research paper on water resources management

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• Review Article
• Published: 31 January 2023

Global water resources and the role of groundwater in a resilient water future

• Bridget R. Scanlon   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1234-4199 1 ,
• Sarah Fakhreddine 1 , 2 ,
• Ashraf Rateb 1 ,
• Inge de Graaf   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7748-868X 3 ,
• Jay Famiglietti 4 ,
• Tom Gleeson 5 ,
• R. Quentin Grafton 6 ,
• Esteban Jobbagy 7 ,
• Seifu Kebede 8 ,
• Seshagiri Rao Kolusu 9 ,
• Leonard F. Konikow 10 ,
• Di Long   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9033-5039 11 ,
• Mesfin Mekonnen   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3573-9759 12 ,
• Hannes Müller Schmied 13 , 14 ,
• Abhijit Mukherjee 15 ,
• Alan MacDonald   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-6636-1499 16 ,
• Robert C. Reedy 1 ,
• Mohammad Shamsudduha 17 ,
• Craig T. Simmons 18 ,
• Alex Sun 1 ,
• Richard G. Taylor 19 ,
• Karen G. Villholth 20 ,
• Charles J. Vörösmarty 21 &
• Chunmiao Zheng   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5839-1305 22  

Nature Reviews Earth & Environment volume  4 ,  pages 87–101 ( 2023 ) Cite this article

16k Accesses

207 Citations

286 Altmetric

Metrics details

• Hydrogeology
• Water resources

An Author Correction to this article was published on 29 March 2023

This article has been updated

Water is a critical resource, but ensuring its availability faces challenges from climate extremes and human intervention. In this Review, we evaluate the current and historical evolution of water resources, considering surface water and groundwater as a single, interconnected resource. Total water storage trends have varied across regions over the past century. Satellite data from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) show declining, stable and rising trends in total water storage over the past two decades in various regions globally. Groundwater monitoring provides longer-term context over the past century, showing rising water storage in northwest India, central Pakistan and the northwest United States, and declining water storage in the US High Plains and Central Valley. Climate variability causes some changes in water storage, but human intervention, particularly irrigation, is a major driver. Water-resource resilience can be increased by diversifying management strategies. These approaches include green solutions, such as forest and wetland preservation, and grey solutions, such as increasing supplies (desalination, wastewater reuse), enhancing storage in surface reservoirs and depleted aquifers, and transporting water. A diverse portfolio of these solutions, in tandem with managing groundwater and surface water as a single resource, can address human and ecosystem needs while building a resilient water system.

Net trends in total water storage data from the GRACE satellite mission range from −310 km 3 to 260 km 3 total over a 19-year record in different regions globally, caused by climate and human intervention.

Groundwater and surface water are strongly linked, with 85% of groundwater withdrawals sourced from surface water capture and reduced evapotranspiration, and the remaining 15% derived from aquifer depletion.

Climate and human interventions caused loss of ~90,000 km 2 of surface water area between 1984 and 2015, while 184,000 km 2 of new surface water area developed elsewhere, primarily through filling reservoirs.

Human intervention affects water resources directly through water use, particularly irrigation, and indirectly through land-use change, such as agricultural expansion and urbanization.

Strategies for increasing water-resource resilience include preserving and restoring forests and wetlands, and conjunctive surface water and groundwater management.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals

Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription

24,99 € / 30 days

cancel any time

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles

92,52 € per year

only 7,71 € per issue

Buy this article

• Purchase on SpringerLink
• Instant access to full article PDF

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Environmental flow limits to global groundwater pumping

Divergent effects of climate change on future groundwater availability in key mid-latitude aquifers

Global peak water limit of future groundwater withdrawals

Change history, 29 march 2023.

A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-023-00418-9

Vorosmarty, C. J. et al. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467 , 555–561 (2010).

Article   Google Scholar  

Doell, P., Mueller Schmied, H., Schuh, C., Portmann, F. T. & Eicker, A. Global-scale assessment of groundwater depletion and related groundwater abstractions: combining hydrological modeling with information from well observations and GRACE satellites. Water Resour. Res. 50 , 5698–5720 (2014).

Wada, Y. et al. Global depletion of groundwater resources. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37 , L20402 (2010).

Douville, H. et al. in Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) 1055–1210 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).

Olivier, D. W. & Xu, Y. X. Making effective use of groundwater to avoid another water supply crisis in Cape Town, South Africa. Hydrogeol. J. 27 , 823–826 (2019).

Ozment, S. et al. Natural infrastructure in Sao Paulo’s water system. World Resources Institute Report 2013–2014: Interim Findings (2018).

Pascale, S., Kapnick, S. B., Delworth, T. L. & Cooke, W. F. Increasing risk of another Cape Town ‘Day Zero’ drought in the 21st century. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117 , 29495 (2020).

Alley, W. M., Reilly, T. E. & Franke, O. L. Sustainability of ground-water resources. US Geological Survey Circular 1186 (1999).

Breslin, S. COP26 has 4 goals. Water is central to all of them. SIWI News https://siwi.org/latest/cop26-has-4-goals-water-is-central-to-all-of-them/ (2021).

Global Risks 2021 16th edition (World Economic Forum, 2021); https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-risks-report-2021/

The Water Challenge: The Roundtable on Water Financing (OECD, 2022); https://www.oecd.org/water/roundtable-on-financing-water.htm

The United Nations World Water Development Report 2018: Nature-Based Solutions for Water (United Nations World Water Assessment Program/UNESCO, 2018).

Browder, G., Ozment, S., Rehberger-Bescos, I., Gartner, T. & Lange, G. M. Integrating Green and Gray: Creating Next Generation Infrastructure (World Bank and World Resources Institute, 2019); https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/31430

Making Every Drop Count: Agenda for Water Action (High Level Panel on Water, United Nations and World Bank, 2018).

Lederer, E. M. Next UN assembly president warns world in dangerous crisis. Washington Post https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/next-un-assembly-president-warns-world-in-dangerous-crisis/2022/06/07/55075dce-e6b6-11ec-a422-11bbb91db30b_story.html (7 June 2022).

Tapley, B. D. et al. Contributions of GRACE to understanding climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 9 , 358–369 (2019).

Wada, Y. & Bierkens, M. F. P. Sustainability of global water use: past reconstruction and future projections. Environ. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/10/104003 (2014).

Mekonnen, M. M. & Hoekstra, A. Y. Blue water footprint linked to national consumption and international trade is unsustainable. Nat. Food 1 , 792–800 (2020).

Rodell, M. et al. Emerging trends in global freshwater availability. Nature 557 , 651–659 (2018).

Save, H., Bettadpur, S. & Tapley, B. D. High-resolution CSR GRACE RL05 mascons. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 121 , 7547–7569 (2016).

Tapley, B. D., Bettadpur, S., Watkins, M. & Reigber, C. The Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment: mission overview and early results. Geophys. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004gl019920 (2004).

Richey, A. S. et al. Quantifying renewable groundwater stress with GRACE. Water Resour. Res. 51 , 5217–5238 (2015).

Shamsudduha, M. & Taylor, R. G. Groundwater storage dynamics in the world’s large aquifer systems from GRACE: uncertainty and role of extreme precipitation. Earth Syst. Dyn. 11 , 755–774 (2020).

Vishwakarma, B. D., Bates, P., Sneeuw, N., Westaway, R. M. & Bamber, J. L. Re-assessing global water storage trends from GRACE time series. Environ. Res. Lett. 16 , 034005 (2021).

Pekel, J. F., Cottam, A., Gorelick, N. & Belward, A. S. High-resolution mapping of global surface water and its long-term changes. Nature 540 , 418–436 (2016).

Lehner, B. et al. High-resolution mapping of the world’s reservoirs and dams for sustainable river-flow management. Front. Ecol. Environ. 9 , 494–502 (2011).

Scanlon, B. R. et al. Global models underestimate large decadal declining and rising water storage trends relative to GRACE satellite data. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115 , E1080–E1089 (2018).

Winter, T. C., Harvey, J. W., Franke, O. L. & Alley, W. M. Ground Water and Surface Water: A Single Resource . Circular 1139 (United States Geological Survey, 1998).

Konikow, L. F. Overestimated water storage. Nat. Geosci. 6 , 3 (2013).

Konikow, L. F. Contribution of global groundwater depletion since 1900 to sea-level rise. Geophys. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011gl048604 (2011).

Pokhrel, Y. N. et al. Model estimates of sea-level change due to anthropogenic impacts on terrestrial water storage. Nat. Geosci. 5 , 389–392 (2012).

de Graaf, I. E. M. et al. A global-scale two-layer transient groundwater model: development and application to groundwater depletion. Adv. Water Resour. 102 , 53–67 (2017).

Rateb, A. et al. Comparison of groundwater storage changes from GRACE satellites with monitoring and modeling of major U.S. aquifers. Water Resour. Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027556 (2020).

de Graaf, I. E. M., Gleeson, T., van Beek, L. P. H., Sutanudjaja, E. H. & Bierkens, M. F. P. Environmental flow limits to global groundwater pumping. Nature 574 , 90–94 (2019).

Sophocleous, M. From safe yield to sustainable development of water resources — the Kansas experience. J. Hydrol. 235 , 27–43 (2000).

Konikow, L. F. & Bredehoeft, J. D. Groundwater Resource Development: Effects and Sustainability (The Groundwater Project, 2020).

MacAllister, D. J., Krishan, G., Basharat, M., Cuba, D. & MacDonald, A. M. A century of groundwater accumulation in Pakistan and northwest India. Nat. Geosci. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-00926-1 (2022).

Scanlon, B. R. et al. Effects of climate and irrigation on GRACE-based estimates of water storage changes in major US aquifers. Environ. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac16ff (2021).

McGuire, V. L. Water-Level and Recoverable Water In Storage Changes, High Plains Aquifer, Predevelopment to 2015 and 2013–15 . US Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2017–5040 (2017); https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20175040

Faunt, C. C. Groundwater availability of the Central Valley Aquifer, California. US Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap . 1766 (2009).

Vorosmarty, C. J., Green, P., Salisbury, J. & Lammers, R. B. Global water resources: vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Science 289 , 284–288 (2000).

Mekonnen, M. M. & Hoekstra, A. Y. Four billion people facing severe water scarcity. Sci. Adv. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500323 (2016).

Vorosmarty, C. J. & Sahagian, D. Anthropogenic disturbance of the terrestrial water cycle. Bioscience 50 , 753–765 (2000).

Gronwall, J. & Danert, K. Regarding groundwater and drinking water access through a human rights lens: self-supply as a norm. Water https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020419 (2020).

van Vliet, M. T. H. et al. Global water scarcity including surface water quality and expansions of clean water technologies. Environ. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abbfc3 (2021).

Podgorski, J. & Berg, M. Global threat of arsenic in groundwater. Science 368 , 845–850 (2020).

Yapiyev, V., Sagintayev, Z., Inglezakis, V. J., Samarkhanov, K. & Verhoef, A. Essentials of endorheic basins and lakes: a review in the context of current and future water resource management and mitigation activities in Central Asia. Water https://doi.org/10.3390/w9100798 (2017).

Pauloo, R. A., Fogg, G. E., Guo, Z. L. & Harter, T. Anthropogenic basin closure and groundwater salinization (ABCSAL). J. Hydrol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125787 (2021).

Cao, T. Z., Han, D. M. & Song, X. F. Past, present, and future of global seawater intrusion research: a bibliometric analysis. J. Hydrol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126844 (2021).

Werner, A. D. et al. Seawater intrusion processes, investigation and management: recent advances and future challenges. Adv. Water Resour. 51 , 3–26 (2013).

Held, I. M. & Soden, B. J. Robust responses of the hydrological cycle to global warming. J. Clim. 19 , 5686–5699 (2006).

Fan, X., Duan, Q. Y., Shen, C. P., Wu, Y. & Xing, C. Global surface air temperatures in CMIP6: historical performance and future changes. Environ. Res. Lett. 15 , 104056 (2020).

Tabari, H. Climate change impact on flood and extreme precipitation increases with water availability. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70816-2 (2020).

Williams, A. P. et al. Large contribution from anthropogenic warming to an emerging North American megadrought. Science 368 , 314 (2020).

Arias, P. A. et al. in Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) 33−144 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).

van Dijk, A. et al. The Millennium Drought in southeast Australia (2001–2009): natural and human causes and implications for water resources, ecosystems, economy, and society. Water Resour. Res. 49 , 1040–1057 (2013).

Scanlon, B. R. et al. Hydrologic implications of GRACE satellite data in the Colorado River Basin. Water Resour. Res. 51 , 9891–9903 (2015).

Rateb, A., Scanlon, B. R. & Kuo, C. Y. Multi-decadal assessment of water budget and hydrological extremes in the Tigris-Euphrates Basin using satellites, modeling, and in-situ data. Sci. Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144337 (2021).

Anyamba, A., Glennie, E. & Small, J. Teleconnections and interannual transitions as observed in African vegetation: 2015–2017. Remote Sens. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10071038 (2018).

Scanlon, B. R. et al. Linkages between GRACE water storage, hydrologic extremes, and climate teleconnections in major African aquifers. Environ. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac3bfc (2022).

Ul Hassan, W. & Nayak, M. A. Global teleconnections in droughts caused by oceanic and atmospheric circulation patterns. Environ. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc9e2 (2021).

Shen, Z. X. et al. Drying in the low-latitude Atlantic Ocean contributed to terrestrial water storage depletion across Eurasia. Nat. Commun. 13 , 1849 (2022).

Dettinger, M. D. Atmospheric rivers as drought busters on the US West Coast. J. Hydrometeorol. 14 , 1721–1732 (2013).

Taylor, R. G. et al. Ground water and climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 3 , 322–329 (2013).

Cuthbert, M. O. et al. Observed controls on resilience of groundwater to climate variability in sub-Saharan Africa. Nature 572 , 230 (2019).

Hugonnet, R. et al. Accelerated global glacier mass loss in the early twenty-first century. Nature 592 , 726 (2021).

Zhao, F., Long, D., Li, X., Huang, Q. & Han, P. Rapid glacier mass loss in the Southeastern Tibetan Plateau since the year 2000 from satellite observations. Remote. Sens. Environ. 270 , 112853 (2022).

Li, X. Y. et al. Climate change threatens terrestrial water storage over the Tibetan Plateau. Nat. Clim. Change https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01443-0 (2022).

Yao, T. D. et al. The imbalance of the Asian water tower. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00299-4 (2022).

Immerzeel, W. W., van Beek, L. P. H. & Bierkens, M. F. P. Climate change will affect the Asian water towers. Science 328 , 1382–1385 (2010).

Immerzeel, W. W. et al. Importance and vulnerability of the world’s water towers. Nature 577 , 364 (2020).

Dery, S. J. et al. Detection of runoff timing changes in pluvial, nival, and glacial rivers of western Canada. Water Resour. Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008wr006975 (2009).

Siebert, S. et al. Groundwater use for irrigation – a global inventory. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 7 , 3977–4021 (2010).

Google Scholar  

Scanlon, B. R. et al. Groundwater depletion and sustainability of irrigation in the US High Plains and Central Valley. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109 , 9320–9325 (2012).

Dahlke, H. E. et al. in Advanced Tools for Integrated Water Resources Management Vol. 3 (eds Friesen, J. & Rodriguez-Sinobas, L.) 215–275 (Elsevier, 2018).

Reddy, V. R., Pavelic, P. & Hanjra, M. A. Underground taming of floods for irrigation (UTFI) in the river basins of South Asia: institutionalising approaches and policies for sustainable water management and livelihood enhancement. Water Policy 20 , 369–387 (2018).

McDonald, R. I., Weber, K. F., Padowski, J., Boucher, T. & Shemie, D. Estimating watershed degradation over the last century and its impact on water-treatment costs for the world’s large cities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113 , 9117–9122 (2016).

The State of the World’s Forests 2020. Forests, Biodiversity, and Peopl e (FAO/UNEP, 2020).

Convention on Wetlands. Global Wetland Outlook: Special Edition 2021 (Secretariat of the Convention on Wetlands, 2021).

Scanlon, B. R., Jolly, I., Sophocleous, M. & Zhang, L. Global impacts of conversions from natural to agricultural ecosystems on water resources: quantity versus quality. Water Resour. Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005486 (2007).

Nosetto, M. D., Paez, R. A., Ballesteros, S. I. & Jobbagy, E. G. Higher water-table levels and flooding risk under grain vs. livestock production systems in the subhumid plains of the Pampas. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 206 , 60–70 (2015).

Favreau, G. et al. Land clearing, climate variability, and water resources increase in semiarid southwest Niger: a review. Water Resour. Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007wr006785 (2009).

Walker, C. D., Zhang, l, Ellis, T. W., Hatton, T. J. & Petheram, C. Estimating impacts of changed land use on recharge: review of modelling and other approaches appropriate for management of dryland salinity. Hydrogeol. J. 10 , 68–90 (2002).

Nosetto, M. D., Jobbagy, E. G., Jackson, R. B. & Sznaider, G. A. Reciprocal influence of crops and shallow ground water in sandy landscapes of the Inland Pampas. Field Crops Res. 113 , 138–148 (2009).

Gimenez, R., Mercau, J., Nosetto, M., Paez, R. & Jobbagy, E. The ecohydrological imprint of deforestation in the semiarid Chaco: insights from the last forest remnants of a highly cultivated landscape. Hydrol. Process. 30 , 2603–2616 (2016).

Eilers, R. G., Eilers, W. D. & Fitzgerald, M. M. A salinity risk index for soils of the Canadian prairies. Hydrogeol. J. 5 , 68–79 (1997).

Progress on Household Drinking Water, Sanitation and Hygiene 2000–2020: Five Years into the SDGs (WHO/UNICEF, 2021).

Cobbing, J. & Hiller, B. Waking a sleeping giant: realizing the potential of groundwater in sub-Saharan Africa. World Dev. 122 , 597–613 (2019).

Rockström, J. & Falkenmark, M. Agriculture: increase water harvesting in Africa. Nature 519 , 283–285 (2015).

MacAllister, D. J., MacDonald, A. M., Kebede, S., Godfrey, S. & Calow, R. Comparative performance of rural water supplies during drought. Nat. Commun. 11 , 1099 (2020).

Aboah, M. & Miyittah, M. K. Estimating global water, sanitation, and hygiene levels and related risks on human health, using global indicators data from 1990 to 2020. J. Water Health 20 , 1091–1101 (2022).

Abell, R. et al. Beyond the Source: The Environmental, Economic and Community Benefits of Source Water Protection (The Nature Conservancy, 2017).

Herrera-Garcia, G. et al. Mapping the global threat of land subsidence. Science 371 , 34–36 (2021).

Scanlon, B. R., Reedy, R. C., Faunt, C. C., Pool, D. & Uhlman, K. Enhancing drought resilience with conjunctive use and managed aquifer recharge in California and Arizona. Environ. Res. Lett. 11 , 035013 (2016).

Qadir, M. et al. Global and regional potential of wastewater as a water, nutrient and energy source. Nat. Resour. Forum 44 , 40–51 (2020).

Water Reuse within a Circular Economy Context . Global Water Security Issues Series 2 (UNESCO, 2020).

Jones, E. R., van Vliet, M. T. H., Qadir, M. & Bierkens, M. F. P. Country-level and gridded estimates of wastewater production, collection, treatment and reuse. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 13 , 237–254 (2021).

Jeuland, M. Challenges to wastewater reuse in the Middle East and North Africa. Middle East. Dev. J. 7 , 1–25 (2015).

Zhang, Y. & Shen, Y. Wastewater irrigation: past, present, and future. WIREs Water 6 , e1234 (2019).

Fito, J. & Van Hulle, S. W. H. Wastewater reclamation and reuse potentials in agriculture: towards environmental sustainability. Environ. Dev. Sust. 23 , 2949–2972 (2021).

Gao, L., Yoshikawa, S., Iseri, Y., Fujimori, S. & Kanae, S. An economic assessment of the global potential for seawater desalination to 2050. Water https://doi.org/10.3390/w9100763 (2017).

Ahdab, Y. D., Thiel, G. P., Bohlke, J. K., Stanton, J. & Lienhard, J. H. Minimum energy requirements for desalination of brackish groundwater in the United States with comparison to international datasets. Water Res. 141 , 387–404 (2018).

Jones, E., Qadir, M., van Vliet, M. T. H., Smakhtin, V. & Kang, S. M. The state of desalination and brine production: a global outlook. Sci. Total Environ. 657 , 1343–1356 (2019).

Lin, S. S. et al. Seawater desalination technology and engineering in China: a review. Desalination https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2020.114728 (2021).

Martinez-Alvarez, V., Martin-Gorriz, B. & Soto-Garcia, M. Seawater desalination for crop irrigation — a review of current experiences and revealed key issues. Desalination 381 , 58–70 (2016).

Smith, K., Liu, S. M., Hu, H. Y., Dong, X. & Wen, X. H. Water and energy recovery: the future of wastewater in China. Sci. Total Environ. 637 , 1466–1470 (2018).

Pulido-Bosch, A. et al. Impacts of agricultural irrigation on groundwater salinity. Environ/ Earth Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7386-6 (2018).

Kurnik, J. The Next California: Phase 1: Investigating Potential in the Mid-Mississippi Delta River Region (The Markets Institute at WWF, 2020); https://www.worldwildlife.org/publications/the-next-california-phase-1-investigating-potential-in-the-mid-mississippi-delta-river-region

Senay, G. B., Schauer, M., Friedrichs, M., Velpuri, N. M. & Singh, R. K. Satellite-based water use dynamics using historical Landsat data (1984–2014) in the southwestern United States. Remote Sens. Environ. 202 , 98–112 (2017).

Gebremichael, M., Krishnamurthy, P. K., Ghebremichael, L. T. & Alam, S. What drives crop land use change during multi-year droughts in California’s Central Valley? Prices or concern for water? Remote Sens. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13040650 (2021).

Brauman, K. A., Siebert, S. & Foley, J. A. Improvements in crop water productivity increase water sustainability and food security — a global analysis. Environ. Res. Lett. 8 , 024030 (2013).

Mekonnen, M. M., Hoekstra, A. Y., Neale, C. M. U., Ray, C. & Yang, H. S. Water productivity benchmarks: the case of maize and soybean in Nebraska. Agric. Water Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106122 (2020).

Colaizzi, P. D., Gowda, P. H., Marek, T. H. & Porter, D. O. Irrigation in the Texas High Plains: a brief history and potential reductions in demand. Irrig. Drain. 58 , 257–274 (2008).

Scanlon, B. R., Gates, J. B., Reedy, R. C., Jackson, A. & Bordovsky, J. Effects of irrigated agroecosystems: (2). Quality of soil water and groundwater in the southern High Plains, Texas. Water Resour. Res. 46 , W09538 (2010).

Ward, F. A. & Pulido-Velazquez, M. Water conservation in irrigation can increase water use. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105 , 18215–18220 (2008).

Grafton, R. Q. et al. The paradox of irrigation efficiency. Science 361 , 748–750 (2018).

Alcott, B. in The Jevons Paradox and the Myth of Resource Efficiency Improvements (eds Polimeni, J. M., Mayumi, K., & Giampetro, M.) 7–78 (Earthscan, 2008).

Aarnoudse, E. & Bluemling, B. Controlling Groundwater Through Smart Card Machines: The Case of Water Quotas and Pricing Mechanisms in Gansu Province, China . Groundwater Solutions Initiative for Policy and Practice (GRIPP) Case Profile Series 02 (International Water Management Institute, 2017); https://doi.org/10.5337/2016.224

Kinzelbach, W., Wang, H., Li, Y., Wang, L. & Li, N. Groundwater Overexploitation in the North China Plain: A Path to Sustainability (Springer, 2021).

McDougall, R., Kristiansen, P. & Rader, R. Small-scale urban agriculture results in high yields but requires judicious management of inputs to achieve sustainability. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116 , 129–134 (2019).

Langemeyer, J., Madrid-Lopez, C., Mendoza Beltran, A. & Villalba Mendez, G. Urban agriculture — a necessary pathway towards urban resilience and global sustainability? Landsc. Urban Plan. 210 , 104055 (2021).

Palmer, L. Urban agriculture growth in US cities. Nat. Sust. 1 , 5–7 (2018).

Grafius, D. R. et al. Estimating food production in an urban landscape. Sci. Rep. 10 , 5141 (2020).

The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2015 (FAO/IFAD/WFP, 2015).

Kummu, M. et al. Lost food, wasted resources: global food supply chain losses and their impacts on freshwater, cropland, and fertiliser use. Sci. Total Environ. 438 , 477–489 (2012).

Gleick, P. H. Global freshwater resources: soft-path solutions for the 21st century. Science 302 , 1524–1528 (2003).

Miralles-Wilhelm, F. Nature-Based Solutions in Agriculture — Sustainable Management and Conservation of Land, Water, and Biodiversity (FAO/The Nature Conservancy, 2021).

McDonald, R. I. & Shemie, D. Urban Water Blueprint: Mapping Conservation Solutions to the Global Water Challenge (The Nature Conservancy, 2014); http://water.nature.org/waterblueprint

Kane, M. & Erickson, J. D. Urban metabolism and payment for ecosystem services: history and policy analysis of the New York city water supply. Adv. Econ. Environ. Resour. 7 , 307–328 (2007).

Greater Cape Town Water Fund: Business Case: Assessing the Return on Investment for Ecological Infrastructure Restoration (The Nature Conservancy, 2019).

Hu, J., Lu, Y. H., Fu, B. J., Comber, A. J. & Harris, P. Quantifying the effect of ecological restoration on runoff and sediment yields: a meta-analysis for the Loess Plateau of China. Prog. Phys. Geogr. Earth Environ. 41 , 753–774 (2017).

Liu, W. W. et al. Improving wetland ecosystem health in China. Ecol. Indic. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106184 (2020).

Cities100: Chennai Is Restoring Waterbodies to Protect Against Flooding and Drought . C40 Knowledge Hub: Nordic Sustainability, South and West Asia, Chennai, Case Studies and Best Practice Examples https://www.c40knowledgehub.org/s/article/Cities100-Chennai-is-restoring-waterbodies-to-protect-against-flooding-and-drought?language=en_US (2019).

Chung, M. G., Frank, K. A., Pokhrel, Y., Dietz, T. & Liu, J. G. Natural infrastructure in sustaining global urban freshwater ecosystem services. Nat. Sust. 4 , 1068 (2021).

Qi, Y. F. et al. Addressing challenges of urban water management in Chinese sponge cities via nature-based solutions. Water https://doi.org/10.3390/w12102788 (2020).

Acreman, M. et al. Evidence for the effectiveness of nature-based solutions to water issues in Africa. Environ. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac0210 (2021).

Livneh, B. & Badger, A. M. Drought less predictable under declining future snowpack. Nat. Clim. Change 10 , 452–458 (2020).

Mulligan, M., van Soesbergen, A. & Sáenz, L. GOODD, a global dataset of more than 38,000 georeferenced dams. Sci. Data 7 , 31 (2020).

International Commission on Large Dams https://www.icold-cigb.org/ (2022).

Yang, G., Guo, S., Liu, P. & Block, P. Integration and evaluation of forecast-informed multiobjective reservoir operations. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 146 , 04020038 (2020).

Delaney, C. J. et al. Forecast informed reservoir operations using ensemble streamflow predictions for a multipurpose reservoir in northern California. Water Resour. Res . https://doi.org/10.1029/2019wr026604 (2020).

Amarasinghe, U. A., Muthuwatta, L., Surinaidu, L., Anand, S. & Jain, S. K. Reviving the Ganges water machine: potential. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 20 , 1085–1101 (2016).

Shamsudduha, M. et al. The Bengal water machine: quantified freshwater capture in Bangladesh. Science 377 , 1315–1319 (2022).

Chao, B. F., Wu, Y. H. & Li, Y. S. Impact of artificial reservoir water impoundment on global sea level. Science 320 , 212–214 (2008).

Zarfl, C., Lumsdon, A. E., Berlekamp, J., Tydecks, L. & Tockner, K. A global boom in hydropower dam construction. Aquat. Sci. 77 , 161–170 (2015).

Zarfl, C. et al. Future large hydropower dams impact global freshwater megafauna. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54980-8 (2019).

Wheeler, K. G., Jeuland, M., Hall, J. W., Zagona, E. & Whittington, D. Understanding and managing new risks on the Nile with the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19089-x (2020).

Di Baldassarre, G. et al. Water shortages worsened by reservoir effects. Nat. Sust. 1 , 617–622 (2018).

Dahlke, H. E., Brown, A. G., Orloff, S., Putnam, D. & O’Geen, T. Managed winter flooding of alfalfa recharges groundwater with minimal crop damage. Calif. Agric. 72 , 65–75 (2018).

Yang, Q. & Scanlon, B. R. How much water can be captured from flood flows to store in depleted aquifers for mitigating floods and droughts? A case study from Texas, US. Environ. Res. Lett. 14 , 054011 (2019).

Dillon, P. et al. Sixty years of global progress in managed aquifer recharge. Hydrogeol. J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-018-1841-z. (2018).

Groundwater Replenishment System Technical Brochure, https://www.ocwd.com/media/10443/gwrs-technical-brochure-2021.pdf (2021).

Konikow, L. F. Groundwater Depletion in the United States (1900–2008) . US Geological Survey Scientific Investigation Report 2013–5079, http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2013/5079 (2013).

Hartog, N. & Stuyfzand, P. J. Water quality donsiderations on the rise as the use of managed aquifer recharge systems widens. Water 9 , 808 (2017).

Shumilova, O., Tockner, K., Thieme, M., Koska, A. & Zarfl, C. Global water transfer megaprojects: a potential solution for the water–food–energy nexus? Front. Environ. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2018.00150 (2018).

Long, D. et al. South-to-north water diversion stabilizing Beijing’s groundwater levels. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17428-6 (2020).

Zhuang, W. Eco-environmental impact of inter-basin water transfer projects: a review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 23 , 12867–12879 (2016).

Hoekstra, A. Y. Virtual Water Trade : Proceedings of the International Expert Meeting on Virtual Water Trade (UNESCO-IHE, 2003).

Oki, T. & Kanae, S. Virtual water trade and world water resources. Water Sci. Technol. 49 , 203–209 (2004).

Dolan, F. et al. Evaluating the economic impact of water scarcity in a changing world. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22194-0 (2021).

Hoekstra, A. Y. & Mekonnen, M. M. The water footprint of humanity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109 , 3232–3237 (2012).

Dalin, C., Wada, Y., Kastner, T. & Puma, M. J. Groundwater depletion embedded in international food trade. Nature 543 , 700–704 (2017).

Hanasaki, N., Inuzuka, T., Kanae, S. & Oki, T. An estimation of global virtual water flow and sources of water withdrawal for major crops and livestock products using a global hydrological model. J. Hydrol. 384 , 232–244 (2010).

Mekonnen, M. M. & Gerbens-Leenes, W. The water footprint of global food production. Water https://doi.org/10.3390/w12102696 (2020).

Australian Water Markets Report: 2019-20 Review and 2020-21 Outlook (Aither, 2020); https://aither.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/2020-Water-Markets-Report.pdf

Grafton, R. Q. & Wheeler, S. A. Economics of water recovery in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 10 , 487–510 (2018).

Moench, M. Water and the potential for social instability: livelihoods, migration and the building of society. Nat. Resour. Forum 26 , 195–204 (2002).

Water Markets in Australia: A Short History (National Water Commission, 2011).

Kundzewicz, Z. W. & Döll, P. Will groundwater ease freshwater stress under climate change? Hydrol. Sci. J. 54 , 665–675 (2009).

A Snapshot of the World’s Water Quality: Towards a Global Assessment (UNEP, 2016).

Summary Progress Update 2021: SDG 6 — Water and Sanitation for All (UN-Water, 2021).

GEMStat: Global Environmental Monitoring System, https://gemstat.org/ (UNEP, 2022).

Akhmouch, A. & Correia, F. N. The 12 OECD principles on water governance — when science meets policy. Util. Policy 43 , 14–20 (2016).

Lankford, B., Bakker, K., Zeitoun, M. & Conway, B. D. Water Security: Principles, Perspectives, and Practices (Routledge, 2013).

Potapov, P. et al. Global maps of cropland extent and change show accelerated cropland expansion in the twenty-first century. Nat. Food 3 , 19 (2022).

Fan, Y., Li, H. & Miguez-Macho, G. Global patterns of groundwater table depth. Science 339 , 940–943 (2013).

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Bureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA

Bridget R. Scanlon, Sarah Fakhreddine, Ashraf Rateb, Robert C. Reedy & Alex Sun

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Sarah Fakhreddine

Water Systems and Global Change, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands

Inge de Graaf

Global Institute for Water Security, National Hydrology Research Center, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada

Jay Famiglietti

Department of Civil Engineering, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Tom Gleeson

Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia

R. Quentin Grafton

Grupo de Estudios Ambientales, IMASL, CONICET, Universidad Nacional de San Luis, San Luis, Argentina

Esteban Jobbagy

Center for Water Resources Research, School of Agricultural, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of KwaZulu Natal, Durban, South Africa

Seifu Kebede

UK Meteorological Office, Exeter, UK

Seshagiri Rao Kolusu

Leonard Konikow Hydrogeologist, Reston, VA, USA

Leonard F. Konikow

Department of Hydraulic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China

Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA

Mesfin Mekonnen

Institute of Physical Geography, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany

Hannes Müller Schmied

Senckenberg Leibniz Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany

School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, India

Abhijit Mukherjee

British Geological Survey, Lyell Centre, Edinburgh, UK

Alan MacDonald

Institute for Risk and Disaster Reduction, University College London, London, UK

Mohammad Shamsudduha

National Centre for Groundwater Research and Training (NCGRT), College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Craig T. Simmons

Department of Geography, University College London, London, UK

Richard G. Taylor

Water Cycle Innovation Ltd, Johannesburg, Gauten, South Africa

Karen G. Villholth

Environmental Sciences Initiative, Advanced Science Research Center at the CUNY Graduate Center, New York, NY, USA

Charles J. Vörösmarty

School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China

Chunmiao Zheng

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

B.R.S. conceptualized the review and coordinated input. S.F. reviewed many of the topics and developed some of the figures. A.R. analysed GRACE satellite data and M.S. reviewed this output. Q.G. provided input on water economics. E.J. reviewed impacts of land-use change. S.R.K. provided data on future precipitation changes. L.F.K. provided detailed information on surface water/groundwater interactions. M.M. provided data on water trade. C.J.V. provided input on green and grey solutions. All authors reviewed the paper and provided edits.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bridget R. Scanlon .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information.

Nature Reviews Earth & Environment thanks Helen Dahlke, Diana Allen, who co-reviewed with Aspen Anderson, and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information, supplementary tables , rights and permissions.

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Scanlon, B.R., Fakhreddine, S., Rateb, A. et al. Global water resources and the role of groundwater in a resilient water future. Nat Rev Earth Environ 4 , 87–101 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00378-6

Download citation

Accepted : 17 November 2022

Published : 31 January 2023

Issue Date : February 2023

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00378-6

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

This article is cited by

Severe magnitude of dental and skeletal fluorosis and its impact on society and environment in a part of manbhum-singhbhum plateau, india.

• Arijit Ghosh
• Soumyajit Patra
• Biswajit Bera

BMC Public Health (2024)

Rapid groundwater decline and some cases of recovery in aquifers globally

• Scott Jasechko
• Hansjörg Seybold
• James W. Kirchner

Nature (2024)

Majority of global river flow sustained by groundwater

• Xiaomang Liu
• Sujan Koirala

Nature Geoscience (2024)

Winter snow deficit was a harbinger of summer 2022 socio-hydrologic drought in the Po Basin, Italy

• Francesco Avanzi
• Francesca Munerol
• Luca Ferraris

Communications Earth & Environment (2024)

Moving from fit to fitness for governing water in the Anthropocene

• Michele-Lee Moore
• Lan Wang-Erlandsson
• Shuchi Vora

Nature Water (2024)

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here .

Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Water resource management: IWRM strategies for improved water management. A systematic review of case studies of East, West and Southern Africa

Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

* E-mail: [email protected]

Affiliations Soil, Crop, and Climate Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa, School of Engineering, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa, Varmac Consulting Engineers, Scottsville, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa

Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation Department of Civil & Structural Engineering, Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, Kakamega, Kenya

Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation Soil, Crop, and Climate Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa

Roles Writing – review & editing

Affiliation Department of Agriculture and Engineering Services, Irrigation Engineering Section, Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria

• Tinashe Lindel Dirwai, 
• Edwin Kimutai Kanda, 
• Aidan Senzanje, 
• Toyin Isiaka Busari

• Published: May 25, 2021
• https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236903
• Reader Comments

17 May 2024: Dirwai TL, Kanda EK, Senzanje A, Busari TI (2024) Correction: Water resource management: IWRM strategies for improved water management. A systematic review of case studies of East, West and Southern Africa. PLOS ONE 19(5): e0304228. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304228 View correction

The analytical study systematically reviewed the evidence about the IWRM strategy model. The study analysed the IWRM strategy, policy advances and practical implications it had, since inception on effective water management in East, West and Southern Africa.

The study adopted the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) and the scoping literature review approach. The study searched selected databases for peer-reviewed articles, books, and grey literature. DistillerSR software was used for article screening. A constructionist thematic analysis was employed to extract recurring themes amongst the regions.

The systematic literature review detailed the adoption, policy revisions and emerging policy trends and issues (or considerations) on IWRM in East, West and Southern Africa. Thematic analysis derived four cross-cutting themes that contributed to IWRM strategy implementation and adoption. The identified four themes were donor effect, water scarcity, transboundary water resources, and policy approach. The output further posited questions on the prospects, including whether IWRM has been a success or failure within the African water resource management fraternity.

Citation: Dirwai TL, Kanda EK, Senzanje A, Busari TI (2021) Water resource management: IWRM strategies for improved water management. A systematic review of case studies of East, West and Southern Africa. PLoS ONE 16(5): e0236903. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236903

Editor: Sergio Villamayor-Tomas, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, SPAIN

Received: July 12, 2020; Accepted: May 2, 2021; Published: May 25, 2021

Copyright: © 2021 Dirwai et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper.

Funding: This study was supported by the National Research Foundation (NRF) in the form of a grant awarded to TLD (131377) and VarMac Consulting Engineers in the form of a salary for TLD. The specific roles of the authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section. The funders had no additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have read the journal’s policy and have the following potential competing interests: TLD is a paid employee of VarMac Consulting Engineers. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. There are no patents, products in development or marketed products associated with this research to declare.

1 Introduction

Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) is a concept that is meant to foster effective water resource management. GWP [ 1 ] defined it as “the process which promotes the coordinated development and management of water, land and related resources, to maximise the resultant economic and social welfare equitably without compromising the sustainability of vital systems”. A holistic approach, in the form of the Dublin statement on Water and Sustainable Development (DSWSD), emerged and it became the backbone of IWRM principles.

According to Solanes and Gonzalez-Villarreal [ 2 ] the Dublin priciples are: “ (1) Freshwater is a finite and vulnerable resource , essential to sustain life , development and the environment; (2) Water development and management should be based on a participatory approach , involving users , planners and policy-makers at all levels , (3) Women play a central part in the provision , management , and safeguarding of water , and (4) Water has an economic value in all its competing uses , and should be recognised as an economic good .” The seamless conflation of the DSWSD and the Agenda 21 at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) in 1992 further strengthened the IWRM discourse and facilitated the policy approach of IWRM [ 3 , 4 ]. Since its inception the IWRM policy has been the holy grail of water resource management in Africa, Asia, and Europe to mention a few. For policy diffusion, countries were required to develop an IWRM policy blueprints for effective water use [ 5 ].

This review sought to unveil the innovative IWRM strategy approach by critically examining its genesis, implementation, adoption and the main drivers in in East, Southern and West Africa. Secondary to this, the study endeavoured to determine whether the IWRM implementation has been a success or failure. The choice of East, West and Southern Africa was influenced by the regional dynamics of Sub-Saharan Africa which have unique problems in water resources management and the hydropolitical diversity in this region. The isolated cases provide a holistic representation t the implementation dynamics of IWRM. In addition, sub-Sahara Africa was the laboratory for IWRM with Zimbabwe and South Africa being the early implementers [ 6 ]. Apart from the IWRM strategy being a social experiment in sub-Sahara, there exists a gap on an overarching review on the performance and aggregated outcomes of the IWRM adopters in the continent. The selection of the countries of interest was based on the authors geo-locations and their expert experiences with the IWRM strategy in their respective localities. The study sought to draw trends, similarities, and potential differences in the drivers involved in achieving the desired IWRM outcome.

IWRM strategy approach and implementation are ideally linked to individual country’s developmental policies [ 7 ]. Southern Africa (Zimbabwe and South Africa) is the biggest adopter of the water resource management strategy and produced differed uptake patterns [ 8 ]. In East Africa, Tanzania,Uganda and Kenya also adopted the IWRM strategy, whilst in West Africa, Burkina Faso latently adopted the IWRM strategy in 1992 [ 4 ] and in Ghana, customary and traditional water laws transformed into latent IWRM practices [ 9 ].

Various initiatives were put in place to aid the adoption of IWRM in sub-Sahara Africa. For example, Tanzania benefited from donor funds and World Bank programmes that sought to alleviate poverty and promote environmental flows. The World Bank radically upscaled and remodelled IWRM in Tanzania through the River Basin Management—Smallholder Irrigation Improvement Programme (RBM-SIIP) [ 10 ]. The government of Uganda’s efforts of liberalising the markets, opening democratic space and decentralising the country attracted donor funds that drove the IWRM strategy agenda. The long-standing engagement between Uganda and the Nordic Fresh Water initiative helped in the diffusion of IWRM strategy in the country. Finally, in West Africa, Burkina Faso and Ghana made significant strides in operationalising the IWRM strategy by adopting the West Africa Water Resources Policy (WAWRP). A massive sense of agency coupled with deliberate government efforts drove the adoption status of Burkina Faso.

Total policy diffusion can be achieved when the practice or idea has supporting enablers. Innovation is key in developing plocies that altersocietal orthodox policy paths that fuel hindrance and consequently in-effective water governance [ 11 ]. Acknowledging the political nature of water (water governance and transboundary catchments issues) is the motivation to legislate water-driven and people-driven innovative policy [ 12 ]. Water policy reform should acknowledge the differing interests’ groups of the water users and its multi-utility nature; thus, diffusion channels should be tailored accordingly, avoiding the ‘one size fits all’ fallacy. IWRM as an innovative strategy approach diffused from the global stage to Africa and each regional block adopted the approach at different times under different circumstances.

The rest of this paper is outlined as follows; section 2 presents the conceptual framework adopted and the subsequent methodology. Section 3 presents the results and discussion. The discussion is structured around innovation driver in each respective region. Thereafter, sub-section 3.4 presents the prospect of IWRM in the East, West and Southern Africa regions. Lastly, the paper presents the conclusion.

2 Methodology

2.1 conceptual framework and methodology.

The analytical framework applied in the study is based on the water innovation frames by the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA) [ 13 ]. The UNDESA [ 13 ], classified water frames into three distinct categories namely water management strategies (e.g., IWRM), water infrastructure and water services. The former partly involves IWRM strategies and the latter encompasses economic water usage such as agriculture, energy production and industrial applications [ 12 ].

The literature review identified research gaps that informed the employed search strategy. The literature that qualified for inclusion was thoroughly analysed and discussed. The aggregated outcomes were used for excerpt extraction in the thematic analysis.

2.2 Literature handling

The study performed a systematic review as guided by the Arksey and O’Malley [ 14 ] approach. The approach details methods on how to scope, gather, screen and report literature. The study further employed a constructionist thematic analysis to extract common recurring themes amongst the regions.

2.2.1 Eligibility criteria.

Eligibility criteria followed an adapted SPICE (Setting, Perspective, Intervention, Comparison and Evaluation) structure ( Table 1 ). The SPICE structure informed the study’s search strategy ( Table 2 ) and the subsequent formulation of the inclusion-exclusion criteria ( Table 3 ). The evidence search was conducted from the following databases: Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, UKZN-EFWE, CABI, JSTOR, African Journals Online (AJOL), Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), J-Gate, SciELO and WorldCat for peer-reviewed articles, books, and grey literature. The study did not emphasize publication date as recommended by Moffa, Cronk [ 15 ]. Databases selection was based on their comprehensive and over-arching nature in terms of information archiving. It is worth mentioning that the search strategy was continuously revised by trial and error until the databases yielded the maximum number of articles for screening.

• PPT PowerPoint slide
• PNG larger image
• TIFF original image

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236903.t001

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236903.t002

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236903.t003

2.2.2 Search strategy.

The search strategy or query execution [ 16 ] utilised Boolean operators ( OR & AND ). The dynamic nature of the search strategy required the authors to change the search terms and strategy, for example, if digital databases did not yield the expected search items the study would manually search for information sources. The search queries included a string of search terms summarised in Table 2 .

2.2.3 Selection process.

DistillerSR © software was used for article screening. Online data capturing forms were created in the DistillerSR © software and two authors performed the article scoring process that eventully led to article screening. The screening was based on the article title, abstract and locality. The study employed a two-phase screening process [ 17 ], the first phase screened according to title and the second phase screened according to abstract and keywords. During the screening process, studies that the matched information in the left column of Table 3 we included in the literature review syntheses, whilst those that matched the exclusion list were discarded.

2.3 Thematic analysis

The review also adopted the thematic analysis approach by Braun and Clarke [ 18 ] to extract, code, and select candidate converging themes for the systematic review. The selected lieterature was subjected to qualitative analysis to capture recurring themes amongst the selected regions (East, West and Southern Africa). Data extracts from the respective regional analysis were formulated into theoretical themes. Thereafter, the extracted data was coded according to the extracted patterns from the information source to constitute a theme. It is worth mentioning that the authors used their discretion to extract and code for themes.

3 Results and discussion

Data charting comprised of the PRISMA flow-chart ( Fig 1 ). The study utilised 80 out of 183 records (n = 37, 46%) for East Africa, (n = 37, 46%) for Southern Africa, and (n = 6, 8%) for West Africa.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236903.g001

3.1 Case studies

The introduction of IWRM in the East African region was initiated in 1998 by the water ministers in the Nile basin states due to the need for addressing the concerns raised by the riparian states. These water sector reforms revolved around the Dublin principles initiated by the UN in 1992 [ 20 ]. In 1999, Kenya developed the national water policy and the enabling legislation, the Water Act 2002 was enacted [ 21 ]. The Act was replaced by the Water Act 2016 which established the Water Resources Authority (WRA) as the body mandated to manage water resources in line with the IWRM principles and Water Resource Users Association (WRUA) as the lowest (local) level of water management [ 22 ].

Similarly, Uganda developed the national water policy in 1999 to manage, and develop the available water resources in an integrated and sustainable manner [ 23 ]. The National Water Policy further provides for the promotion of water supply for modernized agriculture [ 24 ]. Tanzania’s water policy of 2002 espouses IWRM principles, and its implementation is based on a raft of legal, economic, administrative, technical, regulatory and participatory instruments [ 25 ]. The National Irrigation Policy (NIP), 2010 and the National Irrigation Act, 2013 provides the legal basis for the involvement of different actors on a private-public partnership basis [ 26 ].

West Africa possesses an unregistered IWRM strategy that is espoused in the West Africa Water Resources Policy (WAWRP) of 2008. The WAWRP is founded on the following legal principles; (a) “promote, coordinate and ensure the implementation of a regional water resource policy in West Africa, in accordance with the mission and policies of Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS)and (b) “harmonization and coordination of national policies and the promotion of programmes, projects and activities, especially in the field of agriculture and natural resources”. The founding legal basis resonates with the Dublin principles.

The WAWRP design actors were ECOWAS, Union Economique et Monétaire Ouest Africaine (UEMOA), and Comité Permanent Inter-État de Llutte Contre la Sécheresse au Sahel (CILSS). CILSS is the technical arm of ECOWAS and UEMOA. The institutional collaboration was driven by the fact that West Africa needed a sound water policy for improved regional integration and maximised economic gains. ECOWAS established the Water Resources Coordination Centre (WRCC) to (a) oversee and monitor the region’s water resources and management activities and (b) to act as an executive organ of the Permanent Framework for Coordination and Monitoring (PFCM) of IRWM [ 27 ].

The inception and triggers of IWRM in West Africa can be traced back to the General Act of Berlin in 1885 which, among other things, dictated water resources use of the Congo and Niger rivers [ 28 ]. A multiplicity of agreements around shared watercourses in West Africa led to the realisation of the IWRM policy approach. For example, the Senegal River Basin (SRB) Development Mission facilitated collaboration between Senegal and Mauritania in managing the SRB. Another noteworthy agreement was Ruling C/REG.9/7/97, a regional plan to fight floating plants in the ECOWAS countries [ 28 ]. GWP (2003) categorised the West African countries according to the level of adoption into three distinct groups namely; (a) Group A comprised of countries with the capacity to develop and adopt the IWRM approach (Burkina Faso and Ghana), (b) Group B comprised of countries needing “light support” to unroll the IWRM plan (Benin, Mali, Nigeria, and Togo), and (3) Group C comprised of laggards which needed significant support to establish an IWRM plan (Cape Verde, Ivory Coast, Gambia, Guinea, Guinea Bissau, Liberia, Mauritania, Niger, Senegal and Sierra Leone).

Southern African Development Community (SADC) regional bloc has over 15 shared transboundary river basins (For detailed basin and catchment arrangement in SADC see [ 29 ]). SADC member states established the Protocol on Shared Water Systems (PSWS) which meant to encourage sustainable water resources utilisation and management. The PSWS was perceived to strengthen regional integration [ 30 ]. The regional bloc formulated the Regional Strategic Action Plans (RSAPs) that sought to promote an integrated water resources development plan. The action initiative mimicked IWRM principles and the shared water resources initiatives acted as a catalyst for the genesis of IWRM in Southern Africa [ 31 ]. SADC houses the Waternet and the GWP-SA research and innovation hubs upon which SADC’s IWRM adoption was anchored on. Besides the availability of trained water experts in the region who were willing to experiment with the IWRM policy approach, water scarcity fuelled by climate change prompted the region’s adoption of the IWRM policy approach at the local level.

3.2 Diffusion drivers of IWRM in East, West and Southern Africa

3.2.1 water scarcity..

The adoption of IWRM in East Africa was necessitated by water scarcity which is experienced by the countries in the region, which formed the need for adoption of prudent water resources management strategies as envisaged under the Dublin principles which was championed indirectly, according to Allouche [ 5 ], by the World Bank. Specifically, the need to give incentives and disincentives in water use sectors to encourage water conservation.

Kenya is a water-scarce country with per capita water availability of 586 m 3 in 2010 and projected to 393 m 3 in 2030 [ 32 ]. Uganda is endowed with water resources, however, it is projected that the country will be water-stressed by 2020 which could be compounded by climate variability and change, rapid urbanization, economic and population growth [ 33 ].

Using water scarcity was in essence coercing countries to adopt the IWRM principles with the irrigation sector, the contributor of the largest proportion of water withdrawals, becoming the major culprit [ 5 ]. The researchers opine that the effects of water scarcity in the region can be countered by adopting IWRM strategy, but adaptively to suit the local context and thus, persuasive rather than coercive, is the appropriate term. Indeed, as put forward by Van der Zaag [ 34 ], IWRM is not an option but it is a necessity and therefore, countries need to align their water policies and practices in line with it.

West African climatic conditions pose a threat on the utilisation of the limited water resource. Water resource utilisation is marred by erratic rainfalls and primarily a lack of water resources management know-how [ 27 ]. Countries in the Sahelian regions are characterised by semi-arid climatic conditions. Thus, dry climatic conditions account as an IWRM strategy driver to ensure maximised water use efficiency. Although the region acknowledges the need for adopting the IWRM strategy, they have varied adoption statuses (GWP, 2003).

Southern African countries also face serious water scarcity problems. Rainfall in South Africa is low and unevenly distributed with about 9% translating to useful runoff making the country one of the most water scarce countries in the world [ 35 ]. Generally, SADC countries experience water scarcity resulting in conflicts due to increasing pressure on the fresh water resources [ 36 ]. Thus, the researched opine that water scarcity pushed the region to adopt the IWRM strategy inorder to mitigate the looming effects of climate change on surface water availainility.

3.2.2 Trans-boundary water resources.

Water resources flow downstream indiscriminately across villages, locations, regions and nations/states and therefore necessitates co-operation. The upstream and downstream relationships among communities, people and countries created by the water is asymmetrical in that the actions upstream tend to affect the downstream riparian and not the other way round [ 34 ]. In East Africa, the Nile Basin Initiative (NBI) and the Lake Victoria Basin Commission (LVBC) plays a critical component in promoting the IWRM at regional level [ 20 ].

The Nile River system is the single largest factor driving the IWRM in the region. Lake Victoria, the source of the Nile River is shared by the three East African states of Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania. Irrigation schemes in Sudan and Egypt rely exclusively on the waters of River Nile and are therefore apprehensive of the actions of upstream states notably Ethiopia, Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Rwanda and Burundi. The source of contention is the asymmetrical water needs and allocation which was enshrined in the Sudan–Egypt treaty of 1959 [ 37 ]. All the riparian countries in the Nile basin have agricultural-based economies and thus irrigation is the cornerstone of food security [ 38 ]. Therefore, there was the need for the establishment of basin-wide co-operation which led to the formation of NBI in 1999 with a vision to achieve sustainable socio-economic development through the equitable utilisation of the Nile water resources [ 39 ].

The Mara River is another trans-boundary river which is shared between Tanzania and Kenya and the basin forms the habitat for the Maasai Mara National Reserve and Serengeti National Park in Kenya and Tanzania, respectively, which is prominent for the annual wildlife migration. Kenya has 65% of the upper part of the basin, any development on the upstream, such as hydropower or water diversion, will reduce the water quantities and therefore affect the Serengeti ecosystem and the livelihoods of people in Tanzania [ 40 ]. The LVBC, under the East African Community, developed the Mara River Basin-wide—Water Allocation Plan (MRB-WAP) to help in water demand management and protection of the Mara ecosystem [ 41 ]. The mandate of the LVBC is to implement IWRM in Lake Victoria Basin riparian countries [ 20 ].

Other shared water basins include the Malakisi-Malaba-Sio River basin shared between Uganda and Kenya and the Kagera River basin traversing Burundi, Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda. The two river basins form part of the Upper Nile system and are governed through the LVBC and the NBI.

The universal transboundary nature of water creates dynamics that warrant cooperation for improved water use. West Africa has 25 transboundary watercourses and only 6 are under agreed management and regulation. The situation is compounded by the fact that 20 watercourses lack strategic river-basin management instruments [ 28 ]. Unregistered rules and the asymmetrical variations associated with watercourses warranted the introduction of the IWRM principle to set equitable water sharing protocols and promote environmental flows (e-flows). The various acts signed represent an evolutionary treaty development that combines th efforts of riparian states to better manage the shared water resources (for detailed basin configuration in West Africa see [ 42 ]). Hence, adoption of the IWRM strategy driven WAWRP of 2008 ensured the coordinanted and harmonised regional water usage mechanisms.

The SADC region has 13 major transboundary river basins which calls for development of agreements on how to handle the shared water resources with the contraints of varying levels of economic development and priorities among the member states. The multi-lateral and bi-lateral agreeements on shared water resources in the SADC is hampered by the hydropolitics where economic power dynamics favour South Africa as in the case of the Orange-Senqu basin [ 43 ].

3.2.3 Donor influence.

The World Bank has been pushing for IWRM principles in the East Africa through the NBI and by pressurising Egypt to agree to co-operate with the upstream riparian countries in the Nile basin [ 38 ]. In the early 1990s, the World Bank had aligned its funding policies to include sustainable water resources management [ 44 ].

In Tanzania, Norway, through NORAD, played a key role in implementing IWRM by promoting water projects including hydropower schemes [ 45 ]. Indeed the transformation of the agricultural sector in Tanzania through Kilimo Kwanza policy of 2009 which emphasised on the commercialization of agriculture including irrigation was driven by foreign donors such as the USAID and UK’s DFID [ 26 ].

In Uganda, however, the reforms in the water sector were initiated devoid of external influence [ 46 ]. However, this assertion is countered by Allouche [ 5 ] who pointed that Uganda had become a ‘darling’ of the donor countries in the early 1990s and that DANIDA helped to develop the Master Water Plan and the country was keen to show a willingness to develop policy instruments favourable to the donor. East African countries are developing economies and therefore most of their development plans are supported by external agencies, which to some extent come with subtle ‘conditions’ such as free-market economies. In fact imposition of tariffs and other economic instruments used to implement IWRM in water supply and irrigation is a market-based approach which was favoured by the World Bank and other development agencies.

Donor aid cannot be downplayed in pushing for IWRM diffusion in low-income aid-dependent countries of West Africa. GoBF [ 47 ] reported that from the period 1996–2001, more than 80% of water-related projects were donor funded. Cherlet and Venot [ 48 ] also found that almost 90% of the water investments in Mali were funded outside the government apparatus. It can, therefore, be argued that donor-aid plays a pivotal and central role in diffusing policy and innovation in aid-depended countries because of the incentive nature it provides for the low-income countries in the sub-Sahara region.

Southern Africa’s experience with western donors including the World Bank in terms of IWRM adoption favoured the urban areas and neglected rural areas (see [ 8 ]). The National Water Act drafting process in South africa was a multi-stakeholder and intersectoral activity that brought in international consultancies. Notable IWRM drivers were Department of International Development—UK (DFID), Danish Danida, and Deustsche Gesellschaft fur Zusammernarbeit (GIZ). The DFID was instrumental in water reform allocation law whilst the GIZ and Danida were active in experimental work in the catchments [ 3 ]. On the contrary, in Zimbabwe, a lack of access to international funding and fleeting donor aid exacerbated the policy uptake as such the anticipated implementation, operationalisation and continuous feedback mechanism for policy revision and administering process was never realised.

3.2.4 Government intervention and pro-active citizenry.

This was predomint in West Africa. For example the Burkinabe government exhibited political goodwill such that in 1995 the government brought together two separate ministries into one ministry of Environment and Water thus enabling coherent policy formulation and giving the ministry one voice to speak on water matters. The dynamic innovation arena (where policy players interact) allows continuous policy revision and redesign thus water policy reform diffusion, and policy frameworks are in a perpetual state of shifting. For example, in the 1990s the Burkinabe government was engaged in several water-related projects and was continuously experimenting with local governance and privatization (from donors) [ 1 ]. This policy shift according to Gupta [ 49 ] qualifies as an innovation driver.

Burkina Faso and Mali’s adoption story is accentuated by heightened agency, the individual enthusiasm on influencing the outcome facilitated policy diffusion and can be argued to be a potential innovation diffusion driver for the IWRM policy approach in the region. The individual policy diffusion fuelled by an enthusiastic citizenry was a sure method that effectively diffused awareness around the IWRM innovation and acted as a driver of the IWRM practices in the region. Individual strategies were honed in smallholder farming institutions to diffuse the IWRM practice and drawing from the Sabatier and Jenkins-Smith [ 50 ] advocacy coalition theory, having individuals with common agendas promoted the transfer and diffusion of water reforms in parts of West Africa.

3.2.5 Legal, political and institutional incoherence.

This was a major factor which dictated the pace of IWRM implementation in Southern Africa. For example, the Fast Track Land Reform (FTLR) programme in Zimbabwe disaggregated the large-scale commercial farms and created smallholder farming [ 51 ], consequently influencing and dictating IWRM policy path. The FTLR programme had a negative impact on the spread and uptake of IWRM. A series of poor economic performance and poor policy design compounded the limited diffusion and the adoption of IWRM practices at local levels in Zimbabwe. The FTLR programme compounded the innovation diffusion process as the Zimbabwe National Water Authority (ZINWA) lost account of who harvested how much at the newly created smallholder farms. Thus, water access imbalance ensured, and ecological sustainability was compromised.

Policy incoherence was a major factor in poor IWRM diffusion and adoption, for example, the government did not synchronise the land and water reforms thus it meant at any given point in time there was a budget for one reform agenda [ 8 ] and the land reform agenda would take precedence because of political rent-seeking. IWRM in its nature couples growth to the coordinated consumption of finite resources, hence the circular approach cannot be easily realised because finte resources are at the core of the strategy’s existence.

South Africa’s transition from Integrated Catchment Management (ICM) strategies to the IWRM strategy, hindered the operationalisation and diffusion of the IWRM strategy [ 52 ]. Despite acknowledging the “integration”, researchers argued that the word lacked a clear-cut definition thus failing to establish a common ground for water’s multi-purpose use [ 53 ]. For maximised adoption of a practice, incremental innovation is required, which was Danida’s agenda in the quest to drive IWRM in South Africa. According to Wehn and Montalvo [ 54 ] incremental innovation “is characterised by marginal changes and occurs in mature circumstances”,

Land reform in South Africa is characterised by (a) redistribution which seeks to transfer land from the white minority on a willing buyer willing seller basis, (b) restitution which rights the discriminatory 1913 land laws that saw natives evicted from their ancestral land, and (c) land tenure that provides tenure to the occupants of the homelands. This new pattern created a new breed of smallholder farmers that are, more often than not, excluded from diffusion and water governance channels [ 55 ]. In addition, researchers argue that a farm once owned by one white farmer is owned by multiple landowners with different cultural backgrounds and, more often than not, IWRM strategy is met with resistance [ 56 ]. Another challenge posed by multi-cultural water users is the interpretation and translation of innovations.

To foster water as an economic good aspect of IWRM the licensing system was enacted in South Africa. The phenomenon was described by van Koppen (2012) as paper water precedes water, thus the disadvantaged black smallholder farmers could not afford paper water which consequently limits access to water. The licensing system can be interpreted as stifling the smallholder sector and hence negative attitudes develop and hinder effective policy diffusion. Another issue that negatively impacted adoption was that issuing a license was subject to farmers possessing storage facilities. The smallholder farmers lack resources hence the requirement for obtaining a license excluded the small players in favour of the large-scale commercial farmers. This consequently maintains the historically skewed status-quo, where “big players” keep winning. Van Koppen [ 57 ] and Denby, Movik [ 58 ] argue the shift from local water rights system to state-based water system have created bottlenecks making it hard for smallholder farmers to obtain “paper water” and subsequently “wet water”. The state-based system is characterised by bureaucracies and local norms are in perpetual change, hence denying the IWRM innovation policy approach stability efficiency.

A lack of political will and pragmatism amplified the poor adoption and operationalisation of IWRM, a poorly performing economy and fleeing donor agencies resulted in less funding for water-related project. Political shenanigans created an imbalance that resulted in two forms of water i.e., water as an economic good vs. water as a social good [ 59 ]. Manzungu [ 60 ] argued post-colonial Zimbabwe continuously failed to develop a peoples-oriented water reform policy. In a bid to correct historical wrongs by availing subsidised water to the vulnerable and support the new social order, the initiative goes against the neo-liberalism approach that defines the “water as an economic good” [ 61 ] which is a founding principle of IWRM.

Water redistribution in South Africa has been fraught with political and technical issues, for example, the Water Allocation Reform of 2003 failed to reconcile the apartheid disparity hence the equity component of IWRM was compromised. IWRM suffered another setback caused by the governing party when they introduced radical innovations that sought to shift from the socialist to neoliberal water resource use approach. The radical innovation through the government benefited the large-scale commercial farmers at the expense of the black smallholder farming community [ 53 ].

3.3 Systematic comparison of findings on East, West and Southern Africa

Data extracts from the respective regional analysis were formulated into theoretical candidate themes. The thematic analysis extracted recurring themes common to all the three regions. An independent reviwer performed the subjective thematic analysis and the authors performed the review on the blind thematic analysis outcome. The analysis performed a data extraction exercise and formulated codes ( Fig 2 ). Themes were then generated from the coded data extracts to create a thematic map. It is worth mentioning that the data extracts were phrases/statement from with in the literature review.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236903.g002

3.3.1 Donor aid and policy approach.

Donor activity invariably influenced the policy path that individual countries took. The three regions had significant support from donors to drive the IWRM strategy. Zimbabwe experienced a different fate. The political climate caused an exodus of donor support from the nation, which consequently caused a laggard. The absence of donor support was at the backdrop of the two formulated water acts namely National Water Act [ 62 ] and the Zimbabwe National Water Authority Act of 1998 [ 63 ], which were meant to promote equitable water provision amongst the population. This highlights the latent adoption of IWRM strategy. The 2008/2009 cholera outbreak raised alarm and facilitated the return of donor activity in Zimbabwe’s water sector. The availability of donor support motivated the redrafting of a water clause in the 2013 constitution that espoused the IWRM strategy to water management [ 64 ].

Whilst Mehta, Alba [ 64 ] argue that South Africa enjoyed minimal donor support it cannot be downplayed how much donor influence impacted the IWRM strategy adoption. For instance, the Water Allocation Reform (WAR) was drafted with the aid of the UK Department of International Development. The WAR fundamentals are informed by IWRM principles. The economic structural programmes spearheaded by The World Bank and the IMF were active in facilitating the diffusion of the IWRM strategy in Kenya and Uganda. Uganda made strides because of a long-standing relationship with donor nations. The Uganda—donor relationship dates back to early 1990 where Uganda was elected to be the NBI secretariat, this in itself evidence of commitment to water policy reform [ 4 , 65 ]. Donor aid acts as an incentive and augments the low African goverments’ budgets, as such proper accountability and usage of the funds ensures that more funds come in for projected water related projects.

3.3.2 Transboundary water resources.

The Nile River system is the single largest factor driving the IWRM in the region since it is shared across several upstream and downetream nations. Irrigation schemes in Sudan and Egypt rely exclusively on the waters of River Nile and are therefore apprehensive of the actions of upstream states notably Ethiopia, Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Rwanda and Burundi. The source of contention is the asymmetrical water needs and allocation which was enshrined in the Sudan–Egypt treaty of 1959 [ 37 ]. Over time, the upstream countried demanded equitable share of the Nile waters and this led to the establishment of NBI. In Eastern Africa, the Nile Basin Initiative (NBI) and the Lake Victoria Basin Commission (LVBC) plays a critical component in promoting the IWRM at regional level [ 20 ]. The LVBC is deeply intertwined with the East African Community (EAC) and thus has more political clout to implement policies regarding utilization of the Lake Victoria waters [ 66 ]. This, therefore, implies that for NBI to succeed, it must have a mandate and political goodwill from the member countries.

The conflicts around the utilization of the Nile water resources persists due to the treaty of 1959 which led to the signing of Cooperative Framework Agreement (CFA) by a number of the Nile basin countries, with the notable exceptions of Egypt, Sudan and South Sudan [ 67 ]. The CFA was signed between 2010 and 2011 and establishes the principle that each Nile Basin state has the right to use, within its territory, the waters of the Nile River Basin, and lays down some factors for determining equitable and reasonable utilization such as the contribution of each state to the Nile waters and the proportion of the drainage area [ 68 ]. The construction of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam has been a source of concern and conflict among the three riparian countries of Ethiopia, Sudan and Egypt [ 67 ]. The asymmetrical power relations (Egypt is the biggest economy) in the Nile Basin is a big hindrance to the co-operation among the riparian countries [ 69 ] and thus a threat to IWRM implementation in the shared watercourse. While Ethiopia is using its geographical power to negotiate for an equitable share in the Nile water resources, Egypt is utilizing both materials, bargaining and idealistic power to dominate the hydro politics in the region and thus the former can only succeed if it reinforces its geographical power with material power [ 70 ].

Therefore, IWRM implementation at the multi-national stage is complex but necessary to forestall regional conflicts and war. The necessity of co-operation rather than conflict in the Nile Basin is paramount due to the water availability constraints which is experienced by most countries in the region. The transboundary IWRM revolves around water-food- energy consensus where the needs of the riparian countries are sometimes contrasting, for example, Egypt and Sudan require the Nile waters for irrigation to feed their increasing population while Ethiopia requires the Nile waters for power generation to stimulate her economy. The upstream riparian States could use their bargaining power to foster co-operation and possibly force the hegemonic downstream riparian States into the equitable and sustainable use of Nile waters [ 71 ].

The SADC region has 13 major transboundary river basins (excluding the Nile and Congo) of Orange, Limpopo, Incomati, Okavango, Cunene, Cuvelai, Maputo, Buzi, Pungue, Save-Runde, Umbeluzi, Rovuma and Zambezi [ 72 ]. The Revised Protocol on Shared Watercourses was instrumental for managing transboundary water resources in the SADC. The overall aim of the Protocol was to foster co-operation for judicious, sustainable and coordinated management, the protection and utilization of shared water resources [ 73 ].

Ashton and Turton [ 74 ] argue that the transboundary water issues in Southern Africa revolved around the key roles played by pivotal States and impacted States and their corresponding pivotal basins and impacted basins. In this case, pivotal States are riparian states with a high level of economic development (Botswana, Namibia, South Africa, and Zimbabwe) and a high degree of reliance on shared river basins for strategic sources of water supply while impacted States are riparian states (Angola, Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique, Swaziland, Tanzania, and Zambia) that have a critical need for access to water from an international river basin that they share with a pivotal state, but appear to be unable to negotiate what they consider to be an equitable allocation of water and therefore, their future development dreams are impeded by the asymmetrical power dynamics with the pivotal states. Pivotal Basins (Orange, Incomati, and Limpopo) are international river basins that face closure but are also strategically important to anyone (or all) of the pivotal states by virtue of the range and magnitude of economic activity that they support. Impacted basins (Cunene, Maputo, Okavango, Cuvelai, Pungué, Save-Runde, and Zambezi) are those international river basins that are not yet approaching a point of closure, and which are strategically important for at least one of the riparian states with at least one pivotal State.

The transboundary co-operation under IWRM in Southern Africa is driven mainly by water scarcity which is predominant in most of the SADC countries which may imply the use of inter-basin transfers schemes [ 74 ]. Further, most of the water used for agriculture, industry and domestic are found within the international river basins [ 75 ] which calls for collaborative water management strategies. The tricky feature hindering the IWRM is the fact that States are reluctant to transfer power to River Basin Commissions [ 76 ]. Indeed most of the River Basin Organizations (RBO) in Southern region such as the Zambezi Commission, the Okavango River Basin Commission, and the Orange-Sengu River Basin Commission have loose links with SADC and therefore lack the political clout to implement the policies governing the shared water resources [ 66 ]. Power asymmetry, like in Eastern Africa, is also a bottleneck in achieving equitable sharing of water resources as illustrated by the water transfer scheme involving Lesotho and South Africa [ 77 ]. The hydro-hegemonic South Africa is exercising control over any negotiations and agreements in the Orange-Senqu basin [ 43 ]. Limited data sharing among the riparian States is another challenge which affects water management in transboundary river basins e.g. in the Orange-Senqu basin [ 78 ].

West Africa has 25 transboundary watercourses and only 6 are under agreed management and regulation. The situation is compounded by the fact that 20 watercourses lack strategic river-basin management instruments [ 28 ]. Unregistered rules and the asymmetrical variations associated with watercourses warrant the introduction of the IWRM principle to set equitable water sharing protocols and promote environmental flows (e-flows). The various acts signed represent an evolutionary treaty development that combines the efforts of riparian states to better manage the shared water resources. It is important to note that evolutionary treaties are incremental innovation. Water Resources Coordination Centre (WRCC) was established in 2004 to implement an integrated water resource management in West Africa and to ensure regional coordination of water resource related policies and activities [ 79 ].

The Niger River basin covers 9 Countries of Benin, Burkina, Cameroon, Chad, Côte d’Ivoire, Guinea, Mali, Niger and Nigeria. The Niger River Basin Authority (NBA) was established to promote co-operation among the member countries and to ensure basin-wide integrated development in all fields through the development of its resources, notably in the fields of energy, water resources, agriculture, livestock, forestry exploitation, transport and communication and industry [ 80 ]. The Shared Vision and Sustainable Development Action Programme (SDAP) was developed to enhance co-operation and sharing benefits from the resources of River Niger [ 81 ]. The Niger Basin Water Charter together with the SDAP are key instruments which set out a general approach to basin development, an approach negotiated and accepted not only by all member states but also by other actors who utilize the basin resources [ 82 ].

The main agreement governing the transboundary water resource in River Senegal Basin is the Senegal River Development Organization, OMVS (Organisation pour la mise en valeur du fleuve Sénégal) with its core principle being the equitably shared benefits of the resources of the basin [ 82 ]. The IWRM in the Senegal River Basin is hampered by weak institutional structures and lack of protocol on how shared waters among the States as well as conflicting national and regional interests [ 83 , 84 ]. The Senegal River Basin, being situated in the Sudan-Sahelian region, is faced by the threat of climate change which affects water availability [ 84 ] The Senegal River Basin States have high risks of political instability.

3.4 Prospects of IWRM Africa

The countries in the three regions are at different stages of implementation ( Table 4 ). In East Africa, Uganda and Kenya are at medium-high level while Tanzania is medium-low. Majority of the countries in the Southern Africa region are at medium low. Comoros Islands is the only country at low level of implementation in the region. West African countries are evenly spread between low, medium-low and medium-high levels of implementation. Generally, East Africa is ranked as medium-high level with average score of 54% while Southern Africa and West Africa are ranked as medium low-level at 46% and 42% respectively. However if you include, medium low countries of Rwanda, Burundi, Ethiopia and South Sudan and the low-level Somalia, then East Africa’s score drops to 39% (medium-low).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236903.t004

The implementation of IWRM in the continent, and more so the inter dependent and multi purpose water use sectors, will continue to evolve amid implementation challenges. The dynamics of water policies, increased competition for finite water resources from rapid urbanization, industrialization and population growth will continue to shape IWRM practices in the region. Trans-boundary water resources management will possibly take centre stage as East African countries move towards full integration and political federation as envisaged in the four pillars of the EAC treaty. Decision support tools such as the Water—Energy—Food (WEF) nexus appraoch will be very relevant in the trans-boundary water resources such as the Nile system, Mara and Kagera river basins. The approach can potentially ameliorate the after effects of the devolved governance system in Kenya that consequently created a multiplicity of transboundary sectors.

Adoption of the IWRM policy in West Africa is fraught with many challenges. For example, despite having significant water resources, the lack of a collective effort by the governments to train water experts at national level presents a challenge for adoption. Unavailability of trained water experts (who in any case are diffusion media) results in a lack of diffusion channels that facilitate policy interpretation, translation and its subsequent implementation. Helio and Van Ingen [ 27 ] pointed out how political instability possesses a threat to current and future implantation initiatives. The future collaboration projects and objective outlined by ECOWAS, CILSS, and UEMO highlight a major effort to bring the region to speed with the IWRM policy approach. The WAWRP objectives can potentially set up the region on an effective IWRM trajectory which can be mimicked and upscaled in other regions. Positives drawn from the region are the deliberate institutional collaborations. Burkina Faso and Mali have the potential to operationalise and facilitate policy diffusion to other neighbouring states. Donor driven reform is essential and national ownership is critical in ensuring the water reform policies and innovation diffusion processes are implemented at the national level.

The IWRM policy approach and practice in South Africa was government-driven whereas in Zimbabwe external donors were the main vehicles for diffusion. For both countries, the water and land reform agenda has a multiplicity of overlapping functionaries; however, they are managed by separate government departments. The silo system at national level prevents effective innovation diffusion and distorts policy interpretation and the subsequent dissemination at the local level.i.

Water affairs are politicised and often, the water reform policy fails to balance the Dublin’s principles which form the backbone of the IWRM innovation policy approach. Failure by national governments to address unequal water access created by former segregationist policies is perpetuated by the lack of balance between creating a new social order and recognising the “water as an economic good” principle.

4 Conclusion

Africa as a laboratory of IWRM produced varied aggregated outcomes. The outcomes were directly linked to various national socio-economic development agendas; thus, the IWRM policy took a multiplicity of paths. In East Africa, Kenya is still recovering from the devolved system of government to the County system which created new transboundary sectors with the country. Water scarcity, trans-boundary water resource and donor aid played a critical role in driving the IWRM policy approach in the three regions. Southern Africa’s IWRM experience has been fraught with policy clashes between the water and land reforms. Similar to Africa, the transboundary issue in Europe and Asia and the subsequent management is a major buy-in for formulating water resources strategies that are people centric and ecologically friendly. Global water scarcity created fertile grounds for IWRM adoption in Asia, specifically India. Thus, we postulate that some of the drivers that influenced the uptake and diffusion in Africa are not only unique to the continent.

For the future, IWRM policy approach can be implemented in Africa and the continent has the potential to implement and adopt the practice. Endowed with a significant number of water bodies, Africa must adopt a blend of IWRM strategy and the water energy food nexus (WEF) for maximising regional cooperation and subsequent economic gains. WEF nexus will help combat a singular or silo approach to natural resources management. WEF nexus and IWRM is a fertile area for future research as it brings a deeper understanding of the trade-offs and synergies exsisting in the water sector across and within regions. In addition, the WEF nexus approach can potentially facilitate a shift to a circular approach that decouples over dependence on one finte resource for development.

Supporting information

S1 checklist..

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236903.s001

S1 Table. Data extracts with the applied codes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236903.s002

• 1. GWP, Capitalizing the development process of the Action Plan for IWRM and its implementation in Burkina Faso . 2009, Global Water Patnership: Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
• 2. Solanes M. and Gonzalez-Villarreal F., The Dublin principles for water as reflected in a comparative assessment of institutional and legal arrangements for integrated water resources management, ed. G.W.P.T.A.C. (TAC). 1999, Stockholm, Sweden.: Global Water Partnership.
• 3. Mehta L., et al., Flows and Practices : The Politics of Integrated Water Resources Management in Eastern and Southern Africa , Metha L., Derman B., and Manzungu E., Editors. 2017, Weaver Press: Harare, Zimbabwe.
• View Article
• Google Scholar
• 13. UNDESA, International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities Revision 4 . 2008, United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs: New York, USA.
• PubMed/NCBI
• 20. GWP, Integrated water resources management in Eastern Africa : Coping with ’complex’ hydrology 2015, Global Water Partnership: Stockholm, Sweden.
• 21. GOK, The Water Act , 2002 . 2002, Government Printer Nairobi, Kenya.
• 22. GOK, The Water Act , 2016 . 2016, Government Printer: Nairobi, Kenya.
• 23. MWLE, A National Water Policy 1999 , Ministry of Water, Lands and Environment Kampala, Uganda.
• 25. MWLD, National Water Policy . 2002, Ministry of Water and Livestock Development: Dodoma, The United Republic of Tanzania.
• 27. Helio J. and Van Ingen N., in West Africa Water Resources Policy (WAWRP) . 2008, Partnership for Environmental Governance in West Africa—PAGE.: Ouagadougou. Burkina Faso.
• 29. Senzanje A., Agricultural Water Management Interventions (Awmi) for Sustainable Agricultural Intensification (SAI) in the Chinyanja Triangle Area of Malawi , Mozambique and Zambia . 2016, IWMI: Pretoria, South Africa.
• 30. Granit J., Swedish experiences from transboundary water resources management in southern Africa . Stockholm: SIDA (Publications on Water Resources 17), 2000.
• 32. Kibiiy J. and Kosgei J., Long-Term Water Planning : A Review of Kenya National Water Master Plan 2030 , in Water Resources Management . 2018, Springer: Berlin, Germany. p. 193–208.
• 41. LVBC, Mara river basin-wide water allocation plan . 2013, Lake Victoria Basin Commission: Kisumu, Kenya.
• 43. Mirumachi N., Transboundary Water Politics in the Developing World . 2015, New York Routledge.
• 46. Kesti E., Domestic water supply policy evaluation : A comparative case study of Uganda and Madagascar between 1992 and 2016 . 2019, Lund University Lund, Sweden.
• 47. GoBF, Le PAGIRE dans le contexte du secteur de l’eau du Burkina . Document debase : Table ronde des bailleurs de fonds du plan d’action pour la gestion intégrée des ressources en eau ., Faso G.d.B., Editor. 2003, GoBF Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
• 49. Gupta J., Driving forces in global freshwater governance. In: Water Policy Entrepreneurs : A Research Companion to Water Transitions Around the Globe ., Huitema D. and Meijerink S., Editors. 2009, Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK. p. 37–57.
• 50. Sabatier P.A. and Jenkins-Smith H.C., Policy change and learning : An advocacy coalition approach . 1993, Colorado, USA.: Westview Pr.
• 51. Moyo S. and Chambati W., Land and Agrarian Reform in Zimbabwe . 2013, Dakar, Senegal.: African Books Collective.
• 55. Denby K., et al., The’trickle down’of IWRM : A case study of local-level realities in the Inkomati Water Management Area , South Africa . 2016.
• 56. Denby K., et al., The’trickle down’of IWRM : A case study of local-level realities in the Inkomati Water Management Area , South Africa . 2016, Harae, Zimbabwe.: Weaver Press.
• 58. Denby K., et al., The ‘trickle down’of integrated water resources management : A case study of local-level realities in the Inkomati water management area , South Africa . 2017, Harare, Zimbabwe.: Weaver Press.
• 59. Hellum A. and Derman B., Negotiating water rights in the context of a new political and legal landscape in Zimbabwe , in Mobile People , Mobile Law . 2017, Routledge: London, UK. p. 189–210.
• 62. GoZ, Zimbabwe Water Act . 1998, GoZ: Harare, Zimbabwe.
• 63. GoZ, Zimbabwe National Water Authority (Chapter 20 : 25) . 1998, Zimbabwe National Water Authority (ZINWA): Harare, Zimbabwe.
• 65. Jønch-Clausen T.J.W., what and how, Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) and Water Efficiency Plans by 2005 : Why , What , and How . 2004: p. 5–4.
• 69. Allan J.A. and Mirumachi N., Why Negotiate? Asymmetric Endowments, Asymmetric Power and the Invisible Nexus of Water, Trade and Power that Brings Apparent Water Security, in Transboundary water management Earle A., Jägerskog A., and Öjendal J., Editors. 2010, Stockholm International Water Institute: London. p. 13–26.
• 70. Cascão A.E. and Zeitoun M., Power, Hegemony and Critical Hydropolitics, in Transboundary Water Management Earle A., Jägerskog A., and Öjendal J., Editors. 2010, Stockholm International Water Institute: London p. 27–42.
• 71. Cascão A. and Zeitoon M., Changing nature of bargaining power in the hydropolitical relations in the Nile River Basin, in Transboundary water management , Earle A., Jägerskog A., and Öjendal J., Editors. 2010, Stockholm International Water Institute: London. p. 189–194.
• 73. Heyns P. Strategic and Technical Considerations in the Assessment of Transboundary Water Management with Reference to Southern Africa. in Water , Development and Cooperation- Comparative Perspective : Euphrates-Tigris and Southern Africa . 2005. Bonn Bonn International Center for Conversion.
• 74. Ashton P. and Turton A., Water and Security in Sub-Saharan Africa: Emerging Concepts and their Implications for Effective Water Resource Management in the Southern African Region, in Facing Global Environmental Change , Brauch H.G., et al., Editors. 2009, Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg. p. 661–674.
• 75. Ashton P. and Turton A. Transboundary Water Resource Management in Southern Africa: Opportunities, Challenges and Lessons Learned. in Water , Development and Cooperation-Comparative Perspective : Euphrates-Tigris and Southern Africa . 2005. Bonn International Center for Conversion.
• 76. Swatuk L.A. Political Challenges to Sustainably Managing Intra-Basin Water Resources in Southern Africa: Drawing Lessons from Cases. in Water , Development and Cooperation- Comparative Perspective : Euphrates-Tigris and Southern Africa . 2005. Bonn: Bonn International Center for Conversion.
• 77. Daoudy M., Getting Beyond the Environment–Conflict Trap: Benefit Sharing in International River Basins, in Transboundary water management , Earle A., Jägerskog A., and Öjendal J., Editors. 2010, Stockholm International Water Institute: London p. 43–58.
• 79. Bhattacharyya S., Bugatti N., and Bauer H., A bottom-up approach to the nexus of energy , food and water security in the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) region . 2015, London: Economic and Social Research Council.
• 80. Olomoda I.A. Integrated Water Resources Management: The Niger Basin Authority’s Experience. in From Conflict to Co-operation in International Water Resources Management : Challenges and Opportunities . 2002. Delft, The Netherlands.
• 81. Andersen I., et al., The Niger River Basin : A Vision for Sustainable Management , ed. Golitzen K.G. 2005, Washington, DC: World Bank.
• 85. UNEP, Progress on integrated water resources management. Global baseline for SDG 6 Indicator 6 . 5 . 1 : degree of IWRM implementation . 2018, United Nations Environment Programme: Nairobi.

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

•  We're Hiring!
•  Help Center

Water resource management

• Most Cited Papers
• Most Downloaded Papers
• Newest Papers
• Last »
• Canals Follow Following
• River Basin Management Follow Following
• Indo-Pak Studies Follow Following
• Irrigation Engineering Follow Following
• Integrated River Basin Managent Follow Following
• Runoff Follow Following
• Natural Resource Management Follow Following
• Climate Chnage Follow Following
• Strategic Action Follow Following
• Rainfall Follow Following

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• Academia.edu Journals
•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

Integrated Water Resources Management: Concept, Research and Implementation

• First Online: 20 April 2016

Cite this chapter

• Ralf B. Ibisch 4 ,
• Janos J. Bogardi 5 &
• Dietrich Borchardt 4  

2958 Accesses

12 Citations

3 Altmetric

This chapter reviews the concept, contemporary research efforts and the implementation of Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) which has evolved as the guiding water management paradigm over the last three decades. After analyzing the starting points and historical developments of the IWRM concept this chapter expands on relations with recently upcoming concepts emphasizing adaptive water management and the land-water-food-energy nexus. Although being practically adopted worldwide, IWRM is still a major research topic in water sciences and its implementation is a great challenge for many countries. We have selected fourteen comprehensive IWRM research projects with worldwide coverage for a meta-analysis of motivations, settings, approaches and implementation. Aiming to be an up-to-date interdisciplinary scientific reference, this chapter provides a comprehensive theoretical and empirical analysis of contemporary IWRM research, examples of science based implementations and a synthesis of the lessons learnt. The chapter concludes with some major future challenges, the solving of which will further strengthen the IWRM concept.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime
• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info
• Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Water Resources Management: Integrated and Adaptive Decision Making

Integrated Water Resources Management: Theoretical Concepts, Basis, Responsibilities, and Challenges of IWRM

Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) in a Changing World

Alaerts GJ (2009) Knowledge and capacity development (KCD) as tool for institutional strengthening and change. In: Alaerts GJ, Dickinson N (eds) Water for a changing world—developing local knowledge and capacity. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 5–26

Google Scholar  

Alcamo J (2008) The SAS approach: combining qualitative and quantitative knowledge in environmental scenarios. In: Alcamo J (ed) Environmental futures: the practice of environmental scenario analysis. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 123–150

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Allen CR, Gunderson LH (2011) Pathology and failure in the design and implementation of adaptive management. J Environ Manage 92:1379–1384

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Bärlund I, Flörke M, Völker J, Kaus A, Malsy M, Reder K, Büttner O, Katterfeld C, Dietrich D, Matovelle A, Alcamo J, Borchardt D (2014) Towards a world water quality assessment. Presentation given at the World Water Week 2014. Available at http://programme.worldwaterweek.org/sites/default/files/wwqa-www2014_final_ilona.pdf . Accessed 02 April 2015

Bekchanov M, Lamers JPA, Bhaduri A, Lenzen M, Tischbein B (2016) Input-output model-based water footprint indicators to support IWRM in the irrigated drylands of Uzbekistan, Central Asia. In: Borchardt D, Bogardi J, Ibisch R (eds) Integrated water resources management: concept, research and implementation. Springer, Berlin

Bernhofer C, Barfus K, Pavlik D, Borges P, Söhl D (2016) Climate change information for IWRM. In: Borchardt D, Bogardi J, Ibisch R (eds) Integrated water resources management: concept, research and implementation. Springer, Berlin

Biswas A (2004) Integrated water resources management: a reassessment. Water Int 29(2):248–256

Article   Google Scholar  

Biswas A (2008) Integrated water resources management: is it working? Int J Water Resour Dev 24:5–22

Blokland MW, Alaerts GJ, Kasperma JM, Hare M (eds) (2009) Capacity development for improved water management. CRC Press, London

BMZ (German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development) (1999) Partizipative Entwicklungszusammenarbeit, Übersektorales Konzept. BMZ Konzepte, 102, Bonn/Berlin

Bogardi JJ (1990) Op weg naar integraal waterbeheer (On the road towards integrated water management). Inaugural lecture, published by Wageningen Agricultural University, 37 pp

Bogardi JJ, Dudgeon D, Lawford R, Flinkerbusch E, Meyn A, Pahl-Wostl C, Vielhauer K, Vörösmarty Ch (2012) Water security for a planet under pressure: interconnected challenges of a changing world call for sustainable solutions. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 4(1):35–43

Bonzi C, Onigkeit J, Hoff H, Joyce B, Tielbörger K (2016) Analysing stakeholder driven scenarios with a transboundary water planning tool for IWRM in the Jordan River basin. In: Borchardt D, Bogardi J, Ibisch R (eds) Integrated water resources management: concept, research and implementation. Springer, Berlin

Borchardt D, Bjørnsen PK, Bogardi JJ et al (2013) Message from the Dresden international conference on integrated water resources management: management of water in a changing world: lessons learnt and innovative perspectives. In: Borchardt D, Ibisch R (eds) Integrated water resources management in a changing world: lessons learnt and innovation perspectives. IWA Publishing, London, pp 12–14

Burton J (2003) Integrated water resources management on a basin level a training manual, UNESCO IHP & Editions MultiMondes

Butterworth J, Warner J, Moriarty P et al (2010) Finding practical approaches to integrated water resources management. Water Altern 3(1):68–81

Chen A, Weisbrod N (2016) Assessment of anthropogenic impact on the environmental flows of semi-arid watersheds: the case study of the lower Jordan River. In: Borchardt D, Bogardi J, Ibisch R (eds) Integrated water resources management: concept, research and implementation. Springer, Berlin

Cooke B, Kothari U (eds) (2001) Participation. The new tyranny?. Zed Books, London/New York

Dombrowsky I, Hagemann N, Houdret A (2014) The river basin as a new scale for water governance in transition countries? A comparative study of Mongolia and Ukraine. Environ Earth Sci 72(12):4705–4726

EC 2000/60/EC (2000) Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities L 327/1

Ganoulis J (2005) Integrated decision support systems (DSS) or integrating multiple objectives to help decision making? Position paper for the international workshop on success and failure of DSS for integrated water resources management. Venice, Italy, 6–7 Oct 2005

Görgens A, Pegram G, Uys M, Grobicki A, Loots L, Tanner A, Bengu R (1998) Guidelines for catchment management to achieve integrated water resources management in South Africa. Water Commission Research Report No. 108/98, Pretoria, South Africa 69 pp

Giupponi C, Mysiak J, Fassio A, Cogan V (2004) MULINO-DSS: a computer tool for sustainable use of water resources at the catchment scale. Math Comput Simul 64:13–24

Gupta J, Pahl-Wostl C, Zondervan R (2013) ‘Glocal’ water governance: a multi-level challenge in the anthropocene. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 5(6):573–580. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.09.003

GWP (2000) Integrated water resources management. TAC Background papers No. 4, Global water partnership, technical advisory committee (TAC)

GWP (2003) Integrated water resources management toolbox: sharing knowledge for equitable, efficient and sustainable water resources management: global water partnership, Stockholm

Hering JG, Ingold KM (2012) Water resources management: what should be integrated? Science 336(6086):1234–1235

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Hoff H (2011) Understanding the Nexus. Background paper for the Bonn 2011 Nexus conference: the water, energy and food security Nexus. Szockholm Environmental Institute, Stockholm, pp 51

Hofmann J, Tuul D, Enkhtuya B (2016) Agriculture in Mongolia under pressure of agronomic nutrient imbalances and food security demands: A case study of stakeholder participation for future nutrient and water resource management. In: Borchardt D, Bogardi J, Ibisch R (eds) Integrated water resources management: concept, research and implementation. Springer, Berlin

Hornidge AK, Oberkircher L, Tischbein B, Schorcht G, Bhaduri A, Awan UK, Manschadi AM (2016) Reconceptualising water management in Khorezm, Uzbekistan: recommendations towards IWRM. In: Borchardt D, Bogardi J, Ibisch R (eds) Integrated water resources management: concept, research and implementation. Springer, Berlin

Ibisch R, Leidel M, Niemann S, Hornidge AK, Goedert R (2016) Capacity development as a key factor for integrated water resources management (IWRM): lessons learned from a series of applied research projects. In: Borchardt D, Bogardi J, Ibisch R (eds) Integrated water resources management: concept, research and implementation. Springer, Berlin

Ibisch R, Kirschke S, Stärz C, Borchardt D (eds) (2013) Integrated water resources management (IWRM): from research to implementation. Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Leipzig, Magdeburg, p 83. Available at http://www.bmbf.wasserressourcen-management.de/_media/130624_IWRM_Broschuere_ENG_Doppelseiten_web.pdf . Accessed 19 Feb 2015

Jeffrey P, Gearey M (2006) Integrated water resources management: Lost on the road from ambition to realisation? Water Sci Technol 53:1–8

Kaden SO, Geiger WF (2016) Overall-effective measures for sustainable water resources management in the coastal area of Shandong Province, PR China. In: Borchardt D, Bogardi J, Ibisch R (eds) Integrated water resources management: concept, research and implementation. Springer, Berlin

Kalbus E, Kalbacher T, Kolditz O, Krüger E, Seegert J, Teutsch G, Krebs P, Borchardt D (2012) IWAS – Integrated Water Resources Management under different hydrological, climatic and socio-economic conditions. IWAS SI editorial. Environ Earth Sci 65(5):1363–1366. doi: 10.1007/s12665-011-1330-3

Karthe D, Heldt S, Rost G, Londong J, Ilian J, Heppeler J, Stäudel J, Khurelbaatar G, Sullivan C, van Afferden M, Scharaw B, Westerhoff T, Dietze S, Sigel K, Hofmann J, Watson V, Borchardt D (2016) Modular concept for municipal water management in the Kharaa River Basin, Mongolia. In: Borchardt D, Bogardi J, Ibisch R (eds) Integrated water resources management: concept, research and implementation. Springer, Berlin

Kim EA, Hornidge AK (2016) IWRM in Uzbekistan: a global concept with local consequences. In: Borchardt D, Bogardi J, Ibisch R (eds) Integrated water resources management: concept, research and implementation. Springer, Berlin

Kirschke S, Horlemann L, Brenda M, Deffner J, Jokisch A, Mohajeri S, Onigkeit J (2016) Benefits and barriers of participation: experiences of applied research projects in integrated water resources management. In: Borchardt D, Bogardi J, Ibisch R (eds) Integrated water resources management: concept, research and implementation. Springer, Berlin

Klepper G (ed) (2011) Global change research in Germany 2011. German National Committee on Global Change Research (NKGCF), Kiel Institute for the World Economy. Available at http://www.fona.de/mediathek/pdf/GC-Research_in_Germany_2011.pdf . Accessed 19 Feb 2015

Klinger J, Riepl D, Wolff HP, Heinz I, Rödiger T, Guttman J, Samhan S, Tamimi A, Subah A, Sauter M, Müller R, Geyer S, Ali W, v. Afferden M, Lee MY, Hötzl H, Liesch T, Goldscheider N (2016) Challenges of implementing IWRM in the Lower Jordan Valley. In: Borchardt D, Bogardi J, Ibisch R (eds) Integrated water resources management: concept, research and implementation. Springer, Berlin

Kuenzer C, Moder F, Jaspersen V, Ahrens M, Fabritius M, Funkenberg T, Huth J, Tri VK, Long TT, Nguyen LD, Dech S (2016) A water related information system for the sustainable development of the mekong delta: experiences of the German-Vietnamese WISDOM project. In: Borchardt D, Bogardi J, Ibisch R (eds) Integrated water resources management: concept, research and implementation. Springer, Berlin

Leidel M, Niemann S, Hagemann N (2012) Capacity development as key factor for Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM): improving water management in the Western Bug River Basin, Ukraine. Environ Earth Sci 65:1415–1426

Liehr S, Brenda M, Cornel P, Deffner J, Felmeden J, Jokisch A, Kluge T, Müller K, Röhrig J, Stibitz V, Urban W (2016) From the concept to the tap—integrated water resources management in Northern Namibia. In: Borchardt D, Bogardi J, Ibisch R (eds) Integrated water resources management: concept, research and implementation. Springer, Berlin

Lorz C, Borges P, Franz C, Hoefer R, Koschke L, Makeschin F, Strauch M, Weiss H (2016) Dynamic land use change as challenge for IWRM: a case study in Central Brazil. In: Borchardt D, Bogardi J, Ibisch R (eds) Integrated water resources management: concept, research and implementation. Springer, Berlin

Martínez-Santos P, Aldaya MM, Ramón Llamas M (2014) Integrated water resources management: state of the art and the way forward. In: Martínez-Santos P, Aldaya MM, Ramón Llamas M (eds) Integrated Water Resources Management in the 21st Century: Revisiting the paradigm. CRC Press/Balkema, EH Leiden, The Netherlands, pp 17–36

Meissner R, Gebel M, Hagenau J, Halbfass S, Engelke P, Giessler M, Duan S, Lu B, Wang X (2016) WebGIS-based approach to simulate water and solute fluxes in the Miyun basin in China. In: Borchardt D, Bogardi J, Ibisch R (eds) Integrated water resources management: concept, research and implementation. Springer, Berlin

Mitchell B (2005) Integrated water resource management, institutional arrangements, and land-use planning. Environ Plan A 37:1335–1352

Mohajeri S, Horlemann L, Sklorz S, Kaltofen M, Ghanavizchian S, Nuñez von Voigt T (2016) Integrated water resource management in Isfahan: the Zayandeh Rud catchment. In: Borchardt D, Bogardi J, Ibisch R (eds) Integrated water resources management: concept, research and implementation. Springer, Berlin

Molle F (2008) Nirvana concepts, narratives and policy models: insights from the water sector. Water Altern 1(1):131–156

Mollinga PP (2008) Water, politics and development: framing a political sociology of water resources management. Water Altern 1(1):7–23

Monsees J, Beveridge R, Moss T (2016) Addressing water conflicts through context-specific institutional analysis: a handbook for research projects and programmes. In: Borchardt D, Bogardi J, Ibisch R (eds) Integrated water resources management: concept, research and implementation. Springer, Berlin

Moss T (2007) Solving problems of ‘fit’ at the expense of problems of ‘Interplay’? The spatial reorganisation of water management following the EU water framework directive. In: Peter P, Mollinga PP, Dixit A, Athukorala K (eds) Integrated water resources management. Global theory, emerging practice and local needs. Sage Publications, New Delhi/Thousand Oaks/London, pp 64–108

Mostert E (2003) The challenge of public participation. Water Policy 5:179–197

Mukhtarov FG (2008) Intellectual history and current status of integrated water resources management: a global perspective. In: Pahl-Wostl C, Kabat P, Möltgen J (eds) Adaptive and integrated water management. Springer, Berlin, pp 167–185

Onigkeit J, Simon KH, Alcamo J, Tielbörger K (2016) Participative scenario development as a method to integrate science and IWRM—lessons learnt from a case study in the Jordan River region. In: Borchardt D, Bogardi J, Ibisch R (eds) Integrated water resources management: concept, research and implementation. Springer, Berlin

Otto IM, Wechsung F, Wang X, Möhring J, Tan R (2016) Water scarcity impacts and challenges of water governance in the Guanting Basin, North China. Evidence from interviews with local stakeholders. In: Borchardt D, Bogardi J, Ibisch R (eds) Integrated water resources management: concept, research and implementation. Springer, Berlin

Özerol G, Newig J (2008) Evaluating the success of public participation in water resources management: five key constituents. Water Policy 10:639–655

Pahl-Wostl C (2007) The implications of complexity for integrated resources management. Environ Model Softw 22:561–569

Pahl-Wostl C, Craps M, Dewulf A, Mostert E, Tabara D, Taillieu T (2007) Social learning and water resources management. Ecol Soc 12(2):5 [online] http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art5/

Pahl-Wostl C, Jeffrey P, Isendahl I, Brugnach M (2011) Maturing the new water management paradigm: progressing from aspiration to practice. Water Resour Manage 25:837–856. doi: 10.1007/s11269-010-9729-2

Pahl-Wostl C, Arthington A, Bogardi J, Bunn S, Hoff H, Lebel L, Nikitina E, Palmer M, Poff LN, Richards K, Schlueter M, Schulze R, St-Hilaire A, Tharme R, Tockner K, Tsegai D (2013) Environmental flows and water governance: managing sustainable water uses. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 5:341–351

Reed MS (2008) Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol Conserv 141:2417–2431

Reichmann O, Chen Y, Litaor, IM (2016) The impact of rainfall-runoff events on the water quality of the upper catchment of the Jordan River, Israel. In: Borchardt D, Bogardi J, Ibisch R (eds) Integrated water resources management: concept, research and implementation. Springer, Berlin

Renn O (2006) Participatory processes for designing environmental policies. Land Use Policy 23:34–43

Rijkswaterstaat (Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat) (1989) Derde Nota Waterhuishouding. Water voor nu et later (in Dutch), SDU Uitgeverij, #s Gravenhage

Ringler C, Bhaduri A, Lawford R (2013) The nexus across water, energy, land and food (WELF) potential for improved resource use efficiency? Curr Opin Environ Sustain 5(6):617–624. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.11.002

Rosegrant MW, Cai, X, Cline SA (2002) World Water and Food to 2025: Dealing with Scarcity. International Food Policy Research Institute Washington, D.C. Available at http://www.ifpri.org/sites/default/files/publications/water2025.pdf . Assessed 24 Feb 2015

Sade R, Rimmer A, Samuels R, Salingar Y, Denisyuk M, Alpert P (2016) Water management in a complex hydrological basin—application of water evaluation and planning tool (WEAP) to the Lake Kinneret watershed, Israel. In: Borchardt D, Bogardi J, Ibisch R (eds) Integrated water resources management: concept, research and implementation. Springer, Berlin

Savenije HHG, Van der Zaag P (2008) Integrated water resources management: concepts and issues. Phys Chem Earth 33:290–297. doi: 10.1016/j.pce.2008.02.003

Schacht K, Chen Y, Tarchitzky J, Marschner B (2016) The use of treated wastewater for irrigation as a component of integrated water resources management: reducing environmental implications on soil and groundwater by evaluating site-specific soil sensitivities. In: Borchardt D, Bogardi J, Ibisch R (eds) Integrated water resources management: concept, research and implementation. Springer, Berlin

Schoeman J, Allan C, Finlayson CM (2014) A new paradigm for water? A comparative review of integrated, adaptive and ecosystem-based water management in the Anthropocene. Int J Water Resour Dev 30(3):377–390. doi: 10.1080/07900627.2014.907087

Siebert C, Rödiger T, Schulz S, Horovitz M, Merz R, Friesen J, Dietrich P, Michelsen N, Kallioras A, Rausch R, Engelhardt I, Al-Saud M, Schüth C (2016a) New tools for coherent information base for IWRM in arid regions: the upper mega aquifer system on the Arabian Peninsula. In: Borchardt D, Bogardi J, Ibisch R (eds) Integrated water resources management: concept, research and implementation. Springer, Berlin

Siebert C, Rödiger T, Geyer S, Laronne JB, Hillel N, Sauter M, Mallast U (2016b) Multidisciplinary investigations of the transboundary Dead Sea basin and its water resources. In: Borchardt D, Bogardi J, Ibisch R (eds) Integrated water resources management: concept, research and implementation. Springer, Berlin

Sigel K, Klauer B, Pahl-Wostl C (2010) Conceptualising uncertainty in environmental decisionmaking: the example of the EU water framework directive. Ecol Econ 69:502–510

Speth P, Christoph M, Diekkrüger B (2010) Impacts of global change on the water cycle in west and Northwest Africa. Springer, Heidelberg 675 pp

Book   Google Scholar  

Stålnacke P, Gooch GD (2010) Integrated water resources management. Irrig Drainage Syst 24:155–159. doi: 10.1007/s10795-010-9106-6

Stärz C, Kaden S, Klauer B, Leben L (2016) Decision support in the context of IWRM: Lessons learnt from research projects in developing and emerging countries. In: Borchardt D., Bogardi J, Ibisch R (eds) Integrated water resources management: concept, research and implementation. Springer, Berlin

Tharme R (2003) A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers. River Res Appl 19(5–6):397–441

The World Bank (2006) Integrated river basin management—from concepts to good practice. Briefing note No. 12: stakeholder partnerships, participation, and funding, Washington D.C

Tielbörger K, Claus C, Schloz D, Twite R, Al-Karablieh E, Salman A, Jayyousi A, Alpert P (2016) Sustainable water and land management under global change—the GLOWA Jordan River Project. In: Borchardt D, Bogardi J, Ibisch R (eds) Integrated water resources management: concept, research and implementation. Springer, Berlin

United Nations (2002) Plan of implementation of the world summit on sustainable development. Available at http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/documents/WSSD_POI_PD/English/WSSD_PlanImpl.pdf . Accessed 02 April 2015

United Nations Development Programme (2004) Water governance for poverty reduction. Key Issues and the UNDP Response to Millenium Development Goals. United Nations Development Programme New York

United Nations Development Programme (2009) Supporting capacity development—The UNDP approach. United Nations Development Programme New York

UN (2010) The human right to water and sanitation. United Nations Resolution 64/292. Available at http://www.un.org/en/ga/64/resolutions.shtml . Accessed 25 June 2015

UNESCO (2009) World water assessment program. The united nations world water development report 3: Water in a Changing World. Paris

UNESCO (2012) World Water Assessment Program. The united nations world water development report 4: Managing water under uncertainty and risk. Paris

UN-Water (2012): Status report on the application of integrated approaches to water resources management. http://www.unwater.org/downloads/UNW_status_report_Rio2012.pdf . Accessed 05 April 2013

Von Korff Y, d’Aquino P, Daniell KA, Bijlsma R (2010) Designing participation processes for water management and beyond. Ecol Soc 15(3):1

Von Witsch U (2008) GLOWA: a German initiative to meet a global challenge. The innovative GLOWA approach. In: German national committee for the international hydrological programme (IHP) of UNESCO, Hydrology and Water Resources Programme (HWRP) of WMO (eds) GLOWA Global change and the Hydrological Cycle. IHP/HWRP reports 7, 12–14

Walters CJ (1986) Adaptive management of renewable resources. Macmillan, New York

Download references

Acknowledgements

The editors would like to thank the researchers who responded to our call and provided research results or reviews for this book on IWRM. Thanks also to the numerous independent reviewers who gave valuable comments on earlier drafts of the manuscripts. The funding by the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) which has made the research and this publication possible is gratefully acknowledged. The authors thank Dr Stephan Klapp of Springer publishing for his interest in highlighting the IWRM topic with this book and his highly constructive cooperation during the entire publishing process.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Magdeburg, Germany

Ralf B. Ibisch & Dietrich Borchardt

Center for Development Research - ZEF, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany

Janos J. Bogardi

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralf B. Ibisch .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Helmholtz Centre Environmental Research, Magdeburg, Germany

Dietrich Borchardt

Center for Development Research - ZEF, Bonn, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany

Helmholtz Centre Environmental Research, Magdeburg, Sachsen-Anhalt, Germany

Ralf B. Ibisch

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Ibisch, R.B., Bogardi, J.J., Borchardt, D. (2016). Integrated Water Resources Management: Concept, Research and Implementation. In: Borchardt, D., Bogardi, J., Ibisch, R. (eds) Integrated Water Resources Management: Concept, Research and Implementation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25071-7_1

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25071-7_1

Published : 20 April 2016

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-319-25069-4

Online ISBN : 978-3-319-25071-7

eBook Packages : Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedical and Life Sciences (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

Assistant Research Officer - Water Resources Management

• From International Water Management Institute (IWMI)
• Published on 27.08.24

Share this to :

The International Water Management Institute (IWMI), a CGIAR Research Center is seeking a motivated and talented professional to join its headquarters in Battaramulla, Sri Lanka as an Assistant Research Officer – Water Resources Management*.

The Assistant Research Officer - Water Resources Management will play a key role in supporting water resources projects using tools such as GIS, remote sensing, numerical modeling, and data analysis, with a focus on sustainable water resource practices. This position requires experience in groundwater-related research. It also involves coordinating on-site project activities, managing water demand and usage data collection, and collaborating with field staff and stakeholders, including government departments, universities, and NGOs.

The incumbent will also support national initiatives of the International Water Management Institute (IWMI) and contribute to the execution of research projects in Sri Lanka, funded bilaterally or through CGIAR research initiatives. The successful candidate should be able to plan and implement fieldwork, support data analysis, and coordinate stakeholder consultations, workshops, and the timely delivery of project outputs.

DUTIES & RESPONSIBILITIES:

• Organize and execute field research activities, ensuring that data collection aligns with project objectives and timelines.
• Oversee the logistics of field visits, including coordinating with field teams, securing necessary permits, and managing resources required for fieldwork.
• Conduct comprehensive literature reviews to gather relevant information and contextualize research findings.
• Assist in designing and executing primary and secondary data collection methods, including surveys, interviews, and other research tools.
• Collaborate closely with project teams to ensure the effective implementation of the FCDO-funded project on groundwater management in Jaffna.
• Liaise with government agencies, non-governmental organizations, and other relevant partners to facilitate project activities and ensure compliance with local regulations.
• Perform data analysis using appropriate statistical and analytical tools to derive meaningful insights from the collected data.
• Contribute to preparing project reports, including drafting sections, reviewing content, and ensuring alignment with project objectives.
• Assist in developing research publications, including peer-reviewed articles, policy briefs, and other dissemination materials.

Requirements

EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS & EXPERIENCE:

• Bachelor’s degree in Science, Engineering, or a related field, with at least 01 year of research experience.
• Experience in GIS and remote sensing applications for groundwater management.
• Experience in collecting field datasets, as well as managing and analysing large spatial datasets using open-source tools and software.
• Working experience in the Northern Region of Sri Lanka.

KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS & ABILITIES:

• Strong understanding of hydrological processes and modelling tools used for water resources assessment, including earth observation data.
• Proficiency in Python and familiarity with Google Earth Engine (GEE) for processing earth observation data.
• Strong interpersonal skills and the ability to work in a multidisciplinary, multi-institutional, and multicultural environment.
• Ability to communicate complex groundwater-related issues to diverse audiences.
• Excellent oral and written language skills in English, including effective listening and strong verbal and written communication abilities.
• Understanding of integrated surface water-groundwater modelling practices.

This is a nationally recruited position and only Sri Lankan nationals will be considered. IWMI offers a competitive salary and benefits package, inclusive of health insurance, life insurance, accidental death and dismemberment (AD&D) insurance, and long-term disability coverage. The duration of the contract will initially be for a period of three years with the possibility of extension.

*Please note that should a qualified candidate at the Assistant Research Officer level not be identified, or if a suitable candidate at the Research Officer level is found during the selection process, the position will be adjusted accordingly.

IWMI strongly values diversity; therefore, qualified women are highly encouraged to apply.

HOW TO APPLY: Apply for the position by following the application instructions at www.iwmi.org/jobs . We will be accepting applications through 24:00 (IST) on September 11, 2024 (applications will be reviewed on a rolling basis). Your application must include a CV, cover letter, and three (3) references, which may be contacted if you are shortlisted. Receipt of all applications will be acknowledged, but only short-listed candidates will be contacted.

IWMI believes that diversity powers our innovation, contributes to our excellence, and is critical for our mission. We offer a multi-cultural, multi-color, multi-generational and multi-disciplinary working environment. We are consciously creating an inclusive organization that reflects our global character and our commitment to gender equity. We, therefore, encourage applicants from all cultures, races, ethnicities, religions, sexes, national or regional origins, ages, disability status, sexual orientations, and gender identities.

This website uses cookies in order to improve the use experience and provide additional functionality Detail

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Recommended Articles
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Sustainable water resources management: a bibliometric overview.

1. Introduction

2. theoretical framework, 3. methodology, 3.1. databases, 3.2. tracking methodology, 3.3. methodology of calculations, 3.3.1. meyer’s index, 3.3.2. traditional overlap (to), 3.3.3. relative overlap, 4. results and discussion, 4.1. production, 4.2. citations, 4.3. overlap and singularity, 4.4. authors, 4.5. journals, 5. conclusions, author contributions, conflicts of interest.

• Jackson, R.B.; Carpenter, S.R.; Dahm, C.N.; McKnight, D.M.; Naiman, R.J.; Postel, S.L.; Running, S.W. Water in a changing world. Ecol. Appl. 2001 , 11 , 1027–1045. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• United Nations. El derecho humano al agua y al saneamiento. In Resolución Aprobada por la Asamblea General en la 108ª Sesión Plenaria de 28 de julio de 2010 (A/RES/64/292) ; United Nations: New York. NY, USA, 2010. [ Google Scholar ]
• International Union for Conservation of Nature, Natural Resources & World Wildlife Fund. World Conservation Strategy: Living Resource Conservation for Sustainable Development ; IUCN: Gland, Switzerland, 1980. [ Google Scholar ]
• Brundtland, G.H. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: “Our Common Future” ; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1987. [ Google Scholar ]
• Gain, A.K.; Mondal, M.S.; Rahman, R. From flood control to water management: A journey of Bangladesh towards integrated water resources management. Water 2017 , 9 , 55. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Global Water Partnership (GWP). Integrated Water Resources Management ; TAC Background Paper Nº. 4; Global Water Partnership (GWP): Stockholm, Sweden, 2000. [ Google Scholar ]
• Grigg, N.S. Integrated water resources management: Balancing views and improving practice. Water Int. 2008 , 33 , 279–292. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jønch-Clausen, T.; Fugl, J. Firming up the conceptual basis of integrated water resources management. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 2001 , 17 , 501–510. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wallace, J.S.; Acreman, M.C.; Sullivan, C.A. The sharing of water between society and ecosystems: From conflict to catchment–based co–management. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2003 , 358 , 2011–2026. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Kostoff, R.N.; Shlesinger, M.F. CAB: Citation-assisted background. Scientometrics 2005 , 62 , 199–212. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Low, M.B.; MacMillan, I.C. Entrepreneurship: Past Research and Future Challenges. J. Manag. 1988 , 14 , 139–161. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tranfield, D.; Denyer, D.; Smart, P. Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Br. J. Manag. 2003 , 14 , 207–222. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Falkenmark, M. The massive water scarcity threatening Africa—Why isn’t it being addressed. Ambio 1989 , 18 , 112–118. [ Google Scholar ]
• Falkenmark, M. Rapid Population Growth and Water Scarcity: The Predicament of Tomorrow’s Africa. Popul. Dev. Rev. 1990 , 16 , 81–94. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gleick, P.H. Basic water requirements for human activities: Meeting basic needs. Water Int. 1996 , 21 , 83–92. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Asheesh, M. Allocating gaps of shared water resources (scarcity index): Case study on Palestine-Israel. In Water Resources in the Middle East ; Springer: Heidelberg/Berlin, Germany, 2007; pp. 241–248. [ Google Scholar ]
• World Bank. World Development Report 1992: Development and the Environment ; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1992. [ Google Scholar ]
• Palmer, R.N.; Werick, W.J.; MacEwan, A.; Woods, A.W. Modeling water resources opportunities, challenges and trade-offs: The use of shared vision modeling for negotiation and conflict resolution. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Water Resources Planning and Management Conference ASCE (WRPMD’99), Tempe, AZ, USA, 6–9 June 1999; pp. 1–13. [ Google Scholar ]
• Biswas, A.K. Water Policies in the Developing World. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 2001 , 17 , 489–499. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Biswas, A.K.; Tortajada, C. (Eds.) Appraising the Conceit of Sustainable Development: Water Management and Related Environmental Challenges ; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2004. [ Google Scholar ]
• Jeffrey, P.; Gearey, M. Integrated water resources management: Lost on the road from ambition to realisation? Water Sci. Technol. 2006 , 53 , 1–8. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Petit, O.; Baron, C. Integrated Water Resources Management: From general principles to its implementation by the state. The case of Burkina Faso. Nat. Resour. Forum 2009 , 33 , 49–59. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gallego-Ayala, J. Trends in integrated water resources management research: A literature review. Water Policy 2013 , 15 , 628–647. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Biswas, A.K. Integrated water resources management: Is it working? Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 2008 , 24 , 5–22. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ludwig, F.; Van Slobbe, E.; Cofino, W. Climate change adaptation and Integrated Water Resource Management in the water sector. J. Hydrol. 2014 , 518 , 235–242. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jouravlev, A. Administración del agua en América Latina y Caribe en el Umbral del Siglo XXI ; CEPAL: Santiago de Chile, Chile, 2001. [ Google Scholar ]
• Biswas, A.K. Integrated water resources management: A reassessment: A water forum contribution. Water Int. 2004 , 29 , 248–256. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Varis, O.; Keskinen, M.; Kummu, M. Mekong at the crossroads. Ambio 2008 , 37 , 146–149. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Van der Zaag, P. Integrated Water Resources Management: Relevant concept or irrelevant buzzword? A capacity building and research agenda for Southern Africa. Phys. Chem. Earth Parts A/B/C 2005 , 30 , 867–871. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Medema, W.; McIntosh, B.; Jeffrey, P. From premise to practice: A critical assessment of integrated water resources management and adaptive management approaches in the water sector. Ecol. Soc. 2008 , 13 , 29. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lubell, M.; Edelenbos, J. Integrated water resources management: A comparative laboratory for water governance. Int. J. Water Gov. 2013 , 1 , 177–196. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Van der Zaag, P.; Gupta, J.; Darvis, L.P. Urgent water challenges are not sufficiently researched. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2009 , 13 , 905–912. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Loucks, D.P. Sustainability implications for water resources planning and management. Nat. Resour. Forum 1994 , 18 , 263–274. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Loucks, D.P. Quantifying trends in system sustainability. Hydrol. Sci. J. 1997 , 42 , 513–530. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Young, M.D. Sustainable Investment and Resource Use ; UNESCO, Man and the Biosphere Series; The Parthenon Publishing Group: Carnforth, UK, 1992; Volume 9. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hopkins, M. Human development revisited: A new UNDP report. World Dev. 1991 , 19 , 1469–1473. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Brown, R.M.; McClelland, N.I.; Deininger, R.A.; O’Connor, M.F. A water quality index—Crashing the psychological barrier. In Indicators of Environmental Quality ; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1972; pp. 173–182. [ Google Scholar ]
• McMahon, T.A.; Adeloye, A.J.; Zhou, S.L. Understanding performance measures of reservoirs. J. Hydrol. 2006 , 324 , 359–382. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mays, L.W. (Ed.) Water Resources Sustainability ; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA; WEF Press: Cologny, Geneva, 2007. [ Google Scholar ]
• Oxley, R.L.; Mays, L.W.; Murray, A. Optimization Model for the Sustainable Water Resource Management of River Basins. Water Resour. Manag. 2016 , 30 , 3247–3264. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cai, X. A Modeling Framework for Sustainable Water Resources Management. Doctoral Dissertation, Center for Research in Water Resources, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA, 1999. Available online: https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstream/handle/2152/6798/crwr_onlinereport99-9.pdf;sequence=2 (accessed on 7 October 2018).
• Andrés, A. Measuring Academic Research: How to Undertake a Bibliometric Study ; Chandos: Oxford, UK, 2009. [ Google Scholar ]
• Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; Podsakoff, N.P.; Bachrach, D.G. Scholarly influence in the field of management: A bibliometric analysis of the determinants of university and author impact in the management literature in the past quarter century. J. Manag. 2008 , 34 , 641–720. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rueda, G.; Gerdsri, P.; Kocaoglu, D.F. Bibliometrics and social network analysis of the nanotechnology field. In Proceedings of the Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology (PICMET), Portland, OR, USA, 5–9 August 2007; pp. 2905–2911. [ Google Scholar ]
• Albort-Morant, G.; Ribeiro-Soriano, D. A bibliometric analysis of international impact of business incubators. J. Bus. Res. 2015 , 69 , 1775–1779. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Norris, M.; Oppenheim, C. Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences’ literature. J. Inf. 2007 , 1 , 161–169. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ramos, J.M.; González-Alcaide, G.; Gutiérrez, F. Análisis bibliométrico de la producción científica española en Enfermedades Infecciosas y en Microbiología. Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica 2016 , 34 , 166–176. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Goodman, D.; Deis, L. Web of Science (2004 version) and Scopus. Charlest. Advis. 2005 , 6 , 5–21. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bar-Ilan, J. Citations to the ‘Introduction to infometrics’ indexed by WOS, Scopus and Google Scholar. Scientometrics 2010 , 82 , 495–506. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Archambault, É.; Campbell, D.; Gingras, Y.; Lariviére, V. Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2009 , 60 , 1320–1326. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Gavel, Y.; Iselid, L. Web of Science and Scopus: A journal title overlap study. Online Inf. Rev. 2008 , 32 , 8–21. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Moed, H.F. The impact-factors debate: The ISI’s uses and limits. Nature 2002 , 415 , 731–732. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Benavides-Velasco, C.A.; Guzmán-Parra, V.; Quintana-García, C. Evolución de la literatura sobre empresa familiar como disciplina científica. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa 2011 , 14 , 78–90. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Maltrás-Barba, B. Los Indicadores Bibliométricos: Fundamentos y Aplicación al Análisis de la Ciencia ; Trea: Asturias, Spain, 2003. [ Google Scholar ]
• Corral, J.A.; Canoves, G. La investigación turística publicada en revistas turísticas y no turísticas: Análisis bibliométrico de la producción de las universidades catalanas. Cuadernos de Turismo 2013 , 31 , 55–81. [ Google Scholar ]
• Pérez, R.R.; López-Cózar, E.D.; Corera, E.; Suárez, M.J.Á.; Contreras, E.J. Tratamiento de los nombres españoles en las bases de datos internacionales: Su incidencia en la recuperación de información y en los análisis bibliométricos. In La Representación y la Organización del Conocimiento en sus Distintas Perspectivas: Su Influencia en la Recuperación de la Información: Actas del IV Congreso ISKO-España EOCONSID ; Universidad de Granada: Granda, Spain, 1999; Volume 99, pp. 22–24. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ding, Y.; Rousseau, R.; Wolfram, D. Measuring Scholarly Impact: Methods and Practice ; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2014. [ Google Scholar ]
• Merigó, J.M.; Blanco-Mesa, F.; Gil-Lafuente, A.M.; Yager, R.R. Thirty years of the International Journal of Intelligent Systems: A bibliometric review. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2017 , 32 , 526–554. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hirsch, J.E. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005 , 102 , 16569–16572. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ] [ Green Version ]
• Pao, M.L. Term and citation retrieval: A field study. Inf. Proc. Manag. 1993 , 29 , 95–112. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Meyer, D.E.; Mehlman, D.W.; Reeves, E.S.; Origoni, R.B.; Evans, D.; Sellers, D.W. Comparison study of overlap among 21 scientific databases in searching pesticide information. Online Rev. 1983 , 7 , 33–43. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pulgarín, A.; Escalona, M.A. Medida del solapamiento en tres bases de datos con información sobre Ingeniería. Anales de Documentación 2007 , 10 , 335–344. [ Google Scholar ]
• Costas, R.; Moreno, L.; Bordons, M. Solapamiento y singularidad de MEDLINE, WoS e IME para el análisis de la actividad científica en una región en Ciencias de la Salud. Revista Española de Documentación Científica 2008 , 31 , 327–343. [ Google Scholar ]
• Gluck, M.A. Review of Journal Coverage Overlap with an Extension to the Definition of Overlap. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 1990 , 41 , 43–60. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bearman, T.C.; Kunberger, W.A. A Study of Coverage Overlap among Fourteen Major Science and Technology Abstracting and Indexing Services ; National Federation of Abstracting and Indexing Services: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1977. [ Google Scholar ]
• Price, D.J.S. The exponential curve of science. Discovery 1956 , 17 , 240–243. [ Google Scholar ]
• Merigó, J.M.; Mas-Tur, A.; Roig-Tierno, N.; Ribeiro-Soriano, D. A bibliometric overview of the Journal of Business Research between 1973 and 2014. J. Bus. Res. 2015 , 68 , 2645–2653. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Liu, Y.; Gupta, H.; Springer, E.; Wagener, T. Linking science with environmental decision making: Experiences from an integrated modeling approach to supporting sustainable water resources management. Environ. Model. Softw. 2008 , 23 , 846–858. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Li, Y.P.; Huang, G.H.; Huang, Y.F.; Zhou, H.D. A multistage fuzzy-stochastic programming model for supporting sustainable water-resources allocation and management. Environ. Model. Softw. 2009 , 24 , 786–797. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Loucks, D.P. Sustainable water resources management. Water Int. 2000 , 25 , 3–10. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zalewski, M. Ecohydrology—The use of ecological and hydrological processes for sustainable management of water resources/Ecohydrologie—La prise en compte de processus écologiques et hydrologiques pour la gestion durable des ressources en eau. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2002 , 47 , 823–832. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sandoval-Solis, S.; McKinney, D.C.; Loucks, D.P. Sustainability index for water resources planning and management. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 2010 , 137 , 381–390. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Archer, D.R.; Forsythe, N.; Fowler, H.J.; Shah, S.M. Sustainability of water resources management in the Indus Basin under changing climatic and socio-economic conditions. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2010 , 14 , 1669–1680. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Chowdary, V.M.; Ramakrishnan, D.; Srivastava, Y.K.; Chandran, V.; Jeyaram, A. Integrated water resource development plan for sustainable management of Mayurakshi watershed, India using remote sensing and GIS. Water Resour. Manag. 2009 , 23 , 1581–1602. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ajami, N.K.; Hornberger, G.M.; Sunding, D.L. Sustainable water resource management under hydrological uncertainty. Water Resour. Res. 2008 , 44 , 11–45. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Simonovic, S.I. Decision support systems for sustainable management of water resources: 1. General principles. Water Int. 1996 , 21 , 223–232. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jacobs, K.; Lebel, L.; Buizer, J.; Addams, L.; Matson, P.; McCullough, E.; Garden, P.; Sabila, G.; Finan, T. Linking knowledge with action in the pursuit of sustainable water-resources management. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016 , 113 , 4591–4596. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Cai, X.; McKinney, D.C.; Lasdon, L.S. A framework for sustainability analysis in water resources management and application to the Syr Darya Basin. Water Resour. Res. 2002 , 38 . [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lotka, A.J. The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 1926 , 16 , 317–323. [ Google Scholar ]
• Subramanyam, K. Estudios bibliométricos de la colaboración en investigación: Una revisión. J. Inf. Sci. 1983 , 6 , 33–38. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bradford, S.C. Sources of information on specific subjects. Engineering 1934 , 137 , 85–86. [ Google Scholar ]
• Spinak, E. Diccionario Enciclopédico de Bibliometría, Cienciometría e Informetría ; UNESCO: Caracas, Venezuela, 1996. [ Google Scholar ]
• Álvarez-García, J.; Durán-Sánchez, A.; del Río-Rama, M.D.L.C. Scientific Coverage in Community-Based Tourism: Sustainable Tourism and Strategy for Social Development. Sustainability 2018 , 10 , 1158. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]

Click here to enlarge figure

Share and Cite

Durán-Sánchez, A.; Álvarez-García, J.; Del Río-Rama, M.D.l.C. Sustainable Water Resources Management: A Bibliometric Overview. Water 2018 , 10 , 1191. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10091191

Durán-Sánchez A, Álvarez-García J, Del Río-Rama MDlC. Sustainable Water Resources Management: A Bibliometric Overview. Water . 2018; 10(9):1191. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10091191

Durán-Sánchez, Amador, José Álvarez-García, and María De la Cruz Del Río-Rama. 2018. "Sustainable Water Resources Management: A Bibliometric Overview" Water 10, no. 9: 1191. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10091191

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals