No internet connection.
All search filters on the page have been cleared., your search has been saved..
- Sign in to my profile My Profile
Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research
- By: Jerome Kirk & Marc L. Miller
- Publisher: SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Series: Qualitative Research Methods
- Publication year: 1986
- Online pub date: January 01, 2011
- Discipline: Anthropology
- Methods: Validity , Reliability , Measurement
- DOI: https:// doi. org/10.4135/9781412985659
- Keywords: natural sciences , reliability and validity , social science , social scientists , sociology , tradition Show all Show less
- Print ISBN: 9780803924703
- Online ISBN: 9781412985659
- Buy the book icon link
Kirk and Miller define what is -- and what is not -- qualitative research. They suggest that the use of numbers in the process of recording and analyzing observations is less important than that the research should involve sustained interaction with the people being studied, in their own language and on their own turf. Following a chapter on objectivity, the authors discuss the role of reliability and validity and the problems that arise when these issues are neglected. They present a paradigm for the qualitative research process that makes it possible to pursue validity without neglecting reliability.
Front Matter
- Series Introduction
- Editors' Introduction
- Objectivity in Qualitative Research
- Reliability and Validity
- The Problem of Validity
- Toward Theoretical Validity
- The Problem of Reliability
- Ethnographic Decision Making: The Four Phases of Qualitative Research
Back Matter
- About the Authors
- Qualitative Research Methods
Sign in to access this content
Get a 30 day free trial, more like this, sage recommends.
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches
- Sign in/register
Navigating away from this page will delete your results
Please save your results to "My Self-Assessments" in your profile before navigating away from this page.
Sign in to my profile
Please sign into your institution before accessing your profile
Sign up for a free trial and experience all Sage Learning Resources have to offer.
You must have a valid academic email address to sign up.
Get off-campus access
- View or download all content my institution has access to.
Sign up for a free trial and experience all Sage Learning Resources has to offer.
- view my profile
- view my lists
Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser .
Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.
- We're Hiring!
- Help Center
Download Free PDF
Reliability and Validity of Qualitative and Operational Research Paradigm
2008, Pakistan Journal of Statistics and Operation Research
Related papers
With reference to definitions of validity and reliability, and drawing extensively on conceptualisations of qualitative research, this essay examines the correlation between the reliability of effort to find answers to questions about the social world, and the validity of conclusions drawn from such attempts. This is to point out the fundamental position to the role of theory in relation to research; as an inductivist strategy qualitative research tries to confer the correspondence between reality and representation. The problem of validity and reliability in qualitative research is entwined with the definition of qualitative research and the possibility to mirror this in practice to make a qualitative research properly valid and reliable. That presents both challenges and chances to qualitative researchers; yet, with taking into consideration qualitative criteria in social research, achieving validity and as well as reliability in qualitative research is not impossible.
In general practice, qualitative research contributes as significantly as quantitative research and both try to find the same result; the truth. Qualitative research, also known as naturalistic inquiry, evolved inside the social and human sciences refers to theories on interpretation and human experience. The use of validity and reliability are common in quantitative research and currently, there are ongoing debates regarding whether the terms are appropriate to evaluate qualitative studies. Although there is no universally typical terminology and standards used to measure qualitative studies, all qualitative researchers comprise strategies to enhance the credibility of a study throughout the research design and implementation. The main aim of this article is to provide the concepts of validity and reliability and to ascertain that it is possible for qualitative research to be properly valid or reliable.
Evidence-based nursing, 2015
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
The rejection of reliability and validity in qualitative inquiry in the 1980s has resulted in an interesting shift for “ensuring rigor” from the investigator's actions during the course of the research, to the reader or consumer of qualitative inquiry. The emphasis on strategies that are implemented during the research process has been replaced by strategies for evaluating trustworthiness and utility that are implemented once a study is completed. In this article, we argue that reliability and validity remain appropriate concepts for attaining rigor in qualitative research. We argue that qualitative researchers should reclaim responsibility for reliability and validity by implementing verification strategies integral and self-correcting during the conduct of inquiry itself. This ensures the attainment of rigor using strategies inherent within each qualitative design, and moves the responsibility for incorporating and maintaining reliability and validity from external reviewers&#...
Journal of Semitic Studies, 2024
In addition to reflexes of Proto-Semitic *timāli, the Semitic languages use a variety of innovative words meaning 'yesterday', as well as numerous different words and phrases used to mean 'the day before yesterday' and sometimes even earlier days. This article examines these various adverbs or adverbial phrases in the diverse Semitic languages, both ancient and modern, coming from a variety of semantic developments, some of which are typologically unusual.
Onderwijs dat, terwijl het beter kan, bij grote groepen jeugdigen halvabetisme voortbrengt, is onrecht. Want het bewerkstelligt onnodig ongelijkheid. Alleen al hierom. Hetzelfde geldt voor onderwijs dat onvoldoende werk maakt van andere elementaire vaardigheden zoals rekenen en denken. Geïllustreerd aan ervaringen met medische zorg en met openbaar bestuur en rechtspraak.
Archaeopress Publishing Ltd eBooks, 2022
Much has been written in the last thirty or forty years on the subject of prehistoric rock art in the United Kingdom and its presumed place in the wider archaeological context and in the lives of prehistoric people. Traditionally, picking up from much earlier Victorian ‘antiquarian’ studies, these began as mere catalogues locating and describing in detail the carvings on each rock, eventually moving on to attempts to decipher the symbols themselves. But what soon became apparent is that more often than not rock art did not exist in splendid isolation but in conjunction with many other monuments and structures of the period, in particular burials, variously described as ‘barrows’ or ‘cairns’ in the literature. Rock art was part of a wider palimpsest of prehistoric remains in the landscape. It is no great surprise that a stretch of land that offered what prehistoric people sought – a home, a place with fresh water and supplies of plant and animal food, to live and shelter, to raise a family, to grow crops and look after livestock, and to bury and honour their dead – would remain attractive for many hundreds, if not thousands, of years. But recent improvements in dating techniques, particularly the growth in secure radiocarbon dates with increasingly narrow date ranges, have begun to show that rock art was not merely and fortuitously in the same place as other remains but could now be proved to be contemporary with them. It made renewed sense, therefore, to talk about a complete ‘prehistoric landscape’, characterised by rock art in the form of cup-and-ringmarked rocks, burials, cairnfields, enclosures and other prehistoric remains all of which could safely be dated to the same period – namely the Late Neolithic/Early Bronze Age. But the reappraisal and recognition of such landscapes have yet to examine every example and there is one such example in Yorkshire rich in the remains of the period for which there are no records of modern examination apart from a single desultory excavation of a small cairn in the 1980s. Less well known than and to some extent in the archaeological shade of its more celebrated and illustrious neighbour, Ilkley Moor, directly to the west and like that moor taking its name from the parish within which it sits, Burley-inWharfedale, is Burley Moor. A typical stretch of gritstone heather-covered grouse moorland, it forms the extreme NE flank of what is more properly called Rombalds Moor, a 78 squarekilometre area of moorland lying between the valleys of the Rivers Aire to the south and Wharfe to the north in West Yorkshire.
The Person and the Challenges. The Journal of Theology, Education, Canon Law and Social Studies Inspired by Pope John Paul II, 2013
Classical World, 2020
Journal of Pragmatics, 2009
Zenodo, 2024
Güneş Işıksel and Emmanuel Szurek (eds.), Turcs et Français. Une histoire culturelle 1860-1960, Rennes, Presses Universitaires de Rennes, 2014, pp. 371-378., 2014
JMNKJMKMK, 2018
Psicologia clinica dello sviluppo, 2001
Diacronie: Studi di Storia Contemporanea, 2022
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2006
Epidemiology: Open Access, 2016
Hematological Oncology, 2021
Journal of Science and Technology of the Arts, 2015
Springer eBooks, 2013
The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, 2013
Frontiers in Psychology, 2018
American Journal of Transplantation, 2017
Related topics
- We're Hiring!
- Help Center
- Find new research papers in:
- Health Sciences
- Earth Sciences
- Cognitive Science
- Mathematics
- Computer Science
- Academia ©2024
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Reliability and validity remain appropriate concepts for attaining rigor in qualitative research. Qualitative researchers have to salvage responsibility for reliability and validity by...
This article discusses the use of reliability and validity in the qualitative research paradigm. In the first section of this article, the meanings of quantitative and
Reliability and validity remain appropriate concepts for attaining rigor in qualitative research. Qualitative researchers have to salvage responsibility for reliability and validity by implementing verification strategies integral and self-correcting during the conduct of inquiry itself.
Within the rational paradigm, criteria can be formulated in terms of internal validity, external validity, reliability, and objectivity. Within the naturalistic paradigm, one is better to speak of criteria such as “credibility,” “fittingness,” and “confirmability.”
(2008) Bashir et al. Pakistan Journal of Statistics and Operation Research. Both qualitative and quantitative paradigms try to find the same result; the truth. Qualitative studies are tools used in understanding and describing the world of human experience.
Following a chapter on objectivity, the authors discuss the role of reliability and validity and the problems that arise when these issues are neglected. They present a paradigm for the qualitative research process that makes it possible to pursue validity without neglecting reliability.
The author rejects a strict need for reliability and validity as traditionally defined in quantitative research and outlines a less restrictive approach to ensuring reliability and validity in qualitative research.
This paper is an attempt to clarify the meaning and use of reliability and validity in the qualitative research paradigm.
This article addresses issues relating to rigour within qualitative research, beginning with the need for rigour at all in such studies. The concept of reliability is then analysed, establishing the traditional understanding of the term, and evaluating alternative terms.
With reference to definitions of validity and reliability, and drawing extensively on conceptualisations of qualitative research, this essay examines the correlation between the reliability of effort to find answers to questions about the social world, and the validity of conclusions drawn from such attempts.