In the USA, 70% of all human foods comprises of animal products. These animal products are produced behind closed barn doors that house the animals producing them. Before the 20 th century, cattle, pigs, and poultry in the USA used to roam in green pastures. However, the increase in human population has forced farm factories to confine these animals to specific cages to meet the ever- increasing demand for animal products.

Most meat products are produced in farm industries that confine, mistreat, and deny the animals their natural behavior needs. Although these practices should be unlawful, amendments to the Animal Cruelty Act have seen animals excluded from being treated fairly. As such, these farm factories are almost free to subject their animals to severe suffering with the intention of increasing their products.

In developed countries, industrialization of agriculture has seen dairy cows being exploited to meet the increase in demand for milk (Schmid 1). As compared to the dairy cows reared 60 years ago, modern dairy cows have been demeaned from cattle to objects. Currently, dairy cows produce 3 times the milk they could have produced at that time.

This has been made possible through modern technologies that have focused on improving the animals’ udder size and production. Currently, dairy cows are confined in barns or drylot feed yards. In these cages, the animals are confined indoors for the whole year denying them their right to roam and feel the heat of the sun (Rimas & Evan 12).

More often, lactating cows are restrained in stalls forcing them to stand in between manure and a mixture of storm water. Dairy farms have adopted genetic selection and selective feeding programs with the aim of increasing milk production. It should be noted that cows’ bodies do not adapt quickly to the high-grained feeds fed to them in the farm factories. Therefore, these feeding methods should be blamed for the increase in metabolic disorders among the dairy cows.

Because of being fed and raised in an unnatural environment, these animals have become more vulnerable to the cattle disease that they would have resisted unrestrained. Among the diseases that these cattle have become vulnerable to is mastitis. According to the veterinary experts, millions of dairy cows suffer from the disease causing them to endure painful infections of their udders.

After birth, calves are separated from their mothers. Thereafter, male calves are castrated, or killed for veal (Burros 1). Given the fact that these calves are not given opportunities to live their normal lives, human beings should feel compassion for such animals. On the other hand, female calves are raised in special stalls until they are mature enough to be impregnated.

In their stalls, these animals are subjected to intense suffering through removal of extra teats, tail docking, and dehorning. In the US, it is estimated that thousands of dairy cow’s calves succumb to scours and diarrhea.

Just like the dairy cows, chickens are subjected to intense suffering in the poultry farms. By being subjected through battery farming methods, chickens are forced to live in tiny cages that do not allow them to turn around. In these cages, the birds cannot stretch their wings, walk around, or sit comfortably while laying eggs (Ginzburg 1).

To avoid birds from fighting one another, their beaks are cut off using sharp metals through painful enduring processes. Some animal activists have real footages of poultry workers mistreating these animals. In these footages, some workers have been captured handling the birds in hostile ways, shoving the birds into their cages, and crushing the birds’ feet in the cage doors.

Through these footages, it is heartbreaking to imagine the kind of suffering chickens undergo through in their cages. According to some articles, when a bird limb is stuck in the cage parts, the bird is immobilized and if the animal is not rescued in time, it will die a slow painful death.

With these kinds of heartbreaking deaths that chicken endures in their poultry farmers, it is high time that consumers should be concerned with the welfare of these animals and campaigned against their inhumane treatments. In the USA, 97% of all the eggs consumed are from chickens reared in cages. The above percentage is disturbing considering the extent of suffering endured by birds reared in battery cages.

In farm industries, pigs are the other victims of animal suffering. Immediately they are born, they are forced to bear agonizing surgical procedures such as tail docking and castration (Bdale 1).

Afterwards, they are denied their chance to be with their mother by being taken away and locked in crowded enclosures. While pregnant, their mothers are locked up in tiny cages for up to 16 weeks. Usually, the cages are so small that the animals cannot walk around or turn around. In the cages, these animals have to endure boredom and depression.

Prior to giving birth, the animals are relocated to smaller cages referred to as farrowing crates (Bdale 1). When they give birth, the piglets can suckle from outside the farrowing crates. Since their mother is trapped between the tiny cages, the piglets can hurt her nipples without her defending herself.

Based on the above real experiences, it is heartbreaking to imagine the extent of pain pigs have to endure through to meet the pork demand. Human beings should realize that pigs feel pain, undergo through stress, and suffer just as our pets. Therefore, we should look for better ways of reducing and ending the suffering, we have subjected pigs in our factory farms.

In the USA, several organizations have been formed to attempt to reduce the suffering of animals in farm industries. American Humane is such an organization formed with the aim of safeguarding children and animals’ welfares.

This nonprofit organization has been concerned with the way animals are being treated in our farms. Currently, through its extended programs the organization is engaged in trying to improve farm programs. Through this program, the organization aims at ensuring that farms certified under their programs meet the required animal welfare standards.

Despite the relentless efforts of such organizations to end animal suffering, billions of animals continue to die and suffer from the inhumane conditions of our factory farms. According to underground investigations, most animal products for human consumption are the products of horrific deaths.

It is facts that as long as human beings are going to depend on animal products for consumption animal suffering will continue to persist. In this regard, animal activists, governments, and the consumers should be committed to preventing, ending, and denouncing animal suffering. Equally, appropriate regulations should be formulated to lessen the suffering and improve the welfare of these animals.

Researchers should work tirelessly to ensure they design appropriate facilities for farm animals. These facilities should be stress free and enhance the welfare of the animals. Similarly, appropriate slaughtering methods should be designed to reduce the pain endured by animals in slaughterhouses.

In conclusion, human beings should note that they are morally obligated to let animals enjoy the brief lives before they are slaughtered. As such, it will be more appropriate if animal farms allowed these animals to roam freely in their habitats. Equally, animal slaughterhouses should adopt ethical means of slaughtering these animals.

Likewise, if we humans preach and practice civilized morals in our society, animal suffering in our farm factories should be put to an end because animals have every right to enjoy their existence as we humans.

Burros, Marian. “Veal to Love, Without the Guilt – NYTimes.com.” The New York Times – Breaking News, World News & Multimedia . Version 1. N.p., 18 Apr. 2007. Web. < https://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/18/dining/18veal.html?searchResultPosition=1&mtrref=www.nytimes.com >.

Bdale, David. “Factory Farms Revealed: Animal Abuse and Cruelty | The Last Newspaper.” The Last Newspaper | Rowan University Comp 1 Fall 2010 Hodges . Version 1 . N.p., 13 Oct. 2010. Web.

Ginzburg, Ralph. “ANIMAL-RIGHTS GROUP ASSAILS EGG FARM – New York Times.” The New York Times – Breaking News, World News & Multimedia . Version 1. N.p., 17 Jan. 1988. Web. < https://www.nytimes.com/1988/01/17/nyregion/animal-rights-group-assails-egg-farm.html?searchResultPosition=1 >.

Rimas, Andrew, and Evan D. G. Fraser. Beef: the untold story of how milk, meat, and muscle shaped the world . New York, NY: William Morrow, 2008. Print.

Schmid, Ronald F. The untold story of milk: the history, politics and science of nature’s perfect food : raw milk from pasture-fed cows . Rev. and updated. ed. Washington, DC: NewTrends Pub., 2009. Print.

• Housing and Floor Design for Dairy Cows
• Safety of Birds in Confinement
• Laying Hens Farm: Peach Farm and Olive Farm
• Negative Impacts of Animal Testing
• Life of Polar Bears
• The Semi-aquatic Mammals Pinnipedia
• Chemical Engineering and Influence on Economics
• Shaping of the Middle East
• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2018, June 22). On Animal Abuse and Cruelty. https://ivypanda.com/essays/animal-abuse/

"On Animal Abuse and Cruelty." IvyPanda , 22 June 2018, ivypanda.com/essays/animal-abuse/.

IvyPanda . (2018) 'On Animal Abuse and Cruelty'. 22 June.

IvyPanda . 2018. "On Animal Abuse and Cruelty." June 22, 2018. https://ivypanda.com/essays/animal-abuse/.

1. IvyPanda . "On Animal Abuse and Cruelty." June 22, 2018. https://ivypanda.com/essays/animal-abuse/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "On Animal Abuse and Cruelty." June 22, 2018. https://ivypanda.com/essays/animal-abuse/.

Essay on Cruelty to Animals

• February 9, 2023

Cruelty to Animals

Introduction

Cruelty to animals is a widespread issue that has been plaguing our society for centuries. While many people view animals as mere commodities, they are sentient beings with the capacity to experience physical and emotional pain, fear, and stress. As a result, animal cruelty encompasses a wide range of behaviors that cause harm to animals, from intentional acts of violence and neglect to practices that exploit and mistreat them for human gain.

Body Paragraphs

The consequences of animal cruelty are not only harmful to the animals themselves, but also have far-reaching effects on society as a whole. Research has shown that individuals who engage in animal cruelty are more likely to exhibit other violent behaviors, including interpersonal violence and other forms of criminal activity (Arluke, Levin, & Luke, 1997). Furthermore, cruelty to animals is often indicative of larger social problems, such as poverty, drug abuse, and domestic violence, that can have serious consequences for individuals, families, and communities (Ascione, Weber, & Wood, 1997).

Despite the prevalence and impact of animal cruelty, there are few effective laws and policies in place to address this issue. For example, many states have inadequate animal cruelty laws that do not provide for adequate penalties for offenders, or that are not properly enforced by law enforcement officials (Ascione et al., 1997). In addition, many animal protection organizations lack the resources necessary to effectively combat animal cruelty and provide care for the victims of abuse (Arluke et al., 1997).

There are many ways in which society can take action to reduce animal cruelty and prevent further harm to animals. For example, individuals can make a difference by speaking out against animal cruelty and supporting animal protection organizations through volunteering, donating, and advocating for stronger animal protection laws. Governments can play a role by enacting and enforcing stronger animal cruelty laws, and by providing adequate funding for animal protection organizations and law enforcement agencies to carry out their missions.

Education is also a critical component of efforts to reduce animal cruelty. By raising awareness about the issue and its consequences, we can encourage people to adopt more compassionate and responsible attitudes towards animals, and to reject cruelty in all its forms. This can be achieved through school curriculums, community outreach programs, and media campaigns that promote the humane treatment of animals.

In conclusion, animal cruelty is a complex and pervasive issue that requires the combined efforts of individuals, governments, and communities to address. While the challenges are significant, there is also much reason for hope. By working together, we can create a more compassionate and just world for all animals, and help to reduce the harm and suffering that they are subjected to every day.

Arluke, A., Levin, J., & Luke, C. (1997). Understanding Animal Abuse: A Sociological Analysis. State University of New York Press.

Ascione, F. R., Weber, C. V., & Wood, D. (1997). The abuse of animals and domestic violence: A national survey of shelters for women who are battered. Society & Animals, 5(3), 205-218.

Recently on Tamara Blog

Essay on Animal Farm by Orwell – Free Essay Samples

“Animal Farm” by George Orwell is a literary masterpiece that tells the story of a group of farm animals who rebel against their human farmer and establish a socialist community based on the principles of equality and mutual respect (Orwell, 1945). However, over time, the pigs who lead the revolution gradually become corrupted by power and begin to oppress and exploit the other animals, ultimately turning the farm into a totalitarian state.

Essay on Cyberbullying – Free Essay Samples

Bullying is an aggressive behavior that is intentional and repeated, aimed at causing harm or discomfort to a person, and often takes place in social environments such as schools, workplaces, and online platforms. Cyberbullying is a relatively new form of bullying that has emerged with the widespread use of technology and the internet. Cyberbullying refers to bullying behaviors that occur online or through electronic means, such as social media, text messages, and emails.

Essay on Nature vs. Nurture – Free Essay Samples

The debate over nature versus nurture has been a longstanding topic of interest among psychologists and other scholars. The two concepts, nature and nurture, are frequently used to explain human development and behavior.

Lord of the Flies Essay – Free Essay Samples

Veterans have played a critical role in the history of the United States, serving their country in times of war and peace. Despite their sacrifices, many veterans face significant challenges, including physical and mental health issues, homelessness, and unemployment.

Why Veterans Are Important – Free Essay Samples

American dream essay – free essay samples.

The American Dream has been a central concept in American culture for decades, representing the idea that anyone, regardless of their background, can achieve success and prosperity through hard work and determination. The concept of the American Dream is rooted in the country’s history and has been promoted in various ways, from the founding fathers’ beliefs to the post-World War II era.

Cruelty To Animals - Free Essay Examples And Topic Ideas

Cruelty to animals refers to the infliction of suffering or harm upon animals for purposes other than self-defense or survival. Essays on cruelty to animals could delve into the different forms of animal cruelty, the underlying causes, and the societal implications. Discussions might also explore the legal frameworks for animal protection, the role of animal welfare organizations, and the public awareness campaigns against animal cruelty. Moreover, analyzing the ethical considerations, the cultural attitudes towards animals, and the broader societal impact of animal cruelty can provide a comprehensive understanding of this significant moral and social issue. A substantial compilation of free essay instances related to Cruelty To Animals you can find in Papersowl database. You can use our samples for inspiration to write your own essay, research paper, or just to explore a new topic for yourself.

Cruelty to Animals in Circuses

The circus was created by a man named Philip Astley. Astley had served in the seven years war and when he was discharged he decided to imitate the trick- riders. In 1768, he opened up a riding school and had a building that was a circular area which he called the circle, or circus. In 1770 Astley decided his performance needed more novelty and added acrobats, rope-dancers, and jugglers to perform alongside his horse displays. By the late 1700’s there […]

The Americans for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals ASPCA

Introduction Service learning and community partnership incorporates academic learning into service projects that becomes more common and popular in today's community. What it does is teaches us about the history and needs of the agency being helped as well as seeing positive changes that their involvement makes. Just by incorporating different aspects of learning into community service, we can become invested in their work and more likely to stay committed to the cause. The cause of the agency is to […]

Animal Testing should be Banned

Many organizations are debating whether animal testing ought to be banned in the U. S. Some believe that animal testing ought to be done. At the same time, others believe that animal testing is completely wrong. Some experts believe that other options can be available instead of doing the test on animals. Using animals to test the safety of certain products and for medical research purposes is wrong, and it should be made a point that the pain and suffering […]

We will write an essay sample crafted to your needs.

Cruelty to Animals and Animal Testing

Animal cruelty can be defined in many ways: Being violent to animals in any way, failure to provide for animals, being neglectful to animals. Also causing animals psychological harm in the form of distress, torment or terror may also constitute animal cruelty (RSPCA). For example when picking out eyeliner or other makeup products, do people stop to see at the stores what kind of makeup they are buying and using? People could be supporting animal testing and cruelty and not […]

Types of Animal Cruelty

The definition of animal cruelty varies from person to person and although it is talked about occasionally, many people tend to downplay the seriousness of it. Animal abuse comes in many forms such as scientific research, abandonment, mistreatment, and so on. The experimentation and cruelty committed should be banned because animals share the same basic rights as humans. Without a doubt, mistreatment of animals is the most common form of animal cruelty. It comes in many forms which are: animal […]

Reasons of Animal Cruelty

"The Humane Society of the United States estimates that nearly 1 million animals a year are abused or killed in episodes of domestic violence" (Rajewski). Animal abuse is referred to as an act of intentional mistreatment against animals and is inflicted by humans for reasons other than survival or self-defense. The topic of animal cruelty has been debated for an extremely long time, but nothing has changed for the past decade, and people continue to use violence against animals. It […]

The Cruelty in Animal Testing

Every year in the United States, it is estimated that tens of millions of animals are used for research and testing purposes (Animal Experimentation 50). These animals are usually mice, rats, rabbits, fish, guinea pigs, non-human primates, and other farm animals. Test animals undergo testing for cosmetics and household products, trials for new medicines, and scientific experiments. These tests and experiments are uncomfortable and often painful for the animals. The United States has laws to protect animals, but there are […]

The Definition of Animal Cruelty

The definition of animal cruelty is the infliction by omission or by commission by humans of suffering or harm upon any non-human. A car like any other is driving down the street, rain pounding on the windshield. The girl in the passenger seat sees a dark blur on the side of the road. She focuses on it, and sees a soaked dog, whose fur is severely matted, and covered in mud. Its tail had no wag, and it was so […]

Animal Research for Human Benefit is Unnecessary

Most people believe animal testing is essential to drug and vaccine research. Which is true, in a sense, because scientist have come up with a lot of vaccines for certain viruses. However, during the process, animals are treated poorly and their cages are in awful conditions. Most of the chemicals being administered into these patients are not safe for them, which sometimes results in death. Not only that, animals cannot comprehend what humans can. They cannot speak for themselves. These […]

Housing Animals in Zoos is Inhumane

In the recent times, the practice of housing animals in zoos has become a major problem and a point of debate among different stakeholders, zoo advocated and animal rights advocates across the world. Everybody has a different opinion on the issue with some advocating for the act while others are against it. For instance, in the article Increasing Legal Rights for Zoo Animals, the author stated that, animal rights activists, have been arguing that, housing animals in zoos violates their […]

Industrial Farm Animal Welfare in the United States

Industrial farm animal welfare is horrendous, only two federal laws protect these animals which proves this true. Firstly, the law regarding trucking animals states that every 28 hours they are unloaded from the truck for rest, water and food. Trucks aren't required to be cleaned during this rest period. Meaning the livestock has to stand in feces during travel. Secondly, livestock be quickly rendered insensible to pain before being slaughtered. These laws aren't actively enforced leading to increased animal cruelty. […]

What is Animal Cruelty?

Animal cruelty is the act of humans inflicting harm and suffering onto an animal. This can include neglect, animal fighting, and overt abuse. In the United States, an animal is abused every ten seconds. Animal protection organizations are working to stop animal cruelty everywhere. Many of these organizations believe in animal rights and animal welfare. Animal rights activists usually go to the extremes, and will even break laws to make a statement to the public. One point of contention for […]

Alternatives to Animal Testing: a Glimpse into the Innovative and Compassionate Future of Scientific Research

Let's chat about something. You’ve probably heard whispers of testing stuff on animals. Whether you're in camp "necessary evil" or team "save the bunnies," there's some pretty snazzy news. We've got alternative methods bubbling up, blowing our minds. Scientists have found a way to grow miniature human organs in labs. Imagine a teensy liver or a bite-sized brain being used to check if that new face cream is safe. It’s all about getting results without making Fido or Thumper shed […]

Animal Cruelty under the Big Top

P.T. Barnum, who is credited with the creation of the traditional American circus, once said, "The noblest art is that of making others happy." Barnum, often regarded as the "Greatest Showman", used his talents to market a new kind of entertainment: a show based on human curiosities and unprecedented phenomena. The circus focuses on providing family-friendly amusement with bright lights, booming music, exotic animals and of course; peanuts and cotton candy. However, things are not as innocent as they seem […]

Animal Abuse Speech: Unveiling the Cruel Reality

Understanding Animal Abuse: Animal abuse is one of the most tragic and preventable crimes in society. Every year, thousands of animals are beaten, neglected, or forced to suffer in many ways. The vast majority of these animals are defenseless dogs and cats, but horses, rabbits, birds, and other animals are also victims of Abuse. Most animal abusers are not sociopaths; they are everyday people who care about other people and animals. But for whatever reason, they allow their anger, frustration, […]

Featured Categories

Additional example essays.

• Does Arrest Reduce Domestic Violence
• Discrimination in Workplace
• Should Teachers Carry Guns
• What A Streetcar Named Desire lost in the film
• Solutions to Gun Violence
• Catherine Roerva: A Complex Figure in the Narrative of Child Abuse
• Leadership and the Army Profession
• Why Abortion Should be Illegal
• Death Penalty Should be Abolished
• Dogs Are Better Than Cats Essay
• Personal Philosophy of Leadership
• Gender Roles in the Great Gatsby

Essay About Cruelty to Animals A case arose in Birmingham where the former attorney killed his Staffordshire Terrier brutally by lacerating his throat region. The law took the action against this animal violence and the former attorney was convicted to probation. However, the former attorney violated another sanction as he was in contact with his ex-wife. The judge punished him by sending him to jail for a day. According to John Willey, the attorney of James Stewart Robinson, he was punished to a 5-year sentence which was previously suspended, and 3 years probation as well. This punishment was under the class C felony brutality against innocent animals. In addition, 1 year suspended sentence followed by 2-year probation was for the domestic violence and harassment charge. The proceedings are still continuing as the domestic violence charge has been appealed to the circuit court directly from the Vestavia Municipal Court. The retired Clay County Circuit Judge John Rochester was specifically appointed for this hearing and according to Wiley the one day jail was also imposed by John Rochester. Wiley further explained that St Clair County, who was also specifically appointed for this hearing, told Rochester right before the Friday hearing that the culprit had emailed the Happy New Year and the Merry Christmas messages during the Christmas time to his ex-wife. He further stated, “Not threatening or ugly, really just Merry Christmas. But, (his ex-wife) didn’t like him (Robinson) contacting her even in that way, according to the DA, and she contacted them about it”. Rochester had ordered Robison very clearly in the hearing that was held in July that he will have no contact with his ex-wife and the one day jail was the result of the violation of the orders. In an email to Al.com. Wiley stated that “We are very happy to have this unfortunate incident finally resolved and we believe that the resolution reached is a good, fair and appropriate one”. Another District attorney appointed fir this case from the St Clair County had not taken any action on the request of the comment prior to the story publication. Robison was found guilty of class C felony, first degree brutality to a dog and domestic violence of third degree. According to the records of the court, the domestic violence charge was related to the picture of a dog with a lacerated throat he had texted to his ex-wife. He had also left a voice note for her stating “your day is coming girl'. Robinson pleaded for probation but the Rochester ordered the officers to conduct a pre-sentencing report before he jumps to the conclusion of the case. Robison admitted during the hearing that he has crossed his limits by killing Rufus. He further said that he had an addiction to Adderall as he was suffering from ADHD. Rochester forced Robinson to explain the exact act of killing the dog. Robinson responded after a minor pause “I killed him by slicing his throat”. As a lawyer, Robinson was inactive since his arrest. He also apologized for his doings after he was found guilty. Dwight Sloan, Jefferson’s County Sheriff’s animal cruelty investigator, was appointed for the case investigation. Robison talked about his drug addiction and he said that he is trying to recover and he has been helping other lawyers dealing with drug addiction. It happened when he developed a strong addiction to Adderall right in 2009. As a result of it, in 2012, his wife filed for a divorce. He further explained about his addiction that he got furious, deprived of sleep and he killed Rufus exactly when he was on Adderall. He also said that “Rufus was a very loving dog and I am horrified that I crossed a line that never in a million years I thought I would cross”. After being charged with cruelty to the dog, Robinson surrendered. The five-month probe was also a part of this investigation which involves canine exhumation and an investigation that was conducted in the Florida Animal Forensic Lab. The story comes with a very convincing message that no matter how much powerful you are, everyone is equal before the law and every living being deserves all the fundamental rights either it is an animal or a human being.

1. Tell Us Your Requirements

2. Pick your perfect writer

3. Get Your Paper and Pay

Hi! I'm Amy, your personal assistant!

Don't know where to start? Give me your paper requirements and I connect you to an academic expert.

short deadlines

100% Plagiarism-Free

Certified writers

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Animals (Basel)

Animal Abuse as an Indicator of Domestic Violence: One Health, One Welfare Approach

Daniel mota-rojas.

1 Neurophysiology of Pain, Behavior and Assessment of Welfare in Domestic Animals, DPAA, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (UAM), Mexico City 04960, Mexico; xm.mau.cox.sonmula@1361082912 (K.L.-G.); xm.mau.cox.sonmula@5191082122 (A.D.-O.); xm.moc.oohay@oirotlusnocen (R.R.-N.)

Stefany Monsalve

2 Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Programa de Especialización en Bienestar Animal y Etología, Fundación Universitaria Agraria de Colombia, Calle 170 No 54 A 10, Bogotá 111321, Colombia; oc.ude.lanu@bevlasnoms

3 Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Fundación Universitaria San Martín, Carrera 18 No 80 45, Bogotá 110221, Colombia

Karina Lezama-García

Patricia mora-medina.

4 Animal Welfare and Behavior Center, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Cuautitlán, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Mexico City 54714, Mexico; xm.manu.naltituauc@taparom

Adriana Domínguez-Oliva

Ramiro ramírez-necoechea, rita de cassia maria garcia.

5 Veterinary Medicine of the Collective and Veterinary Social Work, Legal Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 80060-000, Brazil

Associated Data

Not applicable.

Simple Summary

Animal abuse is widely recognized as both a risk factor for and a potential consequence of interpersonal violence. In children, especially, factors such as dysfunctional families, antisocial personality, physical, psychological, or intimate abuse, and frequent exposure to domestic aggression or animal abuse have been confirmed as factors that can predispose young people to perform acts of animal cruelty. It is important to recognize warning signs such as those identified as the McDonald triad (bedwetting, pyromania, animal cruelty). A one health, one welfare approach, incorporating physicians, veterinarians, other health care professionals, social workers, and humane education, is critical for the recognition, management, and prevention of domestic violence, involving both humans and other animals.

For years now, the importance of animal cruelty has been gaining recognition in the industrialized cities of the West. Animal cruelty encompasses any act that causes a non-human animal unnecessary pain or suffering, including negligence, abandonment, abuse, torture, bestiality, and even theriocide. This represents a red flag for society as a whole because people who commit such acts can escalate violence and direct it to other individuals. Animal cruelty and interpersonal violence—as well as other socially undesirable conduct such as bullying, antisocial personality disorder, rape, and serial murder—are closely related, so timely diagnoses of either one can help prevent acts of aggression. It is necessary, therefore, to analyze and try to understand whether there are early indicators that may help identify potentially violent individuals. It is well known that kids from homes with actual violence in their homes show a high tendency to reproduce such behaviors with both animals and other people. In conclusion, much research and rethinking of the importance of the veterinarian in detecting animal abuse and cruelty is needed to help detect and prevent cases of interpersonal violence that may arise over time.

1. Introduction

Animal cruelty, maltreatment, and abuse began to emerge as socially important issues in industrialized cities of the West in the 18th century [ 1 , 2 ], and include a wide variety of harmful behavior towards animals, from unintentional neglect to malicious killing [ 3 ]. The definition of these terms can vary among countries and research/review papers, or sometimes are used as synonyms, causing confusion [ 3 , 4 ]. For this review, the terms cruelty, abuse, and maltreatment are used as synonyms because studies linking interpersonal violence to animal abuse use the terms interchangeably and refer to non-acceptable social behaviors that intentionally cause pain, suffering, distress, or even the death of an animal [ 5 ], including acts of non-accidental injury, abandonment, neglect, or torture that may occur as kicking, hitting, stabbing animals, failing to provide food and water [ 6 ], veterinary services [ 7 ], organized fights, sexual abuse (bestiality), burns, wounds with projectiles or sharp weapons, shootings, suffocation, poisoning [ 8 ], or even theriocide [ 9 , 10 ]. Animal cruelty can affect any animal species but the ones most often victimized are dogs and cats [ 11 , 12 , 13 ].

Many studies have shown a significant relationship between animal abuse with interpersonal violence, including domestic or family violence (violent acts between family members and intimate partners that occur at home but not exclusively) [ 14 ], and community violence (violence between unrelated individuals that may or may not know each other, it tends to occur outside the home [ 7 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ]. One reason for this association is that in some cases of domestic violence abusers harm animals to intimidate and impose psychological control over their victims [ 18 , 21 , 22 ]. Similarly, acts of animal cruelty in children have been reported. The socioemotional well-being of children who witness domestic violence—often perpetrated by the mother’s intimate partner—may be compromised, leaving them at a higher risk of committing animal abuse themselves [ 23 ]. Thus, animal abuse can serve as an indicator of child abuse, family violence, or violent criminal behavior [ 24 ]. The first report to show a relationship between interpersonal violence and animal abuse was published by Pinel in 1806. It documented the behavior of a man who was violent towards both animals and humans [ 25 ].

MacDonald [ 15 ] observed a relationship between, on the one hand, a triad of enuresis, pyromania (fire-setting), and animal cruelty during childhood and, on the other, a predisposition of those children to become violent criminals as adults. Mead [ 26 ] reported that cruelty perpetrated upon animals by children could indicate the development of a behavioral disorder. Animal cruelty in children is associated with factors such as lack of empathy, poor socioemotional development, or child abuse [ 27 ]. There are macroenvironmental factors such as economic stress, a high unemployment rate, and high crime rates that can lead to parental stress and, therefore, domestic violence, but that are also associated with an increased risk of child animal abuse by not understanding that the animals are sentient beings [ 28 ].

Other authors have found that intimate partners who are violent towards women also often commit acts of abuse against pets [ 7 , 17 , 29 , 30 , 31 ]. In many cases, abusers perpetrate acts of abuse against companion animals to intimidate and exert psychological control over their victims [ 18 , 22 , 32 ]. The incidence of cases of animal cruelty is alarming. A study by Vaughn et al. [ 33 ] found that 2% of 43,000 adults interviewed declared having participated in an act of animal cruelty at some point in their lives.

Today, we have tests that help measure levels of cruelty, empathy, and insensitivity, such as the Animal Cruelty Inventory (ACI) [ 34 ], the Griffith Empathy Measurement (GEM) [ 35 ], and the Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits (ICU) [ 36 ]. However, much work remains to be carried out to promote the well-being of both humans and animals that have been, or still are, victims of abuse or mistreatment, and to develop and implement programs that serve to educate people, treat and correct abusers, and, in the specific case of animal abuse, demand greater participation and responsibility on the part of veterinarians in identifying acts of cruelty. Veterinarians are key because their everyday professional practice brings them into contact with animals that have been victims of non-accidental trauma, neglect, or sexual abuse [ 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 ]. In the same way, the forensic veterinary approach can help to determine the risk the offender represents for other animals and for society [ 13 , 43 ]. Unfortunately, and despite the fact that many schools of veterinary medicine in developed countries have improved their curricula to include courses on animal welfare, a deficiency in training in animal abuse, interpersonal violence, and veterinary forensics in veterinary colleges has been reported [ 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ]. The level of training in animal abuse and the role that veterinarians play in cases of animal abuse are still largely ignored in many countries, especially in Latin America [ 24 ].

The goals of this review are to analyze the literature on the relationship between animal cruelty and interpersonal violence, to describe the current status of animal welfare legislation, and to suggest a one health, one welfare approach, to prevent animal cruelty or acts of violence of any kind.

2. Material and Methods

We searched for relevant articles using PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, and Web of Science. Identification of relevant articles was performed using the following keywords: “animal cruelty”, “animal abuse”, “companion animal abuse”, “children animal abuse”, “animal welfare”, “domestic violence”, “lack of empathy”, “callous-unemotional traits in children”, “animal protection laws”, “one welfare”, “MacDonald triad”, and “veterinary social work”. Included references were articles related to the description of animal abuse and how it is related to domestic violence, the risk factors for the development of animal cruelty in children, and its association to callous-unemotional traits or warning signs that can be used to opportunely detect and prevent domestic violence or other crimes. Likewise, articles about the legislation to protect companion animals, and one health approach programs were also included. There was no settled date of publication to select the articles. The search was conducted in multiple languages (English, Spanish, and Portuguese). The search methodology and the selection of the 179 references used for this review are described in Figure 1 .

Search methodology.

3. Animal Cruelty as an Indicator of Domestic Violence

The connection between domestic violence and animal cruelty has been demonstrated in diverse studies [ 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 ]. Generally, violent criminals have histories of animal abuse at some stage in their lives more often than non-violent criminals [ 5 ]. DeGue and DiLillo [ 46 ] suggest that identifying cruelty against pets is a red flag for domestic violence or violence against children.

The World Health Organization [ 47 ] describes violence as “the deliberate use of physical force or power, whether threatening or effective, against oneself, another person, or a group or community, that causes or has many probabilities to cause injury, death, psychological damage, developmental disorders or deprivation”. Derived from this, Mora-Medina et al. [ 48 ] define the term intrafamily violence as “abuse by a perpetrator towards a victim within the family nucleus”. Abuse of animals is more commonly reported in children who have been exposed to domestic violence [ 8 ]. Similarly, young people who are involved in acts of animal cruelty tend to have an increased risk of perpetrating violent acts against their sentimental partners, loved ones, or older family members [ 49 ]. An analysis by Bright et al. [ 8 ], of interviews of 81,000 juvenile aggressors, found that 466 (0.6% of the total sample) had participated in acts of animal cruelty. It highlighted that 37.6% of the respondents who reported having perpetrated animal abuse committed their first offense before age 12. This finding is similar to those of previous studies, which mention that 76–88% of the homes where animal cruelty occurs also presented cases of abuse against children [ 26 ].

Although the neurobiology of empathy and the effect of violence is not well understood to date, Figure 2 tries to represent the structural and neurobehavioral changes that could explain the development of animal cruelty and its association with domestic violence and lack of empathy. According to the literature, when a person, particularly a child, constantly witnesses domestic violence, apart from the behavioral problems that it entails, children can present difficulty developing empathy or a lack of empathy towards others [ 50 ]. When referring to a lack of empathy, the neurological pathway that involves the brainstem, cerebral cortex, and the limbic system with its representative structures—mPFC, aCC, vmPFC, AMYG, IFG, dlPFC, vmPFC, VTA, STR, and In—participates in developing a person’s emotional state and her/his understanding of those of others, a trait that is modulated by individual differences and person-environment aspects [ 51 , 52 ]. When an individual shows traits such as a lack of empathy, this not only represents a social issue but also involves a potential disruption of the neurobiological pathways of empathy development [ 53 ]. Additionally, it is said that children and adolescents who are exposed to violence can become emotionally desensitized or habituated to violence [ 54 ]. During a process of habituation, some structural changes may cause alterations in the neurotransmitter levels by a reduction in the number of vesicles in the presynaptic neurons and a low concentration in the postsynaptic cleft [ 55 ]. The main neurotransmitters implicated in empathy deficits in children are oxytocin and serotonin [ 52 ], and dysregulation of endogenous opioids and oxytocin has also been suggested as a potential cause for a dysregulated empathic network [ 56 ]. This dysregulation could decrease the transmission of, and responsiveness to, stimuli, whether negative, aversive, or positive [ 55 , 57 ]. As a result of a compromised empathy development, children may be unable to understand the emotions of others or deny that animals are sentient beings [ 58 , 59 ], and these could be possible factors that predispose them to commit acts of animal cruelty.

Association among lack of empathy, habituation to domestic violence, and animal cruelty. aCC: anterior cingulate cortex; AMYG: amygdala; AVP: vasopressin; dlPFC: dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; GLU: glutamate; IFG: inferior frontal gyrus; In: insula; mPFC: medial prefrontal cortex; NT: neurotransmitter; OXT: oxytocin; P4: progesterone; PRL: prolactin; STR: striatum; TPJ: temporoparietal junction; vmPFC: ventromedial prefrontal cortex; VTA: ventral tegmental area.

Companion animals turn into victims of family abuse when the abuser tries to cause fear, intimidation, vengeance, and control over the female partner and children [ 60 ]. Thus, companion animal abuse may be an effective method of coercive control used against women who are very close to their pets [ 61 ]. Even concern for the welfare of a companion animal can affect a victim’s decision making about whether to stay with or leave a violent partner [ 62 ]. In fact, many women who have been victims of abuse refuse to go to shelters because they cannot take their pets, but must leave them at home where they may be at the mercy of abusers [ 20 ] who subject them to cruelty to emotionally harm their victims due to the close bond they share with their pets [ 63 ]. Witnessing violence towards, or the death of, a companion animal, can be traumatic in children highly attached to their pets, causing anxious/depressed symptoms [ 64 , 65 ]. Surveys conducted by Carlisle-Frank et al. [ 66 ] in New York revealed that 53% of domestic violence victims reported having witnessed companion animal abuse. That percentage is similar to that observed by Allen et al. [ 29 ] in Ireland (57%), while Ascione et al.’s [ 16 ] analysis carried out in the state of Utah found that 54% of the victims of abuse interviewed had witnessed violent acts, including malicious killing, involving their pets, and that 67% of the children interviewed while living in shelters reported having seen animal abuse. Table 1 provides a comparison of five regions.

Percentage of domestic violence victims who have witnessed animal abuse in five regions.

In Australia, Volant et al. [ 2 ] interviewed 102 women from various social strata, divided into two groups: those who had experienced domestic violence, and those who had not. All those subjects had companion animals. Of the females in the domestic violence group, 52.9% reported having seen animal abuse by their partners, including kicking, hanging, hitting the animals with objects, breaking their necks, or shooting them with a firearm. In contrast, the women in the group without domestic violence reported 0% cases of domestic animal abuse. Another important observation was that 29% of the women in the domestic violence group reported that their children committed animal abuse, while in the group of women without domestic violence, animal abuse by children occurred in only 1% of cases. Therefore, over half of domestic violence cases reported worldwide include precedents of animal abuse, though Faver and Strand [ 21 ] found a lower prevalence (36%) among Hispanic women who were victims of domestic violence. Similarly, Currie [ 67 ] mentions that children who witness domestic violence have a higher predisposition to perpetuate animal abuse than children who did not grow up in this disrupted environment. Furthermore, when children or adolescents witness animal abuse, they tend to replicate this behavior in the future, both animal abuse, bullying, and juvenile delinquency [ 68 ].

Evidence of this kind shows that violence has a serious social impact inside the family nucleus and that if this environment is not respected by its members, they may find great difficulty in understanding how to live with other beings in their environment. Fortunately, there are indicators that can raise red flags to promptly detect individuals who may be prone to committing some kind of violence. These indicators suggest that violent people may potentially act aggressively towards conspecifics or companion animals, so those behaviors should be taken as warning signs in order to intervene opportunely and prevent additional acts of abuse.

4. Risk Factors for the Development of Animal Cruelty in Children

The prevalence of animal cruelty in children is diverse and, in many countries, still unknown. According to Campbell [ 69 ], 53% of animal abuse in companion animals is perpetrated by adults and 20% is perpetrated by children. Thus, for example, in Italy, Baldry [ 70 ] found that 50% of adolescents committed animal cruelty, while in Australia, 21% has been reported [ 71 ]. The origin of acts of animal cruelty by violent people is an urgent topic for research because it is important to identify situations that may lead a child to commit violent acts against animals. Hartman et al. [ 30 ] examined the relationship between empathy, callous-unemotional traits, and animal abuse in 290 children in the United States aged 7–12 years whose mothers had suffered intimate partner violence. They found that 16.2% had hurt an animal on at least one occasion and concluded that cruelty or insensitivity (callous-unemotional traits) and low empathy could serve as predictors of animal abuse by children. Their report is similar to one by Muñoz et al. [ 72 ], who observed that levels of empathy and cruelty—or callous-unemotional traits—predict antisocial behaviors and could lead to animal abuse by young people. These results are consistent with the findings of a meta-analysis which showed that bullying was negatively associated with cognitive and affective empathy (odds ratio OR = 0.60, OR = 0.51, respectively). Apart from the positive correlation between insensitivity and bullying (OR = 2.55) [ 73 ], the authors stated that children who lack empathy, do not understand emotional traits, and are habituated to witnessing abusive actions, will likely be unable to understand that animals are sentient beings. As a result, their social performance will be poor. Among the risk factors that predispose a child to develop animal abuse at some stage of his life, we can cite having witnessed animal abuse, being victims of physical or sexual abuse, alcoholic or drug addict parents, family dysfunction, or present some behavioral disorder [ 19 , 33 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 ]. In the studies carried out by Baldry [ 78 ], Henry and Sanders [ 79 ], and Walters [ 80 ], a positive correlation between animal abuse and subsequent bullying behavior was found. Tapia [ 81 ] reported that, in addition to bullying, aggression, fights, and robbery can also be present.

Children engaged in animal abuse are more likely to show violent criminal behavior in adulthood, mainly when acts of animal cruelty are recurrent, engage bestiality, involve drowning, choking, burning, and the motive behind animal cruelty is fun [ 68 , 82 , 83 , 84 ]. Empirically, animal abuse has also been related to a tendency towards the emergence of serial killers [ 85 ]. Figure 3 schematizes the correlation that the literature has been found between a suggested escalation of violence where animal abuse and its influencing factors may cause progressive violence and aggression towards conspecifics [ 86 ]. In fact, animal cruelty has been shown to be a component of the behavioral history of psychopaths and serial killers who began their criminal lives with acts of animal abuse as children or adolescents, since callous-unemotional traits and lack of emotional reactivity are considered the precursors of psychopathy development [ 87 ]. In this sense, psychopathy is a neurological disorder characterized by a lack of remorse and empathy, impulsiveness, diminished emotional response to their surroundings, and a higher predisposition to develop criminal behaviors [ 88 ]. Adults and children with psychopathy and callous-unemotional traits lack emotional empathy but preserve the cognitive one [ 89 ]. However, it is considered that the latter represents the affective domain of the multidimensional structure of psychopathy [ 90 ]. Several factors have been shown to influence the development of animal cruelty: e.g., poor parenting, a psychopathic subtype of conduct disorder [ 91 , 92 ], continuously witnessing domestic violence, disruption of the development of empathy, among others [ 5 , 91 ]. The consequences of a lack of empathy and impaired development of conscience are associated with an escalation in violence from animal cruelty to serious offenses, such as sex crimes or murder [ 92 , 93 , 94 ]. Additionally, when an individual is exposed to chronic psychosocial stress, has a trauma history—such as abuse—or emotional dysregulation, neurotransmitters (serotonin, norepinephrine, GABA, glutamate, or acetylcholine), and cortical and subcortical regions (mPFC, aCC, STR, AMYG; THAL, Hyp, etc.) participate in the brain circuitry that regulates aggressive behavior [ 95 ]. Therefore, the promotion of motor aggressive responses towards animals or conspecifics is known to be the result of multisensory cues from the environment [ 96 ].

The origin of childhood animal abuse and the development of interpersonal aggression. aCC: anterior cingulate cortex; Ach: acetylcholine; AMYG: amygdala; Hyp: hypothalamus; mPFC: medial prefrontal cortex; NE: norepinephrine; PAG: periaqueductal gray; STR: striatum; THAL: thalamus.

The risk factors that may predispose children to develop animal abuse at some stage of life include the following: having witnessed animal abuse, being victims of physical and sexual abuse, having alcoholic parents, being raised in a dysfunctional family, being exposed to domestic violence, and presenting a behavioral disorder [ 19 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 ]. According to Baldry’s [ 78 ] evaluation of a sample of 268 boys and 264 girls aged 9–12 from five schools, 44% reported having witnessed episodes of domestic violence. That analysis reported that those children were 3–8 times more likely to have performed acts of animal mistreatment than children who had not witnessed intrafamily violence. These results agree with Henry’s study [ 97 ] of 206 students, 141 of whom had abused animals. The latter group had witnessed animal cruelty before age 13. That study also determined a negative relationship on a scale that measured attitudes and evaluated how animals should be treated (Attitudes Toward the Treatment of Animal Scales, ATTAS) (r = −0.06, p < 0.001). Children who often mistreat animals are commonly abused in the community, at school, and in the family [ 75 , 78 , 98 ]. Other authors mention that there are macro-environmental factors such as disorganization, economic stress, and unemployment that can also influence the relationship between children and animals [ 28 ]. Hence, animal abuse in children is considered a form of dehumanization, where minors are not able to recognize their own pain or the suffering they inflict on others [ 99 ]. Morera et al. [ 100 ] state that, in a dehumanized society, animals are perceived as machines and not sentient beings. If the younger members of society cannot recognize animals as beings that can suffer and feel pain, a circle of violence tends to be repeated in future generations. Children who perform such acts would speak about the instability of society and its deterioration where the child does not understand the importance of living with another being. If these ideas are not corrected, they can be learned by the next generations and, therefore, reflect the advancement or regression of society.

Similarly, nine factors have been identified to explain why humans, especially children, may abuse animals: (1) to have control of them; (2) to get revenge on them; (3) to satisfy prejudices towards a particular species or breed; (4) to show aggression; (5) to impress others by showing them what they are capable of; (6) to amuse bystanders; (7) to retaliate against other people; (8) to avenge a personal aggression by harming someone else’s pet; and (9) to satisfy sadistic tendencies [ 1 , 101 ]. The associated studies stress, of course, that each case must be studied individually considering the person involved and her/his possible social-psychological motivations [ 91 ]. Other authors report that children may also perpetuate cruel actions towards animals out of simple curiosity or by imitating acts they have observed. This may reflect desensitization to violence, low empathy, or the absence of sentimental ties to the victim [ 102 , 103 ]. In the worst cases, children living in a home where intrafamily violence occurs may even kill a pet to save it from suffering torture in the future [ 18 ]. The trend observed to date shows that the main animals that children abuse or mistreat are small animals such as rodents, birds, and reptiles, followed by dogs and cats [ 104 ], though other authors argue that cats and dogs are the most frequent victims [ 16 ]. Animal cruelty directed against anthropomorphized species (dogs and cats), especially in an up-close manner, is a more apt red flag of the development of extreme violence [ 105 ]. In general, boys are twice as likely to be involved in animal cruelty as girls [ 8 , 70 , 75 ]. This could be due, at least in part, to the socialization of boys which often emphasizes dominance and aggression [ 106 ]. This notion is supported by Riggs et al. [ 107 ], who found a statistically significant relationship between the perpetration of acts of animal cruelty and gender ( p < 0.001) which suggests that men were 24% more likely to mistreat animals and perform aggressive acts.

As these studies show, we must understand that multiple factors can influence children to commit acts of animal cruelty, though we can conclude that an inappropriate child-rearing environment and previous exposure to violence will often lead the affected children to normalize acts of cruelty directed towards other living beings. A possible solution to, and prevention of, problems of animal cruelty could consist in having children participate in educational programs at school where they are taught to treat animals with respect, compassion, and kindness [ 108 ].

4.1. Empathy

Empathy is the aptitude to understand the feelings or emotions of other beings; that is, to comprehend what someone else feels in a given situation. Children’s awareness of animal sentience is associated with compassion and humane behaviors towards animals. Thus, considering children’s beliefs about other species in the context of animal abuse can contribute to understanding animal cruelty onset and persistence in childhood [ 109 ]. Authors such as Miralles et al. [ 110 ] mention that empathy towards animals can vary according to their taxonomic order; for example, the difference in comparing empathy that one might feel for a pet dog compared to a reptile. Despite this difference, abusing an animal of any species is a significant act that may be an indicator of a potential abuser. There is proof that the absence of empathy can play a critical role in the appearance of aggressiveness and antisocial behavior in children, adolescents, and adults [ 111 , 112 ]. Two types of empathy have been identified: affective and cognitive. Studies have found that people with antisocial behavior—such as bullying—and distinct levels of psychological pathologies tend to have deficits of affective empathy [ 72 ]. Animal abuse is another form of antisocial behavior and one of the main points of view for diagnosing behavioral disorders.

A possible link between a low degree of empathy and animal abuse was recently demonstrated in studies by, for example, Plant et al. [ 113 ]. Those authors studied children aged 13–17 from two cultures to analyze factors that are involved in the appearance of animal abuse. They found that 10–57% of those children had witnessed family violence and animal cruelty and had developed a negative relationship between the presence of animal abuse and affective empathy (OR = 0.19, p < 0.001). A similar result was obtained by Hawkins et al. [ 114 ], who conducted an exploratory study of 540 people from all six continents. They found a positive correlation between low empathy towards animals and the potential for performing acts of abuse. Although the evidence currently available is not conclusive on this relationship, there seems to be little doubt that the inability to understand the emotions that other beings feel when subjected to violence can be considered a primary red flag for detecting possible abusers.

4.2. Callous-Unemotional Traits

Cruelty and insensitivity refer to behaviors that demonstrate an absence of guilt or empathy in individuals who use others for their personal gain [ 115 ]. Cruelty and insensitivity are classified as callous-unemotional traits that can be understood as the antonym of empathy [ 116 ]. Individuals with these qualities are unable to recognize stress or discomfort in others [ 117 ]. In this context, Zhang et al. [ 118 ] analyzed the link between antisocial traits in 176 children aged 4–5 years. They observed a negative association between prosocial insensitivity and behavioral traits (r 2 = −0.57, p < 0.01), but a positive correlation with behavioral problems such as aggression (r 2 = 0.24–0.67, p < 0.05). Likewise, a study by Fanti [ 119 ] found that adolescents who presented insensitivity traits showed a high probability of manifesting behavioral problems such as impulsivity, narcissism, aggressiveness, and inattention.

Insensitivity traits are a factor of great interest in psychology because some studies sustain that a relationship exists between the presence of these antisocial behavioral traits in children and tendencies towards aggression, criminality, psychopathic behaviors [ 36 , 120 ], and acts of animal abuse. According to Frick and Ray [ 121 ], these are behaviors that are known to occur in the life trajectories of psychopaths. This line of research has led to the elaboration of insensitivity tests. When detected in an early stage, insensitive behaviors may make it possible to predict which individuals might commit acts of aggression against animals or other people [ 122 ].

The foregoing emphasizes that insensitivity is a particularly important trait that may generate evident signs that help determine whether a child or adolescent will be capable of performing acts of abuse towards animals that could later evolve into acts of aggression against people or crimes on a larger scale.

5. Warning Signs of the Potential for Domestic Violence and Animal Abuse

Scientific evidence shows an association between domestic violence and animal mistreatment. For example, children raised in home environments where violence is common tend to develop abusive and aggressive temperaments. Children from households with domestic violence who have perpetuated acts of animal abuse with their pets, exposed to interpersonal violence, and acts of animal abuse tend to normalize physical punishment in animals [ 123 ]. Animal abuse by children is a sensitive issue due to evidence that indicates that aggression towards animals during childhood could be an early indicator of the future development of violent tendencies [ 30 , 124 ]. According to Mead [ 26 ], animal cruelty in children is a behavior that can be diagnosed and treated early to prevent the development of violent behavior, or even homicidal tendencies, later in life. Table 2 summarizes the warning signs that have been correlated with interpersonal violence.

Studies investigating warning signs to identify and prevent interpersonal (domestic or community violence).

As mentioned above, lack of empathy is a characteristic that has been strongly associated with psychopathic behavior, but it is also symptomatic of other conditions, such as hyperactivity syndrome and related behavioral disorders [ 136 , 137 ]. This means that additional, specific traits must be defined to determine whether domestic violence is the root of other expressions of violence. On this topic, Rigdon and Tapia [ 127 ] studied 18 children who had participated in animal abuse. They found that they all manifested antisocial behaviors: lack of temper control, bullying, destructive tendencies, compulsive lying, and cruelty to other children and animals. MacDonald [ 15 , 138 ] has analyzed the topic of animal cruelty extensively. He affirms that three behaviors during childhood may be keys to predicting acts of violence against humans: (1) animal cruelty; (2) secondary enuresis (bedwetting) after the age of 5; and (3) pyromania, these factors are associated with the emotional stress caused by traumatic events that children below age 5 may experience. Recognizing them offers a potential intervention point for prompt management to promote empathy for, and respect towards, other living beings [ 125 , 138 ]. Research has determined that adult pyromaniacs, sexual sadists, and serial killers tend to present this triad at young ages [ 126 ].

A study of 280 people who had committed murder produced evidence that validated an association with McDonald’s triad, though it added that physical and psychological abuse by parents was also prevalent in these individuals [ 27 ]. Similarly, Walters [ 139 ] performed a multiple regression analysis on 496 sex offenders to determine whether animal cruelty and pyromania can be confirmed as markers of fearlessness and disinhibition. He found that animal cruelty is closely related to loss of fear (r = 0.20), while pyromania correlated with disinhibition (r = 0.17). Studies of this kind confirm the applicability of McDonald’s triad as a tool for detecting signs of potential abuse in children; however, studies of these psychosocial disorders must consider numerous factors to avoid reaching misleading interpretations [ 22 ].

In Figure 4 , the components of the McDonald triad and how they can be related are shown. As marked in previous sentences, animal cruelty is associated with an escalation of violence and could be used as an early predictor of interpersonal violence and further abusive acts [ 124 , 140 ]. Firstly, apart from the sociopsychological alterations than can be observed in these children, Teicher et al. [ 141 ] have found that childhood maltreatment—including verbal abuse, witnessing domestic violence, and childhood sexual abuse—can have potential effects on brain development, particularly in the structure and functionality of the grey matter (reducing its volume), the inferior longitudinal fasciculus (reducing its integrity), and the somatosensory cortex (reducing the thickness of the cortex). Likewise, young adults witnessing domestic violence were found to show an altered visual-limbic pathway and, therefore, alteration in the integration of emotional experiences [ 142 ]. The exposition to stressful or traumatic events during early childhood, such as abuse or domestic violence, is known to have a stronger association with bedwetting, where evidence also mentions the role of cortisol—secreted after stressful events—and its involvement in nocturnal polyuria [ 143 , 144 ]. Finally, pyromania, or fire-setting, is a characteristic that has been reported in individual victims of neglectful parenting, as well as those with affective disorders [ 145 ], where a lack of empathy and the altered limbic system circuits can influence, although the contributions of cognitive and affective empathy are still not well understood [ 146 ].

McDonald triad consists of bedwetting (nocturnal enuresis), pyromania, and animal abuse. ADH: antidiuretic hormone: GMC: gray matter concentration.

Nonetheless, some studies have also highlighted the lack of association between the so-called McDonald triad with violence. In a study by Parfitt et al. [ 147 ], the authors stated that the validity of the triad is controversial and cannot always be applied for the prompt recognition and prevention of interpersonal violence since each of the factors can occur on its own and develop antisocial behaviors and because the simultaneous presentation of the three elements is a rare event in children. Similarly, Joubert et al. [ 148 ] mention the inconsistency of distinguishing the three markers to identify potential sex offenders in a study carried out in the United States where, for example, more than half of the individuals did not experience enuresis during childhood or adolescence, and some did not show any of the three elements. Therefore, although the McDonald triad is often associated with antisocial and aggressive traits, the presentation of one or two markers is common, and they can be a result of multiple contexts and needs to be addressed in a broader perspective [ 149 ].

Beirne [ 9 ] defines bestiality as an interspecies sexual assault in which the human penis is introduced into an animal’s vagina, anus, or cloaca. This act causes pain and suffering to the animal but cannot be reported because the victims—non-human animals—cannot express themselves verbally. During the act, the perpetrator has a sense of domination over the animal [ 150 ]. We need to clarify that bestiality differs from zoophilia since it does not contemplate the motivations that may lead a person to seek sexual contact with an animal [ 128 , 151 ]. A more appropriate definition of bestiality, therefore, could be animal sexual abuse [ 152 ]. Whichever term is used, bestiality may also be a red flag for the development of violent behaviors and a precursor to interpersonal violence in adults [ 133 ]. It has been reported that humans who perform bestiality lack empathy, are insecure, and tend to be ashamed or afraid of rejection [ 10 ].

Statistics have shown that 8% of men in the United States admit to having had some type of sexual contact with animals. Of those, 40–50% lived on rural farms [ 129 ]. A study by Hensley et al. [ 131 ] found that of 261 convicts in correctional facilities in the southern U.S., 16 said they had committed acts of bestiality as children. Henderson et al. [ 93 ] reported similar results in a sample of 180 prisoners in a different prison, where 1 in 5 admitted to having performed sexual acts with animals. The scientific literature affirms that bestiality is another warning sign that correlates with violent acts towards adults and children [ 132 ]. Fleming et al.’s [ 130 ] study of 24 young people who had performed acts of bestiality found that 23 had participated in sexual assaults against humans. Edwards [ 153 ] also reported this association. His analysis of sexual predators arrested in 2003–2017 observed that 2.6% had antecedents of participating in bestiality and that those individuals were significantly more prone to have been victims of child sexual violence ( p < 0.005), to have engaged in animal cruelty ( p < 0.0001), and to have committed child sexual abuse ( p < 0.005).

A psychological evaluation of an 18-year-old male with antecedents of child sexual abuse found an absence of cognitive dysfunction and average intelligence but active psychopathology, but other tests revealed that he was emotionally and sexually immature, suffered from attachment disorders and a lack of empathy, and had little self-discipline and lower than normal sensitivity to criticism. This male had not shown any feeling of guilt or remorse associated with the death of a calf and admitted to the heterosexual practice which listed the case in the category of bestiality [ 154 ]. Evidence of this kind shows a clear connection between animal cruelty and interpersonal violence, though no link between interpersonal violence and bestiality has yet been established [ 155 ]. Bestiality may be a prelude to later sexual offenses, but the evidence available today does not show it to be a conclusive factor (though it often includes elements of MacDonald’s triad). For now, it is mentioned as a potential triggering factor for future violence.

6. Animal Cruelty and Animal Protection Laws

Since the 17th century, animal cruelty has been the justification for enacting laws to foster animal welfare. In the Middle Ages, Saint Francis of Assisi preached those animals are our brothers and sisters. In 1635 in Ireland, in 1641 in Massachusetts, and in 1659 in the United Kingdom, animal protection laws were passed due to concerns over slaughtering processes. However, it was not until 1822 that the first law enacted to prevent violent or cruel acts and practices towards livestock was ratified [ 156 ]. It did not, however, mention the term “animal cruelty” for it still considered animals to be property, not sentient beings. Gradually, a corpus of law designed to regulate the treatment of animals and impose penalties for these types of crimes was established [ 128 ]. One of the pioneering legislators in the battle to prevent animal cruelty was Henry Bergh, who founded and chaired the American Society for the Prevention of Animal Cruelty (ASPCA). In 1867, the ASPCA incorporated the term “animal cruelty” into the laws of New York to describe offenses against animals that deserved punishment. This served as an example for several states of the American Union, such as Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Illinois, and New Hampshire, all of which proceeded to enact laws against animal cruelty [ 157 ].

Currently, the Society for the Prevention of Animal Cruelty has locations worldwide, with offices in Africa, Asia, India, Europe, North America, and Oceania. Particularly North America, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand are the regions with a high degree of animal legislation to protect companions, farm animals, and wildlife, and enforce its application throughout the countries [ 158 ]. Regardless, some gaps have been recognized. For example, in Australia, animal welfare is not included in the national constitution; every state is responsible for establishing legislation in their territory, where the lack of uniform federal legislation regarding animal protection causes shortcomings, such as the lack of definition of what is considered an animal and the penalties to reinforce the law [ 159 ]. The inconsistency in the use of particular terms such as “animal”, “suffering”, or “harm” is also seen in European countries, where the application of the law depends on the interpretation of the lawyer when there are unclear terminologies in the legislation [ 160 ]. Although the European Union recognizes animals as sentient beings that can feel pain and suffer, this is only legally appointed in the civil codes of France, Austria, Germany, Switzerland, and Catalonia [ 161 ].

In the case of Asia, countries such as China have changed their attitude towards animals, mainly companion animals, considering them from a humanistic and moralistic point of view instead of as valuable resources thanks to animal welfare courses. However, political or cultural aspects are the main reasons why rigorous animal laws are difficult to implement nationally [ 162 ]. The differences between countries depend on the sociopolitical, religious, economic, and cultural aspects [ 158 ]. In regions where Islamicists and Muslims are guided by religious beliefs, dogs are perceived differently. While dogs can be considered pets and eating their meat is prohibited, they can also be recognized as animals used exclusively for guarding and hunting, while cats, fishes, and birds are broadly accepted as companion animals [ 163 ].

In Latin America, animal protection programs and laws are minimal, although interest in preserving animal welfare has been growing. Brazil, Peru, Costa Rica, Colombia, Uruguay, and Mexico have laws, a draft of a law, or official norms that protect companion animals from cruelty acts. In Mexico, the Animal Protection Law aims to guarantee the well-being of companion animals, preventing cruelty and providing respectful treatment of animals [ 164 ]. However, although the commitment and desire of these countries to reinforce animal welfare laws, corruption, economic situation, and cultural variables determine the success of the legislation [ 158 ].

To cover these deficiencies, animal protection laws were modified throughout the 19th century as additional acts came to be considered animal abuse or cruelty; for example, not providing food, water, shelter, or veterinary services to companion animals, mutilations, bestiality, beatings, malicious killing, and any situation that causes pain or suffering. In many cases, fines and sanctions were established to punish these crimes [ 134 ]. Much remains to be done, however, to improve animal protection laws because many do not define the term animal, have confusing wording, or leave gaps. Finally, the punishments and fines imposed tend to be insufficient or difficult to apply [ 165 ]. Additionally, because these laws are written by humans, they do not necessarily favor animals as they should [ 166 ]. One way to approach this problem is to encourage laws with veterinary guidance. As professionals on animal health, veterinarians must be part of the authorities in charge of constructing animal cruelty laws so that it is possible to address the problem from a perspective based on medical knowledge and animal welfare science [ 167 ]. With this objective, courses focusing on animals’ legal rights or animal law must be promoted in school curriculums [ 168 ]. Moreover, measures to guarantee the application of laws and that the punishment, charges, or penalties for animal abusers are also being covered are needed [ 169 ].

In the connection between domestic violence and animal abuse, although domestic violence laws have expanded in recent decades, the law in most regions ignores the participation and vulnerability of animals in a violent environment. Traditionally, animals have been barred from most domestic violence shelters, making it difficult for victims to leave violent homes [ 170 , 171 ]. In the same way, some efforts have been made in order to understand the socioeconomic factors related to animal abuse in the family environment, and animals are excluded from social programs [ 172 ]. Despite this, some programs have been developed to house victimized humans and animals. The legislation of a few states of the United States incorporates animal abuse into domestic violence provisions and protective orders [ 63 , 173 ].

7. One Health, One Welfare Approach

Research on the connection between animal cruelty and other forms of violence has led to significant policy changes in the USA. These include upgrading certain acts of animal abuse to felonies, allowing pets to be included on domestic violence protection orders, identifying animal cruelty as an element of domestic violence, mandating or allowing cross reporting by social services professionals and animal service agencies, referencing animal cruelty in court decisions regarding parental rights, enhancing penalties for exposing children to animal cruelty, and adding animal cruelty to the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) and National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) [ 42 , 46 ]. However, in most regions, there is still a lack of attention to animal abuse within family violence because of the assignment of functions [ 42 ]. Human protective services are primarily a function of the government social and health institutions, while animal welfare services belong to the private human societies or public environment.

Diverse studies point out the importance of maintaining an interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary approach in the timely recognition of domestic violence, from a public health perspective [ 174 , 175 , 176 , 177 ]. Such is the case of the professional practice of the dentist, since, on many occasions, it is in the mouth where signs of physical violence can be detected [ 178 , 179 ], or of veterinarians when detecting animal abuse [ 70 , 166 , 167 ], which has been closely related to the tendency to develop criminal acts later [ 68 ]. Training and awareness are essential for health professionals, their position to face intrafamily violence and hence the importance of carrying out more research and programs for this purpose, as well as systematic and effective actions with the purpose of humanizing and taking care of the health of mistreated people [ 152 ].

Early life humane education and animal-assisted programs are considered an option to promote childhood awareness of the importance of empathy, kindness, and love towards animals and people [ 180 ]. The main goal of these education programs is to build a sense of empathy and teach compassion within and outside families [ 181 ]. Humane educators with a greater tendency to show kindness and welfare-orientated attitudes constitute a positive approach for schools to instill these traits in young people [ 182 ]. Similarly, animal-assisted psychotherapy with species such as equines has shown to help children involved in traumatic experiences including domestic violence [ 183 ]. When children learn to take care of animals and treat them kindly, they tend to do the same with conspecifics and will show respect to every sentient being, which may help in reducing animal and human violence [ 184 ].

As the National Institute of Health states, the major recommendation is to prevent children from developing callous-unemotional behaviors [ 181 ]. However, to date, the participation of adolescents and adults in animal-based programs is encouraged, particularly in prisons, where animals such as rescue dogs are a form of treatment and rehabilitation, serving to reduce the rate of violence and suicide attempts inside these institutions [ 185 ]. Additionally, education with animals has physical (e.g., weight loss), psychological (e.g., reduces stress), social (e.g., social intelligence), behavioral, and environmental benefits for the inmate, their family, animals, and society [ 186 ]. For example, the jail-based course Parenting, Prison, and Pups has shown to be an effective parenting therapy for mothers housed in jails to correct and develop a nourishing relationship with their children [ 187 ]. As we have seen, if children grow up in healthy and positive environments where they are taught the importance of human and animal care, the likelihood of developing negative behaviors is reduced.

Likewise, fostering empathy is linked to people’s prosocial functioning [ 188 ], including volunteering, helping, and reacting sensitively to animals, humans, and the environment [ 180 , 189 , 190 ]. A one health, one welfare approach is a set of multidisciplinary actions and systems that promote human health and well-being, animal welfare, human–animal relationships, and environmental protection [ 191 , 192 , 193 , 194 , 195 ]. Therefore, it is essential to form a network of veterinarians, human healthcare professionals, local social services, legal experts, and academics from related fields to enhance the awareness, identification, and intervention plans for the cycle of animal abuse and domestic violence [ 184 , 189 , 190 , 192 , 193 , 194 , 195 ].

8. Conclusions

Animal cruelty is intimately associated with domestic violence and represents another form of abuse that may accompany harmful treatment of children or romantic partners and forms of psychological abuse and intimidation. Likewise, animal abuse and domestic violence are considered predecessors of criminal and violent traits in humans that require prompt attention. The indicators described by MacDonald have demonstrated their validity for the early identification of potentially violent individuals. The correlation among pyromania, secondary enuresis, and animal cruelty is clear, but we can now add a lack of empathy and the tendency to escalate to even crueler acts, such as child abuse or even murder. The factors that influence manifestations of violent behavior towards humans and animals are often linked to violent domestic environments. When children are raised in environments where aggression and abuse are part of the daily routine, it can alter the way in which they socialize with others. Moreover, indicators such as insensitivity and poor social skills must be considered as elements of any strategic plan designed to prevent or correct animal abuse in children.

One of the approaches recommended to prevent animal abuse and cruelty in children and teenagers is early childhood education. Teaching children to be more humane, compassionate, and respectful towards living beings can help reduce all types of violence. However, there is much room for improvement in promoting the well-being of humans and animals that have been, or are currently, victims of abuse or cruelty. Teaching programs and laws are needed to encourage and educate society, but veterinarians must also take on an active role in the process of identifying and preventing animal abuse.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.M.-R., S.M., K.L.-G. and R.d.C.M.G.; investigation, D.M.-R., S.M., K.L.-G., A.D.-O., R.d.C.M.G., R.R.-N. and P.M.-M.; writing—original draft preparation, D.M.-R., S.M., R.d.C.M.G., A.D.-O. and K.L.-G.; writing—review and editing, D.M.-R., S.M. and R.d.C.M.G.; project administration, D.M.-R., P.M.-M., S.M. and R.d.C.M.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Home / Essay Samples / Sociology / Animal Cruelty / Animal Abuse And Cruelty

Animal Abuse And Cruelty

• Category: Sociology , Social Issues
• Topic: Animal Cruelty , Animal Testing , Society

Pages: 3 (1436 words)

Views: 2509

• Downloads: -->

Works Cited:

--> ⚠️ Remember: This essay was written and uploaded by an--> click here.

Found a great essay sample but want a unique one?

are ready to help you with your essay

You won’t be charged yet!

Rhetorical Strategies Essays

Propaganda Essays

Public Speaking Essays

Communication Skills Essays

First Impression Essays

Related Essays

We are glad that you like it, but you cannot copy from our website. Just insert your email and this sample will be sent to you.

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service  and  Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Your essay sample has been sent.

In fact, there is a way to get an original essay! Turn to our writers and order a plagiarism-free paper.

samplius.com uses cookies to offer you the best service possible.By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .--> -->