(95% CI)
A total of 7 (five published and two unpublished) studies with 2787 women were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the pooled prevalence of family planning utilization among women with disabilities in Ethiopia. Accordingly, the overall estimated pooled prevalence of family planning utilization among women with disabilities with a random effects model was 29.57% (95% CI: 22.30, 36.83) with a heterogeneity index (I 2 ) of 94.6% (p = 0.000) ( Fig 2 ).
To check for publication bias, a funnel plot and Egger’s test [ 37 ] were used. The statistical significance of publication bias was determined using a p-value less than 0.05 [ 38 ]. Accordingly, the funnel plot results revealed a symmetrical pattern, indicating that the included studies do not have a publishing bias ( Fig 3 ). Furthermore, Egger’s regression test is not significant, indicating that there was no publication bias in the studies ( Table 2 ).
Std.Eff | Coef. | Std. Err. | T | p> t | [95% Conf. Interval] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Slope | 3.587349 | 0.7756355 | 4.63 | 0.006 | 1.593514,5.581183 |
Bias | -0.1038034 | 0.3440247 | -0.30 | 0.775 | -0.988147,0.7805403 |
Significant heterogeneity was observed among included primary studies. To identify the source of heterogeneity, sub-group analysis was performed based on the region and year of study. As a result, the overall prevalence of family planning utilization was found to be high in Addis Ababa region studies [32.61, (26.39, 38.82)] ( Fig 4A ) and studies conducted after 2015 [32.61, (26.39, 38.82)] ( Fig 4B ).
A. Subgroup analysis based on the region among women with disability in Ethiopia. B. Subgroup analysis based on year of study among women with disability in Ethiopia.
A leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was done to check the effect of individual studies on the pooled estimate of family planning utilization. The result indicated removing a single study did not have a significant influence on pooled prevalence and the pooled prevalence of family planning utilization was observed low at 25.63% (3.93, 167.08%) and high at 31.78% (5.22, 193.66%) when Abera S. and Beyene GA, et al. were omitted respectively ( Table 3 ).
Study omitted | Year of study | Pooled estimate (%) | 95%CI |
---|---|---|---|
Yesgat YM, et al. | 2019 | 28.03 | 4.68,167.89 |
Mekonnen AG, et al. | 2019 | 29.56 | 4.8, 182.05 |
Beyene GA, et al. | 2013 | 31.79 | 5.22, 193.66 |
Yimer AS, et al. | 2017 | 28.42 | 4.82, 167.02 |
Abera S (upulished) | 2016 | 25.63 | 3.93, 167.08 |
Tilahun A (upulished) | 2020 | 28.62 | 5.13, 159.65 |
Tsegay K, et al. | 2013 | 29.09 | 4.51, 187.48 |
Nine variables (age, marital status, discussion with partner, kowledge on FP methods, presence of FP providing nearby health facility, women’s educational status, economic status, decision maker to use FP methods, and health facility keep the confidentiality & privacy) were extracted to identify factors associated with family planning utilization among women with disability. Of this marital status, discussion with a partner marital status, kowledge on FP methods, presence of FP providing nearby health facility, economic status, decision maker to use FP methods, and health facility keep the confidentiality & privacy were found to be significantly associated with family planning utilization among WWDs ( Table 4 ). However, there was no statistically significant association between women’s age, educational status and FP utilization.
Determinants | Comparisons | Number of studies | Sample size | OR(95% CI) | P- value | I (%) | Heterogeneity test (P- value) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Marital Status | married Vs. unmarried | 3 | 1662 | 11.15 (4.82‒11.98) | 0.003 | 66.2 | <0.001 |
Age | <25 Vs. ≥ 25 | 2 | 593 | 3.21 (1.01‒10.18) | <0.001 | 93.8 | 0.021 |
Discussion with partner | Yes Vs. No | 2 | 649 | 2.49 (1.76‒3.51) | 0.301 | 6.5 | 0.012 |
Kowledge o FP methods | Good Vs. Poor | 2 | 735 | 1.77 (1.22–2.56) | 0.003 | 0 | 0.383 |
Presence of FP providing nearby Health facility | Yes Vs. No | 2 | 698 | 1.49 (0.03–69.71) | 0.837 | 96.9 | <0.001 |
Educational Status | Illiterate Vs. Literate | 1 | 267 | 1.81 (0.92–3.59) | 0.088 | 0 | <0.001 |
Economic status | Poor Vs. Rich | 1 | 267 | 6.66 (2.94–15.05) | <0.001 | 0 | - |
Decision maker to use family planning | Husband Vs. Women | 1 | 162 | 0.08 (0.03–0.21) | <0.001 | 0 | - |
Health Workers keep the confidentiality & privacy | Yes Vs. No | 1 | 536 | 5.14 (3.13–8.43) | <0.001 | 100 | - |
*Significant level <0.05.
The pooled effect of the marital status on FP utilization among women with disabilities was evaluated by using three primary studies (21,24,27) The result of this study revealed that marital status was significantly associated with FP utilization and the likelihood of utilizing FP was 8.6 times higher among those women who had in marital union than their counterparts [OR: 8.63; 95% CI (3.17, 23.46); P<0.001], with heterogeneity (I 2 = 91.5%, p-value <0.001) ( Fig 5 ).
To determine the pooled effects of women’s discussions with their partners on FP utilization, two studies were included [ 25 , 26 ]. The findings revealed that women’s discussion with their partners was significantly associated with the use of FP; those who discussed with their partner were 6 times more likely to use FP than those who did not [OR: 6.08; 95% CI (1.64, 22.53); P = 0.007] with heterogeneity (I 2 = 84.2%, p-value = 0.012) ( Fig 6 ).
A total of two primary studies [ 21 , 22 ] were included to assess the association between knowledge on FP and utilization of FP among women with disabilities. Accordingly, women who had good knowledge were 1. 77 times more likely to utilize FP than those who had poor kowledge [OR = 1. 77, 95% CI = (1.22, 2.56); P = 0.003] with a mild type of heterogeneity between two variables (I 2 = 0.0%, p value = 0.383) ( Fig 7 ) .
The finding of this study revealed that the economic status were significantly associated with FP utilization among women with disabilities [ 23 ] and the likelihood of utilizing FP service were 6.66 times higher in those mothers who had rich economic status [OR = 6.66, 95% (CI = 2.94,15.05); P <0.001] with heterogeneity index of (I 2 = 0.0%).This finding also revealed that decision maker to use family planning was significantly associated with the use of FP [ 26 ]; Disabled women whose decision to use family planning was made by their husband were 92% less likely to utilize family planning methods than women who made decisions by themselves [OR: 0.08; 95% CI (0.03, 0.21) P<0.001] with heterogeneity index (I 2 = 0%) ( Table 4 ) .
Furthermore, the pooled effects of participants who trusted health workers as capable to keep their privacy were significantly associated with the utilization of family planning [ 27 ]. Accordingly, participants who trusted health workers as capable to keep their privacy was 5.14 (3.13–8.43) times more likely to utilize family planning methods [OR = 3.73; 95% CI (3.13, 8.43) P<0.001] with heterogeneity index of 100% ( Table 4 ).
The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the pooled prevalence and associated factors of FP utilization among Ethiopian women with disabilities. To the best of our knowledge, this meta-analysis is the first of its kind in determining the national prevalence and significant factors of FP utilization among WWDs in Ethiopia, which will be used as input for policymakers, health care providers, and other stakeholders in developing evidence-based strategies to improve FP utilization among WWDs.
The overall pooled prevalence of family planning utilization among women with disabilities in Ethiopia was 29.57% (95% CI: 22.30, 36.83), which is lower than the Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey (EDHS) report 2019 [ 40 ]. This could be because the EDHS reports family planning utilization among all women, but this review was limited to WWDs. Also, it is lower than a review conducted in Ethiopia [ 41 , 42 ]. The difference might be due to the difference in the study period of primary studies and the study population, since the two studies are conducted among adolescents and postpartum women who are more information about sexual and reproductive health from different sources.
However the result of this review was higher than the minimum rate of family planning utilization among WWDs, according to a review conducted by Horner-Johnson [ 43 ] and Beyene GA [ 18 ]. The result of this study could be a pooled estimate of different studies, whereas Horner-Johnson and Beyene GA report the minimum and maximum range of family planning utilisation among WWDs by reviewing literature from different settings, and the comparison in this study was based on the minimum rage from the report. In addition, it was higher than a review conducted by Y.F. Geda and T.M. Berhe [ 44 ]. The difference could be due to differences in study participants and contraceptive type, as this study was conducted among WWDs for the use of all types of contraceptives, whereas a study by Y.F. Geda and T.M. Berhe was conducted among postpartum women for the use of immediate postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUCD).
Based on the subgroup analysis result, the prevalence of family planning utilization was found to be high in Addis Ababa region studies [32.61, (26.39, 38.82)]. This could be attributed to the city’s urbanization and women’s increased awareness. Because Addis Ababa is the country’s capital, disabled women may have more access to information on family planning. In Addis Ababa, there is also the Ethiopian Women with Disability Association, where many women participate and discuss their health, including family planning.
In addition, this review revealed that there is a high prevalence of family planning utilization among studies conducted after 2015 [32.61, (26.39, 38.82)]. The reason could be that after the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) were completed in 2015; The Ethiopian government developed a new plan called the Costed Implementation Plan for Family Planning, which includes various strategies to increase the contraceptive prevalence rate and decrease total fertility rate by 2020, that may encourage more women to use contraception [ 45 ]. Furthermore, various information distribution technologies such as social media are increasingly being used to disseminate information regarding family planning options. This may make it easier for women to learn about the advantages of family planning, where to get it, and how to use it.
In this review, the odds of utilizing FP were 8.6 times higher among women who had been in a marital union than their counterparts. This is in line with a review conducted in sub-Saharan Africa [ 46 ], Ethiopia [ 47 ] and a report from USAID [ 48 ]. This is because family planning can increase partners’ involvement in decisions about whether and when to have children while also assisting them in avoiding unintended pregnancy. It also provides her with enough time and opportunity to love and care for her husband and children. As a result, partner involvement in family planning decisions is critical, and a married woman may be encouraged to use contraception by her partner.
The findings of this study also revealed that women who discussed with their partner were 6 times more likely to use FP than those who did not. This is consistent with the review conducted in Sub-Saharan Africa [ 46 , 49 ]. This may be due to the fact that couples who talk about FP issues are more likely to jointly decide on the type of contraceptive method to use, the number of children to have, and the spacing between the children. As a result, they are more likely to use the service. Also Male participation in contraceptive use increases women’s uptake, according to a report from a review protocol by Anbesu and his colleagues [ 50 ]. In addition male involvement plays a role in the use of reproductive and maternal health services, and any factor that influences the partner’s attitude towards these services will have an effect on women’s use, either positively or negatively. So talking with a partner may give them the impression that she values their influence in her life, giving the woman more freedom to make decisions.
This study found that disabled women who had good knowledge were significantly associated with utilization of family planning. This finding was supported by a review finding from Ethiopia [ 42 , 44 ] and around the globe [ 49 ]. This might be attributed to an in-depth knowledge of family planning methods, which can improve women’s understanding and awareness of the importance and side effects of various contraceptive methods, allowing them to make an informed decision on the method to be used and, as a result, increase their usage of this service.
In this meta-analysis, economic status of the women was positively associated with FP utilization. Women who had rich economic status were more likely to utilize FP compared to their counterparts. This is consistent with a studies conducted by Mekonnen AG et.al [ 42 ]. This could be because women with higher economic status are more likely to be exposed to information on family planning due to their health seeking behavior for various reasons and their use of various information-gathering mass media such as the internet. The information may have influenced their use by helping them comprehend the purpose and importance of family planning methods.
In addition these reviews showed that a woman’s whose decision to use family planning was made by their husband were less likely to utilize family planning methods than women who made decisions by themselves. This finding was consistent with a study finding from different settings [ 51 , 52 ]. This might be due to the fact that decision-making autonomy on contraceptive use influences their utilization. Women’s independent decisions on reproductive health issues like FP are crucial and increase women’s access to health information and utilization. So less autonomy in the decision regarding contraceptive use due to male dominance at the household level may affect their utilization.
Accordingly, this review revealed that participants who trusted health workers as capable to keep their privacy was more likely to utilize family planning which is supported by a review conducted by Brittain et al. [ 53 ]. A possible explanation is that maintaining confidentiality and ensuring privacy are crucial for effective, sensitive management of potentially stigmatizing health conditions and improved quality care, including getting sexual and reproductive health services [ 54 , 55 ] So, if the woman believes the health care practitioner will respect her privacy and confidentiality, she is more likely to use the service.
There are limitations to this study. The absence of studies from some Ethiopian regions in this study makes it challenging to extrapolate the results to the national level. Second, the results should be interpreted cautiously due to the significant heterogeneity among the studies. Moreover, only observational study articles published in English were considered. Finally, we found it challenging to compare our results because there were few systematic reviews and meta-analyses conducted at the national, regional, and international levels.
According to the findings of this study, only one-third of disabled women in Ethiopia utilize family planning. Being married and discussing with a partner were significantly associated with family planning utilization among WWDs. Therefore, the discussions with the partner and their engagement in decisions to use family planning are critical to increase its use. It also important to increase access to quality contraceptive care and improve negative clinician attitudes and awareness of disabled women to increase utilization. In addition, it is critical to pay more attention to the reproductive health care needs of women with disabilities to improve health care equity.
S1 checklist, abbreviations.
CI | Confidence Interval |
EDHS | Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey |
FP | Family Planning |
MDG | Millennium Development Goals |
SNNPR | Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples Region |
WHO | World Health Organization |
WWDs | Women with Disabilities |
USAID | U.S. Agency for International Developmen |
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
16 May 2023
PONE-D-22-35356Utilization of Family Planning and Associated Factors among Women with Disabilities in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysisPLOS ONE
Dear Dr. Lemma,
Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.
==============================
ACADEMIC EDITOR:
- You said the PROSPERO registration is ongoing, what is the importance of registering it after you have published the review?
- It is better of specify the number of articles you have gotten from each data bases (Pub Med/MEDLINE=? Google Scholar=? African Journal of Online (AJOL)=? CINAHL=?, HINARI=?, Scopus=?, Science
Direct, Excerpta Medica database (EMBA, SE), DOAJ, Web of Science, Google, and other organization's websites=?)
- What is the final mesh term used in each searching engines?
- Is publication year or study period better indicating the time period of the articles?
- What does it mean p = 0.000?
- you have checked three independent variables to assess their association with the outcome variable, some single articles revealed more than three significant variables?
- the discussion is shallow, it needs to entertain more perspectives
Please submit your revised manuscript by Jun 30 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at gro.solp@enosolp . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.
Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:
If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.
If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .
We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.
Kind regards,
Journal requirements:
When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.
1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf
2. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.
3. Your ethics statement should only appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please move it to the Methods section and delete it from any other section. Please ensure that your ethics statement is included in your manuscript, as the ethics statement entered into the online submission form will not be published alongside your manuscript.
4. Please include a separate caption for each figure in your manuscript.
Reviewers' comments:
Reviewer's Responses to Questions
Comments to the Author
1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?
The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.
Reviewer #1: Yes
Reviewer #2: Partly
2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?
Reviewer #1: N/A
Reviewer #2: Yes
3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?
The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.
4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?
PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.
Reviewer #2: No
5. Review Comments to the Author
Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)
Reviewer #1: the matanalysis is very impotant as diasbilitis is a topic very poorly reported in current literture. this study underlines in ethiopoiaa those aspects in women with disabilities encoiunterin pregancy
Reviewer #2: Review Report
Title: Utilization of Family Planning and Associated Factors among Women with Disabilities in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Manuscript Number: PONE-D-22-35356.
a. Acknowledge for addressing disadvantaged segment of the community.
b. Scope: The scope of the issue and the outcome variables needs re-operationalization. The authors failed to include fertility.
c. Methods: Whether retracted articles are used in the analysis were not mentioned,
d. Illegibility: Not included all observational studies.
e. Whether all studies defined disability in the similar way: Not explained.
f. Data analysis and Presentation: Inadequate.
g. Authorship: inconsistent in the main document and in the methods section.
h. Language and statistic: Need major revision.
6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article ( what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.
If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.
Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .
Reviewer #1: Yes: Erich Cosmi
[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]
While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at gro.solp@serugif . Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.
23 Jun 2023
The authors would like to thank the editorial team and team of reviewers for constructive and valuable comments. The authors are very happy to submit the revised version of the manuscript entitled “Utilization of Family Planning and Associated Factors among Women with Disabilities in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis” for its publication in your Journal. The comments of the editors and the reviewers were highly insightful and enabled us to greatly improve the quality of our manuscript. In this revised manuscript we made substantial changes to address your concerns in a point-by-point response. We are very keen to incorporate further comments, if any, for the betterment of the final manuscript.
Response to the Editor
1. You said the PROSPERO registration is on-going, what is the importance of registering it after you have published the review?
Answer –Thank you for your comment; sorry for the inconvenience, and it is corrected in the revised manuscript.
2. It is better of specify the number of articles you have gotten from each data bases (Pub Med/MEDLINE=? Google Scholar=? African Journal of Online (AJOL)=? CINAHL=?, HINARI=?, Scopus=?,Science Direct, Excerpta Medica database (EMBA, SE), DOAJ, Web of Science, Google, and other organization's websites=?)
Answer – Thank you for your question. Here are the number of articles from each data base Pub Med/MEDLINE=681 Google Scholar=426 African Journal of Online (AJOL) =36 CINAHL=211, HINARI=191, Scopus=86, Science Direct=62, Excerpta Medica database (EMBA, SE) = 113, DOAJ= 38, Web of Science=26, Google= 271 and organization's websites=2)
3. What is the final mesh term used in each searching engines?
Answer –Thank you for your questions; you can see additional file 1 to understand the whole search engine by one of the most usable data base PubMed.
Here are some of the mesh terms that are used in searching engines.
Word Mesh terms
Utilization of Family Planning Family planning utilization, use of family planning methods, utilization of family planning services, State of family planning, Family Planning Service Utilization, practice of family planning, Providing family planning services, Contraceptive utilization
Factors associated with family planning Influencing Factors, associated factors, factors, factors influencing,
Women with disabilities Disabled women, disables , Women with disability, disability, disabilities,
4. Is publication year or study period better indicating the time period of the articles?
Answer –Thank you for your questions; the study period is better indicating the time period of the articles and publication year also used to determine how old the information can be.
1. What does it mean p = 0.000?
Answer –Thank you for your comment; it is an editorial problem and corrected in the revised manuscript
2. You have checked three independent variables to assess their association with the outcome variable, some single articles revealed more than three significant variable.
Answer – Thank you for your inquiry; you are right that some single articles revealed more than three significant variable. But the only factor identified as a significant factor in the two and above primary studies was included in this review and meta-analysis. That is the reason for only three independent variables were assessed for their association.
3. The discussion is shallow, it needs to entertain more perspectives
Answer –Thank you for your comment; it is accepted and corrected in the revised manuscript.
Response to the reviewer
Reviewer #1: the Meta analysis is very important as a disability is a topic very poorly reported in current literature. This study underlines in Ethiopia those aspects in women with disabilities encountering pregnancy.
Answer –Thank you for your insightful idea.
Reviewer #2:
A. Acknowledge for addressing disadvantaged segment of the community.
Answer –Thank you for your idea.
B. Scope: The scope of the issue and the outcome variables needs re-operationalization. The authors failed to include fertility.
Answer – Thank you for your comment; it is accepted and corrected on page 5 line 22-28 of the revised manuscript.
C. Methods: Whether retracted articles are used in the analysis were not mentioned,
Answer – Thank you for your comment; as mentioned in the Prisma diagram(figure 1), 13 articles were retracted to assess their eligibility, but only seven studies were included in the analysis and the other six articles were excluded because of the outcome of interest is not reported. It is also described on page 6, line 19-24 of the revised manuscript.
D. Illegibility: Not included all observational studies.
Answer – Thank you for your inquiry; First the authors plan to include all observational studies but all studies who fulfil the eligibility criteria in this review were crossectional, that’s why the authors don’t included all observational studies.
E. Whether all studies defined disability in the similar way: Not explained
Answer – Thank you for your suggestion, majority of the studies included in this review defined people with disability as women having hearing, visual and physical impairments or limb defects (1–5). This is described in the revised manuscript on page 5, line 23-24.
F. Data analysis and Presentation: Inadequate.
Answer – Thank you for your comment. The authors carried out all of the necessary analysis to show the findings of the meta-analysis, such as a random effects model that was used to determine the pooled prevalence of family planning utilisation, as shown in Figure 2. Because there is heterogeneity across studies, meta-regression and subgroup analysis were used to identify the source of heterogeneity using the sample size, year of study, and region, as shown in Figures 4A and 4B. A funnel plot and Egger's test were used to check for publication bias, as shown in Figure 3 and Table 2. A leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was also performed to see how individual studies affected the pooled estimate of family planning utilisation. The results showed that removing a single study had no significant effect on pooled prevalence, as shown in Table 3.
G. Authorship: inconsistent in the main document and in the methods section.
Answer – Thank you for your comment; it is accepted and corrected in the revised manuscript.
H. Language and statistic: Need major revision.
Answer – Thank you for your feedback; it has been accepted, and the paper has been revised by language experts and online writing tools like Grammarly and QuillBot. As previously stated, this study performed all of the necessary analysis in order to show the results of the meta-analysis.
1. Beyene GA, Munea AM, Fekadu GA. Modern contraceptive use and associated factors among women with disabilities in gondar city, amhara region, north west ethiopia: A cross sectional study. Afr J Reprod Health. 2019;23(2):101–9.
2. Kellali T, Hadush G FH. Modern Contraceptive Methods Utilization and Associated Factors among Women with Disabilities. Int J Pharm Biol Sci Fundam [Internet]. 2017;13(01)(01):1–8. Available from: www.ijpbsf.com
3. Mekonnen AG, Bayleyegn AD, Aynalem YA, Adane TD, Muluneh MA, Asefa M. Level of knowledge, attitude, and practice of family planning and associated factors among disabled persons, north-shewa zone, Amhara regional state, Ethiopia. Contracept Reprod Med. 2020;5(1):1–7.
4. Mesfin Yesgat Y, Gebremeskel F, Estifanous W, Gizachew Y, Jemal S, Atnafu N, et al.
Utilization of Family Planning Methods and Associated Factors Among Reproductive-Age Women with Disability in Arba Minch Town, Southern Ethiopia
. Open Access J Contracept. 2020;Volume 11:25–32.
5. Abera S. The Assessment of Determinants of family planning use and unmet need among women of reproductive age group with disabilities in Addis Ababa. 2016;(November).
Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx
28 Jun 2023
PONE-D-22-35356R1Utilization of Family Planning and Associated Factors among Women with Disabilities in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysisPLOS ONE
Dear Dr. Lemma,
Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 12 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at gro.solp@enosolp . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.
Lebeza Alemu Tenaw
Academic Editor
Additional Editor Comments :
I have attached the additional comments that should be considered in the next revision.
Submitted filename: Manuscript-C.docx
17 Jul 2023
The authors would like to thank the editorial team for constructive and valuable comments. The authors are very happy to submit the revised version of the manuscript entitled “Utilization of Family Planning and Associated Factors among Women with Disabilities in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis” for its publication in your Journal. The comments were highly insightful and enabled us to greatly improve the quality of our manuscript. In this revised manuscript we made substantial changes to address your concerns in a point-by-point response. We are very keen to incorporate further comments, if any, for the betterment of the final manuscript.
1. Comment [A1]: As I have said in the previous comment the identified articles from each data base is needed…..PubMed=-----?, CINARI=----? For each databases
2. Comment [A2]: I haven’t seen the logical evidences to exclude case control study in this review.
Answer – Thank you for your inquiry; First the authors plan to include all observational studies but all studies who fulfil the eligibility criteria in this review were crossectional, that’s why the authors don’t included other observational studies like case control studies
3. Comment [A3]: What is your standard to say this finding is low?
Answer – According to the Ethiopian Demographic Health Survey 2019, this finding is low.
4. Comment [A4]: Have you got in your finding which showed health care equity and quality were the main determinant factors for low FP service utilization?
5. Comment [A5 & A6]: This study aimed to determine the pooled prevalence and associated factors for FP service utilization among WWDs in Ethiopia; better to state it at the end of the last paragraph of the introduction.
6. Comment [A7]: Thank you for your comment; it is accepted and corrected in the revised manuscript.
7. Comment [A8]: Which articles were included or excluded based on this reason.
Answer – Thank you for your inquiry; the included and excluded studies are cited in the revised manuscript.
8. Comment [A9]: Thank you for your comment; it is accepted and corrected in the revised manuscript.
9. Comment [A10]: Is there any logical evidence to exclude a single variable which showed significant association in the single study?
Answer– Even though there is no clear evidence to exclude a single variable that showed a significant association in the single study, meta-regression is the aggregate result of two or more studies. So to get the pooled results of different studies, the authors preferred to extract factors that were reported in two or more studies.
10. Comment [A11]: Better to state all variables even they don’t have significant association
Answer– Thank you for your comment; as we mentioned earlier in this study the variable was extracted as factors, if it is significant associations in two or more primary papers. So, in this study only three variables were extracted as a factor and among them two of them are significantly associated with the dependent variable which is seen in Table 4.
11. Comment [A13]: You have used very limited literatures for discussion.
12. Comment [A14]: Thank you for your comment; it is accepted and corrected in the revised manuscript.
Submitted filename: Second Revision Response to the Editor.docx
20 Jul 2023
PONE-D-22-35356R2Utilization of Family Planning and Associated Factors among Women with Disabilities in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysisPLOS ONE
Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 03 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at gro.solp@enosolp . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.
- The reason to exclude case control studies not convincing.
- Excluding variables which are significant in the single study is not advisable; we can take odds ration even though it may be not significant.
15 Aug 2023
1. The reason to exclude case control studies not convincing.
Answer: Thank you for your comment, as the authors mentioned in the manuscript on page 5 lines 2-4, both published and unpublished observational studies in English that report the prevalence and/or associated factors of family planning utilization among disabled women in Ethiopia were considered. But all studies which fulfill the inclusion criteria are crossectional, that’s why all the included studies were crossectional.
2. Excluding variables which are significant in the single study is not advisable; we can take odds ration even though it may be not significant.
Answer: Thank you for your comment, its accepted and corrected as your kind recommendation in the revised manuscript on pages 9 and 10.
Submitted filename: Response to the Editor 3.docx
24 Aug 2023
Utilization of Family Planning and Associated Factors among Women with Disabilities in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
PONE-D-22-35356R3
Dear Dr.Tesfanesh,
We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.
Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.
An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ , click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at gro.solp@gnillibrohtua .
If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact gro.solp@sserpeno .
Dear Dr. Demisse:
I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.
If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact gro.solp@sserpeno .
If we can help with anything else, please email us at gro.solp@enosolp .
Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.
PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff
on behalf of
Mr. Lebeza Alemu Tenaw
IMAGES
COMMENTS
To assess the knowledge and attitude regarding family planning and the practice of family planning among the women of reproductive age group in South Achefer District, Northwest Ethiopia, 2017.The study showed that the overall proper knowledge, attitude ...
Background. The use of modern family planning methods among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) is of public health importance in Ethiopia. Nationally, modern family planning method use remains a...
There are studies on women's decision-making in family planning use; however, there are inconsistent findings. Therefore, this review protocol aims to determine the pooled prevalence of women's decision-making regarding family planning use and its determinants in Ethiopia.
This review is aimed to investigate family planning knowledge, attitudes, and practices in east African countries. through published papers.A re view was conducted on knowledge, attitude and ...
Background Understanding why people do not use family planning is critical to address unmet needs and to increase contraceptive use. According to the Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey 2011, most women and men had knowledge on some family planning methods but only about 29% of married women were using contraceptives. 20% women had an unmet need for family planning. We examined knowledge ...
Family planning (FP) is a human right, and ensuring women's access to FP is central to protecting the health and wellbeing of mothers and children. Over the past two decades, Ethiopia has made FP service more widely available, increasing the contraceptive prevalence rate from 8% in 2000 to 41% in 2019. This remarkable fivefold increase can be attributed to the country's overall development ...
Therefore, there is a need to assess the level of knowledge and attitudes towards family planning, and associated factors among reproductive-age women in the four emerging regions of Ethiopia.
Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the pooled knowledge level of PCC and its association with family planning usage among women in Ethiopia.
Therefore, this review protocol aims to determine the pooled prevalence of women's decision-making regarding family planning use and its determinants in Ethiopia.
Forest plot showing the association between knowledge women on family planning methods and women's decisions regarding family planning use in Ethiopia.
This study aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence and factors associated with postpartum modern contraceptive use in Ethiopia.Systematic Reviews and …
Abstract In 2019, Ethiopia had a total fertility rate of 4.2 births per woman with the rates varying significantly across regions. The Federal Ministry of Health of Ethiopia announced "Ethiopia FP 2020" to address the high fertility rate, aiming to reduce it to 3.0 by 2020. This study aimed to identify the determinants of the use of modern family planning services in the Amhara, Oromia ...
Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis was intended to estimate the pooled prevalence of client satisfaction with Ethiopian family planning services in Ethiopia. The findings of the review can be used to develop strategies and draft policies in the country.
Background Even though the modern contraceptive use was improved in Ethiopia, the utilization of long-acting family planning services is still low because of numerous factors. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize logical evidence about factors associated with long acting family planning service utilization in Ethiopia.
Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess quality of family planning services and associated factors among reproductive age women attending family planning unit in public health facilities in Dire Dawa, Eastern Ethiopia.
Objective To assess the knowledge and attitude regarding family planning and the practice of family planning among the women of reproductive age group in South Achefer District, Northwest Ethiopia, 2017. Result The study showed that the overall proper knowledge, attitude and practice of women towards family planning (FP) was 42.3%, 58.8%, and 50.4% respectively. Factors associated with the ...
Utilization of Family Planning Methods and Associated Factors Among Reproductive-Age Women with Disability in Arba Minch Town, Southern Ethiopia
A wide knowledge and research gap on postpartum family planning service was identified through this scoping review of the scientific literature. Ethiopia is one of the geographical countries that has achieved a speedy increase in its trendy contraceptive prevalence rate increasing from 10% in 2005 to 60% in 2019 ( 20 ).
Family planning is the most effective method to control the continuing growth of the population. Ethiopia is currently one of the fastest growing countries in the world, with a growth rate of 3.02% per year. In the next forty to fifty years, Ethiopia is predicted to account for a significant portion of the population growth expected throughout Africa. According to Ethiopia Mini Demographic and ...
o improving maternal health and bringing about development. Since the revision of the first guideline in 2011, there have been various local and international updates on the provision of family planning services. The revision of the second national family planning guideline follows the development of the health sector plan, the release of revised WHO medical eligibility criteria, and the need ...
Male involvement in the use of family planning and associated factors in Gondar City, Northwest Ethiopia: A community-based cross-sectional study Department of Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety, Institute of Public Health, University of Gondar, Gondar City, Ethiopia
Conclusion The finding of this study showed that utilization of family planning among women with disability is relatively lower than the Ethiopian Demographic Health Survey 2019. Therefore, the discussions with the partner and their engagement in decisions to use family planning are critical to increase its use. Go to:
Explore the latest full-text research PDFs, articles, conference papers, preprints and more on FAMILY PLANNING. Find methods information, sources, references or conduct a literature review on ...