write a good hypothesis that contains a dependent and independent variable

Research Variables 101

Independent variables, dependent variables, control variables and more

By: Derek Jansen (MBA) | Expert Reviewed By: Kerryn Warren (PhD) | January 2023

If you’re new to the world of research, especially scientific research, you’re bound to run into the concept of variables , sooner or later. If you’re feeling a little confused, don’t worry – you’re not the only one! Independent variables, dependent variables, confounding variables – it’s a lot of jargon. In this post, we’ll unpack the terminology surrounding research variables using straightforward language and loads of examples .

Overview: Variables In Research

What (exactly) is a variable?

The simplest way to understand a variable is as any characteristic or attribute that can experience change or vary over time or context – hence the name “variable”. For example, the dosage of a particular medicine could be classified as a variable, as the amount can vary (i.e., a higher dose or a lower dose). Similarly, gender, age or ethnicity could be considered demographic variables, because each person varies in these respects.

Within research, especially scientific research, variables form the foundation of studies, as researchers are often interested in how one variable impacts another, and the relationships between different variables. For example:

• How someone’s age impacts their sleep quality
• How different teaching methods impact learning outcomes
• How diet impacts weight (gain or loss)

As you can see, variables are often used to explain relationships between different elements and phenomena. In scientific studies, especially experimental studies, the objective is often to understand the causal relationships between variables. In other words, the role of cause and effect between variables. This is achieved by manipulating certain variables while controlling others – and then observing the outcome. But, we’ll get into that a little later…

The “Big 3” Variables

Variables can be a little intimidating for new researchers because there are a wide variety of variables, and oftentimes, there are multiple labels for the same thing. To lay a firm foundation, we’ll first look at the three main types of variables, namely:

• Independent variables (IV)
• Dependant variables (DV)
• Control variables

What is an independent variable?

Simply put, the independent variable is the “ cause ” in the relationship between two (or more) variables. In other words, when the independent variable changes, it has an impact on another variable.

For example:

• Increasing the dosage of a medication (Variable A) could result in better (or worse) health outcomes for a patient (Variable B)
• Changing a teaching method (Variable A) could impact the test scores that students earn in a standardised test (Variable B)
• Varying one’s diet (Variable A) could result in weight loss or gain (Variable B).

It’s useful to know that independent variables can go by a few different names, including, explanatory variables (because they explain an event or outcome) and predictor variables (because they predict the value of another variable). Terminology aside though, the most important takeaway is that independent variables are assumed to be the “cause” in any cause-effect relationship. As you can imagine, these types of variables are of major interest to researchers, as many studies seek to understand the causal factors behind a phenomenon.

Need a helping hand?

What is a dependent variable?

While the independent variable is the “ cause ”, the dependent variable is the “ effect ” – or rather, the affected variable . In other words, the dependent variable is the variable that is assumed to change as a result of a change in the independent variable.

Keeping with the previous example, let’s look at some dependent variables in action:

• Health outcomes (DV) could be impacted by dosage changes of a medication (IV)
• Students’ scores (DV) could be impacted by teaching methods (IV)
• Weight gain or loss (DV) could be impacted by diet (IV)

In scientific studies, researchers will typically pay very close attention to the dependent variable (or variables), carefully measuring any changes in response to hypothesised independent variables. This can be tricky in practice, as it’s not always easy to reliably measure specific phenomena or outcomes – or to be certain that the actual cause of the change is in fact the independent variable.

As the adage goes, correlation is not causation . In other words, just because two variables have a relationship doesn’t mean that it’s a causal relationship – they may just happen to vary together. For example, you could find a correlation between the number of people who own a certain brand of car and the number of people who have a certain type of job. Just because the number of people who own that brand of car and the number of people who have that type of job is correlated, it doesn’t mean that owning that brand of car causes someone to have that type of job or vice versa. The correlation could, for example, be caused by another factor such as income level or age group, which would affect both car ownership and job type.

To confidently establish a causal relationship between an independent variable and a dependent variable (i.e., X causes Y), you’ll typically need an experimental design , where you have complete control over the environmen t and the variables of interest. But even so, this doesn’t always translate into the “real world”. Simply put, what happens in the lab sometimes stays in the lab!

As an alternative to pure experimental research, correlational or “ quasi-experimental ” research (where the researcher cannot manipulate or change variables) can be done on a much larger scale more easily, allowing one to understand specific relationships in the real world. These types of studies also assume some causality between independent and dependent variables, but it’s not always clear. So, if you go this route, you need to be cautious in terms of how you describe the impact and causality between variables and be sure to acknowledge any limitations in your own research.

What is a control variable?

In an experimental design, a control variable (or controlled variable) is a variable that is intentionally held constant to ensure it doesn’t have an influence on any other variables. As a result, this variable remains unchanged throughout the course of the study. In other words, it’s a variable that’s not allowed to vary – tough life 🙂

As we mentioned earlier, one of the major challenges in identifying and measuring causal relationships is that it’s difficult to isolate the impact of variables other than the independent variable. Simply put, there’s always a risk that there are factors beyond the ones you’re specifically looking at that might be impacting the results of your study. So, to minimise the risk of this, researchers will attempt (as best possible) to hold other variables constant . These factors are then considered control variables.

Some examples of variables that you may need to control include:

• Temperature
• Time of day
• Noise or distractions

Which specific variables need to be controlled for will vary tremendously depending on the research project at hand, so there’s no generic list of control variables to consult. As a researcher, you’ll need to think carefully about all the factors that could vary within your research context and then consider how you’ll go about controlling them. A good starting point is to look at previous studies similar to yours and pay close attention to which variables they controlled for.

Of course, you won’t always be able to control every possible variable, and so, in many cases, you’ll just have to acknowledge their potential impact and account for them in the conclusions you draw. Every study has its limitations , so don’t get fixated or discouraged by troublesome variables. Nevertheless, always think carefully about the factors beyond what you’re focusing on – don’t make assumptions!

Other types of variables

As we mentioned, independent, dependent and control variables are the most common variables you’ll come across in your research, but they’re certainly not the only ones you need to be aware of. Next, we’ll look at a few “secondary” variables that you need to keep in mind as you design your research.

• Moderating variables
• Mediating variables
• Confounding variables
• Latent variables

Let’s jump into it…

What is a moderating variable?

A moderating variable is a variable that influences the strength or direction of the relationship between an independent variable and a dependent variable. In other words, moderating variables affect how much (or how little) the IV affects the DV, or whether the IV has a positive or negative relationship with the DV (i.e., moves in the same or opposite direction).

For example, in a study about the effects of sleep deprivation on academic performance, gender could be used as a moderating variable to see if there are any differences in how men and women respond to a lack of sleep. In such a case, one may find that gender has an influence on how much students’ scores suffer when they’re deprived of sleep.

It’s important to note that while moderators can have an influence on outcomes , they don’t necessarily cause them ; rather they modify or “moderate” existing relationships between other variables. This means that it’s possible for two different groups with similar characteristics, but different levels of moderation, to experience very different results from the same experiment or study design.

What is a mediating variable?

Mediating variables are often used to explain the relationship between the independent and dependent variable (s). For example, if you were researching the effects of age on job satisfaction, then education level could be considered a mediating variable, as it may explain why older people have higher job satisfaction than younger people – they may have more experience or better qualifications, which lead to greater job satisfaction.

Mediating variables also help researchers understand how different factors interact with each other to influence outcomes. For instance, if you wanted to study the effect of stress on academic performance, then coping strategies might act as a mediating factor by influencing both stress levels and academic performance simultaneously. For example, students who use effective coping strategies might be less stressed but also perform better academically due to their improved mental state.

In addition, mediating variables can provide insight into causal relationships between two variables by helping researchers determine whether changes in one factor directly cause changes in another – or whether there is an indirect relationship between them mediated by some third factor(s). For instance, if you wanted to investigate the impact of parental involvement on student achievement, you would need to consider family dynamics as a potential mediator, since it could influence both parental involvement and student achievement simultaneously.

What is a confounding variable?

A confounding variable (also known as a third variable or lurking variable ) is an extraneous factor that can influence the relationship between two variables being studied. Specifically, for a variable to be considered a confounding variable, it needs to meet two criteria:

• It must be correlated with the independent variable (this can be causal or not)
• It must have a causal impact on the dependent variable (i.e., influence the DV)

Some common examples of confounding variables include demographic factors such as gender, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, age, education level, and health status. In addition to these, there are also environmental factors to consider. For example, air pollution could confound the impact of the variables of interest in a study investigating health outcomes.

Naturally, it’s important to identify as many confounding variables as possible when conducting your research, as they can heavily distort the results and lead you to draw incorrect conclusions . So, always think carefully about what factors may have a confounding effect on your variables of interest and try to manage these as best you can.

What is a latent variable?

Latent variables are unobservable factors that can influence the behaviour of individuals and explain certain outcomes within a study. They’re also known as hidden or underlying variables , and what makes them rather tricky is that they can’t be directly observed or measured . Instead, latent variables must be inferred from other observable data points such as responses to surveys or experiments.

For example, in a study of mental health, the variable “resilience” could be considered a latent variable. It can’t be directly measured , but it can be inferred from measures of mental health symptoms, stress, and coping mechanisms. The same applies to a lot of concepts we encounter every day – for example:

• Emotional intelligence
• Quality of life
• Business confidence
• Ease of use

One way in which we overcome the challenge of measuring the immeasurable is latent variable models (LVMs). An LVM is a type of statistical model that describes a relationship between observed variables and one or more unobserved (latent) variables. These models allow researchers to uncover patterns in their data which may not have been visible before, thanks to their complexity and interrelatedness with other variables. Those patterns can then inform hypotheses about cause-and-effect relationships among those same variables which were previously unknown prior to running the LVM. Powerful stuff, we say!

Let’s recap

In the world of scientific research, there’s no shortage of variable types, some of which have multiple names and some of which overlap with each other. In this post, we’ve covered some of the popular ones, but remember that this is not an exhaustive list .

To recap, we’ve explored:

• Independent variables (the “cause”)
• Dependent variables (the “effect”)
• Control variables (the variable that’s not allowed to vary)

If you’re still feeling a bit lost and need a helping hand with your research project, check out our 1-on-1 coaching service , where we guide you through each step of the research journey. Also, be sure to check out our free dissertation writing course and our collection of free, fully-editable chapter templates .

Psst... there’s more!

This post was based on one of our popular Research Bootcamps . If you're working on a research project, you'll definitely want to check this out ...

Very informative, concise and helpful. Thank you

Helping information.Thanks

practical and well-demonstrated

Very helpful and insightful

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Print Friendly

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, automatically generate references for free.

• Knowledge Base
• Methodology
• How to Write a Strong Hypothesis | Guide & Examples

How to Write a Strong Hypothesis | Guide & Examples

Published on 6 May 2022 by Shona McCombes .

A hypothesis is a statement that can be tested by scientific research. If you want to test a relationship between two or more variables, you need to write hypotheses before you start your experiment or data collection.

Table of contents

What is a hypothesis, developing a hypothesis (with example), hypothesis examples, frequently asked questions about writing hypotheses.

A hypothesis states your predictions about what your research will find. It is a tentative answer to your research question that has not yet been tested. For some research projects, you might have to write several hypotheses that address different aspects of your research question.

A hypothesis is not just a guess – it should be based on existing theories and knowledge. It also has to be testable, which means you can support or refute it through scientific research methods (such as experiments, observations, and statistical analysis of data).

Variables in hypotheses

Hypotheses propose a relationship between two or more variables . An independent variable is something the researcher changes or controls. A dependent variable is something the researcher observes and measures.

In this example, the independent variable is exposure to the sun – the assumed cause . The dependent variable is the level of happiness – the assumed effect .

Prevent plagiarism, run a free check.

Step 1: ask a question.

Writing a hypothesis begins with a research question that you want to answer. The question should be focused, specific, and researchable within the constraints of your project.

Step 2: Do some preliminary research

Your initial answer to the question should be based on what is already known about the topic. Look for theories and previous studies to help you form educated assumptions about what your research will find.

At this stage, you might construct a conceptual framework to identify which variables you will study and what you think the relationships are between them. Sometimes, you’ll have to operationalise more complex constructs.

Step 3: Formulate your hypothesis

Now you should have some idea of what you expect to find. Write your initial answer to the question in a clear, concise sentence.

Step 4: Refine your hypothesis

You need to make sure your hypothesis is specific and testable. There are various ways of phrasing a hypothesis, but all the terms you use should have clear definitions, and the hypothesis should contain:

• The relevant variables
• The specific group being studied
• The predicted outcome of the experiment or analysis

Step 5: Phrase your hypothesis in three ways

To identify the variables, you can write a simple prediction in if … then form. The first part of the sentence states the independent variable and the second part states the dependent variable.

In academic research, hypotheses are more commonly phrased in terms of correlations or effects, where you directly state the predicted relationship between variables.

If you are comparing two groups, the hypothesis can state what difference you expect to find between them.

Step 6. Write a null hypothesis

If your research involves statistical hypothesis testing , you will also have to write a null hypothesis. The null hypothesis is the default position that there is no association between the variables. The null hypothesis is written as H 0 , while the alternative hypothesis is H 1 or H a .

Hypothesis testing is a formal procedure for investigating our ideas about the world using statistics. It is used by scientists to test specific predictions, called hypotheses , by calculating how likely it is that a pattern or relationship between variables could have arisen by chance.

A hypothesis is not just a guess. It should be based on existing theories and knowledge. It also has to be testable, which means you can support or refute it through scientific research methods (such as experiments, observations, and statistical analysis of data).

A research hypothesis is your proposed answer to your research question. The research hypothesis usually includes an explanation (‘ x affects y because …’).

A statistical hypothesis, on the other hand, is a mathematical statement about a population parameter. Statistical hypotheses always come in pairs: the null and alternative hypotheses. In a well-designed study , the statistical hypotheses correspond logically to the research hypothesis.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the ‘Cite this Scribbr article’ button to automatically add the citation to our free Reference Generator.

McCombes, S. (2022, May 06). How to Write a Strong Hypothesis | Guide & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved 12 August 2024, from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/research-methods/hypothesis-writing/

Is this article helpful?

Shona McCombes

Other students also liked, operationalisation | a guide with examples, pros & cons, what is a conceptual framework | tips & examples, a quick guide to experimental design | 5 steps & examples.

• Thesis Action Plan New
• Academic Project Planner

Literature Navigator

Thesis dialogue blueprint, writing wizard's template, research proposal compass.

• Why students love us
• Why professors love us
• Rebels Blog (Free)
• Why we are different
• All Products
• Coming Soon

What Makes a Good Hypothesis: Key Elements and Tips

Formulating a strong hypothesis is a fundamental step in the scientific method and essential for conducting meaningful research. A well-crafted hypothesis not only guides your research design but also ensures that your study is focused and testable. In this article, we will explore the key elements that make a good hypothesis and provide practical tips for developing one.

Key Takeaways

• A good hypothesis should be clear, precise, and testable.
• Understanding the role of independent, dependent, and control variables is crucial in hypothesis formulation.
• Preliminary research is essential for formulating a strong and informed hypothesis.
• Properly designed experiments and robust data collection methods are vital for testing and validating hypotheses.
• Ethical considerations, such as obtaining participant consent and maintaining data integrity, are important in hypothesis testing.

Defining a Good Hypothesis

A good hypothesis is a foundational element of any scientific research. It serves as a tentative explanation or prediction that can be tested through study and experimentation. Crafting a well-defined hypothesis is crucial for guiding your research and ensuring that your findings are valid and reliable.

The Role of Variables in Hypothesis Formulation

Understanding the role of variables is crucial in formulating a strong hypothesis. Variables are the elements that you manipulate, measure, and control in your research. They help establish the relationship between different factors and ensure that your hypothesis is testable and measurable.

Steps to Formulate a Strong Hypothesis

Formulating a strong hypothesis is a critical step in the research process. It involves several key stages that ensure your hypothesis is both testable and meaningful.

Testing and Validating Hypotheses

Designing experiments.

Designing experiments is a critical step in hypothesis testing. You must ensure that your experimental design is robust and capable of isolating the variables of interest. A well-designed experiment will allow you to draw clear conclusions about the relationship between the independent and dependent variables. Consider using control groups and randomization to minimize biases and enhance the validity of your results.

Data Collection Methods

Selecting appropriate data collection methods is essential for obtaining reliable and valid data. Depending on your research question, you might use surveys, experiments, or observational studies. Ensure that your data collection methods are consistent and repeatable to maintain the integrity of your data. Operational definitions of variables should be clear to avoid any ambiguity during data collection.

Analyzing Results

Once data is collected, the next step is to analyze the results. Statistical analysis helps in determining whether the data supports or refutes the hypothesis. Use appropriate statistical tests to evaluate the significance of your findings. Remember, the goal is to provide evidence that can either support or challenge your hypothesis. By rigorously analyzing your data, you contribute to the broader field of knowledge and help in the construct development and validation in your area of study.

Examples of Well-Formulated Hypotheses

Hypotheses in natural sciences.

In the natural sciences, hypotheses often predict relationships between variables based on empirical evidence. For instance, a hypothesis might state, "If the amount of sunlight is increased, then the growth rate of the plant will increase." This hypothesis is testable and clearly defines the independent variable (amount of sunlight) and the dependent variable (growth rate of the plant).

Hypotheses in Social Sciences

Social science hypotheses frequently address human behavior and societal trends. An example could be, "Individuals who experience higher levels of thesis anxiety are less likely to complete their thesis on time." This hypothesis is grounded in past knowledge and is designed to be tested through surveys or observational studies.

Hypotheses in Applied Research

Applied research often involves practical problem-solving. A well-formulated hypothesis in this field might be, "Implementing a new software tool will reduce the time required for data analysis by 20%." This hypothesis is specific, measurable, and directly applicable to real-world scenarios.

Theoretical Framework and Hypothesis Development

A robust theoretical framework is essential for developing a strong hypothesis. It serves as the foundation upon which your research is built, linking your research question to existing theories and literature. The importance of theoretical frameworks cannot be overstated, as they provide the context and rationale for your study, guiding the formulation of your hypothesis and ensuring it is grounded in established knowledge.

Ethical Considerations in Hypothesis Testing

When formulating and testing hypotheses, it is crucial to adhere to ethical standards to ensure the integrity and credibility of your research. Ethical considerations are not just about following rules; they are about respecting the dignity, rights, and welfare of participants and maintaining the trustworthiness of your findings.

Ethical considerations in hypothesis testing are crucial for maintaining the integrity and credibility of research. Researchers must ensure that their methods are transparent, their data is accurately reported, and their conclusions are drawn without bias. For students embarking on their thesis journey, understanding these ethical principles is essential. At Research Rebels, we provide comprehensive guides and resources to help you navigate these challenges effectively. Claim your special offer now and take the first step towards a stress-free thesis experience.

In conclusion, crafting a good hypothesis is a fundamental step in the scientific research process. A well-constructed hypothesis not only provides a clear direction for research but also ensures that the study is grounded in empirical evidence and theoretical frameworks. Key elements of a good hypothesis include clarity, testability, and specificity, all of which contribute to the robustness and reliability of the research findings. By adhering to these principles, researchers can formulate hypotheses that are both meaningful and impactful, ultimately advancing knowledge in their respective fields. As we have discussed, the process of developing a hypothesis involves careful consideration and refinement, underscoring the importance of precision and critical thinking in scientific inquiry.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a hypothesis.

A hypothesis is a testable statement that predicts an outcome based on certain conditions or variables. It serves as a starting point for scientific research.

Why is clarity important in formulating a hypothesis?

Clarity ensures that the hypothesis is easily understood and can be tested accurately. A clear hypothesis helps in designing appropriate experiments and in interpreting results correctly.

What are independent and dependent variables?

Independent variables are the factors that are manipulated or changed in an experiment, while dependent variables are the outcomes that are measured to see the effect of the independent variables.

How do I refine my hypothesis?

Refining a hypothesis involves reviewing preliminary research, seeking feedback, and conducting initial tests. This process helps in making the hypothesis more precise and testable.

What are some common pitfalls to avoid when formulating a hypothesis?

Common pitfalls include being too vague, making untestable statements, and not basing the hypothesis on existing research or theory. Avoiding these pitfalls can lead to a stronger and more reliable hypothesis.

Why are control variables important in hypothesis testing?

Control variables are important because they help to isolate the effect of the independent variable on the dependent variable. By keeping control variables constant, researchers can ensure that any observed changes are due to the manipulation of the independent variable.

How To Conduct A Systematic Review and Write-Up in 7 Steps (Using PRISMA, PICO and AI)

Mastering the Art: How to Write the Thesis Statement of a Research Paper

Cómo escribir una propuesta de investigación para un doctorado

Cómo redactar una revisión de literatura para tu tesis

Cómo escribir una buena tesis: Guía paso a paso

From Idea to Proposal: 6 Steps to Efficiently Plan Your Research Project in 2024

Three Months to a Perfect Bachelor Thesis: A Detailed Plan for Students

Conquering Bibliography Fears: Mastering Citations in Thesis Writing

Maintaining a Healthy Diet: 9 Tips for Busy Student Life

Mastering Presentation Skills: Expert Tips for Engaging Talks

Thesis Action Plan

• Rebels Blog
• Blog Articles
• Affiliate Program
• Terms and Conditions
• Payment and Shipping Terms
• Privacy Policy
• Return Policy

© 2024 Research Rebels, All rights reserved.

Your cart is currently empty.

Educational resources and simple solutions for your research journey

What is a Research Hypothesis: How to Write it, Types, and Examples

Any research begins with a research question and a research hypothesis . A research question alone may not suffice to design the experiment(s) needed to answer it. A hypothesis is central to the scientific method. But what is a hypothesis ? A hypothesis is a testable statement that proposes a possible explanation to a phenomenon, and it may include a prediction. Next, you may ask what is a research hypothesis ? Simply put, a research hypothesis is a prediction or educated guess about the relationship between the variables that you want to investigate.  

It is important to be thorough when developing your research hypothesis. Shortcomings in the framing of a hypothesis can affect the study design and the results. A better understanding of the research hypothesis definition and characteristics of a good hypothesis will make it easier for you to develop your own hypothesis for your research. Let’s dive in to know more about the types of research hypothesis , how to write a research hypothesis , and some research hypothesis examples .  

Table of Contents

What is a hypothesis ?  

A hypothesis is based on the existing body of knowledge in a study area. Framed before the data are collected, a hypothesis states the tentative relationship between independent and dependent variables, along with a prediction of the outcome.  

What is a research hypothesis ?  

Young researchers starting out their journey are usually brimming with questions like “ What is a hypothesis ?” “ What is a research hypothesis ?” “How can I write a good research hypothesis ?”   

A research hypothesis is a statement that proposes a possible explanation for an observable phenomenon or pattern. It guides the direction of a study and predicts the outcome of the investigation. A research hypothesis is testable, i.e., it can be supported or disproven through experimentation or observation.     

Characteristics of a good hypothesis  

Here are the characteristics of a good hypothesis :  

• Clearly formulated and free of language errors and ambiguity  
• Concise and not unnecessarily verbose  
• Has clearly defined variables  
• Testable and stated in a way that allows for it to be disproven  
• Can be tested using a research design that is feasible, ethical, and practical   
• Specific and relevant to the research problem  
• Rooted in a thorough literature search  
• Can generate new knowledge or understanding.  

How to create an effective research hypothesis  

A study begins with the formulation of a research question. A researcher then performs background research. This background information forms the basis for building a good research hypothesis . The researcher then performs experiments, collects, and analyzes the data, interprets the findings, and ultimately, determines if the findings support or negate the original hypothesis.  

Let’s look at each step for creating an effective, testable, and good research hypothesis :  

• Identify a research problem or question: Start by identifying a specific research problem.   
• Review the literature: Conduct an in-depth review of the existing literature related to the research problem to grasp the current knowledge and gaps in the field.   
• Formulate a clear and testable hypothesis : Based on the research question, use existing knowledge to form a clear and testable hypothesis . The hypothesis should state a predicted relationship between two or more variables that can be measured and manipulated. Improve the original draft till it is clear and meaningful.  
• State the null hypothesis: The null hypothesis is a statement that there is no relationship between the variables you are studying.   
• Define the population and sample: Clearly define the population you are studying and the sample you will be using for your research.  
• Select appropriate methods for testing the hypothesis: Select appropriate research methods, such as experiments, surveys, or observational studies, which will allow you to test your research hypothesis .  

Remember that creating a research hypothesis is an iterative process, i.e., you might have to revise it based on the data you collect. You may need to test and reject several hypotheses before answering the research problem.  

How to write a research hypothesis  

When you start writing a research hypothesis , you use an “if–then” statement format, which states the predicted relationship between two or more variables. Clearly identify the independent variables (the variables being changed) and the dependent variables (the variables being measured), as well as the population you are studying. Review and revise your hypothesis as needed.  

An example of a research hypothesis in this format is as follows:  

“ If [athletes] follow [cold water showers daily], then their [endurance] increases.”  

Population: athletes  

Independent variable: daily cold water showers  

Dependent variable: endurance  

You may have understood the characteristics of a good hypothesis . But note that a research hypothesis is not always confirmed; a researcher should be prepared to accept or reject the hypothesis based on the study findings.  

Research hypothesis checklist  

Following from above, here is a 10-point checklist for a good research hypothesis :  

• Testable: A research hypothesis should be able to be tested via experimentation or observation.  
• Specific: A research hypothesis should clearly state the relationship between the variables being studied.  
• Based on prior research: A research hypothesis should be based on existing knowledge and previous research in the field.  
• Falsifiable: A research hypothesis should be able to be disproven through testing.  
• Clear and concise: A research hypothesis should be stated in a clear and concise manner.  
• Logical: A research hypothesis should be logical and consistent with current understanding of the subject.  
• Relevant: A research hypothesis should be relevant to the research question and objectives.  
• Feasible: A research hypothesis should be feasible to test within the scope of the study.  
• Reflects the population: A research hypothesis should consider the population or sample being studied.  
• Uncomplicated: A good research hypothesis is written in a way that is easy for the target audience to understand.  

By following this research hypothesis checklist , you will be able to create a research hypothesis that is strong, well-constructed, and more likely to yield meaningful results.  

Types of research hypothesis  

Different types of research hypothesis are used in scientific research:  

1. Null hypothesis:

A null hypothesis states that there is no change in the dependent variable due to changes to the independent variable. This means that the results are due to chance and are not significant. A null hypothesis is denoted as H0 and is stated as the opposite of what the alternative hypothesis states.   

Example: “ The newly identified virus is not zoonotic .”  

2. Alternative hypothesis:

This states that there is a significant difference or relationship between the variables being studied. It is denoted as H1 or Ha and is usually accepted or rejected in favor of the null hypothesis.  

Example: “ The newly identified virus is zoonotic .”  

3. Directional hypothesis :

This specifies the direction of the relationship or difference between variables; therefore, it tends to use terms like increase, decrease, positive, negative, more, or less.   

Example: “ The inclusion of intervention X decreases infant mortality compared to the original treatment .”   

4. Non-directional hypothesis:

While it does not predict the exact direction or nature of the relationship between the two variables, a non-directional hypothesis states the existence of a relationship or difference between variables but not the direction, nature, or magnitude of the relationship. A non-directional hypothesis may be used when there is no underlying theory or when findings contradict previous research.  

Example, “ Cats and dogs differ in the amount of affection they express .”  

5. Simple hypothesis :

A simple hypothesis only predicts the relationship between one independent and another independent variable.  

Example: “ Applying sunscreen every day slows skin aging .”  

6 . Complex hypothesis :

A complex hypothesis states the relationship or difference between two or more independent and dependent variables.   

Example: “ Applying sunscreen every day slows skin aging, reduces sun burn, and reduces the chances of skin cancer .” (Here, the three dependent variables are slowing skin aging, reducing sun burn, and reducing the chances of skin cancer.)  

7. Associative hypothesis:  

An associative hypothesis states that a change in one variable results in the change of the other variable. The associative hypothesis defines interdependency between variables.  

Example: “ There is a positive association between physical activity levels and overall health .”  

8 . Causal hypothesis:

A causal hypothesis proposes a cause-and-effect interaction between variables.  

Example: “ Long-term alcohol use causes liver damage .”  

Note that some of the types of research hypothesis mentioned above might overlap. The types of hypothesis chosen will depend on the research question and the objective of the study.  

Research hypothesis examples  

Here are some good research hypothesis examples :  

“The use of a specific type of therapy will lead to a reduction in symptoms of depression in individuals with a history of major depressive disorder.”  

“Providing educational interventions on healthy eating habits will result in weight loss in overweight individuals.”  

“Plants that are exposed to certain types of music will grow taller than those that are not exposed to music.”  

“The use of the plant growth regulator X will lead to an increase in the number of flowers produced by plants.”  

Characteristics that make a research hypothesis weak are unclear variables, unoriginality, being too general or too vague, and being untestable. A weak hypothesis leads to weak research and improper methods.   

Some bad research hypothesis examples (and the reasons why they are “bad”) are as follows:  

“This study will show that treatment X is better than any other treatment . ” (This statement is not testable, too broad, and does not consider other treatments that may be effective.)  

“This study will prove that this type of therapy is effective for all mental disorders . ” (This statement is too broad and not testable as mental disorders are complex and different disorders may respond differently to different types of therapy.)  

“Plants can communicate with each other through telepathy . ” (This statement is not testable and lacks a scientific basis.)  

Importance of testable hypothesis  

If a research hypothesis is not testable, the results will not prove or disprove anything meaningful. The conclusions will be vague at best. A testable hypothesis helps a researcher focus on the study outcome and understand the implication of the question and the different variables involved. A testable hypothesis helps a researcher make precise predictions based on prior research.  

To be considered testable, there must be a way to prove that the hypothesis is true or false; further, the results of the hypothesis must be reproducible.  

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on research hypothesis  

1. What is the difference between research question and research hypothesis ?  

A research question defines the problem and helps outline the study objective(s). It is an open-ended statement that is exploratory or probing in nature. Therefore, it does not make predictions or assumptions. It helps a researcher identify what information to collect. A research hypothesis , however, is a specific, testable prediction about the relationship between variables. Accordingly, it guides the study design and data analysis approach.

2. When to reject null hypothesis ?

A null hypothesis should be rejected when the evidence from a statistical test shows that it is unlikely to be true. This happens when the test statistic (e.g., p -value) is less than the defined significance level (e.g., 0.05). Rejecting the null hypothesis does not necessarily mean that the alternative hypothesis is true; it simply means that the evidence found is not compatible with the null hypothesis.  

3. How can I be sure my hypothesis is testable?  

A testable hypothesis should be specific and measurable, and it should state a clear relationship between variables that can be tested with data. To ensure that your hypothesis is testable, consider the following:  

• Clearly define the key variables in your hypothesis. You should be able to measure and manipulate these variables in a way that allows you to test the hypothesis.  
• The hypothesis should predict a specific outcome or relationship between variables that can be measured or quantified.   
• You should be able to collect the necessary data within the constraints of your study.  
• It should be possible for other researchers to replicate your study, using the same methods and variables.   
• Your hypothesis should be testable by using appropriate statistical analysis techniques, so you can draw conclusions, and make inferences about the population from the sample data.  
• The hypothesis should be able to be disproven or rejected through the collection of data.  

4. How do I revise my research hypothesis if my data does not support it?  

If your data does not support your research hypothesis , you will need to revise it or develop a new one. You should examine your data carefully and identify any patterns or anomalies, re-examine your research question, and/or revisit your theory to look for any alternative explanations for your results. Based on your review of the data, literature, and theories, modify your research hypothesis to better align it with the results you obtained. Use your revised hypothesis to guide your research design and data collection. It is important to remain objective throughout the process.  

5. I am performing exploratory research. Do I need to formulate a research hypothesis?  

As opposed to “confirmatory” research, where a researcher has some idea about the relationship between the variables under investigation, exploratory research (or hypothesis-generating research) looks into a completely new topic about which limited information is available. Therefore, the researcher will not have any prior hypotheses. In such cases, a researcher will need to develop a post-hoc hypothesis. A post-hoc research hypothesis is generated after these results are known.  

6. How is a research hypothesis different from a research question?

A research question is an inquiry about a specific topic or phenomenon, typically expressed as a question. It seeks to explore and understand a particular aspect of the research subject. In contrast, a research hypothesis is a specific statement or prediction that suggests an expected relationship between variables. It is formulated based on existing knowledge or theories and guides the research design and data analysis.

7. Can a research hypothesis change during the research process?

Yes, research hypotheses can change during the research process. As researchers collect and analyze data, new insights and information may emerge that require modification or refinement of the initial hypotheses. This can be due to unexpected findings, limitations in the original hypotheses, or the need to explore additional dimensions of the research topic. Flexibility is crucial in research, allowing for adaptation and adjustment of hypotheses to align with the evolving understanding of the subject matter.

8. How many hypotheses should be included in a research study?

The number of research hypotheses in a research study varies depending on the nature and scope of the research. It is not necessary to have multiple hypotheses in every study. Some studies may have only one primary hypothesis, while others may have several related hypotheses. The number of hypotheses should be determined based on the research objectives, research questions, and the complexity of the research topic. It is important to ensure that the hypotheses are focused, testable, and directly related to the research aims.

9. Can research hypotheses be used in qualitative research?

Yes, research hypotheses can be used in qualitative research, although they are more commonly associated with quantitative research. In qualitative research, hypotheses may be formulated as tentative or exploratory statements that guide the investigation. Instead of testing hypotheses through statistical analysis, qualitative researchers may use the hypotheses to guide data collection and analysis, seeking to uncover patterns, themes, or relationships within the qualitative data. The emphasis in qualitative research is often on generating insights and understanding rather than confirming or rejecting specific research hypotheses through statistical testing.

Editage All Access is a subscription-based platform that unifies the best AI tools and services designed to speed up, simplify, and streamline every step of a researcher’s journey. The Editage All Access Pack is a one-of-a-kind subscription that unlocks full access to an AI writing assistant, literature recommender, journal finder, scientific illustration tool, and exclusive discounts on professional publication services from Editage.  

Based on 22+ years of experience in academia, Editage All Access empowers researchers to put their best research forward and move closer to success. Explore our top AI Tools pack, AI Tools + Publication Services pack, or Build Your Own Plan. Find everything a researcher needs to succeed, all in one place –  Get All Access now starting at just $14 a month !    

Related Posts

What is IMRaD Format in Research?

What is a Review Article? How to Write it?

How to Write a Research Hypothesis

• Research Process
• Peer Review

Since grade school, we've all been familiar with hypotheses. The hypothesis is an essential step of the scientific method. But what makes an effective research hypothesis, how do you create one, and what types of hypotheses are there? We answer these questions and more.

Updated on April 27, 2022

What is a research hypothesis?

General hypothesis.

Since grade school, we've all been familiar with the term “hypothesis.” A hypothesis is a fact-based guess or prediction that has not been proven. It is an essential step of the scientific method. The hypothesis of a study is a drive for experimentation to either prove the hypothesis or dispute it.

Research Hypothesis

A research hypothesis is more specific than a general hypothesis. It is an educated, expected prediction of the outcome of a study that is testable.

What makes an effective research hypothesis?

A good research hypothesis is a clear statement of the relationship between a dependent variable(s) and independent variable(s) relevant to the study that can be disproven.

Research hypothesis checklist

Once you've written a possible hypothesis, make sure it checks the following boxes:

• It must be testable: You need a means to prove your hypothesis. If you can't test it, it's not a hypothesis.
• It must include a dependent and independent variable: At least one independent variable ( cause ) and one dependent variable ( effect ) must be included.
• The language must be easy to understand: Be as clear and concise as possible. Nothing should be left to interpretation.
• It must be relevant to your research topic: You probably shouldn't be talking about cats and dogs if your research topic is outer space. Stay relevant to your topic.

How to create an effective research hypothesis

Pose it as a question first.

Start your research hypothesis from a journalistic approach. Ask one of the five W's: Who, what, when, where, or why.

A possible initial question could be: Why is the sky blue?

Do the preliminary research

Once you have a question in mind, read research around your topic. Collect research from academic journals.

If you're looking for information about the sky and why it is blue, research information about the atmosphere, weather, space, the sun, etc.

Write a draft hypothesis

Once you're comfortable with your subject and have preliminary knowledge, create a working hypothesis. Don't stress much over this. Your first hypothesis is not permanent. Look at it as a draft.

Your first draft of a hypothesis could be: Certain molecules in the Earth's atmosphere are responsive to the sky being the color blue.

Make your working draft perfect

Take your working hypothesis and make it perfect. Narrow it down to include only the information listed in the “Research hypothesis checklist” above.

Now that you've written your working hypothesis, narrow it down. Your new hypothesis could be: Light from the sun hitting oxygen molecules in the sky makes the color of the sky appear blue.

Write a null hypothesis

Your null hypothesis should be the opposite of your research hypothesis. It should be able to be disproven by your research.

In this example, your null hypothesis would be: Light from the sun hitting oxygen molecules in the sky does not make the color of the sky appear blue.

Why is it important to have a clear, testable hypothesis?

One of the main reasons a manuscript can be rejected from a journal is because of a weak hypothesis. “Poor hypothesis, study design, methodology, and improper use of statistics are other reasons for rejection of a manuscript,” says Dr. Ish Kumar Dhammi and Dr. Rehan-Ul-Haq in Indian Journal of Orthopaedics.

According to Dr. James M. Provenzale in American Journal of Roentgenology , “The clear declaration of a research question (or hypothesis) in the Introduction is critical for reviewers to understand the intent of the research study. It is best to clearly state the study goal in plain language (for example, “We set out to determine whether condition x produces condition y.”) An insufficient problem statement is one of the more common reasons for manuscript rejection.”

Characteristics that make a hypothesis weak include:

• Unclear variables
• Unoriginality
• Too general
• Too specific

A weak hypothesis leads to weak research and methods . The goal of a paper is to prove or disprove a hypothesis - or to prove or disprove a null hypothesis. If the hypothesis is not a dependent variable of what is being studied, the paper's methods should come into question.

A strong hypothesis is essential to the scientific method. A hypothesis states an assumed relationship between at least two variables and the experiment then proves or disproves that relationship with statistical significance. Without a proven and reproducible relationship, the paper feeds into the reproducibility crisis. Learn more about writing for reproducibility .

In a study published in The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India by Dr. Suvarna Satish Khadilkar, she reviewed 400 rejected manuscripts to see why they were rejected. Her studies revealed that poor methodology was a top reason for the submission having a final disposition of rejection.

Aside from publication chances, Dr. Gareth Dyke believes a clear hypothesis helps efficiency.

“Developing a clear and testable hypothesis for your research project means that you will not waste time, energy, and money with your work,” said Dyke. “Refining a hypothesis that is both meaningful, interesting, attainable, and testable is the goal of all effective research.”

Types of research hypotheses

There can be overlap in these types of hypotheses.

Simple hypothesis

A simple hypothesis is a hypothesis at its most basic form. It shows the relationship of one independent and one independent variable.

Example: Drinking soda (independent variable) every day leads to obesity (dependent variable).

Complex hypothesis

A complex hypothesis shows the relationship of two or more independent and dependent variables.

Example: Drinking soda (independent variable) every day leads to obesity (dependent variable) and heart disease (dependent variable).

Directional hypothesis

A directional hypothesis guesses which way the results of an experiment will go. It uses words like increase, decrease, higher, lower, positive, negative, more, or less. It is also frequently used in statistics.

Example: Humans exposed to radiation have a higher risk of cancer than humans not exposed to radiation.

Non-directional hypothesis

A non-directional hypothesis says there will be an effect on the dependent variable, but it does not say which direction.

Associative hypothesis

An associative hypothesis says that when one variable changes, so does the other variable.

Alternative hypothesis

An alternative hypothesis states that the variables have a relationship.

• The opposite of a null hypothesis

Example: An apple a day keeps the doctor away.

Null hypothesis

A null hypothesis states that there is no relationship between the two variables. It is posed as the opposite of what the alternative hypothesis states.

Researchers use a null hypothesis to work to be able to reject it. A null hypothesis:

• Can never be proven
• Can only be rejected
• Is the opposite of an alternative hypothesis

Example: An apple a day does not keep the doctor away.

Logical hypothesis

A logical hypothesis is a suggested explanation while using limited evidence.

Example: Bats can navigate in the dark better than tigers.

In this hypothesis, the researcher knows that tigers cannot see in the dark, and bats mostly live in darkness.

Empirical hypothesis

An empirical hypothesis is also called a “working hypothesis.” It uses the trial and error method and changes around the independent variables.

• An apple a day keeps the doctor away.
• Two apples a day keep the doctor away.
• Three apples a day keep the doctor away.

In this case, the research changes the hypothesis as the researcher learns more about his/her research.

Statistical hypothesis

A statistical hypothesis is a look of a part of a population or statistical model. This type of hypothesis is especially useful if you are making a statement about a large population. Instead of having to test the entire population of Illinois, you could just use a smaller sample of people who live there.

Example: 70% of people who live in Illinois are iron deficient.

Causal hypothesis

A causal hypothesis states that the independent variable will have an effect on the dependent variable.

Example: Using tobacco products causes cancer.

Final thoughts

Make sure your research is error-free before you send it to your preferred journal . Check our our English Editing services to avoid your chances of desk rejection.

Jonny Rhein, BA

See our "Privacy Policy"

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base

Methodology

• Independent vs. Dependent Variables | Definition & Examples

Independent vs. Dependent Variables | Definition & Examples

Published on February 3, 2022 by Pritha Bhandari . Revised on June 22, 2023.

In research, variables are any characteristics that can take on different values, such as height, age, temperature, or test scores.

Researchers often manipulate or measure independent and dependent variables in studies to test cause-and-effect relationships.

• The independent variable is the cause. Its value is independent of other variables in your study.
• The dependent variable is the effect. Its value depends on changes in the independent variable.

Your independent variable is the temperature of the room. You vary the room temperature by making it cooler for half the participants, and warmer for the other half.

Table of contents

What is an independent variable, types of independent variables, what is a dependent variable, identifying independent vs. dependent variables, independent and dependent variables in research, visualizing independent and dependent variables, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about independent and dependent variables.

An independent variable is the variable you manipulate or vary in an experimental study to explore its effects. It’s called “independent” because it’s not influenced by any other variables in the study.

Independent variables are also called:

• Explanatory variables (they explain an event or outcome)
• Predictor variables (they can be used to predict the value of a dependent variable)
• Right-hand-side variables (they appear on the right-hand side of a regression equation).

These terms are especially used in statistics , where you estimate the extent to which an independent variable change can explain or predict changes in the dependent variable.

Prevent plagiarism. Run a free check.

There are two main types of independent variables.

• Experimental independent variables can be directly manipulated by researchers.
• Subject variables cannot be manipulated by researchers, but they can be used to group research subjects categorically.

Experimental variables

In experiments, you manipulate independent variables directly to see how they affect your dependent variable. The independent variable is usually applied at different levels to see how the outcomes differ.

You can apply just two levels in order to find out if an independent variable has an effect at all.

You can also apply multiple levels to find out how the independent variable affects the dependent variable.

You have three independent variable levels, and each group gets a different level of treatment.

You randomly assign your patients to one of the three groups:

• A low-dose experimental group
• A high-dose experimental group
• A placebo group (to research a possible placebo effect )

A true experiment requires you to randomly assign different levels of an independent variable to your participants.

Random assignment helps you control participant characteristics, so that they don’t affect your experimental results. This helps you to have confidence that your dependent variable results come solely from the independent variable manipulation.

Subject variables

Subject variables are characteristics that vary across participants, and they can’t be manipulated by researchers. For example, gender identity, ethnicity, race, income, and education are all important subject variables that social researchers treat as independent variables.

It’s not possible to randomly assign these to participants, since these are characteristics of already existing groups. Instead, you can create a research design where you compare the outcomes of groups of participants with characteristics. This is a quasi-experimental design because there’s no random assignment. Note that any research methods that use non-random assignment are at risk for research biases like selection bias and sampling bias .

Your independent variable is a subject variable, namely the gender identity of the participants. You have three groups: men, women and other.

Your dependent variable is the brain activity response to hearing infant cries. You record brain activity with fMRI scans when participants hear infant cries without their awareness.

A dependent variable is the variable that changes as a result of the independent variable manipulation. It’s the outcome you’re interested in measuring, and it “depends” on your independent variable.

In statistics , dependent variables are also called:

• Response variables (they respond to a change in another variable)
• Outcome variables (they represent the outcome you want to measure)
• Left-hand-side variables (they appear on the left-hand side of a regression equation)

The dependent variable is what you record after you’ve manipulated the independent variable. You use this measurement data to check whether and to what extent your independent variable influences the dependent variable by conducting statistical analyses.

Based on your findings, you can estimate the degree to which your independent variable variation drives changes in your dependent variable. You can also predict how much your dependent variable will change as a result of variation in the independent variable.

Distinguishing between independent and dependent variables can be tricky when designing a complex study or reading an academic research paper .

A dependent variable from one study can be the independent variable in another study, so it’s important to pay attention to research design .

Here are some tips for identifying each variable type.

Recognizing independent variables

Use this list of questions to check whether you’re dealing with an independent variable:

• Is the variable manipulated, controlled, or used as a subject grouping method by the researcher?
• Does this variable come before the other variable in time?
• Is the researcher trying to understand whether or how this variable affects another variable?

Recognizing dependent variables

Check whether you’re dealing with a dependent variable:

• Is this variable measured as an outcome of the study?
• Is this variable dependent on another variable in the study?
• Does this variable get measured only after other variables are altered?

Receive feedback on language, structure, and formatting

Professional editors proofread and edit your paper by focusing on:

• Academic style
• Vague sentences
• Style consistency

See an example

Independent and dependent variables are generally used in experimental and quasi-experimental research.

Here are some examples of research questions and corresponding independent and dependent variables.

For experimental data, you analyze your results by generating descriptive statistics and visualizing your findings. Then, you select an appropriate statistical test to test your hypothesis .

The type of test is determined by:

• your variable types
• level of measurement
• number of independent variable levels.

You’ll often use t tests or ANOVAs to analyze your data and answer your research questions.

In quantitative research , it’s good practice to use charts or graphs to visualize the results of studies. Generally, the independent variable goes on the x -axis (horizontal) and the dependent variable on the y -axis (vertical).

The type of visualization you use depends on the variable types in your research questions:

• A bar chart is ideal when you have a categorical independent variable.
• A scatter plot or line graph is best when your independent and dependent variables are both quantitative.

To inspect your data, you place your independent variable of treatment level on the x -axis and the dependent variable of blood pressure on the y -axis.

You plot bars for each treatment group before and after the treatment to show the difference in blood pressure.

If you want to know more about statistics , methodology , or research bias , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

• Normal distribution
• Degrees of freedom
• Null hypothesis
• Discourse analysis
• Control groups
• Mixed methods research
• Non-probability sampling
• Quantitative research
• Ecological validity

Research bias

• Rosenthal effect
• Implicit bias
• Cognitive bias
• Selection bias
• Negativity bias
• Status quo bias

An independent variable is the variable you manipulate, control, or vary in an experimental study to explore its effects. It’s called “independent” because it’s not influenced by any other variables in the study.

A dependent variable is what changes as a result of the independent variable manipulation in experiments . It’s what you’re interested in measuring, and it “depends” on your independent variable.

In statistics, dependent variables are also called:

Determining cause and effect is one of the most important parts of scientific research. It’s essential to know which is the cause – the independent variable – and which is the effect – the dependent variable.

You want to find out how blood sugar levels are affected by drinking diet soda and regular soda, so you conduct an experiment .

• The type of soda – diet or regular – is the independent variable .
• The level of blood sugar that you measure is the dependent variable – it changes depending on the type of soda.

No. The value of a dependent variable depends on an independent variable, so a variable cannot be both independent and dependent at the same time. It must be either the cause or the effect, not both!

Yes, but including more than one of either type requires multiple research questions .

For example, if you are interested in the effect of a diet on health, you can use multiple measures of health: blood sugar, blood pressure, weight, pulse, and many more. Each of these is its own dependent variable with its own research question.

You could also choose to look at the effect of exercise levels as well as diet, or even the additional effect of the two combined. Each of these is a separate independent variable .

To ensure the internal validity of an experiment , you should only change one independent variable at a time.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

Bhandari, P. (2023, June 22). Independent vs. Dependent Variables | Definition & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved August 12, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/independent-and-dependent-variables/

Is this article helpful?

Pritha Bhandari

Other students also liked, guide to experimental design | overview, steps, & examples, explanatory and response variables | definitions & examples, confounding variables | definition, examples & controls, what is your plagiarism score.

Choose Your Test

• Search Blogs By Category
• College Admissions
• AP and IB Exams
• GPA and Coursework

What Is a Hypothesis and How Do I Write One?

General Education

Think about something strange and unexplainable in your life. Maybe you get a headache right before it rains, or maybe you think your favorite sports team wins when you wear a certain color. If you wanted to see whether these are just coincidences or scientific fact, you would form a hypothesis, then create an experiment to see whether that hypothesis is true or not.

But what is a hypothesis, anyway? If you’re not sure about what a hypothesis is--or how to test for one!--you’re in the right place. This article will teach you everything you need to know about hypotheses, including: 

• Defining the term “hypothesis” 
• Providing hypothesis examples 
• Giving you tips for how to write your own hypothesis

So let’s get started!

What Is a Hypothesis?

Merriam Webster defines a hypothesis as “an assumption or concession made for the sake of argument.” In other words, a hypothesis is an educated guess . Scientists make a reasonable assumption--or a hypothesis--then design an experiment to test whether it’s true or not. Keep in mind that in science, a hypothesis should be testable. You have to be able to design an experiment that tests your hypothesis in order for it to be valid. 

As you could assume from that statement, it’s easy to make a bad hypothesis. But when you’re holding an experiment, it’s even more important that your guesses be good...after all, you’re spending time (and maybe money!) to figure out more about your observation. That’s why we refer to a hypothesis as an educated guess--good hypotheses are based on existing data and research to make them as sound as possible.

Hypotheses are one part of what’s called the scientific method .  Every (good) experiment or study is based in the scientific method. The scientific method gives order and structure to experiments and ensures that interference from scientists or outside influences does not skew the results. It’s important that you understand the concepts of the scientific method before holding your own experiment. Though it may vary among scientists, the scientific method is generally made up of six steps (in order):

• Observation
• Asking questions
• Forming a hypothesis
• Analyze the data
• Communicate your results

You’ll notice that the hypothesis comes pretty early on when conducting an experiment. That’s because experiments work best when they’re trying to answer one specific question. And you can’t conduct an experiment until you know what you’re trying to prove!

Independent and Dependent Variables 

After doing your research, you’re ready for another important step in forming your hypothesis: identifying variables. Variables are basically any factor that could influence the outcome of your experiment . Variables have to be measurable and related to the topic being studied.

There are two types of variables:  independent variables and dependent variables. I ndependent variables remain constant . For example, age is an independent variable; it will stay the same, and researchers can look at different ages to see if it has an effect on the dependent variable. 

Speaking of dependent variables... dependent variables are subject to the influence of the independent variable , meaning that they are not constant. Let’s say you want to test whether a person’s age affects how much sleep they need. In that case, the independent variable is age (like we mentioned above), and the dependent variable is how much sleep a person gets. 

Variables will be crucial in writing your hypothesis. You need to be able to identify which variable is which, as both the independent and dependent variables will be written into your hypothesis. For instance, in a study about exercise, the independent variable might be the speed at which the respondents walk for thirty minutes, and the dependent variable would be their heart rate. In your study and in your hypothesis, you’re trying to understand the relationship between the two variables.

Elements of a Good Hypothesis

The best hypotheses start by asking the right questions . For instance, if you’ve observed that the grass is greener when it rains twice a week, you could ask what kind of grass it is, what elevation it’s at, and if the grass across the street responds to rain in the same way. Any of these questions could become the backbone of experiments to test why the grass gets greener when it rains fairly frequently.

As you’re asking more questions about your first observation, make sure you’re also making more observations . If it doesn’t rain for two weeks and the grass still looks green, that’s an important observation that could influence your hypothesis. You'll continue observing all throughout your experiment, but until the hypothesis is finalized, every observation should be noted.

Finally, you should consult secondary research before writing your hypothesis . Secondary research is comprised of results found and published by other people. You can usually find this information online or at your library. Additionally, m ake sure the research you find is credible and related to your topic. If you’re studying the correlation between rain and grass growth, it would help you to research rain patterns over the past twenty years for your county, published by a local agricultural association. You should also research the types of grass common in your area, the type of grass in your lawn, and whether anyone else has conducted experiments about your hypothesis. Also be sure you’re checking the quality of your research . Research done by a middle school student about what minerals can be found in rainwater would be less useful than an article published by a local university.

Writing Your Hypothesis

Once you’ve considered all of the factors above, you’re ready to start writing your hypothesis. Hypotheses usually take a certain form when they’re written out in a research report.

When you boil down your hypothesis statement, you are writing down your best guess and not the question at hand . This means that your statement should be written as if it is fact already, even though you are simply testing it.

The reason for this is that, after you have completed your study, you'll either accept or reject your if-then or your null hypothesis. All hypothesis testing examples should be measurable and able to be confirmed or denied. You cannot confirm a question, only a statement! 

In fact, you come up with hypothesis examples all the time! For instance, when you guess on the outcome of a basketball game, you don’t say, “Will the Miami Heat beat the Boston Celtics?” but instead, “I think the Miami Heat will beat the Boston Celtics.” You state it as if it is already true, even if it turns out you’re wrong. You do the same thing when writing your hypothesis.

Additionally, keep in mind that hypotheses can range from very specific to very broad.  These hypotheses can be specific, but if your hypothesis testing examples involve a broad range of causes and effects, your hypothesis can also be broad.  

The Two Types of Hypotheses

Now that you understand what goes into a hypothesis, it’s time to look more closely at the two most common types of hypothesis: the if-then hypothesis and the null hypothesis.

#1: If-Then Hypotheses

First of all, if-then hypotheses typically follow this formula:

If ____ happens, then ____ will happen.

The goal of this type of hypothesis is to test the causal relationship between the independent and dependent variable. It’s fairly simple, and each hypothesis can vary in how detailed it can be. We create if-then hypotheses all the time with our daily predictions. Here are some examples of hypotheses that use an if-then structure from daily life: 

• If I get enough sleep, I’ll be able to get more work done tomorrow.
• If the bus is on time, I can make it to my friend’s birthday party. 
• If I study every night this week, I’ll get a better grade on my exam. 

In each of these situations, you’re making a guess on how an independent variable (sleep, time, or studying) will affect a dependent variable (the amount of work you can do, making it to a party on time, or getting better grades). 

You may still be asking, “What is an example of a hypothesis used in scientific research?” Take one of the hypothesis examples from a real-world study on whether using technology before bed affects children’s sleep patterns. The hypothesis read s:

“We hypothesized that increased hours of tablet- and phone-based screen time at bedtime would be inversely correlated with sleep quality and child attention.”

It might not look like it, but this is an if-then statement. The researchers basically said, “If children have more screen usage at bedtime, then their quality of sleep and attention will be worse.” The sleep quality and attention are the dependent variables and the screen usage is the independent variable. (Usually, the independent variable comes after the “if” and the dependent variable comes after the “then,” as it is the independent variable that affects the dependent variable.) This is an excellent example of how flexible hypothesis statements can be, as long as the general idea of “if-then” and the independent and dependent variables are present.

#2: Null Hypotheses

Your if-then hypothesis is not the only one needed to complete a successful experiment, however. You also need a null hypothesis to test it against. In its most basic form, the null hypothesis is the opposite of your if-then hypothesis . When you write your null hypothesis, you are writing a hypothesis that suggests that your guess is not true, and that the independent and dependent variables have no relationship .

One null hypothesis for the cell phone and sleep study from the last section might say: 

“If children have more screen usage at bedtime, their quality of sleep and attention will not be worse.” 

In this case, this is a null hypothesis because it’s asking the opposite of the original thesis! 

Conversely, if your if-then hypothesis suggests that your two variables have no relationship, then your null hypothesis would suggest that there is one. So, pretend that there is a study that is asking the question, “Does the amount of followers on Instagram influence how long people spend on the app?” The independent variable is the amount of followers, and the dependent variable is the time spent. But if you, as the researcher, don’t think there is a relationship between the number of followers and time spent, you might write an if-then hypothesis that reads:

“If people have many followers on Instagram, they will not spend more time on the app than people who have less.”

In this case, the if-then suggests there isn’t a relationship between the variables. In that case, one of the null hypothesis examples might say:

“If people have many followers on Instagram, they will spend more time on the app than people who have less.”

You then test both the if-then and the null hypothesis to gauge if there is a relationship between the variables, and if so, how much of a relationship. 

4 Tips to Write the Best Hypothesis

If you’re going to take the time to hold an experiment, whether in school or by yourself, you’re also going to want to take the time to make sure your hypothesis is a good one. The best hypotheses have four major elements in common: plausibility, defined concepts, observability, and general explanation.

#1: Plausibility

At first glance, this quality of a hypothesis might seem obvious. When your hypothesis is plausible, that means it’s possible given what we know about science and general common sense. However, improbable hypotheses are more common than you might think. 

Imagine you’re studying weight gain and television watching habits. If you hypothesize that people who watch more than  twenty hours of television a week will gain two hundred pounds or more over the course of a year, this might be improbable (though it’s potentially possible). Consequently, c ommon sense can tell us the results of the study before the study even begins.

Improbable hypotheses generally go against  science, as well. Take this hypothesis example: 

“If a person smokes one cigarette a day, then they will have lungs just as healthy as the average person’s.” 

This hypothesis is obviously untrue, as studies have shown again and again that cigarettes negatively affect lung health. You must be careful that your hypotheses do not reflect your own personal opinion more than they do scientifically-supported findings. This plausibility points to the necessity of research before the hypothesis is written to make sure that your hypothesis has not already been disproven.

#2: Defined Concepts

The more advanced you are in your studies, the more likely that the terms you’re using in your hypothesis are specific to a limited set of knowledge. One of the hypothesis testing examples might include the readability of printed text in newspapers, where you might use words like “kerning” and “x-height.” Unless your readers have a background in graphic design, it’s likely that they won’t know what you mean by these terms. Thus, it’s important to either write what they mean in the hypothesis itself or in the report before the hypothesis.

Here’s what we mean. Which of the following sentences makes more sense to the common person?

If the kerning is greater than average, more words will be read per minute.

If the space between letters is greater than average, more words will be read per minute.

For people reading your report that are not experts in typography, simply adding a few more words will be helpful in clarifying exactly what the experiment is all about. It’s always a good idea to make your research and findings as accessible as possible. 

Good hypotheses ensure that you can observe the results. 

#3: Observability

In order to measure the truth or falsity of your hypothesis, you must be able to see your variables and the way they interact. For instance, if your hypothesis is that the flight patterns of satellites affect the strength of certain television signals, yet you don’t have a telescope to view the satellites or a television to monitor the signal strength, you cannot properly observe your hypothesis and thus cannot continue your study.

Some variables may seem easy to observe, but if you do not have a system of measurement in place, you cannot observe your hypothesis properly. Here’s an example: if you’re experimenting on the effect of healthy food on overall happiness, but you don’t have a way to monitor and measure what “overall happiness” means, your results will not reflect the truth. Monitoring how often someone smiles for a whole day is not reasonably observable, but having the participants state how happy they feel on a scale of one to ten is more observable. 

In writing your hypothesis, always keep in mind how you'll execute the experiment.

#4: Generalizability 

Perhaps you’d like to study what color your best friend wears the most often by observing and documenting the colors she wears each day of the week. This might be fun information for her and you to know, but beyond you two, there aren’t many people who could benefit from this experiment. When you start an experiment, you should note how generalizable your findings may be if they are confirmed. Generalizability is basically how common a particular phenomenon is to other people’s everyday life.

Let’s say you’re asking a question about the health benefits of eating an apple for one day only, you need to realize that the experiment may be too specific to be helpful. It does not help to explain a phenomenon that many people experience. If you find yourself with too specific of a hypothesis, go back to asking the big question: what is it that you want to know, and what do you think will happen between your two variables?

Hypothesis Testing Examples

We know it can be hard to write a good hypothesis unless you’ve seen some good hypothesis examples. We’ve included four hypothesis examples based on some made-up experiments. Use these as templates or launch pads for coming up with your own hypotheses.

Experiment #1: Students Studying Outside (Writing a Hypothesis)

You are a student at PrepScholar University. When you walk around campus, you notice that, when the temperature is above 60 degrees, more students study in the quad. You want to know when your fellow students are more likely to study outside. With this information, how do you make the best hypothesis possible?

You must remember to make additional observations and do secondary research before writing your hypothesis. In doing so, you notice that no one studies outside when it’s 75 degrees and raining, so this should be included in your experiment. Also, studies done on the topic beforehand suggested that students are more likely to study in temperatures less than 85 degrees. With this in mind, you feel confident that you can identify your variables and write your hypotheses:

If-then: “If the temperature in Fahrenheit is less than 60 degrees, significantly fewer students will study outside.”

Null: “If the temperature in Fahrenheit is less than 60 degrees, the same number of students will study outside as when it is more than 60 degrees.”

These hypotheses are plausible, as the temperatures are reasonably within the bounds of what is possible. The number of people in the quad is also easily observable. It is also not a phenomenon specific to only one person or at one time, but instead can explain a phenomenon for a broader group of people.

To complete this experiment, you pick the month of October to observe the quad. Every day (except on the days where it’s raining)from 3 to 4 PM, when most classes have released for the day, you observe how many people are on the quad. You measure how many people come  and how many leave. You also write down the temperature on the hour. 

After writing down all of your observations and putting them on a graph, you find that the most students study on the quad when it is 70 degrees outside, and that the number of students drops a lot once the temperature reaches 60 degrees or below. In this case, your research report would state that you accept or “failed to reject” your first hypothesis with your findings.

Experiment #2: The Cupcake Store (Forming a Simple Experiment)

Let’s say that you work at a bakery. You specialize in cupcakes, and you make only two colors of frosting: yellow and purple. You want to know what kind of customers are more likely to buy what kind of cupcake, so you set up an experiment. Your independent variable is the customer’s gender, and the dependent variable is the color of the frosting. What is an example of a hypothesis that might answer the question of this study?

Here’s what your hypotheses might look like: 

If-then: “If customers’ gender is female, then they will buy more yellow cupcakes than purple cupcakes.”

Null: “If customers’ gender is female, then they will be just as likely to buy purple cupcakes as yellow cupcakes.”

This is a pretty simple experiment! It passes the test of plausibility (there could easily be a difference), defined concepts (there’s nothing complicated about cupcakes!), observability (both color and gender can be easily observed), and general explanation ( this would potentially help you make better business decisions ).

Experiment #3: Backyard Bird Feeders (Integrating Multiple Variables and Rejecting the If-Then Hypothesis)

While watching your backyard bird feeder, you realized that different birds come on the days when you change the types of seeds. You decide that you want to see more cardinals in your backyard, so you decide to see what type of food they like the best and set up an experiment. 

However, one morning, you notice that, while some cardinals are present, blue jays are eating out of your backyard feeder filled with millet. You decide that, of all of the other birds, you would like to see the blue jays the least. This means you'll have more than one variable in your hypothesis. Your new hypotheses might look like this: 

If-then: “If sunflower seeds are placed in the bird feeders, then more cardinals will come than blue jays. If millet is placed in the bird feeders, then more blue jays will come than cardinals.”

Null: “If either sunflower seeds or millet are placed in the bird, equal numbers of cardinals and blue jays will come.”

Through simple observation, you actually find that cardinals come as often as blue jays when sunflower seeds or millet is in the bird feeder. In this case, you would reject your “if-then” hypothesis and “fail to reject” your null hypothesis . You cannot accept your first hypothesis, because it’s clearly not true. Instead you found that there was actually no relation between your different variables. Consequently, you would need to run more experiments with different variables to see if the new variables impact the results.

Experiment #4: In-Class Survey (Including an Alternative Hypothesis)

You’re about to give a speech in one of your classes about the importance of paying attention. You want to take this opportunity to test a hypothesis you’ve had for a while: 

If-then: If students sit in the first two rows of the classroom, then they will listen better than students who do not.

Null: If students sit in the first two rows of the classroom, then they will not listen better or worse than students who do not.

You give your speech and then ask your teacher if you can hand out a short survey to the class. On the survey, you’ve included questions about some of the topics you talked about. When you get back the results, you’re surprised to see that not only do the students in the first two rows not pay better attention, but they also scored worse than students in other parts of the classroom! Here, both your if-then and your null hypotheses are not representative of your findings. What do you do?

This is when you reject both your if-then and null hypotheses and instead create an alternative hypothesis . This type of hypothesis is used in the rare circumstance that neither of your hypotheses is able to capture your findings . Now you can use what you’ve learned to draft new hypotheses and test again! 

Key Takeaways: Hypothesis Writing

The more comfortable you become with writing hypotheses, the better they will become. The structure of hypotheses is flexible and may need to be changed depending on what topic you are studying. The most important thing to remember is the purpose of your hypothesis and the difference between the if-then and the null . From there, in forming your hypothesis, you should constantly be asking questions, making observations, doing secondary research, and considering your variables. After you have written your hypothesis, be sure to edit it so that it is plausible, clearly defined, observable, and helpful in explaining a general phenomenon.

Writing a hypothesis is something that everyone, from elementary school children competing in a science fair to professional scientists in a lab, needs to know how to do. Hypotheses are vital in experiments and in properly executing the scientific method . When done correctly, hypotheses will set up your studies for success and help you to understand the world a little better, one experiment at a time.

What’s Next?

If you’re studying for the science portion of the ACT, there’s definitely a lot you need to know. We’ve got the tools to help, though! Start by checking out our ultimate study guide for the ACT Science subject test. Once you read through that, be sure to download our recommended ACT Science practice tests , since they’re one of the most foolproof ways to improve your score. (And don’t forget to check out our expert guide book , too.)

If you love science and want to major in a scientific field, you should start preparing in high school . Here are the science classes you should take to set yourself up for success.

If you’re trying to think of science experiments you can do for class (or for a science fair!), here’s a list of 37 awesome science experiments you can do at home

Trending Now

How to Get Into Harvard and the Ivy League

How to Get a Perfect 4.0 GPA

How to Write an Amazing College Essay

What Exactly Are Colleges Looking For?

ACT vs. SAT: Which Test Should You Take?

When should you take the SAT or ACT?

Get Your Free

Find Your Target SAT Score

Free Complete Official SAT Practice Tests

How to Get a Perfect SAT Score, by an Expert Full Scorer

Score 800 on SAT Math

Score 800 on SAT Reading and Writing

How to Improve Your Low SAT Score

Score 600 on SAT Math

Score 600 on SAT Reading and Writing

Find Your Target ACT Score

Complete Official Free ACT Practice Tests

How to Get a Perfect ACT Score, by a 36 Full Scorer

Get a 36 on ACT English

Get a 36 on ACT Math

Get a 36 on ACT Reading

Get a 36 on ACT Science

How to Improve Your Low ACT Score

Get a 24 on ACT English

Get a 24 on ACT Math

Get a 24 on ACT Reading

Get a 24 on ACT Science

Stay Informed

Get the latest articles and test prep tips!

Ashley Sufflé Robinson has a Ph.D. in 19th Century English Literature. As a content writer for PrepScholar, Ashley is passionate about giving college-bound students the in-depth information they need to get into the school of their dreams.

Ask a Question Below

Have any questions about this article or other topics? Ask below and we'll reply!

• Bipolar Disorder
• Therapy Center
• When To See a Therapist
• Types of Therapy
• Best Online Therapy
• Best Couples Therapy
• Best Family Therapy
• Managing Stress
• Sleep and Dreaming
• Understanding Emotions
• Self-Improvement
• Healthy Relationships
• Student Resources
• Personality Types
• Sweepstakes
• Guided Meditations
• Verywell Mind Insights
• 2024 Verywell Mind 25
• Mental Health in the Classroom
• Editorial Process
• Meet Our Review Board
• Crisis Support

How to Write a Great Hypothesis

Hypothesis Definition, Format, Examples, and Tips

Verywell / Alex Dos Diaz

• The Scientific Method

Hypothesis Format

Falsifiability of a hypothesis.

• Operationalization

Hypothesis Types

Hypotheses examples.

• Collecting Data

A hypothesis is a tentative statement about the relationship between two or more variables. It is a specific, testable prediction about what you expect to happen in a study. It is a preliminary answer to your question that helps guide the research process.

Consider a study designed to examine the relationship between sleep deprivation and test performance. The hypothesis might be: "This study is designed to assess the hypothesis that sleep-deprived people will perform worse on a test than individuals who are not sleep-deprived."

At a Glance

A hypothesis is crucial to scientific research because it offers a clear direction for what the researchers are looking to find. This allows them to design experiments to test their predictions and add to our scientific knowledge about the world. This article explores how a hypothesis is used in psychology research, how to write a good hypothesis, and the different types of hypotheses you might use.

The Hypothesis in the Scientific Method

In the scientific method , whether it involves research in psychology, biology, or some other area, a hypothesis represents what the researchers think will happen in an experiment. The scientific method involves the following steps:

• Forming a question
• Performing background research
• Creating a hypothesis
• Designing an experiment
• Collecting data
• Analyzing the results
• Drawing conclusions
• Communicating the results

The hypothesis is a prediction, but it involves more than a guess. Most of the time, the hypothesis begins with a question which is then explored through background research. At this point, researchers then begin to develop a testable hypothesis.

Unless you are creating an exploratory study, your hypothesis should always explain what you  expect  to happen.

In a study exploring the effects of a particular drug, the hypothesis might be that researchers expect the drug to have some type of effect on the symptoms of a specific illness. In psychology, the hypothesis might focus on how a certain aspect of the environment might influence a particular behavior.

Remember, a hypothesis does not have to be correct. While the hypothesis predicts what the researchers expect to see, the goal of the research is to determine whether this guess is right or wrong. When conducting an experiment, researchers might explore numerous factors to determine which ones might contribute to the ultimate outcome.

In many cases, researchers may find that the results of an experiment  do not  support the original hypothesis. When writing up these results, the researchers might suggest other options that should be explored in future studies.

In many cases, researchers might draw a hypothesis from a specific theory or build on previous research. For example, prior research has shown that stress can impact the immune system. So a researcher might hypothesize: "People with high-stress levels will be more likely to contract a common cold after being exposed to the virus than people who have low-stress levels."

In other instances, researchers might look at commonly held beliefs or folk wisdom. "Birds of a feather flock together" is one example of folk adage that a psychologist might try to investigate. The researcher might pose a specific hypothesis that "People tend to select romantic partners who are similar to them in interests and educational level."

Elements of a Good Hypothesis

So how do you write a good hypothesis? When trying to come up with a hypothesis for your research or experiments, ask yourself the following questions:

• Is your hypothesis based on your research on a topic?
• Can your hypothesis be tested?
• Does your hypothesis include independent and dependent variables?

Before you come up with a specific hypothesis, spend some time doing background research. Once you have completed a literature review, start thinking about potential questions you still have. Pay attention to the discussion section in the  journal articles you read . Many authors will suggest questions that still need to be explored.

How to Formulate a Good Hypothesis

To form a hypothesis, you should take these steps:

• Collect as many observations about a topic or problem as you can.
• Evaluate these observations and look for possible causes of the problem.
• Create a list of possible explanations that you might want to explore.
• After you have developed some possible hypotheses, think of ways that you could confirm or disprove each hypothesis through experimentation. This is known as falsifiability.

In the scientific method ,  falsifiability is an important part of any valid hypothesis. In order to test a claim scientifically, it must be possible that the claim could be proven false.

Students sometimes confuse the idea of falsifiability with the idea that it means that something is false, which is not the case. What falsifiability means is that  if  something was false, then it is possible to demonstrate that it is false.

One of the hallmarks of pseudoscience is that it makes claims that cannot be refuted or proven false.

The Importance of Operational Definitions

A variable is a factor or element that can be changed and manipulated in ways that are observable and measurable. However, the researcher must also define how the variable will be manipulated and measured in the study.

Operational definitions are specific definitions for all relevant factors in a study. This process helps make vague or ambiguous concepts detailed and measurable.

For example, a researcher might operationally define the variable " test anxiety " as the results of a self-report measure of anxiety experienced during an exam. A "study habits" variable might be defined by the amount of studying that actually occurs as measured by time.

These precise descriptions are important because many things can be measured in various ways. Clearly defining these variables and how they are measured helps ensure that other researchers can replicate your results.

Replicability

One of the basic principles of any type of scientific research is that the results must be replicable.

Replication means repeating an experiment in the same way to produce the same results. By clearly detailing the specifics of how the variables were measured and manipulated, other researchers can better understand the results and repeat the study if needed.

Some variables are more difficult than others to define. For example, how would you operationally define a variable such as aggression ? For obvious ethical reasons, researchers cannot create a situation in which a person behaves aggressively toward others.

To measure this variable, the researcher must devise a measurement that assesses aggressive behavior without harming others. The researcher might utilize a simulated task to measure aggressiveness in this situation.

Hypothesis Checklist

• Does your hypothesis focus on something that you can actually test?
• Does your hypothesis include both an independent and dependent variable?
• Can you manipulate the variables?
• Can your hypothesis be tested without violating ethical standards?

The hypothesis you use will depend on what you are investigating and hoping to find. Some of the main types of hypotheses that you might use include:

• Simple hypothesis : This type of hypothesis suggests there is a relationship between one independent variable and one dependent variable.
• Complex hypothesis : This type suggests a relationship between three or more variables, such as two independent and dependent variables.
• Null hypothesis : This hypothesis suggests no relationship exists between two or more variables.
• Alternative hypothesis : This hypothesis states the opposite of the null hypothesis.
• Statistical hypothesis : This hypothesis uses statistical analysis to evaluate a representative population sample and then generalizes the findings to the larger group.
• Logical hypothesis : This hypothesis assumes a relationship between variables without collecting data or evidence.

A hypothesis often follows a basic format of "If {this happens} then {this will happen}." One way to structure your hypothesis is to describe what will happen to the  dependent variable  if you change the  independent variable .

The basic format might be: "If {these changes are made to a certain independent variable}, then we will observe {a change in a specific dependent variable}."

A few examples of simple hypotheses:

• "Students who eat breakfast will perform better on a math exam than students who do not eat breakfast."
• "Students who experience test anxiety before an English exam will get lower scores than students who do not experience test anxiety."​
• "Motorists who talk on the phone while driving will be more likely to make errors on a driving course than those who do not talk on the phone."
• "Children who receive a new reading intervention will have higher reading scores than students who do not receive the intervention."

Examples of a complex hypothesis include:

• "People with high-sugar diets and sedentary activity levels are more likely to develop depression."
• "Younger people who are regularly exposed to green, outdoor areas have better subjective well-being than older adults who have limited exposure to green spaces."

Examples of a null hypothesis include:

• "There is no difference in anxiety levels between people who take St. John's wort supplements and those who do not."
• "There is no difference in scores on a memory recall task between children and adults."
• "There is no difference in aggression levels between children who play first-person shooter games and those who do not."

Examples of an alternative hypothesis:

• "People who take St. John's wort supplements will have less anxiety than those who do not."
• "Adults will perform better on a memory task than children."
• "Children who play first-person shooter games will show higher levels of aggression than children who do not." 

Collecting Data on Your Hypothesis

Once a researcher has formed a testable hypothesis, the next step is to select a research design and start collecting data. The research method depends largely on exactly what they are studying. There are two basic types of research methods: descriptive research and experimental research.

Descriptive Research Methods

Descriptive research such as  case studies ,  naturalistic observations , and surveys are often used when  conducting an experiment is difficult or impossible. These methods are best used to describe different aspects of a behavior or psychological phenomenon.

Once a researcher has collected data using descriptive methods, a  correlational study  can examine how the variables are related. This research method might be used to investigate a hypothesis that is difficult to test experimentally.

Examples of Independent and Dependent Variables

What Are Independent and Dependent Variables?

• Chemical Laws
• Periodic Table
• Projects & Experiments
• Scientific Method
• Biochemistry
• Physical Chemistry
• Medical Chemistry
• Chemistry In Everyday Life
• Famous Chemists
• Activities for Kids
• Abbreviations & Acronyms
• Weather & Climate
• Ph.D., Biomedical Sciences, University of Tennessee at Knoxville
• B.A., Physics and Mathematics, Hastings College

Both the independent variable and dependent variable are examined in an experiment using the scientific method , so it's important to know what they are and how to use them.

In a scientific experiment, you'll ultimately be changing or controlling the independent variable and measuring the effect on the dependent variable. This distinction is critical in evaluating and proving hypotheses.

Below you'll find more about these two types of variables, along with examples of each in sample science experiments, and an explanation of how to graph them to help visualize your data.

What Is an Independent Variable?

An independent variable is the condition that you change in an experiment. In other words, it is the variable you control. It is called independent because its value does not depend on and is not affected by the state of any other variable in the experiment. Sometimes you may hear this variable called the "controlled variable" because it is the one that is changed. Do not confuse it with a control variable , which is a variable that is purposely held constant so that it can't affect the outcome of the experiment.

• What Is a Dependent Variable?

The dependent variable is the condition that you measure in an experiment. You are assessing how it responds to a change in the independent variable, so you can think of it as depending on the independent variable. Sometimes the dependent variable is called the "responding variable."

Independent and Dependent Variable Examples

• In a study to determine whether the amount of time a student sleeps affects test scores, the independent variable is the amount of time spent sleeping while the dependent variable is the test score.
• You want to compare brands of paper towels to see which holds the most liquid. The independent variable in your experiment would be the brand of paper towels. The dependent variable would be the amount of liquid absorbed by the paper towel.
• In an experiment to determine how far people can see into the infrared part of the spectrum, the wavelength of light is the independent variable and whether the light is observed (the response) is the dependent variable.
• If you want to know whether caffeine affects your appetite, the presence or absence of a given amount of caffeine would be the independent variable. How hungry you are would be the dependent variable.
• You want to determine whether a chemical is essential for rat nutrition, so you design an experiment. The presence or absence of the chemical is the independent variable. The health of the rat (whether it lives and can reproduce) is the dependent variable. If you determine the substance is necessary for proper nutrition, a follow-up experiment might determine how much of the chemical is needed. Here, the amount of the chemical would be the independent variable, and the rat's health would be the dependent variable.

How Do You Tell Independent and Dependent Variables Apart?

If you are having a hard time identifying which variable is the independent variable and which is the dependent variable, remember the dependent variable is the one affected by a change in the independent variable. If you write out the variables in a sentence that shows cause and effect, the independent variable causes the effect on the dependent variable. If you have the variables in the wrong order, the sentence won't make sense.

Independent variable causes an effect on the dependent variable.

Example : How long you sleep (independent variable) affects your test score (dependent variable).

This makes sense, but:

Example : Your test score affects how long you sleep.

This doesn't really make sense (unless you can't sleep because you are worried you failed a test, but that would be a different experiment).

How to Plot Variables on a Graph

There is a standard method for graphing independent and dependent variables. The x-axis is the independent variable, while the y-axis is the dependent variable. You can use the DRY MIX acronym to help remember how to graph variables:

D  = dependent variable R  = responding variable Y  = graph on the vertical or y-axis

M  = manipulated variable I  = independent variable X  = graph on the horizontal or x-axis

Test your understanding with the scientific method quiz .

Key Takeaways

• In scientific experiments, the independent variable is manipulated while the dependent variable is measured.
• The independent variable, controlled by the experimenter, influences the dependent variable, which responds to changes. This dynamic forms the basis of cause-and-effect relationships.
• Graphing independent and dependent variables follows a standard method in which the independent variable is plotted on the x-axis and the dependent variable on the y-axis.
• Difference Between Independent and Dependent Variables
• The Difference Between Control Group and Experimental Group
• How to Write a Lab Report
• What Is an Experiment? Definition and Design
• How To Design a Science Fair Experiment
• Boiling Points of Ethanol, Methanol, and Isopropyl Alcohol
• 10 Examples of Heterogeneous and Homogeneous Mixtures
• The Difference Between Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Mixtures
• The Difference Between Intensive and Extensive Properties
• Understanding Experimental Groups
• Chemical Properties of Matter
• Examples of Physical Changes
• Commensalism Definition, Examples, and Relationships
• Acidic Solution Definition
• Understanding Endothermic and Exothermic Reactions

• Science Notes Posts
• Contact Science Notes
• Todd Helmenstine Biography
• Anne Helmenstine Biography
• Free Printable Periodic Tables (PDF and PNG)
• Periodic Table Wallpapers
• Interactive Periodic Table
• Periodic Table Posters
• Science Experiments for Kids
• How to Grow Crystals
• Chemistry Projects
• Fire and Flames Projects
• Holiday Science
• Chemistry Problems With Answers
• Physics Problems
• Unit Conversion Example Problems
• Chemistry Worksheets
• Biology Worksheets
• Periodic Table Worksheets
• Physical Science Worksheets
• Science Lab Worksheets
• My Amazon Books

Independent and Dependent Variables Examples

The independent and dependent variables are key to any scientific experiment, but how do you tell them apart? Here are the definitions of independent and dependent variables, examples of each type, and tips for telling them apart and graphing them.

Independent Variable

The independent variable is the factor the researcher changes or controls in an experiment. It is called independent because it does not depend on any other variable. The independent variable may be called the “controlled variable” because it is the one that is changed or controlled. This is different from the “ control variable ,” which is variable that is held constant so it won’t influence the outcome of the experiment.

Dependent Variable

The dependent variable is the factor that changes in response to the independent variable. It is the variable that you measure in an experiment. The dependent variable may be called the “responding variable.”

Examples of Independent and Dependent Variables

Here are several examples of independent and dependent variables in experiments:

• In a study to determine whether how long a student sleeps affects test scores, the independent variable is the length of time spent sleeping while the dependent variable is the test score.
• You want to know which brand of fertilizer is best for your plants. The brand of fertilizer is the independent variable. The health of the plants (height, amount and size of flowers and fruit, color) is the dependent variable.
• You want to compare brands of paper towels, to see which holds the most liquid. The independent variable is the brand of paper towel. The dependent variable is the volume of liquid absorbed by the paper towel.
• You suspect the amount of television a person watches is related to their age. Age is the independent variable. How many minutes or hours of television a person watches is the dependent variable.
• You think rising sea temperatures might affect the amount of algae in the water. The water temperature is the independent variable. The mass of algae is the dependent variable.
• In an experiment to determine how far people can see into the infrared part of the spectrum, the wavelength of light is the independent variable and whether the light is observed is the dependent variable.
• If you want to know whether caffeine affects your appetite, the presence/absence or amount of caffeine is the independent variable. Appetite is the dependent variable.
• You want to know which brand of microwave popcorn pops the best. The brand of popcorn is the independent variable. The number of popped kernels is the dependent variable. Of course, you could also measure the number of unpopped kernels instead.
• You want to determine whether a chemical is essential for rat nutrition, so you design an experiment. The presence/absence of the chemical is the independent variable. The health of the rat (whether it lives and reproduces) is the dependent variable. A follow-up experiment might determine how much of the chemical is needed. Here, the amount of chemical is the independent variable and the rat health is the dependent variable.

How to Tell the Independent and Dependent Variable Apart

If you’re having trouble identifying the independent and dependent variable, here are a few ways to tell them apart. First, remember the dependent variable depends on the independent variable. It helps to write out the variables as an if-then or cause-and-effect sentence that shows the independent variable causes an effect on the dependent variable. If you mix up the variables, the sentence won’t make sense. Example : The amount of eat (independent variable) affects how much you weigh (dependent variable).

This makes sense, but if you write the sentence the other way, you can tell it’s incorrect: Example : How much you weigh affects how much you eat. (Well, it could make sense, but you can see it’s an entirely different experiment.) If-then statements also work: Example : If you change the color of light (independent variable), then it affects plant growth (dependent variable). Switching the variables makes no sense: Example : If plant growth rate changes, then it affects the color of light. Sometimes you don’t control either variable, like when you gather data to see if there is a relationship between two factors. This can make identifying the variables a bit trickier, but establishing a logical cause and effect relationship helps: Example : If you increase age (independent variable), then average salary increases (dependent variable). If you switch them, the statement doesn’t make sense: Example : If you increase salary, then age increases.

How to Graph Independent and Dependent Variables

Plot or graph independent and dependent variables using the standard method. The independent variable is the x-axis, while the dependent variable is the y-axis. Remember the acronym DRY MIX to keep the variables straight: D = Dependent variable R = Responding variable/ Y = Graph on the y-axis or vertical axis M = Manipulated variable I = Independent variable X = Graph on the x-axis or horizontal axis

• Babbie, Earl R. (2009). The Practice of Social Research (12th ed.) Wadsworth Publishing. ISBN 0-495-59841-0.
• di Francia, G. Toraldo (1981). The Investigation of the Physical World . Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-29925-1.
• Gauch, Hugh G. Jr. (2003). Scientific Method in Practice . Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-01708-4.
• Popper, Karl R. (2003). Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge . Routledge. ISBN 0-415-28594-1.

Related Posts

Independent and Dependent Variables

Saul McLeod, PhD

Editor-in-Chief for Simply Psychology

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MRes, PhD, University of Manchester

Saul McLeod, PhD., is a qualified psychology teacher with over 18 years of experience in further and higher education. He has been published in peer-reviewed journals, including the Journal of Clinical Psychology.

Learn about our Editorial Process

Olivia Guy-Evans, MSc

Associate Editor for Simply Psychology

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MSc Psychology of Education

Olivia Guy-Evans is a writer and associate editor for Simply Psychology. She has previously worked in healthcare and educational sectors.

On This Page:

In research, a variable is any characteristic, number, or quantity that can be measured or counted in experimental investigations . One is called the dependent variable, and the other is the independent variable.

In research, the independent variable is manipulated to observe its effect, while the dependent variable is the measured outcome. Essentially, the independent variable is the presumed cause, and the dependent variable is the observed effect.

Variables provide the foundation for examining relationships, drawing conclusions, and making predictions in research studies.

Independent Variable

In psychology, the independent variable is the variable the experimenter manipulates or changes and is assumed to directly affect the dependent variable.

It’s considered the cause or factor that drives change, allowing psychologists to observe how it influences behavior, emotions, or other dependent variables in an experimental setting. Essentially, it’s the presumed cause in cause-and-effect relationships being studied.

For example, allocating participants to drug or placebo conditions (independent variable) to measure any changes in the intensity of their anxiety (dependent variable).

In a well-designed experimental study , the independent variable is the only important difference between the experimental (e.g., treatment) and control (e.g., placebo) groups.

By changing the independent variable and holding other factors constant, psychologists aim to determine if it causes a change in another variable, called the dependent variable.

For example, in a study investigating the effects of sleep on memory, the amount of sleep (e.g., 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours) would be the independent variable, as the researcher might manipulate or categorize it to see its impact on memory recall, which would be the dependent variable.

Dependent Variable

In psychology, the dependent variable is the variable being tested and measured in an experiment and is “dependent” on the independent variable.

In psychology, a dependent variable represents the outcome or results and can change based on the manipulations of the independent variable. Essentially, it’s the presumed effect in a cause-and-effect relationship being studied.

An example of a dependent variable is depression symptoms, which depend on the independent variable (type of therapy).

In an experiment, the researcher looks for the possible effect on the dependent variable that might be caused by changing the independent variable.

For instance, in a study examining the effects of a new study technique on exam performance, the technique would be the independent variable (as it is being introduced or manipulated), while the exam scores would be the dependent variable (as they represent the outcome of interest that’s being measured).

Examples in Research Studies

For example, we might change the type of information (e.g., organized or random) given to participants to see how this might affect the amount of information remembered.

In this example, the type of information is the independent variable (because it changes), and the amount of information remembered is the dependent variable (because this is being measured).

For the following hypotheses, name the IV and the DV.

1. Lack of sleep significantly affects learning in 10-year-old boys.

IV……………………………………………………

DV…………………………………………………..

2. Social class has a significant effect on IQ scores.

DV……………………………………………….…

3. Stressful experiences significantly increase the likelihood of headaches.

4. Time of day has a significant effect on alertness.

Operationalizing Variables

To ensure cause and effect are established, it is important that we identify exactly how the independent and dependent variables will be measured; this is known as operationalizing the variables.

Operational variables (or operationalizing definitions) refer to how you will define and measure a specific variable as it is used in your study. This enables another psychologist to replicate your research and is essential in establishing reliability (achieving consistency in the results).

For example, if we are concerned with the effect of media violence on aggression, then we need to be very clear about what we mean by the different terms. In this case, we must state what we mean by the terms “media violence” and “aggression” as we will study them.

Therefore, you could state that “media violence” is operationally defined (in your experiment) as ‘exposure to a 15-minute film showing scenes of physical assault’; “aggression” is operationally defined as ‘levels of electrical shocks administered to a second ‘participant’ in another room.

In another example, the hypothesis “Young participants will have significantly better memories than older participants” is not operationalized. How do we define “young,” “old,” or “memory”? “Participants aged between 16 – 30 will recall significantly more nouns from a list of twenty than participants aged between 55 – 70” is operationalized.

The key point here is that we have clarified what we mean by the terms as they were studied and measured in our experiment.

If we didn’t do this, it would be very difficult (if not impossible) to compare the findings of different studies to the same behavior.

Operationalization has the advantage of generally providing a clear and objective definition of even complex variables. It also makes it easier for other researchers to replicate a study and check for reliability .

For the following hypotheses, name the IV and the DV and operationalize both variables.

1. Women are more attracted to men without earrings than men with earrings.

I.V._____________________________________________________________

D.V. ____________________________________________________________

Operational definitions:

I.V. ____________________________________________________________

2. People learn more when they study in a quiet versus noisy place.

I.V. _________________________________________________________

D.V. ___________________________________________________________

3. People who exercise regularly sleep better at night.

Can there be more than one independent or dependent variable in a study?

Yes, it is possible to have more than one independent or dependent variable in a study.

In some studies, researchers may want to explore how multiple factors affect the outcome, so they include more than one independent variable.

Similarly, they may measure multiple things to see how they are influenced, resulting in multiple dependent variables. This allows for a more comprehensive understanding of the topic being studied.

What are some ethical considerations related to independent and dependent variables?

Ethical considerations related to independent and dependent variables involve treating participants fairly and protecting their rights.

Researchers must ensure that participants provide informed consent and that their privacy and confidentiality are respected. Additionally, it is important to avoid manipulating independent variables in ways that could cause harm or discomfort to participants.

Researchers should also consider the potential impact of their study on vulnerable populations and ensure that their methods are unbiased and free from discrimination.

Ethical guidelines help ensure that research is conducted responsibly and with respect for the well-being of the participants involved.

Can qualitative data have independent and dependent variables?

Yes, both quantitative and qualitative data can have independent and dependent variables.

In quantitative research, independent variables are usually measured numerically and manipulated to understand their impact on the dependent variable. In qualitative research, independent variables can be qualitative in nature, such as individual experiences, cultural factors, or social contexts, influencing the phenomenon of interest.

The dependent variable, in both cases, is what is being observed or studied to see how it changes in response to the independent variable.

So, regardless of the type of data, researchers analyze the relationship between independent and dependent variables to gain insights into their research questions.

Can the same variable be independent in one study and dependent in another?

Yes, the same variable can be independent in one study and dependent in another.

The classification of a variable as independent or dependent depends on how it is used within a specific study. In one study, a variable might be manipulated or controlled to see its effect on another variable, making it independent.

However, in a different study, that same variable might be the one being measured or observed to understand its relationship with another variable, making it dependent.

The role of a variable as independent or dependent can vary depending on the research question and study design.

Scientific Method: Step 3: HYPOTHESIS

• Step 1: QUESTION
• Step 2: RESEARCH
• Step 3: HYPOTHESIS
• Step 4: EXPERIMENT
• Step 5: DATA
• Step 6: CONCLUSION

Step 3: State your hypothesis

Now it's time to state your hypothesis . The hypothesis is an educated guess as to what will happen during your experiment. 

The hypothesis is often written using the words "IF" and "THEN." For example, " If I do not study, then I will fail the test." The "if' and "then" statements reflect your independent and dependent variables . 

The hypothesis should relate back to your original question and must be testable .

A word about variables...

Your experiment will include variables to measure and to explain any cause and effect. Below you will find some useful links describing the different types of variables.

• "What are independent and dependent variables" NCES
• [VIDEO] Biology: Independent vs. Dependent Variables (Nucleus Medical Media) Video explaining independent and dependent variables, with examples.

Resource Links

• What is and How to Write a Good Hypothesis in Research? (Elsevier)
• Hypothesis brochure from Penn State/Berks

• << Previous: Step 2: RESEARCH
• Next: Step 4: EXPERIMENT >>
• Last Updated: Aug 2, 2024 3:45 PM
• URL: https://harford.libguides.com/scientific_method

• Skip to secondary menu
• Skip to main content
• Skip to primary sidebar

Statistics By Jim

Making statistics intuitive

Independent and Dependent Variables: Differences & Examples

By Jim Frost 15 Comments

In this post, learn the definitions of independent and dependent variables, how to identify each type, how they differ between different types of studies, and see examples of them in use.

What is an Independent Variable?

Independent variables (IVs) are the ones that you include in the model to explain or predict changes in the dependent variable. The name helps you understand their role in statistical analysis. These variables are independent . In this context, independent indicates that they stand alone and other variables in the model do not influence them. The researchers are not seeking to understand what causes the independent variables to change.

Independent variables are also known as predictors, factors , treatment variables, explanatory variables, input variables, x-variables, and right-hand variables—because they appear on the right side of the equals sign in a regression equation. In notation, statisticians commonly denote them using Xs. On graphs, analysts place independent variables on the horizontal, or X, axis.

In machine learning, independent variables are known as features.

For example, in a plant growth study, the independent variables might be soil moisture (continuous) and type of fertilizer (categorical).

Statistical models will estimate effect sizes for the independent variables.

Relate post : Effect Sizes in Statistics

Including independent variables in studies

The nature of independent variables changes based on the type of experiment or study:

Controlled experiments : Researchers systematically control and set the values of the independent variables. In randomized experiments, relationships between independent and dependent variables tend to be causal. The independent variables cause changes in the dependent variable.

Observational studies : Researchers do not set the values of the explanatory variables but instead observe them in their natural environment. When the independent and dependent variables are correlated, those relationships might not be causal.

When you include one independent variable in a regression model, you are performing simple regression. For more than one independent variable, it is multiple regression. Despite the different names, it’s really the same analysis with the same interpretations and assumptions.

Determining which IVs to include in a statistical model is known as model specification. That process involves in-depth research and many subject-area, theoretical, and statistical considerations. At its most basic level, you’ll want to include the predictors you are specifically assessing in your study and confounding variables that will bias your results if you don’t add them—particularly for observational studies.

For more information about choosing independent variables, read my post about Specifying the Correct Regression Model .

Related posts : Randomized Experiments , Observational Studies , Covariates , and Confounding Variables

What is a Dependent Variable?

The dependent variable (DV) is what you want to use the model to explain or predict. The values of this variable depend on other variables. It is the outcome that you’re studying. It’s also known as the response variable, outcome variable, and left-hand variable. Statisticians commonly denote them using a Y. Traditionally, graphs place dependent variables on the vertical, or Y, axis.

For example, in the plant growth study example, a measure of plant growth is the dependent variable. That is the outcome of the experiment, and we want to determine what affects it.

How to Identify Independent and Dependent Variables

If you’re reading a study’s write-up, how do you distinguish independent variables from dependent variables? Here are some tips!

Identifying IVs

How statisticians discuss independent variables changes depending on the field of study and type of experiment.

In randomized experiments, look for the following descriptions to identify the independent variables:

• Independent variables cause changes in another variable.
• The researchers control the values of the independent variables. They are controlled or manipulated variables.
• Experiments often refer to them as factors or experimental factors. In areas such as medicine, they might be risk factors.
• Treatment and control groups are always independent variables. In this case, the independent variable is a categorical grouping variable that defines the experimental groups to which participants belong. Each group is a level of that variable.

In observational studies, independent variables are a bit different. While the researchers likely want to establish causation, that’s harder to do with this type of study, so they often won’t use the word “cause.” They also don’t set the values of the predictors. Some independent variables are the experiment’s focus, while others help keep the experimental results valid.

Here’s how to recognize independent variables in observational studies:

• IVs explain the variability, predict, or correlate with changes in the dependent variable.
• Researchers in observational studies must include confounding variables (i.e., confounders) to keep the statistical results valid even if they are not the primary interest of the study. For example, these might include the participants’ socio-economic status or other background information that the researchers aren’t focused on but can explain some of the dependent variable’s variability.
• The results are adjusted or controlled for by a variable.

Regardless of the study type, if you see an estimated effect size, it is an independent variable.

Identifying DVs

Dependent variables are the outcome. The IVs explain the variability or causes changes in the DV. Focus on the “depends” aspect. The value of the dependent variable depends on the IVs. If Y depends on X, then Y is the dependent variable. This aspect applies to both randomized experiments and observational studies.

In an observational study about the effects of smoking, the researchers observe the subjects’ smoking status (smoker/non-smoker) and their lung cancer rates. It’s an observational study because they cannot randomly assign subjects to either the smoking or non-smoking group. In this study, the researchers want to know whether lung cancer rates depend on smoking status. Therefore, the lung cancer rate is the dependent variable.

In a randomized COVID-19 vaccine experiment , the researchers randomly assign subjects to the treatment or control group. They want to determine whether COVID-19 infection rates depend on vaccination status. Hence, the infection rate is the DV.

Note that a variable can be an independent variable in one study but a dependent variable in another. It depends on the context.

For example, one study might assess how the amount of exercise (IV) affects health (DV). However, another study might study the factors (IVs) that influence how much someone exercises (DV). The amount of exercise is an independent variable in one study but a dependent variable in the other!

How Analyses Use IVs and DVs

Regression analysis and ANOVA mathematically describe the relationships between each independent variable and the dependent variable. Typically, you want to determine how changes in one or more predictors associate with changes in the dependent variable. These analyses estimate an effect size for each independent variable.

Suppose researchers study the relationship between wattage, several types of filaments, and the output from a light bulb. In this study, light output is the dependent variable because it depends on the other two variables. Wattage (continuous) and filament type (categorical) are the independent variables.

After performing the regression analysis, the researchers will understand the nature of the relationship between these variables. How much does the light output increase on average for each additional watt? Does the mean light output differ by filament types? They will also learn whether these effects are statistically significant.

Related post : When to Use Regression Analysis

Graphing Independent and Dependent Variables

As I mentioned earlier, graphs traditionally display the independent variables on the horizontal X-axis and the dependent variable on the vertical Y-axis. The type of graph depends on the nature of the variables. Here are a couple of examples.

Suppose you experiment to determine whether various teaching methods affect learning outcomes. Teaching method is a categorical predictor that defines the experimental groups. To display this type of data, you can use a boxplot, as shown below.

The groups are along the horizontal axis, while the dependent variable, learning outcomes, is on the vertical. From the graph, method 4 has the best results. A one-way ANOVA will tell you whether these results are statistically significant. Learn more about interpreting boxplots .

Now, imagine that you are studying people’s height and weight. Specifically, do height increases cause weight to increase? Consequently, height is the independent variable on the horizontal axis, and weight is the dependent variable on the vertical axis. You can use a scatterplot to display this type of data.

It appears that as height increases, weight tends to increase. Regression analysis will tell you if these results are statistically significant. Learn more about interpreting scatterplots .

Share this:

Reader Interactions

April 2, 2024 at 2:05 am

Hi again Jim

Thanks so much for taking an interest in New Zealand’s Equity Index.

Rather than me trying to explain what our Ministry of Education has done, here is a link to a fairly short paper. Scroll down to page 4 of this (if you have the inclination) – https://fyi.org.nz/request/21253/response/80708/attach/4/1301098%20Response%20and%20Appendix.pdf

The Equity Index is used to allocate only 4% of total school funding. The most advantaged 5% of schools get no “equity funding” and the other 95% get a share of the equity funding pool based on their index score. We are talking a maximum of around $1,000NZD per child per year for the most disadvantaged schools. The average amount is around $200-$300 per child per year.

My concern is that I thought the dependent variable is the thing you want to explain or predict using one or more independent variables. Choosing the form of dependent variable that gets a good fit seems to be answering the question “what can we predict well?” rather than “how do we best predict the factor of interest?” The factor is educational achievement and I think this should have been decided upon using theory rather than experimentation with the data.

As it turns out, the Ministry has chosen a measure of educational achievement that puts a heavy weight on achieving an “excellence” rating on a qualification and a much lower weight on simply gaining a qualification. My reading is that they have taken what our universities do when looking at which students to admit.

It doesn’t seem likely to me that a heavy weighting on excellent achievement is appropriate for targeting extra funding to schools with a lot of under-achieving students.

However, my stats knowledge isn’t extensive and it’s definitely rusty, so your thoughts are most helpful.

Regards Kathy Spencer

April 1, 2024 at 4:08 pm

Hi Jim, Great website, thank you.

I have been looking at New Zealand’s Equity Index which is used to allocate a small amount of extra funding to schools attended by children from disadvantaged backgrounds. The Index uses 37 socioeconomic measures relating to a child’s and their parents’ backgrounds that are found to be associated with educational achievement.

I was a bit surprised to read how they had decided on the dependent variable to be used as the measure of educational achievement, or dependent variable. Part of the process was as follows- “Each measure was tested to see the degree to which it could be predicted by the socioeconomic factors selected for the Equity Index.”

Any comment?

Many thanks Kathy Spencer

April 1, 2024 at 9:20 pm

That’s a very complex study and I don’t know much about it. So, that limits what I can say about it. But I’ll give you a few thoughts that come to mind.

This method is common in educational and social research, particularly when the goal is to understand or mitigate the impact of socioeconomic disparities on educational outcomes.

There are the usual concerns about not confusing correlation with causation. However, because this program seems to quantify barriers and then provide extra funding based on the index, I don’t think that’s a problem. They’re not attempting to adjust the socioeconomic measures so no worries about whether they’re directly causal or not.

I might have a small concern about cherry picking the model that happens to maximize the R-squared. Chasing the R-squared rather than having theory drive model selecting is often problematic. Chasing the best fit increases the likelihood that the model fits this specific dataset best by random chance rather than being truly the best. If so, it won’t perform as well outside the dataset used to fit the model. Hopefully, they validated the predicted ability of the model using other data.

However, I’m not sure if the extra funding is determined by the model? I don’t know if the index value is calculated separately outside the candidate models and then fed into the various models. Or does the choice of model affect how the index value is calculated? If it’s the former, then the funding doesn’t depend on a potentially cherry picked model. If the latter, it does.

So, I’m not really clear on the purpose of the model. I’m guessing they just want to validate their Equity Index. And maximizing the R-squared doesn’t really say it’s the best Index but it does at least show that it likely has some merit. I’d be curious how the took the 37 measures and combined them to one index. So, I have more questions than answers. I don’t mean that in a critical sense. Just that I know almost nothing about this program.

I’m curious, what was the outcome they picked? How high was the R-squared? And what were your concerns?

February 6, 2024 at 6:57 pm

Excellent explanation, thank you.

February 5, 2024 at 5:04 pm

Thank you for this insightful blog. Is it valid to use a dependent variable delivered from the mean of independent variables in multiple regression if you want to evaluate the influence of each unique independent variable on the dependent variables?

February 5, 2024 at 11:11 pm

It’s difficult to answer your question because I’m not sure what you mean that the DV is “delivered from the mean of IVs.” If you mean that multiple IVs explain changes in the DV’s mean, yes, that’s the standard use for multiple regression.

If you mean something else, please explain in further detail. Thanks!

February 6, 2024 at 6:32 am

What I meant is; the DV values used as parameters for multiple regression is basically calculated as the average of the IVs. For instance:

From 3 IVs (X1, X2, X3), Y is delivered as :

Y = (Sum of all IVs) / (3)

Then the resulting Y is used as the DV along with the initial IVs to compute the multiple regression.

February 6, 2024 at 2:17 pm

There are a couple of reasons why you shouldn’t do that.

For starters, Y-hat (the predicted value of the regression equation) is the mean of the DV given specific values of the IV. However, that mean is calculated by using the regression coefficients and constant in the regression equation. You don’t calculate the DV mean as the sum of the IVs divided by the number of IVs. Perhaps given a very specific subject-area context, using this approach might seem to make sense but there are other problems.

A critical problem is that the Y is now calculated using the IVs. Instead, the DVs should be measured outcomes and not calculated from IVs. This violates regression assumptions and produces questionable results.

Additionally, it complicates the interpretation. Because the DV is calculated from the IV, you know the regression analysis will find a relationship between them. But you have no idea if that relationship exists in the real world. This complication occurs because your results are based on forcing the DV to equal a function of the IVs and do not reflect real-world outcomes.

In short, DVs should be real-world outcomes that you measure! And be sure to keep your IVs and DV independent. Let the regression analysis estimate the regression equation from your data that contains measured DVs. Don’t use a function to force the DV to equal some function of the IVs because that’s the opposite direction of how regression works!

I hope that helps!

September 6, 2022 at 7:43 pm

Thank you for sharing.

March 3, 2022 at 1:59 am

Excellent explanation.

February 13, 2022 at 12:31 pm

Thanks a lot for creating this excellent blog. This is my go-to resource for Statistics.

I had been pondering over a question for sometime, it would be great if you could shed some light on this.

In linear and non-linear regression, should the distribution of independent and dependent variables be unskewed? When is there a need to transform the data (say, Box-Cox transformation), and do we transform the independent variables as well?

October 28, 2021 at 12:55 pm

If I use a independent variable (X) and it displays a low p-value <.05, why is it if I introduce another independent variable to regression the coefficient and p-value of Y that I used in first regression changes to look insignificant? The second variable that I introduced has a low p-value in regression.

October 29, 2021 at 11:22 pm

Keep in mind that the significance of each IV is calculated after accounting for the variance of all the other variables in the model, assuming you’re using the standard adjusted sums of squares rather than sequential sums of squares. The sums of squares (SS) is a measure of how much dependent variable variability that each IV accounts for. In the illustration below, I’ll assume you’re using the standard of adjusted SS.

So, let’s say that originally you have X1 in the model along with some other IVs. Your model estimates the significance of X1 after assessing the variability that the other IVs account for and finds that X1 is significant. Now, you add X2 to the model in addition to X1 and the other IVs. Now, when assessing X1, the model accounts for the variability of the IVs including the newly added X2. And apparently X2 explains a good portion of the variability. X1 is no longer able to account for that variability, which causes it to not be statistically significant.

In other words, X2 explains some of the variability that X1 previously explained. Because X1 no longer explains it, it is no longer significant.

Additionally, the significance of IVs is more likely to change when you add or remove IVs that are correlated. Correlated IVs is known as multicollinearity. Multicollinearity can be a problem when you have too much. Given the change in significance, I’d check your model for multicollinearity just to be safe! Click the link to read a post that wrote about that!

September 6, 2021 at 8:35 am

nice explanation

August 25, 2021 at 3:09 am

it is excellent explanation

Comments and Questions Cancel reply

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Recommended Articles
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Insights into the effects of tile size and tile overlap levels on semantic segmentation models trained for road surface area extraction from aerial orthophotography.

1. Introduction

• Three tile sizes and two overlap levels were explored and statistically studied in eighteen different training scenarios, given that the combinations of tile overlap, tile size, and semantic segmentation architecture were considered. Three different DL models for semantic segmentation were trained and tested on a very large scale to examine how these factors affect prediction performance.
• The metrics achieved by the trained models on unseen testing data (containing approximately 18 million pixels of the positive class) were statistically analyzed to study the differences between the mean performance and the impact of the training settings on the performance. The p -values were significant for the main effects and for the two-way interaction between tile size and tile overlap and between tile size and DL architecture, with performance significantly affected by the training scenario settings.
• A large-scale visual evaluation of the predictions on the test set was carried out to qualitatively analyze the results, provide further insights, and observe trends in the data. Afterward, an extensive discussion on the significance of the insights and future work directions is provided.

2. Problem Description

3. related work, 5. training method, 6.1. mean performance on the test set grouped by training scenario, 6.2. mean performance on the test data grouped by tile size, tile overlap and semantic segmentation model, 6.3. main and interaction effects with factorial anova, 7. qualitative evaluation, 7.1. general trends, 7.2. areas with higher error rates, 7.3. observed behavior in rural and urban scenes, 7.4. tile size with best predictions and other considerations, 8. discussion, 8.1. on the mean performance, 8.2. on the main and interaction effects, 8.3. on the qualitative evaluation, 8.4. on the uncertainty of the models, limitations of the study, and future directions, 9. conclusions, author contributions, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.

• Cira, C.-I.; Alcarria, R.; Manso-Callejo, M.-Á.; Serradilla, F. A Deep Learning-Based Solution for Large-Scale Extraction of the Secondary Road Network from High-Resolution Aerial Orthoimagery. Appl. Sci. 2020 , 10 , 7272. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cira, C.-I.; Manso-Callejo, M.-Á.; Alcarria, R.; Bordel Sánchez, B.B.; González Matesanz, J.G. State-Level Mapping of the Road Transport Network from Aerial Orthophotography: An End-to-End Road Extraction Solution Based on Deep Learning Models Trained for Recognition, Semantic Segmentation and Post-Processing with Conditional Generative Learning. Remote Sens. 2023 , 15 , 2099. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Manso-Callejo, M.-Á.; Cira, C.-I.; Arranz-Justel, J.-J.; Sinde-González, I.; Sălăgean, T. Assessment of the Large-Scale Extraction of Photovoltaic (PV) Panels with a Workflow Based on Artificial Neural Networks and Algorithmic Postprocessing of Vectorization Results. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2023 , 125 , 103563. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cira, C.-I.; Manso-Callejo, M.-Á.; Yokoya, N.; Sălăgean, T.; Badea, A.-C. Impact of Tile Size and Tile Overlap on the Prediction Performance of Convolutional Neural Networks Trained for Road Classification. Remote Sens. 2024 , 16 , 2818. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Manso-Callejo, M.-Á.; Cira, C.-I.; González-Jiménez, A.; Querol-Pascual, J.-J. Dataset Containing Orthoimages Tagged with Road Information Covering Approximately 8650 Km2 of the Spanish Territory (SROADEX). Data Brief 2022 , 42 , 108316. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Rigollet, P. 18.657: Mathematics of Machine Learning ; Massachusetts Institute of Technology: MIT OpenCourseWare: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015; Volume 7, Available online: https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/18-657-mathematics-of-machine-learning-fall-2015/ (accessed on 19 April 2020).
• Cira, C.-I. Contribution to Object Extraction in Cartography: A Novel Deep Learning-Based Solution to Recognise, Segment and Post-Process the Road Transport Network as a Continuous Geospatial Element in High-Resolution Aerial Orthoimagery. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 2022. Available online: http://oa.upm.es/70152 (accessed on 30 March 2022).
• Neuhold, G. Semantic Segmentation with Deep Neural Networks ; Graz University of Technology: Graz, Austria, 2016; Available online: https://diglib.tugraz.at/download.php?id=576a79b0b18c4&location=browse (accessed on 16 January 2020).
• Bozinovski, S. Reminder of the First Paper on Transfer Learning in Neural Networks, 1976. Inform. Slov. 2020 , 44 , 291–302. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Russakovsky, O.; Deng, J.; Su, H.; Krause, J.; Satheesh, S.; Ma, S.; Huang, Z.; Karpathy, A.; Khosla, A.; Bernstein, M.; et al. ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2015 , 115 , 211–252. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cira, C.-I.; Alcarria, R.; Manso-Callejo, M.-Á.; Serradilla, F. Evaluation of Transfer Learning Techniques with Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to Detect the Existence of Roads in High-Resolution Aerial Imagery. In Applied Informatics ; Florez, H., Leon, M., Diaz-Nafria, J.M., Belli, S., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; Volume 1051, pp. 185–198. ISBN 978-3-030-32474-2. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lv, J.; Shen, Q.; Lv, M.; Li, Y.; Shi, L.; Zhang, P. Deep Learning-Based Semantic Segmentation of Remote Sensing Images: A Review. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2023 , 11 , 1201125. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhao, S.; Feng, Z.; Chen, L.; Li, G. DANet: A Semantic Segmentation Network for Remote Sensing of Roads Based on Dual-ASPP Structure. Electronics 2023 , 12 , 3243. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sharma, P.; Kumar, R.; Gupta, M.; Nayyar, A. A Critical Analysis of Road Network Extraction Using Remote Sensing Images with Deep Learning. Spat. Inf. Res. 2024 , 32 , 1–11. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Xiong, S.; Ma, C.; Yang, G.; Song, Y.; Liang, S.; Feng, J. Semantic Segmentation of Remote Sensing Imagery for Road Extraction via Joint Angle Prediction: Comparisons to Deep Learning. Front. Earth Sci. 2023 , 11 , 1301281. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tao, J.; Chen, Z.; Sun, Z.; Guo, H.; Leng, B.; Yu, Z.; Wang, Y.; He, Z.; Lei, X.; Yang, J. Seg-Road: A Segmentation Network for Road Extraction Based on Transformer and CNN with Connectivity Structures. Remote Sens. 2023 , 15 , 1602. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chen, X.; Sun, Q.; Guo, W.; Qiu, C.; Yu, A. GA-Net: A Geometry Prior Assisted Neural Network for Road Extraction. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2022 , 114 , 103004. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Abdollahi, A.; Pradhan, B.; Sharma, G.; Maulud, K.N.A.; Alamri, A. Improving Road Semantic Segmentation Using Generative Adversarial Network. IEEE Access 2021 , 9 , 64381–64392. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cira, C.-I.; Manso-Callejo, M.-Á.; Alcarria, R.; Fernández Pareja, T.; Bordel Sánchez, B.; Serradilla, F. Generative Learning for Postprocessing Semantic Segmentation Predictions: A Lightweight Conditional Generative Adversarial Network Based on Pix2pix to Improve the Extraction of Road Surface Areas. Land 2021 , 10 , 79. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cira, C.-I.; Kada, M.; Manso-Callejo, M.-Á.; Alcarria, R.; Bordel Sanchez, B.B. Improving Road Surface Area Extraction via Semantic Segmentation with Conditional Generative Learning for Deep Inpainting Operations. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2022 , 11 , 43. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Reina, G.A.; Panchumarthy, R.; Thakur, S.P.; Bastidas, A.; Bakas, S. Systematic Evaluation of Image Tiling Adverse Effects on Deep Learning Semantic Segmentation. Front. Neurosci. 2020 , 14 , 65. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Zhang, H.; Jiang, Z.; Zheng, G.; Yao, X. Semantic Segmentation of High-Resolution Remote Sensing Images with Improved U-Net Based on Transfer Learning. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 2023 , 16 , 181. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ghandorh, H.; Boulila, W.; Masood, S.; Koubaa, A.; Ahmed, F.; Ahmad, J. Semantic Segmentation and Edge Detection—Approach to Road Detection in Very High Resolution Satellite Images. Remote Sens. 2022 , 14 , 613. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• George, G.V.; Hussain, M.S.; Hussain, R.; Jenicka, S. Efficient Road Segmentation Techniques with Attention-Enhanced Conditional GANs. SN Comput. Sci. 2024 , 5 , 176. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tao, A.; Sapra, K.; Catanzaro, B. Hierarchical Multi-Scale Attention for Semantic Segmentation 2020. arXiv 2020 , arXiv:2005.10821. [ Google Scholar ]
• Huang, B.; Reichman, D.; Collins, L.M.; Bradbury, K.; Malof, J.M. Tiling and Stitching Segmentation Output for Remote Sensing: Basic Challenges and Recommendations 2018. arXiv 2018 , arXiv:1805.12219. [ Google Scholar ]
• Neupane, B.; Horanont, T.; Aryal, J. Deep Learning-Based Semantic Segmentation of Urban Features in Satellite Images: A Review and Meta-Analysis. Remote Sens. 2021 , 13 , 808. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Yue, K.; Yang, L.; Li, R.; Hu, W.; Zhang, F.; Li, W. TreeUNet: Adaptive Tree Convolutional Neural Networks for Subdecimeter Aerial Image Segmentation. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2019 , 156 , 1–13. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• De Albuquerque, A.O.; De Carvalho Júnior, O.A.; Carvalho, O.L.F.D.; De Bem, P.P.; Ferreira, P.H.G.; De Moura, R.D.S.; Silva, C.R.; Trancoso Gomes, R.A.; Fontes Guimarães, R. Deep Semantic Segmentation of Center Pivot Irrigation Systems from Remotely Sensed Data. Remote Sens. 2020 , 12 , 2159. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hu, X.; Tang, C.; Chen, H.; Li, X.; Li, J.; Zhang, Z. Improving Image Segmentation with Boundary Patch Refinement. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2022 , 130 , 2571–2589. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Manso-Callejo, M.-Á.; Cira, C.-I.; Alcarria, R.; Arranz-Justel, J.-J. Optimizing the Recognition and Feature Extraction of Wind Turbines through Hybrid Semantic Segmentation Architectures. Remote Sens. 2020 , 12 , 3743. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Manso-Callejo, M.A.; Cira, C.-I.; Alcarria, R.; Gonzalez Matesanz, F.J. First Dataset of Wind Turbine Data Created at National Level with Deep Learning Techniques from Aerial Orthophotographs with a Spatial Resolution of 0.5 m/Pixel. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 2021 , 14 , 7968–7980. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ronneberger, O.; Fischer, P.; Brox, T. U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation. In Proceedings of the Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2015; Navab, N., Hornegger, J., Wells, W.M., Frangi, A.F., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 234–241. [ Google Scholar ]
• Szegedy, C.; Ioffe, S.; Vanhoucke, V.; Alemi, A.A. Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learning. In Proceedings of the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, San Francisco, CA, USA, 4–9 February 2017; Singh, S.P., Markovitch, S., Eds.; AAAI Press: Menlo Park, CA, USA, 2017; pp. 4278–4284. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hu, J.; Shen, L.; Sun, G. Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 18–23 June 2018; IEEE: Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 2018; pp. 7132–7141. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chaurasia, A.; Culurciello, E. LinkNet: Exploiting Encoder Representations for Efficient Semantic Segmentation. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Visual Communications and Image Processing (VCIP), St. Petersburg, FL, USA, 10–13 December 2017; pp. 1–4. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tan, M.; Le, Q.V. EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2019, Long Beach, CA, USA, 9–15 June 2019; Chaudhuri, K., Salakhutdinov, R., Eds.; PMLR: Long Beach, CA, USA, 2019; Volume 97, pp. 6105–6114. Available online: http://proceedings.mlr.press/v97/tan19a.html (accessed on 19 April 2020).
• Yakubovskiy, P. Segmentation Models ; GitHub: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2019; Available online: https://github.com/qubvel/segmentation_models (accessed on 16 October 2020).
• Chollet, F. Keras. Available online: https://github.com/fchollet/keras (accessed on 14 May 2020).
• Abadi, M.; Agarwal, A.; Barham, P.; Brevdo, E.; Chen, Z.; Citro, C.; Corrado, G.S.; Davis, A.; Dean, J.; Devin, M.; et al. TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Systems ; USENIX Association: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2015; Available online: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3026877.3026899 (accessed on 30 March 2020).
• Manso Callejo, M.A.; Cira, C.I.; Iturrioz, T. Train and Evaluation Code, Road Classification Models and Test Set of the Paper “Insights into the Effects of Image Overlap and Image Size on Semantic Segmentation Models Trained for Road Surface Area Extraction from Aerial Orthophotography”. 2024. Available online: https://zenodo.org/records/11494833 (accessed on 11 June 2024).
• IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Macintosh. Available online: https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/ibm-spss-statistics-29-documentation (accessed on 18 March 2024).

Click here to enlarge figure

Share and Cite

Cira, C.-I.; Manso-Callejo, M.-Á.; Alcarria, R.; Iturrioz, T.; Arranz-Justel, J.-J. Insights into the Effects of Tile Size and Tile Overlap Levels on Semantic Segmentation Models Trained for Road Surface Area Extraction from Aerial Orthophotography. Remote Sens. 2024 , 16 , 2954. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16162954

Cira C-I, Manso-Callejo M-Á, Alcarria R, Iturrioz T, Arranz-Justel J-J. Insights into the Effects of Tile Size and Tile Overlap Levels on Semantic Segmentation Models Trained for Road Surface Area Extraction from Aerial Orthophotography. Remote Sensing . 2024; 16(16):2954. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16162954

Cira, Calimanut-Ionut, Miguel-Ángel Manso-Callejo, Ramon Alcarria, Teresa Iturrioz, and José-Juan Arranz-Justel. 2024. "Insights into the Effects of Tile Size and Tile Overlap Levels on Semantic Segmentation Models Trained for Road Surface Area Extraction from Aerial Orthophotography" Remote Sensing 16, no. 16: 2954. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16162954

Article Metrics

Further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals