write 20 method of teaching traditional education

Open Access is an initiative that aims to make scientific research freely available to all. To date our community has made over 100 million downloads. It’s based on principles of collaboration, unobstructed discovery, and, most importantly, scientific progression. As PhD students, we found it difficult to access the research we needed, so we decided to create a new Open Access publisher that levels the playing field for scientists across the world. How? By making research easy to access, and puts the academic needs of the researchers before the business interests of publishers.

We are a community of more than 103,000 authors and editors from 3,291 institutions spanning 160 countries, including Nobel Prize winners and some of the world’s most-cited researchers. Publishing on IntechOpen allows authors to earn citations and find new collaborators, meaning more people see your work not only from your own field of study, but from other related fields too.

Brief introduction to this section that descibes Open Access especially from an IntechOpen perspective

Want to get in touch? Contact our London head office or media team here

Our team is growing all the time, so we’re always on the lookout for smart people who want to help us reshape the world of scientific publishing.

Home > Books > Lifelong Learning - Education for the Future World

Special Offer!

Applies to all print copy prices | Offer ends 15 December 2024 Enter the code 20PRINT to unlock the offer

Order this book in hard copy and enjoy a 20% discount! Use the promo code  20PRINT  during the ordering process.

And that's not all! You'll also receive a complimentary bag with an inspiring quote.

Code copied to clipboard!

Valid Until: 15 December 2024

Note: All orders include FREE SHIPPING

(DAP Incoterms – Import duties and taxes are not included).

If you require assistance, contact us at  [email protected].

Bridging the Gap: Traditional vs. Modern Education (A Value-Based Approach for Multiculturalism)

Submitted: 13 November 2023 Reviewed: 06 December 2023 Published: 18 January 2024

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.114068

Cite this chapter

There are two ways to cite this chapter:

From the Edited Volume

Lifelong Learning - Education for the Future World

Edited by Filippo Gomez Paloma

To purchase hard copies of this book, please contact the representative in India: CBS Publishers & Distributors Pvt. Ltd. www.cbspd.com | [email protected]

Chapter metrics overview

282 Chapter Downloads

Impact of this chapter

Total Chapter Downloads on intechopen.com

Total Chapter Views on intechopen.com

The dynamic landscape of education has witnessed a profound shift from traditional to modern pedagogical paradigms over the years. The discussion of results delves into the intriguing debate between traditional and modern educational systems (TES and MES), examining them through the lens of a value-based approach. This exploration is crucial in understanding how these two approaches shape the educational experiences of learners, faculty, and impact society at large. Drawing from the literature review and insights from a survey involving 179 students and 28 faculty staff, the work advocates a balanced integration of traditional and modern educational approaches. It underscores the pressing need for a value-based model that harmonizes age-old wisdom with contemporary innovations. The survey reveals student aspirations for a holistic, value-driven education, while the faculty acknowledges challenges and opportunities inherent in bridging this educational gap. In conclusion, the data reinforce the value-based approach, emphasizing its importance in curricula and pedagogy to promote ethical values, critical thinking, and empathy. Furthermore, the findings shed light on practical implementation challenges and offer valuable guidance to educators and policymakers. In an era of transformative education, bridging theory and practice will resonate with both students and faculty who recognize the societal benefits of a balanced synthesis between tradition and modernity.

• traditional education
• modern education
• value-based approach
• multiculturalism
• pedagogical paradigm
• ethical values
• critical thinking

Author Information

Oksana chaika *.

• National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

*Address all correspondence to: [email protected], [email protected]

1. Introduction

The contemporary state of education is subject to be in constant flux, paving new ways and vision for the pedagogical paradigms with technological advancements, evolving societal needs, and being parallelly shaped by historical traditions driven by established educational practices. In recent decades, the dichotomy between traditional and modern educational systems (TES and MES) has emerged as a central point of debate [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]. Traditional education, deeply rooted in heritage, often emphasizes rote learning and discipline [ 4 , 5 ], especially for science majors such as math, physics, etc. that lay primary focus on calculation and comprehension, that is, according to Wang “some subjects that focus more on thinking application and deep calculation should be taught in traditional ways” ([ 4 ], p. 272) and “although traditional lecture-style teaching is more boring than high-tech classrooms, it can be more effective at improving test scores” ([ 4 ], p. 271); it is also stated that “rote learning is a well-practiced approach at all educational level, where education and assessments emphasize on memorization of content rather than comprehension and application of content in real life events” ([ 5 ], p. 114). On the other hand, modern education emphasizes innovation, learner-centric methodologies, and the integration of technology, among which cultural literacy, originality, and creativity play a crucial role, for example, “the content [of cultural literacy] in the pedagogical culture is seen pertinent to the modern FL teacher” and at the same time, it includes “professionalism, non-standard way of thinking/thinking out of the box, originality, high level literacy, expressiveness, logic, lexical wealth and communication, creativity, and culture awareness and readiness for diversity in perception” ([ 2 ], p. 103). This evolving educational landscape necessitates a critical examination to address the challenges and opportunities it presents.

Thus, the research problem at hand is the need to navigate this evolving terrain of education effectively. Understanding the dynamics, strengths, and limitations of TES and MES is crucial. Moreover, it is essential to explore how a value-based approach can bridge the gap and create a more holistic educational experience [ 6 , 7 , 8 ] for students and teachers. In this regard, Dogan believes, “the empowerment of the employees who believe in the organization’s values and respect to employees enable the employees to work at full capacity and to become happy” ([ 6 ], p. 84]); moreover, “making radical changes in the behaviors of individuals based on the values is composed of three stages, including seeing, feeling and change” and for instance, “the stage of ‘seeing’ increases the employees’ awareness towards the values” [ 6 ]. The significance of this research lies in its potential to inform educators, policymakers, and stakeholders on the path towards a more balanced and meaningful educational model.

What are the key characteristics and pedagogical paradigms of TES as defined by faculty and students?

How does MES differ from TES, and what innovations does it bring to the educational landscape?

What is the concept of a value-based approach in education, and how can it be implemented effectively, for example, for foreign language teaching and acquisition (FLT and FLA)?

What is the potential impact of a value-based educational model on learners and society?

To address these research questions, a comprehensive approach, combining literature reviews and the survey, was employed. This mixed-method approach [ 7 ] allowed for a deep exploration of the topic, incorporating both theoretical data and comments by the students and faculty from perspectives of their empirical value as real-world experiences from the educational community.

The research findings break into several sections. The introduction is followed by the review of the literature related to TES and MES, value-based education, in the light of the research agenda. Following that, the methodology section explains the survey design, data collection, and analysis. Then, the focus is laid on a discussion of the value-based approach, including its principles, theoretical framework, and practical implications. Finally, the research explores the challenges and opportunities in implementing a value-based approach in education, offering the educational model to be considered by educators, policymakers, and stakeholders. It concludes by summarizing key findings, emphasizing the importance of a balanced approach to education, and suggesting potential future research directions.

2. Theoretical readings

Education, deeply intertwined with culture and tradition, has a rich historical legacy. TES, often characterized by rote learning, discipline, and the transmission of societal values, can be traced back to ancient civilizations [ 8 , 9 ]. For example, the Confucian educational system in ancient China placed a strong emphasis on the teachings of classic texts, which became a cornerstone of traditional education [ 10 ]. The emergence of MES marked a shift towards learner-centric approaches, innovation, and the integration of technology [ 1 , 11 , 12 ]. In the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, educational reform movements in Europe, such as those initiated by Rousseau and Pestalozzi, laid the groundwork for contemporary educational principles with Rousseau’s three components in education: “This education comes to us from nature itself, or from other men, or from circumstances” as cited in Bazaluk ([ 13 ], p. 17) and Pestalozzi’s “new understanding of the meaning of human life and a cultural ideal”, as well as the philosopher’s basic principle of education: “education should be built according to the natural course of mental development in a child” [ 13 ]. The implementation of compulsory education and the advent of public schooling in the United States and Europe, including Ukraine, further exemplified this shift [ 14 , 15 , 16 ]. Value-based education, rooted in the philosophical underpinnings of moral and ethical development, seeks to instill values such as empathy, critical thinking, and global awareness in learners, based on fostering poly- and multiculturalism in educational classrooms [ 12 , 16 , 17 ]. This approach draws from various theories, including Kohlberg’s theory of moral development, which emphasizes the importance of nurturing ethical reasoning in education [ 18 , 19 ]. Moreover, McKenzie and Blenkinsop’s “ethic of care” highlights the significance of empathy and relationships in the educational process [ 19 ].

3. Research methodology

The methodology for this study involved the creation of a structured survey instrument to gather data on the perceptions and experiences of individuals within the traditional and modern educational systems. The survey was meticulously designed to explore key aspects of both systems and their potential convergence in a value-based approach [ 17 ]. Development included the formulation of clear and concise questions that addressed the objectives of the research and followed either the Likert scale or open-ended questions that allowed for argumentation and substantiation of opinions. Statistically, the research sample consisted of 179 students and 28 faculty staff members from the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine. A purposive sampling technique was employed to ensure a representative mix of participants with varying educational backgrounds, experiences, and perspectives. Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Data collection primarily relied on an online survey platform, allowing for the efficient distribution of the questionnaire to the selected participants. The survey comprised both closed-ended and open-ended questions, providing a balance between quantifiable data and in-depth qualitative responses. Participants were given a reasonable time frame to complete the survey to ensure thoughtful and accurate responses. The data collected from the survey was subjected to both quantitative and qualitative analysis. Qualitative data from open-ended questions were subjected to thematic analysis to identify common themes and patterns. The integration of both quantitative and qualitative analyses allowed for a comprehensive understanding of the research questions.

The study adhered to ethical guidelines and protocols. Informed consent was secured from all participants, assuring them of anonymity and confidentiality. Data was stored securely, and all personal identifiers were removed during data analysis to ensure participants’ privacy and confidentiality. The research was conducted with the utmost integrity and respect for the rights and well-being of the participants.

4. Results and discussion

The research findings point to the dichotomy between TES and MES, reinforcing the approaches to education. Thus, the study by Alsubaie investigated the effects of traditional and modern teaching methods on student achievement and found that student-centered modern approaches tend to yield better results [ 20 ]. Contrarily, another study by Chavan and Chavan [ 21 ] emphasized the value of traditional education, on the one hand, in preserving cultural heritage and moral values and certain concerns, on the other, for example, “Within the traditional knowledge system, there was a natural obligation, empathy, and overall mentoring towards students by teachers and reverence and submissiveness was exhibited by students towards teachers. Today, teachers, students, and knowledge are all treated as ‘objects’ whose value depends on the quantitative returns ‘it’ can provide” ([ 21 ], p. 278).

TES focuses on teacher-centered instruction while MES embraces learner-centered and interactive approaches: P18, “I reckon most of the seminars being conducted traditionally are rather good, especially when all the students are asked the questions and no one is bored”, P54, “MES offers personalized learning, technology integration, and a focus on critical thinking and problem-solving”;

TES uses textbooks and printed materials as primary resources as contrasted to MES which utilizes a wide range of digital and multimedia resources: P53, “TES provides a time-tested approach to education. This can offer a sense of stability and familiarity for students. However, MES incorporates modern technology and teaching methods, promoting more interactive learning and adaptability to individual student needs”, P75, “The usage of most of the online pros, such as laptops, presentations, there are more opportunities for the future; Nevertheless, I can’t deny the effectiveness of TES”;

in TES, teachers are seen as the primary source of knowledge and authority, however, in MES, teachers would rather encourage student autonomy and self-directed learning: Participant 14 (P14), “The main advantages [of TES] are the opportunities for students to master the theoretical part of knowledge. This will allow them to use it in the future with possible practical skills”; P36, “TES has limitations, such as potential limitations in adapting to individual learning styles and the rapid pace of technological advancements. MES, on the other hand, offers benefits such as personalized learning, technology integration, and global connectivity”;

TES is mainly characterized by its hierarchical and discipline-oriented structure whereas MES is perceived as flexible and adaptable, and according to the students’ answers in their key focus—often tailored to individual needs of the learner: P27, “TES can provide stronger learning of core knowledge through in-depth interaction with teachers and a focus on core academic subjects. It also often includes a rigorous curriculum and structured learning process, which can promote a disciplined approach to learning”, P122, “TES often prioritizes the basics, such as reading and writing. In addition, the teacher plays a central role, providing direct instruction and guidance, which can be beneficial for students who learn well in a structured learning environment. Also, traditional systems emphasize discipline, punctuality, obedience, and compliance.”, P81, “MES often provide more accessibility through technology, learning experiences, and up-to-date content. They can better cater to individual student needs and adapt to a rapidly changing world, making education more engaging”, and

TES promotes uniformity and conformity in learning while MES encourages creativity and independent thinking of the learner: P162, “TES - Stability and reliability, cultural heritage, specialization, number 1 system”, P171, “Modern education often allows for more flexible scheduling, catering to non-traditional students, working adults, or those with diverse time commitments”, P72, “MES focuses on fostering twenty-first century skills such as critical thinking, creativity, communication, collaboration, and digital literacy”, etc.

Demographic information: participants’ age range.

These and other comments were made by the participants with the following educational background: 29.3% were participants with a college degree (high school) and incomplete bachelor’s that referred mainly to students in their first through fourth years at university; 51.2% were master students; 9.8% were faculty staff with a Ph.D. and/or more advanced degree in science, and ultimately 2.4%—“other”, that stands for a visiting researcher.

Moreover, 78% of participants experienced education in both the systems—TES and MES whereas 22% underlined their good acquaintance and journeys with either TES or MES ( Figure 2 ).

Education experience.

Finally, when the questions regarded the emotional part of the participants’ experience with TES and MES and the information about their education systems awareness and educational preferences, that is, which educational systems they feel most familiar with or have spent the most time in, under the half (41.5%) replied they felt comfortable and familiar with both the systems and the other two groups had a difference of 14.6% as to their understanding and preferences for TES (36.6%) over MES (22%) ( Figure 3 ).

Familiarity with TES and MES.

P44, “TES typically follows a well-defined curriculum, providing a structured and organized approach to learning.”

P56, “Traditional education often leads to recognized degrees, diplomas, or certificates, which are widely accepted by employers and institutions. This provides students with formal qualifications that can enhance their career prospects.”

P32, “In traditional educational settings, students have access to experienced educators who can provide guidance, support, and mentorship.”

P101, “Traditional educational institutions typically provide access to libraries, laboratories, and other resources, which can be essential for hands-on learning and research.”

P49, “MES is better in the practical part of learning of any subject. You receive more applied information and learn new practical skills, which are more similar to real-life situations.” and P94, “An individualized approach to each student and a variety of techniques are the strengths of the modern educational model. This allows the student to feel comfortable and apply knowledge in practice.”

P8, “Modern education leverages technology to enhance learning. This includes e-learning platforms, multimedia resources, and online collaboration tools, which can make education more engaging and accessible.”

P78, “Modern education often allows for more flexible scheduling, catering to non-traditional students, working adults, or those with diverse time commitments.”

P163, “Educational technology allows for the collection and analysis of data to gain insights into student progress and areas of improvement, enabling more targeted interventions.”

These and many other comments, feedback, and remarks allowed for grouping the received data under the keywords and phrases that resulted in Table 1 .

Traditional educational system vs. modern educational system.

Another remarkable aspect of the survey makes it conclude that it is not always that the younger generation, as compared to the teaching/lecturing faculty of more age seniority and less digital proficiency, would favor MES, for instance, let us follow P86, “For me, a person who doesn’t like to explore new things, the traditional system is the best, as it has everything I’m used to.”

Next, like the above, where behavioral patterns and/or values play their crucial role, the below comments shed light on what may be significantly valuable while designing and implementing curricula. The values of critical thinking, future vision, and empathy matter to a greater degree, that is, P49 names critical thinking as a value because “MES places a strong emphasis on developing critical thinking skills, students are encouraged to analyze, evaluate, and synthesize information independently” and adds that “This skill is invaluable in various aspects of life, including problem-solving and decision-making”; P90 focuses on the importance of preparation for the future as “MES equips students with skills relevant to the rapidly changing job market” and “Emphasis on subjects like computer science, coding, and digital literacy prepares students for careers in technology and other evolving fields.”

That underscores the importance of scanning the learning mood and educational preferences in classrooms and outside; in an ever-evolving world, the need for innovation is not limited to technology alone; it extends to the way we approach education and pedagogical systems.

5. Value-based approach in education

Taking the discussion further, the exploration leads to the integration of a value-based educational model and bridging the gap between TES and MES, offering real-world solutions that can enhance quality, progress, and enjoyment.

A value-based educational model is a holistic approach to learning, emphasizing the development of not only academic knowledge but also strong ethical principles and values. In this model, core values such as integrity, empathy, and responsibility are integrated into the educational process, ensuring that students not only excel academically but also grow as responsible, ethical individuals [ 22 ].

Drawing from educational theories such as social learning, constructivism, and moral development, the integration of values into education is a well-structured framework [ 23 , 24 ]. These theories provide a foundation for teaching critical thinking, ethical decision-making, and empathy, allowing students to become well-rounded individuals who can navigate an ever-changing world while adhering to timeless ethical principles [ 13 , 16 , 22 ].

Traditional education often relies on rote learning, while modern education places an emphasis on critical thinking and creativity. The value-based approach bridges this gap by combining the strengths of both, nurturing individuals who can adapt to a changing world while upholding ethical principles [ 1 , 3 , 17 ].

According to the survey, 85.3% of participants believe that values are very important/important in education as contrasted to only 4.9% who do not find them very important almost similar to 2.4% who state they are not important at all as only technical knowledge, expertise, and practical skills matter in the job market today ( Figure 4 ); and 7.3% neither agree nor disagree, where the comments specify that the value component is fully personal and plays little role in education; however, it will play its role in family and work life in future.

Values in education.

To bridge the gap between TES and MES via a value-based approach, participants suggest as follows: P3, “We should try to change the basic course of study and let students decide for themselves what to prioritize. Some people prefer practical knowledge, some prefer theory. We should respect people’s preferences in exploring the approaches that suit them.”; P70, “Implement a blended learning approach that combines elements of TES and MES, this can involve a mix of traditional classroom instruction and technology-enhanced learning experiences.”; P32, “Provide comprehensive and ongoing professional development for teachers to adopt innovative teaching methods and effectively integrate technology into their instructional practices”, which can ensure that teachers are equipped with the skills and knowledge to harness the benefits of both TES and MES in their classrooms; P162, “Design educational frameworks that allow for individualized learning paths” to involve incorporating personalized learning plans, adaptive learning technologies, and student self-assessment; P117, “Place a greater emphasis on developing essential skills such as critical thinking, creativity, communication, collaboration, and digital literacy because these skills are crucial for success in the modern world and can be integrated into both TES and MES approaches.”, etc.

Implementing a value-based educational model has practical implications that positively impact both students and the education system. Students exposed to this approach are more likely to become empathetic, socially responsible individuals who can address complex ethical challenges, leading to improved classroom behavior and a positive school culture [ 3 , 4 , 16 ].

6. Impact on learners and society

The study has brought to the forefront the contrasting characteristics of TES, rooted in tradition and discipline, and MES, driven by innovation and learner-centric methodologies. Participants have expressed a resounding consensus on the need for a more holistic educational model, one that combines the strengths of both systems while emphasizing values such as empathy, tolerance, and cultural diversity.

Speaking about the impact on learners and society, it is required to spotlight (a) the imperative of a balanced approach, (b) the need to transform the educational landscape, and (c) a call to action for educators and policymakers, in particular.

Thus, the implications of the research underscore the critical significance of a balanced educational approach. A value-based educational framework that seamlessly integrates the merits of TES and MES can give rise to a more comprehensive and harmonious learning environment. It fosters not only academic excellence but also the ethical and emotional intelligence essential for thriving in an increasingly interconnected world.

Next, the findings extend beyond the boundaries of this study. They have far-reaching implications for the educational landscape, offering the promise of transformation. The integration of a value-based approach carries the potential to shape a generation of learners who are not only academically proficient but also socially responsible, empathetic, and culturally aware. Finally, the present research calls for consideration, further reflection, and most importantly, action. It calls upon educators, policymakers, and stakeholders to reevaluate the core values that underpin education and the pedagogical methodologies employed. A value-based approach represents an opportunity to redefine the educational landscape, nurturing empathetic, critical, and globally aware individuals. With the onward look to the future, education is not confined to the acquisition of knowledge alone; it is about the transformation of individuals and the enrichment of society. It is believed that with an embraced balanced approach and prioritized value-based education, learners and society at large may reap the benefits of the best of both traditional and modern educational systems.

7. Conclusions and recommendations

In the realm of education, the coexistence of TES and MES presents a fascinating landscape for researchers. Along with the challenges, there are opportunities and lessons learned from the coexistence of these systems, that lead to shape future research directions.

To be realistic, it is necessary to address the obstacles in implementing a value-based approach, especially the two identified with the processed and analyzed research data—resistance to change and assessment methods.

Following the findings, one significant challenge in integrating a value-based approach into both TES and MES is the resistance to change. Educators, parents, and institutions may be reluctant to shift from traditional content-focused teaching to a more values-oriented curriculum. Another challenge arises with the assessment methods. Traditional systems often rely on standardized testing for assessment, making it challenging to evaluate students’ personal values and ethics. It also reads in Halstead and Taylor [ 25 ] that developing effective and standardized methods for assessing values is an ongoing challenge.

However, by laying more focus on incorporating technology in classroom and advancing community engagement, TES and MES can find more opportunities for promoting value-based education. The integration of technology, such as e-learning platforms and educational apps, offers a promising avenue to promote value-based education. Today, more and more researchers are exploring how technology can be used to deliver values-centered content [ 1 , 8 , 9 ]. Collaborating with community organizations and stakeholders provides an opportunity to reinforce values taught in school. There have been many works published where research focuses on strategies to engage local communities in shaping students’ values [ 17 , 23 ].

To design and implement strategies (a) for integrating values into educational curricula, (b) guidance for educators, policymakers, and stakeholders as educators should effectively integrate values into their teaching methods, policymakers should establish these clear guidelines for values-based curricula, and stakeholders should offer support through resources and advocacy.

To consider future research directions for long-term impact, cross-cultural studies, and teacher training.

Future research should focus on assessing the long-term impact of values-based education on students’ personal and professional lives, examining its influence on career success, societal well-being, and global citizenship. Comparative studies across different cultural and socio-economic backgrounds are needed to determine the adaptability and effectiveness of value-based education in diverse settings. In the end, more research should explore effective teacher training programs that prepare educators to deliver values-centered content and foster ethical development in students.

In conclusion, the coexistence of TES and MES presents both challenges and opportunities in the integration of value-based education. Lessons from the survey and literature review highlight the positive impact of values-based education on students, while recommendations emphasize the importance of standardized curricula and support from educators, policymakers, and stakeholders.

A. Survey questionnaire

Section 1: demographic information

1.1. What is your age ?

18–24

25–34

35–44

45–54

55–64

1.2. What is your gender?

Prefer not to say

1.3. What is your educational background?

High school

Bachelor’s degree

Master’s degree

Ph.D. or other advanced degree

Other (please specify)

Section 2: experience and preferences

2.1. Have you experienced education in both traditional and modern educational systems (TES and MES)?

2.2. Which educational system do you feel most familiar with or have spent the most time in?

Traditional educational system (TES)

Modern educational system (MES)

Both equally

2.3. What, in your opinion, are the key strengths of TES in comparison to MES? Why?

2.4. What, in your opinion, are the key strengths of MES in comparison to TES? Why?

Section 3: values in education

3.1. How important do you believe it is to integrate values such as empathy, tolerance, and cultural diversity into the education system?

Very important

Not very important

Not important at all

3.2. Do you think traditional educational systems place enough emphasis on teaching these values?

3.3. Do you think modern educational systems place enough emphasis on teaching these values?

3.4. What other values in your opinion are important for education today? Why?

Section 4: bridging the gap

4.1. In your opinion, what strategies or changes could be made to bridge the gap between TES and MES and create a more balanced educational model?

Section 5: overall impressions

5.1. Overall, do you believe it is possible to create a value-based educational system that successfully combines elements of both TES and MES?

Section 6: additional comments

6.1. Is there anything else you would like to share or any additional comments related to traditional and modern educational systems?

• 1. Dewsbury B, Brame CJ. Inclusive teaching. CBE – Life Sciences Education. 2019; 18 (2):1-5. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.19-01-0021
• 2. Chaika O. Implementing technology of poly-/multicultural education for future foreign language teachers: Integrated approach. International Journal of Philology. 2022; 13 (4):101-109. DOI: 10.31548/philolog13(4_2).2022.011
• 3. Alsubaie MA. The influence of traditional and modern teaching methods on students’ achievements. Journal of Education and Practice. 2015; 6 (19):29-40
• 4. Wang Y. A comparative study on the effectiveness of traditional and modern teaching methods. In: 2022 5th International Conference on Humanities Education and Social Sciences (ICHESS 2022). Zhengzhou: Atlantis Press; 2022. pp. 270-277
• 5. Ahmed A, Ahmed N. Comparative analysis of rote learning on high and low achievers in graduate and undergraduate programs. Journal of Education and Educational Development. 2017; 4 (1):111-129. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1161522.pdf
• 6. Dogan S. Model of values-based management process in schools: A mixed design study. International Journal of Higher Education. 2016; 5 (1):83-96
• 7. Bergman M. Advances in Mixed Methods Research: Theories and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2008
• 8. Takahiro N. Confucian modernity in Japan religion and the state. Journal of Japanese Philosophy. 2020; 6 (1):45-62
• 9. O’Dwyer S. Deflating the ‘Confucian Heritage Culture’ thesis in intercultural and academic English education. Language, Culture and Curriculum. 2017; 30 (2):198-211
• 10. Bahtilla M, Xu H. The influence of Confucius’s educational thoughts on China’s educational system. Open Access Library Journal. 2021; 8 (5):1-17
• 11. Abe H. Borrowing from Japan: China’s first modern educational system. In: China’s Education and the Industrialized World. London: Routledge; 2017. pp. 57-300
• 12. Chaika O, Lytvyniuk O, Trofymenko A, Zaluzhna O, Shepel Y. Fundamentals of poly-/multicultural education for a modern foreign language instructor in the system of their professional and personal growth. AD ALTA: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research. 2022; 11 (02 (Special Issue XXIV)):150-155
• 13. Bazaluk O. Plato’s traditions in modern educational theories. Analele Universității din Craiova. Seria Filosofie. 2019; 1 (43):5-20
• 14. Carpentier V. The history of higher education in modern Europe. In: Tamura EH, editor. The Oxford Handbook of the History of Education. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2019
• 15. Chicosky CL. Restructuring the modern education system in the United States: A look at the value of compulsory education laws. Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal. 2015; 2015 :7-20. Available from: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/elj/vol2015/iss1/2
• 16. Chaika O, Absaliamova Y, Marchuk V, Dovhaniuk E, Kolesnykov A. Poly- and multiculturalism underpinning personality formation of future foreign language teachers. Amazonia Investiga. 2022; 11 (52):221-231. Available from: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000806131700024
• 17. Biesta GJ. Why ‘what works’ still won’t work: From evidence-based education to value-based education. Studies in Philosophy and Education. 2010; 29 :491-503
• 18. Mathes EW. An evolutionary perspective on Kohlberg’s theory of moral development. Current Psychology. 2021; 40 (8):3908-3921
• 19. McKenzie M, Blenkinsop S. An ethic of care and educational practice. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning. 2006; 6 (2):91-105
• 20. Alsubaie MA. Examples of current issues in the multicultural classroom. Journal of Education and Practice. 2015; 6 (10):86-89
• 21. Chavan JR, Chavan SV. Human evolution–A key focus of transformational teacher. In: Knowledge Globalization Conference; Pune, India. Massachusetts, USA: Knowledge Globalization Institute LLC; 2012. pp. 275-285
• 22. Gilfoil DM, Focht JW. Value-based delivery of education: MOOCs as messengers. American Journal of Business Education. 2015; 8 (3):223-238
• 23. Rushton JP. Moral cognition, behaviorism, and social learning theory. Ethics. 1982; 92 (3):459-467
• 24. Cummings R, Harlow S. The constructivist roots of moral education. The Educational Forum. 2000; 64 (4):300-307
• 25. Halstead M, Taylor MJ. Values in Education and Education in Values. London, Washington, D.C.: The Falmer Press; 1996

© 2023 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Continue reading from the same book

Lifelong learning.

Published: 21 August 2024

By Filippo Gomez Paloma

38 downloads

By Patricia Fidalgo and Joan Thormann

326 downloads

By Hanneke Theelen, Milou De Smet, Dave Van Breukelen...

206 downloads

IntechOpen Author/Editor? To get your discount, log in .

Discounts available on purchase of multiple copies. View rates

Local taxes (VAT) are calculated in later steps, if applicable.

Support: [email protected]

You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience and security.

• Call: 1300 858 191
• Email: [email protected]
• Learner Portal
• JobAssist Portal
• Enrolments Open
• Certificate III
• Certificate IV
• Education Support Combo
• Teacher Aide Courses Overview
• Course Prospectus
• Study Modes
• Experienced Learner Pathway
• Work Placement
• Integrated Structure
• Course Preview
• Testimonials
• Student Handbook
• RPL & Credit
• Academic Engagement
• Dandjoo Support
• Campus & Locations
• Our Network
• Public Policies
• Legal & Accreditation

Education Support Resources

Traditional teaching and learning strategies

What actually works what is it why use it.

Traditional strategies – a range of strategies used by teachers in the past (some of which are no longer considered effective – some of which are used today in one way or another).

Traditional teaching strategies are a group of strategies that were used in the past that are now considered to be largely outdated. These strategies were the primary teaching methods employed in the early days of the modern education system (circa 1800 -1930s) when teachers were not required to undertake any form of teacher training. In fact, there was no real government interest or control over the education system in most countries until the last 100 years or so. Before that, parents paid the teacher if they thought the service was worth paying for. There were no classrooms or schools as we know them today and classes were held in churches, halls or outdoors.

Many of the strategies used in the past continue to be used in some way or another by teachers today.

Many of the teaching strategies used around this time involved highly repetitive (drill) tasks that emphasised memorisation (rote learning) while de-emphasising critical thinking, problem solving, metacognitive and social skills. Students spoke very little, the teacher spoke a lot, and behaviour management was often brutal by today’s standards.

Hint: while it is easy to shake our heads at what things were like in the past, bear in mind the context in which the education system was evolving. At the time, attending school was a luxury. It was only the Mines Act 1842 that banned women and boys under ten years old from working in coal mines in the UK. This wasn’t that long ago. Children as young as 5 and 6 worked in harrowing and dangerous conditions for 12 hours per day. Strangely, the Mines Act was passed just as much to uphold conservative Victorian-era beliefs about sexuality as it was to protect children from harm: girls worked topless in these mines which was considered highly improper and it made them potentially unmarriable. After public outcry, and once the upper echelons of the influential class learnt about these goings-on, the new laws were introduced not long afterwards.

However, there is another side to traditional teaching strategies that is often ignored and dismissed. Many of the strategies used in the past continue to be used in some way or another by teachers today. They have however been adapted to suit our current understanding and beliefs about what a quality education system looks like. For example, ‘look-cover-write-check’ is a modern version of rote learning how to spell words and to increase vocabulary. In the past, teachers had students write out words hundreds of times believing that method to be the best way to learn. Even if a student did happen to remember the unfamiliar word a few months later, it is unlikely that they would ever be able to use it correctly in any useful way outside of the classroom. These techniques can be thought of as experiments that paved the way for today’s best practice models of teaching.

The issue with rote learning is that students often don’t know how to use what they have learnt in a real context.

When people think about traditional teaching strategies, they often first think about drill and rote activities. A drill activity involves repeating something over and over in order to ‘get it right’ – usually something small and tedious such as a spelling word or a maths problem. Rote simply means to commit something to memory, usually by repetition. The issue with rote learning is that students often don’t know how to use what they have learnt in a real context. For example, students might rote learn a dozen or so spelling words. While they can spell these words initially – they struggle to use them when writing a sentence. Another issue with rote learning is that content is mostly stored in short-term memory – it isn’t until something is used in a real context that it gets committed to long-term memory. Therefore, rote and drill learning must be followed by other activities (practice activities, real world texts and multiple contexts).

Language teachers use drill and rote all the time. Students can only get better at pronouncing a word if they practise it a few times. Drill and rote are also common in phonics activities – repeating after the teacher for example. Students are often told to write out spelling mistakes 10 times. Important formulas or facts are memorised before an exam. Games, songs, revision and consolidation activities usually involve some form of drill and rote learning as well. However, while rote and drill activities persist today, they go by different names and have evolved tremendously from their predecessors. Strategies such as mnemonics, explicit teaching, direct instruction, spaced practice and purposeful practice share many elements with traditional rote and drill exercises.

We then come to the million-dollar question – should teachers use traditional or more modern methods in the classroom? High-performing teachers use a combination.

Another common feature of the traditional classroom is the teacher-centred approach. Modelling, presentations, shard learning and worked examples are all examples of teacher-centred activities. The antithesis to teacher-centred strategies are student-centred strategies which see the teacher facilitating more and ‘teaching’ less. Cooperative learning, discovery based learning and self-directed learning are well known examples of student-centred strategies.

In reality, the line between the 2 approaches is somewhat blurred and more philosophical than practical in many respects. Teachers combine aspects of multiple strategies. For example, worked examples usually involve a plethora of questions which encourage student participation and discussion. Discovery learning is also rarely 100% self-directed and teachers offer and provide regular support to students in more traditional ways (such as via shared and guided learning, scaffolding, chunking). In practice, high-performing teachers use a combination of teacher-centred and student-centred activities throughout most lessons. The question is not which type of strategy to use, but which strategy most likely allows students to meet today’s educational goals.

Hint: think traditional teaching methods such as modelling on the board or lecturing to students are no longer relevant? Think again! YouTube is educating a whole generation of learners (and many of those learners have rather negative views of the modern education system). In fact, a study showed that 51% of YouTube viewers were using the site to learn something. i At its core, YouTube is the quintessential example of a teacher-centred approach to learning – an expert has the floor 100% of the time and simply lectures the student on what they need to know.

A common criticism of traditional teaching strategies is that the curriculum is not differentiated (refer back to the differentiated instruction strategy outlined earlier in this book). This means that past teachers didn’t adjust the lesson or aspects of the lesson for students who were either struggling or advanced (either side of the bell curve). The lesson was aimed at the class as a whole and no allowances were made for individual abilities, understanding, background knowledge, interests, motivations, career aspirations, personality, learning styles or disabilities. Teachers today (including those who subscribe to more traditional methods) pay much more attention to the individual needs of learners, and in particular to those with disabilities and disorders.

We then come to the million-dollar question – should teachers use traditional or more modern methods in the classroom? High-performing teachers use a combination. For example, a teacher might present new information on the board using worked examples while asking students an array of questions. Students might participate in several drills to help them consolidate new information. The teacher may then schedule some individual work for a short period followed by a cooperative learning activity. The point is not to discriminate between different categories of teaching strategies and to blindly follow one or the other based on political or philosophical beliefs – best practice is to maximise the number of tools in your toolbelt and to strategically use each when the job demands it.

Over time, teachers develop their own teaching style in line with their idiosyncrasies, personality and the needs of their learners. This includes adapting and combining strategies: teacher-centred strategies can be made more student-centred and vice versa.

Foot notes:

• Smith, A., Toor, S., Kessel, P.V. (2018, November). Many Turn to YouTube for Children’s Content, Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/11/07/many-turn-to-youtube-for-childrens-content-news-how-to-lessons/.

Popular Posts

Pay and Salary?

Why Become a TA?

What do TAs do?

Literature Review

• Teaching Strategies & Methodologies (14)
• Behaviour Management & Student Support (2)
• Professional Development & Career Awareness (7)
• State-Specific Information (14)
• Compliance, Safety & Duty of Care (2)

Learn why 1000s of students Choose ITAC

Australia’s Most Popular Teacher Aide Course

Begin your journey: Start today with local support.

• Infrastructure

Pros And Cons Of Traditional Teaching: A Detailed Guide

Traditional teaching methods are often characterised by teacher-centred instruction. They focus on textbooks and lectures. They have been the predominant approach in education for many years.  Their effectiveness can vary depending on the context, subject matter, and individual learners.

So today, let’s learn if traditional teaching methods are the perfect fit for your child. Find out its advantages and drawbacks to choose the best for young learners.

What are the Advantages of Traditional Teaching Methods?

Traditional teaching methods are characterised by teacher-centred lectures, textbooks, and standardised assessments. They have been an educational mainstay for centuries. Let’s explore the advantages of traditional teaching methods.

• Structured Environment for Learning

Traditional methods provide a structured and organised learning environment for the students. The curriculum is often well-defined, and students follow a set schedule. It can create a sense of order and routine.

• Focuses on Foundational Skills

Traditional methods often emphasise core literacy and numeracy skills. They are essential for further academic success and real-world applications.

• Clear Authority of A Teacher

In traditional classrooms, the teacher typically holds a central and authoritative role. This clarity in authority can help maintain discipline. It also facilitates a focused learning atmosphere for students.

• Availability of Resources

Traditional teaching methods often rely on textbooks and other printed materials. They provide tangible resources that students can reference. This can be particularly helpful for students who prefer physical learning materials.

• Has A Proven Track Record

Traditional methods have been used successfully for many years. They have a proven track record of imparting knowledge and skills to generations of students. They establish a sense of familiarity for both educators and learners.

• Assessment is Easy

Assessment in traditional methods is often straightforward. It relies on quizzes, exams, and written assignments. This simplicity can make it easier for educators to evaluate students’ understanding of the material.

• Instruction is Teacher-Centered

Some students may benefit from a teacher-centred approach. There, the instructor takes a more active role in guiding the learning process. This can be especially effective for certain subjects. And also for learners who require more direction.

• Covers More Content

Traditional methods can be efficient in covering a large amount of content within a specified time frame. This is important in academic settings where there is a prescribed curriculum to follow.

What are the Disadvantages of Traditional Teaching Methods?

Traditional teaching methods offer the above advantages. But they also come with limitations in today’s evolving world. Let’s take a look at the disadvantages of traditional teaching methods.

• Student Engagement is Limited

Traditional methods can lead to passive learning. So students become recipients of information. And don’t be active participants in the learning process. This lack of engagement can hinder deeper understanding and retention.

• Lacks A Real-World Connection

Traditional methods often fail to connect learning to real-world applications. It makes it difficult for students to see the relevance of what they are learning.

• Lacks Personalisation

Traditional methods may not cater to individual learning styles and paces. Students come with diverse learning preferences and abilities. They may find it challenging to thrive in a one-size-fits-all approach.

• Contrasts Between Memorisation and Understanding

Traditional methods often emphasise memorisation. They focus on recalling facts. They don’t promote deeper understanding and critical thinking skills. This can result in surface-level comprehension. And may not be applicable in real-world scenarios.

• The use of Technology is Limited

Traditional teaching methods may not fully leverage the benefits of modern technology. It is an era where technology plays a significant role in various aspects of life. The limited integration of tech tools in traditional methods can be a disadvantage.

• Not Flexible

Traditional methods can be rigid and inflexible. They make it challenging to adapt to the evolving needs of learners. They don’t incorporate innovative teaching approaches. This lack of flexibility may hinder the development of creative and adaptable thinking.

• Has A Potential for Boredom

The lack of variety in traditional methods can lead to student boredom. Because the lessons primarily involve lectures and textbooks. So students may become disinterested, affecting their motivation and enthusiasm for learning.

• Overemphasises Grades

Traditional teaching methods often place a strong emphasis on grades and standardised testing. This focus can create a competitive atmosphere. It may lead to a prioritisation of grades over a genuine understanding of the material.

• Limited Emphasis on Life Skills

Traditional methods may not adequately address the development of essential life skills. It includes critical thinking, problem-solving, collaboration, and communication. These are increasingly valued in the modern world.

What is the Importance of Traditional Teaching Methods?

Traditional methods are not inherently bad. They can be effective in certain situations and in combination with other approaches. The effectiveness of any teaching method depends on the context, the teacher, and the students. What works for one may not work for another.

Education is evolving as new technologies and pedagogical approaches are emerging. It allows for more personalised, engaging, and relevant learning experiences. The key is to find a balance of approach. So, educators should utilise the strengths of traditional methods and incorporate innovative approaches. It meets the needs of today’s diverse learners and prepares them for the future.

Traditional teaching methods have been the foundation of education for many years. They have proven effective in certain contexts. However, there is a growing need for more student-centered, interactive, and adaptable approaches. The ideal teaching method at Billabong International High School involves a thoughtful combination. It combines traditional and innovative strategies. It is tailored to the specific needs and dynamics of the learning environment.

Latest Blogs

The future of education: promoting intellectual agility and ingenuity in young minds, understanding learning styles: making learning fun for children, yummy recipes for your toddler’s nutrition and brain development, the impact of digital revolution on education, how to improve handwriting: 5 essential tips.

Published on

Finding the Perfect Study Routine: Day or Night?

Admission enquiry.

By clicking on Submit, I allow all communication from Billabong High International School